- 01 May 2025 (16 messages)
-
What a drama queen -
Xverse dude sounds like he excited to add CP assets in the future -
Yeah, I thought the same when I saw that tweet -
Joined. -
@teysol if a VM was added to CP, how would that affect all existing code? Would it just be an additional option/feature, or would everything else need to be rewritten?
-
It would just be an additional feature, but it would be a lot of work. People would have to really want it. -
Lots of exciting stuff! Here's the full roadmap on GitHub: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/milestones
We've got an upcoming protocol change release in v11.0.0. Here're the release notes: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/releases/tag/v11.0.0-beta.1
Beyond that we've got an upcoming rebuilt CLI + wallet, then lots of miscellaneous optimizations, API improvements etc. etc.
A rough outline for some possible features in the next protocol change can be found in this milestone: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/milestone/48 All of that's up for discussion / debate of course.
That's just all of the general Counterparty protocol + reference implementation stuff. At this stage the ecosystem infrastructure matters as much as the node software, now that we've gotten so much work done on the latter over the past 1.5 years. -
Incentives for inner peace aka mental health stuff! -
I think AMM would be killer. That would suffice for a VM. I think that’s basically what users want.
-
It would be a total game changer. Everyone just wants to gamble.
- 02 May 2025 (68 messages)
-
Art = shitting in the sink? -
-
Great interview!
Highlight for me so far (still listening)
Interviewer: "I want to see Counterparty mass adoption"
Adam: "I think it's in the cards. Honestly." -
orangesurf (@OrangeSurfBTC) on X
Bitcoin is currently being used for non financial transactions to a massive degree 49% the UTXO set is sub 1000 sat outputs 43% of transactions in the past 2 weeks had an OP_RETURN or were inscriptions Don't shoot the messenger
-
Hi everyone. I've been off theses last months as it has been very difficult for me IRL... and to add to that, I got the luck of being hacked on 2 addresses 15 days ago 😭
I have secured all the others now, but I'm still trying to recollect what happened. I saw this 2 days ago, and I have no clear idea as the hack was 2 weeks ago.
I tend to think it was a bad chrome extension that looked on all the data from the websites and got some information from rarepepewallet and horizon web wallet.
The fucker address is: 13USjbgmzM4RBqCav5ZHkmAQ33HKAn3shL
I haven't had time to check in details what he did, but if you interacted with that address, please beware (he bought a lot of rarepepes with the PEPECASH he stole ...) -
I already told you but sorry for your loss it really sux -
wtf man
-
When someone send my stuff to a third party address without me having any knowledge of it it's a hack
-
and it's something automated
-
Yesterday I tried to get back some stuff from my address that had "no value"
-
and sent 4$ of BTC to the address
-
it got insta-sent to the hacker address
-
I succeeded by sending 1000 sats to the address (probably unable to send that much)
-
no BTC you moron
-
the same as any wallet
-
you get the passphrase or priv key
-
that's my biggest question
-
that's my 2 addresses
-
I think the bot doesn't care about the old version (no value). It's only aware of the latest version of CP
-
😔
-
In french we say "Remuer le couteau dans la plaie". Please stop 🥲
-
"rubbing salt into the wound" apparently in english
-
Damn man sorry.
Any idea what extension?
This has to be an inside job, someone trying to steal BTC would have no idea about CP assets.
How would such a targeted use case be possible on such a small community using a chrome extension? -
No way a large scale hacker using a chrome extension is referencing Bitcoin addresses for CP assets
-
It’s odd that address moved just 7 SJCX from an 8 year old address to the current address a year ago
-
-
Will be looking into it tomorrow
- 03 May 2025 (10 messages)
-
Joined. -
None -
Joined. -
Hey big brains !!
I’m trying my darndest to on board new people !
And I was wondering I could broker a deal !! lol
Counterparty takes down the odd message that FreeWallet is bad lol
And I’ll see if I can hunt up. A Jdog to remove the banner on token scan !
Maybe I could get him to put a nice message in its place ??
It all feels so odd to me and I have no answers to anyone who asks me about them. Because if you step back from a
“don’t understand the drama”
Point of veiw and step into a “just want to buy digital assets from the best place in the bitcoin universe”Type of idea.
It kinda feels
COUNTER PRODUCTIVE
NOT
A PARTY AT ALL
I know that I am not alone here just wanted to say it out loud !
Let’s fucking start partying again eh !!
So what say you !? -
both banners are true in the eyes of the site operators, this is a dead end, just use the tools you like and others will use the tools they like -
Digital slap fights are weird -
Its just how blockchains work
-
I'm sorry, I really do understand everyone's frustration. Obviously the ideal solution would be for everyone to just get along. That's why I spent months and months last year trying to work with J-Dog. Reducing the scope of bug fixes based on his demands (which he immediately reneged on), etc etc. But I can't in good conscience remove a warning against dangerous tooling that has been used repeatedly to attack the network maliciously. The only answer I have is "Don't use Tokenscan or Freewallet". There are good alternatives now. If they're not good enough for your use case, please provide feedback to the creators as to how to make them better, or contribute directly if they're open source.
-
(Deleted the duplicate message in the Horizon channel to keep the discussion here)
- 04 May 2025 (1 messages)
-
Discuss here? My two sats:
Two peas in a pod as far as I can see. Same story, new face but still unilateral rulership
- threatening to force vm on the community (major scope shift from feature rich to featureless)
- Avoidance of any metrics to guide development (no polling, or voting. Just censored github)
- Convoluting private service and public utility (horizon explorer/wallet do not belong to the community)
Obviously the ideal situation is open lines of communication. But it seems some lead developers don't believe in that
Looking forward to getting on board with the marketing plan from the new boss 🚀🌕
Will the community be expected to advertise Unspendable Labs service products for free?
Love how all these new features/bugs bury the older unfinished features/bugs that are obvious when you've been eating counterparty pudding for close to a decade.
Full steam ahead at chasing coat tails!
Counterparty General Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.