- 01 May 2021 (608 messages)
-
/p BEAUTYPEPE -
-
Hottest Pepe I’ve ever seen 😂
-
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/655wp3/this_is_lordkek_a_super_rare_pepe_asseton/
14th April 2017, $6,385 USD of Bitcoin.
BTC used then was $1250 USD, now worth $291,000.r/Bitcoin on Reddit: This is LORDKEK, a super rare PEPE asset(on Counterparty). It was just sold for $6,385. Cryptocurrency asset history was just made. RarePepe card trading has gone viral.Posted by u/[Deleted Account] - 1 vote and 2 comments
-
None -
Very very happy to see a no reserve finally -
Let markets be markets
-
-
Hand woven in Canada 😝, very high quality. Bad pic, when it arrives, I’ll have some better pics
-
Has wings, can’t see in pic
-
-
-
-
Wooooo nice n trippy :)
-
Jocko Willink's voice from a Joe Rogan or Tim Ferris interview?
-
Lol at the Rare Pepe shoutout, cool
-
Lil Bubble - DeFi State Of Mind (Jay-Z ft. Alicia Keys - Empire State Of Mind - Crypto Parody)
Jay-Z ft. Alicia Keys - Empire State Of Mind (Crypto/Bitcoin version). Big thanks to the DeFi champions 1inch Network for their support on this video: https://1inch.io/ They have a brand new wallet available in app stores 😊➡️ https://1inch.io/wallet/ ------- Lil Bubble Sponsors ------- These projects support the channel and enable us to produce more songs and videos! Some new exciting sponsors also on the way :) ⭐ 1inch Network 1inch allows you to trade across hundreds of DEXes on multiple networks. 1inch Exchange automatically finds you the best prices and performs the most efficient swapping routes for you. No sign-ups, trade directly from your own wallet: ➡️ https://1inch.io/ ----------------------------------- None of this is financial or investment advice. All content is created for entertainment purposes only. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lil Bubble NFT Collection presale: https://lilbubble.wtf/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IF YOU FEEL LIKE TIPPING: BTC: bc1q2hlp2fdlllk5jy4zxsj8pctms3sz4h5zzzheqj ETH: 0xEB7dC5D228c246E3D87F978AA0c316eE40e9e149 BNB: bnb1s8qf4mm2ffrd7hy7xnncmzkfh5p77pqnvelp0l ------------------------------------Socials -------------------------------------- Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/thecryptobubble Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/thecryptobubble Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/thecryptobubble Handle across all socials: @thecryptobubble ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All music recreated, performed and produced by Lil Bubble. No pieces of the original master recording used. https://lilbubble.wtf #crypto #bitcoin #altcoins
-
/p PEPENOMIST
-
-
/p -
-
PEPEBROKEBU
-
In regards to the current discussions about auctions and the lack of participation, prices, reserves yada yada...
If everybody here were to be a little more active on the DEX, liquidity and price finding would improve, barrier of entry would be lower, newcomers would find it easier to "get hooked" on PEPEs and overall demand would increase, This whole thing here is a fucking circlejerk (I like it, but it could be better).
In the last days I have placed dozens of DEX orders and only after shilling them on TG got some traffic on them.
Then, substantial traffic - at least on my bids.
So I can see that a lot of people are eager to sell some of their duplicates and triplicates, but nobody wants to go the extra mile and actually do the work to achieve that.
So for the sake of the community, I encourage everyone to put up some decent asks and some non-laughable bids for the holes in your (and everyone else's) collection.
If you dislike the DEX, set up a dispenser.
We need more traffic in GENERAL.
The auctions needs to be the places where you get the fucking GEMs (Series1, Less-than-50, complete MrHansel... etc).
Nobody wants to bid 200 on a 1/10000 Series 20. Lame!
A Lineup of RAREPEPE, BACHELORPEPE, ILLUMINATIPE, ZEROWINGPEPE, MORPHEUSPEPE however... THAT draws a crowd! DANK!
Excitement for auction comes back, and the community can satisfy its desire for focus on fucking DANKness and RARITY.
I'll spam this message in the three/four RAREPEPE/XCP channels, discuss here, there, or not.
my .02 PEPECASH ^^ -
FYI
currently there are
98 BUY orders for PEPEs on XCP DEX
314 SELL orders for PEPEs on XCP DEX
41 BUY orders for PEPEs on PEPECASH DEX
235 SELL orders for PEPEs on PEPECASH DEX
I imagine this could (should?) be thousands, really -
we collectively need to amp up our efforts to increase the network effect or we'll just trade back and forth the same cards with the same people.
-
We need to take the Pepe’s offline and put them in the mail and on eBay.
-
I don't see a way to do that that preserves scarcity, really.
Printing out 300 RAREPEPEs on some sub par card stock or stickers-on-pokemon won't do the trick. -
I’m going to be the test dummy. Give me a few more weeks.
-
-
-
Very high quality. Each card lives on its on address.
-
okay, so you're a step ahead of me in *that* regard. I think my inital point stands, tho.
-
I agree with all your points. It’s just not easy for newcomers. I love the dex.
-
it's amazing, just underutilized
-
100% agree. The price of XCP and availability on US exchanges is not in our favor.
-
is dex-trade not accessible from the US?
-
It is. But you need to go out of your way to get it.
-
how so? VPN?
-
I mean having to create a new account, deposit.
-
yeah I mean it's an exchange.
-
and you have to KYC etc.
-
but if you're willing to do that, it really works great right now.
-
Fees are killing us -
they do
but an order stays alive for what, a month or more? -
That’s why I liked when Joe said in 10 years, people will probably be mailing Pepe’s to each other when the tx fee is $500
-
I would like to sell mine , but I don't going to place a lot of orders if after they don't get filled
-
2 months
-
Every order is 25k sats
-
can I DM you my wantlist?
-
You can
-
Maybe I got some
-
I’d like to see someone to build a centralized exchange just for Pepe’s and cp assets.
-
I don’t think that would violate any sec rules if it’s just NFTs
-
well
would already help if e.g. opensea or any other NFT marketplace would recognize and support XCP -
Bridge between networks should work
-
Confirming same asset on differents blockchains pairing tokens or something like that
-
If someone get that, he will be rich
-
/p pepebirth
-
-
Only owners of the assets can make physicals -
Tokenize it.
-
/p Dexterpepe
-
-
Series 2 Card 35 Issuance 50! Asset Ownership + 1 of 50 for $3500 OBO. Last sold for 500XCP
-
This offer won't last long. Next offer will be on Opensea for $10k+
-
Hmm
-
Just printing pics are worthless. The value is in the art on the blockchain. The token is what hodls the value.
-
Only asset owners or those who have permission are authorized to print images for profit.
-
I'm waiting to see the day when bitcoin Blockchain Rarepepe copyright HODLers are filing lawsuits like Fury did.
-
-
-
/p rpdf
-
-
-
Rarepepe Directory Foundation would be nice for that. Rarepepedirectory.crypto
-
-
-
-
One token equals one print.
-
/p proofofpepe
-
-
The card holds the key.
-
Not just printing with no token. Every card has the key for the address.
-
Eminem - "Mom's Spaghetti" (Music Video)
parody Lyric subtitles available in video options (click the CC icon)
-
One token equals one token on the blockchain.
-
I’ll disagree. If I own the token and I put the key with the print, that’s my right to do so.
-
That doesn't give you the right to reprint the image.
-
You have no right without authorization
-
the rules are there are no rules this is all a dream
-
I own an original Picasso.
-
That gives me the right to reprint it?
-
stick a fork in picasso son
-
that was a universe
-
this is a metaverse
-
There are rules. Some just choose to ignore and try to rewrite their own.
-
-
I own the token, it gives me the right to print 1 copy.
-
love and war have a set of ∞
-
Nope
-
Not with copyright material
-
You hold the right to resale that Digital token and imagine.
-
wait i thought this was magic?
-
u casting someone elses spells?
-
Not any physical reprint
-
-
dream magic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JZom_gVfuwThe Notorious B.I.G. - Juicy (Official Video) [4K]
Official Music Video Remastered in 4K for The Notorious B.I.G. - "Juicy" Director: Sean "Puffy" Combs Subscribe to the channel https://Rhino.lnk.to/YTBiggieSubID Stream or download The Notorious B.I.G. Essentials https://big.lnk.to/BIG From 'Ready To Die' (1994) Listen to the album here https://Rhino.lnk.to/readytodiestrm Follow The Notorious B.I.G. 👑 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/NotoriousBIG/ 👑 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/thenotoriousbig/ More Videos and Playlists Juicy ▶️ https://Rhino.lnk.to/YTJuicyID Big Poppa ▶️ https://Rhino.lnk.to/YTBigPoppaID Hypnotize ▶️ https://Rhino.lnk.to/YTHypnotizeID Official Videography ▶️ https://Rhino.lnk.to/YTBiggieVideographyID Stream more B.I.G. here https://Rhino.lnk.to/thenotoriousbigstrm The Notorious B.I.G. channel is the official YouTube home of The Notorious B.I.G. featuring his catalog of official music videos. The Notorious B.I.G. is widely recognized as one of the world’s most influential rappers and has sold more than 17 million albums in the U.S. alone. Before his murder in 1997, Christopher Wallace recorded two classic albums as The Notorious B.I.G. His debut Ready to Die arrived in 1994 and helped revitalize the East Coast rap scene with massive hits like “Big Poppa” and “Juicy.” Life After Death was released in March 1997 just weeks after he was shot and killed in Los Angeles. The record topped the U.S. album charts and featured the hits “Hypnotize” and “Mo Money Mo Problems.” It remains one of the few hip-hop albums to ever achieve Diamond certification from the RIAA.
-
you in my copyrighted dream
-
if you don't know now you know
-
Asset ownership goes along way.
-
What he said
-
-
The token is in the physical print. I’m printing for each token I own.
-
Digital
-
Physical are unauthorized
-
You only have the right to resell your digital ownership
-
Guess we’ll find out 😂
-
I'm ready
-
👊
-
-
Lawyer ready and copyright ready
-
Well it was inevitable I suppose. If I can’t print one copy with the token I purchased, I’m out.
Go tell token angel he can’t print the HomerPepe once for the $300k he spent. -
It’s complete bullshit artists think they can’t do one print for one token.
-
But it’s inventible someone will try to sue, so I’m prepared to take the risk.
-
He owns it. Lol
-
I sold Homerpepe longtime ago
-
Or wait, is it the same guy who owns it...
-
Let me check my database
-
-
-
Two different addresses for holder and owner
-
Sorry token angel, you spent $300k for HomerPepe but have no right to make one print 😂
-
I know them both
-
They know each other
-
Might be the same person
-
Who cares, he has no right to print one copy with his token 😂
-
They know each other, if not the same person
-
That guy is a 1/1 whale
-
I also sold another 1/1 asset to the same who bought Homerpepe asset.
-
Same two owners
-
Who do lots of business together.
-
What does that have anything to do with one another. As far as your concerned; 1 token does not equal one print
-
Gotta know what you getting into before you buy it
-
Well looks like you’re going to be suing me 😂
-
You can't buy an itunes Digital and try to make physicals to resale
-
-
-
I been trying to sale y'all ownership of some great assets at great prices that give you full rights
-
You can’t sell an iTunes digital track you bought to someone else.
-
A token I can.
-
You can't reprint from Digital to physical
-
I can and will.
-
The token I own is the right to one copy of the art
-
No it's not
-
Lol
-
You own a digital token
-
Yes, which is an original copy of the art
-
It's a digital copy
-
Consider the reverse
Ppl own a black lotus and make an NFT of it on opensea
In comes wotc with a CnD -
Not some physical copy you reprint and slap your name and logo on
-
Lol
-
I would assume that the asset owner can print the physical.
But then, he'd have to tie each physical to its XCP entity one by one -
Asset owner can
-
Not token holder
-
Who owns the digital copy of it if no one knows the code?
-
My point
-
Everything else is a proxy
-
You only own 1 digital copy per token you own.
-
Krek is saying the asset owner can print 1,000’s of coppies with a subasset like rarepepe.print
-
No original token needed
-
You don't have the right to reprint unauthorized physicals
-
So if you're the asset owner, print away
-
I’m saying the original token is the right to print 1 copy if the token stays with the print.
-
Yep. They have that right
-
Gives a whole new dimension to the asset owner market
-
Nope
-
Yep
-
Ok. That’s fine. Sue me 😂
-
Oh I am. There are a few I am. Lol
-
-
I don't think anyone should sue, this is crypto after all
But the community will recognize that prints that aren't signed with the asset ownership are proxies -
Precedents sets standards
-
The card is signed with the key to the token.
-
So the HOMERPEPE sets a precedent if the print is not done by the asset owner, really.
Then the question arises, what about my pepbot if the artist sold the rights to the asset and sold me a physical pepbot -
You can't reprint a physical copy of digital items to resale
-
Yep. We’ll figure it out apparently 😂
-
Sorry, I disagree.
Then it's a "gift card" that bears resemblance to the digital token -
For lack of a better term
-
That's between you and him. You own the rights? The token?
-
The artist sold you a physical item. With that physical item came a token and asset ownership?
-
-
-
I own a Token and a figurine.
The question is would he have had the right to issue a work of art that's based on an asset he doesn't own? Or does the lego figure fall under "resampling"? Does it make a difference that it's done by the original artist?
With the figure came a XCP token, but not the asset ownership. The pepbot is just the vessel for one PEPBOT token. -
Definitely copyright infringement. I encourage all artist to sue. Lol
-
This is all pretty new since usually the problem exists in the other direction
-
And I think I own the right to print one copy if the token is contained in the card.
-
Nope you don't
-
Buy itunes Digital copy
-
Where did that picture of Satoshi come from? Did you take the pictures?
-
You didn't buy no rights to reprint physical copies
-
I think REALLY going to the bottom of this will uncover that some cards never really should have been made
-
I bought the right to print one copy per token.
-
Jinqianshu is not a picture of Satoshi
-
Ha what’s the face?
-
Think of all the ones that represent a person, shouldn't that person own the rights to there image?
-
Their*
-
Yes, the person who took the photo
-
Nope. You bought 1 digital token and only have resale rights.
-
Jinqianshu doesn't represent a person nor Satoshi
-
Who took the photo? You did?
-
It's a representation of Rarepepes within counterparty on bitcoin Blockchain.
-
MoneyTree
-
Where did the photo come from?
-
Did they give you the rights to the photo?
-
I'm not selling their photo
-
You’re not? Is the token worth anything without the photo?
-
You can’t have your cake and eat it too.
-
Satoshi is not what's tokenized nor being sold
-
The fact people would try to say I’m selling this token and you can buy it but you can’t print one copy is ludicrous to me.
-
You have no rights to that photo and you made money from it. Without that photo, I wouldn’t have bought it.
-
You can't buy copyrighted digital items then try and reprint physical copies to resale
-
It’s not even your photo bro 😂
-
I have all rights to Jinqianshu
-
Im not selling that photo
-
You have no rights to that photo. Yes you are. It’s the entire card.
-
My art consist of collected material that represents bitcoin ecosystem
-
You trying to reprint unauthorized physicals of digital tokens/assets
-
Wtf does that mean. You used someone else’s photo and made it into a digital item that you sold.
-
Nope
-
You just trying to get over and reprint digital items. You can't. Lol
-
Hahah no what? Did you take the photo? No. Did you get rights to that photo? No. So how do you have the right to resell that photo?
Atleast I paid for the token from the creator, you.
What you did is way worse. -
Hope your money long and your biz is LLC or S-Corp
-
Ok well
I’m about zero concerned by your threats and it’s moving forward. -
There is no justification of what you trying to do
-
The picture you trying to say is not some copyright I reprinted
-
I don't make threats. You not the first person to try and reprint copyrighted Digital items to physical items for resale.
-
Ignore the warnings.
-
You can't reprint artist Digital items or copyright Digital items for unauthorized physical resale.
-
That picture of Satoshi is not the copyright nor same as Jinqianshu. Jinqianshu has several elements to it. You focus on one aspect which has no merit in court.
-
You had zero right to use that photo.
I purchased this art token fair and square and the token is contained inside the card that must be destroyed to get the token out.
I believe it is my right to print one copy.
You don’t.
If you sue me, we will find out. -
I'm not using that photo. Lol. You purchased a digital token only.
-
You didn't purchase no rights.
-
You can only sale your Digital copy.
-
I think most here would agree one token equals one print.
-
Nope
-
But since you own a bunch of assets, you don’t agree.
-
Let’s here from others.
-
You not the first lol
-
I’ve had this discussion here before.
-
Oh others own way more than me
-
That’s fine. I still think most assets owners would agree one token equals one print.
-
One digital asset is one digital asset. You have no reproduction rights at all.
-
You can only sale your Digital copy
-
-
Lol 100k
-
-
Then they dump the fees for cheap. Lol
-
Is it a reproduction if the token is inside the card? No, it’s an original.
-
They have spent a bit with the commissions to withdraw ... 100k ... almost nothing. as if we didn't have enough with the commissions of btc, uniswap ect ..
-
-
Digital
-
Any physical is a reproduction of a Digital item
-
Ain't no way around it
-
So wtf can I do with this digital image besides have it in my wallet in your opinion?
-
Rarepepes on bitcoin blockchain
-
I can’t do anything than. Putting the digital token in your wallet and then having it displayed in a VR museum would be a double print.
-
Keep it Digital
-
But it’s displayed two places.
-
Physicals are unauthorized reproduction
-
Let’s agree to disagree because we’re not going to agree.
-
You can listen to your itunes purchase on different devices
-
You can’t resell your iTunes
-
You can resell Rarepepes on the blockchain
-
Exactly. So what does iTunes have anything to do with this
-
Itunes is Digital
-
Who cares, you can’t resell it.
-
Just so you know and remind yourself how Digital rights actually work. Instead of the bs you trying to associate with your workaround
-
Lol
-
Was this licensed by Dexter’s Laboratory? Do you own a copyright of this image? -
Yes I own copyright to Dexterpepe
-
No, I think it’s bullshit your trying to sell tokens and you don’t think that token has any rights whatsoever
-
lol -
In the United States?
-
What is the issue?
-
can someone tldr me
-
I want to print a card and put the token inside it and Kek says that’s not my right
-
lol
-
just do it
-
I am
-
test the enforcement
-
Yep it’s inventible
-
-
Can someone link me to the contract and terms and conditions that show some kind of agreement
-
thanks
-
that would be great
-
-
It’s in Keks mind
-
got it
-
is this kind of like lottwo?
-
Digital rights
-
Far from in my mind. This been a longtime coming
-
We just been waiting for the rest of the world to show up.
-
Great show them to me
-
-
Digital rights should be super easy to show, that the person the bought X went into agreement Y with the purchase and or transfer
-
should be super easy to show
-
To purchase a Digital copy
-
Great show me the rights you are talkinga bout
-
about
-
Where are they?
-
No reproduction of physical items
-
Where is this stated?
-
So if I make a paperwallet, Im rekt?
-
that is physical, as a computer and an opendime
-
and he is not reproducing the token, the thing
-
you cant
-
Nope. You not reproducing
-
You selling your Digital item
-
Indeed, and making a paper card is not either
-
because the token is not reproduced
-
and you cant reproduce the token
-
so boom thats it case closed
-
Way different than what he trying to do
-
I can take all the pictures of your digital picture I want
-
no it is not
-
the key is the key is the key
-
Yes it is
-
no you are wrong, again I ask where is the agrement he entered into?
-
You should be able to show us all this
-
He is creating a card company to reproduce copyright images
-
Where is the copyright?
-
can you show us this
-
thanks
-
Nope
-
Lol
-
then you are rekt
-
See it in court
-
indeed
-
No you are
-
how am I rekt
-
-
That looks pertty rekt sir
-
In many ways
-
great name one
-
I would encouage you to write your argument in a long form, maybe a blogpost, it would be better for you and everyone else
-
You put up a lot with ridiculous $80k Reserve. Or even a Lordkek with ridiculous reserve. Or some other shit with ridiculous reserve
-
ok great thanks for your feedback
-
You mean like 30k ?
-
Then get but hurt because I asked for a $30k reserve of an item with only 3 in circulation
-
Im not butthurt
-
I simply did exactly as you requested
-
and simply put it in the blockchain forever
-
So what's the merit for it here in this topic?
-
that is all sir, so if you want to say X has a stupid reserve, and then YOU make a stupid reserve, then it speaks for it self
-
I just want to know where the copyright is, and if you can write your argument in a long form for us to read
-
Where it should be a remains
-
I'm not show and tell
-
ok
-
I'm buy and sale
-
I mean typcialy in a copyright case, you know, you show the copyright, just sayin
-
Duh
-
great
-
Then we have no contention, show the copyright and the case is closed, we both agree
-
Buy and sell! It’s sell, not sale. You even had a good rhyme opportunity go to waste there
-
Sell or sale. Look it up
-
Stop riding dick. You suck it better
-
A card company that has the token of every card image it prints inside it that I bought fair and square.
-
-
-
Your 2 cents don't matter. It's where it need to be
-
/p PEPEGRAVE
-
-
It where it need to be yo
-
Not just printing cards with no tokens purchased.
-
I like these arguments
-
Hope your company LLC or S-Corp
-
I would say, less talk more rock,
-
so instead of talking about a case, simply make one
-
then report back, untill then
-
-
yea I kno
-
@XCERXCP get ready man, no printing paperwallet with picture
-
😂
-
-
Not what he printing. Lol
-
lol
-
It will be a blank card with the key inside. That token I spent $3,000 on can’t have a single image printed.
-
-
-
Is there a prototype of the said item @XCERXCP
-
-
-
They are being printed now. Arrive next week.
-
This is great.
-
Rarepepes on bitcoin Blockchain setting precedents and making history.
-
-
-
This would have a token in it somehow?
-
ah I see it
-
So it is a paper wallet, it has the passphrase and a picture of what is inside, not a lot different from an opendime bag with the sticker of the card on the outside
-
Yes, token is in the middle of the card. Two cards with token in middle. Need to destroy card to get token.
-
ok
-
They are being printed in hongkong, each card actually says freehongkong on it too really small 😂. Hopefully printer doesn’t see it.
-
It's a physical reproduction of a digital item that he has no authorization or rights to reproduce. Only resell his digital item.
-
all paper wallets are physical reproductions
-
All
-
in fact they are not reproductions, they are just what they are, there is no reproduction going on
-
/p dexterpepe
-
-
I just reproduced dexterpepe
-
if I print this chat, so fucking what
-
it doesnt matter there is no token
-
and hell yes I can print this chat and there is no copyright
-
No merit
-
It's all Digital
-
not if I print it
-
it doesnt matter
-
It's the pepecard bot
-
Not for resale
-
yes If I print this chat then what
-
ill sell a copy of this chat
-
For advertising
-
its not copyrighted
-
It's Digital
-
so what
-
there is no agreement anywhere that anyone entered
-
if there is point us to it, but you know what, there is not one
-
that is all
-
All artist own copyright
-
I hope they do
-
I do
-
lol
-
And prepared for this day
-
great, please do it and stop talking about doing somehting, that would help us all
-
-
STFU
-
Not your beef
-
lol
-
Indeed, it still helps us all
-
Go run the auction
-
go run kek
-
reloaded copyright
-
go on now boy
-
Aww Theo I knew our lil beef wasn't settled
-
so when you do this non stop in here, it is all of our beefs
-
I knew you still felt some type of way
-
there is no beef with you I settled it
-
no I am simply telling you , there is no copyright
-
and please make the case instead of talking about doing something, just do it
-
that would be great
-
put up
-
does anyone else get a similar error when trying to open this link? https://xchain.io/address/1PEPEMNVDD49QOP4WYKSSVFKN9M31WRMLF
-
Don’t think the address is right
-
-
There is copyright when you file and pay for it
-
Great, can you show us any file documents?
-
It would be cool, maybe a first ever
-
Look above I already answered that
-
There is a link or a copy, ect with some blacked out parts?
-
Plus I hope all artist of their original art did the same
-
link me in the chat
-
The funny this is Keks art consists of other people’s photos he has no rights to 😂
-
step by step
-
first the file, that might not matter tbh
-
due to parody and remix
-
He doesn't understand that part
-
its ok we are simply back again, so do you want to put up, this filing?
-
or just talk about it
-
Satoshi picture is not Jinqianshu
-
ok nevermind
-
It's not up for several reasons
-
Lol
-
It's filed and documented for several reasons
-
-
Shaban’s stance is one token equals one print.
-
After an artist creates a piece, they have the right to make copies of their work, distribute those copies, perform or display the work publicly, or make works that derive from the original. ... Copyright only transfers to the piece's new owner if its artist evidences that it is his or her intent to transfer it.
-
You have a copyright in your artwork as soon as it has been created and fixed in a tangible object. It does not need to be registered with the copyright office or have a copyright notice attached to receive copyright protection. A copyright lasts for the life of the artist, plus 70 years after the artist's death.
-
Well buy up SOG and print them. He gave you permission
-
Great more talk, simply act
-
Reactions are my specialty
-
“Fixed in a tangible object”.
-
Where’s your tangible object?
-
How to copyright artwork
Registering the copyright for your work of art is a great way to protect your intellectual property rights. Find out how registration works, how it helps you, and more.
-
Guys
-
Just make a case and print the card
-
I will and I am going to.
-
I’m over this convo 😆
-
The discussion is not going to help, read above and make your own conclusions
-
There in full form
-
Agree.
-
I entcouage all to make long form arguments for things they have opinions about as these kinds of posts live a longer life
-
Also there is some pretty cool digital paper options not sure if in colour
-
There are no “rules,” and if there are Kekreloaded sure don’t make em! -
I will print physical copies of whatever I want so there.
-
And my card is not “BATMAN,” it’s “BATMANPEPE.” Totally different thing!
-
Band no can can trademark “Pepe” just like “Tommy’s” couldn’t.
-
What are the chances of the US Copyright Office issuing a copyright on a pepe? I have doubts they would if someone wants to sue.
-
You have it as a hate symbol according to ADL
Rare Pepe Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 May 2021 (608)
- 02 May 2021 (207)
- 03 May 2021 (318)
- 04 May 2021 (75)
- 05 May 2021 (134)
- 06 May 2021 (137)
- 07 May 2021 (122)
- 08 May 2021 (424)
- 09 May 2021 (137)
- 10 May 2021 (125)
- 11 May 2021 (83)
- 12 May 2021 (124)
- 13 May 2021 (129)
- 14 May 2021 (126)
- 15 May 2021 (100)
- 16 May 2021 (68)
- 17 May 2021 (109)
- 18 May 2021 (349)
- 19 May 2021 (186)
- 20 May 2021 (145)
- 21 May 2021 (108)
- 22 May 2021 (70)
- 23 May 2021 (138)
- 24 May 2021 (104)
- 25 May 2021 (61)
- 26 May 2021 (67)
- 27 May 2021 (79)
- 28 May 2021 (62)
- 29 May 2021 (109)
- 30 May 2021 (75)
- 31 May 2021 (65)