Rare Pepe Chat

Rare Pepe Chat

Public archive of Telegram messages.

  • 2024

    • Dec 2024 (2250)
    • Nov 2024 (2796)
    • Oct 2024 (3717)
    • Sep 2024 (3139)
    • Aug 2024 (3137)
    • Jul 2024 (2534)
    • Jun 2024 (3654)
    • May 2024 (5303)
    • Apr 2024 (4911)
    • Mar 2024 (12782)
    • Feb 2024 (10067)
    • Jan 2024 (10883)
  • 2023

    • Dec 2023 (8428)
    • Nov 2023 (5830)
    • Oct 2023 (8710)
    • Sep 2023 (15313)
    • Aug 2023 (21741)
    • Jul 2023 (7581)
    • Jun 2023 (3410)
    • May 2023 (6634)
    • Apr 2023 (3511)
    • Mar 2023 (3764)
    • Feb 2023 (3910)
    • Jan 2023 (4186)
  • 2022

    • Dec 2022 (3699)
    • Nov 2022 (5326)
    • Oct 2022 (6108)
    • Sep 2022 (10866)
    • Aug 2022 (8487)
    • Jul 2022 (6566)
    • Jun 2022 (4888)
    • May 2022 (4670)
    • Apr 2022 (4424)
    • Mar 2022 (5977)
    • Feb 2022 (7730)
    • Jan 2022 (11680)
  • 2021

    • Dec 2021 (5720)
    • Nov 2021 (8316)
    • Oct 2021 (26206)
    • Sep 2021 (53005)
    • Aug 2021 (26177)
    • Jul 2021 (7227)
    • Jun 2021 (1529)
    • May 2021 (4644)
    • Apr 2021 (4878)
    • Mar 2021 (9585)
    • Feb 2021 (941)
    • Jan 2021 (331)
  • 2020

    • Dec 2020 (273)
    • Nov 2020 (490)
    • Oct 2020 (645)
    • Sep 2020 (695)
    • Aug 2020 (420)
    • Jul 2020 (267)
    • Jun 2020 (492)
    • May 2020 (762)
    • Apr 2020 (892)
    • Mar 2020 (600)
    • Feb 2020 (1056)
    • Jan 2020 (620)
  • 2019

    • Dec 2019 (233)
    • Nov 2019 (337)
    • Oct 2019 (524)
    • Sep 2019 (1305)
    • Aug 2019 (872)
    • Jul 2019 (807)
    • Jun 2019 (865)
    • May 2019 (991)
    • Apr 2019 (1479)
    • Mar 2019 (1671)
    • Feb 2019 (1334)
    • Jan 2019 (2149)
  • 2018

    • Dec 2018 (2002)
    • Nov 2018 (2341)
    • Oct 2018 (1981)
    • Sep 2018 (2940)
    • Aug 2018 (2809)
    • Jul 2018 (2771)
    • Jun 2018 (3060)
    • May 2018 (2143)
    • Apr 2018 (3687)
    • Mar 2018 (6278)
    • Feb 2018 (7151)
    • Jan 2018 (9523)
  • 2017

    • Dec 2017 (11664)
    • Nov 2017 (6802)
    • Oct 2017 (5856)
    • Sep 2017 (7716)
    • Aug 2017 (14323)
    • Jul 2017 (22350)
    • Jun 2017 (16215)
    • May 2017 (24045)
    • Apr 2017 (23039)
    • Mar 2017 (31752)
    • Feb 2017 (39541)
    • Jan 2017 (26014)
  • 2016

    • Dec 2016 (10097)
    • Nov 2016 (13313)
    • Oct 2016 (35364)
    • Sep 2016 (11976)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 25 February 2017 (1885 messages)
  • @279114941 #194260 11:03 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    has anyone pointed out, we're 80% of the way through?
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194265 11:04 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Why are we appointing dictators all of a sudden. Who are you people, Communists?
  • @279114941 #194266 11:04 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    and some are freaking out, wanting to make sure they get the absolute most out of the last 20%
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194265 #194268 11:05 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    It's just to stress that a selecting board should not be forced to explain their selection (because that's too time consuming).
  • @253963727 ↶ Reply to #194265 #194269 11:05 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Republic
  • @279114941 #194270 11:06 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    /p rpdf
  • @hodlencoinfield ↶ Reply to #194243 #194272 11:06 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    straight from the horse's mouth
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194263 #194273 11:06 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Ok. We have 100 submissions and 50 slots. Which get through?
  • @305486497 #194274 11:06 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Someone want gurupepe
  • @305486497 #194275 11:06 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    /p gurupepe
  • @253963727 #194277 11:06 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Kek will provide the answer, as it was written in the ancient scrolls
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194273 #194278 11:07 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    50 slots per what? Week? That's far too high...
  • @Needmoney90 #194279 11:07 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Its hypothetical
  • @Needmoney90 #194280 11:07 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    We have 20 submissions and 10 slots then
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194277 #194281 11:07 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Could use some scrolls now
  • @Needmoney90 #194282 11:07 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Which 10 get rejected?
  • @Needmoney90 #194283 11:07 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If we rate limit, we need to reject
  • @hodlencoinfield #194284 11:07 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    the last 10
  • @Eye4bd ↶ Reply to #194266 #194285 11:07 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    They gets mere success, and that makes them fully blatant!
  • @SHITCOINWHALE ↶ Reply to #194274 #194286 11:08 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    1ADNEAP6NRK8amcWvcC3eHFVgYBDbx5LpB

    Thank you
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194284 #194287 11:08 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    So we accept all submissions until we hit 1k, then boom done?
  • @Needmoney90 #194288 11:08 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    No more pepes?
  • @305486497 #194289 11:08 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Giveaway ?
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194290 11:09 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If we are expecting more people to enter the RarePepe space soon then it makes sense to start expanding the supply to fit the influx of ppl coming with their pepecash/xcp
  • @253963727 ↶ Reply to #194281 #194291 11:09 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    http://www.cedarcitylodge.org/books/Egyptian%20Book%20of%20the%20Dead%20(1895%20Edition)%20(243%20pgs).pdf
    None
  • @279114941 #194292 11:09 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    proposed heuristics: 1) if subject has been done 2 times or more: erk no more. do we really need 13 pepemoon,moonpepe,etcetc
  • @hodlencoinfield ↶ Reply to #194288 #194293 11:10 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    thats the plan, or at least a veeeeery long freeze
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194294 11:10 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Who get's to decide on the submissions? Collectors? Artists?
  • @Needmoney90 #194295 11:10 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I think we should have a slow and steady trickle
  • @279114941 #194296 11:10 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    2) is it engaging or build on existing history? if yes, +1
  • @Needmoney90 #194297 11:10 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Not a deluge for a week, and everyone fighting over the existing supply
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194298 11:11 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Can there be an off-market pepe system in place and ones that gravitate towards the top become accepted as certified rares?
  • @279114941 #194299 11:11 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    3) did taowa make it? if yes, -1
  • @SHITCOINWHALE #194301 11:11 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    harhar
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194302 11:11 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    That way people can submit junk in numbers. Kinda like steem.io
  • @279114941 #194303 11:11 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    cold blooded
  • @hodlencoinfield ↶ Reply to #194299 #194304 11:11 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    😂😂😂
  • @279114941 #194305 11:12 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    i dont care, we're pretty much done, if the last 200 are crappy, makes the earlier ones better, if theyre the best ever, makes the earlier ones better
  • @279114941 #194306 11:12 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    win win
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194305 #194307 11:12 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    The issue is keeping the community stimulated and excited with stuff to look forward to in the coming months
  • @279114941 ↶ Reply to #194307 #194308 11:13 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    for that, i would bite the bullet and slow down certification and bite the 2nd bullet and be merciless on what's been submitted
  • @SHITCOINWHALE #194309 11:13 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    /p relaxpepe do you remember the group with <400members?
  • @279114941 #194312 11:13 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    rarepepe is the hottest b in the bar, she can be picky
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194308 #194313 11:13 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Okay, so we agree submission must be slowed. If 20 pepes are submitted, and we accept 10, which 10 are rejected?
  • @djangobits #194314 11:13 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Keks Ancient Scrolls (draft):

    1. A maximum of 7 Pepes shall be selected each week, to be the rarest of the rare

    2. Five elders, including Mike shall select those 7 rare Pepes.

    3. To apply, Pepe creators must submit their already created Token and a link to the proposed picture into a publicly visible list.

    4. Each of the elders can give 1, 2 or 3 points to each applying pepe. 1 means: rejected, 2 means: maybe later, 3 means: that's a rare pepe! Cards with 5-9 points will be rejected. Cards with 10-13 points will be reviewed in another week or can only be put into directory by Mike's supervote. 14-15 points means immediate acceptance.

    5. Fees for successful submission are 10K Pepecash.

    6. Half of the submission fees have to be burned for Lord Kek. The other half will be distributed by the elders, in a manner that respects the duties and tasks that have to be dine.
  • @253963727 #194315 11:14 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I have an idea. I submit 200 pepe cards and they are all accepted :)
  • @hodlencoinfield ↶ Reply to #194311 #194316 11:14 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    its up to you
  • @253963727 #194317 11:14 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Problem solved
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194313 #194318 11:14 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    The ones that suck
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194319 11:14 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I don't agree completely
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194318 #194320 11:14 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    According to?
  • @nola1978 #194322 11:14 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I think quality has gone up since fees were raised
  • @hodlencoinfield ↶ Reply to #194307 #194323 11:14 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    during the freeze there wasn't a drop in wallet usage
  • @nola1978 #194324 11:14 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Maybe higher fee makes even better
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194322 #194325 11:14 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Raise them to 100k then
  • @Needmoney90 #194326 11:15 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Current market cap for a set is like 250k pepecash
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194327 11:15 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    lol^^
  • @Needmoney90 #194328 11:15 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    So its more than enough
  • @Needmoney90 #194329 11:15 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    100k mcap is cheap
  • @Needmoney90 #194330 11:15 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Put prices in line with the market
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194331 11:15 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    ^^ you are out of your mind
  • @Needmoney90 #194332 11:15 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I would happily purchase a full asset for 100k
  • @Needmoney90 #194333 11:15 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Contact me
  • @322990480 #194335 11:15 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Watch price of new cards get huge as people try to recover costs
  • @Needmoney90 #194336 11:15 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    All issuance? Of course
  • @322990480 #194337 11:15 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Less giveaways
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194337 #194338 11:16 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Thats the cost of not voting, sadly
  • @Needmoney90 #194339 11:16 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If we go the fee method
  • @279114941 ↶ Reply to #194326 #194340 11:16 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    that would cut in to what ive been doing but yes, its absurd to spend $10.00 and immediately its worth $1,000
  • @Needmoney90 #194341 11:16 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Costs are externalized
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194340 #194342 11:16 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Exactly
  • @hodlencoinfield #194343 11:16 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    voting and the shitty cards dont get in
  • @hodlencoinfield #194344 11:16 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    i like the shitty cards
  • @hodlencoinfield #194345 11:16 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    some of my favorites
  • @Needmoney90 #194346 11:16 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Of we go the fee route, rip the bandage off
  • @nola1978 #194347 11:16 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    /p pepepeanuts
  • @Needmoney90 #194349 11:17 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Put the fee near the mcap price
  • @hodlencoinfield #194350 11:17 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    voting on art is so lame
  • @hodlencoinfield #194351 11:17 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    a classic
  • @Needmoney90 #194352 11:17 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If you cant sell it, too bad
  • @253963727 ↶ Reply to #194348 #194353 11:17 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    👍
  • @279114941 #194354 11:17 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    they spend 10 bucks and i can buy half their issue aftermarket for 50 bucks
  • @322990480 ↶ Reply to #194339 #194355 11:17 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    The fee method helps but to use he logic of higher the better will continue at the same scale for ever just won't work there will be a middle group where it works best beyond that wouldn't offer benefit
  • @279114941 #194356 11:17 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    ive been loving it but it has to dry up some time
  • @Nyanloutre ↶ Reply to #194350 #194357 11:17 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    👍
  • @hodlencoinfield #194358 11:17 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    there's an inflection point fo sho
  • @253963727 #194359 11:17 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Because Monkey business
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194355 #194360 11:17 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    All sets go for 100k mcap or more
  • @hodlencoinfield #194361 11:17 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    but we arent anywhere close to that now
  • @Needmoney90 #194362 11:17 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Set the fee to what the market will bear
  • @Needmoney90 #194363 11:18 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Make people think twice before submitting
  • @253963727 #194364 11:19 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Submission for inclusion includes soul and soul of your first born
  • @hodlencoinfield #194365 11:19 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    im sure mike will make a good decision
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194366 11:19 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    you are deterring creators from caring about the platform with such a ridiculous fee
  • @279114941 #194367 11:19 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    i can see artists collective, sharing risks, sharing ideas, sharing issuance and certification costs
  • @322990480 #194368 11:19 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Not really think twice . People who can't afford to just won't do it . Some of best artists wouldn't be able to . Beyond a certain point it doesn't improve submissions it makes em worse and centralised to the few that can afford t
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194368 #194369 11:19 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Patron whales
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194370 11:19 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Artists Union? You are a Communist
  • @hodlencoinfield #194371 11:19 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    hey memetic check your pms
  • @279114941 ↶ Reply to #194368 #194372 11:19 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    the best artists will always be able to get sponsorship
  • @Needmoney90 #194373 11:19 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    ^
  • @hodlencoinfield #194374 11:20 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    /p stillpepe
  • @322990480 #194378 11:20 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Yeah for those who fund it to take a large stake further giving control to mostly only those that can afford y
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194379 11:20 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    This is a coup by rich collectors to strangle the rare pepe market
  • @253963727 #194380 11:20 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    We could develop an ai that chooses
  • @322990480 #194381 11:20 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Deregulate the markets!
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194379 #194382 11:21 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    We already have done that
  • @253963727 #194383 11:21 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Maybe Mike is an ai
  • @VitalikButerin #194384 11:21 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Girls love Pepe !
  • @hodlencoinfield #194385 11:21 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    /mike
  • @VitalikButerin #194386 11:21 PM, 25 Feb 2017

    photo_2017-02-25_23-21-19.jpg
  • @Nyanloutre ↶ Reply to #194380 #194387 11:21 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    yes just choose random
  • @253963727 #194388 11:21 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    That
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194389 11:21 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Your greed will leave you with a worthless platform as people move elsewhere. How do you win in a decentralized environment? Create the most value for everyone, especially creators. Investors are a far second. That's why this platform is so successful.
  • @279114941 ↶ Reply to #194378 #194390 11:22 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    fair is subjective of course but i wouldnt think 1% onerous
  • @279114941 #194391 11:22 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    visa charge 2%
  • @253963727 #194392 11:22 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I am stuttering again
  • @279114941 #194393 11:22 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    coinbase charge 14%
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194389 #194394 11:22 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I don't see fee holding anyone back, even at 10 dollars people are sending multiple a day
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194394 #194395 11:22 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    That is because the fee is way lower than what they sell for
  • @Needmoney90 #194396 11:22 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    To limit that, the fee should be a bit under the market cap of a card set
  • @Needmoney90 #194398 11:23 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Which right now is 100k+
  • @Nyanloutre ↶ Reply to #194396 #194399 11:23 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    then what ? this channel would be spammed by advertisings :D
  • @nola1978 #194400 11:23 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Yeah quality not quantity thanks
  • @Nyanloutre #194401 11:23 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    with people begging other to buy their cards
  • @279114941 #194403 11:23 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    yep, getting paid 100-1, hard not to place bets
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194380 #194404 11:24 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    /random 77
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194394 #194407 11:24 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    It might seem harsh, but if the fees get burned, no one can claim foul play
  • @322990480 ↶ Reply to #194402 #194408 11:24 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Yeah but 100k is a different stake than 4k
  • @djangobits #194409 11:24 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    /random 77
  • @Nyanloutre ↶ Reply to #194409 #194410 11:25 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    rekt :p
  • @322990480 #194412 11:25 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    The whole market will be affected higher sale prices for cards making entry and ownship harder to get into it
  • @djangobits #194414 11:25 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Hahs
  • @djangobits #194416 11:25 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    10K PEPECASH feels right for me...
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194407 #194417 11:25 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    It increases the worth of pepecash for existing holders as well
  • @MrCoins #194420 11:26 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    if you make the fee 100k the price of the cards will go up 10x which isn't good
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194415 #194422 11:26 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I am putting the price of a submission in line with what the artist can sell it for, nothing more
  • @MrCoins ↶ Reply to #194418 #194423 11:26 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    bad idea
  • @nola1978 #194424 11:26 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    100k is ridiculous
  • @MrCoins ↶ Reply to #194424 #194426 11:26 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    yes, it doesn't make sense
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194427 11:26 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Needmoney90 you are full of bologna
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194418 #194428 11:26 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Illusion.
  • @279114941 #194429 11:26 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    additional heuristic: cardcreators that dump all their cards in the past, -1
  • @MrCoins ↶ Reply to #194425 #194430 11:27 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    people will submit but if the card gets accepted they will sell it for 10k lol
  • @djangobits #194431 11:27 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I rewrote my draft:
  • @Nyanloutre ↶ Reply to #194422 #194432 11:27 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    nickname matches
  • @Needmoney90 #194433 11:27 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Well, what are cards selling for now?
  • @djangobits #194434 11:27 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Keks Ancient Scrolls (draft proposal):

    1. A maximum of 7 Pepes shall be selected each week, to be the rarest of the rare

    2. Five elders, including Mike shall select those 7 rare Pepes.

    3. To apply, Pepe creators must submit their already created Token and a link to the proposed picture into a publicly visible list.

    4. Each of the elders can give 1, 2 or 3 points to each applying pepe. 1 means: rejected, 2 means: maybe later, 3 means: that's a rare pepe! Cards with 5-9 points will be rejected. Cards with 10-13 points will be reviewed in another week or can only be put into directory by Mike's supervote. 14-15 points means immediate acceptance.

    5. Fees for successful submission are 10K Pepecash.

    6. Half of the submission fees have to be burned for Lord Kek. The other half will be distributed by the elders, in a manner that respects the duties and tasks that have to be dine.
  • @Needmoney90 #194435 11:27 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    For a full set
  • @nola1978 #194436 11:27 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Some people are also just trying to make pepecash moon quickly too
  • @nola1978 #194437 11:27 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    sticker (7).webp
  • @grassfedgoat #194438 11:27 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I checked on my Pepe's today and I spent over $200 in dex fees lol for a portion of them
  • @grassfedgoat #194439 11:27 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I don't think high submission fees are bad
  • @MrCoins #194440 11:27 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    guys i think this discussion is going in circles... PEPE is running as PEPE should be running
  • @grassfedgoat #194442 11:27 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Ok?
  • @grassfedgoat #194443 11:28 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    And you're listed on the directory
  • @grassfedgoat #194444 11:28 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    And you can hedge by buying cash
  • @grassfedgoat #194445 11:28 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    And some is burned
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194448 11:28 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Toawa the fk are you talking about
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194446 #194449 11:28 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Not really...
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194439 #194450 11:28 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    +1.... if you want to rate limit, you need to do something that will actually rate limit
  • @MrCoins #194451 11:28 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    PEPECASH is in the hands of the rarepepe foundation and the elite scientists.
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194452 11:28 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If you really think that you are deluded, if not then sinister
  • @grassfedgoat #194455 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Think about it
  • @grassfedgoat #194456 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Cash is required for submissions
  • @grassfedgoat #194457 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    People will buys cash
  • @MrCoins #194458 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Patience + Focus = Success
  • @ShawnLeary #194459 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Goat is back!
  • @grassfedgoat #194460 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    More demand
  • @279114941 #194461 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    im thinking fairvalue for a whole issuance is 500K pepecash, immediate value more in the ~100-250K pepecash range
  • @grassfedgoat #194462 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    So buy cash. Then submit
  • @grassfedgoat #194463 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    To hedge
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194454 #194464 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Sure you will. If I think I have created something really great that can bring in more than 250 bucks, I will submit
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194451 #194465 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Never was open.... You can go to Beefs Black Market if you can not accept that... You might fine NUDEPEPE there....
  • @grassfedgoat #194466 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    More demand = higher price
  • @grassfedgoat #194467 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Sell cash higher
  • @253963727 #194468 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If it is only limiting that is a concern then submission price would be the most direct effect
  • @grassfedgoat #194469 11:29 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    You just paid less for submission fees
  • @MrCoins ↶ Reply to #194465 #194471 11:30 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I never said I don't agree, just saying for people who are debating here
  • @253963727 #194472 11:30 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    However, there are issues with such a choice, awesome artist doesn't necessarily mean they have money
  • @Nyanloutre #194473 11:30 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    also if you barely get more pepecash than what you paid it's not very interesting
  • @grassfedgoat #194474 11:30 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    We're all paying a few dollars now for each dex tx
  • @grassfedgoat #194475 11:30 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Keep that in mind
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194471 #194476 11:31 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I see...
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194472 #194477 11:31 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    They work with an investor that can pay the fee in exchange for some percentage of the card
  • @grassfedgoat #194478 11:31 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    And this is to place an order that might not be filled if it's a bid or ask
  • @322990480 ↶ Reply to #194477 #194479 11:31 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Increasing centralisation to a higher degree
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194477 #194480 11:31 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Pepe shark tank
  • @grassfedgoat #194481 11:31 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If you're confident in your artwork. You won't mind the fee
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194473 #194482 11:31 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    That's the risk... it's an economic decision which is why I personally like it
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194477 #194484 11:31 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I'd only invest if I see the card first...
  • @grassfedgoat #194485 11:31 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If you're looking to make quick money you will be deterred
  • @MrCoins ↶ Reply to #194483 #194486 11:31 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    exactly
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194480 #194487 11:31 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Drives up quality :)
  • @253963727 ↶ Reply to #194477 #194488 11:32 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    That could work, more complicated for beginners
  • @grassfedgoat #194489 11:32 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    It's the free market at work
  • @DefinitelyN0tMe #194491 11:32 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Just saw a new icons on wallet
  • @279114941 #194492 11:32 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    art isnt usually a flippers market
  • @322990480 ↶ Reply to #194489 #194493 11:32 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    .....Free market isn't forcing a specific price
  • @DefinitelyN0tMe #194494 11:32 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    for what option this icons there so? Just for knowledge how many was borned?
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194495 11:32 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    You are all orchestrating the destruction of this platform
  • @279114941 #194496 11:32 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    so artists should realize money comes in time
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194489 #194497 11:32 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Exactly. That's what I say. Capitalism over communism. Bitcoin is founded on free market capitalism
  • @MrCoins #194498 11:32 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    The higher the fees, the higher the prices of the cards, the less accessible they are to new users... not good if you want a massive user base
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194492 #194499 11:32 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Exactly. And it shouldn't be
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194483 #194500 11:32 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Nope. You keep ppl from submitting low quality pepe s
  • @DefinitelyN0tMe ↶ Reply to #194494 #194501 11:32 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Burned
  • @279114941 #194502 11:33 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    i thought artists wanted to create art and to sell art so they can create more art
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194493 #194503 11:33 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    It is if you're the scientists boss
  • @grassfedgoat #194504 11:33 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    And created the market in the first place
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194495 #194506 11:33 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    What's your proposal then?
  • @Nyanloutre ↶ Reply to #194502 #194507 11:33 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    👍
  • @grassfedgoat #194508 11:33 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If this market wasn't created there would be no conversation right now
  • @322990480 ↶ Reply to #194504 #194509 11:33 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    No you can't invent some new definition of free market
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194502 #194510 11:33 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Yes, and investors want to invest in quality art. Investors can support quality artists and everyone wins. We get rare limiting plus higher quality cards
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194505 #194514 11:34 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    10k submission fee would not be that high. It's 27$ now, so many might take that risk...
  • @Nyanloutre #194515 11:34 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    first we need a bigger user base
  • @253963727 #194516 11:34 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    But of course Mike wanted to try voting. Try for a month and see how it goes
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194509 #194517 11:34 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    How is that a new definition?
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194520 11:35 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    ^^
  • @grassfedgoat #194521 11:35 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Create rare Pepe 2 and see how fast it catches on lol
  • @253963727 #194522 11:35 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Helpful aren't I ;)
  • @322990480 ↶ Reply to #194517 #194523 11:35 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Free market economics isn't setting a price and forcing people to pay
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194516 #194525 11:35 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    No
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194526 11:35 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Rare Pepe 2 is being made rn
  • @nola1978 #194527 11:35 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I said it was interesting
  • @231097075 #194528 11:35 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I would decide on a desired fee in USD, and adjust the pepecash fee every month or so as it fluctuates if necessary
  • @Needmoney90 #194529 11:35 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Ok, let 20 cards in a week, the 20 that pay the highest fee
  • @Needmoney90 #194530 11:35 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Done
  • @nola1978 #194531 11:35 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    But too many oppose
  • @279114941 #194532 11:35 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    if there's no need for immediately recouping certification fees then what's the hurry
  • @253963727 ↶ Reply to #194525 #194533 11:35 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    You didn't want to try voting?
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194523 #194535 11:35 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    No one is forcing anyone
  • @grassfedgoat #194536 11:36 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Forcing would be making this room private and making people pay to be here
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194526 #194537 11:36 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Some tried already and failed...
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194528 #194539 11:36 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Or set pepecash fee and never adjust
  • @grassfedgoat #194540 11:36 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If there was no fee there wouldn't be scarcity
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194534 #194541 11:36 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Not to buy. To submit.
  • @253963727 ↶ Reply to #194527 #194542 11:36 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Oh
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194539 #194543 11:36 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If it moons you'll have an issue
  • @grassfedgoat #194544 11:36 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Which is literally the definition of rare
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194539 #194546 11:36 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    That.
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194545 #194548 11:36 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If proceeds are burned, im down
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194528 #194549 11:37 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    This is a good idea
  • @finestrares #194550 11:37 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    what's going on in here
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194547 #194551 11:37 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Yeah. That's foolish
  • @322990480 ↶ Reply to #194535 #194553 11:37 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Being forced to pay a specific amount determined by a few people to enter said market ain't free market . It would be like the government setting the price of corn like in heavily socialist countries . Not free market
  • @finestrares #194554 11:37 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    100k is way too much -- this is a free market & the $10 already weeds out the bullshit
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194553 #194555 11:37 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Not really at all man. Your example contradicts itself
  • @grassfedgoat #194556 11:37 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    See corn as Pepe's
  • @grassfedgoat #194557 11:38 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Not submission fees
  • @grassfedgoat #194559 11:38 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    And the dex as the place where trades happen
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194553 #194560 11:38 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Submission fee was never a free market. Only pepe trades were
  • @grassfedgoat #194561 11:38 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    There's no forcing
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194560 #194562 11:38 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Exactly
  • @grassfedgoat #194563 11:38 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Free market applies to the tokens themselves
  • @322990480 #194564 11:38 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Yeah and submission fees will rise he price of production.....And cost of entry
  • @grassfedgoat #194565 11:38 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Your example is more like Monsanto and their gmo seeds
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194554 #194566 11:39 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    You not only need to weed out the total bullshit, but reduce the submission rate though...
  • @grassfedgoat #194567 11:39 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Which this isn't
  • @322990480 #194568 11:39 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    It's an inflated price effecting and forcing he market in a direction not naturally but with implementation of rules
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194566 #194569 11:39 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    There are other means than fees.
  • @grassfedgoat #194570 11:39 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    There is no inflated price though
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194566 #194571 11:39 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    People arent realizing the fee is supposed to reduce submissions by design
  • @Needmoney90 #194572 11:39 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    They think its a negative
  • @finestrares #194573 11:39 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    well there are 741 members in here all with different opinions -- y'all will never come to a COMPLETE compromise
  • @grassfedgoat #194574 11:39 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Go on the dex and set bids for .000001 xcp
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194543 #194575 11:39 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    1 pepecash = 1 pepecash.. What moon?
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194576 11:40 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    lol
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194564 #194578 11:40 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    That's the goal (increase cost of production). Cost of entry not increased for existing cards, and folks can start with those
  • @grassfedgoat #194579 11:40 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Inflated price is doing what Bitstamp did and implementing a $5 minimum on each trade
  • @322990480 #194580 11:40 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    You raise the p ice to submit those creators increase price of product.... It happens alll the time
  • @grassfedgoat #194581 11:40 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If the dex said 3 xcp minimum on each trade? That would be different
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194582 11:40 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    The end result of that model is 'dealers' sharking up all submissions and making this place dryer than Barbara Bush
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194580 #194583 11:40 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Or increase the quantity of pepes
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194575 #194584 11:41 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Not everyone has pepecash on hand. People will be coming in holding other crypto, and the ones that have pepecash you have an opportunity cost imposed (Eg the investment in a card production might rather be spent selling and buying bitcoin)
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194571 #194585 11:41 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I do. But it's height is very hard to set as the effects can be all from successful to total disaster to the platform. If it's too high, ppl will not enter. If it's too low, it won't regulate enough.
  • @322990480 ↶ Reply to #194570 #194586 11:41 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Still increases price / asset value
  • @322990480 #194587 11:41 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Not because of free market demand but because of restrictions
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194586 #194588 11:41 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    How?
  • @grassfedgoat #194589 11:41 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    No one is forcing anyone here lol
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194585 #194590 11:41 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    My argument is if the fee is significantly below the value you can sell a set for, it encourages creation of sets for profit
  • @finestrares #194591 11:42 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    it's a big problem if you increase the submission price bc all the values of the rares will go up tremendously
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #194591 #194592 11:42 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Or people make more supply
  • @Needmoney90 #194593 11:42 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    The number of 100 issuance cards is too damn high
  • @finestrares ↶ Reply to #194592 #194594 11:42 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    but then rareness goes down
  • @279114941 #194595 11:42 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    1000 is the new 100
  • @Needmoney90 #194596 11:42 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Yes
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194582 #194597 11:42 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Exactly
  • @grassfedgoat #194598 11:42 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Seems like people are just butt hurt they didn't listen to all of us like 6-7 months ago imo
  • @322990480 #194599 11:42 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If I have 100 cards and sell for 2000 now but having to pay 100k now sell for 2500 increasing supply by 50 they are less rare and cost more per unit
  • @231097075 #194601 11:43 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    This is exactly what the central banks did before the 2008 crisis. They would raise and lower interest rates to stimulate or cool off growth. And it worked rather well
  • @279114941 ↶ Reply to #194599 #194602 11:43 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    why would you sell all your cards
  • @279114941 #194603 11:43 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    sell 5%
  • @279114941 #194604 11:43 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    raise price
  • @322990480 #194605 11:43 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Higher entry into the game by Normie's or anyone
  • @279114941 #194606 11:43 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    sell next 5%
  • @finestrares #194607 11:43 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    everyone will still burn their pieces, that enforcement doesn't make a difference
  • @279114941 #194608 11:43 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    raise price
  • @grassfedgoat #194609 11:43 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Am I the only one that has Pepe cash cold storage lol
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194610 11:43 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    lol @ Robby taking hints from central banks
  • @253963727 #194611 11:44 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I think it was mentioned that 100k is ridiculous
  • @finestrares ↶ Reply to #194610 #194612 11:44 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    lol
  • @253963727 #194613 11:44 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Say 10k or 15k
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194610 #194614 11:44 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Monetarism isn't perfect but It's better than a dictatorship 😄
  • @253963727 #194615 11:44 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Maybe 7777k
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194590 #194616 11:44 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I understand, but still it's very fragile to mess with... Also there's a huge gap between potential profit and real profit. Only if a few cards can be sold high, it doesn't mean that the whole issue will be sold that high.
  • @322990480 #194618 11:44 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    It was a general example of rising costs of submissions effects the entire economics of the game and increase costs and lowers adoption rate
  • @grassfedgoat #194619 11:44 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I think robbys idea of fixing it to usd is best
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194609 #194620 11:44 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Nope
  • @322990480 ↶ Reply to #194608 #194621 11:44 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    ^^
  • @grassfedgoat #194622 11:45 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Bc we have many factors here
  • @grassfedgoat #194623 11:45 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    We have cash/xcp
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194624 11:45 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    A 'dealer' is guaranteed to pay the 100k for one he likes. An artist is completely unpaid until he hits the mkt, most rares don't sell for 100k
  • @grassfedgoat #194625 11:45 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Cash/btc
  • @279114941 #194626 11:45 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    but after certification is complete, wouldnt mike retire like cincinattus and retire to the country?
  • @grassfedgoat #194627 11:45 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    And xcp/btc
  • @grassfedgoat #194628 11:45 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Also a perfect triangular arb opportunity
  • @279114941 #194629 11:45 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    so dictatorship with term limits
  • @grassfedgoat #194630 11:45 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    But besides the point
  • @grassfedgoat #194631 11:45 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Only if it's a benevolent dictatorship
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194582 #194632 11:45 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Let's take passport for example. You paid 4k pepecash to register, but made 45k simply on 1%.
  • @ciobooo #194633 11:45 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Joined.
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194606 #194634 11:45 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    We want cards to be traded and collected not hodld
  • @253963727 ↶ Reply to #194626 #194635 11:46 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Fair enough, he started it
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194636 11:46 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Sometimes you hit goldmines
  • @279114941 ↶ Reply to #194634 #194637 11:46 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    me too
  • @nola1978 #194638 11:46 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Well that's why you make good ones
  • @Needmoney90 #194639 11:46 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    "Keep submission fees significantly below the value a set sells for" and "keep submissions down" are mutually exclusive
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194640 11:46 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Shouldn't be anyone's business what I make on my work. I'm following the few rules like issuance
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194638 #194641 11:46 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Exactly
  • @279114941 #194642 11:46 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    i regularly still have to offer out cards i dont want to just to make sure that someone can buy it if they want to
  • @grassfedgoat #194643 11:46 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Quality will be traded
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194634 #194644 11:46 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    If you have a higher submission cost i think it would encourage more selling/trading by the creator to break even (minimally)
  • @nola1978 #194645 11:47 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Well the price is public
  • @nola1978 #194646 11:47 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Just saying
  • @279114941 #194647 11:47 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    so artists arent tending to the market side of things always
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194644 #194648 11:47 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Exactly. Because only higher quality cards will command a higher price
  • @grassfedgoat #194649 11:47 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    So they will get a return faster
  • @279114941 #194651 11:47 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    forget aftermarket support, some dont even seem to be concerned with initial distribution
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194648 #194652 11:48 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Gotta love market forces 😉
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194653 11:48 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I mean it's no business what I make in terms of people thinking they should get a bigger slice of it
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194654 11:48 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Increasing fee to reduce noise, perhaps. But this 100k shit is insane
  • @322990480 #194655 11:48 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Just have a rising price ffs the more submissions you enter each one increases the amount you pay to submit
  • @279114941 #194657 11:48 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    i dont think 100K is whatll be
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194655 #194658 11:49 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    You can have multiple telegram accounts
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194651 #194659 11:49 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Aftermarket support. I have lifetime warranty and rarity guarantee on my rare Pepes
  • @nola1978 #194660 11:49 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I never said 100k actually I didn't say anything
  • @279114941 ↶ Reply to #194659 #194661 11:49 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    haha i mean the constant bid, the bid thats there when there are no bids there
  • @nola1978 #194662 11:49 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I just walked into people arguing
  • @231097075 ↶ Reply to #194654 #194663 11:49 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    The goal is to have it high enough to meet the rate limit, but no higher
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194664 11:49 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    @nola1978 I know I'm talking to the proponents of such an idea here
  • @231097075 #194666 11:50 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Maybe 50k is fine, maybe 75k is fine, it's a dynamic feedback system
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194667 11:50 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I haven't been in a flamewar for a while so I'm flexin
  • @djangobits #194668 11:50 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    50K is too high...
  • @231097075 #194669 11:50 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    You watch the submission rates and periodically adjust
  • @253963727 #194670 11:50 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Maybe I'm to high
  • @231097075 #194671 11:51 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    The rate can be determined by the market of submitters, effectively
  • @Needmoney90 #194672 11:51 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    ^
  • @322990480 #194674 11:51 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    I know I am
  • @Needmoney90 #194675 11:51 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Best to set too high initially too
  • @Needmoney90 #194676 11:51 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    And bring it down
  • @djangobits #194677 11:52 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    We could have a floating system: for each pepe submitted in a week, 1K of submission fee will be necessary the next week
  • @djangobits #194679 11:52 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    So if 20 Pepes submitted to the directory in week 1, 20k is the fee the following week
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194677 #194681 11:53 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    People have multiple accounts
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194681 #194682 11:53 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Doesn't matter. If you accept 20 Pepes in a week, the following week 20k is the fee. How many did you add this week?
  • @322990480 #194683 11:54 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Why do people think submission fee/quality is a constantly rising line. I.e the higher the submission fee the better the quality. That is true but with everything in the universe past a certain point you will see it declining . 20k might improve quality while hitting 50k would start to see the quality decline again. This happens in everything in life nothing correlates exactly to extremes they begin to decline again past a certain point
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194684 11:54 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    ^^sanity
  • @253963727 #194685 11:54 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    7 spots per week get auctioned
  • @djangobits #194686 11:54 PM, 25 Feb 2017

    giphy.gif.mp4

  • @253963727 #194688 11:55 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Partners can step up for a percentage
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194681 #194689 11:55 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Not per submitter. In general..
  • @253963727 ↶ Reply to #194689 #194690 11:56 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    No because they make a new account to be another subbmiter
  • @djangobits #194691 11:56 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    With the floating system, if people submit too many Pepes, it will be really expensive the next week...
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194690 #194693 11:57 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    It wouldn't matter. They could submit as today. But for each new pepe in the directory, the submission fee in the following week will raise 1K. Not per submitter, in total.
  • @grassfedgoat #194694 11:57 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    What about voting via xcp and the votes are weighted from each address by Xcp days destroyed to prevent spam
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194692 #194695 11:58 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Too many submissions
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194694 #194696 11:58 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Here we go again
  • @279114941 #194697 11:58 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    you ever been to a really great party and in the middle of it your friend want to go to another even better party? how often has the 2nd party been better?
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194696 #194699 11:58 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Lol rough subject?
  • @finestrares #194701 11:58 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    the decentralized voting mechanism can easily be faked by mutliple accounts
  • @279114941 #194702 11:58 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    lets just stay at the first party
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194692 #194704 11:59 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Well at first it was free, then 4$, now $10
  • @253963727 #194705 11:59 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Cuz Mike gets bombarded with submissions when it opens up. And I believe based on chat but have no direct confirmation that Mike wants to close the directory at 1000 rares
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194706 11:59 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    The 2nd party is better when some Art Dealer comes up to you and robs $250 from your pocket
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194701 #194707 11:59 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    Not if you weight it by xcp days destroyed
  • @djangobits #194708 11:59 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    OK. Off to bed I am. Consider my floating fee. It's the same system as Bitcoin difficulty. I call it Pepeficulty. Keeps Pepes cult and rare.
  • @253963727 #194710 11:59 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    That leaves in the area of 200 slots left
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194701 #194711 11:59 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    It would be voted by pepecash holders but not happenin
  • @279114941 #194712 11:59 PM, 25 Feb 2017
    those highwaymen art dealers always get ya
  • 26 February 2017 (1447 messages)
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194700 #194713 12:00 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    And select which ones then?
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194714 12:00 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    lol 'voted' by pepecash holders
  • @hodlencoinfield ↶ Reply to #194650 #194716 12:01 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    anyone can submit except for toawa
  • @322990480 #194719 12:01 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Well I think they making 60 included in those numbers themselves for the game
  • @279114941 ↶ Reply to #194716 #194720 12:02 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    this is only rule
  • @hodlencoinfield #194721 12:02 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    they = the rarepepeparty team
  • @hodlencoinfield #194722 12:02 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    not the rare pepe foundation
  • @322990480 #194723 12:02 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Yeah lol sorry
  • @djangobits #194724 12:02 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Pepeficulty is the key, people. Floating fees week by week based on the number of Pepes submitted the week before...
  • @104473096 #194725 12:03 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    guys
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194724 #194726 12:03 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Good idea
  • @322990480 #194727 12:03 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Yeah would increase like a mining difficulty of a coin
  • @104473096 #194728 12:03 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    35 more members
  • @104473096 #194729 12:03 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    and we're 777
  • @104473096 #194730 12:03 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    kek's will
  • @322990480 #194731 12:03 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    If it rose too high it would drop the next week till a medium is settled on
  • @nola1978 #194732 12:04 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    What's pepe difficulty formula
  • @104473096 #194734 12:04 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    2^NUMBER_OF_TELEGRAM_GROUP_MEMBERS
  • @322990480 #194735 12:04 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Submissions
  • @djangobits #194736 12:04 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    You set it based on this week's number of submissions.
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194736 #194737 12:04 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Yes but how much to adjust
  • @nola1978 #194738 12:05 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Need formula
  • @grassfedgoat #194739 12:05 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    By number of unique dex tx of Pepe?
  • @279114941 #194740 12:05 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    we need PIDpepe
  • @grassfedgoat #194741 12:05 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    That way it's a real indicator of the market
  • @djangobits #194742 12:05 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    1k for each pepe during a week sets see for the next week...
  • @322990480 #194743 12:05 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Could do % based off week before. 50% increase in subs equals 50% increase in fees
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194742 #194744 12:06 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    sticker (7).webp
  • @djangobits #194745 12:06 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    If PEPECASH goes through the roof, you can still readjust
  • @grassfedgoat #194750 12:07 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    The most important factor is preserving scarcity imo
  • @djangobits #194751 12:07 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Or instead of 1K pepecash, you set a fiat amount per pepe submitted...
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194752 12:07 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    anything more than 10k will have the 'dealers' buying up all the spots
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194753 12:07 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    enforcing the cartel model
  • @253963727 #194754 12:07 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    # of submissions x 777
  • @253963727 #194755 12:07 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    (# of submissions x 777) / Dankness
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194757 #194758 12:08 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Then will readjust to way low fees the next week
  • @nola1978 #194759 12:08 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    But 1k probably too high
  • @nola1978 #194760 12:08 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    I guess idk
  • @nola1978 #194761 12:08 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Uncharted territory
  • @djangobits #194763 12:09 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Make readjustment smoother...
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194743 #194764 12:09 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Like that
  • @grassfedgoat #194765 12:10 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Maybe adjust the burn rate instead of submission fee
  • @djangobits #194766 12:10 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Or similar
  • @grassfedgoat #194767 12:10 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    It will have the same impact
  • @163786053 #194768 12:10 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    bow
  • @grassfedgoat #194769 12:10 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    The more submissions. The more cash burned
  • @253963727 ↶ Reply to #194762 #194770 12:10 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Minimum price preset
  • @163786053 #194771 12:10 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    1MsN8PvqWRA846zShe7cLYCQ1dAnmi1uiP
  • @grassfedgoat #194772 12:10 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Less cash in circulation
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #194769 #194773 12:11 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Not sure how that solves much
  • @nola1978 #194774 12:11 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Not that much less cash
  • @cryptochainer #194775 12:11 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Just keep it the same, and take breaks more often
  • @grassfedgoat #194776 12:11 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Over time it would "increase submission fees"
  • @cryptochainer #194777 12:11 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    All of these solutions just pretty much suck
  • @grassfedgoat #194778 12:12 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Without increasing them
  • @161714853 #194779 12:12 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    What the hell is going on with Pepe valuations in IndieSquare?
  • @161714853 #194780 12:12 AM, 26 Feb 2017

    photo_2017-02-26_00-12-45.jpg
  • @279114941 #194782 12:12 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    pepecash/pepetradingcard pairs are very hard to do in indiesquare. be careful
  • @161714853 #194783 12:13 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    It's gone funky
  • @hodlencoinfield ↶ Reply to #194777 #194784 12:13 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    its almost like we've been doing just fine so far....
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194758 #194785 12:13 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Bitcoin: "A single retarget never changes the target by more than a factor of 4 either way to prevent large changes in difficulty."
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194784 #194787 12:13 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    But the only preservation of scarcity is in issuance and series number
  • @grassfedgoat #194788 12:13 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Things can't get out of hand generally
  • @grassfedgoat #194789 12:14 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Any idea would work. We just need a good one
  • @279114941 #194790 12:14 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    and people losing their passphrase
  • @grassfedgoat #194791 12:14 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    True lol
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194781 #194792 12:14 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    But this week was too many submissions.
  • @hodlencoinfield ↶ Reply to #194789 #194793 12:15 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    how about just keep going how we are going, up the fee next week, see what it does to submissions and change fee again
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194789 #194794 12:15 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Pepeficulty.
  • @hodlencoinfield #194795 12:15 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    just like we've been doing
  • @279114941 #194797 12:15 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    i'd like to heap more on mike's plate and say that RPF take possession of 10% of issuance to insure against trapped pepes and incompetent wallet operators
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194793 #194798 12:15 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    That's probably the best first step
  • @grassfedgoat #194799 12:15 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Probably for a few weeks
  • @grassfedgoat #194800 12:15 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    But it's not a long term solution
  • @hodlencoinfield #194801 12:15 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    i dont really mind the deluge, is anyone here not getting there pepes in?
  • @hodlencoinfield #194802 12:15 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    1000 freeze
  • @161714853 ↶ Reply to #192219 #194803 12:15 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Ooh, me too
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194796 #194804 12:15 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Sorry, meant last week. This week subs were closed
  • @Kekism #194805 12:16 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    MEME MAGIC IS REAL
  • @Kekism #194806 12:16 AM, 26 Feb 2017

    photo_2017-02-26_00-16-41.jpg
  • @grassfedgoat #194808 12:16 AM, 26 Feb 2017

    photo_2017-02-26_00-16-47.jpg
  • @311094372 #194811 12:17 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Wow just logged on, full on discussion going on
  • @311094372 #194812 12:19 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Im still wanting to submit my first pepe joined like 2 weeks ago, am i i going to have to spend 100k to submit?
  • @253963727 #194813 12:19 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Wise Pepe says...The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.
  • @cryptochainer #194814 12:19 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    No
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194779 #194815 12:19 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    What's wrong there?
  • @cryptochainer ↶ Reply to #194811 #194816 12:19 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Everything is still the same right now
  • @311094372 #194817 12:20 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Thanks for the response crypto
  • @grassfedgoat #194818 12:20 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    What if btc mooned tomorrow causing 10k Pepe cash to be $200 though?
  • @cryptochainer #194819 12:21 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Then hopefully you have some
  • @grassfedgoat #194820 12:21 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Lolol
  • @311094372 #194821 12:21 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Lambos for all
  • @grassfedgoat #194822 12:21 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Exactly what I was thinking
  • @grassfedgoat #194823 12:21 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Hahahhaha ha
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194818 #194825 12:21 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Pepeficulty would readjust
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194826 12:21 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    So there is pent up demand to create Rares... limiting supply allowed will push demand for off-directory rares
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194826 #194827 12:22 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Those are not rare. Simple as that.
  • @grassfedgoat #194828 12:22 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    I don't think that's the point
  • @grassfedgoat #194829 12:23 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    If they're good they get included
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194830 12:23 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    The end result of all this in the long run is some decentralized mechanism where anyone can create an asset for their pepe and the market decides
  • @279114941 ↶ Reply to #194826 #194831 12:23 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    i agree with NM here (that's new), lets do what we can to make sure the demand to creat rares doesnt exceed the demand to collect rares
  • @djangobits #194832 12:23 AM, 26 Feb 2017

    ezgif.com-add-text (7).gif.mp4

  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194833 12:23 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    lol you are biting the hand that feeds you
  • @cryptochainer #194834 12:23 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    With that idea, start a new project, and do just that...
  • @279114941 #194835 12:23 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    you seem to think the artists are the only ones here with a value proposition
  • @grassfedgoat ↶ Reply to #194831 #194836 12:24 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Which is a function of submissions vs tx
  • @djangobits ↶ Reply to #194834 #194837 12:24 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Based on ETH.... Hrhr
  • @CollectiveMemeConscious #194838 12:24 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    the long term value of the whole economy is sustained by creativity
  • @cryptochainer #194839 12:24 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    People are inherently greedy, and will quickly create too many, overpriced items, that their is no buyer for
  • @grassfedgoat #194840 12:24 AM, 26 Feb 2017
    Submissions show demand from artists to supply
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 01 Feb 2017 (989)
  • 02 Feb 2017 (656)
  • 03 Feb 2017 (1263)
  • 04 Feb 2017 (1178)
  • 05 Feb 2017 (1179)
  • 06 Feb 2017 (762)
  • 07 Feb 2017 (608)
  • 08 Feb 2017 (849)
  • 09 Feb 2017 (707)
  • 10 Feb 2017 (956)
  • 11 Feb 2017 (834)
  • 12 Feb 2017 (1366)
  • 13 Feb 2017 (1511)
  • 14 Feb 2017 (1710)
  • 15 Feb 2017 (2558)
  • 16 Feb 2017 (1755)
  • 17 Feb 2017 (1281)
  • 18 Feb 2017 (1293)
  • 19 Feb 2017 (1904)
  • 20 Feb 2017 (2828)
  • 21 Feb 2017 (1986)
  • 22 Feb 2017 (1621)
  • 23 Feb 2017 (1509)
  • 24 Feb 2017 (1702)
  • 25 Feb 2017 (1885)
  • 26 Feb 2017 (1447)
  • 27 Feb 2017 (1563)
  • 28 Feb 2017 (1641)