- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 25 February 2017 (1885 messages)
-
has anyone pointed out, we're 80% of the way through?
-
Why are we appointing dictators all of a sudden. Who are you people, Communists?
-
and some are freaking out, wanting to make sure they get the absolute most out of the last 20%
-
It's just to stress that a selecting board should not be forced to explain their selection (because that's too time consuming).
-
Republic
-
/p rpdf
-
straight from the horse's mouth
-
Ok. We have 100 submissions and 50 slots. Which get through?
-
Someone want gurupepe
-
/p gurupepe
-
Kek will provide the answer, as it was written in the ancient scrolls
-
50 slots per what? Week? That's far too high...
-
Its hypothetical
-
We have 20 submissions and 10 slots then
-
Could use some scrolls now
-
Which 10 get rejected?
-
If we rate limit, we need to reject
-
the last 10
-
They gets mere success, and that makes them fully blatant!
-
1ADNEAP6NRK8amcWvcC3eHFVgYBDbx5LpB
Thank you -
So we accept all submissions until we hit 1k, then boom done?
-
No more pepes?
-
Giveaway ?
-
If we are expecting more people to enter the RarePepe space soon then it makes sense to start expanding the supply to fit the influx of ppl coming with their pepecash/xcp
-
-
proposed heuristics: 1) if subject has been done 2 times or more: erk no more. do we really need 13 pepemoon,moonpepe,etcetc
-
thats the plan, or at least a veeeeery long freeze
-
Who get's to decide on the submissions? Collectors? Artists?
-
I think we should have a slow and steady trickle
-
2) is it engaging or build on existing history? if yes, +1
-
Not a deluge for a week, and everyone fighting over the existing supply
-
Can there be an off-market pepe system in place and ones that gravitate towards the top become accepted as certified rares?
-
3) did taowa make it? if yes, -1
-
harhar
-
That way people can submit junk in numbers. Kinda like steem.io
-
cold blooded
-
😂😂😂
-
i dont care, we're pretty much done, if the last 200 are crappy, makes the earlier ones better, if theyre the best ever, makes the earlier ones better
-
win win
-
The issue is keeping the community stimulated and excited with stuff to look forward to in the coming months
-
for that, i would bite the bullet and slow down certification and bite the 2nd bullet and be merciless on what's been submitted
-
/p relaxpepe do you remember the group with <400members?
-
rarepepe is the hottest b in the bar, she can be picky
-
Okay, so we agree submission must be slowed. If 20 pepes are submitted, and we accept 10, which 10 are rejected?
-
Keks Ancient Scrolls (draft):
1. A maximum of 7 Pepes shall be selected each week, to be the rarest of the rare
2. Five elders, including Mike shall select those 7 rare Pepes.
3. To apply, Pepe creators must submit their already created Token and a link to the proposed picture into a publicly visible list.
4. Each of the elders can give 1, 2 or 3 points to each applying pepe. 1 means: rejected, 2 means: maybe later, 3 means: that's a rare pepe! Cards with 5-9 points will be rejected. Cards with 10-13 points will be reviewed in another week or can only be put into directory by Mike's supervote. 14-15 points means immediate acceptance.
5. Fees for successful submission are 10K Pepecash.
6. Half of the submission fees have to be burned for Lord Kek. The other half will be distributed by the elders, in a manner that respects the duties and tasks that have to be dine. -
I have an idea. I submit 200 pepe cards and they are all accepted :)
-
its up to you
-
Problem solved
-
The ones that suck
-
I don't agree completely
-
According to?
-
-
during the freeze there wasn't a drop in wallet usage
-
-
Raise them to 100k then
-
Current market cap for a set is like 250k pepecash
-
lol^^
-
So its more than enough
-
100k mcap is cheap
-
Put prices in line with the market
-
^^ you are out of your mind
-
I would happily purchase a full asset for 100k
-
Contact me
-
Watch price of new cards get huge as people try to recover costs
-
All issuance? Of course
-
Less giveaways
-
Thats the cost of not voting, sadly
-
If we go the fee method
-
that would cut in to what ive been doing but yes, its absurd to spend $10.00 and immediately its worth $1,000
-
Costs are externalized
-
Exactly
-
voting and the shitty cards dont get in
-
i like the shitty cards
-
some of my favorites
-
Of we go the fee route, rip the bandage off
-
-
Put the fee near the mcap price
-
voting on art is so lame
-
a classic
-
If you cant sell it, too bad
-
👍
-
they spend 10 bucks and i can buy half their issue aftermarket for 50 bucks
-
The fee method helps but to use he logic of higher the better will continue at the same scale for ever just won't work there will be a middle group where it works best beyond that wouldn't offer benefit
-
ive been loving it but it has to dry up some time
-
👍
-
there's an inflection point fo sho
-
Because Monkey business
-
All sets go for 100k mcap or more
-
but we arent anywhere close to that now
-
Set the fee to what the market will bear
-
Make people think twice before submitting
-
Submission for inclusion includes soul and soul of your first born
-
im sure mike will make a good decision
-
you are deterring creators from caring about the platform with such a ridiculous fee
-
i can see artists collective, sharing risks, sharing ideas, sharing issuance and certification costs
-
Not really think twice . People who can't afford to just won't do it . Some of best artists wouldn't be able to . Beyond a certain point it doesn't improve submissions it makes em worse and centralised to the few that can afford t
-
Patron whales
-
Artists Union? You are a Communist
-
hey memetic check your pms
-
the best artists will always be able to get sponsorship
-
^
-
/p stillpepe
-
Yeah for those who fund it to take a large stake further giving control to mostly only those that can afford y
-
This is a coup by rich collectors to strangle the rare pepe market
-
We could develop an ai that chooses
-
Deregulate the markets!
-
We already have done that
-
Maybe Mike is an ai
-
Girls love Pepe !
-
/mike
-
-
yes just choose random
-
That
-
Your greed will leave you with a worthless platform as people move elsewhere. How do you win in a decentralized environment? Create the most value for everyone, especially creators. Investors are a far second. That's why this platform is so successful.
-
fair is subjective of course but i wouldnt think 1% onerous
-
visa charge 2%
-
I am stuttering again
-
coinbase charge 14%
-
I don't see fee holding anyone back, even at 10 dollars people are sending multiple a day
-
That is because the fee is way lower than what they sell for
-
To limit that, the fee should be a bit under the market cap of a card set
-
Which right now is 100k+
-
then what ? this channel would be spammed by advertisings :D
-
-
with people begging other to buy their cards
-
yep, getting paid 100-1, hard not to place bets
-
/random 77
-
It might seem harsh, but if the fees get burned, no one can claim foul play
-
Yeah but 100k is a different stake than 4k
-
/random 77
-
rekt :p
-
The whole market will be affected higher sale prices for cards making entry and ownship harder to get into it
-
Hahs
-
10K PEPECASH feels right for me...
-
It increases the worth of pepecash for existing holders as well
-
-
I am putting the price of a submission in line with what the artist can sell it for, nothing more
-
bad idea
-
-
yes, it doesn't make sense
-
Needmoney90 you are full of bologna
-
Illusion.
-
additional heuristic: cardcreators that dump all their cards in the past, -1
-
people will submit but if the card gets accepted they will sell it for 10k lol
-
I rewrote my draft:
-
nickname matches
-
Well, what are cards selling for now?
-
Keks Ancient Scrolls (draft proposal):
1. A maximum of 7 Pepes shall be selected each week, to be the rarest of the rare
2. Five elders, including Mike shall select those 7 rare Pepes.
3. To apply, Pepe creators must submit their already created Token and a link to the proposed picture into a publicly visible list.
4. Each of the elders can give 1, 2 or 3 points to each applying pepe. 1 means: rejected, 2 means: maybe later, 3 means: that's a rare pepe! Cards with 5-9 points will be rejected. Cards with 10-13 points will be reviewed in another week or can only be put into directory by Mike's supervote. 14-15 points means immediate acceptance.
5. Fees for successful submission are 10K Pepecash.
6. Half of the submission fees have to be burned for Lord Kek. The other half will be distributed by the elders, in a manner that respects the duties and tasks that have to be dine. -
For a full set
-
-
-
I checked on my Pepe's today and I spent over $200 in dex fees lol for a portion of them
-
I don't think high submission fees are bad
-
-
Ok?
-
And you're listed on the directory
-
And you can hedge by buying cash
-
And some is burned
-
Toawa the fk are you talking about
-
Not really...
-
+1.... if you want to rate limit, you need to do something that will actually rate limit
-
-
If you really think that you are deluded, if not then sinister
-
Think about it
-
Cash is required for submissions
-
People will buys cash
-
-
Goat is back!
-
More demand
-
im thinking fairvalue for a whole issuance is 500K pepecash, immediate value more in the ~100-250K pepecash range
-
So buy cash. Then submit
-
To hedge
-
Sure you will. If I think I have created something really great that can bring in more than 250 bucks, I will submit
-
Never was open.... You can go to Beefs Black Market if you can not accept that... You might fine NUDEPEPE there....
-
More demand = higher price
-
Sell cash higher
-
If it is only limiting that is a concern then submission price would be the most direct effect
-
You just paid less for submission fees
-
I never said I don't agree, just saying for people who are debating here
-
However, there are issues with such a choice, awesome artist doesn't necessarily mean they have money
-
also if you barely get more pepecash than what you paid it's not very interesting
-
We're all paying a few dollars now for each dex tx
-
Keep that in mind
-
I see...
-
They work with an investor that can pay the fee in exchange for some percentage of the card
-
And this is to place an order that might not be filled if it's a bid or ask
-
Increasing centralisation to a higher degree
-
Pepe shark tank
-
If you're confident in your artwork. You won't mind the fee
-
That's the risk... it's an economic decision which is why I personally like it
-
I'd only invest if I see the card first...
-
If you're looking to make quick money you will be deterred
-
exactly
-
Drives up quality :)
-
That could work, more complicated for beginners
-
It's the free market at work
-
Just saw a new icons on wallet
-
art isnt usually a flippers market
-
.....Free market isn't forcing a specific price
-
for what option this icons there so? Just for knowledge how many was borned?
-
You are all orchestrating the destruction of this platform
-
so artists should realize money comes in time
-
Exactly. That's what I say. Capitalism over communism. Bitcoin is founded on free market capitalism
-
-
Exactly. And it shouldn't be
-
Nope. You keep ppl from submitting low quality pepe s
-
Burned
-
i thought artists wanted to create art and to sell art so they can create more art
-
It is if you're the scientists boss
-
And created the market in the first place
-
What's your proposal then?
-
👍
-
If this market wasn't created there would be no conversation right now
-
No you can't invent some new definition of free market
-
Yes, and investors want to invest in quality art. Investors can support quality artists and everyone wins. We get rare limiting plus higher quality cards
-
10k submission fee would not be that high. It's 27$ now, so many might take that risk...
-
first we need a bigger user base
-
But of course Mike wanted to try voting. Try for a month and see how it goes
-
How is that a new definition?
-
^^
-
Create rare Pepe 2 and see how fast it catches on lol
-
Helpful aren't I ;)
-
Free market economics isn't setting a price and forcing people to pay
-
No
-
Rare Pepe 2 is being made rn
-
-
I would decide on a desired fee in USD, and adjust the pepecash fee every month or so as it fluctuates if necessary
-
Ok, let 20 cards in a week, the 20 that pay the highest fee
-
Done
-
-
if there's no need for immediately recouping certification fees then what's the hurry
-
You didn't want to try voting?
-
No one is forcing anyone
-
Forcing would be making this room private and making people pay to be here
-
Some tried already and failed...
-
Or set pepecash fee and never adjust
-
If there was no fee there wouldn't be scarcity
-
Not to buy. To submit.
-
Oh
-
If it moons you'll have an issue
-
Which is literally the definition of rare
-
That.
-
If proceeds are burned, im down
-
This is a good idea
-
what's going on in here
-
Yeah. That's foolish
-
Being forced to pay a specific amount determined by a few people to enter said market ain't free market . It would be like the government setting the price of corn like in heavily socialist countries . Not free market
-
100k is way too much -- this is a free market & the $10 already weeds out the bullshit
-
Not really at all man. Your example contradicts itself
-
See corn as Pepe's
-
Not submission fees
-
And the dex as the place where trades happen
-
Submission fee was never a free market. Only pepe trades were
-
There's no forcing
-
Exactly
-
Free market applies to the tokens themselves
-
Yeah and submission fees will rise he price of production.....And cost of entry
-
Your example is more like Monsanto and their gmo seeds
-
You not only need to weed out the total bullshit, but reduce the submission rate though...
-
Which this isn't
-
It's an inflated price effecting and forcing he market in a direction not naturally but with implementation of rules
-
There are other means than fees.
-
There is no inflated price though
-
People arent realizing the fee is supposed to reduce submissions by design
-
They think its a negative
-
well there are 741 members in here all with different opinions -- y'all will never come to a COMPLETE compromise
-
Go on the dex and set bids for .000001 xcp
-
1 pepecash = 1 pepecash.. What moon?
-
lol
-
That's the goal (increase cost of production). Cost of entry not increased for existing cards, and folks can start with those
-
Inflated price is doing what Bitstamp did and implementing a $5 minimum on each trade
-
You raise the p ice to submit those creators increase price of product.... It happens alll the time
-
If the dex said 3 xcp minimum on each trade? That would be different
-
The end result of that model is 'dealers' sharking up all submissions and making this place dryer than Barbara Bush
-
Or increase the quantity of pepes
-
Not everyone has pepecash on hand. People will be coming in holding other crypto, and the ones that have pepecash you have an opportunity cost imposed (Eg the investment in a card production might rather be spent selling and buying bitcoin)
-
I do. But it's height is very hard to set as the effects can be all from successful to total disaster to the platform. If it's too high, ppl will not enter. If it's too low, it won't regulate enough.
-
Still increases price / asset value
-
Not because of free market demand but because of restrictions
-
How?
-
No one is forcing anyone here lol
-
My argument is if the fee is significantly below the value you can sell a set for, it encourages creation of sets for profit
-
it's a big problem if you increase the submission price bc all the values of the rares will go up tremendously
-
Or people make more supply
-
The number of 100 issuance cards is too damn high
-
but then rareness goes down
-
1000 is the new 100
-
Yes
-
Exactly
-
Seems like people are just butt hurt they didn't listen to all of us like 6-7 months ago imo
-
If I have 100 cards and sell for 2000 now but having to pay 100k now sell for 2500 increasing supply by 50 they are less rare and cost more per unit
-
This is exactly what the central banks did before the 2008 crisis. They would raise and lower interest rates to stimulate or cool off growth. And it worked rather well
-
why would you sell all your cards
-
sell 5%
-
raise price
-
Higher entry into the game by Normie's or anyone
-
sell next 5%
-
everyone will still burn their pieces, that enforcement doesn't make a difference
-
raise price
-
Am I the only one that has Pepe cash cold storage lol
-
lol @ Robby taking hints from central banks
-
I think it was mentioned that 100k is ridiculous
-
lol
-
Say 10k or 15k
-
Monetarism isn't perfect but It's better than a dictatorship 😄
-
Maybe 7777k
-
I understand, but still it's very fragile to mess with... Also there's a huge gap between potential profit and real profit. Only if a few cards can be sold high, it doesn't mean that the whole issue will be sold that high.
-
It was a general example of rising costs of submissions effects the entire economics of the game and increase costs and lowers adoption rate
-
I think robbys idea of fixing it to usd is best
-
Nope
-
^^
-
Bc we have many factors here
-
We have cash/xcp
-
A 'dealer' is guaranteed to pay the 100k for one he likes. An artist is completely unpaid until he hits the mkt, most rares don't sell for 100k
-
Cash/btc
-
but after certification is complete, wouldnt mike retire like cincinattus and retire to the country?
-
And xcp/btc
-
Also a perfect triangular arb opportunity
-
so dictatorship with term limits
-
But besides the point
-
Only if it's a benevolent dictatorship
-
Let's take passport for example. You paid 4k pepecash to register, but made 45k simply on 1%.
-
-
We want cards to be traded and collected not hodld
-
Fair enough, he started it
-
Sometimes you hit goldmines
-
me too
-
-
"Keep submission fees significantly below the value a set sells for" and "keep submissions down" are mutually exclusive
-
Shouldn't be anyone's business what I make on my work. I'm following the few rules like issuance
-
Exactly
-
i regularly still have to offer out cards i dont want to just to make sure that someone can buy it if they want to
-
Quality will be traded
-
If you have a higher submission cost i think it would encourage more selling/trading by the creator to break even (minimally)
-
-
-
so artists arent tending to the market side of things always
-
Exactly. Because only higher quality cards will command a higher price
-
So they will get a return faster
-
forget aftermarket support, some dont even seem to be concerned with initial distribution
-
Gotta love market forces 😉
-
I mean it's no business what I make in terms of people thinking they should get a bigger slice of it
-
Increasing fee to reduce noise, perhaps. But this 100k shit is insane
-
Just have a rising price ffs the more submissions you enter each one increases the amount you pay to submit
-
i dont think 100K is whatll be
-
You can have multiple telegram accounts
-
Aftermarket support. I have lifetime warranty and rarity guarantee on my rare Pepes
-
-
haha i mean the constant bid, the bid thats there when there are no bids there
-
-
The goal is to have it high enough to meet the rate limit, but no higher
-
@nola1978 I know I'm talking to the proponents of such an idea here
-
Maybe 50k is fine, maybe 75k is fine, it's a dynamic feedback system
-
I haven't been in a flamewar for a while so I'm flexin
-
50K is too high...
-
You watch the submission rates and periodically adjust
-
Maybe I'm to high
-
The rate can be determined by the market of submitters, effectively
-
^
-
I know I am
-
Best to set too high initially too
-
And bring it down
-
We could have a floating system: for each pepe submitted in a week, 1K of submission fee will be necessary the next week
-
So if 20 Pepes submitted to the directory in week 1, 20k is the fee the following week
-
People have multiple accounts
-
Doesn't matter. If you accept 20 Pepes in a week, the following week 20k is the fee. How many did you add this week?
-
Why do people think submission fee/quality is a constantly rising line. I.e the higher the submission fee the better the quality. That is true but with everything in the universe past a certain point you will see it declining . 20k might improve quality while hitting 50k would start to see the quality decline again. This happens in everything in life nothing correlates exactly to extremes they begin to decline again past a certain point
-
^^sanity
-
7 spots per week get auctioned
-
-
Partners can step up for a percentage
-
Not per submitter. In general..
-
No because they make a new account to be another subbmiter
-
With the floating system, if people submit too many Pepes, it will be really expensive the next week...
-
It wouldn't matter. They could submit as today. But for each new pepe in the directory, the submission fee in the following week will raise 1K. Not per submitter, in total.
-
What about voting via xcp and the votes are weighted from each address by Xcp days destroyed to prevent spam
-
Too many submissions
-
Here we go again
-
you ever been to a really great party and in the middle of it your friend want to go to another even better party? how often has the 2nd party been better?
-
Lol rough subject?
-
the decentralized voting mechanism can easily be faked by mutliple accounts
-
lets just stay at the first party
-
Well at first it was free, then 4$, now $10
-
Cuz Mike gets bombarded with submissions when it opens up. And I believe based on chat but have no direct confirmation that Mike wants to close the directory at 1000 rares
-
The 2nd party is better when some Art Dealer comes up to you and robs $250 from your pocket
-
Not if you weight it by xcp days destroyed
-
OK. Off to bed I am. Consider my floating fee. It's the same system as Bitcoin difficulty. I call it Pepeficulty. Keeps Pepes cult and rare.
-
That leaves in the area of 200 slots left
-
It would be voted by pepecash holders but not happenin
-
those highwaymen art dealers always get ya
- 26 February 2017 (1447 messages)
-
And select which ones then?
-
lol 'voted' by pepecash holders
-
anyone can submit except for toawa
-
Well I think they making 60 included in those numbers themselves for the game
-
this is only rule
-
they = the rarepepeparty team
-
not the rare pepe foundation
-
Yeah lol sorry
-
Pepeficulty is the key, people. Floating fees week by week based on the number of Pepes submitted the week before...
-
guys
-
Good idea
-
Yeah would increase like a mining difficulty of a coin
-
35 more members
-
and we're 777
-
kek's will
-
If it rose too high it would drop the next week till a medium is settled on
-
-
2^NUMBER_OF_TELEGRAM_GROUP_MEMBERS
-
Submissions
-
You set it based on this week's number of submissions.
-
Yes but how much to adjust
-
-
By number of unique dex tx of Pepe?
-
we need PIDpepe
-
That way it's a real indicator of the market
-
1k for each pepe during a week sets see for the next week...
-
Could do % based off week before. 50% increase in subs equals 50% increase in fees
-
-
If PEPECASH goes through the roof, you can still readjust
-
The most important factor is preserving scarcity imo
-
Or instead of 1K pepecash, you set a fiat amount per pepe submitted...
-
anything more than 10k will have the 'dealers' buying up all the spots
-
enforcing the cartel model
-
# of submissions x 777
-
(# of submissions x 777) / Dankness
-
Then will readjust to way low fees the next week
-
-
-
-
Make readjustment smoother...
-
Like that
-
Maybe adjust the burn rate instead of submission fee
-
Or similar
-
It will have the same impact
-
bow
-
The more submissions. The more cash burned
-
Minimum price preset
-
1MsN8PvqWRA846zShe7cLYCQ1dAnmi1uiP
-
Less cash in circulation
-
Not sure how that solves much
-
-
Just keep it the same, and take breaks more often
-
Over time it would "increase submission fees"
-
All of these solutions just pretty much suck
-
Without increasing them
-
What the hell is going on with Pepe valuations in IndieSquare?
-
-
pepecash/pepetradingcard pairs are very hard to do in indiesquare. be careful
-
It's gone funky
-
its almost like we've been doing just fine so far....
-
Bitcoin: "A single retarget never changes the target by more than a factor of 4 either way to prevent large changes in difficulty."
-
But the only preservation of scarcity is in issuance and series number
-
Things can't get out of hand generally
-
Any idea would work. We just need a good one
-
and people losing their passphrase
-
True lol
-
But this week was too many submissions.
-
how about just keep going how we are going, up the fee next week, see what it does to submissions and change fee again
-
Pepeficulty.
-
just like we've been doing
-
i'd like to heap more on mike's plate and say that RPF take possession of 10% of issuance to insure against trapped pepes and incompetent wallet operators
-
That's probably the best first step
-
Probably for a few weeks
-
But it's not a long term solution
-
i dont really mind the deluge, is anyone here not getting there pepes in?
-
1000 freeze
-
Ooh, me too
-
Sorry, meant last week. This week subs were closed
-
-
-
-
Wow just logged on, full on discussion going on
-
Im still wanting to submit my first pepe joined like 2 weeks ago, am i i going to have to spend 100k to submit?
-
Wise Pepe says...The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress.
-
No
-
What's wrong there?
-
Everything is still the same right now
-
Thanks for the response crypto
-
What if btc mooned tomorrow causing 10k Pepe cash to be $200 though?
-
Then hopefully you have some
-
Lolol
-
Lambos for all
-
Exactly what I was thinking
-
Hahahhaha ha
-
Pepeficulty would readjust
-
So there is pent up demand to create Rares... limiting supply allowed will push demand for off-directory rares
-
Those are not rare. Simple as that.
-
I don't think that's the point
-
If they're good they get included
-
The end result of all this in the long run is some decentralized mechanism where anyone can create an asset for their pepe and the market decides
-
i agree with NM here (that's new), lets do what we can to make sure the demand to creat rares doesnt exceed the demand to collect rares
-
-
lol you are biting the hand that feeds you
-
With that idea, start a new project, and do just that...
-
you seem to think the artists are the only ones here with a value proposition
-
Which is a function of submissions vs tx
-
Based on ETH.... Hrhr
-
the long term value of the whole economy is sustained by creativity
-
People are inherently greedy, and will quickly create too many, overpriced items, that their is no buyer for
-
Submissions show demand from artists to supply