i never had any media blocked by ad blocker before

btw it doesnt show me images after turning off adblocker. still trying to find out the way

yeah idk about ABP or AB, I use uBlock.

it's possible it's cached

ok will clear the catche

just tried other browser and images shows up there

so for sure its something to do with chrome

and adblocker

yeah but your feedback is good. should throw a proper error

and say "disable content blockers"or whatever. will think about the right UX.

"To forgive is divine" 👼

cleaned catche. loaded the page and images arent there. something to do with my chrome. ad blockers are off.
will try to find out what could be the reason

Yeah but a problem lies in that some types of people count on forgiveness of those that are willing and take advantage of the fact they can or will be forgiven. And there's been no apologies to forgive

tried on the phone using duckduckgo browser and works as charm.
something to do with chrome.
i believe majority is using chrome+adblocker , was good to find what makes media not to show up as this could save more potential customers

majority is using chrome just because it has all the plug ins such as leather wallet

xverse

magic eden and other btc browser wallets

to have chrome users is a must

Thanks for the info —- I've been using Brave with privacy settings probably too high. I'll give it a go with Chrome.

another thing. this time positive

congratulations unspendable Horizon wallet on being the only one wallet up to date

that brings the very first and major function of counterparty

issue asset. own it. manage it

im not sure if you knew, but there is no other wallet that can show what ownerships you have lol

funny? yeah kinda. but again, congrats guys you nailed this one

i was surprised when i transferred ownership to Horizon wallet. it was stored on utxo

and horizon show it in blue. let you manage it

its like the most important thing and finally in 2024 its there

counterwallet was letting do that too, but was eliminated and it was a time gap when CP didnt had the main function

you brought it back. thanks

suggestion: make explorer to see what asset ownership address hold.
wallet show what you own but explorer still not. Explorer is capable to catch only what was issued by that address. But if someone issued it 5 years ago it doesnt mean he is still owner of it today.

Oh she’s fun in here today

you would be the first ever to make it

nobody came to their minds yet

that issuer is not the owner

owner is who owns it at current block height and it doesnt have to be the issuer themselves

a tab with "ownerships" would be something NEW on decades old network.

We don’t have a separate tab but we do have a “My issuances” filter which allows you to display only your owned assets

yet again

i know what means "my issuances" but again

i can own x10 than that

for example

you send me ownership. you would have zero. i would have 1

on my address there would be no way to verify i have it

xcp.dev was fetching that data

but again i can suggest you on how to be the only explorer that people would need

and there would be no reason to use another explorer

for me personally i dont care who issued it. i care who owns it. and who controls it. thats why for me the owner is always on top

"my issuances" makes not much to me. because i can be shown something what i dont have nor do i control already.

to me much simpler is "ownerships" because that would show every asset that i control including my own issuances.
in my perspective the key is everything, i care less of someone behind that asset in the past, i care of who is the key/asset owner at the current block.

of course when browsing the asset on explorer you can show(should show) both:
issuer and owner. this way we could verify who issued it and who controls it today.

all this together would be very helpful, as again, the main purpose of why i see someone should buy XCP is to issue token and own it.

my two sats. hope it helps guys

another suggestion, never ever put info in the form of "warning" as jdog did all the time. he basically scared everyone away with his warnings.
great example is if someone would open to sell 0.1 xcp dispenser , his tools would put a WARNING on it lol.
thats a stupid way of thinking because he is censoring people that use the SAME coins. if XCP is made divisible its for someone who OWNS the KEY to sellect of how much he want to sell. even if its 0.0001 it should be accepted just because it meet all the network criteria.
solution to this is simply putting a filter to show the whole tokens only. bingo, problem solved.
so again, less unnecessary warnings like some past explorers did and you will be much much better.

Horizon has a good potential to be the best and take all the customers.

in short words it is crucial to solve the causing of the problem and not just putting a warning and hoping it will never happen again. warnings scarred people off.
to the great wallet and explorer suggestion would be to implement filter to show only whole tokens listed on dispensers. thats not necessary but better than warning given on other explorers for sure.

wish you the best in development

again my two sats.

Excellent point about warnings ⚠️

The whole reason we (and others) are able to have fewer warnings now is that we've fixed some of the worst bugs in dispensers at the protocol level.

I support unity in any fashion and trust me I tried very hard

I think this decision actually has some validity. People were selling 0.01 for the price of 1 XCP. While that is their right, a lot of people felt scammed. So highlighting in some way that the sale is “non typical” seems to be reasonable (to me anyways)

great achievement.
if someone use freewallet and tokenscan there is NO chance not to see "error" or "warning" in front of your eyes.
every single day all you see is "error" "warning" "limited"
and in most cases it is censoring of people which is kinda "anti bitcoin"

so thats why i am looking forward to use Horizon

and hope all together we can make it great

I agree that freewallets use of warnings instead of a less abrasive communication is a problem.

open source competition is good

well, Mike, who cares???
not your keys not your cheese.
instead of censoring people there should be away to stop the cause of errors

Its not totally about fewer warnings but also how to communicate them

filter wholes

exactly

every dispenser on tokenscan has RED warning

every of it

thats insane. that alone tokenscan is garbage

solution, index taproot addies. not let pay from it. not accept the broacast. simple as that

but just because someone might be using taproot its not necessary to scare away segwit or legacy users

Garbage is harsh. Kek

yeah but this can be worked around by just showing the adjusted price.

man there is no warning that tokenscan is behind and not synced

people could be buying empty dispensers

so yeah in my eyes its garbage

I get it

they are first to warn when its not necessary but they are last when it's crucial to warn

if there is at least 1 block behind, there should be something that says "sir we arent there yet"

thats how important explorer is

there has to be no room for errors

errors are for newbies

imagine "highlighting" you in some form of censoring.
thats just not right.
same network. same coins. same nodes.
all the same.
all equal.
if i would want to open 0.01 XCP dispenser and you would label me red, i would never use your tool again.
and just to say - i am not opening 0.01 dispensers , but what i am after.
you censor people- you lose people.
we dont need banks.
we are all satoshi.
bitcoin doesnt ask for permission. we forgot that.

so simple answer would be. nobody asked for permission to list something red label free. this has to be permission-less

agree permissionless is the ONLY WAY

I think there is a middle ground, as Adam mentioned, without a giant red warning.

what someone do to something that cant be regulated? they regulate explorers. so if anyone who owns explorer will start to censor people based on what he think it will go far away from being decentralized

thats just opinion.
again.
nobody asked for permission

we have it granted by bitcoin.

next time when making a coin make a larger supply

make it non devisable

just like the emblem vault scam. they get to decide what is a "hacked wallet" then freeze the assets which is bullshit

OR use filters

but not a warnings or labels on people

its purely a dna cleansing

if people are too dumb thats their fault

Explorers are, by nature, highly opinionated. Rare Pepes don't contain image pointers onchain, so the "social consensus" images are substituted. If "illegal content" were to be added to a token, I imagine explorers would feel its within their right to censor such content. If you want true permissionless, you gotta run your own node and local explorer

we cant hold everyones hand

learn or get rugged

that's a small community mindset

you can't abide by that rule when you manage a lot of traffic

most people don't know shit, and make errors all the time

your UX need to reach their poor knowledge

"the user is at fault" isn't a good thing ^^

most wont buy xcp just degen into pepes

small subset will stack xcp

fat fingers happen all the time... cant save everyone

having 20% of the users making errors or 1% isn't the same

you can't avoid having people making mistakes, but you can reduce the number of people that will by improving UX and tools

➕

another notice to Horizon devs

when clicking on BTC in explorer there says "404"

well lets say i want to see whats on dex against BTC

so that i dont need to check all the dex offers

you should take BTC as "token" to only show whats trading against it

it can have fewer tabs.
"info"
"orders"

maybe something else

I'll file an issue for that. Good idea

also another great thing to see that horizon wallet let spend BTC to zero and do not say "your wallet doesnt have enough" based on someone opinion like was in freewallet.
so again good to see you nailed it here and allow spend to zero based on the selection of key owner and not the tool maker. thanks for that

already so many points on why horizon is better already

i hated to see on freewallet when it says "you have to have that much btc to do things" or something similar.
again. who said that lol?
thats opinion. i can have as little as it can be accepted by network and still be able to broadcast.

if any wallet will not allow me to make a final decision when all network criteria is met. i would not use it. and thats why again, horizon is just better in so many ways

and again to horizon devs, if you want to see things to scale. let people control coins.
let us control BTC utxo's.
"coin control" and "RBF" would be something that would be in the level of todays wallets

still a lot work ahead but at least you have on what to work :)

i never understood why developers havent copy pasted electrum.
OP return came with BTC omni, electrum does all the job perfectly since then.
if any CP dev took electrum and turned it to CP wallet that would have been simply the best.
so there is a lot to learn from electrum.
if the wallet would let do as much as i can do using electrum, then i would be stunned and use nothing else. Electrum is best of best example that doesnt require full node and you can work with it FAST and have FULL control on everthing. no downtime.
thats why i suggest open electrum and see what function it has and if you can implement to your wallet :)

good day to all

one last thing to add. custom fee and suggested fee has to be divided by 0.1 SAT and not the whole sats. 1 satoshi is a lot nowadays. and by letting divide it you would let users to broadcast their transfers much more accurate :)
0.1 is default by major bitcoin wallets and you should follow their example.
if its enough 1.1sat/B to be taken in to next block:
1sat/b would be too less
and 2sat/b would be way tooo much.
This is way if i can target the accurate fee i can save in long term.
i hope it helps

edit.
freewallet had another annoying thing. it would ALWAYS spend all your confirmed outputs and consolidate it at no matter network conditions and no matter what you do.
if you have 10 BTC in 20000 outputs that nasty wallet would take ALL outputs to broadcast 0.000001 worth transfer and make you to be forced to OVERPAY.
i will have to test horizon with this and i hope that it will take just 1 output that covers the transfer or best if it would let control the coins and select it.

edit. also for horizon devs,
such error as "Instance of 'minified:ad0'" when fee is higher than balance i guess has to be written in human language as again do you want everyone who see this to come talk to you and waste your time asking what that means, i guess not :)) hope it helps.

thank you for the feedback! There's a lot here. Will sort through it and file issues accordingly.

Will be testing it daily and will try to help with improvement with my comments of what experience i have or how would i see it better :)

definitely appreciated

found the issue of what was happening and why i couldnt see images on chrome

let me explain.
i have been using Nord VPN as an app for a few yearss

yesterday i installed it as plug-in on chrome

and looks like the only way for me to see those images on Horizon explorer again was to disable nord vpn add-on

after disabling nord vpn add on and refreshing the page images instantly appeared

i can use nord vpn as an app and still see the images but if i turn it on as Chrome plug-in it makes unspendable labs horizon explorer without images

what is the reason of why ad blocker or vpn plug ins would want to filter your content?

i never had something important to me blocked by adblocker or vpn, thats why im trying to figure out of why thats happening

another suggestion. when opening "order" tab on explorer orders gets sorted by lowest price by default. was much much more comfortable if they would be sorted by the newest. thanks

can you explain why?

So we actually just built a little QoL feature for the orders: say you're selling XCP for PEPECASH, you can search to see who's buying XCP for PEPECASH. It'll show you the best prices available for the trade. If you click the "BUY" button, it will trigger the order form directly in the wallet with the fields fillled out. If you don't have enough XCP to fill the order (or you just want to buy less PEPECASH), you can scale it down, and it will preserve the same price so that you still match with the selected order.

@teysol designed and implemented the DEX over a decade ago. It's pretty great but it's also a bit barebones, so mapping its workflows to a typical orderbook experience will take some iteration. Definitely would like feedback. Cheers!

because nobody cares of whats lowest price is, its not going anywhere. everybody cares:
1. future
2. present

"best price" is past.

first thing what i want from explorer is to see mempool, to see the future

then i want to see whats the present

and only if i have time i can go look at the past.

explorer has to be tool to see things in real time

and verify the data non dispute-able

to explain further

the time frame of when you can see the future is limited (next block)

time frame that you can browse the past is unlimited

what thing you want to see first?

someone list FDCARD for 100xcp i want to see that by default

i dont want to see random asset listed at 0.0000001 xcp 2 months ago

i dont care if its cheap it was cheap 1 month ago too

that orders landing page would give me zero additional info if opened everyday :)

so orders expire after 2 months. But I totally agree the default view for the orderbook when you haven't specified a trading pair should be chronological.

thats why landing page(tab) is incorrect and i explained why

will create an issue for this. will get to it tomorrow.

first what users want is good real time experience. Everything thats happening now has to be priority. whats already happened is in the block forever and can be accessed later.

the thing that you let to sort by price is beneficial, dont take me wrong. its a very nice thing to have as an option, but that should not be priority.

it should go by block height and by the fee paid in that block. in that order (edit: or first broadcast at that block)

as example. the lowest fee tx paid and accepted in to block would be the very top order to show in explorer. it would be the "last" as it paid the lowest fee.

lets say we broadcast three orders.
X i pay 8sat/b
Y i pay 10sat/B
Z i paid 7sat/b

if we would all get accepted in to block the order book should go like this:
Z
X
Y

Y would be the first to "match" because it was the highest paid fee in that block. (at current rules)

hope it helps. (or unless you will remodel everything and make orders work the other way which would be great)

in my opinion all dex orders has to be rebuilt as they are wrongly built ages ago. i would list the order book by the first time seen at the cases when two orders matching at the same block.

to avoid snatching it should be built in a way. that if our both tx would get confirmed in to the same block, the one who got the match should not be the one who paid the highest fee(this doesnt help to CP economy) but the one whos tx was seen first. based on the timestamp on when the node see it.

in short words anyone who is skilled can cover CP and have advantage over new users because most of the things were built in a wrong way.

if you want to see. lets pick order and try to fill it and if i would want for you not to fill it i can make that happen. to me thats bullshit. when executing an order first i should never be second IF our both tx were included in to the same block.

if you guys will have power to rebuild of how orders on the dex works it would be great 🙏

who should get the order match:
if there were few transfers that wanted to match an existing dex order and confirmed ON THE SAME block the match should go to the first broadcast and not to someone who paid higher fee. "paying more" doesnt make any sense as we both confirmed in to same block it means i paid ENOUGH too.
all this wrong set up made people to lose orders they want to fill, waste on fees, cause errors and many more.
the only winners were miners, even if you would have order snatched from your nose, you would then have to go and cancel that hanging unfilled open order- and again the only winners were/are miners. the model should be built that it would benefit CP users.

the only exception of when the one who broadcasted and paid more should make a match is IF the order that we are trying to fill is unconfirmed in the mempool and it would confirm all together in to upcoming block. then it would all be decided by the priority.

it needs deeper thinking. but the model should be bulletproof. you click first, you should get it. that how it should work.

if this, then

this

but if matching existing order then should be

this

because at the moment to broadcast first at the rules where the winner is who pay more is the worst thing to do.
let me explain why, lets say you see something you want to buy for 100xcp and broadcast the order to match it.
i see that you are "buying" something and thinking, let me see, maybe i want it too. and i have time until the next block hits.
and if i do.
i can broadcast with a bit higher fee after you and make you trapped where we have to get back at freewallet output consolidation that i was talking about earlier today.
and there is no RBF no cancelation no anything. the first to broadcast would be trapped as fuk and he couldnt do anything. even if he would want to open another order with higher fee - freewallet would use the change from the first broadcast as all the coins were consolidated. that would make his first order to ALWAYS confirm first and spend 100xcp where my order with 100.01XCP would win it. and if you had only 150xcp in your balance you would lose that "battle" as all your tx that you pay 101xcp that came after the first would fail as insufficient XCP balance. you only had one shot and you used it broadcasting first.
not even mentioning if you would start panicking seeing you losing and click mouse twice a second trying to act fast - they would rate limit you on tokenscan and freewallet. so not that they would limit you to control your funds but they will shut your eyes to even see who won that "battle".
why do i wright all this here? because the changes are badly needed and i want to address the worst of what we had so we could avoid this. i am not hater of freewallet, i used it long time, i was addicted to it because there was nothing else to use.
and now when there is new wallet and explorer i will not look back. will stick to horizon and hopefully those changes will make CP great again

always think about if there is a way to penetrate/beat the orders. if there is. they arent built correctly.

i hope you guys will take this in to consideration and think about rebuilding of how orders on CP are working.

freewallet didnt had a single function that was working correctly as it should, not even close to say it was bulletproof.
this is why i hope new developers will make some big changes as everybody need those changes for the better.
Horizon is the new hope

just used horizen wallet for the first time and it was flawless thanks 🔥

another crucial thing. BTC pay can not expire ever if btc has left the buyers wallet. just because CP wallets do not has RBF or reverse or coin control. such nonsense as expiration that jdog had is another stupid nonsense.
imagine you set up BTC auto pay.
order matches and BTC leaves your wallet.
now its pending in mempool.
and now imagine hypothetically the same moment degents would start to pump runes and would lift the fees to 100sat/b and keep it half a day. what would happen?
oh well. i would lose my btc because he thought its okay for btc pay to expire after 21 blocks

you heard me right. 21 blocks and if not confirmed btc are gone.

thats of how i tested to prove that yes you can lose money while trading orders too

basically i penetrated every function so far and none held. hope the right decisions will be made.

Did u build anything ser or just trolling free open source software devs?

everything thats trading against btc can not ever expire if btc seen by the nodes. ever. if seller is impatient for confirmation he has the right to spend the btc he has received.

i dont answer questions.

im here to say what i think about what we had, what we can have and what is reality.

the only way to achieve something is to speak. if you will ignore the major trouble's especially when someone addressing them, it will not lead to good. so another advice do not let someone shoot messengers

you acted as a troll here

No I haven’t actually

if your car will stop will you develop your own car?

i guess not

so? what do you want from me?

yeah the fking ignorance has killed CP

so if someone talks - say them thank you

just because again use not you who ise the network

and yet again reminder bitcoin is transparent

If there was only 1 option lol

and its not you. so shut up. let the ones who use it talk

tell me a single function that freewallet is good at. a single one

now that you talk

Ive used it fir years never had any issues but im not in here to fight over wallets. Im here to support freedom and OS development u just talk in circles like a a bunch of girls do. Keep this group on topic

man i told you moths ago

if you click once a day it will never be a problem

thats not usage we are after

no personal attacks in this channel

we click a lot.

please keep the discussion on topic

why dont you develop your own telegram sir

joking

i am keeping topic. i basically over time explained on where and how freewallet failed on EVERY function it has and still trolls comes saying it works great they used it.
means you are bad user and you are blind, but that doesnt mean the wallet is good. means you never fully tested it. and what i wrote are facts.

👋
I would say mpma, dispenser opening, order dex... And so on 😉

and just because we never had a working wallet ever i will do my best to make this finally happen. if needed ill explain every error and bug that i found.

If admins are going to let this psycho babble on im out

Mpma is blind send dude. the multisig would charge some extra btc and would mess up the affective rate that there is no chance you can calculate it. want to bet?

want to bet that you cant do accurate multisend?

bet your money or shut up.

its not about that its sends out assets its about how it sends out. most of you are signing on fees that arent real and would NEVER be accurate

again thats a fact. if you want we can bet

i will say fee rate

and broadcast at that rate to win the bet

if the fee rate will be different ill win the bet.

so again. multisend doesnt work as it should. it works, but badly. newbie stuff

dispenser opening :D who carse if you could rug it. is that even a function? i said functions

order dex is explained above

and what is "so on"

name one function that works. that i would control it. and the numbers i sign on to would be the real ones.

exactly. there are none.
so this is why i talk to make horizon to be much better by solving all the issues people had while using CP

Thx for feedback 🙂
I may make a mistake. I understood 'functionality' 🤔
But as a light counterparty ecosystem user/newbie, i can say FW is a very nice tool AT m'y level.
And i'm discovering HW from few days only and it is a nice tool 🤟🔥

yeah until it will rate limit you and you will jump off the bridge thinking you was hacked

@stackbtc I really appreciate the feedback on Horizon but this isn't the place to discuss FW

its great until it fails.

oh believe me it is. unless you think that you dont need any insight of the past errors and advices on how to avoid and not to continue building on wrong foundation.

i bet you to challenge me to win any order you want

i will make it you not to win it.

thats a lot to talk actually. so you could understand of how can someone take advantage

you miss one thing. the guys like i who talk are the best to have in community. because i care. because i trade on cp. because i give liquidity and because i am daily user

if i didnt cared like them all i would say is good morning

so its up for you you want active users on the network or you want good morning in telegram

as more i write as more thankful you should be. i explained crucial things and all i get "its not the place"

muted

what a fucking moron

insted of muting people go put a block height on explorer

unless you was told you didnt came to mind

so you better start listening. not muting,. but listening

fucking piece of shit. start banning and muting messengers

muted 🙄

None

Oh wow I have a new question
For me anyway can we do sub assets as fairmints or assets that were fairminted ?!
Kinda like a wood chuck joke
But really sub assets as fairmints?

Yes to both, but currently the subassets must not contain lowercase or special chars

Okay fuuun
I have 10 cooking little series should be fun !! An snow I can put an end block on haha right lol 😂
No commissions yet though eh

Commissions are gonna be great

So fun question again
I know you do not have to lock supply so technically you could run a token again on fair mints right !
I was thinking about maybe doing one where people would
Have to be right on the ball to mint it only a few maybe each week or month!!
Get some hype going anticipation!!
That could be done right ?!

Yup

Fuuun

Don’t mess with Stack

We should make Stack ask all questions from Broadcast so we don’t have to read his novels each day

80 chars only

this message cost $.60 https://mempool.space/tx/a3bd4e375a44241b12c8c743ea08821580746d4e099df51906eb393076556ebe

He’d be bankrupt in about a day or two

lol. but hey he's not wrong: censorship resistance ftw

Haha I love stack, dude gets fired up quickly

The 1000 foot views shows passion
At least
There is so much passion around cp
So then it must be pretty dang important to a lot of people !!

@dimesquanderer

Ooof yeah, we have a ticket for better error handling coming down the line. In the meantime can you please provide your address here or dm me the address? I can look into it now

I’m not sure, I’m going to try reproduce it.

Need to move some Bitcoin

The relayer using XCP as the BTC would be so fire

Tx fee, that’s a total game changer

The worst thing about horizon is individually entering your passphrase lol

yeah we'll get to that pretty soon, just still trying to knock out features.

Ahh, didn’t even think about the coding aspects.

I was simply thinking security

It’s good for actually making people write it down

yeah i mean it's more secure to enter your pw each time but I get that that's a tradeoff the industry accepts.

Updated - 2178 XCP available on verified dispensers

https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/c180155299840781eea7ebea1a7d93d279c476a58eed734973b09ff5a96d2a96 -- 0.00009000 -- 326 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/6e9e7f6892b851c23c006f06f3556370c5b2e4062475d0287d37aa20975d856f -- 0.00012500 -- 150 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/57702fa1b2b86fc53f9c1a949b53ab6f5ac73207218a2fdedcca4520b062f732 -- 0.00012600 -- 325 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/32a15af6159c5aabc21d241e3b8fa2d4b5c8db4ce360eeecb281d422408c6bc4 -- 0.00014579 -- 200 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/a4fb650d3408a1d0a051ac58da6bb0b508ce049cef37df94de13a72996566469 -- 0.00014940 -- 672 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/e7ffb08363fb2621135d30ea3f7d32e11952b90dfa3ef07df77062a9c49fa647 -- 0.00016500 -- 115 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/12e89fda64a19b2a71e4f16344f73be3c3ed89629eabc55566d020ed7fbbc5ce -- 0.00017650 -- 147 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/a1ba19eeb7406f3fb989efbf956a9fbab26c3aee390cd8cd7a901b08b2c2717c -- 0.00018900 -- 243 XCP

- As always just DM me if any questions or issues with these dispensers
- 1x 2500 XCP block is also available OTC (just DM for more info)

Hi can you or someone please assist? I don’t know if I’m doing something wrong but I can’t click on the buy button. I’m trying to sell some XCP for BTC

buys with BTC aren't supported

(BTCPay is a total PITA. Will probably be the very last feature we add.)

No offense @teysol I know you designed it 😛

Atomic swaps are designed by him too and much more cool

It's a good thing Bitcoin evolved since btcpay ^^

the idea for atomic swaps on Counterparty actually came from @herpenstein !

(and Looney designed a variant, too!)

Btcpay still exists as a standalone and doesn’t completely suck btw

Does anyone actually use btcpay? I've found it buggy and clunky when I tried (at least, freewallet's implementation)

It used to work great with Counterwallet. Granted the fee environment today is very different from how it was when it was developed.

Yes. Companies use btcpay without counterparty. BTCpay was represented well at the Nashville conference.

https://blog.btcpayserver.org/btcpay-documentary-my-trust-in-you-is-broken/

Lol not sure if you're trolling or not? Isn't this totally different, with only the name being the same?

You tell me

Atomic learning university and or easy for dummies button ? When ever ? Or ?

I am not sure I understand the question but firemints does atomic swaps and we'll be launching horizon market which will have a psbt marketplace in the next few weeks.

yeah they're totally different. BTCPay is a Counterparty smart contract to complete btc trades on the DEX. btcpayserver is payment processing software.

Psbt ??

👋
I have an error message when i'm trying to select an addy :

Error fetching balances...

api is currently down, it is being addressed. I will have wallet back up momentarily.

wallet is back up Japrog please try again

explorer also back up

It is ok from my side, thx 🙏

v10.7.3 Hotfix released! Fix has been pushed for a transaction parse failure.
See release notes here: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/releases/tag/v10.7.3

All dispenses show 'MEMPOOL' in Block/Timestamp?

i think it looks normal now

Getting close to 10.8 !! ❤️

Are there ny plans for supporting audio in the explorer?

For instance, this one has music:
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/assets/FAIRWORDS

yes for sure.

Updated - 3939 XCP available on verified dispensers

new floor price: 9700 sats (~$9.31) 🔥
average price for 3939 XCP: 12098 sat (~$11.61)


https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/88d7a7ca9c03f264edb36f59e4c170632a9e97fcb979666376fa12e140d1db03 -- 0.00009700 -- 610 XCP (<= FLOOR)
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/7fbdecc730e60dcf7a244512e071db1615dab1b022b49af8086e49122d84bd53 -- 0.00010000 -- 760 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/5c2edc1c0fb20e13caa83ded73c8b52a228131eb860705feca1c8251c29c9196 -- 0.00012410 -- 500 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/de77f49d41a7211f88b0d4a4faed93b12e7542db382eb1db99bf18ece3873859 -- 0.00012450 -- 273 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/99388ffed9cceaf19a4fead56a2cefa73c8418e5be02dd3606887daf7a148a31 -- 0.00012480 -- 304 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/42e87e6a06bbdd5fdd07a19ad0fc245b2833a96b857bd0ab2912c34fe4f03415 -- 0.00012499 -- 200 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/6e9e7f6892b851c23c006f06f3556370c5b2e4062475d0287d37aa20975d856f -- 0.00012500 -- 95 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/57702fa1b2b86fc53f9c1a949b53ab6f5ac73207218a2fdedcca4520b062f732 -- 0.00012600 -- 325 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/32a15af6159c5aabc21d241e3b8fa2d4b5c8db4ce360eeecb281d422408c6bc4 -- 0.00014579 -- 200 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/a4fb650d3408a1d0a051ac58da6bb0b508ce049cef37df94de13a72996566469 -- 0.00014940 -- 672 XCP

- As always just DM me if any questions or issues with these dispensers

Hello 🤟

I have got thé message : error fetching balances on HW

Hi, same issue here

Hello! Apologies, our electrs instance is having trouble. I escalated to @teysol who is on it now.

we're back up

thank you for your patience!

Updated - 2972 XCP available on verified dispensers

new floor price: 9650 sats (~$9.30) 🔥
average price for 2972 XCP: 12058 sat (~$11.64)

https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/88c7b96837b4eed82794b406ac0a126a70c1a10bf1ddf82a2fb09078c498988f -- 0.00009650 -- 765 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/88d7a7ca9c03f264edb36f59e4c170632a9e97fcb979666376fa12e140d1db03 -- 0.00009700 -- 600 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/42e87e6a06bbdd5fdd07a19ad0fc245b2833a96b857bd0ab2912c34fe4f03415 -- 0.00012499 -- 200 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/6e9e7f6892b851c23c006f06f3556370c5b2e4062475d0287d37aa20975d856f -- 0.00012500 -- 95 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/57702fa1b2b86fc53f9c1a949b53ab6f5ac73207218a2fdedcca4520b062f732 -- 0.00012600 -- 325 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/32a15af6159c5aabc21d241e3b8fa2d4b5c8db4ce360eeecb281d422408c6bc4 -- 0.00014579 -- 200 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/a4fb650d3408a1d0a051ac58da6bb0b508ce049cef37df94de13a72996566469 -- 0.00014940 -- 672 XCP
https://explorer.unspendablelabs.com/tx/e7ffb08363fb2621135d30ea3f7d32e11952b90dfa3ef07df77062a9c49fa647 -- 0.00016500 -- 115 XCP

Note: A 1000 XCP block will be available OTC later today, at a lower rate than dispensers! Just DM if interested