- 01 February 2025 (36 messages)
-
if you're having a problem please file an issue on github (with steps to reproduce, logs, etc) -
and of course never upgrade (any software!) until you've personally tested that the new version works for your use case
-
Joined. -
-
Is there a point in filing an issue on github? Seems like others here are having the same issue with signing txs using 10.9.xx, exact same as I said I am having, and I was told it was my fault for not reading the release logs and it was a "bug".... so, will filing an issue get a different response? Not trying to be argumentative here, just saying, issue has already been raised and dismissed by you as a "bug"... and, its already been indicated how to reproduce, try to sign a tx from the API... in freewallet, electrum, sparrow, etc.
-
if everything is "backwards compatible", one should be relatively confident that things which worked before should continue to work no? Or am I mistaken. Again, not trying to cause issues, and happy to leave the channel if you would prefer.... but, it seems like the response here is to not discuss ppl having issues, and to discredit my issue as a bug, and try and flip it around on the developers who are updating to a "backwards compatible" version of CP without properly testing.
-
This is the weirdist psyop on the planet right now -
coming from gmoney thats saying something -
Is easyasset.art buyable? -
looks like they went with a bad bad registrar. I've used a handful over the last two decades. Sticking with name.com unless I can't get a puny or rando extension and have to transfer it, if I can. -
Will try to get the domain and rebuild everything back
-
🍀
-
Thanks for your respectful response to users reporting issues with signing in freewallet and pretending it was not an issue related to CP API updates, and indicating that things were 100% backwards compatible. Now it turns out that other users other than freewallet users have reported issues, and no conversation happens here related to it, just the standard "create a github issue for it", which you can easily close and ignore without much fanfare or community outrage. I think there is not much point in me being in this channel any further, as issues related to CP API updates are not being taken seriously or addressed. I will return in the future if/when I have additional issues with Counterparty-core updates, but for now, I have managed to resolve this issue on my own and get freewallet signing transactions again. I had hoped that after many months of drama, we could be respectful and you would be interested in actually addressing concerns by users, but that appears to not be the case. But then again, that is just my perspective. @vectorconfetti thank you today for your help in resolving the issue I was having with "upgrading" to 10.9.0... it is sincerely appreciated 👍️️️️️️
-
For any users looking for how to resolve the issue with signing v2 transactions with no input types returned from the CP API, you may find this commit helpful. https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/commit/95c92feb00a129fee1bbcd6493c784398a7ba9abupdates to allow signing of txs generated by counterparty-core 10.9+ · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop@95c92fe
As of counterparty-core 10.9, the core developers have determined that passing `script_pubkey` as has been done for the past 10+ years is now considered a bug. This resulted in signing libraries be...
-
L8r g8r
-
None -
Hello Counterparty community! I'm a crypto-rapper and I would like to offer you my services: creating a song/music video about your project. My clients include a large number of cryptocurrency communities: Dash, Peercoin, Novacoin, Deutsche eMark, Quantum Resistant Ledger, etc.
You can see my works on YouTube: just type "koresh tony".
If someone is interested in my offer, I am ready to discuss the details and provide a detailed estimate. Feel free to write to me in direct - I'm open for communication 😎
For example: https://youtu.be/lAfmZLWHY7k?si=P4Mb814Vtky9erRcKoresh Tony — OnionDonations: BTC: 17WPsRamqPyPAV2A2GxEwuLywaeCXQSzs9 LTC: LUhJG5BernpGG7keVkdwVyikKMa2axicw3 BCH: qp3yzrm40h74ej8306gwjsq044yr7pvtxcmngprxue ETH: 0x7cdBa64343a7FD1AD54c2902a6616B30826a9049
-
If anyone's interested, here are the slides from the brief talk I gave at The Counterparty event in Miami last weekend. (thank you again @tatianacoin for hosting 🙇♀️)
-
Tony Koresh.. are we the fork davidians -
What you mean?
-
You have never gotten any jokes about your name? Koresh was the taken name of the leader of the Branch Davidians, a sect that the FBI and atf murdered a bunch of women and children from
-
Waco
-
According to your logic, you can fuck up absolutely anyone - there were a lot of maniacs and murderers in the world, whose names and surnames coincide with ordinary people. Only a mentally retarded idiot would say, "Oh, dude, you have the killer's last name in your pseudonym! Ha ha ha!"
-
I'm from Russia. In our country, Koresh means "friend, comrade." Кореш = Koresh
-
Relax dude, i’m sure he didn’t mean any harm by it. The waco story is just very popular in a certain part of the world. -
I'm fine, thanks. Yes, I've heard about this story, but in fact I have absolutely nothing to do with it.
-
What a retarded response
-
just come to say gm and ... smh -
-
There he is ^
-
damn, Ouziel already fixed it :) https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/commit/49c5cd920492a908354e8504b262ddad756ec877Fix safe_rpc() · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core@49c5cd9
Counterparty Protocol Reference Implementation. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
and we've got a PR up for the brand new test framework: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/pull/2950
total test coverage at 80%, which is not at all bad esp. considering we were at 0% one year ago today! now working to get to 100% 🛠️Pytest v2 by ouziel-slama · Pull Request #2950 · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-coreDouble-check the spelling and grammar of all strings, code comments, etc. Double-check that all code is deterministic that needs to be Add tests to cover any new or revised logic Ensure that the...
-
in the API I see a psbt related field, are psbt's working already? -
Been using them here, but have been doing some reconstruction to add the witness data among other things - 02 February 2025 (77 messages)
-
yep they've been working for a few months now
-
Joined.
-
MPMA Sends fail to generate a transaction with more than 3 addresses · Issue #2988 · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core
Ever since "upgrading" to counterparty-core 10.9.0, users have been complaining about being unable to do MPMA sends and getting an "Unknown Error" returned from the API. I have ...
-
FYI... MPMA sends not working.
-
github issue created with steps to reproduce and verify issue, just like you prefer. Hope it gets fixed soon as many users have complained about losing this functionality in the past 24 hours after "upgrading" to counterparty-core 10.9+
-
Pls ensure that MPMA testing is included in your test suite... as i've been the one finding issues with MPMA manually (memos missing, now mpmas not working)... would be great to have that stuff tested automatically. Thx. 👍️️️️️️
-
Happy to do so, just please stay on topic👍🏻
-
FYI, the MPMA stuff is not a wallet specific issue… as is demonstrated in the issue that I created, it is an issue with the counterparty core API returning an error instead of a raw transaction.👍🏻
-
this is just a preview too -
Does any CP site list the current tx fees in simple terms
Send Cost: approx $1.05
Order Cost: approx $0.88
Issuance Cost: approx $2.75 + 0.5 XCP -
i use statoshi.info
-
but have to do some math with the info and approximate tx size
-
fuck you scammer -
Removed
-
I juggle mempool.space and preev.com to get an accurate estimate
-
Strange. I did one the other day with 3 and it created it but the trx was mangled with no inputs from the other problem you mentioned
-
Horizon is a nice wallet to import to -
Active developers
-
@teysol another old user who only trusted Counterwallet! -
#tbt to when prior maintainer pushed a protocol updated knocking wallet out of service.
-
damn been using Freewallet.io since 2017 and been great to me
-
Is there a community or demand to revamp code base and bringing it back up to protocol specs ?
-
absolutely, this isnt the first old user to ask about Counterwallet and wont be the last
just feel bad for anybody who didnt write down their 12 word phrase -
Is it worth spending time and resources to revamp code base
-
why not just copypasta horizon with the Counterwallet logo and skin?
+ pop the open source code in the xcp github -
-
Some people find it fun to build.
-
I'm not making any decisions for anyone. Just making a statement to see if there is users for it. Or migrating users to the 4 other CounterParty wallets is sufficient
-
Robby Dermody is back? lol
-
Tooling and dashboards are coming along nicely
-
I'll redirect to counterparty.io. Redirecting to Horizon would be unfair, even though Horizon is OSS and free
-
unfortunately, Counterwallet was abandoned over half a decade ago, and it completely stopped working over a year ago. its architecture makes it hard to maintain (it has a huge, not-super-necessary dependency on the "Counterblock" middleware). anyone is free to try to revive it though
-
classic did that already
-
-
we love open source
-
i wonder how he ended up at counterwallet classic -
How to misguide a user 101. Throw the term classic around in rooms
-
wow if you google counterwallet 2 of the top 3 responses are scam wallets
-
this is terrible - how can you fix that? SEO?
-
We need to report those
-
Maybe googles ai will push them down the list
-
ended up in the old xcp chat asking about the old login code you got from Counterwallet back in the day (a process which is so outdated and sucks for ppl who didnt write down their 12 word phrase)
-
How to get recommend links to appear up top
-
Search Engine Optimization ^
-
sometimes i think yall are too smart to remember whats its like to be a n00b
-
❤️
-
So those other links pay to rank, for the hope that they mislead users
-
just wait until you hear about mnl classic
-
DeepSeek might not be as disruptive as claimed, firm reportedly has 50,000 Nvidia GPUs and spent $1.6 billion on buildouts
The fabled $6 million was just a portion of the total training cost.
-
I invite you to enjoy the new AI to entertain ourselves a little, it is still a little slow or sometimes it fails lol I am still improving it xD I hope you like it anyway, you can test it on the 17art channel, welcome :)
Assetname:GODXPEPE
17Art link: https://17art.io/trump/GODXPEPE
CP Classic Link: https://classic.tokenscan.io/asset/GODXPEPE
CP 2.0 Link: https://tokenscan.io/asset/GODXPEPE
Orbital Market: https://orbital.market/assets/GODXPEPE -
No one said anyone is preventing anything so what's your point -
Using the dex on counterwallet is Excalibur
- 03 February 2025 (37 messages)
-
Yeah before Olga, the max was around 6kb, after Olga the biggest as Mike said was 60kb for a piece AL did as far as I´m aware. In the reports of SQRR https://sqrr.xyz/reports/ (the tab "reports") you´ll be able to see the biggest stamp in size by month @yodarkLinkYour Crypto Journey Gets Exciting with SQRR
-
Looks like this was quietly fixed…. Thank you. @teysol Can we please get a 10.9.2 hot fix release for this as this is impacting a great number of users trying to do MPMA sends now and is costing users much more in transaction funds having to send transactions one by one.
-
Also including this fix in the hotfix release, so 10.9.2 runs stable would be appreciated 👍🏻
-
filed this issue: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/issues/2984
-
@teysol any response? Would be nice to be able to tell users when they can expect MPMAs to start working again.
-
Joined. -
Why can't I send asset or btc from freewallet? Few peeps having issues
-
-
@DOGESTYLEEE For Freewallet support, please use the Freewallet support channel.
-
This is not a freewallet specific issue Adam... the error is coming directly from the counterparty API
-
Also, any word on when MPMA will be fixed and included in a working release? Interesting you can reply immediately upon the use of the word FREEWALLET, and immediately discredit, but have no time to answer when MPMA fixes will be included in a release
-
Can we please get over this unnecessary drama and focus on getting counterparty-core working so the USERS dont suffer?
-
Will happily create a github issue showing the issue is with counterparty-core.... but, I get no responses from you on when those fixes will get integrated into a release.
-
The only thing that uses electrs in counterparty-core... so pretty easy to determine the error is coming direct from Counterparty API and not discredit anything as "freewallet"... but if you want an issue creatd, happy to do so
-
Could it be just how your third party software is using the current api based on the old api you used to use?
-
Just thinking out loud
-
huh? Freewallet only communicates with counterparty-core which is on 10.9.0... so not sure what your getting at, nothing in FreeWallet has changed in the past week except updating to use 10.9.0.... at which point, it became clear MPMA was broken (fixed now, but no info on when it will be included in a hotfix release... just ignored by adam)... and now users getting errors from counterparty API about electrs (again, something ONLY used in counterparty-core)
-
Mm for me electrs has been traditionally a bit painful I have migrated to use fulcrum that worked better
-
so these issues fall squarely on the new counterparty-core release... not trying to get into a blame game... simply trying to report issues and get an answer on WHEN stuff will be fixed... but unfortunately, still seems ot be way to personal as I can't even get any response from the core devs on when the broken stuff will be fixed..... in the meantime, the users continue to suffer
-
thanks vector.. I reported the issues on github, and thanked for the fix... however, I get no response as to when MPMA will be fixed and 10.9.x stable... I believe MPMA being broken and costing users lots more in fees is worthy of a hotfix... I asked adam for any response and get ignored.... Are we just supposed to report issues and have no response or expectation of things getting fixed and included in a release?
-
not trying to argue... just want answers.... saying "Nope, that fix will be in 11.0.0 in 3 weeksa" is fine.... it will suck, but still will at least have an answer for users who ask why they cant use MPMA now because it broken in counterparty-core 3 weeks ago in 10.9 release
-
Just did a transfer using Horizon. Worked fine.
-
Got it... report bugs on github... wait for the black hole of dev to fix and put into a release, and expect no type of friendly response on when to expect releases, including hotfixes.
-
Thanks for the clarity Vector 👍️️️️️️
-
will leave here and just report on github I guess and publicize my github issues in the main CP channel... since it seems there is no expectation of actual support here... just "it works in horizon, and a release will be ready when it is ready"
-
30 messages? I thanked him for the fix and asked when it would be in a release and waited 6 hours for a reply... then asked for a reply
-
anyway., pointless to bicker in here.... got whta I needed... l8r
-
big of you to expect friendly responses after your last 18 months of friendliness, maybe reflect on how you've acted and think why people aren't quick to respond
-
@vectorconfetti it's worse than that. If any dev wanted to use that patch they could just run develop. Or a previous version with the v1 tx composer. No need to wait for the next release of course.
-
Sarcasm goes a long way
-
/s
- 04 February 2025 (94 messages)
-
Plz discuss any horizon related convo in the horizon channel, or is this the horizon chat
-
According to your leader, this isn't even the main counterparty room. So I'm not sure what marching orders you are following at the moment. But he is right, all the unnecessarily drama is quite tiresome
-
Leader, marching orders, what you been smoking
-
I just want to send assets and btc in the wallet I've always used, and getting cp api error messages
-
Issue was pinned on CounterParty core api systems. I was just noting transfers are possible.
-
Fixes are possible
-
I was joking, but seems bit fishy frw facing issues
-
I like unisat honestly
-
But do use Horizon for my CounterParty needs
-
Well I dropped the image to show what message we are getting, there's quite alot of people wondering what is the issue, I can't ask what is the issue in here?
-
@DOGESTYLEEE No one has reported any issue with Counterparty. Right now what you're talking about is an issue appearing only in Freewallet, so the appropriate place to ask is the Freewallet channel.
-
Why so many bugs/issues, seems like there's always something
-
That's a question for the Freewallet developer. Please keep posts in this channel on topic.
-
No I mean cp bugs
-
With all the 30 releases in last 12 months
-
I mean we've done a lot in the past 12 months... Hard to summarize that all here. The biggest issue is that the codebase was mostly unmaintained for almost a decade. That has taken a ton of work to repair.
-
For instance twelve months ago there were zero working tests for the whole codebase.
-
It was impossible to run a node.
-
There were rampant consensus bugs. Major performance issues. Etc. etc.
-
werent we relying on a bootstrap to reboot the network everytime something failed?
-
Yup. Was absolutely terrible. :/
-
How's atomic swaps?
-
I remember the days of pinging the old maintainer to reboot servers because nothing was working
-
Atomic swaps are now working really well. We released those in October. There were definitely some critical bugs associated with that release (too many!!), but we fixed them quickly.
-
the lack of keeping counterwallet up is what forced me to become a freewallet user, almost as if oh nevermind
-
Well I've never had issues with sends, multisends, creating dispensers until 2.0
-
whats 2.0?
-
you mean counterparty?
-
Cp2.0
-
@DOGESTYLEEE those are Freewallet issues :/
-
I don't know her
-
Well like creating dispenser from different address, now it costs more, more tx etc
-
There's no such thing as "Counterparty 2.0". see the FAQ. https://docs.counterparty.io/docs/basics/faq/#what-is-counterparty-20
-
I thought that's what you name you chose
-
lol no. it's just trolling
-
I think it's called projection...smokes harsh they say
-
So how does atomic swaps work, utxo?
-
This is also addressed in the FAQ. https://docs.counterparty.io/docs/basics/faq/#what-is-the-origin-functionality-that-was-recently-lost TLDR; there was a critical security bug that had to be fixed, and that means the effective BTC fee has to be 2x as high
-
Also in the docs (yay docs!) https://docs.counterparty.io/docs/advanced/how-to/atomic-swap/
-
Yh that's what I mean, lots of bugs or removing funcunality, but there's has been quite a few after releases, always seems to be other issues to do, is there more testing in future releases
-
Will give a read, cheers
-
@DOGESTYLEEE no real functionality was removed... see https://docs.counterparty.io/docs/basics/faq/#what-is-the-origin-functionality-that-was-recently-lost
-
and as I said, a year ago there was *zero* testing
-
now we're at 80% codebase coverage by the automated testing suite
-
and working on bringing that to 100% asap
-
but the codebase was ~unmaintained for 10 years, so that takes a lot of time and effort
-
Thanks for answering anyway, hopefully the issues will be fixed soon 👍
-
C3P0's mom?
-
I heard she gave him his silver leg
-
Hello, is someone running counterparty stack on kubernetes? Would like to chat about it
-
OT but relevant to future of CP:
https://x.com/danielgothits/status/1886550036252602514DANIEL GOT HITS (@danielgothits) on XTrump put THIS GUY in charge of the Sovereign Wealth Fund and you’re bearish?? Lol
-
Hey I've got a question about the trading price info on pepe.wtf info for individual pepes.
I suspect that Counterparty DEX orders are not included in this list for some reason.
For example, if on the JORDANPEPE list of available assets and last sales:
https://pepe.wtf/asset/JORDANPEPE
There are no prices listed in XCP.
I have a JORDANPEPE up for sale in XCP:
https://horizon.market/explorer/tx/cf7020febea7f6415a5e75e5aaff2bc974f5f131ed65cfe477a7b26712aab324
But it is not included in the list.
Any idea why this is the case or if it could be modified to included Counterparty DEX trading info?JORDANPEPE | Pepe.wtfDiscover the universe of Rare Pepes in Pepe.wtf
-
Think they removed freewallet/xcp and added horizon, so dispensers made in frw can be bought/seen on horizon, and show on wtf, but not xcp orders
-
Oah you can still see xcp orders, but it sends you to horizon
-
-
Sometimes it doesn't update on wtf properly, so when looking for floors check that there is for sale on eth for example
-
Sometimes it says floor 200 for example but the floor could be way off, like 600, so just double check the listing's on dispenser/dex/opensea to get accurate info
-
Buts seems to be showing yours as floor, sometimes just have to wait for it to auto update
-
Yeah, I noticed the numbers are pretty weird in some cases.
-
Hello guys, have you already checked ORBital, our CP marketplace?
https://orbital.market/
🐸We've already listed nearly 30 collections, including Rare Pepe, Fake Rares, Bitcoin Stamps, Spells of Genesis and much more!
And more collections will be listed soon...
💰Browser extension wallet connection
💱 User-friendly DEX interface
💹 Market data
🚨 SEND feature coming soon! 📨
Follow-us: https://x.com/ORBital_market for more updates.
Give it a try and tell us what you think, we'd be happy to hear from you!LinkORBital is the best Counterparty marketplace. Browse, buy, and sell Counterparty assets today.
-
How is the mempool so dead 3,700 unconfirmed txs
-
Never would I have thought Bitcoin would be at $100k with an empty mempool
-
Sure seems like it
-
Hell, Bitcoin might be dead
-
back it up bro its over
-
only mETH can save us now
-
Trumps son has spoken bitcoin is now dead
-
It’s digital security
-
its digital violence 😄 read softwar
-
only way to get these markets going is if there
-
's a big influx of money into the entire ecosystem
-
which means xcp go up
-
besides easyasset.art, what other options are there to add not only a picture but also music to a token? -
#stamps
-
Stampchain.io if you'd like to explore that technique
-
Great looking site
-
wip features and updates are ongoing
-
Community can participate. Github accessible
-
Joined. - 05 February 2025 (12 messages)
-
I still never used any from this list 😅
-
Ordinal?
-
IMGUR should just launch their own blockchain. -
-
iz a joke... a lot of CP asset art resides on IMGUR
-
Imgur is the best of all -
Not a bad idea tbh
-
true
- 06 February 2025 (67 messages)
-
Imweave
-
Self hosted json files
-
you can use this tool to create the json files:
https://robotlovecoffee.io/XCPJsonTool.html -
you can download it as it is all local, down in the browser
-
Yes. I would recommend that tool to other people for sure. I have already created a similar form but have not released it to the general public because it's not completely functional yet
When it comes down to it, I'd much rather have the ability to edit a text file on my server, than have to redirect to an entire new json file spending a Bitcoin fee in the process -
Individual control is the silver bullet
-
if arweave survies and is a peraweb then it is the best place for stuff. Yes it might not make it but there are a lot of other data points that want to be able to be placed on the web and not be taken down more than our jpegs and that give me hope that it will survive.
-
The economics just don’t feel sustainable. Incredibly cheap (a few cents of their token) for permanent storage. Also predicated on the idea that their shitcoin won’t do what every other shitcoin has done and gone to zero.
There are real costs involved and I’m not convinced the tokenomics work. -
stamps narrative getting desperate
-
Nothing to do with Stamps. Btw, you can hate stamps and also think arweave isn’t sustainable, GMONEY. You don’t have to simp for Arweave
-
Understanding Arweave's endowment: Exploration and Simulation - HackMD
# Understanding Arweave's endowment: Exploration and Simulation The Arweave network uses a novel fo
-
They have planned for 200 years (so they say), yes it could fail but I also think it could work, or at least there is a plan and thinking in place
-
I think there are use cases for a permaweb that could benifit many people
-
but also could be totally wrong and this all could crumble
-
10,000 years! Wow these guys are planning ahead. 10,000 years ago we were in an ice age using stone tools.
-
I’m not convinced Bitcoin will still be around in 200 years. Just look at the rate of change over the last 200. We can’t predict out that far with any reasonable assurance of accuracy
-
Also Arweave's protocol is simply incomplete. There's no penalty for not storing data you're supposed to 🤦♀️
-
Just looking at options I think it has a chance to be around longer than other options is all, not saying it is perfect at all just that I think IPFS will fail before in some cases.
-
yeah unfortunately there aren't a lot of good options
-
IPFS for one explicitly has zero data availability guarantees
-
More honest at least.
-
yeah I mean *everyone* treats IPFS as a data storage soln instead of just a data addressing + retrieval soln... and they don't exactly go out of their way to dispel the myth
-
I have found AW seems to be fast, or not dead slow as I have found with some IPFS systems once the data on up.
-
Records are stamped… -
You may want to correct Wikipedia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unusual_types_of_gramophone_records
"Side 6 of Boards of Canada's Geogaddi has an etching of a nuclear family for the track "Magic Window", albeit to replace the 1 minute 46 second long silent track that appears on digital versions."Unusual types of gramophone recordsGramophone records with non standard sizes or playback speeds
-
Record press
Machine for manufacturing vinyl records
-
Also you may have missed my joke… @krostue ? You know I appreciate the war of words with frens in here.
-
for as long as there are people that care about/ are invested in cp nfts, they can just host arweave/ whatever themselves
-
Thanks for the reminder that I should stay on topic
-
u are probably the only one
-
Hope so. Easyasset going down is a bad look tho. It's caused a big fiasco in other chats...
Artists need that tooling. RPW offering IPFS is awesome tho. Great work there..wish more wallets made it easy to simply upload file, convert to CIP25 standard and boom. Ez
Easyasset was nice because it was free... But that's probably why it failed... It relied on donation (though if someone made a replacement I really wouldn't mind throwing arweave for each mint to use it)
^ you add insta payment in BTC or XCP and it auto buys arweave would be even easier too
Not a website builder myself but just saying my two sats on the issue
Paid services for enhanced assets never really were successful from what I've seen.... Coindaddy offered it for a long time
Though nowadays paying thousands for inscriptions maybe changed the game idk
Furthermore it's so freaking easy if you take like an hour to figure out arweave JSONs... But not many artists have followed RobotLoveCoffee's tutorials on how to host it and create it themselves -
most people aren't aware of Counterparty at all. Alot still think punks are the first NFTs and a lot think Ordinals were the first Bitcoin NFTs
Maybe it's because Magic Eden has a Bitcoin tab but only shows Ordinals 🤷♂️ -
The person who created ipfs also created filecoin. I think filecoin stores thi.gs right?
-
yep. and that's the point, you need a currency to incentivize people to store data (which IPFS doesn't have)
-
storing "data" is a bad use case for blockchain
-
yeah the blockchain architecture isn't well suited for it. blockchains are state machines. but IMO the ecosystem does need something BFT for storing critical data ~forever. not to compete with S3 or whatever, like Filecoin tries to do, and not like Arweave which has the wrong design
-
It’s a database lol. By that rationale a database is a bad place for data
-
Glad you said it and not me.
-
BFT?
-
byzantine-fault tolerance
-
I literally read it as BTFO. Made sense
-
Lol
-
and blockchains are not very much like databases
-
the defining feature of a blockchain is state-machine replication
-
sounds very Softwarish... Adam gets it
-
Well it could be said it’s an append only ledger. It does store data anyway
-
The generals. Gotcha
-
lots of things are append-only ledgers but not blockchains
-
I can have an append-only ledger in a CSV
-
A state machine on top of an append only ledger perhaps is more accurate
-
the nerds don't understand what a state machine is lol
-
the state machine *produces* the ledger
-
it's a state machine on top of a *log*
-
I’d hash that
-
but if you have a decentralized replicated state machine over a distributed log with a byzantine-fault tolerant consensus protocol, then you have a blockchain
-
more specifically a timechain
-
Kind of both from different perspectives I guess
The Ledger is where all transaction data is permanently recorded, and the state machine is the method by which that recorded data is processed to yield the current state.
Just trolling gmoney anyway cuz spam lol the point was that it’s there to store data err spam -
sounds like you failed anyway 😆
-
-
Kek
-
- 07 February 2025 (8 messages)
-
Joined. -
Crowded tonight man......
-
-
fyi counterparty.io website is down. working with @ffmad to fix
-
fixed
-
Joined. -
Joined. - 08 February 2025 (4 messages)
- 09 February 2025 (2 messages)
-
Exchanges own a lot of counterparty tokens due to sellers withdrawing BTC to their address and causing an unwanted dispense. - 10 February 2025 (7 messages)
-
ha ya i found a bundle of those wallets by accident hahah i spoke to ndax about it and they said at this time they are not handleing them but nothing is out of the question because its all on chain ! -
19QWX putting in work on the XCP dispensers -
-
Approaching 1% of the supply
- 11 February 2025 (16 messages)
-
Nice to see someone else spanking the ask... Hella tempting under .0001 -
Sweep the dispensers boyyeee
-
Soooo cheap ffs
-
seems like dispensers are the ONLY thing people are actually using
-
Sweeping on cex too
-
Dextrade
-
Nothing of size on atomic swap
-
Really no supply left anywhere
-
Imagine you @pappyG45 were right... rwa registration on btc through xcp
-
But that also been xcp plan since day 1
-
Can't wait for the xcp comeback
-
-
True available supply probably is closer to 1,500,000 ~ 1,750,000 (a LOT frozen in exchanges, lost wallets, etc.).
-
ha there it is again fair dog!
-
- 12 February 2025 (12 messages)
-
Comma comma comma comma comma commalian
-
Is there high demand for bulk XCP?
-
Trustless OTC Trading · Issue #2968 · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core
Can this be done with PSBTs natively?
-
-
-
-
you could do that or just send it directly to the buyer in the first place to complete
-
Someone a little light on XCP
- 13 February 2025 (18 messages)
-
Aaand we just passed 3M txs 🔥
-
Just "noticed" something when looking at rarepepe sales (Jordanpepe).
It appears that 9 out of the last 10 trades were on Opensea.
https://pepe.wtf/asset/JORDANPEPE
It would be nice if the trading could be brought back to Counterparty, but...........JORDANPEPE | Pepe.wtfDiscover the universe of Rare Pepes in Pepe.wtf
-
It's essential for xcp/pc to pump for this to change. The reason nfts are on eth is because eth has a lot of money to spend on nfts.
-
It all comes back to this.
-
Why so many lettuce hands these days
-
Eth used to have good sales before migration of emblem vaults, now can't see price history on new vaults and all it shows is the lettuce hands
-
Counterparty will pump when it starts being used for something other than frog pictures. And that will give some of your frog pictures provenance. They'll see how much XCP and Bitcoin you wasted kek
-
Is eth used for something other than pump and pictures of cats?
-
Yeah it buffered bitcoin for a while for the Pedophiles that worship satan
-
🤣
-
HAHA - 14 February 2025 (29 messages)
-
I need technical support from the administrator,Thank you -
what is your issue, not an admin but might be able to point you in right direction
-
There are many talented and knowledgeable users here who are willing to help, such as @robotlovecoffee
Maybe go ahead and ask for what you need help with. Chances are there is more than one suitable answer and with a variety of perspectives you can choose which route is most suitable for your intentions -
Joined. -
Hello to everyone , I want to open a dispenser from freewallet . Is there any risk to open a dispenser for the other assets I’m holding ? Thanks !
-
I’m a noob with dispensers 😂😁
-
There is not
-
As a seller I believe there are no risks. -
Well, actually you need to open it in a different address
-
And be careful sending btc to that address
-
The amount of BTC you send needs to be inferior to the amount of the asset you are selling. I think this is still the case, feel free to ask any questions though.
-
Why?
-
So I need to move pepecash(example) from my main wallet to another wallet and then open dispenser?
-
It is good practice to keep one address just for what you are selling.
-
Let's say you sell 20 sats / pepecash. Everytime someone sends 20 sats+ to that address they will receive pepecash. Or you, let's say you need btc for fees. Everytime you send btc from another address that address will get pepecash.
-
But nothing technical, right ? Just a precaution ?
-
It used to be like that and I believe is still the case, but better to wait for the devs to confirm.
-
Thanks for clarification 😁
-
Thanks for the super clarification Vector !
-
I don’t need to receive BTC atm on this wallet , so can I proceed to open dispenser on my main wallet ? I’m selling something cause I need some BTC 😁
-
Thanks vector ! Thanks to everyone ! Happy to see a lot of people helping in just a few minutes
-
🫡
-
🛠️ Announcing Counterparty Core v10.10.0 🛠️
This release includes a complete rewrite of the entire test harness for Counterparty Core, as well as both restored and all-new integration tests and GitHub workflows for continuous integration. This release also adds support for Python 3.12 and 3.13, which means significantly improved performance overall. There are of course a number of bugfixes, especially for node stability when Bitcoin Core is overloaded.
This upgrade does not include a protocol change and is not mandatory. User-facing changes to the API include a decrease in the default output value for attach and move transactions to 546 satoshis and renaming the --testnet flag to --testnet3.
Note: If you are running a version lower than v10.9.0, you must first update to v10.9.0 and only then install v10.10.0 (!)
Full release notes are on GitHub as always: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/releases/tag/v10.10.0 -
None
- 16 February 2025 (5 messages)
-
Yeah with docker is very straightforward
-
new README on GitHub with badges. this helps keep us honest w.r.t. test coverage and deployment support, and it makes the project more inviting for new devs 🔥
- 17 February 2025 (10 messages)
-
XCP Liquidity on dispensers is thin as fuck 😄, something cooking ? 🍳
-
It's about buy-pressure, not supply
-
Yeah I know 😃😊🫡
-
Yeah I completely agree , maybe even more if altseason starts
-
thanks yeah there's an open issue! https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/issues/2211 and you're right now that AddrIndexRs is gone it's quite different all aroundDocument Hardware Requirements · Issue #2211 · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core
Counterparty Protocol Reference Implementation. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core development by creating an account on GitHub.
- 19 February 2025 (2 messages)
-
The existing list of verified dispensers looks nearly empty, so here is a new one:
https://cp20.tokenscan.io/tx/0b8fbc52d301a15317c1a4737863eadc767a7dee07ab712ff57e88d98a8e303d
300 XCP @ 0.000097 BTC ea. - 21 February 2025 (10 messages)
-
I found a bug on counterparty @vectorconfetti @teysol
On the fairmint I launched yesterday
https://horizon.market/explorer/assets/A95428957892599213?marketsTab=swaps
The sum of balances of holders is 93 but there are 114 valid fairmints. This means there are 21 lost tokens appearing in no one balance. Eventhough the supply is 120. -
It is noteworthy that Fairminter was largely oversubscribed. And there are a lot of failed tx
-
eratum there other are on dispensers
-
sorry
-
😀
-
@yodark I've filed an issue. We'll look into it: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/issues/3036Possible Bug with Fair Minting · Issue #3036 · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core
https://horizon.market/explorer/assets/A95428957892599213?marketsTab=swaps
-
yep. we'll double-check though.
-
yep, double-checked. it's just escrowed balances
-
Premint was 6; 114 valid mints => 120 total. Balances are only 93 because of escrowed values.
- 23 February 2025 (4 messages)
-
Thanks !
-
Is it possible to lock the asset description using message IDs / flags in the op_return? Is there any documentation about this? -
- 24 February 2025 (100 messages)
-
🚀Discover Seamless NFT Transfers on ORBital!🔥
Send your Counterparty collectibles in just a few clicks, directly from ORBital market! 📨
Learn more: https://youtu.be/OyuFJ_WweVI
Give it a try and tell us what you think, we'll be happy to hear from you! https://orbital.market/Discover Seamless NFT Transfers on ORBital!New Feature Unlocked: SEND! Connect your browser extension or your mobile app wallet and send your Counterparty collectibles in just a few clicks, directly from ORBital market! 🚀Fast, secure, and hassle-free! 🎉✨
-
Activity like sales and registrations seems to be drying quite up a bit. Maybe it is time to brainstorm how to collectively market the protocol to outsiders.
-
you mean registration of new tokens ?
-
Yeah. Rate has been getting slower. Leads me to believe that not many people are considering the protocol to publish new works
-
we are working on a cool minter and working on onboarding artists one of the barier is to mint on counterparty
-
What I’m asking is how can I lock the description field when constructing the Counterparty’s OP_RETURN issuance message.
-
I understand that description=lock is available, but I’m not sure exactly where to place it or if its position has any significance.
-
Building a private solution in an already crowded landscape is not quite the topic I was addressing. When your project is done, you are no doubt going to market it. But I don't feel that's the same as inviting new users, of all sorts, to the entire ecosystem
-
Nope, I’m generating my own OP_RETURN issuance message along with the whole issuance transaction
-
Using the cntrprty prefix
-
Yep, however I already have STAMP: in the description and want to lock it with the issuance
-
Are you saying that the description can’t be locked during the initial issuance if it already contains other data?
-
@teysol
-
Counterparty Core API · Apiary
A place where APIs are kept.
-
i think the parameter is just missing from the docs
-
also if you're constructing your counterparty messages manually the api is a good way to check your results
-
-
it looks like instead of adding a parameter you just need to use the old method of locking an asset to lock the description
-
so you cant lock the description on initial issuance otherwise you'd just have a blank locked description
-
you'd need to perform another action where you set the description to "lock" which would then lock whatever the current description is
-
Thanks for taking a look at this. Appreciate it!
-
That’s not ideal, to be honest. As an artist, if I allow others to mint my work, I’d want to lock both the asset and description at the time of issuance. Perhaps a separate parameter for this should be considered in the future.
-
hmmm if others are minting your work then they could choose not to lock anything?
-
Fairmint I believe is the case
-
couldnt you lock the description before your start the fairmint?
-
Artist creates their art. Community defines supply.
-
Not with stamps
-
The Stamp has to be restamped when locking at the end
-
For the CounterParty asset
-
the lock doesnt replace the description
-
it locks the previous one
-
On the stamp index it reflects as a new asset
-
the description doesnt change tho, why would it show as a new asset
-
With Stamps, I believe the artist should have the right to choose whether to lock their artwork or leave it unlocked at the time of minting.
-
i get that doing a second tx is a slight inconvenience but i dont understand how it prevents you from locking at the time of minting, its just two txs prior to setting up the fairminter or dispenser or whatever
-
As I mentioned, if I allow someone else to mint my artwork, I won’t have a second chance to lock it.
-
so allow them to mint your work after you lock it
-
This feels like the birth of a new asset class! 🙂
-
lol, by lock it i mean the description only
-
What makes this conversation confusing is the use of mint which is not canon. We are not using etherum. If you could use the proper words then maybe some clarity could be established
-
I tend to believe that a competent cryptoartist knows how to publish their art using the blockchain, instead of trying to make a blockchain functionality conform to legacy expectations
-
To be fair, the term mint is now part of the counterparty lexicon with the addition of fair minters
-
Is that your proposal for how we should collectively market the protocol to outsiders—without using the word mint? lol
-
I beleive the issue to bring new users is UI. So basically it is putting an UI on the "minting" feature that an artist can handle without owning a Phd 🙂
What happening under the hood is just using counterparty token issuence features -
I beleive we need to update the cannons. XCP is 10 years old and came before a lot of usecase that people are using today (NFT for example)
Typically "issuing an asset" is not a good name compared to "minting a token" or "issuing a token".
the today usecase are "minting a token" => "associating metadata" => "linking metadata to assets" -
the word asset is confusing ASF, even here internally among our devs we trouble defining data structure due the fact that "asset" is confusing
-
How about we try using it correctly first?
-
Industry has already defined creation of a digital asset is synonymous with minting
Counterparty General Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 Feb 2025 (36)
- 02 Feb 2025 (77)
- 03 Feb 2025 (37)
- 04 Feb 2025 (94)
- 05 Feb 2025 (12)
- 06 Feb 2025 (67)
- 07 Feb 2025 (8)
- 08 Feb 2025 (4)
- 09 Feb 2025 (2)
- 10 Feb 2025 (7)
- 11 Feb 2025 (16)
- 12 Feb 2025 (12)
- 13 Feb 2025 (18)
- 14 Feb 2025 (29)
- 16 Feb 2025 (5)
- 17 Feb 2025 (10)
- 19 Feb 2025 (2)
- 21 Feb 2025 (10)
- 23 Feb 2025 (4)
- 24 Feb 2025 (100)
- 25 Feb 2025 (26)
- 26 Feb 2025 (1)
- 27 Feb 2025 (43)
- 28 Feb 2025 (25)