- 01 November 2024 (39 messages)
-
there are so many YT videos out there -
Creator of the Rare Pepe Wallet & A Rare Pepe Scientist | Joe Looney & Shawn Leary
PLEASE JOIN OUR DISCORD! https://discord.gg/RB6QBWjh Please like, subscribe, and comment! NFT launch next week: giveaway link here : https://bit.ly/3BoW0PR NFT Culture @NFTCulture Please Join our Discord! Hit us up on Twitter for the link. Please follow @NFTCulture on Twitter and Instagram.
-
had to go to a dunkin’ donuts parking lot as we just randomly lost power at the house right before the stream
-
i want a John Villar AI. load up all of our tgram chats into it
-
i’m pumped for the founders coming back and making stuff happen to improve both the functionality which could improve adoption.
-
Anyone know the Tether ppl? We could have them load a few billie tethers onto the new and improved DEx 😁
-
this would be amazing -
im sure tether will support it
-
they first deployed USDT on OMNI
-
BTC sidechain
-
i've assets i want to migrate from xcp(freewallet) to eth, what changed ? do i need to take some precautions? thanks !
-
its the first time i do it :D
-
i don't want to lose my assets , then when there will be desktop horizon i will use that..
-
I ask of you to issue shares on Counterparty and distribute them out for further transparency. -
It sounds like you would like to create an emblem vault. You can still do that all the same. It is a send from your wallet to the emblem vault's wallet address, so no extra precautions needed.
-
thanks cornholio , so i need to go there https://emblem.finance/createcurated , select project and card and send the card to this address generated on the website?Emblem Vault
An entire wallet inside a token
-
That looks right to me.
-
thanks so much! if i will encounter some problems i will tell you :D
-
@jakegallen can help too
-
thanks so much!
-
You are not really migrating them. They still are xcp assets just wrapped in a eth contact so you can sell or buy etc. I think you know this just want to make to clear for others. You can also put many assets into one vault. -
thanks for the explanation ! :D
-
Counterparty Core Development Update
We're working on the upcoming Counterparty Core v10.6.2, which will include a protocol change to fix a number of outstanding issues esp. in the recently released features. Milestone on GitHub: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/milestone/44 This release will be fully backwards-compatible, except the new UTXO attach/detach API calls might still change (to make them simpler). We're adding significantly more tests for that feature, as well as for fair minting.
In the meantime, the last protocol change to fix multi-dispensers activated yesterday. Triggering a dispenser at an address where other dispensers were previously closed should be working again. 👌 -
None
-
Hello all. I am now get how to fairmint and my next question :
How to add price per fairmint in BTC sand ? -
IF you have any Emblem questions you can hit me up. We also have tutorials on the Emblem vault YouTube page and the @emblemvision twitter account -
thanks jake ! that's great
-
- 02 November 2024 (104 messages)
-
rare pepe are the future. ❤️
-
The past, present and future. -
yes, rare pepe are super magic .
-
i was thinking to the trumprare card now.. it was issued in september 2016 and there is a potential prediction inside the card . there is the word : WIN AGAIN. and it was before his first presidential election :D
-
rare pepe predicted the future? :D
-
GM frens! Started v10.6.1 in docker container and see “could not connect to backend at http://xxxxx@localhost:8332” messages in the logs. First time starting a node, do I just need to wait? -
Yes, doing attempts every other second. Maybe i just misconfigured something. Trying to spawn the node in akash
-
ah amazing!
-
Great initiative 🐸 -
Peter Todd did a full security analysis of Counterparty way back when
-
If there is no stamp it's not much data
-
I'd be happy to discuss this with him :) The original L2 was Lighting, which was—notably—stateless.
-
And he's always been a supporter of Counterparty. ❤️
-
best to ask Scrilla and Kane Mayfield about this - they commonly have to choose what to include in tokens, how much space it will be etc etc .... Scrilla previously did a GhostFakeKillah ordinal drop with this entire conundrum in mind -
FWIW we're going to going to be making it much cheaper and easier to store data in Counterparty transactions in the future using "modern" encoding methods. But ultimately it's still gonna be tough to put an mp3 on Bitcoin affordably. You'd have to use an aggressive compression algorithm to say the least.
-
-
always has been ways to do it with xcp - but the rest of the bitcoin nft community is OBSESSED with 'on-chain' - which is why people skim down and compress their mp3's so much to even fit it on an Ordinal
-
GitHub - LemonATsu/pop-to-8bit: A tool for converting pop song into 8bit chiptune song.
A tool for converting pop song into 8bit chiptune song. - LemonATsu/pop-to-8bit
-
the costs are INSANE for even small songs
-
The nice thing about the new encoding methods is that they'll be extra extra prunable, so to speak.
-
And costs should come down 75% immediately
-
probably. would take a lot of experimentation
-
*approximately* end of year, with some activation period. we've got about 100 open issues on the roadmap to tackle first
-
Joined. -
Hello
-
we've closed around 600 issues this year so far
-
hey @MrBitcoinBeast ! 👋
-
I've personally put about 500kB in a single inscription
-
Joined. -
-
10 Ordinal Metas Everyone Should Know
Leonidas breaks down the most important trends in the Ordinals ecosystem so newcomers can better understand the Ordinals market.
-
yeah I think it was actually 400kB
-
-
At this time... it's either you spend the vast amount of money to put it on chain...or you you use an off chain way to do it and pray you can convince the "on-chain" maxis to buy it
Just my two sats on the subject -
How about breaking it down into each individual track? You put each one on-chain with a final transaction that pulls them all together (just don't ask me how to accomplish this).
-
I forget what it's called, but pfp collections do something like this by first inscribing each trait
-
recursive inscriptions -
for those interested in our testing strategy, we've just implemented an advanced technique called property testing for the node: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/blob/95273ec485ee99e031527990a7811a01a5591b00/counterparty-core/counterpartycore/test/regtest/properytestnode.py https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/blob/95273ec485ee99e031527990a7811a01a5591b00/counterparty-core/counterpartycore/test/regtest/utxosupport_propertytest.pycounterparty-core/counterparty-core/counterpartycore/test/regtest/properytestnode.py at 95273ec485ee99e031527990a7811a01a5591b00 · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core
Counterparty Protocol Reference Implementation. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
What I'm imagining is say you have 16 tracks. You inscribe each track for ~200kb each then a 17 inscription that ties them all together.
-
and the 17th one is the one that goes to market and the 16 can be sent to a burn address so all that trades is the final, and you could make others using those 16 snippets
-
The 17th run is used for ORD: on Counterparty
-
yep
-
Yeah, Counterparty tokens can point to an inscription all the same as Ordinals does
-
Right now you can upload 1 MB to Bitcoin for 0.0045 BTC
-
But files more than 400KB cost at least a 2x Premium
-
Therefore. 4MB file is around 0.1 BTC
-
These may seem like high costs but it's actually extremely cheap at the moment
-
Also on litecoin it's $1 per MB
-
Joined. -
makes sense given the avg amount of fees paid per block right now -
is there a particular mining pool you know offering this service?
-
-
Oops.. gm
-
- 03 November 2024 (29 messages)
-
xcp.ninja is finally on Core >v10.4.0! 🎉 https://x.com/pifu7/status/1852820505130062231?s=46&t=oGl41DetqiEPq1-vSGOhIA
-
Apologizing for use of block space is not the right approach in my opinion. If a txn pays for inclusion in a block that’s enough. It’s valid. Saying it’s “small” so it’s somehow better than a big txn misses the entire point. We pay to be included in blocks based on a fee market. -
Marapool slipstream
-
Inscribe sorry.txt 1000000 times
-
Bigger is better
-
No apologies as there’s nothing to apologize for. Paying to use block space is all that matters. How it’s used is none of anyone’s business
-
Mike In Space (@mikeinspace) on X
Good overview of what’s been happening in Counterparty over the last couple years. Nice that @C0rnh0li0 has documented these forum posts so clearly as much of this would have otherwise been lost to history.
-
A little historic information about the 2014 Counterparty token 'LTBCOIN' - learn your Counterparty history here folks!
https://x.com/davesta_xcp/status/1852908921666904171 -
So the fork is over, except for that tokenscan and fw has it as an option? -
this would be great to have on the website. I'm not sure how to present it, but an historical section on the website would be really interesting (and shows the long history of CP)
-
has been my goal since day 1 :)
i know Damian just used the embed function to link the whole timeline - but inviting a graphic designer to do something artistic with it (and picking the main historical groundbreaking projects to include) would be awesome too!
https://github.com/davestaxcp/CounterpartyTimeline2023 -
Yeah, I know and you did an incredible work 👏.
The question is more that this is a lot of data, and how to display it in a easy way for the user to browse -
None -
Joined. -
This can be done directly
-
By doing a pull request on the content of the website. For example for marketplaces: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/Website/blob/master/src/content/marketplaces/marketplaces.mdWebsite/src/content/marketplaces/marketplaces.md at master · CounterpartyXCP/Website
Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/Website development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
If anyone has a platform that isn't listed, please add it 👍
-
(I still need to add back the projects page when I find some time in between Fairmints dev)
-
Cornholio the Great (@C0rnh0li0) on X
434e545250525459 CNTRPRTY 685623401c3f5e9d2eaaf0657a50454e56a270ee7630d409e98d3bc257560098 The first of millions of the moistest transactions on Bitcoin to contain this prefix. The start of the Proof of Burn. 1CounterpartyXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXUWLpVr 2,130.99062412 BTC
-
I share my thoughts as to why I believe the prefix is important and should not be changed
-
@jp_janssen has proposed shortening it to reduce the cost of transactions, but I believe maintaining that connection back to proof of burn is important.
-
gm - no, ended up losing the BTC that I sent. Wild - gonna fade this eco for now until stuff gets a bit more user friendly -
Joined. -
Sup goys
-
Sup Luis -
ffmad.xcp (@quentinbdb) on X
Is #FAIRSOUND the first musical #fairmint? 🎶 That's really cool @Zbyku! 🔥🔥 Check out this fairmint on @fairmints 🚀 https://t.co/fo3YTO52tj
-
probably the first musical fairmint?
- 04 November 2024 (133 messages)
-
Did you click the Play button?
-
The play button is a little hidden because of the image repeat. Will fix that
-
Scroll down
-
Where you looking, specifically?
-
btw, fair mints don’t necessarily require images. Many probably just don’t have them as these are seen as meme tokens
-
Similar to Runes. The ticker is the art.
-
It's not really either, as counterparty isn't a blockchain
-
yeah. I would say it's similar to a soft fork, as it's backward compatible
-
There is no CP 2.0. Just last version Counterparty v10.6 and some people keeping and obsolete version v9.6 called "Classic" for some reasons
-
the upgrade activated at a certain Bitcoin Block
-
It's a token by token fork. Certain actions result in an invalid tx on one side or the other, while being accepted on the other side.
-Opening a dispenser on an empty address on old versions
-Buying from a dispenser from a vanilla BTC wallet rather than an XCP wallet will only dispense the token on old versions.
-Fairmints and UTXO binding on the newest version
These are the actions that result in tokens being forked. -
upgrade was announced in september 1 month before upgrade on the network (which happened at block 866,000)
-
It should be noted that this is nothing new. If anyone uses an old wallet, you are potentially exposing yourself to similar risks.
-
For example, the update from 9.59 - 9.6 had the reset divisible asset function. Once an asset was reset, it was forked away from its previous self on all versions prior to 9.6
-
counterparty-core/counterparty-core/counterpartycore/protocol_changes.json at master · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core
Counterparty Protocol Reference Implementation. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
"only dispense the token on older versions"... Is this really a good idea? Can't the new version recognize when tokens are being sent to a "vanilla" wallet? -
I know it's already endured a lot of debate, but it should be an opt-in feature rather than a "my way or the highway" feature, IMO
-
Because I don't want to have to re-open 40-odd dispensers, that's why. Nobody does.
"All features work normally".. does that include recognizing token sends to "vanilla" wallets? -
Self-custody / is Saylor Moon still our friend?
In past years, Saylor has done much to encourage investment in bitcoin and raise its profile among both the public and institutional investors.
This is somewhat OT, but given that counterparty runs on BTC and that almost all counterparty assets are in self-custody, Saylor's recent "bait-and-switch" move towards institutional custody is surprising and worthy of discussion.
I listened to his comments in an interview today, which unfortunately I could not find, so instead I will share an article summarizing his current thinking.
https://coinmozo.com/michael-saylor-bitcoin-controversy-custodial-debate/
Key points from Saylor:
"In an interview with financial journalist Madison Reidy on October 21, Saylor indicated that Bitcoin holders would be better off entrusting their Bitcoin to major, regulated institutions such as BlackRock, Fidelity, and JP Morgan rather than attempting to hold it themselves."
Previously, Saylor "believed that keeping Bitcoin in self-control would prevent strong custodial entities from destroying the decentralized essence of Bitcoin."
His latest comments "imply that Bitcoin is safer in the hands of huge financial institutions, which are regulated and backed by lawmakers and government officials. He argues that institutions such as BlackRock, Fidelity, and JP Morgan offer trust and stability that private individuals cannot match."
"He dismissed concerns about confiscation as “paranoid” ideas held by “crypto anarchists.”
"Reidy highlighted the US government’s gold seizure under Executive Order 6102 in 1933. Those who advocate self-custody frequently point to this historical incident as a cautionary tale."
"Saylor disputed the parallel, claiming that........the government has no motive to take (seize) Bitcoin."Michael Saylor Bitcoin Controversy: The Custodial DebateMichael Saylor Bitcoin Controversy which created a trust in big financial institutions for self-custody, has recently triggered a debate.
-
I wouldn't even say a Counterparty wallet but send a bitcoin transaction with Counterparty data
-
On Fairmints we're using purely Bitcoin wallet like Unisat, they don't even recognize XCP natively. But can send dispensers or any XCP transaction 👍
-
So you're not considering Freewallet a "Counterparty wallet" anymore? Im really just trying to understand what's going on.
-
Well there's only 1 chain and that's bitcoin
-
It's not a chain so much as a database but I know what you mean.
So if you trigger a dispense on Freewallet it won't be reflected in Horizon wallet, or whatever the "modern" counterparty wallet is you're referring to. Is that correct? -
Ok AFAIK there is still just 1 freewallet
-
Nobody's sending me any links man 😅 I've been using Counterparty for over 10 years
-
I do understand. I'm just not thrilled that the modern counterparty won't recognize token sends to vanilla wallets.
-
Seems like it's easily implementable
-
Ok so I mean a send on the old version should be recognized on the new version... Is this how it will be?
-
More specifically a dispense send, regardless of what version
-
Right.. that I can live with. I just want to make sure dispense sends are being processed in both versions. It sounds like they are, so that's good.
-
For example, let's say someone buys something from my dispenser using Freewallet. Will that send be recognized by the Horizon wallet? Like the token balance will be adjusted on both ledgers?
-
Ok but there's only 1 freewallet. I didn't know about the plans for dual wallets. I will ask J-Dog about it.
-
Thanks
-
I would like to drop the idea of using "Classic" terminology. There is only current CP and then bad actors supporting tooling for older versions that will cause users risk. There is not reason to use tooling that is not talking to the latest version of CP.
-
100% get it
-
I just refer to it as 9.x as it is just a older version of the ledger.
-
No there are two
-
Literally zero people have expressed interest in running the old version. Even J-Dog has said he has had no reason to release it except as a sign of "protest". 🙄
-
What? Nothing has changed with asset sends
-
I think the best approach is to point users at other wallets wherever possible, with the caveat that there are still features that only Freewallet 2.0 supports
-
Japrog you don't need to run the fork to use the old, flakey, cheaper encoding for MPMA
-
J-Dog is intentionally conflating a number of issues, pretending that things are related to the protocol change that are not
-
So many counterparty classics!
-
Are counting the various versions of freewallet . io or including the freewallet . org which has eaten a lot of assets over the years?
-
The community pleaded with him to rebrand to avoid further losses, since the .org wallet doesn’t give access to private keys.
-
It baffles me that J-Dog keeps inventing ways for users to lose assets
-
That would make 3
-
Guys I have a question about the public node -
I get hit with "Too many requests" quite often
-
what are the rate limiting rules ?
-
@yodark you mean api.counterparty.io?
-
Too many requests is from all users ? or single IP ?
-
-
these are the rules we have for the public, free nodes
-
what is your usage pattern?
-
Parsing the full chain loading block per block when cathing up with the chain. Then call every 3 minutes to check if there are new blocks
-
but not fairmint
-
get_block_info
-
Why would you do that?
-
yep
-
@yodark you mean using J-Dog's PHP script?
-
yes
-
yeah you can't use a free, public, Internet-facing API for building up a whole middleware MySQL database. that's an extremely heavy operation.
-
yeah I can imagine. Nevertheless used the publlic coindaddy for long time without much issues
-
we have also our node but it's on the synchronization limbo (needs to recatch up)
-
You should use your local node for that operation.
-
once the service is caught up, you can probably use the public API again, but it's still a Bad Idea(TM)
-
like on the public node ?
-
ah you mean the node
-
1.5h about
-
Are you using bootstrap? -
Or reparsing your old db?
-
Reparsing is taking very long time
-
What is the reason for not just using the API instead of creating a whole new db?
-
because there are some advanced queries that we cannot use the API for since we need to join a lot of data
-
Can you give an example?
-
I believe that for long term would be good to report all this queries and add a way to use the API for getting them
-
Are you using the REST api? https://counterpartycore.docs.apiary.io/Counterparty Core API · Apiary
A place where APIs are kept.
-
get balance of SOG cards for a user.
Get the marketcap of rarepepe collection
For example -
I already have requested some sorting for some queries on GitHub and they have been added for the next releases
-
yes for some things yes
-
I've just loosed the rate limits significantly. It's still a Bad Idea(TM) to rely on such a service for building up the state of local middleware, but our node infrastructure can probably now handle much greater load.
-
🧡
-
Cool we will review the infra not to overload the public node
-
This is something you can get direct from API no? I’ve worked with the API extensively for both my wallet and explorer and haven’t found a call yet that I needed to poll db directly for
-
None -
None -
If only Roger Ver had kept his BTC with Blackrock, maybe "the government" wouldn't have asked Spain to take him into custody......😂
- 05 November 2024 (35 messages)
-
None -
Vote Bags 2024
-
@teysol some compose transaction generates a "upstream request timeout"
https://api.counterparty.io:4000/v2/addresses/14HXLcjkAnd2s4CG3rB2C9JQztcVmrWgtE/compose/send?destination=1ErPs9mwUXp8f8UffGnBreRmjcyJAW1FLU&asset=SOGMETA&quantity=1 -
it happens for certains address
-
My guess is it’s related to utxo selection
-
Joined.
-
okay yeah something is taking longer than some timeout
-
I think it's AddrIndexRs
-
yup, it is
-
not much we can do until we kill it. it's absolutely terrible
-
I'd say 3–4 weeks, roughly
-
Learn a little bit about TATIANACOIN, considered 'the first musical artist coin and the alpha for the concept of artist tokens' and issued using Counterparty in 2014.
Some amazing historical gems in this summary, including album art from Ross Ulbricht, a clip of Tatiana mentioning Counterparty within a John Stossel segment on Fox News and the eventual issuance of TATIANACARD in the Spells of Genesis collection.
https://x.com/davesta_xcp/status/1853896077658767794davesta.xcp (@davesta_xcp) on XOne of the earliest artist tokens on @CounterpartyXCP is TATIANACOIN and was issued on June 4th, 2014. https://t.co/3xh4N8sljA Tatiana Moroz (@queentatiana), a graduate of Berklee College of Music, has been a vocal advocate in the Bitcoin community since 2012. She was a part
-
😱 does it mean we can’t move assets until then ?
-
I remember in the past sending an utxo was solving this kind of problem
-
oh there are workarounds. the best thing to do is probably to get the list of UTXOs for the address from an AddrIndexRs alternative like electrs and pass it in to the compose call via the inputs_set parameter. we host a public instance of electrs here:
-
curl 'https://api.counterparty.io:3000/address/14HXLcjkAnd2s4CG3rB2C9JQztcVmrWgtE/utxo'
-
Horizon Wallet e.g. uses that for tx construction
-
@teysol Is there any way the issues between devs could be discussed in a long form moderated discussion on an X live?
If there is any way to resolve the differences, the community would only stand to gain from it. If no resolution is reached, nothing is lost. -
It's just a waste of time, it wouldn't resolve anything, it would only inflame things further.
-
Joined. -
There have been like three Twitter spaces in the last few months. Plenty of opportunity to join the conversation then. Now everyone needs to, yet again, capitulate with someone that has proven themselves, time and time again, to be non-negotiable? I would say, no thanks for the invitation for more drama.
Hahaha. I'm not a core Dev, but I ran out of patience for durrrdog long ago -
There's only 1 dev and his product/tool that is causing the confusion. Which he also provided access to the current 10.6, -
If I would put a number on devs, there's 30+ running 10.6 and maybe 2 who run 9.6, which neither are actively building products or improving
-
I've not heard leather, Okx, or unisat wallets complain/ throttle/censor our usage. And all 3 are opensource audited.
-
I've witnessed them throughout the last 1.5~ years
-
2 years in a few months
-
always stay focused and engineer the solutions and tooling. Just takes time...
-
this one is absurd after the last one, and the one before that and...
-
They should go all in on dogeparty
- 06 November 2024 (203 messages)
-
BTC seems to like Trump......BTC punched through ATH in yen this afternoon......ETH still stuck in a cheesy range 😂
-
So, it is still an issue -when I have several dispensers on 1 same addy- the buyer can trigger other dispensers while buying from one.. -
Thanks, I got it
-
@teysol
Is there any way the issues between devs could be discussed in a long form moderated discussion on an X live?
If there is any way to resolve the differences, the community would only stand to gain from it. If no resolution is reached, nothing is lost. -
Why is it that you are repeating yourself while ignoring input from other members here?
-
I appreciate the feedback, but the question was for Adam
-
This is the counterparty room. Where we all discuss counterparty.
-
I'm sure he is busy. Repeating in case he missed it
-
He's extremely active on github
-
Amazing work on the protocol improvements
-
Yes, he agreed
-
J-Dog was invited to speak with me on the Emblem Vault podcast. he declined
-
Imho it's Backfire effect on the cult of the personality. Cognitive dissonance theory in action. IMHO very educational to watch it all play out
-
Ok, if you were willing and he is willing, maybe some good could come from it
-
I told him I'd ask, he gave a thumbs up. I'd have to confirm he'd want to, but if you're willing I can at least let him know and you guys could see if you could work something out.
-
this isn't a "disagreement about ideas" or something like that. J-Dog is attempting to blackmail the whole ecosystem into re-introducing a security vulnerability into the protocol because he feels left out
-
I hear you, I just wonder if you two talking about it might lead somewhere good.
-
I feel like you keep refusing to listen to what everyone is telling you :/
-
I'm asking Adam Duncan.
-
Okay great you got his attention so let's move on?
I'm sure he will either message you or Jeremy or whomever as he sees fit. Thanks for understanding that circular logic is borderline on drama creation -
Duncan, I'm interested in what Adam has to say. Communication is a good thing, please stop trying to shut it down.
-
Jdog doesn't want a bug to be fixed, while any other dev working with Counterparty is happy to not have it anymore. That is all.
-
He does not need anybody to speak for him.
-
It's not just Adam
-
Dispenser logic chnages and atomic swaps were a year in the making...
-
This is not a conversation I wanted to have in private. It's a counterparty issue. This is the Counterparty chat.
-
I'm here taking time out of my day to explain things to you
for the benefit of everyone involved, maybe you could try to help keep the Jeremy fan club to the other dozen chat rooms where he constantly tries to spin his disingenuous yarn one illegitimate statement at a time -
Protocol and community in the best state it has ever been...
-
Since 2014
-
I bet the first years it was working quite well
-
READTHEROOM
-
None -
Hello, Suvangi here from Coinstore- a Singapore based cex.
Whom do i contact to discuss a partnership/ listing opportunity? -
If you would like to learn more about the project stick around please. You will learn that this is an open source endeavor that will not make an economic contract for listing
thank you for your time -
frens, how far out dex capabilities in horizon wallet? Is there any way to buy from dex?
-
Soon(TM) 😊
-
Perfect
-
As far as I understand it, the best way to interface with the protocol is via command line. I don't have links to share at the moment for a how-to. But I think that methodology is fully featured and the least political as it belongs to the core or something
-
Yeah right now we have a pretty friendly REST API, but ofc. many people aren't going to want to use that. We have a plan to rebuild the old, broken, defunct CLI though. Should be pretty easy with the v2 API.
-
firemints.xyz
-
this is the first platform to implement atomic swaps in counterparty, im sure more will come but at the moment if you want to test atomic swaps this is the place, i built it so if you have questions please let me know :)
-
Joined. -
After replay protection is added the two ledgers will stop copying each other correct??
-
Excellent
-
open for buying :D
-
Can't wait till this 2.0 version of counterparty is separate from muh Pepe's.
Thinking about burning all the 2.0 fork copies and keep the original OGXCP versions.
But I'll sell ya dank AF OG Pepe's on original counterparty/classic once wallet is ready.
Till then I don't want muh art diluted so I'm trying not to generate TXS on the fork version. -
🐸🪖🙏💚
-
Big Bcash vibes there
-
betterr selling me the fork assets than burning sir
-
BCash? 🤔What's that?
-
-
Bitcoin cash, Jdog is doing his best interpretation of Roger Ver right now
-
But let's stop talking about old versions of the software
-
🤔
-
BCash was fork off Bitcoin?
Like counterparty 2.0 from counterparty right?? -
Yup, it didn't want to upgrade. It died. End of story, except the one who believed this was the "real Bitcoin" lost a huge amount of money
-
Upgrade or die
-
Yeah, Bitcoin cash turned out "great" for those who went all-in and sold their BTC and held the Bcash.
-
That's just how things work in Blockchain
-
Wait? What?? The fork was off from original counterparty I thought??
-
why is the classic done in v9.6 and not in v1??
-
thats my real question classic is classic
-
The worse part was the Bitcoin . com website selling Bcash as the real Bitcoin
-
v1 of counterparty is the classic lets spin a node in that version
-
Lot of newbies were burnt by this
-
What do you mean.
The Software forked. There are two separate ledgers now since 2.0 forked🤔?? -
What am I missing?
-
There is no v2
-
There is just the main version, and some people running obsolete versions
-
Forks are off the main chain.
BCash forked off BTC.
2.0 forked off classic.
Those are facts not market speculation right?? 🤔 -
there is current counterparty and out of date counterparty, drink if you dare
-
sometimes the milk is still okay, other times its chunky
-
The 2.0 fork isn't working though. It has made bugs??
-
it works fine
-
Why so many updates since launch??
-
Joined. -
There wasn't a real single update in counterparty for years, sir -
works fine and works perfect are two different things
I'd ask you to show any previous version release that was perfect -
Is this a spoof room? Like the onion?
I'm being serious trying to learn and you guys make no sense?? -
The fork already happened. 2.0 IS the fork
-
CounterParty 10.6.1
-
What am I missing??
-
you drank the koolaid I see
-
There is only 1 CounterParty
-
Exactly
-
Then those who choose to experiment on obsolete versions.
-
Classic
-
+30 dispensers and +70 dispenses in 3 days
-
Like coke classic
-
Dispensers works perfectly
-
Not coke 2.0
-
It didn't sell and caused cancer or something right??
-
Collectors and market won't give value to the outdated version. I can tell Pepes there are worth zero
-
(Spoke to many big collectors)
-
10.6.1 works amazing with Leather, OKX, and unisat
-
I have been using XCP as a savings account on limited budgets with a family to feed.
I care tons about what's happening and an trying to understand -
If you care, follow the consensus, or you will lose money. It's as simple as that. And everyone runs the latest version of Counterparty.
-
I'm trying to understand how long till muh art and XCP get separated from this ridiculous fork 2.0....
Muh dispensers I can't even close from main addy anymore....
And I have to send funds to each addy now to close them...
The dispensers stopped working correctly after 2.0 fork happened. Funds would arrive but not trigger dispenser. This almost cost me 350$ of xcp that I sent to dispenser that didn't trip. Luckily the owner sent them manually.
I haven't been doing TXS since because of paranoia of loosing money in fees.
Now I just want to know how long till the fork 2.0 version adds replay protection??
🪖🙏💚 -
What's the latest node count?
-
So I can move on
-
Wait?? Doesn't the fork add replay protection??
Like BCash?? -
😱
-
@Arvik78 please stop the trolling
-
This is so confusing.
I really wish the fork version 2.0 had better initial testing because it has some great tooling and counterparty really needs a diverse environment of choices with tooling -
this is a channel for actual discussion of actual reality
-
Wait?? Me??
I'm not trolling.
These are genuine questions -
In another topic, with Fairmints we run a raffle on Dispensers market on PEPEFAIR to try and check everything works well, in 3 days:
- 18 dispensers opened
- 53 dispenses -
I looked up BCash and am starting to understand more
-
Everything worked well
-
And people used same address to open dispenser and buy at the same time
-
What are you taking about?
-
From FW we open as many as we r want or close with one tx
-
That's why I like classic better than the fork
-
I'm trying to understand why the fork isn't adding replay protection??
-
-houston, Counterparty is a decentralized project. The development of Horizon Wallet is completely independent of fixing the bug that required the additional transactions for opening dispensers on empty addresses.
-
💚🙏
-
Jdog is adding it
-
You have your answer
-
Horizon is the only wallet that works with the fork I thought?
-
You can now go in peace
-
Or be kicked out
-
What am I doing to get kicked out I'm trying to understand why the 2.0 fork is waiting so long to add replay protection?
-
this has been answered
-
no sir now you can use many others unisat, okx, leather, unishat, phantom....
-
Dozens of wallets 🔥
-
We really gotta think about the people being fooled into a cult of personality and try to find a way to bridge their being misdirected so they can see how they are being played
-
This is SO much like Bcash
-
thats where we need to be good enough and care enough
-
And the Roger Ver cult
-
It's crazy
-
I know we can do it
-
Pepes there are worth zero. Market will teach.
Counterparty General Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 Nov 2024 (39)
- 02 Nov 2024 (104)
- 03 Nov 2024 (29)
- 04 Nov 2024 (133)
- 05 Nov 2024 (35)
- 06 Nov 2024 (203)
- 07 Nov 2024 (137)
- 08 Nov 2024 (32)
- 09 Nov 2024 (68)
- 10 Nov 2024 (90)
- 11 Nov 2024 (149)
- 12 Nov 2024 (39)
- 13 Nov 2024 (13)
- 14 Nov 2024 (39)
- 15 Nov 2024 (20)
- 16 Nov 2024 (32)
- 17 Nov 2024 (24)
- 18 Nov 2024 (24)
- 19 Nov 2024 (119)
- 20 Nov 2024 (112)
- 21 Nov 2024 (40)
- 22 Nov 2024 (32)
- 23 Nov 2024 (35)
- 24 Nov 2024 (66)
- 25 Nov 2024 (39)
- 26 Nov 2024 (36)
- 27 Nov 2024 (12)
- 28 Nov 2024 (2)
- 29 Nov 2024 (10)
- 30 Nov 2024 (14)