- 12 July 2023 (16 messages)
-
None -
Joined. -
Helloo, thank for creating it!
-
of course 🙂
-
Joined. -
Hello
-
-
Joined. -
Welcome to the Official Telegram for Freewallet (Developed by @jdogresorg). We don't DM, we solve issues publicly in chat.
English only chat. If you are looking for BTNS info and discussion please visit: https://t.me/BTNS420
- The official Freewallet website is https://freewallet.io/
- Freewallet Desktop is the preferred version with the most features: https://freewallet.io/#updates
- The most recent Freewallet Desktop Version is v0.9.31: https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/releases
- If you need general Freewallet support or have questions please first visit:
> The Freewallet 0.9.31 User Manual/FAQ: https://davestaxcp.gitbook.io/freewallet.io-user-manual
> The Counterparty Docs: docs.counterparty.io
> The Counterparty Forums: https://forums.counterparty.io/
> the "Issues" section of the Freewallet Desktop Github: https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues
Please DO NOT just tag Jdog for an issue you have not researched thoroughly yourself and have not already posted in the "Issues" section of the Freewallet Github. It is important we have documentation of issues on the Github.
This space is intended for the community to help new users and be a resource to help create better FAQ's, document issues and brainstorm ideas.
- Some issues are solved easily and are heavily documented in the links mentioned above, but in some cases you may be the first to experience a bug. In this case make sure you make a detailed and thorough explanation in your post on Github of the issue so it can be tested and recreated:
https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues
- Be nice! This project runs off of donations as do Counterparty protocol updates and is mostly supported by its users. It may be some time before someone that can help will reply! 🤓
- If you have any ideas on how to make Freewallet better, more user friendly or want to express your thoughts, go ahead and post about it in the "Discussions" page of the Github: https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/discussions
For a more general chat about the Counterparty protocol please use the Counterparty Chat: https://t.me/Counterparty_XCPFreewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop · Discussion #138It has been asked for and needed for some time now, so I present the - Draft 5 of the Freewallet FAQ I used Freewallet Desktop v0.9.23 to write this up with the help of the Counterparty Forums, Cou...
-
None
-
Joined. - 13 July 2023 (18 messages)
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
sock
-
sock
-
Left.
-
Left.
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. - 14 July 2023 (19 messages)
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
Why do I keep getting error while trying to broadcast Send transaction on free wallet?
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
Broadcast error is specific issue with ur address not a Cp issue…. The wallet is generating and signing the tx fine… so not a freewallet issue
-
Maybe related to ur pending txs…. Open debug console… copy signed tx… broadcast urself via a tool like https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/pushtx/
-
Should tell u error when trying to broadcast… tldr, it’s an issue specific to ur address n txs… not an issue with freewallet
-
I'm trying to send b Tc from my counter party wallet. And I keep getting the same broadcast transaction error no details. Sending less than what I have in my wallet.
-
When you say it's an issue specific to your address... What do you mean. Every wallet is pretty straight forward... Send amount to address add transaction fee and hit send. What am I missing
-
Follow the directions above to get to an error message that will tell y why your having issues… the tx is generated and signed fine…. But rejected by the btc network… u gotta find out why… by following the above instructions
-
Joined. -
@davesta this is another question I get a few times a month…. Adding it to the FAQ would be awesome! ❤️👍🏻
-
I’ll work on getting better error messaging around broadcasts…. https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues/45Broadcast errors · Issue #45 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Need to get more helpful error messaging to bubble up to the surface in Freewallet... so errors are not a black hole.
-
There's also inconsistencies on the desktop version when you change the amount of btc Being sent the dollar value doesn't reflect the proper change.
-
There are a number of issues with the wallet which are documented in the "issues" section on github.... https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issuesIssues · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Desktop wallet for Win/Mac/Linux which supports Bitcoin and Counterparty - Issues · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
-
if you discover issues, check if the issue is already documented... if so, weigh in on the issue to say it is also an issue for you.... if no issue exists, create one with full tech details on what your issue is and the steps to repeat the issue.... if there is truly an issue, and it is able to be repeated, it should get fixed eventually.
-
Is there a way to see or export all wallets accessible by a seed phrase ?
-
I assume you mean with non-zero balance cuz otherwise it’s a staggering amount of possibilities
- 15 July 2023 (10 messages)
-
yes JPJA made a tool for this
https://github.com/Jpja/XCP-Export-SegwitGitHub - Jpja/XCP-Export-Segwit: Export addresses (legacy and segwit) with private keysExport addresses (legacy and segwit) with private keys - Jpja/XCP-Export-Segwit
-
It could be a UTXO issue as described here: https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#error-while-trying-to-broadcast-send-transactionFreewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
@TitaniumP its very common on Counterparty addresses to build up UTXO's. While you see a total BTC in your account it is actually many small UTXO's that make up this total balance. Imagine it is 1000 pennies and not $10 total. This is a common error to have freewallet not be able to create a transaction if the correct amount of BTC (not in pennies) cannot be obtained on the address, let me know if this documentation helps that I posted
-
to get around this specific USD rate showing correctly, I just cancel the tx popup Freewallet gives me, hit the refresh button and create the tx again. Freewallet will tell you on the bottom left of the app the last time it has updated its data (which BTC block it is at).
-
Though sometimes in some forms the USD amount will not automatically fill when changed. In this case I just verify myself the conversion rate for BTC manually
-
Will take a look - thank you
-
sick sock
-
Joined. - 16 July 2023 (6 messages)
-
-
I paid 1584 sat for a fee, but it took 6750?! How? 🤔 Freewallet offered to pay 1590 before I corrected
-
Joined. -
Screenshots showing every step of the process and good documentation on the issue is best way to identify issues…. Saying “wallet said x” isn’t good enough…. Wallet only does what it is told… if you find that is not true, please document the issue.
If the wallet was spending funds when it wasn’t supposed to, more ppl would be noticing and upset…. The wallet is open source for a reason, so anyone can verify nothing nefarious is happening.
TLDR… if there is an issue, come with all evidence of an issue, and create a GitHub issue for it and wait for the issue to get confirmed/fixed 👍🏻 -
This is something I have heard reported before, but as Jdog expressed, this isn't happening to everyone and seems like it would be more prevalent if a bigger issue. But assuming you are correct in diagnosing your problem, since the process usually doesn't involve getting screenshots this one is difficult to debug as we only see the evidence of the sent tx. Like Jdog mentioned, the best way to go about this would be to recreate the issue with screenshots of what Freewallet showed you and then a tx confirming this issue that link up to the screenshots. Posting that in the "issues" tab of the freewallet github is the place to post it: https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issuesIssues · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Desktop wallet for Win/Mac/Linux which supports Bitcoin and Counterparty - Issues · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
- 17 July 2023 (65 messages)
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
If it isn't a new wallet.
-
hey I have a pending btc tx at 3.06 sats I want to speed it up
-
And you know you have Sufficient BTC,
-
shows the balance
-
Then it's about Your BTC sitting on multiple UTXO ledger recordings
-
Have to use side tool electrum
-
To consolidate your balance
-
You'll see when you load up in electurm. Feature Bump fee.
-
When you select your TX
-
And raise the fee to compensate your Bitcoin being on multiple OTXOs
-
what fee would you suggest if intial tx was at 3.066 sat
-
25
-
30
-
Next block
-
got it ty
-
$3,4 fee could be more. Depending on how many Ledger recording you have.
-
I've paid upwards of $25 but mempool was high and had my wallet was a mess
-
Just practice consolidating your balance
-
i got everything figured out! thanks for your help
-
🫡
-
this could possibly be a new feature in the future: https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues/18Replace-By-Fee (RBF) support · Issue #18 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Would be nice to have RBF support in the wallet and have a simple solution available for users who complain about their transactions being pending. https://medium.com/@overtorment/bitcoin-replace-b...
-
it has also been proposed to show fee's in sat/b if the user wants to
-
ability to set fee in sat/b instead of absolute · Issue #12 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
I would like to set the fee in sat/b instead of only being able to set absolute values. This would include the option to send 0-fee transactions.
-
Both should be applied.
-
it helps to voice your opinion on the issues section of the github
-
as not every user of Freewallet has a Telegram account
-
I'm just a reader.
-
I read read alot of Discussions
-
I do not code. But would be considered an knowledge user
-
choosing to be apart of those conversation only helps the other people who only read
-
Theory, understanding, application
-
the github is open to all types of users, coders or not
-
Maybe I Consider making a user account.
-
To spend unconfirmed coins, use the flag --unconfirmed. (Unconfirmed coins cannot be spent from multi‐sig addresses.)
-
I wrote a couple FAQ's about this error
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
Feel free review that section of the FAQ questions to see if it helps your understanding of BTC fee's in Freewallet
-
And honestly I've gotten around this error just by clicking broadcast really fast.
-
I had enough BTC. I had consolidated my Full balance, using Electrums Full Send option. As it minuses the fee itself.
-
My server settings were good
-
Rage clicking. It sent
-
If you have any feedback or would like to propose a change or addition to the FAQ please feel free to do so
-
i have been asking for a community audit since it was drafted
-
I'll read over it
-
Jdogs files go deeep
-
thank you, that is a huge help
-
yes. yes they do
-
I get lost in discussions
-
same
-
forums go deep too
-
But to understand StampChain I had to go further
-
Freewallet is an Amazing tool
-
Has room for growth. And if wanted users onboarding can enter massive numbers.
-
I like it.
-
Freewallet is MILES better than counterwallet
-
100%
-
The Dex, and Dispenser, alot of tools. Well at least the Desktop version.
-
It is my intention to in the future get this FAQ on the official counterparty docs website to show counterparty heavily supports the most popular and functional wallet on Counterparty
-
Id really like to push new users to learning this application as it has so many features people dont know about
-
let alone how many upgrades are coming in the future to Freewallet AND Counterparty
-
lots of developing going on rn
-
Joined. - 18 July 2023 (4 messages)
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. - 19 July 2023 (2 messages)
-
Joined. - 20 July 2023 (4 messages)
-
Left.
-
Joined. -
Joined. - 21 July 2023 (5 messages)
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. -
i know we're all gonna have notes or bugs or suggestions or santa's wishlist... but i do wanna also say FW is my MOST functional wallet by far
if an ETH wallet could do what FW does there would be more joy in the world -
- 22 July 2023 (2 messages)
-
Joined. -
Joined. - 23 July 2023 (36 messages)
-
Joined. -
gm
I have an error when I try to change description of a token in freeWallet. I tried a few times but it is not working "error broadcasting". -
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
just posting that again for reference
-
which version of Freewallet are you using?
-
It is an old one.
-
try using the recent version instead (0.9.23)
-
Releases · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Desktop wallet for Win/Mac/Linux which supports Bitcoin and Counterparty - jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
-
Ok thank you,
-
its the most up to date version and a significant amount of issues have been resolved just by upgrading to the recent release
-
cheers mate feel free to ask if you have any more issues
-
Joined. -
Issues · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Desktop wallet for Win/Mac/Linux which supports Bitcoin and Counterparty - Issues · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
-
^ recently added some issues I noticed (and some potential upgrades) such as features like: "Show ALL open DEx orders" tab to be introduced as well as "Keyless entry" for priv key's and 12 word phrases as was the case with Counterwallet
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. -
I updated and it works. But I can't see the adresses I created before. I had some dispensers with valuable assets. I hope I can get those adresses back.
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. -
Too late to review and make any suggestions on?
-
No! Please do. That's what the GitHub is for. Check pinned too. Would love a critique of the FAQ too
-
glad the update worked! - JPJA made a tool to export all addresses (and keys) created with a 12 word phrase: https://github.com/Jpja/XCP-Export-Segwit
Freewallet will only import those first 10 Legacy and first 10 Segwit. Any imported addresses (like from emblem vault cracking etc.) will have had to have been saved individually with their individual private key.GitHub - Jpja/XCP-Export-Segwit: Export addresses (legacy and segwit) with private keysExport addresses (legacy and segwit) with private keys - Jpja/XCP-Export-Segwit
-
i wrote about this specific 20 address portion here: https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#displaying-the-seed-phrase-and-private-key-of-your-addresssFreewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
Basically addresses beyond the original 20 that are "created" by clicking "create new address" are going to be still backed by your 12 word phrase even though Freewallet didn't load it initially. Any imported address will not automatically load as it is backed by a different 12 word phrase. It is recommended to save the specific private key for any imported addresses. Let me know if you have questions
-
Thank you for the answer. How can I load the beyond 20 addresses (created inside freeWallet) so they can appear in the address list of the updated app ?
-
Any critiques seem like they will be sublte and up for discussion... I'll probably learn 10x what I critique. What's the best way to give feedback, and would you prefer I wait until I've gotten through the whole thing or mention things as I come across them?
-
you can reply to the FAQ - theres been some critiques there already - for general stuff use the Issues on Freewallet github
-
you would "import" the addresses using the import function once you recovered the private keys
- 24 July 2023 (25 messages)
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
Hey guys,.this morning I opened freewallet and I can only see the first 10 addresses...
-
Do you know why?
-
Only addresses created in freewallet, nothing imported
-
I have the same issue as brocciu, I have dispenser on the others and would like to retrieve the assets
-
which version? did you upgrade versions like brocciu?
-
you can use this tool to propagate all addresses and private keys if you have some missing
-
please review this in detail as i explained this issue in the FAQ
-
to import the keys that arent showing review this tutorial: https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#viewing-creating-and-importing-addressesFreewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
Updated and it worked
-
great to hear!
-
For some reason I had to "add them" back
-
Thanks guys
-
did you do it by just clicking "add address"
-
and they automatically added in the order as before?
-
Yep, exactly
-
ok cool im gonna add that to the FAQ
-
Now I have to understand how many I have to add to retrieve everything 🤣
-
as a frequently asked question on the bottom
-
-
A lot of small dispensers nothing fancy 🤣
-
Joined. -
-
- 25 July 2023 (23 messages)
-
can it be that in the newest freewallet-version the multisend-function via trezor hardware wallet doesn't work proper? i can't process it, tried many times. with normal addresses from the same wallet no problem, just via hardware wallet not possible atm. always stucks here...
-
you are using v0.9.23?
also how many line items on the multi-send are you trying to do? 15? 100?
I haven't seen this error yet with hardware addresses so this would be new to me. -
Joined. -
actually with more research I see this has been referenced before on the Github issues:
-
Trezor One MPMA support · Issue #124 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Adding MPMA support for Trezor One (The third most important function for hardware wallets after send and sweep). Currently, Trezor One users are forced to either send assets one by one, or sweep t...
-
looks like this was just with a multisend with 2 assets here
-
Do singular sends still work?
-
okay good to know
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
Joined. -
-
Freewallet Desktop v0.9.23 is the most updated version
-
-
Mobile was last updated March 15, 2019
-
-
Desktop version last updated May 4th, 2023
- 26 July 2023 (57 messages)
-
Joined. -
hello, if i used a low fee to send btc from freewallet is it possible to change the fee?
-
I'm gonna forward my previous response just for others to see
-
you can discuss this more in detail in the Freewallet TG: https://t.me/freewallet_io
But seeing you are referencing the "unconfirmed flag" I think its possible you may be running into this issue: https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#failure-to-send-not-enough-btc-in-wallet
Though from your information I believe it may just be a "use a bigger fee next time" type of situation. Since XCP tx's are all BTC tx's it relies on the mempool data and accurately choosing a fee that will be confirmed faster on average.Freewallet.io ChatThis is a channel to discuss FreeWallet and ask questions and let the community answer
-
but I have heard of using electrum wallet to do what you are looking for
-
thanks 😄
-
i am just not as educated with that feature and cannot help from here
-
though I do know it is a question asked a good amount of the time so I may look into it more
-
i am rather curious about the —uncofirmed flag and how to set it in freewallet
-
Is this BTC tx super urgent? How many sat/vb was the tx
-
freewallet set it to something like 4 sats/vb
-
and current requirements are like 10sats/vb
-
this is just shown and doesnt necessarily relate to your issue, as i believe it references specifically for multisend addresses
-
not urgent but i was curious about the —unconfirmed
-
it references if you are using a multisig wallet
-
or if it expires at some point in future and then my funds are available again
-
which is very very rare for a user to use
-
this is correct
-
it will get "dropped" from the mempool after some time if not confirmed
-
i see
-
so i see after 24h it should expire
-
this is a BTC type 'feature' and less an XCP thing
-
yep
-
it may take longer or shorter, but its best to use very high fee's on very important sends with BTC or any XCP asset
-
and here i was thinking i can overwrite it by setting a higher fee on same tx
-
I think you can "speed it up" but it may be costly
-
and i am less versed on how to do that
-
best answer is to wait if its not "life or death" situation
-
and make sure to use a higher fee in the future which might not be the answer you are looking for but is all i cant help with at the moment
-
ill keep in mind in the future to check the current fee costs
-
usually the High setting is very accurate, but many users go even higher on the fee - sometimes 2x-4x the fee "just to be safe"
-
users that use low fees are usually doing large batch orders on the XCP dex
-
and arent concerned how fast they confirm
-
but its kind of a "expert level" choice they make to save a few bucks here and there
-
i used high fee option but it didnt calculate it properly
-
which version of Freewallet are you using?
-
0.9.23 on mac
-
I know older versions had this issue: https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues/150multisend fee issue on v0.9.19 · Issue #150 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
@AdeKrypto mentioned as issue with Freewallet v0.9.19 automatically sending with a fee of 0.00001 BTC instead of the desired fee entered. In this case 0.00005 Video: cryptoace_compressed.mp4 Tx ID:...
-
interesting. As with that issue post, we found that was happening on 0.9.19 and the user had a video to show the process and we checked it with the sat/vb on the tx after
-
getting evidence like this is super helpful for us to recreate the issue
-
but I have not heard this happening with 0.9.23, as many users solved this issue by upgrading to the recent release
-
if you see this, remember it is just a recommendation and the mempool can change drastically and fast (as we saw with ordinals and stamps hype)
-
I tried to explain it in detail here: https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#what-btc-fee-should-i-useFreewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
^ let me know if this helps or can be expanded upon
-
It has also been asked to show the fee in sat/vb in Freewallet and I definetly see a need for that as well for users who are most used to deciding their fee in that manner
-
ability to set fee in sat/b instead of absolute · Issue #12 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
I would like to set the fee in sat/b instead of only being able to set absolute values. This would include the option to send 0-fee transactions.
-
interesting
-
it seems that electrum support child pays for fee to speed up tx from legacy wallets
-
searching this in the Counterparty Chat I am seeing the tool you are looking for (Child pays for Parent) is the correct terminology, though some users say it works and some say it doesnt always work.
-
I havent used it or tried it so I can't say from experience only research at this point
-
Sending yourself btc doesn’t solve the issue really if you send from an external address…. But if you send all btc from yourself to yourself, it should force pending tx to confirm (child pays for parent)
-
Feel free to get other advice on this, but my take is any subsequent transaction (either just sending BTC to yourself or a Counterparty action) with a high enough fee so that the two fees added together divided by the two transactions sizes added together will make for an attractive fee rate, compared to what you're seeing in current blocks... If it was a pretty basic/small transaction size, shouldn't take a lot of extra fee (maybe just double the suggested high fee)... but if it was a stamp mint or something, then will take more fee in the new transaction. At least rates are pretty low right now. Note this is basically child-pays-for-parent (CFPC). Mempool.space will show an effective fee rate after you do a subsequent transaction, and you'll want that number to be looking reasonable.
-
Child Pays for Parent .. spend the unconfirmed output from your linked transaction, send it to yourself with a large enough fee to increase the fee on the unconfirmed pareent transaction
-
thats some information from other users, and I think I will add this to the FAQ as another question as it seems very common
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
🤙
- 27 July 2023 (4 messages)
-
Joined. -
Joined.
-
While no expert, I think you have to wait a lot longer than 24 hours for a TX to drop.
And while I never see anyone suggest this (there must be a reason), I've successfully bumped many CP transactions with CPFP from FreeWallet by doing anything with a high enough fee to make the effective fee rate of the combined transaction attractive to miners. I'd love to hear why this isn't great, and why everyone suggests Electrum... there must be a reason.
OH, just realizing I'm in part of the quote above! - 28 July 2023 (15 messages)
-
This definitely worthy of a @jdogresorg look over, though I went ahead and posted this on the Freewallet issues section for documentation: https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues/151Signing a TX - input: legacy - Output: native segwit · Issue #151 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Below was mentioned as an issue with signing Tx's by @openstamp_support on Telegram: Hi. We have an issue when try to use freewallet to sign a transaction with a legacy address as input and a n...
-
thank you! very helpful
-
I'd love to hear your process for doing so to write up an FAQ for this if you have sped up tx's in the past using freewallet
-
I'm unclear how much of this is a FreeWallet question vs. just needing to understand CPFC, keeping in mind that Counterparty is odd in that it reuses addresses over and over (vs. typical wallets that send BTC to new addresses with every transaction).
My take is CFPC is bascially just a way of looking at a chain of transactions, not a technical feature of wallets. If you have a low fee on an early transaction (so miners ignore it, because they see plenty of higher-fee transactions), but then add a really high fee on a later transaction that is downstream/dependent on the early transaction(s) to clear first, miners see that it makes sense to mine the chain of transactions to get the combined fees, given the total fees are high enought to make the weight/size of all the transactions attractive in a given fee environment.
When I needed to push through a Counterparty transaction, I'd look at mempool.space, see what my fee rate was, see what the going rate was, and I'd try to ballpark how much additional fee was needed given what was being mined at the time. Then I'd create another Counterparty transaction (seems like it could be anything - creating an asset, locking, sending), and add the additional needed fee amount from the original transaction to whatever I would have gone with for the new transaction. I'm guessing you could also just send all your BTC to yourself and add fee that way (your entire BTC balance to keep UTXOs to a minimum), but I don't think I ever actually did this. When you look at the new transaction on mempool, you'll see an effective fee rate that takes into account both (or all) the transactions waiting to be mined in your chain of transactions.
More technical people might have thoughts on all the above, but that's my take. -
Would be nice to have a MAX send button. Where the gas fee is subtracted from total Send.
-
And adjusts if you tweak the fee! I’ve tried to send all my BTC from an address on FreeWallet, adjusted the fee, and then been left with just dust level BTC in an address.
-
I just load my priv key into electrum. Handles this well.
-
Yep, that seems to be the universal suggestion. If you scroll way up, I was just mentioning I never see just using FreeWallet as an alternative, was wondering if there was a downside.
-
Yes. This is why I've personally referred to Electrum for that feature. Extremely Useful.
-
But don't see why a button can't be applied in the Send Bitcoin Window.
-
Well I am trying to write an FAQ from the viewpoint of a user who may have just done their first XCP tx and ran into this issue of using too small of a fee. Which happens ALOT
-
And it may even be their first BTC tx - this is helpful though
-
and I think I can write an FAQ from the information you provided
- 29 July 2023 (10 messages)
-
looks like youre tx is at 4.8 sat/vB
-
blocks are averaging including 7-10 sat/vB ish atm
-
The Mempool Open Source Project®
Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with The Mempool Open Source Project®. See the real-time status of your transactions, get network info, and more.
-
its the fee holding it back atm
-
Just for clarification. Did you use the "high" fee setting in Freewallet or something else?
-
Joined. - 30 July 2023 (3 messages)
-
If you scroll up the previous member asked this questions and it seems CPFP is the process. Though I have not tackled an FAQ for this yet. Many users have used electrum to do this process.
In the future make sure to set the fee to HIGH or even higher if you are in a hurry to send your tx -
Joined. -
Joined. - 31 July 2023 (81 messages)
-
i have the following, urgent problem...
newest freewallet version
trying to process a multisend, but second signature fails always (don't know why), so tranaction gets canceled automatically.
afterwards the btc required for a new transaction can not be spent again, see failure screen.
just works when i send new btc to the wallet address - but still no multisend possible.
known problem / any solution? -
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
If youve done alot of Tx's on that address the total amount of btc you have is actually comprised of many UTXO's
-
basically you got to gather all the UTXO's up by sending the total amount of BTC to yourself - or sometimes I send it all to another address I own and back again
-
does it partial send? or no send at all?
-
basically can you see that it sent "some" of the assets on xchain?
-
or just failed to send entirely?
-
If its failing to send sometimes I change the fee and it works
-
How many assets in the multisend? Sometimes I find I cant do over 15-20 for some reason
-
but its not too consistent of an issue in my use cases personally
-
maybe just trying to fish out the problem as it could be a couple things
-
did you include subassets?
-
or all named?
-
This has worked for me on the recent version yes
-
ok good to know
-
I'm adding this to my list of FAQ's to add which include at the moment:
Updated/Reimported freewallet - can only see 20 addy's
Issue with multisend using Trezor
Speed up BTC tx? how? its too low?
^ CPFP
Issue with multisend not confirmed second Signing of TX -
interesting. Could be related, but could be easily tested by unadding the trezor addy and re adding it
-
Though I will say this is not the first time I've heard someone bring multi-send issues up with v0.9.23
-
specifically with the second signing of tx
-
let me know if this works
-
just for the record, did restarting freewallet or using the refresh option help at all? I know thats usually the first thing I do
-
I'm gonna add this to the issue section in freewallet for now and want to be pretty detailed
-
Multisend Issue with Not Signing Second TX - v0.9.23 · Issue #152 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Some users are experiencing an issue where a Multisend fails on the second Signing of Transaction in v0.9.23 These sends do not include subassets (if that matters) Some solutions I have seen that m...
-
I also added that I have heard less issues with 0.9.22 for multisend - and community feel free to comment if you have some more information of if this happens to you guys as well with 0.9.23
-
So if it is incredibly urgent it may be a route to try downgrading to 0.9.22 as well
-
there is one already
-
-
MAX fee looks like it was fixed here https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues/71deduct miners fee from "MAX" btc send · Issue #71 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
need to update wallet so that when user clicks "MAX" to send max amount of BTC out of their wallet we deduct the miners fee from that amount. Right now some users are clicking "MAX&q...
-
Joined. -
thank you, keep in touch
-
added an FAQ for CPFP (speeding up tx's with too low of a fee): https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#help-i-used-too-small-of-a-fee-and-my-transaction-is-not-confirmingFreewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
interesteing bug report: just recognised that if you place a usd-amount in the field, the auto-converted amount of btc is calculated wrong. maybe some processing hickup is caused through this as well?
-
-
hmm i just tested this and auto-convert is working fine on my end
-
-
-
-
-
awesome
-
weird that happened though, havent seen that
-
Yeah never had this pb as well
-
great summary. Trying to do that for a transaction stuck since 5 days, but electrum wants to just get my UTXO as an input and not add a new one to increase the fee 🤔.
I wonder if there is services to do a custom transaction building -
Restarting is usually the way to go
-
I used this as my reference (along with information from other users) https://academy.bit2me.com/en/que-es-child-pays-for-parent-cpfp/#:~:text=The%20term%20Child%20Pays%20For,has%20no%20priority%20for%20miners.&text=Bitcoin%20transactions%2C%20how%20do%20they%20work%3FWhat is Child Pays For Parent (CPFP)?
Child Pays For Parent, is a stuck transaction that allows us to push the confirmation of a transaction in the mempool of a cryptocurrency.
-
It does mention "In short, a CPFP is used by our UTXO balance to generate a new transaction with a higher mining fee in order to speed up the confirmation of the initial transaction."
-
I'm not too sure how the UTXO balance is applied here to be honest, feel free to correct anything if it seems wrong on the explanation
-
just tried sending a new transaction and electrum propose by default to include the unconfirmed output 🔥
-
Electrum works really well for that 👌
-
(sad that the UI is awful ^^')
-
what you mean its like playing Roller Coaster Tycoon
-
;)
-
ahah. Loved that game ^^
-
same
-
Hi frens!
-
If I close the dispenser and there are still 2 tx pending... they won't be delivered, right?
-
They will be delivered I think either you close or not
-
However if you close before their pending tx get confirmed, they might be rugged
-
In the assumption that your tx confirms before theirs
-
@davesta you confirm?
-
It's that they had very low fee rates... they were never going to be confirmed... but what I've done is close the dispenser... and then send them manually... so I can burn the supply without selling!
-
But thks fren!
-
Make sure that you receive the fundd before yeah
-
yes... I pushed it in electrum... maybe I could have done that from the beginning... but hey, everything's solved
-
wow! INTERESTING
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
I mention the User's responsibility here as well the fact that the community is still debating this feature
-
its good you are going to manually send them the tokens if they get confirmed
-
Some community members really love dispensers, some dont
FreeWallet Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 12 Jul 2023 (16)
- 13 Jul 2023 (18)
- 14 Jul 2023 (19)
- 15 Jul 2023 (10)
- 16 Jul 2023 (6)
- 17 Jul 2023 (65)
- 18 Jul 2023 (4)
- 19 Jul 2023 (2)
- 20 Jul 2023 (4)
- 21 Jul 2023 (5)
- 22 Jul 2023 (2)
- 23 Jul 2023 (36)
- 24 Jul 2023 (25)
- 25 Jul 2023 (23)
- 26 Jul 2023 (57)
- 27 Jul 2023 (4)
- 28 Jul 2023 (15)
- 29 Jul 2023 (10)
- 30 Jul 2023 (3)
- 31 Jul 2023 (81)