- 01 February 2024 (14 messages)
-
not even this article helps at the moment......especially for larger tx's.... might either rewrite it or just unpublish it -
which is very sad
-
if xcp is having a protocol issue with multi-send... I wouldn't know how to correctly explain the issue happening at the protocol level in detail as an issue in the xcp github
it would be very helpful to the community if a dev explained the issue in detail on behalf of the users -
FYI... I've hired Javier to look into the fee issue in freewallet and make updates so that it does a pre-flight check to get the ACTUAL size of the tx instead of just guessing... this should result in much more accurate fee estimates in freewallet/dogewallet... prolly 3-4 weeks away from a release with this feature..... cant put it off any longer... dont have time to write myself, but luckily Javier has a hole in his busy dev schedule, so he is going to take some time to write it 🙂 -
core issue is wallet right now bases fees off a hardcoded tx size.... not accurate at all.. this was fine when CP was small and almost everything was a simple send... now that we support much larger txs, and multi-sends, getting better fee estimation in the wallet is much more important.... it is a relatively simple fix to do... just time-consuming to update the wallet... I'm focused elsewhere right now (BTNS and XChain Platform)... but Javier is going to focus on fee updates in Freewallet so that it works better with less hung txs.
-
freewallet-desktop/html/fields/tx-fee.html at master · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Desktop wallet for Win/Mac/Linux which supports Bitcoin and Counterparty - jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
-
there is the current wallet fee estimation code... ugly ugly since 2018.. will be updated in the coming weeks 🙂
-
getting this error on a multi send -
Error validating transaction: Error running script for input 0 referencing 6f13dfeb033cf293980e2a75190781891a192705712956428b24a0afdb3cd238 at 0: scriptsig not push only for P2SH.
-
that is an issue with counterparty, not xchain or freewallet.. so best to take it up with the counterparty core devs
-
yes sir
-
on it
-
-
i heard we need to rollback to do a sweep? Where can i find the version that allows sweeps and do we just download it and it will rollback? thx - 02 February 2024 (7 messages)
-
download the latest version of freewallet, and all features work fine... sweep was fixed quite a while ago.
-
to clarify... all Freewallet does is talk to api.counterparty.io (CP API) and sign/broadcast the transaction the CP API hands back... so, this is not an issue with Freewallet... its an issue with the TX being generated by CP API.
-
thankyou
-
sweep doesnt transfer btc and xcp, just everything else right?
-
sweep transfers everything but btc (all XCP Balances) and/or all asset ownership... in a single tx
-
whats the best way to go back to the old wallet version? -
install a previous version - 03 February 2024 (21 messages)
-
https://github. com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/releases -
Just heard some complaints that the Exchange tab was no longer showing a list of exchange markets as expected... I looked into this, and found the issue on XChain.io API... as expected, related to the filtering of numerics... it seems to have broken a couple API endpoints... which have now been fixed.... TLDR.. freewallet Exchange tab should be working normally again.
-
-
Cheers! -
Is it possible to enable RBF for freewallet transactions? -
That would be really helpful for being able to fix stuck TXs without having to rely on CPFP
-
-
gotta enable it in Counterparty first
-
JP is able to create RBF counterparty transactions
-
with electrum
-
I asked about it a week or two ago
-
-
cool... maybe have him submit a pull request to freewallet.... My focus is on BTNS and building tools for it... not on Counterparty... Im happy to keep running the tools and keep making incremental improvements... but my focus is not on CP anymore... so, adding a bunch of additional features to FreeWallet is not on my todo list... paying Javier to work on better fee estimation, then prettymuch done with updates to Freewallet for a while (will do one more release to change default hosts from xchain.io to tokenscan.io once xchain.io purchase is made public)
-
TLDR... if ya want something added to freewallet, like RBF, maybe get some other devs to submit pull requests... I'm just one dev, and my focus is elsewhere.
-
Holy shit
-
What I am building for XChain Platform, CP / DP will be able to take advantage of (explorers, wallets tools)... but, my focus is on building new tools with new functionality for BTNS / XChain platform... FreeWallet will stay up and operating, as it has, for years to come... but, my dev focus is no longer on CP, but on BTNS and building the XChain Platform.
-
xchain purchase?
-
-
-
-
- 05 February 2024 (30 messages)
-
@jdogresorg check DMs please sir 🐸 -
anyone else having issues updating descriptions via fw? seems to not work -
"seems not to work"...not very technical analysis of what is breaking n why... lol
-
-
-
-
seems to be working fine here... just gotta pay a decent tx fee n poof... magic
-
could also be... counterparty API servers failing randomly... when I was running the API servers, would notice that even tho both servers were technically "up"... one server would return responses and the other would just kinda hang or return empy/null responses occasionally.... a restart of the counterparty service usally got things working again.... but, I dont run the API servers anymore, and have no access to them... AFAIK no issues with freewallet... all freewallet does is talk to CP API and sign txs locally... so, if your having issues with generating txs.... check your local network, make sure your not blocked... make sure your API requests are going through fine, etc.
-
its weird I put the link into fw but in the tx it doesnt show up - https://xchain.io/tx/78997caf8d16d17e5a95a945a4369ae1405932f2b15e2edf3ff7b8ca33c231db
-
hrm... make sure your on the latest version
-
-
getting an error now anyways
-
error is prolly related to your address or BTC balances or something... not aware of any issues in freewallet with changing asset descriptions
-
ok will keep trying thanks
-
was my fault I am tarded was using long link and not the short easy asset one
-
sorry guys
-
Bitcoin Transaction: f47998a95c92c6dfe2b907cf13455dd738710ba878f4a67eb841f4759bfd9d20
Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with mempool.space
-
-
so much for txs automatically expiring from the mempool after 2 weeks..... this is a tx I sent over 2 months ago... it disappeared from being visisble for a while with the higher fees n busy network... now that fees have dropped again... the tx is back to being passed around the mempool..
-
bitcoin is wierd... your txs can live for a very long time... unless you double-spend (spend the inputs) and eject the old tx from the mempool
-
I have had some extremely wonky tx problems recently
3k hung up... dispensers randomly triggering... tx's invisible some places but not others
Problems I have NEVER had before.
But the last question I asked in CP chat my answers ranged from "submit a Github ticket" to "go touch grass and let big brains amaze you... cause its groundhog day"
So I'll just find work arounds that are low/no tech -
knowing from working through with Kane yesterday:
- he had an unconfirmed broadcast tx (BTNS tx which looked FINE for sat/vb... it was just unconfirmed)
- during that time he put through a large BTC send (lots of inputs) and Freewallet did not accurately estimate the fee, so it sat unconfirmed and low sat/vb
- then, somehow, mempool dot space saw the second tx as a CPFP and linked those two together (why? and how? inputs being the same or something?) so both sat unconfirmed for HOURS
- on Electrum one of the unconfirmed tx's showed and we tried to push it through with a CPFP on the transaction....
- this electrum CPFP tx (I HAVE NO IDEA WHY) then triggered a dispenser (from the large BTC send?) on a SEPARATE address in his wallet..... with absolutely insanely low sat/vb fee
its the most confused I ever been reading blockchain data in my life -
wouldnt even begin to know where and what to write in a FW github or a CP github post
-
Yeah... thats what I said... wonky
-
sounds like a bunch of txs and assumptions... so yeah, tough to accurately track down exactly what happened (nor doubt anyone has the time/desire to do so)... however, there have never been any instances of dispensers being triggered by "change" outputs... so, the whole a send from an address triggering a dispense on the same address sounds pretty wonky
-
I would take things one at a time... try to reproduce ONE issue, then create a github issue for it... AFAIK, no known issues in CP with dispensers or in Freewallet other than bad fee estimation.. which has been for many years... and which I am working on right now
-
As soon as I posted this here, a J-Dog sprung up on chat, wants me to.. lol
-
scammers gonna scam
-
- 06 February 2024 (9 messages)
-
Hi Ram I am pretty confused about what you are asking
1. You placed a successful order on a dispenser?
- the transaction you posted shows a tx with a very small sat/vb rate so it is not showing on xchain because the btc nodes that xchain pulls information from have not seen that transaction yet (since the fee is so small it may never show)
- so it looks like this order you posted is NOT successful
- to bump the fee for the transaction you have a couple options, one of which is called Child Pays For Parent..... but it is most recommended to use Electrum to do so if doing that process
2. You cannot replenish a half empty dispenser. you will either have to close it and reopen it, or wait till the final buys are made and it closes itself (due to it being empty)
- as for 'issue supply' at the same address.... this terminology is usually used when you issue more of token that is not locked.... I would guess you are looking to just "put more assets for sale that you own" in which you simply would have to have those assets on the same dispenser address and when that dispenser is closed, you simply make a new dispenser -
this article can help you understand why the fee was so low (you had 3 inputs on your address) and how to do CPFP with Electrum
-
One correction… you can refill dispensers up to 5 times without closing it…. From either the dispenser address or origin address….
Just act like ur opening the dispenser again at the same price n enter how much more u want escrowed into the dispenser. -
i had no idea you could do this
-
interesting
-
interesting so if the price is the same it just "adds" to the previous dispenser tx?
-
or is it a separate dispenser tx?
-
correct... just throws the new tokens into escrow... give amount and mainchain rate stay same... escrowed amount is all that changes 🙂
-
- 07 February 2024 (7 messages)
-
ugh... sec i'll check.. looks like API issue
-
should be working again
-
-
Pooh Shiesty - Back In Blood (feat. Lil Durk) [Official Music Video]
Pooh Shiesty - Back In Blood (feat. Lil Durk) Stream: https://apple.co/38qWEju Shot by @JerryPHD Subscribe for more official content from POOH SHIESTY: https://poohshiesty.lnk.to/Youtube FOLLOW POOH SHIESTY Instagram: https://poohshiesty.lnk.to/Instagram Twitter: https://poohshiesty.lnk.to/Twitter Facebook: https://poohshiesty.lnk.to/Facebook LISTEN TO POOH SHIESTY Apple: https://poohshiesty.lnk.to/AppleMusic Spotify: https://poohshiesty.lnk.to/Spotify Soundcloud: https://poohshiesty.lnk.to/Soundcloud Audiomack: https://poohshiesty.lnk.to/Audiomack The official YouTube channel of 1017 Records artist POOH SHIESTY. Subscribe for the latest music videos, performances, and more. #BackInBlood #PoohShiesty #LilDurk #TheNew1017
-
trying to lock a token from freewallet/trezor and keep getting this error? sent coins no problem so there is sufficient ₿ at the addy
- 08 February 2024 (62 messages)
-
Yo fake JDog in here @davesta @jdogresorg
-
how many inputs are on the btc addy?
-
i would kick him and ban him but he already left
-
3 I think
-
but it sent xcp token fine
-
weird it would not work to lock
-
each function is entirely different and having 3 inputs will raise the tx fees considerably
-
ahh ok gotcha
-
so try a higher fee
-
or consolidate the btc then try
-
tx broooskkkeeeee
-
no worries gmuns that error is in the FAQ as well as in the user manual so there a couple other things you can try if that doesn't work
-
is the 12 words seed used in Freewallet can be used in Trust wallet to access the same addresses? -
My Freewallet balances are not updating with new received tokens.
Anyone experiencing the same / have a fix? -
I'm having this error when I try to send BTC out.
In the box i set the usd value but the btc value is way higher then the balance
if i try to type into the btc box its the same issue, way too low usd
Sorry no permissions to send screenshot here
Any ideas? -
nope... different derivation path and wordlist for counterwallet passphrases (its not BIP39).... so nope, 12 word counterwallet seed is not potable to other addresses... tho you can always dump private keys and import those individually 🙂
-
are you verifying that your not being blocked or rate-limited? I am receiving tokens fine and they are showing up in my balances fine.... rather than assuming it is a problem with the wallet... maybe check your connection, check the debug log to see if you see any red error lines indicating failed API requests, etc..... nothing in freewallet ha changed recently... so, only reason I can think of for there to be "balance" issues is your requests to get balances are not being updated
-
if you have TECHNICAL details like your address and an API endpoint where a token SHOULD show up in your balances but is NOT, then I'd be happy to look into it... once I have technical details to track down and verify... but just "balances not working" is not enough for me to find any issue... works fine here
-
-
^^ XCPMAG token received 2 days ago
-
-
^^ XCPMAG token showing up in balances fine
-
If extracted private key and used another wallet it would probably mess with all the tokens in that address ?
-
sounds like a local issue with your wallet not calculating prices correctly... just checked here and it seemd to work fine.. I put in 0.01 BTC and it comes up as like $400...
-
-
^^ putting in 0.01 BTC... price shows 450 usd
-
-
^^ putting in 1000 USD... BTC shows 0.022 BTC.... so, from what I am seeing, things are working correctly
-
if your not seeing that, please figure out exactly how to reproduce the issue and create a github issue for it at github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issuesIssues · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Desktop wallet for Win/Mac/Linux which supports Bitcoin and Counterparty - Issues · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
-
Ok, then it's worth only my side. Thanks
-
you should always exercise caution when putting your 12-word passphrase or private keys into a wallet... make sure you trust that wallet (verify it is open source)... cuz yeah, anytime you put in your seed or private keys, you at risk of someone being able to use those addresses in your wallet.... if you dont verify taht the wallet is open source, non-custodial, etc.
-
make sure your on the latest version of freewallet.... also, will be putting out a release later today or tomorrow with updated fee estimation.
-
I woud put in the exact BTC amount you want to send, and dont worry about the USD calculation (which seems to be off on your system).... the BTC amount is what is actually used in the BTC tx... so, if you make sure any number is good, make sure the BTC amount field is correct amount 🙂
-
you should be able to send screenshots now... I tweaked your permissions... the pimpslapperbot limited your permissions cuz your relatively new to the channel 🙂
-
-
-
I will wait for the new version
-
yeah... def looks like the fee calculation is off there... a bad BTC price would do taht... tho not able to reproduce here
-
will this ever come through lol... -
hash:
25b8ee35d41608291b3b7de9ae928356bf3dc5f29ac5048f98008aa66405555f -
cpfp didn't work
-
no one can answer if this wil confirm or not.... gotta just wait for the network to mine it
-
2 f months
-
CPFP wont work on this tx... since the only output is NOT a change address.... so, no way to do another tx and chain this tx
-
yep i guess i just can wait for fees to drop below 15
-
🙏
-
yeah... it will maybe happen eventually... I just had a tx I broadcast 2 months ago at 21.6 sats confirm after 2+ months of waiting...
-
Bitcoin Transaction: f47998a95c92c6dfe2b907cf13455dd738710ba878f4a67eb841f4759bfd9d20
Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with mempool.space
-
so yep... waiting is prolly your best bet
-
Thanks for giving your attention JDog.
I have a bunch of Connection Timed Out failures in the Debug
My wallet is also not synched, stuck on Block 828,443
Additional context, I have been trying different API Hosts, currently set to host2.xchain.io -
-
-
yeah... your pointing to host1.xchain.io.... i've said for a long time to not do that cuz pointing to individual hosts bypasses the load balancer, and the servers can disappear
-
that is what happened here... host1.xchain.io got shut down (replaced by faster servers)... so.... update host1.xchain.io back to default xchain.io and all should work again 🙂
-
-
match those settings n u should be good 🙂
-
-
-
is there a way to see my UTXO's in Freewallet? If not, can the private key or seed phrase be exported to any other wallet to view UTXO's? -
you can view UTXO's on address at https://blockstream.info/ and they will show as "CONFIRMED UNSPENT" outputs
as for a wallet to view them the most commonly used by the community is Electrum (https://electrum.org/)
I wrote an in depth article about this linked here:
https://medium.com/@davesta.xcp/understanding-btc-fees-and-utxos-when-using-counterparty-ae22f40b642aBlockstream Block ExplorerBlockstream Explorer is an open source block explorer providing detailed blockchain data across Bitcoin, Testnet, and Liquid. Supports Tor and tracking-free.
-
I would recommend just importing the address specific private key and not your seed phrase for just one extra layer of safety
-
Thanks!
- 09 February 2024 (40 messages)
-
If you import 2 private keys (from freewalet) to electrum... it usually allows you to do CPFP, balance goes to second addy.
-
FreeWallet (@FreeWallet) on X
Happy to announce the release of version 0.9.27 of FreeWallet Desktop wallet for Windows, Macintosh, and Linux. This update includes more accurate transaction fee estimation! #Bitcoin #Counterparty $XCP #Freewallet https://t.co/s4jRuSiTfk
-
i did see the calculating fee setting work intermittently in my experience and the sat/vb rates in some cases were correct, but for this test with minting a subasset with a description (5 outputs total) it was not a high enough rate... specifically it looks like mempool dot space is showing the 'effective fee rate' as too low
Ill let the tx's simmer for a little but I wrote up the issue with tx's n stuffs here
https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues/186subasset minting + description using high fee v0.9.27 · Issue #186 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktoptested minting a subasset with a description (easyasset): https://zdxtxmklf4usl3suag6oflslt4qatx6vzf3gpg33aujlb7lifsba.arweave.net/yO87sUsvKSXuVAG84q5LnyAJ39XJdmebewUSsP1oLII/PEPEA.json high fee se...
-
hrm... i'll dig into it in the AM... just did a send and it does seem to be a lil bit low on fee estimation.
-
after thinking about it after too I did see the second tx 'replaced' the first - maybe the nodes thought it was a child tx ... and the second tx tried to pick up the slack of the earlier tx? - maybe wrong interpretation.... just a thought on a possible reason
-
I just did a single tx with 1 input, 1 op_return, and 1 change output... should have a fee rate of 21 sats, came out with fee rate of 15 sats..
-
HAH... turns out I was basing the fee calculations on the size of the UNSIGNED tx... not the signed tx, which would obviously be a bit larger... late night... fixed... putting together new builds.. will just drop them in place over the top of the other 0.9.27 builds... gimme 30 mins 🙂
-
Release v0.9.27 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Better transaction fee estimation support
-
should be fixed now... more accurate fee estimation... still need to do some additional testing of MPMA sends and verify that fees there are working correctly... so, prolly add some more to the suggested "high" fee for MPMA as usual.
-
-
tested some more tx's today and still having trouble with high fee setting - tried a few functions:
- subasset mint with longform easyasset description
- sending BTC to new address
- send a single XCP asset to new address
https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues/187
don't know if its because this address has those unconfirmed tx's from yesterday or what the issue is now.... though these new tx's don't even seem to show on mempool dot space or blockstream.... only one showed up on xchain from those three
again, I'll let those tx's simmer and see what happens and maybe later do some testing from a simpler address (no unconfirmed muddied up tx's)testing fee functions on 0.9.27 (second binary) · Issue #187 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktophere are some tx tests with the new binary from 0.9.27 first I tried to do a Subasset mint with an easyasset longform description (same details as in previous issue #186 but have 2 tx's stuck f...
-
Thx…. Javier is looking at the fee estimation code to see if he can fine tune things a bit more…. Once that’s done… I’ll put out a new release, etc..
Busy busy 👍🏻 -
update - looks like the BTC send and single XCP asset send went through fine - was just super confusing to see nodes not see it for like 30 min from the other block explorers
but subasset mint not visible still
and unconfirmed tx's from yesterday were replaced/dropped -
hey, Ive updated freewallet to 0.9.27 and now it does pop up the window with the TRANSACTION LINK
only shows this: -
I used to modify the fee manually to overpay just in case...
I added 8000 sats, but the notification shows 5376 sats before confirming (?)
The tx in the mempool spent 8000sats though -
0.9.26 felt more stable for me... I think.
I was happy to add my own fees manually and get the link for the TX right away :) -
from my understanding the 5376 sats is a fee on top of the 8000 base sats - so from the UI its saying it should be 13376 sats total
-
It is saying that it will send BTC with the assets.
The final TX was 8000 sats fee total as I put it... but the popup now shows a wrong fee. In the previous version indicated the fee I put it manually -
you send the tx through? howd it look?
-
ah always thought it was the latter.... but yes I agree, lots of confusing UI for a user
-
tx was ok. Normal.
OPRETURN + 8000 sats -
I think it is a bug with 0.9.27
on 0.9.26 was OK for me. -
I updated the wallet this afternoon
-
as a user i always interpreted "additional fee" as an additional fee, not an output coming back in a UTXO
-
With MULTISEND doesnt work that way.
Because you are sending X assets.... the wallet ADDS some BTC as fee.
But if you mean when you were MINTING, yes, it adds 3 "sends" of 1000 sats on top of TX -
imagine i was a stupid user who didnt understand that
-
not being facetious
-
i get what you explained - but would a ELI5 user get that?
-
-
but those additional 3000 sats go back to your wallet, not to miners.
I guess it's because more info is need on the signatures... or something -
not sure either, but I check all my txs... and it is what I learn from experience
-
and yeah... this shit isnt easy to understand. It isnt intuitive either LOL
-
I got many TX stuck in the past... so I had to learn how to calculate my fees manually before broadcasting them 😝
-
can confirm same thing happened in my UI testing a multisend
-
though generated tx seemed fine - upped the fee a bit - looks like it will confirm fine
-
yeah, confirmation is ok. It is just the UX bug / notification
-
OK thanks… I’ll get that fixed in the next release in the next day or so…. I believe that issue is only happening for MPMA sends
-
threw it in an issue for the recordz
https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues/188UI for Multi-Send not showing Transaction Link · Issue #188 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop0.9.27 user broadcasts a Multi-send and usually the UI (for all other functions) shows a "Check Transaction on...." popup but new version only shows: does not show link to tx
-
-
Thank u
- 10 February 2024 (4 messages)
-
Gm -
Can anyone help with error composing tx via api
-
Btc balance unconfirmed
-
So I fixed it don't worry
- 13 February 2024 (16 messages)
-
damn... freewallet 0.9.27 super buggy.
I sent an asset (only one), fee suggested was 3800sats. I changed it manually to 5000 sats and when I broadcast tx.... the freewallet used 2000 sats 🤬 -
Im gonna downgrade to 0.9.26.
it was more stable -
😱
-
it might be automatically using your low fee limit in your settings
-
You need increase much more
-
My problem is that I used 5000 sats when high priority was <3000 and freewallet changed it.
that did not happen with 0.9.26 -
stable is relative.... all tx costs were based on average tx size... not actual tx size.... and "super buggy"... interesting term... seems like your issue is with fee estimation, which you can manually edit yourself if your unhappy with the fees.... 0.9.27 calculates the fee based on the ACTUAL size of the tx, not an estimate... but if you want to downgrade, go for it...
-
I use electrum after if I get fees wrong. Depends how busy memepool is also to keep in mind
-
Porkchop taught me lol
-
Jdog, what I mean is that before I could select manually the fee.
Now changes it at random even when I change it manually.
If I need to mint, the weight is 1300vB, I prefer to calculate the fee manually and add some sats -
would be nice to have RBF enabled in CP txs by default
-
hrm.... so.. if you put "custom fee"... and then change something... the "custom fee" is blown away when the new fee calculation is done? if yes, then that is indeed an issue.....
-
Yes, that's the issue. I always check mempool fees, calculate it and use the custom fee... but new version messes my tx :S
-
think I should update the UI to show the sats fee and tx size... so ppl can manually calculate the fee on their own if they want.... to verify tx fee is calculated correctly.... show the fee rate as well as the actual fee
-
hrm... I just tried and I am not seeing that behavior... I have custom fee set at 1000 sats... I change some stuff... see the tx fee being calculated... but dont see the "custom" fee change from 1000 sats
-
Video by Gyazo
Gyazo is the easiest way to record screenshots & videos you can share instantly. Save time with async visual communication that's effortless and engaging.
- 15 February 2024 (60 messages)
-
-
-
Added some additional updates to freewallet to show you calculated tx size and sats/vB... should make verifying fees a bit easier
-
had hoped to push the wallet release out today... but got valentines day stuff to do tonight... so will push out the new release tomorrow 🙂
-
-
also just added code so that when you manually edit the tx fee... it calculates the sat/vb for you... so, can easily play around with adjusting fee manually to get it close to the target sat/vB your looking for 🙂
-
Thanks JDog, amazing!
-
-
Davesta
-
" H I" gets deleted lol
-
Bot does not like it
-
Wanted to tell you that tx finally went through
-
Release v0.9.28 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Improved transaction fee interface Improved MPMA send transaction fee support Adjusted default tx size to 256 bytes
-
Yeah I saw thanks a mill
-
what's the difference between "Effective Fee Rate" and sat/vb fee rate
-
tested a subasset minting + longform description - and the fee rate was 38 sat/vb (correct and same as new UI showed me) but mempool.space said the tx had an 'Effective Fee Rate' of 15.8
-
it was held in the mempool until a block under 15 sat/vb was confirmed and not a previous few that were 18 sat/vb +
.... also why do some tx's have an effective fee rate and some do not? -
effective fee is the fee on the tx AFTER you take into account all the pending utxos and their fees
-
pending utxos on the address? or in the mempool?
-
or in the tx itself?
-
your tx included utxos which were not confirmed in a block yet (pending txs).
-
how would i know if my tx included utxo's if the previous pending tx's dont show on a btc node (or a block explorer)
-
in a perfect world, you would always send stuff with a high tx fee to get it confirmed
-
in a non perfect world are all those tx's with too low of a fee sitting somewhere that effect future tx's?
-
yes... all txs are made up of inputs and outputs
-
like for example if I have 10 unconfirmed tx's with like 1 sat/vb and they dont show on a block explorer
-
this is why you should gather your utxos from time to time.... ensures your txs stay small as possible (single input) and ensures that your not using PENDING utxos
-
ah - okay let me consolidate and try again
-
good to know
-
just cuz dont show on block explorer doesn't mean anything other than your tx is below that explorers display threshold
-
mmmmm i never thought about using consolidating UTXO's as a way to clean up low unconfirmed tx's that are in limbo (and basically unseen by block explorers)
-
makes sense tho
-
exception to that rule is MPMA sends.. which currently dont have a change output in the second tx, so no way to speed it up by doing CPFP or RBF
-
so in theory if I did it again it shouldnt have an effective fee rate at all, because the effective fee rate will be the sat/vb on a 'clean' address with no pending utxos?
-
but this new release should have much more accurate fee estimation on both the first and second txs thanks to @pataegrillo and his work the last couple days 🙂
-
oh i am blown away by the UI and the fee estimation - just testing it all atm
-
hmm - just consolidated my addy with this tx (which had two outputs on my address, despite sending max amount.... ???) :
https://blockstream.info/tx/07acba9c95af4c51bb1d8707fce89de01d07f3f23db84fead8713d859e0973e3
but the new subasset issuance tx (after consolidation) still shows an effective fee rate:
https://mempool.space/tx/505cc161a85a95d0262130bac36500a5ae1c7b2c26c7e016d25dace38fe9b361 -
in the event my consolidating of my UTXO's broke the address into 2 inputs..... does that account for a 1/2 effective fee rate?
-
your "consolidating" only "consolidates" the txs that are seen by your node
-
.... i wish i knew that
-
this is so confusing - so I cannot consolidate UTXO's which are there but no node can see them?
-
electrum should see your low fee txs.. but maybe not... bitcoin core almost always does 😛
-
ah yes, run a node, read a book...
-
I dont know how you "consolidated"... did you just use freewallet? if so, your relying on the nodes at api.counterparty.io and what txs/utxos they see
-
i simply consolidated with freewallet
-
as a test
-
I dont mean to sound disrespectful or condesending sir.
-
neither do i
-
got ya... yeah, to consolidate, electrum or bitcoin core are prolly best
-
im just imagining many users will have no idea many 'hidden UTXO's' they have from previous low fee tx attempts
-
if not most of them
-
either way fee's look great, good proper estimations
-
just not from a person who threw down like 20 low fee txs i cant see anymore on my main minting addy
-
absolutely, fees are always hard... will build a "consolidate utxos" feature into freewallet in future.. prolly pull direct from some electrum or bitcoin core, get a more accurate list of utxos... til then, use electrum to consolidate pls 🙂
-
could always btcnitro.com it... not ideal, but would confirm it 😛
-
just trying to wrap my head around re-explaining this ^
-
that article was already 10x TLDR
-
thanks for the update and clarification - all makes sense
-
just super 'hidden' info that's hard to take into account in my specific situation
-
this statement was simply a frustration that it may be time I run a node....
- 16 February 2024 (39 messages)
-
so did this new update allow RBF for all other functions other than MPMA?
-
or was that always possible?
-
cause i just successfully RBF'd the stuck Subasset Minting tx while consolidating my UTXO's with electrum
-
-
hmm interesting - so Electrum doesnt inherently support RBF on a subasset minting tx.... but consolidating the btc while its unconfirmed does.... little confused
-
i consolidated with Electrum, then did a MPMA, then tried again, but still effective fee rate thing..... maybe electrum isnt seeing the UTXO's that a BTC node would....
-
i will say though thank you Jdog and Javier, the fee rate and calculations are so effing helpful omg
-
im guessing either my MPMA send made some UTXO's on my address that werent shown on a block explorer.... so I believed I was just using 1 input? or that Electrum didnt entirely consolidate all my old unconfirmed TX fee's cause it doesnt see em?
-
just tried a 136 char description on a BTNS broadcast and had the same effective fee rate issue..... maybe my address is just too dirty to clean with Electrum UTXO consolidations..... :( - gonna take a break for now .....
all functions seem to work fine and are calculated fine 'in a perfect world'
im just having issues with longform data on this address specifically..... MPMA was fine, Sending BTC was fine..... just adding alot of characters somewhere (IPFS in description of new asset, and longform description in a broadcast)
this update is going to help users so effing much on 99% of tx's ..... but my addy just too dirty -
ill test another address tomorrow
-
i lied, i tested it today. couldnt take a break unless I tried
consolidated my btc with electrum on a new address into 1 output... then tested minting an asset with a longform IPFS address with the recommended high fee
https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues/190
idk if its my fault - but I put the process into an issue anyway.... let me know if I messed up somewhereEffective Fee Rate with Longform Asset Description and Longform Broadcasts · Issue #190 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktopv0.9.28 I had previously done some testing with my main minting address for minting a subasset with an IPFS description at the time of minting I had an issue each time with the sat/vb being the cor...
-
will add option in future to disable "use unconfirmed utxos"... which is enabled by default in freewallet... then you will be able to only use CONFIRMED utxos in your txs... and avoid any of this "why is my effective fee different from my tx fee" confusion.... it all links back to using unconfirmed utxos
-
gotchya glad i could help with testing
-
everything else was snippy snappy perfect tho
-
sad to see my walls of text when this update did help SO MUCH
-
this update only happened cuz of your walls of text and faqs and support and helping me sus out what the community really needed... so thank YOU for all your hard work sir... I see u fam
-
-
-
-
The fee stimation for assets creations/minting still misleading
A normal token creation weights 1.3KvB.... not 533vB -
eg, my last fake
https://xchain.io/tx/a224d63339c56083ef74711911e93dd5a387562b23773015facbbf36a080203c
https://mempool.space/tx/a224d63339c56083ef74711911e93dd5a387562b23773015facbbf36a080203c
⚠️ REAL ADJUSTED vSIZE size 1.22 KvB ⚠️
It is what ive seen in all my token mints -
another example: https://mempool.space/tx/38901d1b2fc578d951bdfdb15d61784825ccd5fff96c73fe2f12d67f194c0e29Bitcoin Transaction: 38901d1b2fc578d951bdfdb15d61784825ccd5fff96c73fe2f12d67f194c0e29
Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with mempool.space
-
Hey guys, any idea why freewallet is not updating -
Last update 25 days ago, cannot figure out how to
-
Hi
I have set up a sell order for XCHAINPEPE/BTC on the exchange but the buyer couldn't buy the asset. My question is, how do I get the asset back in my wallet? -
Cancel the order or wait for it to expire
-
I've changed the server but now it shows no balance at all for btc...
-
-
Be aware
-
How do I cancel the order?
-
I had someone in my dms too
-
-
Be careful guys… I will never DM you first.. if someone’s asking you if you need help in your DM’s, it’s not me!
-
Now All the btc balances disappeared, from every address
-
maybe dont mess with the server settings unless you know what your doing? 🤷️️️️
-
-
I know, thanks jdog
-
Not too worry
-
All solved
- 17 February 2024 (14 messages)
-
Hi guys
-
Lol i cant text -
Now i can
-
Quick question is there a video I can share on how to buy an asset using btc dispenser on free wallet
It's for a new in boarder -
Robotlovecoffee.io
-
Yo. I have a question yall may be able to help with. Sent a payment Tx for some merchandise this morning using FreeWallet. Typically the Tx records will point to Blockstream Explorer when you hit "more info" to track confirmations, etc. Today it pointed to Block Cypher (?). It appears to be tracking as any other site would. However, the Tx ID it gives me doesn't pull anything when put into Blockstream Explorer or Mempool Space. Thought that was weird. Anyone else have this happen? It's only been about 30 minutes, so it may work itself out. -
it most likely means that the BTC you sent had multiple inputs it had to pull from....
and if you are using an older version of FW the fees were not calculated correctly so that tx is most likely had too small of a fee for even the block explorers to show the info.
I would first off update FW to the latest version (with more accurate fee estimations)
but as for this TX you would want to review and possibly push the tx through using a more technical and advanced BTC wallet called: Electrum -
i explain the inputs and electrum process in detail in this article
-
gM, Probably a dumb question but : I have two broadcasts in the mempool for a while now. Will it create a delay for the next one (even if high fees) or is it totally unrelated ? -
🤔
-
what do you mean by "next one"? the next broadcast you do after these 2 are in the mempool or the "second broadcast tx" you did that is also in the mempool?
-
i would assume if they are near the same fee they will be confirmed in the same block
-
but if it related to BTNS.... i think there are a few rules that the BTNS ruleset uses - that if they have the same timestamp they are invalid? might have to ask in the BTNS chat if so....
-
They are BTNS related from a few weeks ago. I forgot about it. If I make a new broadcast with high fees, will it pass before those two or will it be delayed ? I could just try and see but I ask the scientists for an educated answer 😉
- 18 February 2024 (1 messages)
-
i have pushed tx's through by simply sending all the bitcoin on the address to myself using Electrum to do so (send it to the same addy it is on) and up the fee about 3x what it tells you ..... in my experience it would 'replace by fee' the process and either push them through or use the unconfirmed coins from the previous tx .... and would definitely do that process before trying again
also definitely upgrade to the recent release of Freewallet which is 0.9.28 before trying again - 19 February 2024 (17 messages)
-
@al_fernandz I was able to add my freewallet to pepe.wtf but get "invalid signature" when trying to connect Unisat. And the xverse button doesn't seem to work at all. If it's user error, please let me know! Thank you -
DMing -
need to do couple of fixes there
-
Guys I am having some issues with Dogewallet multisend. Could anyone help me figuring out what is happening? Nothing gets sent and I am charged the fee
-
this is freewallet chat sir, i am not well versed with testing the new update for dogeparty, though jdog might have a response for it.... may be best for dogeparty chatz tho
-
Jdog told me to come here :)
-
That is why I am asking here
-
Now I have a Davesta sock in my Dms lol
-
god damnit
-
ah
-
got a tg handle for it? ill throw the banhammer
-
He said it is a fork of freewallet and I should ask here
-
As he is busy building
-
-
hmm well Multisend issues usually have to do with either
- too many btc outputs (in which you would consolidate your btc... in this case it would be your doge)
- issue with inputing the wrong multi-send tokens (you don't have them to send) or addresses (some addresses arent supported)
- not a high enough fee used for all tx outputs associated with the send
... but since Doge is so cheap.... these dont necessarily apply to dogewallet.... how much doge you put in for the fee? -
just a reminder to everyone who reads, I literally never DM for any wallet help stuff.... in fact if you DM me I get pissed and tell you to write in this chat
-
i know a FEW can vouch for that
- 20 February 2024 (14 messages)
-
I put 2 doge for the multisend
-
did it give you an error?
-
knowing doge this should be way more than enough
-
we've seen an issue that seems protocol related but it usually gives a specific error if so
-
No was just stuck and not moving forward
-
did it say "generating second tx" and be stuck there?
-
-
gotchya
-
Stuck here
-
this seemed to be an issue in older FW versions but is seen less now...
-
sorry i cannot help more.... some people report using less lines in the multisend helped.... ive heard people just splitting up the tx's into about 15 lines each
-
or until FW signs the second tx.... also a restart of your computer might help too... or turning VPN off and on
-
report back if any of that helped or didnt
-
Sent you something
- 21 February 2024 (26 messages)
-
Hey guys
-
I get an "error communicating with the counterparty..." When trying to send
-
As well as this
-
-
Any idea?
-
I get the same error trying to lock an asset. -
It must be the server. I get the same doing a multisend
-
What server are u using? Xchain.io?
-
gm, can i set up a dispenser if i have already one open?
ex: i have last token available in dispenser with source x(address), can i set up another disp with same source address? or i need to change address? -
if you use the same address and someone buys from that dispenser they could get all assets at once
-
Well, it fixed itself
-
so i need to change source address for each dispenser that i’ll open?
-
yeah pretty much
-
server caught up again:)
-
fyi... that errror is coming direct from the counterparty API servers... not freewallet or xchain... all freewallet is doing is reporting the error that the CP API is giving it... TLDR, not a freewallet-specific issue, a counterparty-API specific issue (prolly related to addrindexrs, which i believe core devs are removing)
-
Thanks for the clarification jdog🙏🏼
-
-
now off to yoga... then back on BTNS AIRDROP functionality 😉
-
I had some issues with mine out of 5 broadcasts only 2 went through 😢
-
What was the issue? Transaction still pending? Or transactions confirmed, but invalid on counterparty due to timestamp not increasing?
-
invalid: feed timestamps not monotonically increasing
-
I got these errors after it went through the memepool
-
yeah... join the BTNS channel... all this has been discusssed at lenght many times... your broadcasting too often...
-
Official BTNS Chat (EN)
This channel is for discussing the Broadcast Token Name System (BTNS) and the platform's features. Site: btns.wtf Wallet: t.me/freewallet_io Explorer: btns.xchain.io Twitter: x.com/BTNS420 English : https://t.me/BTNS420 Chinese : https://t.me/BTNS420CN
-
Doggfather (@DoggfatherCrew) on X
BTNS town hall meeting with the lead dev @jdogresorg Giving an update about the latest developments on the protocol level, the changes concerning the $SAT token, and the ongoing $GAS mint Set a reminder and add it to your calendar 📅 https://t.co/1iUlwzCiqu
- 22 February 2024 (13 messages)
-
Bottom right just tells you most recent trade value of xcp so current price -
@jdogresorg how often does the system look at .json files? For example, if I added new cards to my project's github today will it be examined at some point in the future?
-
The collection parsing script on xchain currently parses all projects once every 24 hours.
If you make an update and wait longer than 24 hours and things are still not getting updated , please feel free to reach out. -
I feel like a noob asking this -
but how do I place dex order on freewallet 🙂
-
for pair that doens't exist
-
gotta manually enter the new market in the searchbox and click the search button..... if you type in the search box, it filters EXISTING markes... but to create a NEW market... type in ASSET1/ASSET2 into the search box and click the search button..... that will take you directly to the market page.... .you then place a buy order and a sell order that will match one another..... once a market has one trade on it, it should appear in the "Markets" list within 24 hours
-
been a while since I revisited that code... a few years.. so may be remembering it wrong... you may just have to create a single order for the market to appear.... but, best to place matching buy/sell orders, so the orders actually execute a trade... after that point, for sure the market should show up within 24 hours
-
-
-
TLDR... type in your market ASSET1/ASSET2 and click the green button
-
videos on dp.university show you how to use most features of the wallet. Yes its dogewallet but basically identical
-
dp.university... very valuable resource built by @XCERXCP .... more and more CP community members stepping up over the past few years and writing documentation, howto videos, etc... the stuff that is necessary for a community to grow.... nice work 🙂
- 23 February 2024 (32 messages)
-
Hi jdog. It’s been 30ish hours since I updated my json. No banner has appeared. An example would be COCODILES. Not urgent, just giving you a heads up
-
ok thx... will dig into it when I have a lil time... ping me if you dont hear from me in next 24 hours... busy day
-
Maybe uninstall and reinstall? No changes to graphics display in recent releases.
-
have you tried restarting your computer? or tried disabling and then enabling your VPN (if you have one?)
-
what do your server settings look like?
-
it seems like you are not getting a response from the API to get the information shown
-
which version of FW are you using?
-
you can authenticate the version by clicking the logo on the top right
-
latest is 0.9.28
-
how about this?
-
have you tried this?
-
bring it back to xchain.io
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
-
match the defaults
-
close program then re-open it... try hitting refresh button in FW.... then try a restart of your computer
-
the issue is with your computer getting the API call back
-
doesnt suprise me host3 isnt giving you data, couple other people had this issue in XCP chat
-
Yeah, I always told people not to use anything other than xchain.io because accessing servers directly defeats, the purpose of the load balancers.
People are having issues using anything other than xchain.io because I re-organized servers and deleted the DNS records for host1-7 a few days ago.
If you hear of anyone else having issues, please relay this information, and tell them to use default API host xchain.io and testnet.xchain.io 👍🏻 -
i remember people switching in 2021 due to high site traffic - will relay this to users when its brought up
-
Thank you sir❤️
-
Doggfather (@DoggfatherCrew) on X
BTNS town hall meeting with the lead dev @jdogresorg Giving an update about the latest developments on the protocol level, the changes concerning the $SAT token, and the ongoing $GAS mint Set a reminder and add it to your calendar 📅 https://t.co/1iUlwzCiqu
- 24 February 2024 (38 messages)
-
Hi guys is all OK with wallet?
-
I had small amount btc sent to wallet, I received it.
-
As I was busy setting up dispenser tx was declined due to balance
-
Looked again no btc 0.00
-
But in the memepool I can see the balance
-
I can also see the balance on xchain
-
Just not in the Wallet
-
Probably just an issue with your firewall and the API request to get your BTC balance being blocked…. Try changing your IP address and getting on the VPN.
-
-
So this had happened to me last week, and I was being extra careful and double checking on the 2nd and 3rd transactions that it wasn't 0.00000001 entered
-
On the fourth one, I think I had gotten it to go through by reversing the order
-
Anyways, someone almost sold a RAREPEPE today for 0.00000004 BTC for what I suspect the same issue I encountered
-
-
They were lucky that it was below the minimum amount for BTC
-
-
wow the BTC-Pay bug coming in clutch holy shit
-
how was this caused? UI issue? what version of FW?
-
Mine was 13 days ago, so I can't say for sure. I have since updated it iirc
-
how does it happen then? putting 'satoshi's' instead of whole numbers or something?
-
I know that I was extra careful the 2nd and 3rd time, double checked and it displayed correctly on the pop up to confirm too
-
im guessing it had to have been a versions pre 0.9.23?
-
-
It must be reverting down to the integer like on multisends and you forget to add a decimal
-
if you dont know the version I would guess its pre 0.9.23
-
I think I was on 9.26 or .27
-
hmmm..... thats doesnt make it easy to pin down..... for a DEx order right?
-
I just checked my downloads... I upgraded to the 2nd last release during that sequence
-
So from 9.26 to 9.27, and now I have 9.28 running, which I have since downloaded
-
hmm is it possible you could show the process on the UI and then show the tx info for the outcome?
-
cause if it can be reproduced its 100% an issue
-
Based on the time of my download and the dex orders, the upgrade from 9.26 to 9.27 might have done the trick.
-
🤔
-
Order 1 - 09:01
Order 2 - 09:13
Order 3 - 09:13
Download - 09:24
Order 4 - 09:35 -
do you know who put the rarepepe order up? maybe get into contact and ask what version
-
i think its a high probability it was an issue with an older version in the case of the RAREPEPE/BTC trade.... but the change from 26 to 27 could be it too....
-
though the upgrades were only fee estimation so I dont know if it makes sense entirely
-
-
There were running 0.9.19
- 25 February 2024 (7 messages)
-
gotchya for that case that is most likely the reason
-
for your case it is strange it did so before updating to 0.9.27
-
but all in all looks like recent releases are working as intended for that function from 0.9.27 on
-
Yo! Just helped a fren close a dispenser and the Tx went through but the card never went into balances. 🙏
-
-
looks like it went to the origin address and not the source address
-
- 26 February 2024 (7 messages)
-
@jdogresorg did you find that any other project was having json update issues? I just dm'd you my github link if you have time this week
-
haven't heard any other complaints... your json looks valid, so could be issue with downloading the image or something... need to manually run the script and see waht it is doing to fix issue... but busy working on BTNS right now... will dig into the banner issuew hen I have some time
-
side-ntoe: banner system gonna be entirely reworked once xchain.io traffic is migrated to the new tokenscan.io block explorer and APIs
-
but yeah... you will still have the green banner 🙂
-
Thanks for the quick reply. Appreciate the info on the new banner system!
-
right now the banner system is ugly (ppl have to download a huge multi-meg file that maps assets to images)..... the new version will do away with this file and just display the collection info in the API call to get the token info 🙂
-
smaller, faster 🙂
- 27 February 2024 (5 messages)
-
can anyone explain why when logging into freewallet my history is showing under history tab but on balances there is absolutely nothing? not even the btc logo -
The Wallet history for an address doesn’t load until you switch to that address and then click the history tab and wait for the history to load
If you’re looking to review the history of your address, it is best to do that on a block chain Explorer not in the wallet …. The wallet history is just a quick summary of transactions, and not meant to be the way you view your history accurately.
The primary purpose of the Wallet is to show balances and allow people to perform transactions….. the history interfaces not always kept up-to-date with all the latest counterparty messages and features…. But xchain.io explorer is. -
Jdog, can we get the updates page updated to show 0.9.28 as latest vers? ❤️
https://freewallet.io/#updates -
yep... putting out a new release in a couple days.. so will make sure to update the website then
-
lets gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
- 28 February 2024 (14 messages)
-
Hello, how to check the private key of FREE WALLET wallet? who can help me -
please review the links in the pinned message, instructions for this is in the 0.9.23 user manual:
https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#displaying-the-seed-phrase-and-private-key-of-your-addresssFreewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
OK
-
btw a private key is address specific
-
each address will have its own unique private key
-
J-Dog (@jdogresorg) on X
Pretty cool bitcoin zippo lighter if anyone is in the market…. Just got it n pretty happy with the craftsmanship n quality🔥👍🏻 #Bitcoin #zippo https://t.co/kMmzT2qAXG
-
Hey guys,
I've been using DogeWallet browser version, which sorted and organized all my wallets and dispensers associated with the wallet perfectly.
Right now browser wallet (website) cannot be reached. I was provided by the desktop app wallet, but when I import all my PK I do not see any wallet with dispensers, only main wallet and some empty generated ones.
It is possible to resurrect browser version? Or how do i see main wallet with dispensers?
Thanks! -
private key == one address
-
12-word passphrase == infinite addresses
-
could be your missing "addresses" just need to be added back to your address (add address, select how many to add, poof they are added back to your wallet).... tho you said "private key".. which only ever links to ONE address
-
just clarifying terminology... the answer is in there somewhere 😛
-
might also want to check the pinned FAQ... lots of helpful info in there 🙂
-
Thanks for pointing that out, I will get into faq just in case
-
- 29 February 2024 (28 messages)
-
Hey I'm having an issue with my free wallet, i sent some money to cashapp and it didn't go through, it just kept saying Pending, So I realized that I must have not sent enough fees. The money was returned to me in the account, however I checked today and noticed it is gone. I noticed that the transaction sent to my cashapp still says Pending.
My question is, after btc bounces back into account, is there ever a time when the system will try to send it out again with the same credentials? -
FreeWallet Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 Feb 2024 (14)
- 02 Feb 2024 (7)
- 03 Feb 2024 (21)
- 05 Feb 2024 (30)
- 06 Feb 2024 (9)
- 07 Feb 2024 (7)
- 08 Feb 2024 (62)
- 09 Feb 2024 (40)
- 10 Feb 2024 (4)
- 13 Feb 2024 (16)
- 15 Feb 2024 (60)
- 16 Feb 2024 (39)
- 17 Feb 2024 (14)
- 18 Feb 2024 (1)
- 19 Feb 2024 (17)
- 20 Feb 2024 (14)
- 21 Feb 2024 (26)
- 22 Feb 2024 (13)
- 23 Feb 2024 (32)
- 24 Feb 2024 (38)
- 25 Feb 2024 (7)
- 26 Feb 2024 (7)
- 27 Feb 2024 (5)
- 28 Feb 2024 (14)
- 29 Feb 2024 (28)