GM Jdog. This must be a typo yeah? "Oracle price last updated: a year ago"

@jdogresorg

Not an error… Oracle wasn’t earning enough in fees to keep broadcasting prices.

Xchain platform has Oracle integrated into the platform so no need for individual oracles to broadcast price.

How's it going?

Winning

Good to hear

Going good…

Good to hear how ar bro, hopefully u restful and been catching some summer waves

Got a nice work life balance going🤙

That sounds tranquil, deffo something that we need to achieve for self growth, man gotta touch grass here n there

I feel I have a nice balance, but could always be tweeked better as life evolves

But deffo that is a nice goal we shud all aspire too, too much chaos in the world, is a small planet after all

How is btns doing?

Xchain platform is what I’ve been building… no longer working on BTNS since a year ago… https://t.me/XChainPlatform

Ahh yh, how's the platform going

Dev is going good… another couple months n should be pushing it out👍🏻

Jdog the legendary dev still devving, I would never have guessed 😉

Am I crazy or does time pass too fast these days

Need to touch more grass as my age increases

Either way, stay dank

❤️

Yup time flies when your doing what u love 💕

Keep doing wat ya luv, fkin awesome alpha motto

100% factually correct, passed every fact checker out there

Bit if u want longer life do something u don't like? Doesn't sound fair kekiky kek

I'll leave u guys with that painful conundrum, gn fother mukers

Growth comes from struggle, lessons are learned and you become a wiser older version of yourself💪

Facts

am getting signing transaction error. tried changing address back and forth and it didnt fix the issue

Make sure your on the latest version and try logging out of the wallet entirely, closing it, then opening and re-inputting your 12-word passphrase again n try again

I think I need to get the latest version on my phone. Do I have to go to github to do that? I keep getting error trying to sign send transaction

Oh yeah, the mobile version of free while it hasn’t been updated in a few years and the counterparty core developers decided to change the way that transactions are generated within counterparty and change them in such a way that they can no longer be signed by the mobile wallet…. They have the goal of stopping people from using freewallet and forcing users to use their wallet, and so then breaking transaction signing in freewallet mobile is one of the ways that they are trying to accomplish this task…. It is unfortunate but freewallet mobile version will no longer work to sign transactions until I get around to putting out an updated release, which won’t happen for a number of months as my focuses on building Xchain platform, an entirely new platform with more features and easier to use than counterparty

I have to update the desktop version right? I was getting the same type of message

Yeah, if you’re on the latest version of free wallet desktop, you should be able to sign the new version two transactions that counterparty currently generates

Beware yet another fake J-Dog impersonator scammer making the rounds

They hover waiting to steal. Worst kind of people 😐

For real… go create some AI generated NFT artwork, slap it on a token, put it in a dispenser and shill your goods… got more respect for people who do that than scammers who try to just prey on victims

You're saying I need to sign the unsigned and signed transaction part with that has my address? (source) lol Idk how it works

The signing should be automatic… just use FreeWallet as you usually do n when you do a tx it should sign n broadcast if your on the latest version

Only other thing is if I have a pending tx from before? I tried to see if that was the case but I'm not sure how to know. I checked the last send but not sure how to track it down and if I received the asset I bought

check your address with mempool.space and that should let you know if you have any pending txs.... either way, you should be able to sign a tx normally regardless of if you have a pending one or not 🙂

Don't worry. Sending from rarepepewallet also doesn't work.

Just encountered him/her. Sends you a fake rarepepewallet.com link

To revalidate the wallet. Muhahahaha

I just sign it with whatever I want? Like my handle or something?

What you’re signing a transaction with is a signature that proves that you control the address that you’re trying to do transactions from

He doesn’t even like bacon

Alright. That's simple enough lol

hey friends, just a quick question. are ordinals not viewable in the app? having trouble viewing one that was just sent to my wallet. shows correct address on ordinals site but not in wallet (txn appears to be showing up in wallet history tho)

cheers! thx for the opinions / help.

Link to the specific ordinal that you’re having problems zooming and I’ll look into it

https://ordinals.com/inscription/2021cda0fe6dc8a1e128f57226fd47c7cbb1b17d91e891a347393217d83b5124i0

Tyvm J

how about a link to the token on counterparty that references the ordinal that your having problems viewing... thx

Hello to everyone ! I’ve a problem while sending a rarepepe to emblem vault

when I try to send a rarepepe to emblem vault I get this error : error while trying to sign send transaction

Are you using free wallet, mobile, or free while the desktop? If you’re using free wallet, mobile it no longer works because the counterparty core Dave’s changed the transaction version number to 2 instead of 1….. so you will need to use free wallet desktop if you’re trying to sign transactions using the latest version of counterparty

I use a old desktop version tbh but never had issues till now 😁 should I upgrade to resolve the problem ?

Yeah, you should upgrade to the latest version of free wallet desktop…. I put out a new release about six months ago that handle signing version two transactions….. actually it decodes the version two transaction and translates it into a version. One transaction again basically undoing what the counterparty core devs forced on the community….

Thanks j-dog for the help .. What I need to be sure to have to don’t make errors? Just the 12 words , right ?

Yup just the 12 words…. Though you should be able to upgrade the wallet in place and not have to enter your 12 Word passphrase again…. But for sure you should have a backup of your 12 word passphrase, as well as as a backup of the private keys of any addresses that you have imported into free wallet, desktop

Thanks j-dog! Will try rn 🫡

Now everything is working

I didn’t even need to put newly the 12 words nor priv key

Thanks really much !

OOOoooo look at all the stars

Signing a message from an address in free wallet should be very very simple….. no reason not to🤷🏻‍♂️

Even more so after been told step by step

WTB 70XCP no good dispensers open rn

Hi jDog, yes I could do it, but he's very toxic and makes threats.

I told him I would do it in time and he said he had been very patient, but he says I'm not a scammer, but he's been doing spam on me, a lack of respect.

I think it’s just a misunderstanding, quickest way to clear things up is sign a message to prove address ownership n then no more words need to be said…. As the saying goes, don’t trust, verify.

In any case, I can see both sides… as a relatively new person in the community can seem harsh to be met with such criticism…. At the same time this community is pretty tight knit and goes out of its way to protect people within the community from scammers…

I make no judgments either way, and respectfully request that you two figure it out on your own…. Either by signing a message so there is no doubt that you control the address you say you do, or by stopping communication with one another…. No one really enjoys seeing public feuds like this. 👍🏻

Exactly. Well, I've been here since 2018, and at least you're a person who knows how to understand. I understand that there are many scammers, but he doesn't know how to deal with people. I'd be happy to verify it for you.

Probably the simplest way to do it would be to publicly broadcast a message from your address that says verifying ownership of address by LVS…. Then you can just link the transaction here or anywhere else that you wanna proove that you own the address.

Ok, I'll do it! Tell me the steps, JDog. 🙏🏻

Just go to free wallet, change to the address that you want to proove that you own and from the main menu choose broadcast message…. Then type something like “ address ownership verification by LVS” and then click broadcast…. Once the transaction is mined paste the link here.

Just to quickly comment, @Lvsdesigner is a good guy

Okay, I'll do it.

Is he the one behind the pepeye physical coins? Or that someone else? Got so many contacts n history with ppl here it’s tough to keep everyone straight

No he's not @L_vs_D

Got ya…. Thx for the clarification… love my coins from that guy

no

2 different guys - both legit AFAIK

156a4b93f74e72224a88f30b9bdd47319934d2aaadc812607156fed70809a3c9

I gladly passed on the verification message to you.

https://cp20.tokenscan.io/tx/3017916

looks legit to me.... for what it is worth.

Seems you have managed to verify, strange how you wouldn't before within 3 weeks, guess you wanted me to call you out so that you could paint me out as a bad guy because I said there are rules in the auction house, but at least we now know

I think you have to have empathy to work with the public, especially in this medium of beautiful projects. In all my years, I've never had a problem with anyone, and I hope I never will.

I hope you delete your messages from the groups and retract them. Like a good man.

Thanks JDog for your help

Thank you all, I will ignore the poison, controversy and sarcasm. I will not continue wasting my energy on toxicity. Thank you all. 👍🏻

Well u better take a look at yourself to cleanse yourself as uve been pritty toxic yourself

having similar names is weird but ok 🤷‍♂

weird. did a send last night - send confirmed (https://tokenscan.io/tx/3018504)

but receiving address doesnt show it in the balances (same issue for tokenscan/horizon/xcp dot io)

https://tokenscan.io/address/bc1q4v9rnt27fljdku8awwraec3ws3wv0uv8gfhkau
https://horizon.market/explorer/addresses/bc1q4v9rnt27fljdku8awwraec3ws3wv0uv8gfhkau
https://www.xcp.io/address/bc1q4v9rnt27fljdku8awwraec3ws3wv0uv8gfhkau

thoughts? protocol issue maybe?

Shows a dispenser was opened

oh im dumb then

thank you

was opening a few and didnt realize that one got opened - man i miss opening a dispenser in 1 tx

https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/issues/3053#issuecomment-2880892611

the latest genius move by adam and team.... change the ledger / txlist / messages hashes which have been rock solid for 10+ years.... so now no longer able to validate that data was parsed into the CP database correctly using hashes from many years ago... such a sad state of affairs when one person does what they want without any consideration for what is best for the community 😢️️️️️️

and of course, he put forth the proposal in febuary on github (where no one really visits or pays attention)... so that now he can say "well clearly there is consensus on this issue, there was plenty of time to object"...... ugh... its like writing a note and pinning it to a tree deep in the forest and then months later saying "well look, everyone agrees, no one objected".... yeah, cuz no one saw, because by design, you want your ideas to go through without any objections

ok...enough rambling on how fucked up CP is going... back to work on xchain platform 🙂

Any xcp for sale?
I need below 1xcp

0.5 precisely

Can't find that on disp

Who knows what is best for the community? 🤣

Also using GitHub for development discussions is pretty standard, not sure what alternatives you would recommend

@jdogresorg if an asset is registered to "null" does that mean someone minted it but the quantity is "0"?

No way to make it available again correct?

It doesn't show up when searching Tokenscan, but the null message pops up in Freewallet when trying to mint it

No asset just name 🤔

It’s also a great way to post things where people in the community are not aware of them and to not allow anyone that is not semi technical to participate in sharing their opinion…

I would agree that github is a great place to report issues and get them resolved, however for suggesting new features and discussing those features with a large community that is not necessarily technical and 99% of the people do not have or understand how to use github it is less than ideal .

Point in case, if you look at the linked item, it was out there open for discussion for many many months and yet no one commented … however, now that the code changes are in place. There are a large number of people who are confused and upset and concerned about the hashes changing…… so clearly there is a community that wants to discuss this issue and is affected by this issue and was unaware of this issue until it was changed in code.

We used to have a counterparty improvement proposal process where all changes were discussed openly in the forums at length before any suggested code changes were proposed … though those were thrown in the garbage can pretty quickly when Adam took control again

It could be a failed asset issuance where someone tried to register the asset Name, but didn’t have enough XP to register it…. You should just be able to ignore that pop-up message and try to issue it again and if no one owns it, you should get it

okay thanks man! It does say it's available on the now closed coindaddy :)

Moving on to bigger n better things bruv😊👍🏻

As to your question of who knows best for the community…. That’s a tough question to answer, but it is certainly not just two or three developers making the decisions for everyone, as is the situation now….consensus is hard, but in the past, it has worked and changes and update updates have been able to be made without such controversies and chain forks as we have had in the past year.

Take a look at atomic swaps something that majority of the community didn’t ask for yet was forced on the community by the developers and now what do we have? A grand total of one successful atomic swap in the past three months…. Definitely doesn’t seem like a project that’s being driven by community demands🤷🏻‍♂️

CIP's were pretty awesome before they were demolished

for the record the community (imo) was pretty gung ho about getting atomic swaps - but it was under the guise and promise we could buy and sell xcp assets on magic eden / ordinal friendly centralized marketplaces ..... other than trustless swaps on chain using btc, we wanted marketplaces to support our assets in a similar way they already do now with ordinals.... but alas.... xcp still doesnt exist to 95% of the community because "ordinals" are the only btc nfts

also was always confused about how all block explorers using xcp orders (xcp dex) can see any open orders on the protocol but only atomic swap 'confirmed swaps' are protocol wide public....

there is FireMints, XCP. ninja, Horizon, and Universe

but not much traffic

i was promised magic eden

i thought ASs would change the game too lol

maybe their bags are too filled with the "1st ever nft jpegs on btc"

they need unload before xcp support lol

its honestly really sad.... the "@ nftAIcheologist" on twitter thinks Rare Pepe is ETH because searching OS and ME thats how it pops up (emblem).... really really sad one of the earliest bitcoin protocols is only known because it got wrapped to ETH

thats not billions lol but that vol is worth the add imo

meanwhile we were told to integrate ordinal style swaps and wed be good - we could join the (real) party.....

nope.

and EV was only trying to help imo. just offer another option to trade

oh ive been here since before dispensers - its just sad to see man

back in my day we were excited about swapping xcp to pepecash and now we drool over ETH offers

sigh

ofc youre an OG ser. you have actually done a lot to try to get xcp the respect and eyes it deserves

i could do more

we all can ser

too much history to not get the respect it deserves

and we still have builders doing their thing

I think even there not much volume these days

Even if it's pennies

Wrapping XCP assets in Eth always seemed very dumb and greedy. Rares should he exclusive

Now Eth pepes tanked the market

I bet a lot of them get lost

also true

but many also sent there initially in 2021

sent a bunch of pepes to eth via emblem in 2021, tried to unwrap all that i could in 2022 (but gas fees make it a dicey proposition)

i still have a bunch in the durex, just waiting on them - but they accessible

Yeah they sold for some high amounts. I'm sure Looney and Leary made a buck

Counterpartys BIG L's

Yes so many dead emblem vaults, don't remind me

Shame price history wasn't transfered to the data when migrated

In theory should attract more people to understand the origins, and bring volume to cp assets, but people still believe ordinals first bitcoin nfts

I guess lost lots without been wrapped as well , joint pepe sold for 3 eth recently, mayby in the future lost will mean value, like Pepeterson majority held by dead/sleeping wallet, untouched 8 years and wallet has over 0.11btc in it untouched since 2017.

I wounder if they understand https://tokenscan.io/address/1BurnPepexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAK33R