- 01 August 2023 (155 messages)
-
Joined. -
Multisend Issue with Not Signing Second TX - v0.9.23 · Issue #152 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktopSome users are experiencing an issue where a Multisend fails on the second Signing of Transaction in v0.9.23 These sends do not include subassets (if that matters) Some solutions I have seen that m...
-
added that fix to the issues
-
Joined. -
Sometimes it's under-pay, low tx fee. Now it is overpaying. Freewallet picked for itself 0.00005825 BTC as tx fee when I put 0.00003456 BTC as tx fee.
This self decision by my freewallet is worrisome. -
Sometimes it's under-pay, low tx fee, something which has caused 14 of my recent txs to get stuck.
Now it is overpaying. Freewallet picked for itself 0.00005825 BTC as tx fee when I put 0.00003456 BTC as tx fee. In the second image, it uses 0.00006750 BTC instead of my 0.00003456 BTC input.
This self decision by my freewallet is worrisome.
Somebody help. -
@AdeKrypto we recently SOLVED this underpaying issue here:
-
multisend fee issue on v0.9.19 · Issue #150 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
@AdeKrypto mentioned as issue with Freewallet v0.9.19 automatically sending with a fee of 0.00001 BTC instead of the desired fee entered. In this case 0.00005 Video: cryptoace_compressed.mp4 Tx ID:...
-
Since you are now using v0.9.23 the high fee does not have the same issue you were having before
-
HIGH setting is going to be high enough now
-
I'm using high setting, yes. Then I input a number higher than the high setting but the app chose a way too higher number.
That's my point ser. -
Can anyone explain to me why one tx with a btc fee of 0.00004 was 16.1 sat/vb but then 20 minutes later the same tx with a btc fee of 0.0004 was 6.0 sat/vb?
-
-
-
-
the percentage change from blocks (avg sat/vb) doesnt explain to me a 300% difference in sat/vb fee
-
If it helps at all @AdeKrypto I'm having an issue picking the correct fee for transactions too
-
both of the tx's above i used a fee higher than the "high" setting
-
That's a fraction of what's happening with mine. At least it is the fee you input not that it decided for you to use a way too higher number than the "higher than high setting " you used.
-
show to me that the fee (btc amount) you picked in Freewallet 0.9.23 is the same fee you see on your transaction
-
my issue is not 'the fee from freewallet is off' from my tx
-
its general question about how sat/vb is related to btc fee amount
-
or i guess different
-
we had this issue solved here (im assuming the fee you are picking is the correct fee that is showing on your tx now with 0.9.23
-
No, I picked 0.00003567 BTC but in the txs, the fee used were 0.00005825 BTC and 0.00006750 BTC.
-
multisend or single send?
-
Issuance and locking supply.
-
so two separate tx's?
-
Yes
-
if true this is concerning
-
and not happening to me, nor reported by other users at this time
-
i know its annoying and time consuming
-
but is there a way you can record the fee you pick on Freewallet - then include the tx info after to show this difference?
-
just like you did with the previous issue
-
Unless I will have to record the next tx I might have.
-
that is correct, I'm not hearing this issue with other users and i want to confirm that Freewallet is "messing up" the btc amount fee
-
like i said I know its annoying and you have gone through it a few times
-
but its the only way we can verify the information is correct when the issue isnt happening to other users
-
Maybe many aren't looking yet but I'm a pleb, don't have much BTC so it's easy to note the mishap.
-
okay, try using the Testnet
-
if you dont have enough btc
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
it will cost you nothing and should theoretically produce the same issue without loss of funds
-
but on my end when I test 0.9.23 and check the fee, Freewallet has successfully set the fee right for me
-
Will I test it on the same app I'm using?
-
yes read this please
-
check how many utxo inputs are in each tx
if your wallet has a lot of dust utxos and the second send had to get composed of multiple utxo's, that's a heavier payload in byte size terms, so for the same fee, more bytes, worse ratio -
and the problem is there's no utxo dust estimator in freewallet... so you don't know from one send to the next if you're about to choke on a dust bunny
-
I will read and revert to you ser.
-
read also what RPW wrote above
-
it seems Freewallet does not have a "UTXO dust estimator" so certain tx's might come out different depending on your utxo's
-
which i do not fully understand yet, and despite your tx's being "too high of a fee" it might be something related to that
-
so the answer at the end of the day is "always overpay" by ALOT
-
for now.
-
Okay....but I think you saw the stuck txs on the mempool the last time? I have 14 of them.
-
if they were less than this and dont get confirmed they will be purged and funds returned to you:
-
Lemme check them
-
13 of the 14 txs are either 4.46 sat/vB or 4.48 sat/vB.
The one is 5.09/ sat/vB -
i would recommend using the CPFP but it seems you might not have enough BTC to cover the extra cost for 14 tx's so right now youll just have to wait
-
that is the best information I can give at the moment
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
Joined. -
i just tested CPFP and you dont send "0" btc to yourself you send it all
-
and use quite a large fee
-
is CPFP what you are referencing? Did I type it wrong in the FAQ?
-
Im not sure where I reference sending "0" to yourself
-
"In the event you are stuck in the unconfirmed state on your transaction you can try to "speed it up" by issuing a second transaction from that same address, but this time with a much higher fee. This second transaction (Child tx) will need a high enough fee to cover itself as well as the transaction that came before it (Parent tx).
In Freewallet this second transaction can be a transaction for any XCP function, but in this use case it is most common to be a BTC send "to yourself." Basically the bitcoin miners will have a higher chance of confirming both transactions once the Child transaction is chosen to be confirmed by the bitcoin miners. Just make sure to not only check what Freewallet is suggesting for a "high" fee, but to also add a higher amount to cover the Parent transaction. Two to Three times the amount of the "high" settings should work in this circumstance." -
yes - but technically how much you send doesnt matter (it can be a very low amount) - its the fee COVERING the parent transaction thats important
-
i just say send MAX to yourself because it will also consolidate your UTXO's
-
I will revise it, I think I can write it better
-
changed to:
-
"In the event you are stuck in the unconfirmed state on your transaction you can try to "speed it up" by issuing a second transaction from that same address, but this time with a much higher fee. This second transaction (Child tx) will need a high enough fee to cover itself as well as the transaction that came before it (Parent tx).
In Freewallet this second transaction can be a transaction for any XCP function, but in this use case it is most common to be a BTC send "to yourself." Also it is common here to send the MAX amount of BTC to youself as it will consolidate the UTXO's on your address. Though this is not technically needed, the Child transaction just has to cover the fee's for both so the amount of BTC here doesnt really matter.
Basically the bitcoin miners will have a higher chance of confirming both transactions once the Child transaction is chosen to be confirmed by the bitcoin miners. Just make sure to not only check what Freewallet is suggesting for a "high" fee, but to also add a higher amount to cover the Parent transaction. Two to Three times the amount of the "high" settings should work in this circumstance." -
glad to, Im learning as I write too when it comes to CPFP
-
but happy to test this when it happened to me today and verified you do not have to use electrum
-
Though I am gonna revise a new issue about UTXO's and how Freewallet should show this information in detail as to not confuse users in the future
-
revised again for the OCD'ers
-
In the event you are stuck in the unconfirmed state on your transaction you can try to "speed it up" by issuing a second transaction from that same address, but this time with a much higher fee. This second transaction (Child tx) will need a high enough fee to cover itself as well as the transaction that came before it (Parent tx).
In Freewallet this second transaction can be a transaction for any XCP function, but in this use case it is most common to be a BTC send "to yourself." Also it is common here to send the MAX amount of BTC to youself as it will consolidate the UTXO's on your address. Though this is not technically needed to send MAX BTC amount, the Child transaction just has to have a high enough fee to cover the fee's for both. So the amount of BTC here "sent" in the transaction doesnt really matter for solving this issue, its just getting that second fee amount correct that is important.
Basically the bitcoin miners will have a higher chance of confirming both transactions once the Child transaction is chosen to be confirmed by the bitcoin miners. Just make sure to not only check what Freewallet is suggesting for a "high" fee, but to also add a higher amount to cover the Parent transaction. Three to Four times the amount of the "high" setting should work in this circumstance. -
so let me understand here
-
are you trying to consolidate UTXO's or speed up a previous tx with CPFP?
-
theres two different FAQ's
-
initially i thought it was to speed up with cpfp, but i tried the faq you wrote and it still comes up with this error
-
holy crap thats alot to "need" in btc
-
first off try restarting freewallet
-
no
-
just closing the program and re opening it
-
i think the FAQ you are looking for is here: https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#failure-to-send-not-enough-btc-in-walletFreewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
let me know if you have read that already
-
MOST of the time that happens to me it is fixed with restarting freewallet or changing the fees or btc amount slightly
-
has the BTC that was sent confirmed?
-
Try sending slightly under MAX for the BTC amount
-
ok
-
try this - i may have explained it weird in the FAQ but that is what i am referencing
-
hmm - i would try it in electrum then
-
Electrum Bitcoin Wallet
Electrum Bitcoin Wallet.
-
that is probably it
-
in that case you dont "actually" have the amount of btc it is trying to send
-
"yet"
-
because it's unconfirmed
-
try sending the amount (or less) blockchain.com is showing you as the "Max" amount
-
whatever that may be
-
gotchya get back to me and see if that worked
-
perfect, I think Freewallet is just showing the unconfirmed balance so that confused you for "max" amount
-
glad i could help
-
i reference (to be safe) in the FAQ to do Triple or Quadruple the "high" fee but keep in touch when that confirms to make sure the Child actually paid for the unconfirmed Parent transaction
-
all good, should be enough if all fee's are added together in the miners view
-
but stay in touch if not
-
this is what I would do
-
If the Parent tx did not pay for the Child tx
-
might have to use a higher fee
-
sorry you are burning BTC here, it can be confusing to get it all right
-
from dm's looks like popov didnt have the same success I did using freewallet for CPFP
-
just tried sending a new transaction and electrum propose by default to include the unconfirmed output 🔥
-
^ i think it may be that electrum can automatically see the UTXO needed to carry the Parent tx with the Child tx and Freewallet cannot at the moment
-
Any electrum heads feel free to chime in if you know
-
this is the information i gathered from Quentin resolving this with electrum
-
if it works let me know the article - its not my intention to explain Electrum in a Freewallet FAQ but it would be very helpful to reference to in the future
-
How to do a manual Child Pays For Parent transaction in Electrum
Sometimes you make a transaction that is going to get stuck beyond the miner’s ability to be included in the next block, and below the…
-
Joined. -
😎
-
wondering why the weight of the freewallet tx is calculated under even wen I do a tx double the current high fee rate? Thanks
-
Bitcoin Transaction: 29a97b359eed2195e18f256c817a6790e6a25bf94a54fdb3fe938a86cdb8e35f
Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with mempool.space
-
fir a fren
-
Payment was drawn from 9 UTXOs. So effective payment is extremely low. -
To avoid this. Consolidate your balance every so often to have an efficient wallet
- 02 August 2023 (117 messages)
-
How do you calculate for the utxo’s through freewallet wen you dont know how many there are? This send was done from a dispenser back to home wallet so it makes since that there are mutiple utxo’s.
-
I understand the consolidation part for the main wallet but fir dispensers it doesn’t make since to do that as it would be the same problem with the utxo’s for the initial tx?
-
Thanks fir da help doe
-
Also electrum wont give me the option CPFP to push the tx. Any idea why?
-
Joined. -
anyone having the same issue? i used high fee transaction
-
Ive had a pending btc transfer for 12 days now using a high fee -
I'm finding out now you just cannot calculate using Freewallet alone. Which is why many users overpay by a significant amount to be safe. Many users do not know how many UTXO's are built up on their address (including me)
-
so this article didnt work for your purpose when using electrum? https://medium.com/@oshiiko3679/how-to-do-a-manual-child-pays-for-parent-transaction-in-electrum-31fe0f642187How to do a manual Child Pays For Parent transaction in Electrum
Sometimes you make a transaction that is going to get stuck beyond the miner’s ability to be included in the next block, and below the…
-
this screenshot only gives the information of how long the transaction has been "stuck" you will have to click the Transaction Hash to see more detailed information about sat/vb and btc fee amount used
-
again you will have to read the Transaction Hash for more* information as why
-
Joined. -
Maybe update the docs link to docs.counterparty.io? I’m not exactly sure which is correct but I believe doc links is a common issue or topic.
-
will be coming soon
-
lots of other website stuff to take care of
-
Updating Information on Counterparty.io
It is my opinion that the counterparty.io website is outdated and does not accurately represent linking to the best educational information for Counterparty. This post includes the starting process of trying to publicly correct and revise information about each page of the Counterparty website to try to include topics like: CIP’s, wallet documentation, support pages and our spectacular history throughout Counterparty’s lifetime on counterparty.io. The first impression most users will have in ...
-
Freewallet and future Counterwallet FAQ's and new documentation is going to be linked there in the future
-
the FW FAQ is just a draft atm because I am continually updating it with new FAQ's as well as tweaking/perfecting each sentence and getting community feedback to make sure it is all correct
-
process will take some time
-
docs.counterparty.io has NO information about Freewallet at this time
-
would LOVE some feedback on any part of the Freewallet FAQ if you review it and find something that should be fixed or added
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop · Discussion #138
It has been asked for and needed for some time now, so I present the - Draft 5 of the Freewallet FAQ I used Freewallet Desktop v0.9.23 to write this up with the help of the Counterparty Forums, Cou...
-
also if you have feedback on counterparty.io would also love to hear your thoughts by replying to this post on the forums
-
are you saying to add docs.counterparty.io to the Freewallet FAQ or to add the Freewallet FAQ to docs.counterparty.io ?
-
the problem with CPFP with electrum is I dont get an option for CPFP. I then went to btcnitro and it said it was unable to do a fee increase because the initial fee was to low. IDK. Never seen the inability for CPFP/increase fee before.
FYI-the initial fee was set almost double the high fee setting and it still wasn’t enough. -
Thanks for the info and the new github
-
Does your freewallet.io show a MAX send?
-
Enter your receiving address
-
okay, just double checking you used this to try with electrum?
-
what version are you using Northrn?
-
Not at the station
-
I'm going to check that max send
-
Don't remember seeing it
-
on my version 0.9.23 i have the ability to max send
-
Maybe J snuck it in?
-
No i don’t see a max send
-
though it doesnt really LOOK like a "button" but its there
-
Im on 0.9.23
-
-
-
click the MAX
-
like i said it doesnt look like a "button" but it works to click on it
-
Never realized this MAX button
-
But yes that's perfect
-
Idea your selecting all your balances. And moving them onto 1 UTXO
-
Yeah i have that but when yer cleaning the btc out of the wallet with no dust behind you subtract the total amount from the fee
-
But if you select MAX send. With a set 20 000 sat fee. The fee should be subtracted from the MAX send.
-
But your pre planning for the 20 UTXO balances being consolidated
-
3000 sat fee 100% will get stuck if consolidating a full send from 10-20+ UTXO ledger balance.
-
With this I was helping someone send the btc to their home wallet from a dispenser so a consolidation would happen from the dispenser to the home wallet
-
?
-
Yup. Ledger is ledger.
-
Nothing to do with the wallet. It's mempool and Miner work
-
I didnt think it would subtract the exact amount of fee frome the total available. Gotta try it
-
I have found recently the High setting does NOT seem to take into account your UTXO's and I still have to write out the Issue for the github about this - because it even confused me
-
it would consolidate the UTXO's from the dispenser wallet, but NOT the home wallet
-
and by consolidate i mean it would send all of them to home wallet
-
Right. Ever so often it’s a good idea to send total amount of btc round trip to consolidate UTXO’s
-
correct, many xcp functions done over time builds up a LOT
-
Ant ideas on how I can help the fren push the tx since electrum and btcnitro arent working?
-
Bitcoin Transaction: 29a97b359eed2195e18f256c817a6790e6a25bf94a54fdb3fe938a86cdb8e35f
Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with mempool.space
-
Send $30 in BTC to that wallet
-
Then MAX send it to itself with a 20 000 sat fee
-
That's probably like $8? $10? in gas fee but should push that TX that's in the mempool
-
Need the miner to recognize your wallet's Broadcasted TX
-
And the miner should mine both TXs.
-
Then can safely MAX send the Balance to home wallet
-
In theory, I'm sure you just use the HOME wallet address instead of sending the balance to itself
-
Facts. I will give it a try. I did that yesterday but not that much fee and it was from the dispenser to the home (same path as the stuck one) wallet not back to itself. I see how that big of a fee might help getting attention.
-
Thanks
-
"It was from the Dispenser to the home (same path as stuck one) wallet not back to itself " -----this should of worked if you had done a large enough fee
-
I didn’t and used about 9000 sat fee
-
Ya 9000 for what your doing too low
-
You'll get away with 20 000. Mempool still cheap.
-
Just checked it was 8000
-
I've spent way before but it's all relating to the how data heavy your TX
-
And UTXOs
-
For what your doing $10 fee should be good
-
$3,4 would be very lucky
-
Yeah it went through just not big enough to get the attention.
-
Thanks for the help fam. Appreciate you
-
Joined. -
Ayyye
-
ayyy
-
looks like you are using Freewallet Mobile?
-
Waiting on some cobbee homie
-
ayyyy
-
COCO FAM
-
I have it up on desktop as well
-
coco is everywhere -
gotchya, which version of FW desktop?
-
scary
-
Thx for helping out fam
-
Latest version
-
No updates avail.
-
0.9.23?
-
you can check by clicking the logo in the upper left
-
Yes
-
cause in Freewallet Desktop you can select a custom fee
-
and I found in my own experience depending on UTXO count on your BTC addy "High" may not be high enough
-
Hurd. I usually just set to highest. Which is what I did
-
Hurd
-
hurd chef
-
Anyway to speed it up? Or is it stuck like chuck?
-
You know what industry I’m in. Lolz.
-
there is, gimme a sec will link you an FAQ for CPFP
-
lol or you just watched Ramsey or "The Bear"
-
The bear was dope.
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
I successfully sped up a TX for myself just using Freewallet, but some users like to use Electrum and follow this tutorial: https://medium.com/@oshiiko3679/how-to-do-a-manual-child-pays-for-parent-transaction-in-electrum-31fe0f642187How to do a manual Child Pays For Parent transaction in Electrum
Sometimes you make a transaction that is going to get stuck beyond the miner’s ability to be included in the next block, and below the…
-
Let me check this out real quick. Oh, and dope new coco homie. I’m always down for trade. New sub bout to go up if I can get this cobbee yo.
-
i specifically specialize in Melons
-
-
Everybody. I mean everybody, loves a set of good melons. Am I right?
-
feel free to get back to me in this chat if the FAQ helped and if the info I provided helped you solved your issue
-
Most def fam. 🙏
- 03 August 2023 (48 messages)
-
The link in the pinned mag takes me to a page with no docs for counterparty or fw. I’m on mobile, may be a problem on my side but no docs at all for me.
-
AH i see what you mean, yes I accidently linked to the old docs site for counterparty
-
thank you for letting me know I way misunderstood your statement
-
though it is also my intention to get these Freewallet FAQ questions developed and added to the docs.counterparty.io in the future sometime
-
Hi there,
I have same isuue. Have you solved this problem? -
what is it you are trying to do ? sending BTC? minting a token?
-
Jdog referenced on the above post this process to pin it down
-
It could be something related to an error having that address broadcast a transaction, but let's get some information
-
i know that sounds like, really bland and simple and what what the error "tells you"
-
but from what jdog said
-
Maybe related to ur pending txs…. Open debug console… copy signed tx… broadcast urself via a tool like https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/pushtx/
-
it looks like you can open the debug console and copy the signed tx you tried to send
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
you can use this guide to see where to use the debug option (click logo on upper left) then click debug
-
I havent personally looked through the debug but you would have to locate the signed tx you tried to send
-
it looks like from what jdog explained you can use https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/pushtx/ to see the specific error the bitcoin network is giving you
-
and could pin down the issue from there
-
as for your send, I just gotta ask, what fee are you using? and have you sent bitcoin from the address on freewallet before?
-
aka, is this the first time you are seeing this issue on this address?
-
what version of freewallet are you using?
-
-
okay
-
i havent ran into this issue personally so i have to try to get down to all possible things that could go wrong
-
have you tried closing the program and re-opening it, then resending the tx?
-
have you tried using different fee's? (maybe higher than the "high" setting)
-
and also is there more than enough btc to cover the fee?
-
PLUS the send you would like to do?
-
Lastly, if you have used this address many times have you ever "consolidated your UTXO's"? ... its common if so to have seen this error in the past described below... has this error "not enough btc..." ever happened before this failed tx send? https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#failure-to-send-not-enough-btc-in-walletFreewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
basically is there more than enough btc to cover everything? I know it sounds obvious I just have to check
-
also when looking at this fix using debug console and manually "broadcasting a tx" using blockcypher, is that something you need more help or documentation to do?
-
I rebooted my PC and doubled tx Fee and was able to send the BTC!
-
-
awesome this is great news! This helps me to write a list of steps users can do to fix this issue
-
come back if you have any issues.... or cool ideas on how to make it all better :)
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
Thank you for creating this group!
I am trying my best to learn how to animate my artwork, simple for now because I am quite technically challenged!!! -
And I'm trying to figure out the pros and cons...and effects that Ordinals are having on Counterparty tokenized art pieces.
-
So... please don't mind me if I come over at some point to pick you guys' brains eventually!
(I am hoping soon!) -
Thanks again!!!
-
no worries! feel free to ask away, check pinned message for a bunch of education!
-
I shall!!!
once I have a few digital works completed, Ima gonna bug ya! (I will def try read and do what I can on my own, of course, cus I do learn a lot better by doing...) - 05 August 2023 (16 messages)
-
Joined. -
Fee issues, sat/vb, "high" setting and Freewallet not showing UTXO info · Issue #153 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
I have been reviewing the issues coming in for users on the Freewallet Telegram (https://t.me/freewallet_io) and I have noticed a big discrepancy between new users and knowledge of UTXO's, how ...
-
My thoughts on Freewallet Fee settings, anyone feel to review and rip it up, good or bad. just trying to make using Freewallet easier to understand and a smoother 'new user' process in general
-
Releases · DogepartyXDP/dogewallet-desktopDesktop wallet for Win/Mac/Linux which supports Dogecoin and Dogeparty - DogepartyXDP/dogewallet-desktop
-
it's a special freewallet version
-
no you can use testnet on 0.9.23
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
Settings - Wallet - Network - Bitcoin Core (Testnet)
-
super cool. definitely something to research/post on https://forums.counterparty.io/ and https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/cips/discussions
-
exciting!!
-
i see, that must be difficult
- 07 August 2023 (1 messages)
-
Joined. - 08 August 2023 (87 messages)
-
I’m about to flip a table
-
I keep getting that dang error composing issuance tx via API: insufficient btc at addy message
-
Wallet has plenty
-
-
Send your full balance to yourself
-
Or if it's a fresh balance. And you know you don't have plenty of UTXO created.....just click it super fast
-
I’ve had balance in wallet for atleast a week
-
So resend to self?
-
Is it a fresh address?
-
No
-
OK so it isn't the anti-spam
-
Addy is a few weeks old
-
But you've used it before?
-
Yeah it worked an hour ago
-
Now it’s doing this
-
👍
-
So either it's glitch. OR the balance is sitting on multiple UTXOs and wallet error gets triggered
-
Basically just trying to lock a token supply
-
Just click it
-
K
-
Yes been there.
-
Just glitch 99% chance. Just click select it more then once....can't lock a token more then once anyways
-
Wow that worked lmaooooo
-
Thank you
-
Degen Life
-
👍
-
-
-
Hahahaha
-
Hopefully J fixes that glitch
-
I saw you fixed the error.. but Nardo I'd love to see if this FAQ would have been helpful to you in that situation. Anything I can add or change on this?
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
Its a recurring error so I’ll give the consolidating UTXO tip a try next time. Thanks @davesta
-
Okay ty... You solved it .. how though?
-
Was it simply changing the fee or something like that?
-
I just button smashed
-
LOL
-
Spammed the send
-
The gaming generation
-
What was your KD?
-
-
Sorry, KD?
-
It's a gaming term
-
Oh lol
-
Kill to death ratio
-
Am I the only nerd here?
-
-
I ranked on top 10 world leaderboards in gears of war
-
Was invited to participate in first ever tournament.. and that was the point in my life I realized I was spending too much time gaming lmao
-
... top 10 could a paid alot
-
Streamers make 100k plus a year if sponsored and grindin
-
I was really smart and took on student loans instead
-
Wish my dad told me that when I was a kid
-
He said get off ur ass and go get a job
-
Anyway. Glad it got resolved. Come back if you have any Freewallet issues
-
Thank you ser
-
Been trying to document them and eventually put them on the website
-
-
Nope… not the only nerd here😜 k/d 5.6 😜
-
Fuck off
-
5.6
-
On console ?
-
Lol… DMZ baybe
-
That's dangerous
-
Yes… Xbox
-
I only hunt teams
-
😜
-
Haha
-
No WAY. On what game? Halo? That's ridiculous. VAC plz.... DEVS??
-
Oh warzonee
-
Also makes sense
-
Still insane
-
-
Have to ask
-
PC players and their aim bot scripts
-
J a wizard. Lol guy could program his own wall hacks and aimbot
-
Console stats are way more impressive
-
I keep my gaming on the console so it is separate from my computer.... If I had games on my main system, i would never get much work done.... My fav pasttime (besides sex) is to drop in as a solo n hunt 6-man teams.... love listening to them panick as I take them down one by one 🙂
-
now back to work on BTNS 🙂
-
-
check dm ser :) -
I dont answer support DMs bro... way too busy
-
if you have an issue, take it up with the rarecoco project... if they confirm an issue, have them reach out to me and i'll take a look
-
but far to busy to look into ever "my token isnt showing an image" support DM
-
nothing personal, just not a good use of my time
-
got it, thank you :)
-
- 09 August 2023 (1 messages)
- 10 August 2023 (13 messages)
-
@jdogresorg do we have a spot for people to translate freewallet (if they are so inclined to) like there is for counterwallet here: https://explore.transifex.com/counterparty/Counterparty - Transifex
Join Counterparty organization in Transifex, and contribute to the world's largest localization community
-
added two more FAQ's to the Freewallet User Manual/FAQ
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
Still on my list of FAQ's to write:
I updated Freewallet and can only see my first 20 addresses! How can I get them back?
My second transaction on a MPMA send is not getting confirmed. What can I do?
How can I create a Dispenser on a separate address?
Help! I changed my asset description and now it does not show correctly on xchain!
I just sent a transaction but the link I was given says "Transaction not found on xchain"
Troubleshooting "Error while trying to broadcast send transaction"
^ just updating this with a full troubleshooting process
Other things to update:
Deeper explanation of Enhanced Asset Enhancement and how xchain shows this information
More explanation of how to use the Sign Message function to "sign" in to websites like pepe dot wtf and other uses. -
Had somethin weird happen.
I did a multisend to this addy 19HGsUoJD6XPzosgBsaCaxLa6iJcjjHQXr
Got the tx hash
84b304a7c4ee5ba3ed65a059d552bd97f55a3906b16d2a6de35495fd9ff6a32b
and it says it’s confirmed but has 0 refrence to the addy in the mem pool
I have no idea what happend but I definitely sent to that addy to. -
nevermind it got there but I don’t know how.
-
A newbie question ....
I have a stamp that I put in a dispenser (30 of 33 editions).
I wish to burn the stamp, because of a mistake in the code.
I burnt the 3 editions I had NOT dispensed (and where still in my wallet).
I closed the dispenser and the stamps are no longer accessible (cannot be burnt).
Is there a way of raccessing/etrieving/burning the remaining 30 editions ? -
solved - thanks @davesta
-
Greetings peeps,
Is it possible for a newly generated addy which has just been used to create an asset disappear from the list of addies?
This is just what's happening to me right now. -
I am not sure what you are expressing here
-
We minted an asset on a new address and the address disappeared
- 11 August 2023 (85 messages)
-
Try adding new addresses, maybe it will appear -
Okay, I will try that more but tried it once and brought up another new one.
-
can you describe the process of how you made this dispenser? or show how you did it?
-
I made no dispenser ser.
I only added a new normal addy then moved XCP in there and BTC to mint an asset. -
do you have the address? like the xchain link to to the address?
-
did you update freewallet during this process?
-
If you need to access it now, you can use a tool made by JPJA to export all keys with all addresses that were used by a single 12 word phrase:
-
GitHub - Jpja/XCP-Export-Segwit: Export addresses (legacy and segwit) with private keys
Export addresses (legacy and segwit) with private keys - Jpja/XCP-Export-Segwit
-
You should then be able to import that specific address again
-
but definitely interested on how it "disappeared"
-
Yes, I can get that. Apologies for the late response, I've been on transit.
-
No
-
That would be nice
-
Can you see the send on xchain? And on Blockchair?
-
Yes
-
Try this crypto ace the other reply was for pork chop
-
I will try it... hope my wallet will be safe?
Plus I might need your experience guiding me through. -
I've never used it. It's something recommended when trying to recover a Segwit address from counterwallet
-
Might try and find some other ways to figure it out and add more addresses before going that route if you aren't comfortable
-
I've never heard of this issue yet till you had it
-
Why am I being the first of things like these?😪
-
Btw, a davesta impostor just called me and sending me a link I can click in order to resolve this issue.
Immediately, I dropped off the call for I know he's a scammer.
Please be safu out there peeps. Demons are lurking. -
good being safe out there, just be patient and we can find a fix for whatever is happening to you
-
wow a davesta imposter. let me know his TG name and ill make sure people know
-
Congrats I think that means you've made it 😅
-
aryan said the same thing when someone tried to get me in scarce city
-
just annoying and sad people preying on someone in that way
-
Yeah it mosdef is... like they were born w/o a soul or something
-
the wheat shall be harvested and the weeds will....
-
-
its a bible quote btw, just wanted to seem poetic
-
graphic, lol
-
weeds are known to restrict the growing of wheat
-
I also got contacted yesterday after posting a question in this group.
First jdog phoned then davesta phoned (found it weird, so didn't pick up).
Davesta messaged me and tried to direct me to this site:
http://flacidomexp.com/
and get me to plot in my wallet seed phrase to interact with the site - so he could "help" me out.
Be careful out there - scammers are scammin' -
Immediately I dropped the call, he blocked me off so I don't see the traces of his call.
-
It is a small javascript. You can skim the code and verify it won't steal your keys. To be perfectly safe download it and run on an offline computer. -
Thank you!
-
thank you for this
-
let me know the TG handle's as they come
-
super annoying to hear that.... my TG is and always will be: "davesta" - nothing else
-
Lol they calling people now..🤦♂️
-
It's because calling is the only thing you cannot block without telegram premium
-
Updated the FAQ a lil more: https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/discussions/138#discussioncomment-6703754Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop · Discussion #138
It has been asked for and needed for some time now, so I present the - Draft 5 of the Freewallet FAQ I used Freewallet Desktop v0.9.23 to write this up with the help of the Counterparty Forums, Cou...
-
-
Got contacted by davesta, same pfp.
-
weird i cant see the TG handle in the screenshot
-
Can send screenshots of the communication if it helps ?!?
-
you can dm it, dont want people to get confused here in the Freewallet chat
-
No, can’t find it either !
-
WEIRD
-
when i click your name it shows like this:
-
just looking for the @ part
-
damn shame they are abusing my Steve like that (my pfp)
-
I know - it’s strange.
Also the person(s) must be monitoring this chat, since I got contacted just after posting the question. -
Just got charged $9 to change asset description. Second time this week, it wasn’t long asset json btw -
just updated the Pinned message with this:
-
-
hopefully this will help people verify that I will NEVER ask you for private information (ESPECIALLY 12 word phrases or private keys). The only time I will accept DM's is for specific PUBLIC TX's or PUBLIC addresses that relate to problems already publicly stated here that a user doesn't necessarily want to post in the chat, which I can respect and understand.
-
what do you mean by charged $9? are you talking about the BTC fees which none of us can affect or change? or did you register with Enhanced Asset Information using coindaddy.io ?
-
also asset name lengths have nothing to do with how much BTC fee it will cost (from my understanding)
FreeWallet Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 Aug 2023 (155)
- 02 Aug 2023 (117)
- 03 Aug 2023 (48)
- 05 Aug 2023 (16)
- 07 Aug 2023 (1)
- 08 Aug 2023 (87)
- 09 Aug 2023 (1)
- 10 Aug 2023 (13)
- 11 Aug 2023 (85)
- 12 Aug 2023 (20)
- 13 Aug 2023 (156)
- 15 Aug 2023 (14)
- 16 Aug 2023 (54)
- 17 Aug 2023 (16)
- 18 Aug 2023 (2)
- 19 Aug 2023 (6)
- 21 Aug 2023 (72)
- 22 Aug 2023 (15)
- 23 Aug 2023 (45)
- 24 Aug 2023 (17)
- 25 Aug 2023 (178)
- 26 Aug 2023 (65)
- 27 Aug 2023 (38)
- 28 Aug 2023 (13)
- 29 Aug 2023 (48)
- 30 Aug 2023 (11)
- 31 Aug 2023 (26)