- 11 August 2023 (85 messages)
-
if it does it is something I will have to research as I did not know this -
I was just changing asset description. Fees were low. I got a pop up saying it will cost 50c extra in fees so i clicked yes. Then $8 deducted from my balance. I am trying to see where it went. I never had this before this week. -
okay, so you are saying the information shown on the BTC fee in Freewallet did not match up to the fee on the BTC transaction?
-
Simon what version of Freewallet are you using?
-
Latest
-
okay, i know this might not be what you want to hear, but next time you update a description can you screen record the process and then link the tx info after?
When I had to advise Crypto Ace to do this process and fixed his issue here (though he was on a different version):
https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues/150multisend fee issue on v0.9.19 · Issue #150 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop@AdeKrypto mentioned as issue with Freewallet v0.9.19 automatically sending with a fee of 0.00001 BTC instead of the desired fee entered. In this case 0.00005 Video: cryptoace_compressed.mp4 Tx ID:...
-
since I have not heard this issue before from other uses I'll have to verify the "inputs" you put in Freewallet as well as the BTC transaction info for that specific transaction
-
Yeah will do. Just never had this happen in 7 yrs. Thanks for quick response btw 😎
-
its not that I dont believe you, its for educational and informative purposes to create an Issue topic for future users
-
thank you, doing so will help anybody in the future if they have the same issue
-
also updated my bio:
-
please always verify before trusting anyone in this space
-
Anchor issuer -
👀
-
Still on my list of FAQ's to write:
I updated Freewallet and can only see my first 20 addresses! How can I get them back?
My second transaction on a MPMA send is not getting confirmed. What can I do?
Help! I changed my asset description and now it does not show correctly on xchain!
I just sent a transaction but the link I was given says "Transaction not found on xchain"
How do I use the Reset feature?
Explain how to use Sweep feature in previous release -
gonna take a break for now will get back to drafting those later this weekend
-
- 12 August 2023 (20 messages)
-
Sorry if this has been said but, the dispenses tab has been rendered useless by ordipepe -
GM!
Is there a way to get details why broadcasting a signed trx?
I tried several times and still gives me the same error. -
this should have nothing to do with it
-
how so?
-
This is a very common error and can mean many things. please follow this FAQ to get it resolved: https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#error-while-trying-to-broadcast-transactionFreewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
what the hell are you talking about with Oracle Jason?
-
the Oracle in Freewallet is for fiat/btc conversion and doesnt "filter" anything
-
hey ppl, have a still this transaction been stucked :
https://blockstream.info/tx/39e77e997cdb8b7f1a61e9c31fbfbdfa8597a98824cc764369fe225e6b832271
what I can do to make it go faster ?Blockstream Block ExplorerBlockstream Explorer is an open source block explorer providing detailed blockchain data across Bitcoin, Testnet, and Liquid. Supports Tor and tracking-free.
-
try resolving it with this FAQ Alex: https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#help-i-used-too-small-of-a-fee-and-my-transaction-is-not-confirmingFreewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
thanks bro, will try
-
I tried this and as you suggested, it did re-appeared. -
-
davesta just called me again!😜
-
drastic times call for drastic measures
-
-
changed it
-
why does he gotta do my RealDogePunk Steve like that tho
-
good to hear
- 13 August 2023 (156 messages)
-
Joined. -
/p
-
Yo this is weird. So a make a send for my freewallet to another free wallet of assets and go to the mem pool and find the input is not my addy and output in the op return. No connection from my wallet to the other wallet -
Bitcoin Transaction: db2d171f04972b767cfd67f93a7d1d282bf7ea1511835db02cac7dd3df3244c7
Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with mempool.space
-
Strange. any input would be appreciated. TY
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
Just double checking you know YOU made the send and not someone else right? the send is for the correct amount and for the correct fee you set, right?
-
because it's common to have multiple UTXO's from an address complete an order if you have sent BTC to and fro from it often
-
But if you feel or verify your wallet is compromised you should use the sweep function. Which is disabled at the moment in the most recent version of Freewallet, but you can downgrade to 0.9.22 to use the sweep feature.
-
-
Welcome Binary good to have you here
-
Feel free to review and critique the documents in the pinned post. Would be happy to hear your input. FAQ is still a work in progress
-
Working on adding these topics soon
-
i finally just figured out how to update freewallet on linux
-
pretty sweet i can see the art big now
-
Anything to report? Sir?
-
-
-
Yes
&
Yes
This was the actual wallet to wallet on xchain but the mempool had no reference to any of that. It is the fee and send I made but that is no freewallet input. That is what made me wonder also it was just 1 UTXO to the op return which also confused me.
Here is the xchain info of the interaction.
https://xchain.io/tx/db2d171f04972b767cfd67f93a7d1d282bf7ea1511835db02cac7dd3df3244c7 -
It’s also about the 4th time I have noticed this in the past week or so
-
Do you have the Automatic Donation feature on?
-
I don’t believe so. I do the black box gammers.
-
let me check
-
No i do not
-
I think i turned them off wen i had the UTXO issue. To many in my wallet
-
I think I am seeing what you are referencing, just using a different block explorer:
-
Blockstream Block Explorer
Blockstream Explorer is an open source block explorer providing detailed blockchain data across Bitcoin, Testnet, and Liquid. Supports Tor and tracking-free.
-
by clicking the +Details bar and analyzing
-
with this address the one in question: https://blockstream.info/address/3NV72XAgLJc4dQ1DV7sypYz7J8NJMaR3xzBlockstream Block Explorer
Blockstream Explorer is an open source block explorer providing detailed blockchain data across Bitcoin, Testnet, and Liquid. Supports Tor and tracking-free.
-
thats the one
-
yeah I was using mempool. space
-
huh i always figured it was a UTXO thing, I have seen it on my tx's too
-
but a "3" address seems odd to me here
-
Thats how I feel. I have only seen a 3 Addy on Xverse wallet from stacks fir ordinals
-
It’s what there legacy addy starts with.
-
My Xverse Wallet. See what I mean. Strange.
-
From what I understood freewallet.io doesn't support 3xxxx addresses. TheStampWallet supports 3xxxx addresses
-
Xverse mostly used for Ordinals which requires utxos and careful of spending of sats supports 3xxxx address
-
Yeah I find it strange popping up in my transaction on the mem pool.
-
Yes I know where it comes from, that is the only place I have ever seen a 3xxx addy
-
Which makes me think its UTXO related but further explanation would be needed from a coding side of things... im sure it's been asked before somewhere back in the counterparty chat, it might not just be a Freewallet thing, but something with how unspent UTXO's and OP_Return works
-
-
Wonder what that Op return is
-
This your wallet?
-
Thats my question
-
Nope
-
A broadcast from your wallet?
-
Have no idea whos it is
-
Nope
-
So what is this TX related to?
-
because I can clearly see that address also has an OP_Return function scriptpubkey and both of those added up to the total amount set by you... correct?
-
-
The Ordinals Dispenser you are seeing on Xchain?
-
scroll up more data above
-
Yeah that is the fee I set
-
And it ended up going to the correct wallet but thats crazy
-
this amount though is the BTC fee you set?
-
nevermind im reading it wrong
-
-
thats ur fee
-
-
and this is info on the send
-
-
It makes no since
-
... which also happens to be your fee amount
-
The fee was set correct but you know how free wallet sets a seperat fee for multi sends I don’t see that
-
was it a multisend?
-
what op_return function did you do on the tx?
-
buy from a dispenser? mint a token? multisend?
-
Multi send
-
ah
-
Ahh
-
??
-
;b
-
sorry i reviewed the xchain tx info
-
i was staring too long at the btc tx info
-
I was making a trade couple cards for a couple cars so i did a muti send
-
i dont have an answer at the moment unfortunately...
-
But the 3xxx address isn't yours
-
All good. That actually makes me feel better
-
3xxx addys shouldnt even work with freewallet at this moment with 0.9.23 from i have reviewed
-
So that is your transaction
-
Yes my transaction
-
It's not a CounterParty issue. XcP supports
-
Oh my god
-
read
-
sorry i couldnt help more, I figure there is an answer
-
J just has to add the code for its support
-
yes
-
lol
-
?
-
Not you
-
ah i thought you came up with a solution
-
i was like READ WHAT
-
You had said this....
-
I am not trying to make a transaction with a 3xxx wallet. It poped up on my transaction out of know where
-
When using my freewallet
-
on the mempool
-
I did not use or send from that addy. I have no idea whos it is
-
Ya @jdogresorg should look into that if that's the case
-
That part 👆
-
You sent tokens, using multi send. And the TX on the mempool reflects an address that isn't yours.
-
Thanks mang I appreciate yer help fam.
-
Big facts
-
hope we can get it explained/solved ... looking through my multisends rn to see if something similar has happened to me on a past tx
-
I will also go through mine. I have seen it a couple times.
-
Like freewallet.io doesn't even use or support 3xxxx. So don't understand how it's broadcasting a transaction from freewallet.io using a 3xxxx
-
Will see what dev says
-
This is the original send in the xchain link. I took the tx hash and put it in mempool. space and thats the info it gave me.
https://xchain.io/tx/db2d171f04972b767cfd67f93a7d1d282bf7ea1511835db02cac7dd3df3244c7
https://mempool.space/tx/db2d171f04972b767cfd67f93a7d1d282bf7ea1511835db02cac7dd3df3244c7Bitcoin Transaction: db2d171f04972b767cfd67f93a7d1d282bf7ea1511835db02cac7dd3df3244c7Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with mempool.space
-
Lol ya just followed it
-
But bitcoin does so thats what is strange cause it was freewallet to freewallet multi send and out of knowwhere in the mempool that addy shows up.
-
Unless that's CounterParty back end has updates?
-
Like take hex and put in decode
-
Ya have a bunch of characters and says cnterparty
-
@jdogresorg will have an answer
-
I believe.
-
1DPgkNoXJAwurQwnjWJFyfeXVgqNu7N2nM
-
db2d171f04972b767cfd67f93a7d1d282bf7ea1511835db02cac7dd3df3244c7
-
But on mempool shows
-
-
J will see it when he gets up
-
And that is how it was written and so it shll be done.
Thanks fam. Appreciate you all -
https://mempool.space/tx/0dc17d68236080d120c0d14195e52752a759a853831bc72113485b2a9d6edc7a
https://mempool.space/tx/72614e5465599f7e3e2b11cafa99005b05723517eedd875a7adec1f28750638b
https://mempool.space/tx/3798d5a6d9c2bf283eb9a7f516a1b33c059a16d97a8295c1c52117cd20aedca5
https://mempool.space/tx/18f6a3e9f677986ed3bf069384f12fb83414e3776589431a3408dd7d1e6f2bc1
https://mempool.space/tx/e0c234574da840ffbb8f6b96bbd5473eaf7b236aa721e3bd639eeee49d23dcd0
https://mempool.space/tx/4e2544510bc9b3e093ebda002d09728ee3ae099d5486f383daddf32dcb9e9a72
https://mempool.space/tx/d843a22a70e6fd091ada05c1092446c58f9d6a135bc3df291c93a42c3fbc1f7bBitcoin Transaction: 0dc17d68236080d120c0d14195e52752a759a853831bc72113485b2a9d6edc7aExplore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with mempool.space
-
Thos are some of the samish sort of tx’s with the 3xxx
-
huh so we know its reoccuring, thats new info... i didnt see any on my recent tx's ... i must have checked 8 or 9 of mine
-
IDK. Maybe it’s just me.
-
lol
-
Multisends are cp encoded send data in txs…. The outputs are NOT send destinations…. Use CP and cp explorers to view CP txs….. not look at a cp tx in a non-cp compatible explorer.
Look into how multisends work…. Send data is encoded into 2 txs and the number of “3” outputs depends on the amount of data encoded in the send -
Thanks for the explanation. Much appreciated 🙏
-
Look at other mpma multisend txs on xchain👍🏻
-
-
Same tx on a btc explorer shows “3” addresses where data is encoded 👍🏻
-
Bitcoin Transaction: 1e30201ec6860edbc0ab8c9b60407e2955a7abe3341f2b634e6b002f9bd8b52c
Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with mempool.space
-
-
Thank you for the explanation. I'll have to add it to the FAQ.
-
Any word on the Transifex translation aspect of Freewallet? Something you are looking to include or should I just remove it from the FAQ?
-
@jdogresorg do we have a spot for people to translate freewallet (if they are so inclined to) like there is for counterwallet here: https://explore.transifex.com/counterparty/Counterparty - Transifex
Join Counterparty organization in Transifex, and contribute to the world's largest localization community
-
Eventually will dig into Transifex…. But it’s pretty low on the priority list… if it’s really important to ppl, freewallet is an open source wallet n I happily accept pull requests
-
-
Lol
-
-
-
Lol😜
-
It's more.... Should I leave it in the FAQ ... When there's not a spot for it? Or just remove it till someone comes up that's wants to do translation
-
Ahh remove till someone comes up…. Google translate prolly good enough for now👍🏻
-
Cool will do
-
-
Also check dms from me... I have a strange error I have never seen in Freewallet.. but it has some personal info (my address). Would love some feedback on it just in case it shows for other people
-
Thank you for the insight 👍
-
Figured it didn't have to do with wallet. And was related to CounterParty protocol TX...things I haven't read deep into
-
CounterParty protocol code is very interesting but also a brain challenge as the vocabulary is fairly new to me.
-
Got an answer. Gonna add it to the list:
-
Still on my list of FAQ's to write:
I updated Freewallet and can only see my first 20 addresses! How can I get them back?
My second transaction on a MPMA send is not getting confirmed. What can I do?
Help! I changed my asset description and now it does not show correctly on xchain!
I just sent a transaction but the link I was given says "Transaction not found on xchain"
How do I use the Reset feature?
Explain how to use Sweep feature in previous release
Explain multiple outputs more, especially with multisend
Add FAQ for addrindexrs error and link GitHub issue as it is known
Explain adding a hardware address and types supported -
Doing gods work
-
-
- 15 August 2023 (14 messages)
-
Joined. -
wasaaaa
-
is there a way to plug in to freewallet with Trezor yet?
-
Joined. -
Yup
-
Try adding an hardware wallet address n select trezor
-
Does it support other hardware wallets or just trezor?
-
There it is!
-
was looking for it in the login screen
-
👍will try it out
-
-
Dope
-
Joined. -
Joined. - 16 August 2023 (54 messages)
-
Joined. -
trying a multisend...anyone having issues?
-
doesnt wanna confirm. tried last night 2x also
-
paid extra
-
Bitcoin / Transaction / 54379d67bad00b05e38485380afeb2adc4ca530388c7ad69de5ad440809ce372
Check Bitcoin (BTC) transaction, value: 0.00000000 BTC, date: 2023-08-16
-
Eh…. Clearly not enough😜
-
ok oh. gmoney said that was plenty. ill do it with $10
-
post address for a https://xchain.io/asset/STREAMOFDANK for tech support
-
Mpma sends work but u gotta pay a higher tx fee than suggested…. Suggested fee is based on a single send…. Try 5-10x the suggested fee depending on size of send….. better fee estimation is something I’ll tackle in freewallet in the coming months…. Needs to be more accurate n based on actual size of tx not average…. But haven’t found time to work on it yet.
-
Bitcoin / Transaction / 11d105d3bb5b9a2ccce7c5c5b86a2b5333edc8f5dd7286e6acef1d4bf82e5fdf
Check Bitcoin (BTC) transaction, value: 0.00000000 BTC, date: 2023-08-16
-
1Av3EkYo8SkBhTnU2pDJppy6zQdvKeFA2u, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1JJP986hdU9Qy9b49rafM9FoXdbz1Mgbjo, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
14acvB2F7UXcGdYJjLyqgJ1Bc3UX249na3, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1MYfjFqURrkmYEE1UCZaeDN2P46Z6CK4GQ, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1EWjvmCUySoYSmoAvzoG7ejAFzHaVVigpy , STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
16AyUzWNQGAHsE7HMBgVKXC9KTe5qS3KX6, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
193J7RVEY2BgA5aKfL6BBAVSyiS1UyBRG6, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1AmJChMdxVVR67kqrbpUHu2huYEfU2Yqw4, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
14fDoUDKZ11REVuRxMSwKNvR36ToJ2UCM8, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
173cE6ScUFCmBLCqZeG18ij6r9KHRPbAjC, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
13XhZYidP7Pouvnqu7JCPwV9jw9jjEdTZp, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1DPgkNoXJAwurQwnjWJFyfeXVgqNu7N2nM, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
143FcThemCxW7AAsjmL1GYvYMe1ur1ZgJW, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1Mp47wKLV6qhG4ZED2UvHTYbVvnTswjge4, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1JmBiecLAKUZvEUd3nwgyrsjp4A4iwHJgg, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
bc1qtsuf4cadn30vksl3r2cnxge6rc2yjt6atqcfjx, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1P1azLNkECYAgpJRdA8jyWhwaQqD2gJ71e, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
bc1qpmp269pygy6ce2yl7m25nan4yx3qnqqgtvst9u, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1NoqqWeLXAnCGmP2ZDsuN8ekHJ61ZaE3JH, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
182JvXkH3cFDhEVxhBxaWnrMXRKDdBXRdg, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1CPSK72kzLCPzFrJvaq6kELvSZw9RwynPB, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1FZzA4kPgwvN3cCTEntiPgm2Jwq4U4Zrgt, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1FF6bD4f3KtWj5Gk8Whe5ywdHRzeTVTgUS, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1DoPkvMKUeEYV9YpG3BgCR9CZ43bTKgpFQ, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1C1VnAbR4LRvJNCiSS49HSXsHdzW94VeD3, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA
1JDogZS6tQcSxwfxhv6XKKjcyicYA4Feev, STREAMOFDANK, 1, PEPE.CO ∞ ALPHA -
Vip list
-
bumped suggested fee by 10x. confirmed but nothing seems to have sent. this is the largest multisend i have done so i could be def doing something wrong
-
Hrm… I’ll have Javier dig into it in the AM
-
i used ∞ maybe thats the problem?
-
Guessing maybe so… Javier will lmk
-
-
Too much alpha dankness in one send👍🏻
-
streaming rares and danks live 27 days straight
-
streamofdank
-
-
-
Damn how did I miss this -
If you have a hardware address also connected there have been reported issues with second multi-send not confirming. Which this issue is laid out here: https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues/152Multisend Issue with Not Signing Second TX - v0.9.23 · Issue #152 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Some users are experiencing an issue where a Multisend fails on the second Signing of Transaction in v0.9.23 These sends do not include subassets (if that matters) Some solutions I have seen that m...
-
but it sounds like the fee was the issue here, which I kinda laid out in "laymens" terms here which is why I really support showing the sat/vb fee with all UTXO's on the addy in mind for fee layouts. In my expierience it seems Freewallet doesnt necessarily differentiate between what the fee will NEED on a Multisend vs Token creation vs Sending all your btc to yourself etc etc... but I could be wrong but its just what I have found in my experimentation of fee's and freewallet
-
Fee issues, sat/vb, "high" setting and Freewallet not showing UTXO info · Issue #153 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
I have been reviewing the issues coming in for users on the Freewallet Telegram (https://t.me/freewallet_io) and I have noticed a big discrepancy between new users and knowledge of UTXO's, how ...
-
and the solutions right now is always "pay literally WAY to much to be safe"
-
Joined. -
-
Thanks dav💚
-
{"log":"\u001b[33m[2023-08-16 03:13:12][WARNING] Not storing [mpma] tx [11d105d3bb5b9a2ccce7c5c5b86a2b5333edc8f5dd7286e6acef1d4bf82e5fdf]: invalid: couldn't unpack; 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xe0 in position 0: invalid continuation byte\u001b[0m\n","stream":"stderr","time":"2023-08-16T03:13:12.875428935Z"}
-
i don't know which character is, i'll try to do a mpma on testnet with the infinite symbol
-
i did a mpma test with that symbol and got an error
-
then i removed it and it worked
-
soooooo, it's the symbol
-
@i3inary ^^ your MPMA send didn't work cuz of the infinity symbol
-
-
SO IT WAS THIS
-
-
-
-
since starting helping people here, it is kinda crazy how many variables there are to keep track of
-
now ill have to write the "Binary FAQ"
-
we shoulda thrown an error during the tx generation... so, Javier n I will be making some updates to make sure memos are valid and throw an error if not a valid memo
-
dont bring infinities into Freewallet
-
you can track the issue here https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib/issues/1248Special character on mpma memo is giving errors when parsing a tx · Issue #1248 · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib
When creating a mpma and inserting a memo with a special character like "∞", the txs won't get parsed because of an utf-8 decoding error. The tx 11d105d3bb5b9a2ccce7c5c5b86a2b5333edc8...
-
good to know thank you!
-
ive spent so much time on the freewallet issues github section i didnt realize how many were at the counterparty-lib
-
everything is making more sense when reading those too... lots of stuff i have missed to write about
-
-
-
added to FAQ:
I updated Freewallet and can only see my first 20 addresses! How can I get them back?
https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#i-updated-freewallet-and-can-only-see-my-first-20-addresses-how-can-i-get-them-back
My second transaction on an MPMA (Multi-send) is not getting confirmed and giving me an error. What can I do?
https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#my-second-transaction-on-an-mpma-multi-send-is-not-getting-confirmed-and-giving-me-an-error-what-can-i-do
I just sent a transaction and Freewallet gave me a link to the transaction but xchain says "Transaction not found on xchain"
https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#i-just-sent-a-transaction-and-freewallet-gave-me-a-link-to-the-transaction-but-xchain-says-transaction-not-found-on-xchain
Resetting Your Token Issuance:
https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#resetting-your-token-issuance
and added some more info for adding a Hardware Address in:
https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#viewing-creating-and-importing-addresses
Also explained Multisend extra "outputs" in this section:
https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#why-is-there-more-than-one-input-on-my-btc-transactionsFreewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
Still on my list of FAQ's to write:
Help! I changed my asset description and now it does not show correctly on xchain!
Explain how to use Sweep feature in previous release
Help! I used too small of a fee and am waiting for the transaction to be purged from the Bitcoin network - 17 August 2023 (16 messages)
-
Adding the option to place a transaction at a specific block · Issue #154 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
I have noticed users looking to use Counterparty functions at a specific Bitcoin block. Is this possible to do on Counterparty using this: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/NLockTime ? The use cases done ...
-
This would be cool
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
hello!
-
Welcome!
-
Let me know how your process goes on getting that low fee tx figured out
-
Is there a way to just cancel the TX, without doing a Chils Pays? What if I just want the pending tx to cancel out and use the btc in that address for another transaction instead?
-
because of the immutability of the underlying tech (Bitcoin) this isn't an option - unless someone wants to chime in with a fix... but I don't know of one
-
Wait long enough it gets dropped....
-
For me it had taken over 2 weeks. During the Ordianls craze. And it finally dropped.
-
Had to open new wallet so I can feed my Degen Behavior
-
Yea, I was trying to send a couple hundred bucks to an exchange to sell it, but I have since changed my mind and want to use those sats to issue new assets instead :-/
-
unfortunately you will just have to wait, or go buy some cheap btc (dumping rn) and refill the address to do so in a quick manner
-
dont forget you need XCP to mint too ❤️
-
Yea, that's what I wound up doing
- 18 August 2023 (2 messages)
-
I have sent multiple assets (stamps) to an addy via Freewallet - Multi Send.
One of the stamps is divisible (by mistake when created) and instead of sending 1 edition - 0,00000001 of the stamp was sent.
What is the best way of sending/resending it, so 1 full stamp is delivered ?
Can I just send 0,99999999 of the stamp and reciever will have a full stamp ? -
Correct, send 0.99999999
- 19 August 2023 (6 messages)
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
Hiya folks - long time freewallet user
-
Joined. -
Check the FAQ linked above in pinned and give us some feedback! I tried to include all of robotlovecoffee tutorials that are related etc etc. Still a work in progress
- 21 August 2023 (72 messages)
-
-
Sorry, I'm really behind. What's the tldr on what this is? Is it to do with stamps?
-
click the urls bro
-
Lol
-
Tokens on CounterParty
-
kinda..... a new kind of token... which CURRENTLY runs on counterparty, but can easily (and probably will) be moving to it's own platform
-
-
LOL... we doing science.. why not build in a RUG feature.... and a way to LOCK against it... make ppl DYOR a lil bit 🙂
-
-
force education on them 😛
-
Lol
-
im naming all my btns gmoney and activating full rug technology
-
no way to put money into these tokens yet.... give it another couple weeks... will get dispenser integrations working in BTNS... then you can create a BTNS tokend and throw it in a dispenser... just like on CP 🙂
-
-
There is the BTNS channel for anyone who wants to follow BTNS.... will keep this channel for freewallet chatter
-
Just make Jdog room. Umbrella Corp.
-
Just one place where we appreciate and complain LOL
-
lol... naww... I spread things out so I can holler at ppl about talking about the wrong things in the wrong channels 😛
-
got too damn many projects im involved in to have one general room 😛
-
-
😛
-
That's a fact.
-
I did, haha. Just trying to understand how it's different from regular counterparty. Seems to have all the same features.
-
got ya... its basic features are similar... but has some new features as well
-
ability to have an open/fair mint (anyone can mint, just like BRC, etc)
-
list functionality (ability to maintain lists of addresses, assets, tokens)
-
ability to do AML/KYC compliant tokens (tokens where only a select group of ppl / addresses are allowed/disallowed from holding the token)
-
also added some features taht CP disabled
-
callback feature
-
basically.... I think CP dev is way stagnant and moving ANYTHING forward through CP dev right now is damn near impossible
-
I want to keep experimenting with features and building.... but CP platform can't keep up... or doesn't want the imrovements or changes... or whatever
-
BTNS started out as a way to do a new token system on counterparty via broadcasts
-
it was born out of necessity... the src-20 guys were spamming non-usable numeric assets.... I wrote up the basic BTNS framework as a way to guide them as to how they COULD do tokens on CP if they wanted
-
they ignored BTNS and went their own route
-
so... I let BTNS sit on the shelf for a few months... now pushing it forward..
-
right now, think of it as an "testnet" for CP on mainnet.... just a way to experiment around with tokens and such on Bitcoin..
-
ppl been complaining about things on CP for a long time.... like rugspencers... but no one ever wants to make changes to try out solutions....
-
that is why I created BTNS... to keep experiementing with tokens and features... perhaps CP will eventually incorporate some of the features or "solutions" i use in BTNS into their platform...
-
FYI.. I respect the CP ledger in BTNS... so whoever owns BACON on CP also owns the rights to issue the BACON token on BTNS.... so, for right now, the BTNS namespace respects the CP namespace.... dont want ppl to see BTNS as a competitor... tho, could pretty easily open up the namespace and pivot BTNS to its own entirely new platform independent of CP.
-
Cool. I've been talking with someone about doing a registered offering for qualifieds. This would help with that.
-
BTNS assets also dont require the "shitcoin" xcp... which seems to be something that has held CP back apparently?!? 😛
-
Nice, this is a feature we need for the registered product, I was a bit disappointed to learn that it was taken out of counterparty
-
I loke the shitcoinaspext of it. It keeps the spam at bay if they need to pay something.
-
-
Any chance if getting royalties functionality?
-
there is a token which has an ALLOW list... where only the addresses on the list are allowed to hold the token... you can see failed sends where I am testing that pppl can't send / mint / issue tokens to addresses not on the allow list 🙂
-
*cringe*... yeah.. can add that.. tho prefer to add it in the Virtual Machine vs on a protocol level
-
via VM.... could just write smart contract that could enforce some additional logic on top of the hardcoded features..... so, your smart contract could do a check that verifies that some royalty payment has tkane place BEFORE it calls on the standard BTNS SEND() function, etc
-
same idea as the CP VM.... just a vm to overlay some logic on top of the existing hardcoded features
-
but... we also could do enforced royalties outside of the VM.... just would be messier and i'm not a fan
-
but... if someone wants to pay for the feature to be built/supported.. i'm all for it
-
Not yet, but I'm getting close
-
shouldn't be all that tough to build... just need to clarify exactly what type of royalty functionality you would like to see.. and then we can hammer out what options we add to ISSUE to enable a "royalty" token... where royalties can be enforced
-
feels icky enforcing royalties... but as long as it is something the token creator wants to do, I guess it is something they should have the right to do
-
I would want to to be an option during minting, like it was for the recall function.
-
Opt-in
-
Off by default
-
we could make it so it is off by default, but the asseet owner can enable/disable the royalty functionality at any time... as well as adjust the percentages, etc..... so many different options, I feel this is better done in a VM where the smart contract writer can come up with their own logic.. but like I said, possible on a base protocol level, just more work, and no matter what we build, someone gonna want it slightly different 😛
-
I would feel more comfortable if it was only possible on minting. That way you can't spring it on token holders after the fact.
-
If it was me, I would just add a royalties lock flag.... indicating that the royalties settings can't be edited anymore.... another DYOR feature, force ppl to check if token has royalties locked, etc.... same as we force them to check if supply is locked, if token is locked against callback and rug "attacks" 😛
-
this would allow also allow ppl to pre-register token names... and then adjust royalties info at some later date..... IMO we dont want a situation like we had in CP where ppl had to choose divisible or non-divisible and then were locked into that choice for years until we added a way to "reset" the token.... IMO, ppl should be able to register just a name.. and then be able to decide what to use the token for and what features they want at a later date when it comes closer to actually using the token
-
</end overshare> 😛
-
-
BTW... BTNS tokens support CIP25 JSON 🙂
-
-
Yea, that's reasonable. The only condition im concerned about is if you buy an unlocked token, and then years later it gets changed to royalties instead of no royalties.
-
What is the functionality of the "rug" feature? Does it just recall (steal) the token back, or is there more to it?
-
docs bro docs 😛
-
Broadcast-Token-Naming-System/docs/actions/RUG.md at master · jdogresorg/Broadcast-Token-Naming-System
Broadcast Token Naming System (BTNS) specs, docs, and tools - jdogresorg/Broadcast-Token-Naming-System
-
## Rules
- Mints token supply up to MAX_SUPPLY
- Locks MAX_SUPPLY via LOCK_SUPPLY
- Locks MAX_MINT via LOCK_MINT
- Cancels all future BTNS ACTION commands for token
- Transfers token ownership to burn address
- Destroys all TICK token supply (including tokens held in addresses) -
I just tried to think of the most destructive way to explode a token.... open to suggestions 🙂
-
its just a fun feature to play around with... some ppl do want their tokens to go kaboom randomly 😛
- 22 August 2023 (15 messages)
-
Joined. -
Joined. -
Hi there,
I sent my BTC from FREE WALLET three weeks ago and it still stuck.
So I use electrum to do CPFP, just press OK, no problem, right? -
21.1 sats/vb should cover both.... I am not as well versed with Electrum so I cant say for sure all the settings are right, but that fee is good (could be a little higher) but I would take a guess with the mempool at 8 sat/vb that it would work
-
The Mempool Open Source Project®
Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with The Mempool Open Source Project®. See the real-time status of your transactions, get network info, and more.
-
CPFP has to cover both tx's so I recommend running the fee really high to be sure
-
let me know how it works when it all gets confirmed!
-
I couldn't...
-
you have enough BTC in the address to cover the fees?
-
I would check that first... though I dont know Electrum errors...
-
Electrum boi's can you chime in?
-
I tried a few times and the screen switched.
Do I just press the OK button in this state? -
Joined. - 23 August 2023 (45 messages)
-
Joined. -
looks like it was already sent... did the CPFP work for ya?
-
I checked with Blockchair and it's still pending😢
-
-
Joined. -
I tried using Accelerators but BTC NITRO was not available, also Via BTC has too high Fee!
-
-
And I talked to Chat GPT about it.
-
-
Send a MAX balance to yourself with a $10-20 fee....depending how low your effective rate is
-
Mempool spike put you in the Que line. You can wait to clear. Wait for it to get dropped. Or try to bump
-
Joined. -
@davesta yh I have 21
-
You think that's why?
-
Releases · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Desktop wallet for Win/Mac/Linux which supports Bitcoin and Counterparty - jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
-
i don't know, you will have to test it out, this is the first i have heard of your 1st tx MPMA issue
-
but usually alot of problems get solved updating
-
Yh it stopped working a while ago, I left it for ages
-
-
i would reccomend v0.9.23 because it updated code for MPMA
-
I'm not using that version on that address
-
but you can try 0.9.22
-
I guess
-
okay well I can only offer help within my knowledge and if you are experiencing a problem check around the issues section first
-
and document it for future users if they have the same issue
-
many issues in the past have been solved by simply updating though
-
Thanks for help m8, I'm guessing most updated frw
-
and imo v0.9.23 is the most safe
-
Frw
-
-
you can always downgrade versions after too
-
Ahhh cool, yh
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
I'll give that ago, perhaps multisend isn't working for 0.9.21
-
always remember to back up the private key for any imported addresses when switching versions
-
as they will not automatically load
-
Is that if you switch versions, or brand new install, or both
-
all of the above, you should always back up (write down) your 12 word phrase along with any IMPORTED address as they are apart of a different 12 word phrase (any outside source private keys like hardware, emblem vault, extra adresses etc)
-
Freewallet is a deterministic wallet so it will only generate ADDED address from your original 12 word phrase
-
IMPORTED addresses are from different seeds
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
you can read about the differences here
-
Thanks for the heads up
-
And your help
- 24 August 2023 (17 messages)
-
All fixed, I updated and can now multisend, thanks
-
....yes friend. All your doing is creating a TX to send your balance to yourself. And the $10-20 fee is to compensate that Stuck Transaction
-
Miner should pick both TXs and confirm them, as they broadcast from same wallet address
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
Upper right of freewallet - "Change Address" - then "Options" - "Import Private Key"
-
try putting p2wpkh: prefix before private key when importing
-
ill add this to the FAQ
-
-
Wizard
-
🧙♂️
- 25 August 2023 (178 messages)
-
Joined. -
-
hey there guys - i just searched through the issues on github and can't find the right keywords that match my behaviour
- i'm finding many xcp/<token> pairs (mostly pepes) exist on counterwallet.io but within the exchange tab of freewallet
- this is forcing me to use the former to trade, which i'd rather not
- should i create an issue for this? -
sure - PEPERULES
-
-
-
also, if i wait long enough, my desktop client ALWAYS returns NaN of NaN for the collection
-
the fees on counterwallet.io have made this quite an expensive issue
-
you mean the 'add market' workflow?
-
-
Like this.
-
aaah
-
nothing happens, and as a bonus, despite removing the xcp/peperules tab i created earlier, it keeps reappearing
-
-
fyi - this worked months ago when i bought some cards then
-
my client was upgraded - in fact i reinstalled it completely last week
-
which leads to the question - what clients are ppl using to trade on xcp markets?
-
me too - except for my last 3 purchases
-
even search is messed up out of 252 markets, these are the ones that match 'peperules'?
-
-
ok, i'll go to github and try to write this up - it's probably something with my client config
-
It glitches
-
Opening and closing the wallet. Usually ends up working eventually
-
The Dispenser tabs and Exchange
-
i've been doing exactly that for years :) not working this time
-
Cool features when they work
-
😆
-
Server lag maybe...
-
you must use the UPPERCASE letters to view the exchange
-
the data "resetting" or showing the wrong data when you search just the asset and not the pair is a known issue
-
you typed in: xcp/peperules when you have to type in XCP/PEPERULES
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
by searching this way in the markets tabs you can literally see markets that don't have any order history at all:
-
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5
Freewallet FAQ 2023 v0.9.23 - Write Up - Draft #5. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
Joined. -
-
is it just me or does everyone's BTC balance on Freewallet mysteriously diminish
-
how so? is it showing your correct value on your public address on xchain/blockstream ? (counterparty explorers/ btc explorers)
-
aka, is it just a 'freewallet' loading type issue?
-
Ya I keep buying Rare Pepes and Danks.
-
Seem to be a glitch
-
When Rebate
-
Had $40 worth of btc last night, changed a description and locked a token, now today its showing $29 worth
-
The price if Bitcoin is going down
-
not that much
-
The "$" is variable
-
"$" value isn't always accurate. Most of the time it is
-
if the BTC value on block explorers isn't changed then its just the USD value that is shifting
-
Just enter your address in mempool.space and if there's no TX....your sat balance is unchanged...
-
I've been noticing it more and more as of recently
-
I am looking at your address on blockstream.info and I am seeing 3 recent tx's
-
used to be way more accurate
-
actually 4, but 3 recent... you dont have to post your address publicly here, but I do know it (your main issuing address) because we have traded before
FreeWallet Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 Aug 2023 (155)
- 02 Aug 2023 (117)
- 03 Aug 2023 (48)
- 05 Aug 2023 (16)
- 07 Aug 2023 (1)
- 08 Aug 2023 (87)
- 09 Aug 2023 (1)
- 10 Aug 2023 (13)
- 11 Aug 2023 (85)
- 12 Aug 2023 (20)
- 13 Aug 2023 (156)
- 15 Aug 2023 (14)
- 16 Aug 2023 (54)
- 17 Aug 2023 (16)
- 18 Aug 2023 (2)
- 19 Aug 2023 (6)
- 21 Aug 2023 (72)
- 22 Aug 2023 (15)
- 23 Aug 2023 (45)
- 24 Aug 2023 (17)
- 25 Aug 2023 (178)
- 26 Aug 2023 (65)
- 27 Aug 2023 (38)
- 28 Aug 2023 (13)
- 29 Aug 2023 (48)
- 30 Aug 2023 (11)
- 31 Aug 2023 (26)