- 20 August 2020 (19 messages)
-
-
MPMAs are comprised of 2 txs.... first tx is a pre-tx to set things up for the second tx... the first tx only pays 1000 satoshis... a low fee.... the second tx is supposed to use the fee specified in the MPMA interface... but apparently it is still forcing the tx to 1000 satoshis... I need to get in there and fix that in the next release
-
-
- 21 August 2020 (73 messages)
-
hrm... according to the code I am forcing a 1000 satoshi fee on the second tx (the actual MPMA send)... but in looking at your tx, your paying a MUCH higher tx fee than that.... so, perhaps Counterparty is using its default fee calculation... I'll have to dig into it a bit more
-
ideally it should use the fee you specify... but, if it is using the default fee calculation now, that is better than sending a tx with too low of a fee and having it timeout 🙂
-
anyway, i'll dig into in a bit
-
-
-
also I believe that MPMA sends don't work FROM segwit addresses at this time.... only from traditional addresses.... I belive John was having some issues with signing the txs
-
-
-
-
-
the size of the tx depends on a bunch of factors.. # of unique assets, # of unique addresses, etc.... but yes, you can save considerably on the costs by batching.
-
-
cips/cip-0010.md at master · CounterpartyXCP/cips
Counterparty Improvement Proposals. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/cips development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
There is the CIP if you want to get at the tech details of how it is so cheap... lookup tables 🙂
-
-
-
-
LOL... he is speaking directly to you Xcer... this is your burning bush moment.. listen! 😛
-
-
Boy he has a lot to say to you tonight! 😛
-
-
-
It may not be enough, but I sent it. Thank you as always.
-
That’s awesome of you! Thanks!
-
8ae86104e2741ab6a5d9aca787c7f359a2a57d4596c6e5c856ec40266b13cd2c
ea87d0e8e6ea773bfd386cd48c67533d4f3f6555e43ea6f3fc2233fea2f6cb85
I can not send the URL, so I put only transaction ID. -
Awesome! Thank you very much for the donation! 🙂
-
CIP22 is now fully funded and John will begin work on addrindexrs immediately 🙂
-
🥳
-
-
-
-
👍🏻
-
Counter wallet network stats, hmm....?
-
??? you have a specific question?
-
Is there ANY way to store (not neccesarily access) CounterParty tokens on a Trezor?
-
I just want to store the there and transfer out when I need to actually do stuff with them
-
now that was quick 😊
-
well done!!
-
-
-
THe last time we tried this was when Trezors were just released. We could see the tiny amount of BTC - was it 543 sats? but no tokens
-
just tried again with some shit-coins
-
A while ago I added some Trezor integration into freewallet... its been a while tho... so you should test that it is working to send/sign the send tx before you put any significant amount on the Trezor
-
-
Oh dont worry - low value shit coins only before the valuable funds go anywhere 😊
-
-
its a bit wonky.... it throws you to freewallet.io to use Trezor connect... then you select the addresses to import, and it imports them into freewallet
-
I'm using the desktop version on Ubuntu right now - should I switch to my phone?
-
nope... you should use desktop version
-
mobile hasn't been updated in a couple years... only supports sends, issuances, broadcasts... no dex, dispensers, etc
-
If you find that it isn't working, please LMK at https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues/19 and i'll look into it 🙂Hardware Wallet Support · Issue #19 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Look into adding support for the following hardware wallets : Trezor - https://gist.github.com/sorce/396fe44739392756abac8c2e213bb11e Ledger - https://github.com/mandelmonkey/ledger-cp KeepKey Open...
-
ah OK - found it 😊
-
Error getting public key _ might be an idea to disable MetaMask temporarily
-
-
web... you mean the mobile version that runs on the web? https://freewallet.io/mobile/
-
honestly... it is written in an older framework (Sencha Touch) and I'm not eager to update it..... would rather spend my time writing a new web-wallet which will work on mobile devices and desktops.... could avoid having to go through the apple app store and google play store... makes dev much easier 🙂
-
still getting an error Error getting public key... Please try again
I am using v09.11 Linux 64 bit -
I'm on Brave - should I get risky and try again on Chrome?
-
if you want... its been a while since I updated.. so prolly broken
-
I admire such honesty in a developer
-
-
And it would have all the features of the desktop like DEX and dispensers?
-
Yes... only issue would be using BTC on the DEX... would need to leave the browser window open... so BTC would prolly only work on desktop where the browser would stay active and able to check for order matches, send out BTCpay payments, etc
-
but, I could do like I do in freewallet... allow people to "lock" the wallet so no one can access funds or send anything without knowing password, while still having the wallet auto-sign BTCpay transactions in the background
-
could do a workaround tho
-
-
dm 😜
-
Tea, that sounds good. What would need to happen for that?
-
Just a matter of time and funding... working on a few different projects right now (non-crypto), so time is limited.
-
figured cause it doesn't work on my phone type
-
you've done an excellent job so far bro........really appreciate what you're doing
-
Thx 😀👍🏻
-
How much time and funding?
- 22 August 2020 (40 messages)
-
are these ghost/fake buy orders on the DEX?
-
lol unable to post image
-
-
Ghost/fake?
-
I tweaked ur permissions so u can post images/gifs/links now
-
Haven’t spent much time thinking about it yet... will try to write up a CIP when I get some spare time
-
We just released Limited Floppy Disk Hardware Wallets to some of our Series 2 blockchain trading cards. Available here: www.AgeofChains.com/shop
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
these buy orders on the DEX
-
Not ghost/fake... just regular orders.... I got some xcp off the DEX yesterday for BTC.... so it’s working fine
-
Ppl have to pay btc to list orders on the DEX,... so no fake orders
-
i mean the buy orders and sell orders are overlapping
-
and if you try to sell in to any of those buy orders, the order execution doesnt happen
-
Using BTC on the DEX is a bit different than every other asset on the DEX.... BTC can't be escrowed by the DEX... so you place a BTC buy order, someone places a sell order.. the 2 orders match, THEN the buyer has 20 blocks to send the BTC payment directly to the sellers address..... once the DEX detects the payment for the order match, then the actual trade excutes.
-
The overlap is due to ppl who placed orders to buy stuff using BTC..... their ordres matched with sellers, but they never sent the BTC (they need to be using freewallet.io with auto-BTCpay setup to automatically listen for order matches and send the BTC payment within 20 blocks).... so after 20 blocks, the order match expires, and the XCP becomes available again for someone else to purchase...... process goes on and on until the order matches with someone who actually pays
-
sec i'll get ya an example
-
-
There is a good example... someone placed an order to sell some XCP... people placed orders to buy XCP... order matches took place, but the buyers never sent the BTC... so you see the order matches expire
-
process repeats.... order match, wait for payment, free up XCP when order payment doesn't come.... rinse and repeat until the system matches with a buyer who actually DOES send the BTC payment for the order in the 20 block window
-
that is why you see 8 expired orders on the above link.... and 2 successfull/completed ones
-
using BTC on the DEX is a lil bit more complex than using any other asset on the DEX... which is why BTC wasn't used on the DEX for a number of years..... no easy way to use BTC on the DEX... counterwallet wouldn't make the BTCpay transactions
-
i see
-
That is why I wrote freewallet a couple years ago and added the Auto-BTCpay feature.... to make using BTC on the counterparty DEX just like traditional exchanges.... making it a "fire and forget" style thing... place your order, forget about it, come back to see your trade executed.... no wierd having to watch for order matches and send payments manually real quick, etc
-
it sure is confusing for new users
-
lol
-
eh... just gotta ask some questions.. or search on the counterpartytalk.org forums... lots of talk on the way the DEX works
-
but yeah.. using BTC on the dex is a lil confusing.... especially when you see wierd stuff like orderbook overlaps
-
-
market depth be like huh?
-
so this is what happens when I try to sell XCP onto the buy orders at the top huh
-
could be.... when you place an order, it either matches with someone and waits for BTC payment and then expires... or it just waits for a match and then expires.
-
so yeah.. could be ppl placing BTC buy orders without really understanding that they need to send a BTCpayment later.... unfortunately no real warning or anything on counterwallet when ppl place BTC orders
-
cool got it
-
-
Not in public
- 23 August 2020 (52 messages)
-
-
How would Counterparty be best described?
1) A smart contract platform on Bitcoin that's able to mint assets on the Bitcoin network
2) A cross chain dex able to swap Bitcoin to other Cryptocurrencies
? -
Correct me if I'm wrong please
-
-
1. Is more correct
-
nice. Been reading up on xprotectx.com and its cool
-
-
-
Not sure why a centralized exchange would trust there would be any guarantee someone passed KYC requirements just because they have some token in their wallet. Anyone can issue such tokens permission less on Counterparty. Did Bank of America approve this token? I doubt any centralized exchange would outsource their KYC process to an unknown untrusted third party. They have to comply with local legal requirements. I can issue a token right now in 5 minutes that claims I am ChaseKYC approved. Why would anyone believe me.
-
-
-
-
-
-
I don’t think they would or should trust any party. I think they would trust a reputable company like a BOA or Visa if they said their CP NFT proves that they have KYC for the address holder.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Yep. That's why protocol is the right word
-
If Bitcoin had scaled Counterparty would be highly valuable imo.
-
Bitcoin is still the same since 4 years ago, even Ethereum is the same lol
-
All the xcp on the DEX at or below current zaif price have been snatched up lately.... some ppl prolly looking to see if they can sell some xcp for a profit😀👍🏻
-
Personally I still think we could implement KYC support via white lists..... asset owner registers asset with kyc list option....client gives asset owner/central authority their bitcoin address.... bank/company/asset owner does traditional kyc on clients (lookup client info, verify nationality, make sure not on ofac list, etc)...... then central authority just broadcasts/maintains a list of addresses that are allowed to hold their asset.. and they deposit the asset for the client..... the platform then limits the sending/trading of the asset to only addresses on the asset owners list..... easy peasy kyc enforced at a protocol level..... assets can only be held/traded by approved customers.... easy for a company to verify to the gov that their token won’t get traded outside of the approved kyc customers
-
That being said.... what we have right now is working fine.... at some point if we hear that companies are specifically NOT using Counterparty because they can't limit their token to only KYC approved clients, then we can consider adding this feature...... maintaining lists is not really a great use of Counterparty.
-
-
if funds are a main issue, has the team considered raising funds from VC's or big funds. Cash is really abundant right now and literal scams are raising millions....
-
And what in return would you give these VC’s? You benefit from the protocol rise in value by owning XCP.
-
-
good question. equity or even a token swap with new tokenomics
-
Companies/startups that use the protocol can raise funds and donate to the development of CP
-
https://counterparty.io/docs/exchange_integration/ nope.... installing xcp isn’t hard... a bit of a large disk footprint at the moment using indexd.... but still easy for exchange to integrate if they want.....we don’t have exchange listings cuz it’s a pay to play game now..... we get offers to get listed on exchanges all the time but all want 1-10 BTC listing fees.... I’m not paying a listing fee and I dont think community should either.... funds better spent on improving the protocol..... if someone wanted to pay for a listing, go for it😀👍🏻
-
Shouldn't be paid
-
read posts below thiss
-
you cant sell into them
-
http://xchain.io/market/XCP/BTC check buy and sell order tabs
-
Yes, you can... dunno where your getting the idea that people are able to place fake/ghost orders on the DEX or that people are not able to buy with BTC... I explained to you yesterday how BTC on the DEX works, so not sure why your still saying stuff like "can't sell into them"
-
if an order is on the DEX, you can place a matching order.... the only thing that is questionable is if when your order matches with someone if they will send you the BTC, or if your order match will expire and wait for a match with someone else
-
yes but when people see a limit buy order they usually assume they can sell their XCP onto it and get BTC immediately, but thats not the case
-
i just didnt explain to him fully
-
Partial fills are possible... depends on if someone matches ur whole order or just part of it
-
Please scroll up and review the conversation I had yesterday on how BTC on the DEX works
-
I have explained why the orderbook overlaps at few times.... cuz people ahve placed orders to buy stuff with BTC, but are not actually sending the BTCpayment... so the order match expires.... explained it all yesterday complete with links to examples of orders with partial matches, links to orders with expired matches, etc
-
Using BTC on the DEX is a bit different than every other asset on the DEX.... BTC can't be escrowed by the DEX... so you place a BTC buy order, someone places a sell order.. the 2 orders match, THEN the buyer has 20 blocks to send the BTC payment directly to the sellers address..... once the DEX detects the payment for the order match, then the actual trade excutes.
-
The overlap is due to ppl who placed orders to buy stuff using BTC..... their ordres matched with sellers, but they never sent the BTC (they need to be using freewallet.io with auto-BTCpay setup to automatically listen for order matches and send the BTC payment within 20 blocks).... so after 20 blocks, the order match expires, and the XCP becomes available again for someone else to purchase...... process goes on and on until the order matches with someone who actually pays
-
sec i'll get ya an example
-
-
There is a good example... someone placed an order to sell some XCP... people placed orders to buy XCP... order matches took place, but the buyers never sent the BTC... so you see the order matches expire
-
process repeats.... order match, wait for payment, free up XCP when order payment doesn't come.... rinse and repeat until the system matches with a buyer who actually DOES send the BTC payment for the order in the 20 block window
-
that is why you see 8 expired orders on the above link.... and 2 successfull/completed ones
-
using BTC on the DEX is a lil bit more complex than using any other asset on the DEX... which is why BTC wasn't used on the DEX for a number of years..... no easy way to use BTC on the DEX... counterwallet wouldn't make the BTCpay transactions
- 24 August 2020 (14 messages)
-
That's exactly the case, I wish the orders would disappear after a certain time.
-
Orders do disappear after a certain amount of time... I believe the max is 8064 blocks... you set when the order expires when you place the order.
-
-
See that "Expires" box with 8064 in it... that is how many blocks the order expires in... so you can specify exactly how many blocks you want your order to be valid.... once the order expires, it is removed from the DEX orderbook
-
🙂👍
-
👍
-
client.start(bot_token='token')
-
What’s this?
-
When you say “The platform limits the sending/trading of the assets”, are you referring to CP as the platform?
-
Yes, referring to CP (counterparty-lib) as the platform.
-
CP should do this, adds a lot of upside
-
-
This is a potential feature in the future... so, how it would all work is not clearly defined yet... YES, it would be reading a list... how that list would best be broadcast/maintained is yet to be determined.
-
- 25 August 2020 (13 messages)
-
-
Some OTC scammer again. Looks like he deleted the message
-
-
So only freewallet Auto confirms BTC trades? U learn something new everyday 😂 Any BTC Order submitted using Counterparty if hypothetically matched, seller/buyer would need to be watching and actually manually complete the transaction??? Is that correct? If so that is horrible.... 🤦♂️ but all XCP tokens auto complete when matched👍🏼
-
That is correct.
-
Thanks for confirming 🙏 that is good info to know 👍🏼
-
XChain
Happy to announce some updates at https://t.co/kg6pp6YNN1 including over 4000 new asset icons, support for viewing NFT artwork directly in the blockchain explorer, and more!
-
-
-
-
Lol
-
-
Anyone wanting to sell XCP please post a sell order on the DEX or make a dispenser. Everyone should be very careful when people ask you to contact them by DM. This is a red flag - don't fall for scammers! Anyone posting announcements involving trades only available by DM will be booted from this chat.
- 26 August 2020 (158 messages)
-
-
-
Is there a freewallet io Dispenser tutorial?
-
No, there is not.... In the wallet itself I have a little questionnmark next to each field which describes that field and what data is expected.
-
-
General Dispensers guidelines
1.) setup dispensers at a new address (so any incoming BTC is clearly for the dispenser)
2.) Setup dispensers on traditional addresses (no segwit support currently)
3.) Only setup one dispenser per address (unless you want to vend multiple tokens at the same time) -
RGB vs existing alternatives comparison · Issue #11 · LNP-BP/FAQ
RGB compared to Liquid Confidential Assets: Works with Lightning Network Replaces Large Borromean signatures range proofs with modern Bulletproofs No blockchain space consumption! Universal smart c...
-
The "much higher privacy" seems not really good for tokens like NFTs
-
-
i think most ppl are mixing 2 or 3 concepts for tokens that aren't reconciliable
-
1) the security/share/equity/bond
2) the value-bearer token
3) the on-chain metadata-anchored token -
most "it doesn't have privacy" are on item 1
-
most "it doesn't has LN" are on 2
-
the rest (NFT, art, gaming, etc) are on 3
-
the thing with RGB is privacy by default, but you can still disclose the information if you want to
-
Seems interesting, but not for the n° 3) token that @chiguireitor described
-
RGB is a smart contract system, so it’s not just about tokens
-
i'm almost sure RGB got its uses
-
actually, this is also the case
-
i would argue that RGB is barking at the wrong tree touting privacy
-
but i'm deeply biased
-
What do you mean here?
-
Can be. It has changed a lot since 2019/2018.
-
privacy for art/nfts/game stuff isn't relevant imo
-
in fact
-
could be detrimental
-
again
-
i'm super-hugely-mega-hyper biased
-
Ok, I can stop the discussion now to save you from the hustle :)
-
lol
-
no don't worry
-
you're entitled to your opinion and your tought process
-
i would like to hear args about privacy on nfts/art/gaming in general
-
tbh i haven't heard a good enough argument about it in that respect
-
i get it about value representations and nº 1 in my item list
-
but most action on the xcp side of the fence is gaming and art
-
i concede though.... a "blockchain" for most of these purposes is kinda "bloated"
-
Imho same
-
i like what the rarible guys made about the tax for secondary sales of the assets..... i'm not super-excited about the implementation though
-
would be lovely to implement something like that in xcp...
-
-
I have also considered ways to implement kyc systematically. ultimately I don't want the burden of record-keeping, so I think a third party would be useful if not required.
I am against the rerouting of funds by the system (in this case) but I am in tune with the idea of exclusive tokens to comply with varoius legal requirements -
that's a feature loved by cryptoartist
-
-
😂
-
whitelists/blacklists can be implemented as an opt-in feature.... i think i could write up a CIP eventually for that
-
agreed on this. Privacy isn't a useful feature for art/nfts/games, could be misused by creators to scam people too
-
-
-
yup
-
again
-
it's an art/gaming thing
-
you want leaderboards
-
a "who's who" is needed
-
-
however.... selective privacy could be big in chance games
-
but that's an implementation detail
-
how do you see the usage in chance games?
-
i.e. knowing what the other player can play against you could be a leg up in some aspects
-
in TCGs getting 3-4 cards played from your counterpart could reduce the holders of a certain combination of cards greatly
-
i can think of ways to give a leg up in that scenario
-
but it's 1 scenario
-
and again, it's an implementation detail
-
-
why returns None?
-
not really
-
?
-
-
looking to buy 10-15k XCP, if you are selling lets setup on DEX or Dispenser.
-
I think this is a must have for SEC compliance of trading CP assets. Opens up a lot of new use cases that aren’t possible currently.
-
i concur
-
centrally controlled w/b-lists are a must for these use cases
-
-
-
so there are many dimensions to answering this.
1. As an issuer you can post the information about the tokens that you had issued. And every future owner of the token will be obliged to verify the info against the one you posted. So, basically, this gives you as an owner to validate the data before accepting it/stepping into the ownership.
2. For example if we take a painting worth 500k, I am sure that not everyone would want the whole world to know that he’s the owner. This is why RGB uses client-side validation and gives you a bearer right for every asset you own.
3. As for the gaming, 100% privacy might not be that needed, but you still need to prove the history only when it’s required and not make your skins visible to everyone by default. -
wel…not really. every further asset owner needs to prove the asset data against the Schema before they accept the transaction. Thus, if the data doesn’t match - you simply reject the transaction.
For sure, scammers might find their ways, but they would probably not be tech-related -
I’m not familiar with chance games tbh. can you please explain it like I’m 5?
-
TCGs in general have a lot of chance involved
-
deck shuffling
-
etc
-
If the creator makes 10 assets privately for one digital art, every owner can ignore that others exist if he wants this to stay private nope?
-
being father of 3 and having 2 additional teenagers at home from my gf's side, i can tell you skins/cosmetics are big to be shown to everyone
-
kiddos WANT everyone to know they have the most/better skins or items
-
it's basically their socialization ladder
-
Yeah, that's the point of it
-
then nothing stops them from revealing that info
-
yup
-
-
but it gets even better when everyone can see who's who
-
because collecting them becomes aspirational
-
well, you can tease people still
-
and the vicariousness of watching someone else's collection is really something
-
yup. every participant sees only one particular part of the history, but is still able to verify everything up to genesis block
-
i do enjoy showing off CryptoChainer's or HodlenCoinfeld's rarepepe collections
-
hehhehe 🙂
-
they have massive collections that no one else is even remotely near them
-
and that's also a way to show off the project's success
-
how so?
-
you can immediatly and statically gauge a project's success by the amount of collectors and their enagagement into collecting them
-
again
-
huge huge disclaimer
-
i'm very biased because that's one of my interests
-
showing off the success of rarepepe and rarepepe.party (when the game gets released) is a must
-
same for any other projects i deploy publicly
-
however.... i do see value in privacy....
-
but not for collectibles
-
-
-
-
that’s fair for any project/business/product etc, so you are right for sure
-
yup.... that's my bias 🤣
-
but indeed i've been watching rgb
-
seems interesting.... moreso the fact that it's deploying LN tokens
-
which is great
-
maybe. I’m not deeply familiar with collectibles use cases, so you definitely know more here 🙂
-
and there's indeed a lot of places an off-chain non-native token could be very useful
-
i.e. migrating pepecash to an offchain LN based solution would prove to be momentous
-
however, DEX functionality remains to be seen
-
my bias is that everything should be private by default though lol. not in the meanin of ‘hidden’, but in the meaning of ‘only I choose when and if to reveal anything about the thing'
-
-
you could theoretically have LN nodes that receive one asset on a side and emit one on the other side
-
oh nice!
-
dunno if it's implemented tho
-
thanks, yeah, shit ton of work though
-
been overworked this whole year
-
there is an effort to build that, yes. but at first the LN part should be finished
-
-
if LN nodes can translate between different tokens/coins, a DEX of sorts could be implemented
-
-
there's a feature though that needs to be defeated on LN swaps
-
mainly preventing the LN swap becoming an option
-
correct. there is also a watchtower-ish server called Bifrost that can potentially work as a routing node. but again, wip
-
can you elaborate more on this?
-
there's a paper (i lost track of it) where an "attack" was devised on border LN nodes
-
where you treat an LN node as an "option" (but a specific kind of option i don't recall the name off)
-
mainly, you use an LN node liquidity as a hedge against volatility
-
whose work is it? guys from Lightning Labs?
-
and keep old signed HTLCs just in case you need to execute the option at a previous price to rewind losses
-
aaagh can't remember tbh
-
gotta search it
-
it was a year or two ago
-
oh wow..hmm.. need to look at it indeed
-
i'll try to find it and forward it to you
-
was eye opening
-
Financial option, there was a temporal window extended.
-
was that the reason to extend the penalty window, right?
-
The person offering the channel has a time period where their counterparty can cancel the TX
-
Which means the counterparty can optionally cancel their channel if price fluctuations are high enough in their favor
-
thanks, that would be much appreciated!
-
yeah, this was the rationale
-
(btw olga, needmo is also on the privacy as default train)
-
-
-
Btw @dr_ukolova here's hodlecoinfeld's collection https://rare.estate/?btc=1AtcSh7uxenQ6AR5xqr6agAegWRUF5N4uh&
-
niiice!
-
so the website is some sort of a collection explorer?
-
Pepe owners’ explorer 🙂
-
- 27 August 2020 (19 messages)
-
Hey all just wondering where I might be directed to a rare pepe trading group, i am representing someone who holds a crazy collection and looking to sell
-
Could be interesting
-
-
-
🐸🖼 🏦 WTH Auction House 🏦🖼🐸
Live auctions of Rare Pepes, Dank Rares, Fake Rares, Wojak Way, Memorychain, Oasis Mining, and other Counterparty collectables. Boss: @RarePepeTrader. Please MAKE SURE user name is exact in DMs. News and Updates: @WTHAuctionHouseNews
-
-
Rare Pepe Party chat 🐸🐸
Ask devs about the game, share ideas and content. Way more verbose than the channel for announcements @RarePepeParty
-
^^ see above links
-
your friend may want to wait until the game comes out
-
Thanks for the links
-
-
You can use freeport.io to create an artwork NFT..... you also can use the format 'imgur/unique_image_code.jpg;artwork title' for the asset description...
-
-
Take a look at the above asset for an example... if you upload your image to imgur and use that style format... your image will display on xchain... or, just register your asset using freeport.io's interface 🙂
-
👍
-
xcp
-
-
-
Sir please sell me your bag
- 28 August 2020 (7 messages)
-
Not mine.
-
🤦♂️
-
-
-
Freewallet.io desktop wallet is working and you can use the DEX interface.... the mobile version of freewallet is older and doesn't support the DEX
-
Hello Paula Fiorita, welcome to Official Counterparty Chat, please write a message with the numbers and/or letters that appear in this image to verify that you are a human. If you don't solve the captcha in 5 mins, you will be automatically kicked out of the group.
-
1551
- 30 August 2020 (66 messages)
-
Nothing
-
VM
-
What does dispensers status : closed mean... for example..
Asset XYZ - escrowed 20 - give amount 20 - give remaining- 0 - price - status :closed ? -
closed == out of order / empty vending machine
-
Why is that? Fee too low when created or why might it be?
-
So basically asset is not for sale
-
Dispenser sold out, or owner unplugged the machine
-
Correct
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sweep works fine... however it requires a bit of XCP as an anti-spam fee
-
-
-
The old "sweep" method in counterwallet was just daisy-chaining tsends together.... the new sweep actually moves everything in a single tx.... thx to @chiguireitor for CIP20.. https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/cips/blob/master/cip-0020.mdcips/cip-0020.md at master · CounterpartyXCP/cips
Counterparty Improvement Proposals. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/cips development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
Very cool. Thanks for the clarification
-
👍
-
-
-
-
@ebonyissou keeping that attitude is a sure way to get kicked out
-
consider this your first warning
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
You can buy by using a dispenser. Has been explained many times before. This is a volunteer run open source community project. Aggressive demands will not get you far. I suggest you change your attitude and try a more friendly approach. Also please note it is a weekend, those of us answering do so on our free time.
-
-
-
-
Also you are not entitled to make derogatory statements about freewallet. Have you contributed to its development? The dev that made this wallet as well as xchain.io is giving this to the community for free now. Noone is getting paid to give tech support here. You can buy XCP on a dispenser like everyone else.
-
Error composing send transaction via API: Insufficient BTC at address bc1qklry233y3c3lcwghjykhr9ha9darfk5dd32tj7. (Need approximately 0.0102809 BTC.) To spend unconfirmed coins, use the flag --unconfirmed. (Unconfirmed coins cannot be spent from multi‐sig addresses.)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Error composing send transaction via API: Insufficient BTC at address bc1qklry233y3c3lcwghjykhr9ha9darfk5dd32tj7. (Need approximately 0.00579375 BTC.) To spend unconfirmed coins, use the flag --unconfirmed. (Unconfirmed coins cannot be spent from multi‐sig addresses.)
-
-
-
-
send bitcoin to your standard non-segwit wallet, buy xcp from a dispenser, transfer to your segwit wallet, sweep it
-
there
-
easy
-
when using freewallet try not to send all your balance.... maybe you have a polluted utxo set?
-
nope... it's not polluted
-
-
Error composing send transaction via API: Insufficient BTC at address bc1qklry233y3c3lcwghjykhr9ha9darfk5dd32tj7. (Need approximately 0.00205375 BTC.) To spend unconfirmed coins, use the flag --unconfirmed. (Unconfirmed coins cannot be spent from multi‐sig addresses.)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
THe error says you need more BTC... so the solution is.... you guessed it.. you need more BTC
-
-
-
-
- 31 August 2020 (5 messages)
-
-
Ahhh, ok so if you disconnect from Freewallet, then dispenser goes out- essentially you pull plug 🔌 on vending machine ?
-
nope
-
dispensers have exactly that feature, that they don't need interactive operation
-
No... Freewallet is only used to setup the dispenser... once a dispenser is open, you can closer freewallet.... the dispenser stays open and keeps giving out tokens until either a.) the vending machine runs out of tokens... or b.) The operator closes the dispenser ( a separate 'cancel/close' transaction)