Official Counterparty Chat

Official Counterparty Chat

Public archive of Telegram messages.

  • 2025

    • May 2025 (237)
    • Apr 2025 (83)
    • Mar 2025 (132)
    • Feb 2025 (203)
    • Jan 2025 (333)
  • 2024

    • Dec 2024 (749)
    • Nov 2024 (3574)
    • Oct 2024 (6142)
    • Sep 2024 (566)
    • Aug 2024 (651)
    • Jul 2024 (606)
    • Jun 2024 (808)
    • May 2024 (2774)
    • Apr 2024 (1312)
    • Mar 2024 (1507)
    • Feb 2024 (1942)
    • Jan 2024 (8279)
  • 2023

    • Dec 2023 (1705)
    • Nov 2023 (839)
    • Oct 2023 (882)
    • Sep 2023 (718)
    • Aug 2023 (1098)
    • Jul 2023 (856)
    • Jun 2023 (1761)
    • May 2023 (4323)
    • Apr 2023 (966)
    • Mar 2023 (900)
    • Feb 2023 (1278)
    • Jan 2023 (1230)
  • 2022

    • Dec 2022 (997)
    • Nov 2022 (1855)
    • Oct 2022 (1529)
    • Sep 2022 (2138)
    • Aug 2022 (1499)
    • Jul 2022 (2231)
    • Jun 2022 (817)
    • May 2022 (1067)
    • Apr 2022 (1402)
    • Mar 2022 (1998)
    • Feb 2022 (2064)
    • Jan 2022 (1985)
  • 2021

    • Dec 2021 (1357)
    • Nov 2021 (1990)
    • Oct 2021 (1761)
    • Sep 2021 (3183)
    • Aug 2021 (1549)
    • Jul 2021 (651)
    • Jun 2021 (903)
    • May 2021 (773)
    • Apr 2021 (1381)
    • Mar 2021 (2909)
    • Feb 2021 (1776)
    • Jan 2021 (1099)
  • 2020

    • Dec 2020 (681)
    • Nov 2020 (620)
    • Oct 2020 (412)
    • Sep 2020 (543)
    • Aug 2020 (951)
    • Jul 2020 (207)
    • Jun 2020 (121)
    • May 2020 (302)
    • Apr 2020 (178)
    • Mar 2020 (191)
    • Feb 2020 (522)
    • Jan 2020 (208)
  • 2019

    • Dec 2019 (107)
    • Nov 2019 (791)
    • Oct 2019 (574)
    • Sep 2019 (362)
    • Aug 2019 (383)
    • Jul 2019 (1852)
    • Jun 2019 (1605)
    • May 2019 (697)
    • Apr 2019 (203)
    • Mar 2019 (182)
    • Feb 2019 (221)
    • Jan 2019 (157)
  • 2018

    • Dec 2018 (152)
    • Nov 2018 (167)
    • Oct 2018 (344)
    • Sep 2018 (310)
    • Aug 2018 (480)
    • Jul 2018 (386)
    • Jun 2018 (267)
    • May 2018 (584)
    • Apr 2018 (581)
    • Mar 2018 (1277)
    • Feb 2018 (1610)
    • Jan 2018 (5725)
  • 2017

    • Dec 2017 (2655)
    • Nov 2017 (1569)
    • Oct 2017 (1610)
    • Sep 2017 (1894)
    • Aug 2017 (1216)
    • Jul 2017 (1758)
    • Jun 2017 (2)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 20 August 2020 (19 messages)
  • @XCERXCP #54648 11:56 PM, 20 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-20_23-56-40.jpg
  • @jdogresorg #54649 11:58 PM, 20 Aug 2020
    MPMAs are comprised of 2 txs.... first tx is a pre-tx to set things up for the second tx... the first tx only pays 1000 satoshis... a low fee.... the second tx is supposed to use the fee specified in the MPMA interface... but apparently it is still forcing the tx to 1000 satoshis... I need to get in there and fix that in the next release
  • @XCERXCP #54650 11:58 PM, 20 Aug 2020
    I’m going to do some write ups on this and dispensers so I just want to make sure I know what I’m talking about.
  • @XCERXCP #54651 11:59 PM, 20 Aug 2020
    Ok gotcha thanks
  • 21 August 2020 (73 messages)
  • @jdogresorg #54652 12:05 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    hrm... according to the code I am forcing a 1000 satoshi fee on the second tx (the actual MPMA send)... but in looking at your tx, your paying a MUCH higher tx fee than that.... so, perhaps Counterparty is using its default fee calculation... I'll have to dig into it a bit more
  • @jdogresorg #54653 12:06 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    ideally it should use the fee you specify... but, if it is using the default fee calculation now, that is better than sending a tx with too low of a fee and having it timeout 🙂
  • @jdogresorg #54654 12:06 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    anyway, i'll dig into in a bit
  • @XCERXCP #54655 12:08 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    Ok gotcha one more question
  • @XCERXCP #54656 12:08 AM, 21 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-21_00-08-28.jpg
  • @jdogresorg #54657 12:08 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    also I believe that MPMA sends don't work FROM segwit addresses at this time.... only from traditional addresses.... I belive John was having some issues with signing the txs
  • @XCERXCP #54658 12:09 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    That’s the 54 address send above, size 2340 vB
  • @XCERXCP #54659 12:09 AM, 21 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-21_00-09-23.jpg
  • @XCERXCP #54660 12:09 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    That’s a single send, 249 vB
  • @XCERXCP #54661 12:10 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    So I sent 54x but the size only increased 10x vs a single send?
  • @jdogresorg #54662 12:11 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    the size of the tx depends on a bunch of factors.. # of unique assets, # of unique addresses, etc.... but yes, you can save considerably on the costs by batching.
  • @XCERXCP #54663 12:12 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    Wow, that’s like 80% savings by sending multi vs single
  • @jdogresorg #54664 12:12 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/cips/blob/master/cip-0010.md
    cips/cip-0010.md at master · CounterpartyXCP/cips

    Counterparty Improvement Proposals. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/cips development by creating an account on GitHub.

  • @jdogresorg #54665 12:13 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    There is the CIP if you want to get at the tech details of how it is so cheap... lookup tables 🙂
  • @XCERXCP #54666 12:13 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    Thank you will do
  • @XCERXCP #54667 12:14 AM, 21 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-21_00-14-07.jpg
  • @XCERXCP #54668 12:14 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    Who is god?
  • @jdogresorg #54669 12:16 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    LOL... he is speaking directly to you Xcer... this is your burning bush moment.. listen! 😛
  • @XCERXCP #54670 12:16 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    Lmao 😂 I’m listening
  • @jdogresorg #54671 12:18 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    Boy he has a lot to say to you tonight! 😛
  • @jdogresorg #54672 12:19 AM, 21 Aug 2020

    mp4.mp4

  • @Superart #54673 12:37 AM, 21 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-21_00-37-09.jpg
  • @WakiyamaP #54680 02:18 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    It may not be enough, but I sent it. Thank you as always.
  • @XCERXCP ↶ Reply to #54680 #54681 02:21 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    That’s awesome of you! Thanks!
  • @WakiyamaP #54682 02:31 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    8ae86104e2741ab6a5d9aca787c7f359a2a57d4596c6e5c856ec40266b13cd2c
    ea87d0e8e6ea773bfd386cd48c67533d4f3f6555e43ea6f3fc2233fea2f6cb85
    I can not send the URL, so I put only transaction ID.
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #54682 #54687 04:00 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    Awesome! Thank you very much for the donation! 🙂
  • @jdogresorg #54688 04:06 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    CIP22 is now fully funded and John will begin work on addrindexrs immediately 🙂
  • @104473096 #54689 04:07 AM, 21 Aug 2020
    🥳
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #54680 #54690 04:08 AM, 21 Aug 2020

    video2.mp4

  • @Nickst2 #54692 04:13 AM, 21 Aug 2020

    animation.gif.mp4

  • @XCERXCP #54710 12:31 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    Wow, unreal, great day for CP! Thank you!
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #54682 #54711 12:52 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    👍🏻
  • @524284385 #54712 03:22 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    Counter wallet network stats, hmm....?
  • @jdogresorg #54714 04:28 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    ??? you have a specific question?
  • @Scotcoin_Willie #54715 06:24 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    Is there ANY way to store (not neccesarily access) CounterParty tokens on a Trezor?
  • @Scotcoin_Willie #54716 06:25 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    I just want to store the there and transfer out when I need to actually do stuff with them
  • @Scotcoin_Willie #54718 06:30 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    now that was quick 😊
  • @Scotcoin_Willie #54719 06:30 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    well done!!
  • @Superart #54720 06:45 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    It should just work. Counterparty transactions are just Bitcoin transactions.
  • @Superart #54721 06:46 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    What happens if you send a token to an address that's stored on your trezor?
  • @Scotcoin_Willie #54722 06:53 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    THe last time we tried this was when Trezors were just released. We could see the tiny amount of BTC - was it 543 sats? but no tokens
  • @Scotcoin_Willie #54723 06:56 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    just tried again with some shit-coins
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #54715 #54724 06:58 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    A while ago I added some Trezor integration into freewallet... its been a while tho... so you should test that it is working to send/sign the send tx before you put any significant amount on the Trezor
  • @jdogresorg #54725 06:58 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    https://i.gyazo.com/37c6f4d1dfda65c6fe9c8c66fcf2d0a7.png
    None
  • @Scotcoin_Willie #54726 06:59 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    Oh dont worry - low value shit coins only before the valuable funds go anywhere 😊
  • @jdogresorg #54727 06:59 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    https://i.gyazo.com/adff6219b3f8a09110fe260a5ffbba36.png
    None
  • @jdogresorg #54728 07:00 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    its a bit wonky.... it throws you to freewallet.io to use Trezor connect... then you select the addresses to import, and it imports them into freewallet
  • @Scotcoin_Willie #54729 07:00 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    I'm using the desktop version on Ubuntu right now - should I switch to my phone?
  • @jdogresorg #54730 07:00 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    nope... you should use desktop version
  • @jdogresorg #54731 07:00 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    mobile hasn't been updated in a couple years... only supports sends, issuances, broadcasts... no dex, dispensers, etc
  • @jdogresorg #54732 07:01 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    If you find that it isn't working, please LMK at https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop/issues/19 and i'll look into it 🙂
    Hardware Wallet Support · Issue #19 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop

    Look into adding support for the following hardware wallets : Trezor - https://gist.github.com/sorce/396fe44739392756abac8c2e213bb11e Ledger - https://github.com/mandelmonkey/ledger-cp KeepKey Open...

  • @Scotcoin_Willie #54733 07:01 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    ah OK - found it 😊
  • @Scotcoin_Willie #54734 07:06 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    Error getting public key _ might be an idea to disable MetaMask temporarily
  • @Superart #54735 07:07 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    What would it take to bring the web freewallet.io up to date?
  • @jdogresorg #54736 07:08 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    web... you mean the mobile version that runs on the web? https://freewallet.io/mobile/
  • @jdogresorg #54737 07:19 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    honestly... it is written in an older framework (Sencha Touch) and I'm not eager to update it..... would rather spend my time writing a new web-wallet which will work on mobile devices and desktops.... could avoid having to go through the apple app store and google play store... makes dev much easier 🙂
  • @Scotcoin_Willie #54738 07:23 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    still getting an error Error getting public key... Please try again
    I am using v09.11 Linux 64 bit
  • @Scotcoin_Willie #54739 07:23 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    I'm on Brave - should I get risky and try again on Chrome?
  • @jdogresorg #54740 07:24 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    if you want... its been a while since I updated.. so prolly broken
  • @Scotcoin_Willie #54741 07:25 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    I admire such honesty in a developer
  • @jdogresorg #54742 07:26 PM, 21 Aug 2020

    giphy (2).mp4

  • @Superart ↶ Reply to #54737 #54743 08:01 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    And it would have all the features of the desktop like DEX and dispensers?
  • @jdogresorg #54744 08:02 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    Yes... only issue would be using BTC on the DEX... would need to leave the browser window open... so BTC would prolly only work on desktop where the browser would stay active and able to check for order matches, send out BTCpay payments, etc
  • @jdogresorg #54745 08:03 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    but, I could do like I do in freewallet... allow people to "lock" the wallet so no one can access funds or send anything without knowing password, while still having the wallet auto-sign BTCpay transactions in the background
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #54744 #54746 08:05 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    could do a workaround tho
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #54746 #54747 08:05 PM, 21 Aug 2020

    mp4.mp4

  • @104473096 #54748 08:06 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    dm 😜
  • @Superart ↶ Reply to #54745 #54749 08:09 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    Tea, that sounds good. What would need to happen for that?
  • @jdogresorg #54750 08:16 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    Just a matter of time and funding... working on a few different projects right now (non-crypto), so time is limited.
  • @h4xor_f0r_Lif3 ↶ Reply to #54731 #54754 09:05 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    figured cause it doesn't work on my phone type
  • @h4xor_f0r_Lif3 ↶ Reply to #54750 #54755 09:07 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    you've done an excellent job so far bro........really appreciate what you're doing
  • @jdogresorg #54756 09:09 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    Thx 😀👍🏻
  • @Superart ↶ Reply to #54750 #54757 09:21 PM, 21 Aug 2020
    How much time and funding?
  • 22 August 2020 (40 messages)
  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54787 02:09 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    are these ghost/fake buy orders on the DEX?
  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54788 02:09 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    lol unable to post image
  • @XCERXCP #54793 02:41 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    CIP23? What’s next?
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #54787 #54804 05:51 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    Ghost/fake?
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #54788 #54805 05:53 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    I tweaked ur permissions so u can post images/gifs/links now
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #54757 #54806 05:54 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    Haven’t spent much time thinking about it yet... will try to write up a CIP when I get some spare time
  • @manksi #54807 08:08 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    We just released Limited Floppy Disk Hardware Wallets to some of our Series 2 blockchain trading cards. Available here: www.AgeofChains.com/shop
  • @manksi #54808 08:08 PM, 22 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-22_20-08-36.jpg
  • @manksi #54809 08:08 PM, 22 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-22_20-08-37.jpg
  • @manksi #54810 08:08 PM, 22 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-22_20-08-37.jpg
  • @manksi #54811 08:08 PM, 22 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-22_20-08-38.jpg
  • @manksi #54812 08:08 PM, 22 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-22_20-08-38.jpg
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #54804 #54820 09:21 PM, 22 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-22_21-21-17.jpg
  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54821 09:21 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    these buy orders on the DEX
  • @jdogresorg #54822 10:04 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    Not ghost/fake... just regular orders.... I got some xcp off the DEX yesterday for BTC.... so it’s working fine
  • @jdogresorg #54823 10:05 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    Ppl have to pay btc to list orders on the DEX,... so no fake orders
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #54823 #54827 11:22 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    i mean the buy orders and sell orders are overlapping
  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54828 11:22 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    and if you try to sell in to any of those buy orders, the order execution doesnt happen
  • @jdogresorg #54829 11:25 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    Using BTC on the DEX is a bit different than every other asset on the DEX.... BTC can't be escrowed by the DEX... so you place a BTC buy order, someone places a sell order.. the 2 orders match, THEN the buyer has 20 blocks to send the BTC payment directly to the sellers address..... once the DEX detects the payment for the order match, then the actual trade excutes.
  • @jdogresorg #54830 11:26 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    The overlap is due to ppl who placed orders to buy stuff using BTC..... their ordres matched with sellers, but they never sent the BTC (they need to be using freewallet.io with auto-BTCpay setup to automatically listen for order matches and send the BTC payment within 20 blocks).... so after 20 blocks, the order match expires, and the XCP becomes available again for someone else to purchase...... process goes on and on until the order matches with someone who actually pays
  • @jdogresorg #54831 11:26 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    sec i'll get ya an example
  • @jdogresorg #54832 11:27 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    http://xchain.io/tx/1525682
  • @jdogresorg #54833 11:28 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    There is a good example... someone placed an order to sell some XCP... people placed orders to buy XCP... order matches took place, but the buyers never sent the BTC... so you see the order matches expire
  • @jdogresorg #54834 11:28 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    process repeats.... order match, wait for payment, free up XCP when order payment doesn't come.... rinse and repeat until the system matches with a buyer who actually DOES send the BTC payment for the order in the 20 block window
  • @jdogresorg #54835 11:28 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    that is why you see 8 expired orders on the above link.... and 2 successfull/completed ones
  • @jdogresorg #54836 11:29 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    using BTC on the DEX is a lil bit more complex than using any other asset on the DEX... which is why BTC wasn't used on the DEX for a number of years..... no easy way to use BTC on the DEX... counterwallet wouldn't make the BTCpay transactions
  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54837 11:30 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    i see
  • @jdogresorg #54838 11:30 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    That is why I wrote freewallet a couple years ago and added the Auto-BTCpay feature.... to make using BTC on the counterparty DEX just like traditional exchanges.... making it a "fire and forget" style thing... place your order, forget about it, come back to see your trade executed.... no wierd having to watch for order matches and send payments manually real quick, etc
  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54839 11:30 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    it sure is confusing for new users
  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54840 11:30 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    lol
  • @jdogresorg #54841 11:31 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    eh... just gotta ask some questions.. or search on the counterpartytalk.org forums... lots of talk on the way the DEX works
  • @jdogresorg #54842 11:31 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    but yeah.. using BTC on the dex is a lil confusing.... especially when you see wierd stuff like orderbook overlaps
  • @jdogresorg #54843 11:31 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    https://i.gyazo.com/77ec529d37ba471f8a413d2299bcc75c.png
    None
  • @jdogresorg #54844 11:32 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    market depth be like huh?
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #54833 #54845 11:32 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    so this is what happens when I try to sell XCP onto the buy orders at the top huh
  • @jdogresorg #54846 11:33 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    could be.... when you place an order, it either matches with someone and waits for BTC payment and then expires... or it just waits for a match and then expires.
  • @jdogresorg #54847 11:33 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    so yeah.. could be ppl placing BTC buy orders without really understanding that they need to send a BTCpayment later.... unfortunately no real warning or anything on counterwallet when ppl place BTC orders
  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54848 11:34 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    cool got it
  • @jdogresorg #54849 11:35 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    sticker (7).webp
  • @1270230705 #54853 11:56 PM, 22 Aug 2020
    Not in public
  • 23 August 2020 (52 messages)
  • @heunland #54856 01:10 AM, 23 Aug 2020
    Please use a dispenser or the DEX 🤷‍♀️
  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54860 01:57 AM, 23 Aug 2020
    How would Counterparty be best described?
    1) A smart contract platform on Bitcoin that's able to mint assets on the Bitcoin network
    2) A cross chain dex able to swap Bitcoin to other Cryptocurrencies

    ?
  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54861 01:57 AM, 23 Aug 2020
    Correct me if I'm wrong please
  • @heunland #54862 01:57 AM, 23 Aug 2020
    Okay
  • @heunland ↶ Reply to #54860 #54885 12:00 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    1. Is more correct
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #54885 #54886 12:09 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    nice. Been reading up on xprotectx.com and its cool
  • @ffmad #54887 12:16 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    A protocol directly based on Bitcoin to create and share assets?
  • @ffmad #54888 12:17 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    I don't like the term of platform, it sounds like "layer 2" but XCP is still "layer 1.x" I would say
  • @heunland #54889 12:18 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    Not sure why a centralized exchange would trust there would be any guarantee someone passed KYC requirements just because they have some token in their wallet. Anyone can issue such tokens permission less on Counterparty. Did Bank of America approve this token? I doubt any centralized exchange would outsource their KYC process to an unknown untrusted third party. They have to comply with local legal requirements. I can issue a token right now in 5 minutes that claims I am ChaseKYC approved. Why would anyone believe me.
  • @ffmad #54890 12:18 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    I often see people mistaking XCP for a sidechain
  • @heunland #54891 12:19 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    It's not a sidechain. It just uses OP_Return messages to encode what tokens you are transferring in a BTC TX
  • @heunland #54892 12:20 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    I do call it a protocol on top of Bitcoin
  • @heunland #54893 12:21 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    It is a lot easier than issuing an ERC20 token on ethereum
  • @heunland #54894 12:23 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    I don't think most of the tokens on ethereum actually use any of the smart contract capabilities beyond what you could do with a simple counterparty token. People were issuing NFTs on Counterparty before they became fashion on ethereum too
  • @XCERXCP ↶ Reply to #54889 #54895 12:50 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    I don’t think they would or should trust any party. I think they would trust a reputable company like a BOA or Visa if they said their CP NFT proves that they have KYC for the address holder.
  • @heunland #54896 12:53 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    How do you get BoA and Visa to put their stamp of approval on this. Who verifies that this third party did the KYC and why would customers want to send this third party that is not their bank their private info in the first place
  • @XCERXCP #54897 12:55 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    BoA or Visa would issue the token directly to their existing customers.
  • @heunland #54898 12:56 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    Ok let me know when they have been convinced to do so
  • @heunland #54899 12:56 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    And what is the incentive for them to do so
  • @heunland #54900 12:58 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    Or any crypto exchange to accept that token as legit form of KYC that would stand up in a court of law
  • @ffmad ↶ Reply to #54891 #54901 01:17 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    Yep. That's why protocol is the right word
  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54902 01:46 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    If Bitcoin had scaled Counterparty would be highly valuable imo.
  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54903 01:48 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    Bitcoin is still the same since 4 years ago, even Ethereum is the same lol
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #54882 #54916 02:58 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    All the xcp on the DEX at or below current zaif price have been snatched up lately.... some ppl prolly looking to see if they can sell some xcp for a profit😀👍🏻
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #54889 #54917 03:06 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    Personally I still think we could implement KYC support via white lists..... asset owner registers asset with kyc list option....client gives asset owner/central authority their bitcoin address.... bank/company/asset owner does traditional kyc on clients (lookup client info, verify nationality, make sure not on ofac list, etc)...... then central authority just broadcasts/maintains a list of addresses that are allowed to hold their asset.. and they deposit the asset for the client..... the platform then limits the sending/trading of the asset to only addresses on the asset owners list..... easy peasy kyc enforced at a protocol level..... assets can only be held/traded by approved customers.... easy for a company to verify to the gov that their token won’t get traded outside of the approved kyc customers
  • @jdogresorg #54918 03:10 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    That being said.... what we have right now is working fine.... at some point if we hear that companies are specifically NOT using Counterparty because they can't limit their token to only KYC approved clients, then we can consider adding this feature...... maintaining lists is not really a great use of Counterparty.
  • @h4xor_f0r_Lif3 ↶ Reply to #54855 #54919 04:09 PM, 23 Aug 2020

    giphy (2).mp4

  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54920 05:12 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    if funds are a main issue, has the team considered raising funds from VC's or big funds. Cash is really abundant right now and literal scams are raising millions....
  • @XCERXCP ↶ Reply to #54920 #54921 07:13 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    And what in return would you give these VC’s? You benefit from the protocol rise in value by owning XCP.
  • @ffmad #54922 07:14 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    @jdogresorg is XCP not too hard to install? (for an exchange)
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #54921 #54923 07:21 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    good question. equity or even a token swap with new tokenomics
  • @XCERXCP ↶ Reply to #54923 #54924 07:28 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    Companies/startups that use the protocol can raise funds and donate to the development of CP
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #54922 #54925 07:36 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    https://counterparty.io/docs/exchange_integration/ nope.... installing xcp isn’t hard... a bit of a large disk footprint at the moment using indexd.... but still easy for exchange to integrate if they want.....we don’t have exchange listings cuz it’s a pay to play game now..... we get offers to get listed on exchanges all the time but all want 1-10 BTC listing fees.... I’m not paying a listing fee and I dont think community should either.... funds better spent on improving the protocol..... if someone wanted to pay for a listing, go for it😀👍🏻
  • @ffmad ↶ Reply to #54925 #54926 07:50 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    Shouldn't be paid
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #54930 #54933 08:29 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    read posts below thiss
  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54934 08:29 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    you cant sell into them
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #54930 #54935 09:20 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    http://xchain.io/market/XCP/BTC check buy and sell order tabs
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #54934 #54936 09:21 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    Yes, you can... dunno where your getting the idea that people are able to place fake/ghost orders on the DEX or that people are not able to buy with BTC... I explained to you yesterday how BTC on the DEX works, so not sure why your still saying stuff like "can't sell into them"
  • @jdogresorg #54937 09:21 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    if an order is on the DEX, you can place a matching order.... the only thing that is questionable is if when your order matches with someone if they will send you the BTC, or if your order match will expire and wait for a match with someone else
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #54936 #54938 09:55 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    yes but when people see a limit buy order they usually assume they can sell their XCP onto it and get BTC immediately, but thats not the case
  • @pqrstpqrstvw #54939 09:55 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    i just didnt explain to him fully
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #54943 #54946 11:08 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    Partial fills are possible... depends on if someone matches ur whole order or just part of it
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #54945 #54947 11:08 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    Please scroll up and review the conversation I had yesterday on how BTC on the DEX works
  • @jdogresorg #54948 11:09 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    I have explained why the orderbook overlaps at few times.... cuz people ahve placed orders to buy stuff with BTC, but are not actually sending the BTCpayment... so the order match expires.... explained it all yesterday complete with links to examples of orders with partial matches, links to orders with expired matches, etc
  • @jdogresorg #54949 11:10 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    Using BTC on the DEX is a bit different than every other asset on the DEX.... BTC can't be escrowed by the DEX... so you place a BTC buy order, someone places a sell order.. the 2 orders match, THEN the buyer has 20 blocks to send the BTC payment directly to the sellers address..... once the DEX detects the payment for the order match, then the actual trade excutes.
  • @jdogresorg #54950 11:10 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    The overlap is due to ppl who placed orders to buy stuff using BTC..... their ordres matched with sellers, but they never sent the BTC (they need to be using freewallet.io with auto-BTCpay setup to automatically listen for order matches and send the BTC payment within 20 blocks).... so after 20 blocks, the order match expires, and the XCP becomes available again for someone else to purchase...... process goes on and on until the order matches with someone who actually pays
  • @jdogresorg #54951 11:10 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    sec i'll get ya an example
  • @jdogresorg #54952 11:10 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    http://xchain.io/tx/1525682
  • @jdogresorg #54953 11:10 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    There is a good example... someone placed an order to sell some XCP... people placed orders to buy XCP... order matches took place, but the buyers never sent the BTC... so you see the order matches expire
  • @jdogresorg #54954 11:10 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    process repeats.... order match, wait for payment, free up XCP when order payment doesn't come.... rinse and repeat until the system matches with a buyer who actually DOES send the BTC payment for the order in the 20 block window
  • @jdogresorg #54955 11:10 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    that is why you see 8 expired orders on the above link.... and 2 successfull/completed ones
  • @jdogresorg #54956 11:10 PM, 23 Aug 2020
    using BTC on the DEX is a lil bit more complex than using any other asset on the DEX... which is why BTC wasn't used on the DEX for a number of years..... no easy way to use BTC on the DEX... counterwallet wouldn't make the BTCpay transactions
  • 24 August 2020 (14 messages)
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #54971 #54972 01:45 AM, 24 Aug 2020
    That's exactly the case, I wish the orders would disappear after a certain time.
  • @jdogresorg #54973 02:04 AM, 24 Aug 2020
    Orders do disappear after a certain amount of time... I believe the max is 8064 blocks... you set when the order expires when you place the order.
  • @jdogresorg #54974 02:06 AM, 24 Aug 2020
    https://i.gyazo.com/e18f2cb079b61b6843749dc1f9e515d9.png
    None
  • @jdogresorg #54975 02:07 AM, 24 Aug 2020
    See that "Expires" box with 8064 in it... that is how many blocks the order expires in... so you can specify exactly how many blocks you want your order to be valid.... once the order expires, it is removed from the DEX orderbook
  • @jdogresorg #54981 02:15 AM, 24 Aug 2020
    🙂👍
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #54973 #54988 01:34 PM, 24 Aug 2020
    👍
  • @1270230705 #54989 03:41 PM, 24 Aug 2020
    client.start(bot_token='token')
  • @XCERXCP ↶ Reply to #54989 #54996 05:38 PM, 24 Aug 2020
    What’s this?
  • @XCERXCP ↶ Reply to #54917 #54997 05:41 PM, 24 Aug 2020
    When you say “The platform limits the sending/trading of the assets”, are you referring to CP as the platform?
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #54997 #54999 06:00 PM, 24 Aug 2020
    Yes, referring to CP (counterparty-lib) as the platform.
  • @XCERXCP ↶ Reply to #54999 #55002 06:25 PM, 24 Aug 2020
    CP should do this, adds a lot of upside
  • @XCERXCP #55003 06:30 PM, 24 Aug 2020
    “the platform then limits the sending/trading of the asset to only addresses on the asset owners list.”

    Asset owners list would just be the broadcast btc address? The list is created and read by the protocol just by the broadcast list?
  • @jdogresorg #55010 07:32 PM, 24 Aug 2020
    This is a potential feature in the future... so, how it would all work is not clearly defined yet... YES, it would be reading a list... how that list would best be broadcast/maintained is yet to be determined.
  • @XCERXCP #55011 07:48 PM, 24 Aug 2020
    I like this a lot. Private funds could become more liquid and accessible.
  • 25 August 2020 (13 messages)
  • @heunland #55024 12:04 AM, 25 Aug 2020
    If you have a question please post it
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #55024 #55025 12:05 AM, 25 Aug 2020
    Some OTC scammer again. Looks like he deleted the message
  • @heunland #55026 12:22 AM, 25 Aug 2020
    👍
  • @Rob_RS1000 ↶ Reply to #54954 #55044 07:41 AM, 25 Aug 2020
    So only freewallet Auto confirms BTC trades? U learn something new everyday 😂 Any BTC Order submitted using Counterparty if hypothetically matched, seller/buyer would need to be watching and actually manually complete the transaction??? Is that correct? If so that is horrible.... 🤦‍♂️ but all XCP tokens auto complete when matched👍🏼
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #55044 #55054 02:56 PM, 25 Aug 2020
    That is correct.
  • @Rob_RS1000 #55064 06:38 PM, 25 Aug 2020
    Thanks for confirming 🙏 that is good info to know 👍🏼
  • @jdogresorg #55065 10:04 PM, 25 Aug 2020
    https://twitter.com/XChain_io/status/1298380185293606912
    XChain

    Happy to announce some updates at https://t.co/kg6pp6YNN1 including over 4000 new asset icons, support for viewing NFT artwork directly in the blockchain explorer, and more!

  • @XCERXCP #55066 10:07 PM, 25 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-25_22-07-23.jpg
  • @XCERXCP #55067 10:07 PM, 25 Aug 2020
    Sweet nice update
  • @jdogresorg #55068 10:08 PM, 25 Aug 2020

    giphy (2).mp4

  • @h4xor_f0r_Lif3 #55069 10:17 PM, 25 Aug 2020
    Lol
  • @heunland #55073 10:47 PM, 25 Aug 2020
    sticker (7).webp
  • @heunland #55082 11:46 PM, 25 Aug 2020
    Anyone wanting to sell XCP please post a sell order on the DEX or make a dispenser. Everyone should be very careful when people ask you to contact them by DM. This is a red flag - don't fall for scammers! Anyone posting announcements involving trades only available by DM will be booted from this chat.
  • 26 August 2020 (158 messages)
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #55065 #55083 12:42 AM, 26 Aug 2020

    mp4.mp4

  • @ffmad #55123 01:03 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    what do you guys think of RGB? I'm trying to understand the tech and it's usage compared to XCP
  • @Rob_RS1000 #55124 02:09 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    Is there a freewallet io Dispenser tutorial?
  • @jdogresorg #55125 02:14 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    No, there is not.... In the wallet itself I have a little questionnmark next to each field which describes that field and what data is expected.
  • @jdogresorg #55126 02:14 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    https://i.gyazo.com/2d2b0332ae69734461f81ceaf1d2829f.png
    None
  • @jdogresorg #55127 02:17 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    General Dispensers guidelines
    1.) setup dispensers at a new address (so any incoming BTC is clearly for the dispenser)
    2.) Setup dispensers on traditional addresses (no segwit support currently)
    3.) Only setup one dispenser per address (unless you want to vend multiple tokens at the same time)
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #55123 #55131 03:14 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    https://github.com/LNP-BP/FAQ/issues/11
    RGB vs existing alternatives comparison · Issue #11 · LNP-BP/FAQ

    RGB compared to Liquid Confidential Assets: Works with Lightning Network Replaces Large Borromean signatures range proofs with modern Bulletproofs No blockchain space consumption! Universal smart c...

  • @ffmad ↶ Reply to #55131 #55132 03:16 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    The "much higher privacy" seems not really good for tokens like NFTs
  • @ffmad #55133 03:17 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    Where you want full history
  • @104473096 #55134 03:20 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i think most ppl are mixing 2 or 3 concepts for tokens that aren't reconciliable
  • @104473096 #55135 03:21 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    1) the security/share/equity/bond
    2) the value-bearer token
    3) the on-chain metadata-anchored token
  • @104473096 #55136 03:22 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    most "it doesn't have privacy" are on item 1
  • @104473096 #55137 03:22 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    most "it doesn't has LN" are on 2
  • @104473096 #55138 03:22 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    the rest (NFT, art, gaming, etc) are on 3
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55133 #55139 03:23 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    the thing with RGB is privacy by default, but you can still disclose the information if you want to
  • @ffmad ↶ Reply to #55139 #55140 03:25 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    Seems interesting, but not for the n° 3) token that @chiguireitor described
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55134 #55141 03:25 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    RGB is a smart contract system, so it’s not just about tokens
  • @104473096 #55142 03:26 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i'm almost sure RGB got its uses
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55140 #55143 03:26 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    actually, this is also the case
  • @104473096 #55144 03:27 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i would argue that RGB is barking at the wrong tree touting privacy
  • @104473096 #55145 03:27 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    but i'm deeply biased
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55144 #55146 03:28 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    What do you mean here?
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55145 #55147 03:29 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    Can be. It has changed a lot since 2019/2018.
  • @104473096 #55148 03:29 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    privacy for art/nfts/game stuff isn't relevant imo
  • @104473096 #55149 03:29 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    in fact
  • @104473096 #55150 03:29 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    could be detrimental
  • @104473096 #55151 03:29 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    again
  • @104473096 #55152 03:29 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i'm super-hugely-mega-hyper biased
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55152 #55153 03:30 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    Ok, I can stop the discussion now to save you from the hustle :)
  • @104473096 #55154 03:30 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    lol
  • @104473096 #55155 03:30 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    no don't worry
  • @104473096 #55156 03:30 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    you're entitled to your opinion and your tought process
  • @104473096 #55157 03:30 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i would like to hear args about privacy on nfts/art/gaming in general
  • @104473096 #55158 03:31 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    tbh i haven't heard a good enough argument about it in that respect
  • @104473096 #55159 03:31 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i get it about value representations and nº 1 in my item list
  • @104473096 #55160 03:32 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    but most action on the xcp side of the fence is gaming and art
  • @104473096 #55161 03:33 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i concede though.... a "blockchain" for most of these purposes is kinda "bloated"
  • @krostue ↶ Reply to #55148 #55162 03:33 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    Imho same
  • @104473096 #55163 03:34 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i like what the rarible guys made about the tax for secondary sales of the assets..... i'm not super-excited about the implementation though
  • @104473096 #55164 03:34 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    would be lovely to implement something like that in xcp...
  • @krostue #55165 03:36 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    Of all the possible features I do not think that this is a priority at the moment
  • @krostue #55166 03:41 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    I have also considered ways to implement kyc systematically. ultimately I don't want the burden of record-keeping, so I think a third party would be useful if not required.

    I am against the rerouting of funds by the system (in this case) but I am in tune with the idea of exclusive tokens to comply with varoius legal requirements
  • @ffmad ↶ Reply to #55163 #55167 03:43 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    that's a feature loved by cryptoartist
  • @krostue #55168 03:43 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    Not all tho
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #55167 #55169 03:43 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    😂
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #55166 #55170 03:45 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    whitelists/blacklists can be implemented as an opt-in feature.... i think i could write up a CIP eventually for that
  • @ffmad ↶ Reply to #55150 #55171 03:45 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    agreed on this. Privacy isn't a useful feature for art/nfts/games, could be misused by creators to scam people too
  • @ffmad #55172 03:45 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    "yeah this art is unique" LOL
  • @ffmad #55173 03:46 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    and the guy made 10 identical private NFTS for his "digital art"
  • @104473096 #55174 03:46 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    yup
  • @104473096 #55175 03:46 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    again
  • @104473096 #55176 03:47 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    it's an art/gaming thing
  • @104473096 #55177 03:47 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    you want leaderboards
  • @104473096 #55178 03:47 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    a "who's who" is needed
  • @ffmad #55179 03:47 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    sticker (7).webp
  • @104473096 #55180 03:48 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    however.... selective privacy could be big in chance games
  • @104473096 #55181 03:48 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    but that's an implementation detail
  • @ffmad ↶ Reply to #55180 #55182 03:48 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    how do you see the usage in chance games?
  • @104473096 #55183 03:49 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i.e. knowing what the other player can play against you could be a leg up in some aspects
  • @104473096 #55184 03:50 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    in TCGs getting 3-4 cards played from your counterpart could reduce the holders of a certain combination of cards greatly
  • @104473096 #55185 03:50 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i can think of ways to give a leg up in that scenario
  • @104473096 #55186 03:50 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    but it's 1 scenario
  • @104473096 #55187 03:50 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    and again, it's an implementation detail
  • @ffmad #55188 03:51 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    interesting 👍
  • @1270230705 #55189 04:31 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    why returns None?
  • @1270230705 #55190 04:31 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    not really
  • @104473096 #55191 04:31 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    ?
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #55189 #55192 05:10 PM, 26 Aug 2020

    mp4.mp4

  • @pqrstpqrstvw #55193 05:15 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    looking to buy 10-15k XCP, if you are selling lets setup on DEX or Dispenser.
  • @XCERXCP ↶ Reply to #55170 #55194 05:16 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    I think this is a must have for SEC compliance of trading CP assets. Opens up a lot of new use cases that aren’t possible currently.
  • @104473096 #55195 05:16 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i concur
  • @104473096 #55196 05:17 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    centrally controlled w/b-lists are a must for these use cases
  • @krostue #55209 07:10 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    there is always more than one way to skin a cat
  • @krostue #55210 07:10 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    not everyone wants to let the cat out of the bag in the marketplace
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55157 #55214 07:23 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    so there are many dimensions to answering this.

    1. As an issuer you can post the information about the tokens that you had issued. And every future owner of the token will be obliged to verify the info against the one you posted. So, basically, this gives you as an owner to validate the data before accepting it/stepping into the ownership.

    2. For example if we take a painting worth 500k, I am sure that not everyone would want the whole world to know that he’s the owner. This is why RGB uses client-side validation and gives you a bearer right for every asset you own.

    3. As for the gaming, 100% privacy might not be that needed, but you still need to prove the history only when it’s required and not make your skins visible to everyone by default.
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55171 #55215 07:25 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    wel…not really. every further asset owner needs to prove the asset data against the Schema before they accept the transaction. Thus, if the data doesn’t match - you simply reject the transaction.

    For sure, scammers might find their ways, but they would probably not be tech-related
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55180 #55216 07:26 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    I’m not familiar with chance games tbh. can you please explain it like I’m 5?
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #55216 #55217 07:28 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    TCGs in general have a lot of chance involved
  • @104473096 #55218 07:28 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    deck shuffling
  • @104473096 #55219 07:28 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    etc
  • @ffmad ↶ Reply to #55215 #55220 07:28 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    If the creator makes 10 assets privately for one digital art, every owner can ignore that others exist if he wants this to stay private nope?
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #55214 #55221 07:29 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    being father of 3 and having 2 additional teenagers at home from my gf's side, i can tell you skins/cosmetics are big to be shown to everyone
  • @104473096 #55222 07:29 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    kiddos WANT everyone to know they have the most/better skins or items
  • @104473096 #55223 07:29 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    it's basically their socialization ladder
  • @ffmad ↶ Reply to #55221 #55224 07:30 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    Yeah, that's the point of it
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55222 #55225 07:30 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    then nothing stops them from revealing that info
  • @104473096 #55226 07:30 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    yup
  • @ffmad #55227 07:30 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    You don't collect Rarepepes in privacy
  • @104473096 #55228 07:30 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    but it gets even better when everyone can see who's who
  • @104473096 #55229 07:30 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    because collecting them becomes aspirational
  • @dr_ukolova #55230 07:31 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    well, you can tease people still
  • @104473096 #55231 07:31 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    and the vicariousness of watching someone else's collection is really something
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55220 #55232 07:31 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    yup. every participant sees only one particular part of the history, but is still able to verify everything up to genesis block
  • @104473096 #55233 07:31 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i do enjoy showing off CryptoChainer's or HodlenCoinfeld's rarepepe collections
  • @dr_ukolova #55234 07:32 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    hehhehe 🙂
  • @104473096 #55235 07:32 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    they have massive collections that no one else is even remotely near them
  • @104473096 #55236 07:32 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    and that's also a way to show off the project's success
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55236 #55237 07:33 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    how so?
  • @104473096 #55238 07:34 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    you can immediatly and statically gauge a project's success by the amount of collectors and their enagagement into collecting them
  • @104473096 #55239 07:34 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    again
  • @104473096 #55240 07:34 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    huge huge disclaimer
  • @104473096 #55241 07:35 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i'm very biased because that's one of my interests
  • @104473096 #55242 07:35 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    showing off the success of rarepepe and rarepepe.party (when the game gets released) is a must
  • @104473096 #55243 07:35 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    same for any other projects i deploy publicly
  • @104473096 #55244 07:38 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    however.... i do see value in privacy....
  • @104473096 #55245 07:38 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    but not for collectibles
  • @krostue #55246 07:38 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    the theme of the room has bias interests, as it should. IT would be great if there is some kind of RGB-XCPmadeasset gateway at the end of this conversation. That would shed light
  • @krostue #55247 07:39 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    otherwise i guess it is good to compare notes.
  • @krostue #55248 07:39 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    is RGB going to institutionalize residual payment to the originator?
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55238 #55249 07:40 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    that’s fair for any project/business/product etc, so you are right for sure
  • @104473096 #55250 07:40 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    yup.... that's my bias 🤣
  • @104473096 #55251 07:40 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    but indeed i've been watching rgb
  • @104473096 #55252 07:40 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    seems interesting.... moreso the fact that it's deploying LN tokens
  • @104473096 #55253 07:41 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    which is great
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55245 #55254 07:41 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    maybe. I’m not deeply familiar with collectibles use cases, so you definitely know more here 🙂
  • @104473096 #55255 07:41 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    and there's indeed a lot of places an off-chain non-native token could be very useful
  • @104473096 #55256 07:41 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i.e. migrating pepecash to an offchain LN based solution would prove to be momentous
  • @104473096 #55257 07:42 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    however, DEX functionality remains to be seen
  • @dr_ukolova #55258 07:42 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    my bias is that everything should be private by default though lol. not in the meanin of ‘hidden’, but in the meaning of ‘only I choose when and if to reveal anything about the thing'
  • @krostue #55259 07:42 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    just to be clear, there is no DEX on RGB?
  • @104473096 #55260 07:42 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    you could theoretically have LN nodes that receive one asset on a side and emit one on the other side
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55251 #55261 07:42 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    oh nice!
  • @104473096 #55262 07:42 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    dunno if it's implemented tho
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55252 #55263 07:42 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    thanks, yeah, shit ton of work though
  • @104473096 #55264 07:43 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    been overworked this whole year
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55259 #55265 07:43 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    there is an effort to build that, yes. but at first the LN part should be finished
  • @krostue #55266 07:43 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    ok thanks
  • @104473096 #55267 07:44 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    if LN nodes can translate between different tokens/coins, a DEX of sorts could be implemented
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55264 #55268 07:44 PM, 26 Aug 2020

    giphy (2).mp4

  • @104473096 #55269 07:44 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    there's a feature though that needs to be defeated on LN swaps
  • @104473096 #55270 07:45 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    mainly preventing the LN swap becoming an option
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55267 #55271 07:45 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    correct. there is also a watchtower-ish server called Bifrost that can potentially work as a routing node. but again, wip
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55270 #55272 07:45 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    can you elaborate more on this?
  • @104473096 #55273 07:45 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    there's a paper (i lost track of it) where an "attack" was devised on border LN nodes
  • @104473096 #55274 07:46 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    where you treat an LN node as an "option" (but a specific kind of option i don't recall the name off)
  • @104473096 #55275 07:46 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    mainly, you use an LN node liquidity as a hedge against volatility
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55273 #55276 07:46 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    whose work is it? guys from Lightning Labs?
  • @104473096 #55277 07:47 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    and keep old signed HTLCs just in case you need to execute the option at a previous price to rewind losses
  • @104473096 #55278 07:47 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    aaagh can't remember tbh
  • @104473096 #55279 07:47 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    gotta search it
  • @104473096 #55280 07:47 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    it was a year or two ago
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55280 #55281 07:47 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    oh wow..hmm.. need to look at it indeed
  • @104473096 #55282 07:50 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    i'll try to find it and forward it to you
  • @104473096 #55283 07:50 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    was eye opening
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #55274 #55284 07:50 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    Financial option, there was a temporal window extended.
  • @104473096 #55285 07:50 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    was that the reason to extend the penalty window, right?
  • @Needmoney90 #55286 07:50 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    The person offering the channel has a time period where their counterparty can cancel the TX
  • @Needmoney90 #55287 07:51 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    Which means the counterparty can optionally cancel their channel if price fluctuations are high enough in their favor
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55282 #55288 07:51 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    thanks, that would be much appreciated!
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #55287 #55289 07:51 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    yeah, this was the rationale
  • @104473096 #55292 07:51 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    (btw olga, needmo is also on the privacy as default train)
  • @Needmoney90 #55293 07:52 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    sticker (7).webp
  • @dr_ukolova ↶ Reply to #55293 #55294 07:52 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    sticker (7).webp
  • @104473096 #55296 08:26 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    Btw @dr_ukolova here's hodlecoinfeld's collection https://rare.estate/?btc=1AtcSh7uxenQ6AR5xqr6agAegWRUF5N4uh&
  • @dr_ukolova #55297 08:29 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    niiice!
  • @dr_ukolova #55298 08:30 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    so the website is some sort of a collection explorer?
  • @dr_ukolova #55299 08:30 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    Pepe owners’ explorer 🙂
  • @krostue #55300 11:19 PM, 26 Aug 2020
    More like most of CounterParty and ethereum cryptoart in one place for user collection display
  • 27 August 2020 (19 messages)
  • @1012674213 #55312 07:10 AM, 27 Aug 2020
    Hey all just wondering where I might be directed to a rare pepe trading group, i am representing someone who holds a crazy collection and looking to sell
  • @ffmad ↶ Reply to #55246 #55317 08:49 AM, 27 Aug 2020
    Could be interesting
  • @XCERXCP #55318 12:43 PM, 27 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-27_12-43-14.jpg
  • @XCERXCP #55319 12:43 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    Lot more fun viewing sends on xchain with new update
  • @jdogresorg #55323 02:34 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    https://t.me/wthauctionhouse
    🐸🖼 🏦 WTH Auction House 🏦🖼🐸

    Live auctions of Rare Pepes, Dank Rares, Fake Rares, Wojak Way, Memorychain, Oasis Mining, and other Counterparty collectables. Boss: @RarePepeTrader. Please MAKE SURE user name is exact in DMs. News and Updates: @WTHAuctionHouseNews

  • @jdogresorg #55324 02:35 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    https://t.me/joinchat/BRVvb0CXaxt2jjCb5OZSsA
  • @jdogresorg #55325 02:35 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    https://t.me/rarepepepartygamedev
    Rare Pepe Party chat 🐸🐸

    Ask devs about the game, share ideas and content. Way more verbose than the channel for announcements @RarePepeParty

  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #55312 #55326 02:36 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    ^^ see above links
  • @krostue ↶ Reply to #55312 #55333 03:21 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    your friend may want to wait until the game comes out
  • @1012674213 #55334 03:28 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    Thanks for the links
  • @XCERXCP #55349 08:55 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    Is there a way for anyone to post their card so it views on xchain?
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #55349 #55358 09:21 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    You can use freeport.io to create an artwork NFT..... you also can use the format 'imgur/unique_image_code.jpg;artwork title' for the asset description...
  • @jdogresorg #55359 09:21 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    https://xchain.io/asset/BRRRRRRRRRRR
  • @jdogresorg #55360 09:22 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    Take a look at the above asset for an example... if you upload your image to imgur and use that style format... your image will display on xchain... or, just register your asset using freeport.io's interface 🙂
  • @XCERXCP ↶ Reply to #55360 #55361 09:32 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    👍
  • @Shubham_11 #55365 10:11 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    xcp
  • @XCERXCP #55367 10:16 PM, 27 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-27_22-16-34.jpg
  • @XCERXCP #55368 10:16 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    Now that’s a 💼
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #55367 #55371 11:12 PM, 27 Aug 2020
    Sir please sell me your bag
  • 28 August 2020 (7 messages)
  • @XCERXCP ↶ Reply to #55371 #55373 01:17 AM, 28 Aug 2020
    Not mine.
  • @pqrstpqrstvw ↶ Reply to #55373 #55374 01:22 AM, 28 Aug 2020
    🤦‍♂️
  • @ssz0x #55417 02:13 PM, 28 Aug 2020
    hey guys lets take big bag
  • @ssz0x #55418 02:14 PM, 28 Aug 2020
    can still buy with freewallet or its not update anymore ? which wallet working?
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #55418 #55419 02:58 PM, 28 Aug 2020
    Freewallet.io desktop wallet is working and you can use the DEX interface.... the mobile version of freewallet is older and doesn't support the DEX
  • @join_captcha_bot #55421 b o t 03:28 PM, 28 Aug 2020
    Hello ‎Paula Fiorita, welcome to ‎Official Counterparty Chat, please write a message with the numbers and/or letters that appear in this image to verify that you are a human. If you don't solve the captcha in 5 mins, you will be automatically kicked out of the group.

    photo_2020-08-28_15-28-12.jpg
  • @BobWillow #55422 04:57 PM, 28 Aug 2020
    1551
  • 30 August 2020 (66 messages)
  • @bobguy12345 ↶ Reply to #43418 #55455 02:35 AM, 30 Aug 2020
    Nothing
  • @bobguy12345 ↶ Reply to #43418 #55456 02:35 AM, 30 Aug 2020
    VM
  • @Rob_RS1000 #55466 10:55 AM, 30 Aug 2020
    What does dispensers status : closed mean... for example..
    Asset XYZ - escrowed 20 - give amount 20 - give remaining- 0 - price - status :closed ?
  • @jdogresorg #55473 03:01 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    closed == out of order / empty vending machine
  • @Rob_RS1000 #55474 03:18 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    Why is that? Fee too low when created or why might it be?
  • @Rob_RS1000 #55475 03:18 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    So basically asset is not for sale
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #55474 #55476 03:28 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    Dispenser sold out, or owner unplugged the machine
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #55475 #55477 03:30 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    Correct
  • @XCERXCP #55478 03:37 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    You could build some fun ui for a dispenser.
  • @ssz0x #55479 04:49 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    hey guys please send me 1xcp in this adresse i need it for sweep funds
  • @ssz0x #55480 04:49 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    bc1qklry233y3c3lcwghjykhr9ha9darfk5dd32tj7
  • @ssz0x #55481 04:49 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    freewalet is bug i cant buy because api error
  • @krostue #55482 06:08 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    I don't think sweep works. You may want to attempt a multi send instead
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #55482 #55492 07:26 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    Sweep works fine... however it requires a bit of XCP as an anti-spam fee
  • @jdogresorg #55493 07:26 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    https://i.gyazo.com/f3e0eceb2ae955f84b06c79a7b386a6c.png
    None
  • @jdogresorg #55494 07:26 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    http://xchain.io/tx/1493224
  • @jdogresorg #55496 07:27 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    The old "sweep" method in counterwallet was just daisy-chaining tsends together.... the new sweep actually moves everything in a single tx.... thx to @chiguireitor for CIP20.. https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/cips/blob/master/cip-0020.md
    cips/cip-0020.md at master · CounterpartyXCP/cips

    Counterparty Improvement Proposals. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/cips development by creating an account on GitHub.

  • @krostue ↶ Reply to #55496 #55500 07:33 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    Very cool. Thanks for the clarification
  • @104473096 #55501 07:44 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    👍
  • @ssz0x #55502 08:14 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    just 1xcp please guys i cant bc1qklry233y3c3lcwghjykhr9ha9darfk5dd32tj7
  • @ssz0x #55503 08:14 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    i cant move my funds cuz i need xcp for pay fees
  • @ssz0x #55504 09:23 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    nice community cant even send 1xcp 1euro i cant fucking enable to trade anything in this freewalet shit
  • @104473096 #55505 09:24 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    @ebonyissou keeping that attitude is a sure way to get kicked out
  • @104473096 #55506 09:24 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    consider this your first warning
  • @ssz0x #55507 09:25 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    i have 100$ blocked on this freewallet
  • @ssz0x #55508 09:25 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    without 1xcp i cant move my funds
  • @ssz0x #55509 09:25 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    and i cant trade on it because api bug
  • @ssz0x #55510 09:25 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    its too much 1xcp for you even you are admin here ?
  • @ssz0x #55511 09:26 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    its amazing i cant buy in any exchange
  • @ssz0x #55512 09:28 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    Error composing sweep transaction via API: ['insufficient XCP balance for sweep. Need 0.5 XCP for antispam fee']
  • @heunland #55513 09:29 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    You can buy by using a dispenser. Has been explained many times before. This is a volunteer run open source community project. Aggressive demands will not get you far. I suggest you change your attitude and try a more friendly approach. Also please note it is a weekend, those of us answering do so on our free time.
  • @ssz0x #55514 09:30 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    i cant sweep in counterwallet with private key i press sweep button nothing happening
  • @ssz0x #55517 09:31 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    im asking since 2 days
  • @ssz0x #55518 09:31 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    I cant import privatekey my funds are blocked in freewalet please send me 1xcp on this adresse
  • @heunland #55519 09:33 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    Also you are not entitled to make derogatory statements about freewallet. Have you contributed to its development? The dev that made this wallet as well as xchain.io is giving this to the community for free now. Noone is getting paid to give tech support here. You can buy XCP on a dispenser like everyone else.
  • @ssz0x #55520 09:33 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    Error composing send transaction via API: Insufficient BTC at address bc1qklry233y3c3lcwghjykhr9ha9darfk5dd32tj7. (Need approximately 0.0102809 BTC.) To spend unconfirmed coins, use the flag --unconfirmed. (Unconfirmed coins cannot be spent from multi‐sig addresses.)
  • @ssz0x #55521 09:34 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    what you mean about dispenser?
  • @ssz0x #55522 09:34 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    i know python only i can help do you need my github
  • @ssz0x #55523 09:35 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    even i try send btc to btc in freewalet i have this error message..
  • @XCERXCP #55524 09:35 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    I don’t think this address is valid for CP
  • @ssz0x #55526 09:36 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    cp?
  • @ssz0x #55527 09:36 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    look i try 0.005
  • @ssz0x #55528 09:36 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    Error composing send transaction via API: Insufficient BTC at address bc1qklry233y3c3lcwghjykhr9ha9darfk5dd32tj7. (Need approximately 0.00579375 BTC.) To spend unconfirmed coins, use the flag --unconfirmed. (Unconfirmed coins cannot be spent from multi‐sig addresses.)
  • @heunland #55529 09:36 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    CP =Counterparty
  • @ssz0x #55530 09:36 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    its segwit wallet in freewalet
  • @ssz0x #55531 09:36 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    adrese*
  • @104473096 #55532 09:38 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    send bitcoin to your standard non-segwit wallet, buy xcp from a dispenser, transfer to your segwit wallet, sweep it
  • @104473096 #55533 09:38 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    there
  • @104473096 #55534 09:38 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    easy
  • @104473096 #55535 09:38 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    when using freewallet try not to send all your balance.... maybe you have a polluted utxo set?
  • @104473096 #55536 09:39 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    nope... it's not polluted
  • @ssz0x #55537 09:39 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    ok thanks i try
  • @ssz0x #55538 09:40 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    Error composing send transaction via API: Insufficient BTC at address bc1qklry233y3c3lcwghjykhr9ha9darfk5dd32tj7. (Need approximately 0.00205375 BTC.) To spend unconfirmed coins, use the flag --unconfirmed. (Unconfirmed coins cannot be spent from multi‐sig addresses.)
  • @ssz0x #55539 09:40 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    i try buy from dispenser i have same error message im on ubuntu
  • @ssz0x #55541 09:40 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    i start app with terminal
  • @ssz0x #55543 09:41 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    please remove ban i cant send screenshoot...
  • @ssz0x #55544 09:45 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    i imported the private key in new electrum wallet its okay
  • @ssz0x #55545 09:49 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    thanks for help guys remove my ban please
  • @ssz0x #55546 09:49 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    im waiting for my gf now she gonna lick my ass
  • @XCERXCP #55547 10:04 PM, 30 Aug 2020

    photo_2020-08-30_22-04-26.jpg
  • @XCERXCP #55548 10:04 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    Rarepepe in dispenser..... for 0.5 BTC
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #55538 #55549 10:08 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    THe error says you need more BTC... so the solution is.... you guessed it.. you need more BTC
  • @ssz0x #55550 10:09 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    absolutely not because i try with 50% of my fund
  • @ssz0x #55551 10:09 PM, 30 Aug 2020
    but its okay i take back my funds now
  • @jdogresorg #55552 10:11 PM, 30 Aug 2020

    giphy (2).mp4

  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #55546 #55553 10:11 PM, 30 Aug 2020

    mp4.mp4

  • 31 August 2020 (5 messages)
  • @Frasseff #55556 02:16 AM, 31 Aug 2020
    2410
  • @Rob_RS1000 ↶ Reply to #55476 #55564 11:10 AM, 31 Aug 2020
    Ahhh, ok so if you disconnect from Freewallet, then dispenser goes out- essentially you pull plug 🔌 on vending machine ?
  • @104473096 #55565 01:30 PM, 31 Aug 2020
    nope
  • @104473096 #55566 01:30 PM, 31 Aug 2020
    dispensers have exactly that feature, that they don't need interactive operation
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #55564 #55570 03:27 PM, 31 Aug 2020
    No... Freewallet is only used to setup the dispenser... once a dispenser is open, you can closer freewallet.... the dispenser stays open and keeps giving out tokens until either a.) the vending machine runs out of tokens... or b.) The operator closes the dispenser ( a separate 'cancel/close' transaction)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 01 Aug 2020 (3)
  • 02 Aug 2020 (1)
  • 03 Aug 2020 (10)
  • 04 Aug 2020 (81)
  • 05 Aug 2020 (60)
  • 06 Aug 2020 (24)
  • 07 Aug 2020 (4)
  • 08 Aug 2020 (24)
  • 09 Aug 2020 (9)
  • 10 Aug 2020 (9)
  • 11 Aug 2020 (28)
  • 12 Aug 2020 (69)
  • 13 Aug 2020 (20)
  • 14 Aug 2020 (7)
  • 15 Aug 2020 (15)
  • 16 Aug 2020 (19)
  • 17 Aug 2020 (25)
  • 18 Aug 2020 (28)
  • 19 Aug 2020 (49)
  • 20 Aug 2020 (19)
  • 21 Aug 2020 (73)
  • 22 Aug 2020 (40)
  • 23 Aug 2020 (52)
  • 24 Aug 2020 (14)
  • 25 Aug 2020 (13)
  • 26 Aug 2020 (158)
  • 27 Aug 2020 (19)
  • 28 Aug 2020 (7)
  • 30 Aug 2020 (66)
  • 31 Aug 2020 (5)