- 01 August 2018 (3 messages)
-
Thinking this community is SAFE and encourages good convo I’d like to respond to this. In fairness a speculator might respect and appreciate a great project like Counterparty for the awesome team/community and their vision/ work. Dude could just be looking for a way to make needed income and enhanced value while simultaneously trying to support.
And opinionated thought pieces are just that. Each day brings new insights to all seeking wisdom and understanding. Doesn’t mean someone is trumped or a cafe should sway judgement so easily.
One can agree or disagree with moderators/devs or those in leadership roles and still be for a better future at same time.
Adoration for other projects sometimes ends up helpless because of judgement sometimes based on quick docs. There are two sides to a coin, but who here has only one coin in their wallet?
Some people need to “speculate” to attempt to earn money. Trade where they can to some how accumulate btc for the belief of the vision, and because they need income.
User shouldn’t be hitting up the tele with negativity but you guys are too awesome to then support your disapproval of it with more negativity.
Stupid eth projects might have had good charts to try and make a couple more sats to then put into great projects like Counterparty or cornholio. Or to just try and enhance much needed value. Some just tryn to make a dollar out of fifteen sense.
Take what you want from this. Just my two cents. Counterparty is awesome. If I had a vote I’d say ban negative shit. Just be sure your own opinion is researched trustworthy enough to tap the trigger and not built on a few layers of a potentially tormenting situation for someone who could be trying to survive while also wanting others to thrive.
Hopefully everything is crystal clear and remains beautifully enchanted. I’m sorry too. Some guys are just trying to learn as fast as they can. -
-
Mafia Wars
The https://t.co/4smUGHfrw4 design contest https://t.co/OblERWvHJm has ended and the winners have been chosen by The Commission. Congratulations to the winners : 1st - DIRTYRAT 2nd - LAUNDROMAT 3rd - MAFIABANK #MafiaWars #Bitcoin #BTC #Counterparty #XCP #BlockchainGaming
- 02 August 2018 (5 messages)
-
any upcoming developlment or event for XCP? anyone upcoming /
-
?
-
Dont really have any big events...and big dump again in exchange..
-
-
I didnt sell..im just saying theres dump in the market again..
- 03 August 2018 (5 messages)
-
I think Christian Moss of Indiesquare was doing some interesting things in regards to atomic swaps on counterparty: See here for instance. https://blog.indiesquare.me/counterparty-and-cross-chain-token-atomic-swaps-947b6b0011c1
-
-
/ban
-
can this be redeemed from rarepepewallet or is there a different wallet to redeem the mafiawars giftcards from now
-
You can redeem any MafiaWars giftcards on the website at mafiawars.io/redeem . If the giftcard is a RarePepe, it can also be redeemed at RarePepeWallet.com
- 04 August 2018 (4 messages)
-
-
Who's buyin' the XCP dip?
-
-
Please join us for the latest updates at our Foldingcoin Public Meeting starting in 1 hour 12 min at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDKb9JCSPJ4FoldingCoin Public Meeting August 2018
Come join the FoldingCoin and Curecoin communities to discuss the recent news and updates relating to the project. The Meeting Recap Notes can be found at th...
- 05 August 2018 (8 messages)
-
https://vocaroo.com/i/s0Pq2fttUcdo
I was not aware there was any battle between Bitcorn and Mafia Wars -
-
lol, but seriously, *someone* has to be buying from the people who are selling :)
-
yep
-
Can someone post link to transcription of this meeting?
-
How is the developer recruitment for xcp coming?
-
Wheres that?
-
- 06 August 2018 (1 messages)
-
In addition, there's active work being done on a golang implementation of counterparty for a port of counterparty to BCH.
- 07 August 2018 (6 messages)
-
Link or it didn't happen 🤣
-
counterpartyxcpc/gocoin-cash
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) written in Go (golang). Contribute to counterpartyxcpc/gocoin-cash development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
-
-
There is wormhole on bch which is Omni clone
-
- 08 August 2018 (10 messages)
-
big facts
-
was surprised actually, I'd written the project off but
It is active based on the GH, and based on some pics shared and discussions with the project lead. Contract was signed with the developer of gocoin and a couple of other contributors.
in addition they had announced a partnership secured with bitmain/antminer for the dev work; and other undisclosed parties. Some exchanges also have been in touch wrt to listing and even issuing their own token on the platform (owners a BCH fanboy)- then there's the bounties for a counterparty/colored coins port to BCH by the deep pocketed holders who wish to see use cases of their chain expand or at least be able to make some marketing points. I'm not sure a port of counterparty node to go was the most sensible thing they could of started with, but it's not a bad thing to have the ecosystem & codebase expand. -
I am more so for professional application and standardization. I don't care to much for the forks but we need to get with the program I do agree with that!
-
Hey guys. XCP is one of the biggest losers on CoinMarketCap today - I don't like to post price talks, but any idea what the reason for this could be? Exchange delisting? Any other negative news? I haven't seen anytign in other channels
-
I’m close to putting fresh money in
-
-
-
Gotta buy the dip. Some whale is on the other side of these sells. :P Who else would be buying at these levels?
-
Buy buy buy
-
- 09 August 2018 (70 messages)
-
-
Wow, XCP has dropped all the way to #364 on livecoinwatch, and #341 on coinmarketcap. Completely rekt.
-
-
I still want to know who's buying XCP, though. 24 hour volume is $261,283.
-
-
-
Some big whale wants to see xcp burn.... 🙄
-
-
it doesn't surprise me at all to know the motivation of a buyer; at what, 90% discount from Q1 this year and 96% ATH discount or something like that.. It's obscene to the point of irrationality how much the price has dropped considering no negative news.. especially when increased attention from two forks (at least one of which is offering an airdrop, which ironically might exceed the actual unit value of XCP ) and at least one of which is aiming for a high-profile exchange partnership.
And that there are multiple active projects already running. 4 year tested project with no documented loss of user funds, small supply, deflationary model and most of actual actual utility..Real projects.
Only down point from the POV of the markets is no regular new features added which all ADHD short term twitter/trading view traders rely on and claim dead otherwise. I'd say it's an absolute steal to be accumulating XCP at this price point.. and there are MUCH worse things to be buying.
Any savvy investor with a nice chunk of change or group could triple, quadruple..hell 10x their funds in a heartbeat and we'd still be WAY off the highs it's been at. Cannot say the same about many others coin without the same growth potential -
Maybe PK who had an amount which matches up with a 10k dump after he got banned got fed up.. What i want to know who else would be *selling* at this ridiculously low level and why. Guaranteed they're losing money in doing so.. other than impatience/needing money for hospital bills etc... verge of homelesness etc, i can only assume, somebody is trying to drive the price down- perhaps to accumulate themselves. or perhaps to offload any competitors.
-
The exchanges are the biggest bag holders
-
hm? exchanges only hold alts in custody they don't personally purchase off the users
-
They sell xcp to new users
-
That's not how it works, the XCP on exchanges is transferred by users and owned by users, not the exchanges. They'd only lose out on fees.
-
Are you sure? Explain address https://xchain.io/address/1AeqgtHedfA2yVXH6GiKLS2JGkfWfgyTC6
-
Internets too slow too load that atm, but I beleive that's bittrexxs cold wallet. Users send balance to store on the exchanges wallet, the user sells to someone else (or a user buys from someone else) and the exchange pockets a percentage fee of whatever coin is deposited/traded, that's their business model. They don't care about the underlying price.
-
Cool, TIL
-
It just looks like they are the biggest holders because unsavvy users (of most coins) tend to store their funds on an exchange rather than control themselves in their own wallet.
-
Easier that way
-
Plus it stays "liquid"
-
I guess so, but anyone that's lost money on exchanges (i lost everything more than once) is more cautious.
-
Anyone who knows the history knows not to keep money on an exchange
-
Yup. Not longer than you need to even if its convenient.
-
Thanks M.G. for clearing up my misconception
-
No worries. 👍
-
Eh.... this mostly holds true... however, a few exchanges have held large sums of XCP in cold storage in the past.... I think a year ago polo had about 30% of the supply of XCP in their COLD wallet.
-
-
moved 500K XCP to the hotwallet about 6 months ago
-
Not the best operating procedure but I suppose at the moment (and now owned by goldman) with the price so low covering any potential loss is hardly an issue for them.
-
-
Did they participate in the burn?
-
Nope... but I believe they were one of the first exchanges to list XCP... and acquired a good portion early on...... Them having such a large portion of XCP was always a concern of the community.... that they could dump on the market at any time.
-
Two Bitcoin Security Experts to Audit Counterparty Code | Counterparty
An anonymous white hat hacker recently discovered a vulnerability in the counterpartyd code, which he exploited to steal 35,000 XCP from Poloniex, a centralized exchange on which XCP is traded. The bug was quickly fixed and the fraudulent transaction invalidated, but not before the attacker sold the stolen funds for approximately 115 BTC, which he
-
Little known fact.... XCP did actually have a vuln which allowed stealing 35K xcp early on.
-
Iirc sergio demain lerner and peter todd gave it the green light
-
It pre-dates my involvement in XCP (I came in in late 2014, early 2015)
-
yeah it was from my memory
-
Sergio Lerner Completes Independent Security Audit | Counterparty
The Counterparty team is proud to announce the completion of our first independent code audit. Focusing on the security of counterpartyd and the Counterparty protocol, this audit was completed by professional cryptographer Sergio Demian Lerner between February 24 and April 5 of this year. Sergio has discovered numerous serious bugs in Bitcoin, and is extremely
-
Was there a revert made to a previous state? Or did the thief get away?
-
Read the link bro... 😛
-
white-hat... gave funds back 🙂
-
Ok ok lol
-
Yeah and it's trivial compared to the hacks ETH has seen
-
when Counterparty Classic? 😛
-
XCP has done good in the security department
-
Honestly, someone should.
-
Awww, a white hat so nice
-
Fork to ETC
-
Yep... and still have a fully funded bug bounty program to pay anyone who finds any security issues.
-
Bounty Program | Counterparty
Developers/bounties.md
-
I feel ya bro.... I bought at all the run-ups and peaks as well..... lost more BTC on XCP than I hold now.... as an investment vehicle XCP sucks to date.... as a platform, XCP is great.... tho would be nice to see dev pickup some more.
-
-
I reapect the work you're doing here though, a lot, including some of the early founders and contributors chased the ETH riches. You're putting in good work I just wish it would be noticed more by the markets
-
-
-
I work on XCP because I believe in it longer-term..... and I am having fun building stuff.... I am hopeful that in the future XCP will have its day.... but, either way I'm having fun building stuff and learning about crypto as I go, so its a win either way. 🙂
-
lotta people got snekked last few months its sad but true regardless of choices really boils down to luck ie what time you got up or went to sleep while shit happened
-
-
xcp spot rekt was a slomo replay of all the 100x fomoer's deaths from bitmex liquidations so theoretically at least you still got big bags that could one day rebound unlike all the liquid losers that lost it all
-
I mean xcp hit $100USD+ at pump peaks so setting high asks and walking away for a year isnt a bad idea
-
$6K worth of anything wont really amount to much these days - unless it's a crypto hoddle that at least has a lottery ticket chance of coming back ie cashing out makes little sense after so much rekt
-
IMO it'll bounce back.... CP dev efforts are being stepped up... lots of improvements in the works... just not highly visible.... just gotta ride out the bear market and wait for the correction 🙂
-
Maybe we as a community can encourage cp devs to log stuff on github so we can all see what is being worked on
-
Projects fork CP for their projects and make changes which can then be merged back into CP via pull requests.... just because your not seeing work being publicly being done in the github repo does not mean that there is not new features being worked on and tested by others privately for their own projects.
-
At this point CP has PRs which we need to get reviewed/tested/merged and rolled out to production... MPMA and indexd.... and AFAIK work is being done on that front.
-
It could be an OG XCP holder, so, not losing money
-
Would still be losing money against BTC though
-
Yeah
-
lol, I wish I were an OG XCP hodler. :)
-
I *was* around back then on BitcoinTalk, though.
- 10 August 2018 (7 messages)
-
-
lol
-
-
powered by counterparty
-
-
👍
-
Damn, definitely The OG 'oodman right there.
- 12 August 2018 (3 messages)
-
Samson Mow
According to the Bitmain pre-IPO investor deck, they sold most of their #Bitcoin for #Bcash. At $900/BCH, they've bled half a billion in the last 3 months. If Bitcoin Core devs didn't disclose the Bcash vulnerability, it could've wiped a billion dollars off their balance sheets.
-
CZ 🔶 Binance
We don't list shitcoins even if they pay 400 or 4,000 BTC. ETH/NEO/XRP/EOS/XMR/LTC/more listed with no fee. Question is not “how much does Binance charge to list?” but “is my coin good enough?” It’s not the fee, it's your project! Focus on your own project!
-
Guess that's why Bitmain invested in counterparty for BCH. The more relevance that chain gets the better for them.
- 13 August 2018 (6 messages)
-
Gamer Alert: What if Steem Monsters and Spells Of Genesis Partnered ? — Steemit
Many years ago, I became an ICO investor into the Spells Of Genesis (SOG) project as a partner. Spells Of Genesis… by pairmike
-
Yes.
-
Pepe isn't buying the XCP dip hard enough.
-
Technically, $31,060 volume
-
24h
-
I read things like the following, and how absurd their token is, but they have more volume than XCP: https://www.coindesk.com/ico-founders-will-wait-7-more-years-for-crypto-paydays/In Rare Decision, ICO Founders Will Delay Crypto Paydays – For a Decade
Nebulas raised $60 million in an ICO in December, but in order to help its team focus on completing its tech, it's extending its team's token lockup.
- 14 August 2018 (5 messages)
-
Cross posting this here
-
Curious why Im getting some tests failed, and how did you guys go about creating the scenarios for tests? Manually inserting all the data?
-
where was that?
-
Counterparty XCP TG group
-
Prolly should ask dev/support questions on slack.counterparty.io or counterpartytalk.org
- 15 August 2018 (116 messages)
-
I did forward them to the slack, but wasn't sure how active it is. so I expect they'll post there
-
-
"Named assets with 'A'" are consensus affecting tho
-
"Here are relatively trivial changes we can have in two weeks™:"
-
A stuff isn't trivial
-
you can't have "A" assets using the current encoding without stepping over numeric asset space
-
you could kludge it in with some stuff like the proposed XA...
-
but that's just a kludge
-
and reduces all A and X assets to 11 letters
-
yup.... the encoding sucks....
-
it's basically "assign a number to each letter and sum/multiply them"
-
and then A got assigned 0
-
check how numerics are verified in the code
-
it's all over the place
-
even one collision is hard to "identify"
-
yup
-
numerics otoh
-
isNumeric = asset.id > FIRST_NUMERIC
-
(example code, not real code)
-
cehcking for numerics is just checking that the idea is greater than some threshold
-
which seems witty until it doesn't
-
just as a suggestion, i invite you to make that "simple" change to the code, and run the test suite afterwards
-
LLL isn't that problematic because it is on the low asset space, purposefully reserved
-
my most sought after change is structural: make xcp compatible with 0.16.2
-
0.13 is a liability
-
there's a stumbling roadblock on indexd we're trying to get fixed
-
(namely, reorgs aren't handled atm)
-
feature wise?
-
sendall is pretty easy
-
and needed
-
i mean, who doesn't want to move their whole portfolio at once
-
i.e. for trezor storage
-
yup
-
the bitwise flags
-
it's completely on the same line of development "options" should be....
-
in fact, using that change we could implement easily the "anyone can..." features you're asking
-
yup.... initial idea was to make the code less "prone" to manipulation by coercing the only active option.... bitwise manipulation was meant to be introduced when a new feature required it
-
some of the other more "deep" changes we're experimenting with internally are pair fees (markets where the issuer of an asset can create a fee for that specific market)
-
chris is in
-
-
it's internal... you can do whatever internal test you want
-
that's the beauty of OSS
-
before cip proposal, you can have a regtest running all your code np
-
with 0.16.2
-
(0.13 didn't have proper regtest support)
-
on time my friend
-
same here
-
😐
-
but i would definitively focus all efforts on modern structural parts (bitcoin 0.16.2)
-
sendall? no way
-
doesn't makes any sense limiting it
-
dividends is another thing.... if it wasn't fee marked it could lead to spam
-
sendall, if you do it you're pretty much fucked up
-
can't spam constantly from an address that got emptied
-
the message itself is its own anti-spam mechanism
-
totally
-
the spam prevention is just there to prevent the case where a bot could fill the backlog with the same message over an over without an incumbent repercussion
-
in this case, loss of xcp makes it hard "financially"
-
sending has been abused
-
but has a more punishing "fee" in the BTC fee
-
dividends have so much bandwidth per btc fee that an additional xcp fee prevents abuse
-
same was talked for MPMA, but the conclusion was to limit MPMA sends to 1 send per block from a given source address iirc... don't remember if this was set on stone or if it was implemented
-
yes, and no
-
the question you should ask yourself is this...
-
"Can i abuse sendall over and over to fill the database with spam?"
-
that leads to 2 conclusions
-
1) you cannot sendall to the same address
-
2) an address cannot sendall multiple times on the same block
-
the limited resource on cp is more HDD ops
-
that's the bandwidth hog in fact
-
no
-
the trashing the HDD cache gets from an OP like dividends is severe.... even moreso if i emit multiple dividends
-
however, an address that does a sendall has nothing to send after it
-
this
-
that's why you have unit tests to cover those bases
-
a formal cip would state that sendall to the same address can't work
-
it's not the same address for CP
-
you could establish that (3) you cannot sendall unconfirmed funds
-
case covered
-
hmmm
-
what if the address doesn't has XCP?
-
dunno
-
same here
-
but it got to follow some logic principles too
-
we could just markup everything with gas fees
-
and wham! drive adoption... not!
-
remember that there's already the BTC fee
-
and most users are a little confused by that
-
LLL would make adoption rise? maybe... there's stuff with more impact though
-
yup
-
hmmm....
-
welp... gonna take a nap, need to be fully functioning in about 4 hours
-
"Dex-like Features:
- Decentralized Asset Sales (transfer ownership atomically)
"
Yess! Want this! 👌 -
Wow, a a lot to catch up on.
-
Great post. What are the major pitfalls roadblocking LLL assets (if any) at this stage?
-
consensus
-
CIP Proposal - Three Letter Asset Names
This thread is about a potential CIP that would allow for 3 letter asset names. I have some code that I think covers most of it here, for review and feedback: Result: 3 letter asset names become valid. 3 letter asset names require 10 XCP to issue. Todos: Testnet tx fixture for parsing.
-
Political, as in disagreement between users as to whether LlL assets are a good idea?
-
Thanks. reading through.
-
I think the 'can lead to scams' argument has a point on paper but would be fairly flimsy in actuality and is a bit overblown. Other platforms have managed fine. Scams can and will happen regardless.
Participants can and will do some level of due diligence, I absolutely believe this landscape (dex in particular, where a user would have to acquire btc and xcp they have already passed a certain threshold of capability to not get suddenly send their life savings to an evil boogeyman LLL the second it pops up. I really doubt anyone is easily fooled buying 'USD' instead of 'XUSD' or 'DOLLAR'..
Although at the same time I can't see a massive reason to have USD if there is already XUSD, other than invigorating the space and encouraging registration (assuming LLL's would be significantly more than the ewuivalent standard asset).. at the same time I can see the arguments of LLLL+ holders wanting to protect their holdings. -
If “XCP whales” want to trade their liquid XCP for illiquid asset names, they must have a great deal of faith in the long-term prospects of the protocol." <<
Agree with that, and also "Asset name registration leads to use. I think that’s almost a tautology, but worth stating based on the opinions expressed so far". (the charts and personal observations do seem to support that) -
Indexd + latest Bitcoin core support is something most ppl tend to agree
-
This was made when the op_return size was going to get cut down to 40 bytes prolly
-
Wouldn't disagree even it's something not immediate obvious to non-devs/exchanges. Sensible and forward thinking.
-
Yup... Depending on an unsupported fork as old as btcdrak's txindex is risky
-
quite recently actually, after that OP_return drama
-
Hmm
-
Prolly was about the fees then... Can you point me to the convo plz
-
Hey all, is this the appropriate place to ask a few development questions? Curious why Im getting some tests failed, and how did you guys go about creating the scenarios for tests? Manually inserting all the data? No matter what route I take, I continue to get 85 failed, 587 passed. Though travis-ci official repo is reporting 100% passed
-
Have you tried the slack?
-
That's where all the devs hang
-
That was my next goto, telegram was easier hop in quickly 🙂
-
Yeah, telegram isn't the best place for support unfortunately
-
-
Interesting
-
I mean, I could code up a thing
- 16 August 2018 (4 messages)
-
-
-
We need to build a spammer wall and make them pay for it😜
-
- 18 August 2018 (30 messages)
-
Endless
-
-
I'll send a CORNHOLIO to the next three addresses. Very rare. Only 666 in circulation.
-
Please send to 123456789
-
16hR1mayYyHwyN2Q6RrZ5SnBwkXQMcCW3M
-
0.17.0rc1 has been tagged: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/releases/tag/v0.17.0rc1bitcoin/bitcoin
bitcoin - Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
-
@Needmoney90 nice! plenty of CROPS on the DEX
-
-
-
it's by far the dankest
-
If I'm not too late.
-
Just peeped it. Protects against ALL? Sign me up.
-
you don't have a farm?
-
-
thanks man.
-
Big raffle going in the bitcorn chat. Raffling off one of the rarest cards in the game. ELOTE. 1/4. Details here - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WwutkHVH_fpd-f2q6qdW46zAT7kVj81NQiZmUB4TGbc/edit#gid=0Elote Raffle
Sheet1 Name, Address,# of Entries, TX Confirmation CLIT COMMANDER, 19QWXpMXeLkoEKEJv2xo9rn8wkPCyxACSX, 3, fa4394ac417ef2455db6fb8522f2fe8d6f21080f384a90eedc1e03f33c397572 Don Corn, 1DLyyj4LonwkngVKFuj2yXMHhPAYsNyJH8, 1, https:// xchain. io/ tx/ c0f09e712ab97ee94bf452822af1cb24096a72f0edbf81de...
-
-
just entered. not quite sure if i'm filling out the google doc correctly though
-
Looks good to me. Good Luck!
You have a 1/9 chance of winning at this point. -
Anyone know any info about DAIM asset (Digital Asset Management LLC) registered xcp token?
-
1EAECn7nzqMbk7FD3qa1dvbYkWj58iSV69
-
#4
-
-
Thanks!
-
15FPgnpZuNyZLVLsyB6UdFicsVvWFJXNve
-
this is #5
-
-
@ShawnLeary did you buy a raffle ticket for ELOTE yet? Support the cause.
-
buy an entery for a 1/10 chance of owning one of the rarest and dankest bitcorn classics
-
thanks!!!
- 19 August 2018 (15 messages)
-
@droplister , are you not in the "Junseth's World" telegram group? I wanted to reply to one thing you said on the last podcast in there, because the Soundcloud commenting interface is pretty limited.
-
Yeah, the Ethereum Plus Coin Dojo, lol.
-
lol, I'm not looking to punch you in the face or anything for what you said, if that's what you're worried about. :P
-
I know, can you believe that we've probably eaten some spiders in our lifetimes while sleeping. What a nightmare! One sec.
-
devs still working on highly centralized RSS scalability
-
-
-
-
Telegram stickers should be tokenized?
-
-
What about the Home Alone pack?
-
-
-
@FloridaBitcoiner needs to get on that after he gets out of jail
-
at least they give me Internet access 😉
- 20 August 2018 (35 messages)
-
lol
-
-
-
Would be nice if counterwallet had a "cancel order" option where you could just paste in the order hash you want to cancel.... instead of having to hunt for a "my open orders" list.... I'll add that to my feature list for freewallet.
-
-
-
-
yes... if you have access to the DEX interface... then you can do it the same way as you can in counterwallet... navigate to the market where the order is placed.... you should see your order listed in "My Open Orders" list... then just click the X next to the order... it will confirm you want to cancel
-
-
nope.... you only need one FULLACCESS token in one of your addresses then any addresses in your wallet should get the full benefits
-
ie... once we detect FULLACCESS in any of your wallet addresses, you should have full access...... probably just need to switch to the address which placed the order.
-
-
ahh.... no... not if the address comes from a different seed.... but... you COULD import the private key for any address
-
i've done that with a few of my addresses from my 2nd and 3rd wallets 🙂
-
-
-
of course 🙂
-
In case anyone missed it, there was a great Art On The Blockchain podcast on CP vs ETH..... TL;DR Counterparty won 🙂
-
Art On The Blockchain Battle Royale 2 : Tokens : Counterparty vs. Ethereum
Ethereum vs Counterparty Subscribe to the channel. Tommy "Pretty Boy" Nicholas "Jam Masta" James Waugh vs. Joe "Public #1" Looney "Thunderin'" Theo Goodman www.rarescrilla.com
-
what's Dante in the slammer for?
-
-
-
are you shitting me??!
-
-
-
haha
-
It's skirting the line lol
-
I love the juxtaposition of the use of the colloquial term next to the trademarked term
-
It's clearly a reference, but you aren't calling the NFT a Nifty
-
yea it is a NIFTY FUCKING KITTIE
-
Calling individual NFTs nifty as a concept is hilarious
-
Keep up the good fight
-
-
Your whole site is great man.
-
thx
- 21 August 2018 (50 messages)
-
-
-
-
Yes bitcorns is liquid
-
Liquid stays moist
-
awesome, thank you! :)
-
are you coming to the lighting day?
-
How to create NFTs on the bitcoin blockchain
What is an* NFT?
-
yes! you too? nice!!
-
yes
-
-
I have not had time to fool around with lighting
-
do you know if you can do 2 of 3 multisig
-
I know a channel is 2 of 2
-
-
ok cool
-
some frankfurt people will come too
-
-
what is the latest on the token swap to ERC?
-
RUSTBITS
-
-
lolol, sorry bro
-
any association?
-
just realized RUSTBITS is on Blockfolio too
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Good news, Blockfolio starting to pull from our DEX!!
-
No MAFIACASH or BITCORNS yet but others are appearing.
-
-
Nice!
-
-
found it, sorry i got the two confused
-
Did Age of Chains have a main token?
-
-
thank you
-
In it for the pamp
-
FYI... they are bailing to ETH.
-
Age of Rust — Dev Update #5
This was a busy month, not just in terms of development, but some significant changes in where things are going with the blockchain-gaming…
-
-
Oh wow
-
Xcp isn't dead?
-
i’ve been pinging them for over a year to add our DEC
-
they always politely say that they are workingnon it
-
Cool, nice to see blockfolio watching assets and one multi-wallet provider said they were working on XCP asset integration recently too. :)
- 22 August 2018 (13 messages)
-
lol, not until Pepe declares it
-
👍
-
I dont think there has been a discussion to change the 0.5 XCP cost, I think that is quite fair to people that burned btc during the burn, and now that you can get "free" tokens that are Aß9125ß157ß1359 then I think that is a great trade off and makes the 0.5 xcp ones even more exclusive
-
no it was always 0.5 xcp
-
I doubt coindaddy will charge 5$ when the xcp price would pump
-
Registration Service cost is $5 plus 0.5 XCP and 2 btc tx fees at current market value..... so as BTC and XCP price fluctuate, so does total order cost on coindaddy.
-
oh
-
😂😂😂
-
Do you not agree that anyone in the business of creating assets has no desire for asset registration costs to rise to an uncomfortable level, and therefore this means the price of XCP must stay low? and that if price of XCP is high activity levels taper off as a result; much like when btc fees are high.
-
-
-
In your opinion, What are the top 2 urgent matters to be addressed?
-
I’m curious what the priorities are of the xcp community leaders
- 23 August 2018 (39 messages)
-
-
-
So no top two?
-
I thought johns priority was updating to the latest bitcoin version and not a CIP?
-
Forgive me, I am less than tech savvy with github
-
-
-
to find out more about these and the other CIPs in the works, you could read the latest Counterparty update Newsletter https://counterparty.io/news/counterparty-newsletter-08-01-18/August Newsletter | Counterparty
Counterparty Protocol CIP developments and project news kickstart August with what looks like an exciting few months ahead in the community! Read for more!
-
-
-
Yes but you said “we” and right now John is the most vocal of devs with ability to make changes
-
Agree on both of these!
-
Both 10 and 13 would be great for improving xcp for gaming projects and I’m sure other uses I can’t think of that would attract new projects
-
I'm not confusing miner fee with registration fee. At $2 per asset registration there is activity. At $50 per asset registration there is less. Throughout this year we have seen that.
-
With a fixed 0.5 issuance fee in perpetuity there is incentive for the underlying XCP price not to increase for anyone using the system
-
The history of XCP has never included a dynamic pricing function for asset registration, so there wouldn't be any evidence to compare it to, but it's one of the worst market performers historically.
The issuance fee was statically reduced to a more reasonable fixed 0.5 level when the XCP: BTC ratio was *significantly* higher than it is today to come to a more agreeable 'fair' issuance cost. Since then the price in BTC has fallen (considerably) whereas the BTC price in dollar has increased to somewhat level it out. the 'low' issuance fee remains.
I don't know what a good number is nowadays, but does it not seem blindingly apparent that with asset fees dependent on the fixed cost of XCP. Realistically anyone registering assets wants the price low? or at least at a sustainable amount.
Is that so crazy of a statement? -
I was referring to Foldingcoin which I am the social media person of
-
-
-
i read it.
-
honestly was just trying to make conversation about the CIPs
-
determining a good price point without an oracle is really difficult
-
you would need to make it deterministically reproducible from chain parsing alone
-
one way could be i.e. making it dependant on the amount of XCP remaining
-
so we have a smooth curve moving forward
-
yeah
-
that's really a good thing
-
or 40 subassets
-
or pay a lot of dividends
-
however, that curve should be modelled... prolly someone with mathlab skills could propose a proper model
-
because we don't want asymptoticality on any "border"
-
but the way to go is CIP proposals
-
yeah....
-
i'm also comfortable with 0.5
-
but i'm open to being changed my mind regarding that
-
regarding investors and speculation, i think of XCP as an utility token... one with a "reasonable" value between $5-$30
-
even $50 is ok-ish price
-
below $5 it's too cheap
-
I don't think there's single actors holding the price down.. no not at all that would be a conspiracy theory
I think the collective mentality is XCP works best at a 'reasonable' price range - mostly due to its function as an anti spam fee for asset creation. A perception issue.
and simply put anybody wanting to register assets or build on XCP (which are the people who actually mostly matter) simply does not benefit from XCP price rising
. The same is not true in most other coins (say ETH for example). If ETH fixed token creation fees at 0.5 ETH, sure there might be less shitcoins but a whole lot less activity People would want to keep ETH restrained at <$5 collectively to keep its utility - 24 August 2018 (1 messages)
-
Interesting discussion. Thanks for bringing it up MG.
- 25 August 2018 (6 messages)
-
Sounds like a scam
-
How so?
-
How can I set up a Counterparty node?
-
I was replying to a scam message that has been deleted. Makes my message look odd
-
Ah no worries. Makes sense 😁
-
Running a Node | Counterparty
Installation/federated_node.md
- 27 August 2018 (14 messages)
-
-
real information about the counterparty burn address can be found in last few paragraphs here: https://counterparty.io/news/why-proof-of-burn/
-
Is this coin alive ?
-
of fcng corse man, xcp is immortal
-
-
What a bizarre perspective in the OP.
-
Yeah absolutely. Projects are active right now. (check pepevote and mafiawars -- two new counterparty based projects) the XCP DeX is working smoothly and consistently and Blockfolio just started pulling in data feeds for assets.
-
👍
-
-
-
De centralised exchange ??
-
counterwallet.io
-
this is embarrasing.... i just assumed he was a sociopath trying to do a landgrab, but now it seems clearly to me that he's just downright dumb
-
Or you can use Freewallet or Indiesquare wallet to see the Dex (decentralized exchange)
- 28 August 2018 (6 messages)
-
-
Nice work 😀
-
-
Very cool indeed. I like this physical/digital confluence. It's great for the rare asset space.
-
-
Hello!
- 29 August 2018 (5 messages)
-
-
hallo!
-
Hit me with a link and i'll fill the form out 🙂
-
-
Don't think so.
- 30 August 2018 (9 messages)
-
a marketing guy from Huobi approached me a few months ago about listing pepes on there. seems now with blockfolio adding rares maybe we can make a second push to expand markets beyond xcpdex.com
-
Cool :) Absolutely the markets can be expanded, and from there comes new participants and new energy. There's some goodness on the horizon- all about getting our community together to work towards it.
-
well the good and shitty part about decentralized projects is we are usually working perpendicularly and with little crossover. it would be interesting to form an XCP Token Consortium that basically is a Lobby on behalf of all asset holders but is independent of the XCP Core dev team itself ie a hoddlers association that approaches exchanges
-
Absolutely agreed. Decentralization is great but we it does make it hard to get collective unity. And the lack of any centralized entity sitting on premine fortunes makes it harder. do wish 1-5% of the supply were allocated towards development or that a small amount of inflation occured with those funds being diverted towards advancement of the project. In the asbence of that, ir a foundation of sorts some kind of union or consortium as you suggest seems a great approach.
-
-
Just looking back at the archives -- why not go with the 0.6 * (2,316,056/2.6*10**7) approach instead?
-
I mean what prevented that from occuring in the end, if anyone knows?
-
-
- 31 August 2018 (4 messages)
-
-
-
It’s not real to get ETH
-
Use the real to get ETH, don't use the fake and get BURN