Official Counterparty Chat

Official Counterparty Chat

Public archive of Telegram messages.

  • 2025

    • May 2025 (230)
    • Apr 2025 (83)
    • Mar 2025 (132)
    • Feb 2025 (203)
    • Jan 2025 (333)
  • 2024

    • Dec 2024 (749)
    • Nov 2024 (3574)
    • Oct 2024 (6142)
    • Sep 2024 (566)
    • Aug 2024 (651)
    • Jul 2024 (606)
    • Jun 2024 (808)
    • May 2024 (2774)
    • Apr 2024 (1312)
    • Mar 2024 (1507)
    • Feb 2024 (1942)
    • Jan 2024 (8279)
  • 2023

    • Dec 2023 (1705)
    • Nov 2023 (839)
    • Oct 2023 (882)
    • Sep 2023 (718)
    • Aug 2023 (1098)
    • Jul 2023 (856)
    • Jun 2023 (1761)
    • May 2023 (4323)
    • Apr 2023 (966)
    • Mar 2023 (900)
    • Feb 2023 (1278)
    • Jan 2023 (1230)
  • 2022

    • Dec 2022 (997)
    • Nov 2022 (1855)
    • Oct 2022 (1529)
    • Sep 2022 (2138)
    • Aug 2022 (1499)
    • Jul 2022 (2231)
    • Jun 2022 (817)
    • May 2022 (1067)
    • Apr 2022 (1402)
    • Mar 2022 (1998)
    • Feb 2022 (2064)
    • Jan 2022 (1985)
  • 2021

    • Dec 2021 (1357)
    • Nov 2021 (1990)
    • Oct 2021 (1761)
    • Sep 2021 (3183)
    • Aug 2021 (1549)
    • Jul 2021 (651)
    • Jun 2021 (903)
    • May 2021 (773)
    • Apr 2021 (1381)
    • Mar 2021 (2909)
    • Feb 2021 (1776)
    • Jan 2021 (1099)
  • 2020

    • Dec 2020 (681)
    • Nov 2020 (620)
    • Oct 2020 (412)
    • Sep 2020 (543)
    • Aug 2020 (951)
    • Jul 2020 (207)
    • Jun 2020 (121)
    • May 2020 (302)
    • Apr 2020 (178)
    • Mar 2020 (191)
    • Feb 2020 (522)
    • Jan 2020 (208)
  • 2019

    • Dec 2019 (107)
    • Nov 2019 (791)
    • Oct 2019 (574)
    • Sep 2019 (362)
    • Aug 2019 (383)
    • Jul 2019 (1852)
    • Jun 2019 (1605)
    • May 2019 (697)
    • Apr 2019 (203)
    • Mar 2019 (182)
    • Feb 2019 (221)
    • Jan 2019 (157)
  • 2018

    • Dec 2018 (152)
    • Nov 2018 (167)
    • Oct 2018 (344)
    • Sep 2018 (310)
    • Aug 2018 (480)
    • Jul 2018 (386)
    • Jun 2018 (267)
    • May 2018 (584)
    • Apr 2018 (581)
    • Mar 2018 (1277)
    • Feb 2018 (1610)
    • Jan 2018 (5725)
  • 2017

    • Dec 2017 (2655)
    • Nov 2017 (1569)
    • Oct 2017 (1610)
    • Sep 2017 (1894)
    • Aug 2017 (1216)
    • Jul 2017 (1758)
    • Jun 2017 (2)
  • 01 August 2018 (3 messages)
  • @524284385 ↶ Reply to #28608 #28655 03:13 AM, 01 Aug 2018
    Thinking this community is SAFE and encourages good convo I’d like to respond to this. In fairness a speculator might respect and appreciate a great project like Counterparty for the awesome team/community and their vision/ work. Dude could just be looking for a way to make needed income and enhanced value while simultaneously trying to support.

    And opinionated thought pieces are just that. Each day brings new insights to all seeking wisdom and understanding. Doesn’t mean someone is trumped or a cafe should sway judgement so easily.

    One can agree or disagree with moderators/devs or those in leadership roles and still be for a better future at same time.

    Adoration for other projects sometimes ends up helpless because of judgement sometimes based on quick docs. There are two sides to a coin, but who here has only one coin in their wallet?

    Some people need to “speculate” to attempt to earn money. Trade where they can to some how accumulate btc for the belief of the vision, and because they need income.

    User shouldn’t be hitting up the tele with negativity but you guys are too awesome to then support your disapproval of it with more negativity.

    Stupid eth projects might have had good charts to try and make a couple more sats to then put into great projects like Counterparty or cornholio. Or to just try and enhance much needed value. Some just tryn to make a dollar out of fifteen sense.

    Take what you want from this. Just my two cents. Counterparty is awesome. If I had a vote I’d say ban negative shit. Just be sure your own opinion is researched trustworthy enough to tap the trigger and not built on a few layers of a potentially tormenting situation for someone who could be trying to survive while also wanting others to thrive.

    Hopefully everything is crystal clear and remains beautifully enchanted. I’m sorry too. Some guys are just trying to learn as fast as they can.
  • @rare_designer #28664 03:48 PM, 01 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-01_15-48-15.jpg
  • @mafiawars_game #28665 04:35 PM, 01 Aug 2018
    https://twitter.com/mafiawars_io/status/1024693287230349312
    Mafia Wars

    The https://t.co/4smUGHfrw4 design contest https://t.co/OblERWvHJm has ended and the winners have been chosen by The Commission. Congratulations to the winners : 1st - DIRTYRAT 2nd - LAUNDROMAT 3rd - MAFIABANK #MafiaWars #Bitcoin #BTC #Counterparty #XCP #BlockchainGaming

  • 02 August 2018 (5 messages)
  • @AlexWizz1 #28671 08:07 AM, 02 Aug 2018
    any upcoming developlment or event for XCP? anyone upcoming /
  • @AlexWizz1 #28672 08:07 AM, 02 Aug 2018
    ?
  • @PutraDewaArjuna #28675 10:04 AM, 02 Aug 2018
    Dont really have any big events...and big dump again in exchange..
  • @jdogresorg #28678 02:07 PM, 02 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @PutraDewaArjuna #28680 11:34 PM, 02 Aug 2018
    I didnt sell..im just saying theres dump in the market again..
  • 03 August 2018 (5 messages)
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #28685 #28687 11:44 AM, 03 Aug 2018
    I think Christian Moss of Indiesquare was doing some interesting things in regards to atomic swaps on counterparty: See here for instance. https://blog.indiesquare.me/counterparty-and-cross-chain-token-atomic-swaps-947b6b0011c1
    Counterparty and cross chain token atomic swaps

    Overview

  • @mafiawars_game #28695 08:10 PM, 03 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-03_20-10-45.jpg
  • @goldencatpat ↶ Reply to #28689 #28696 08:30 PM, 03 Aug 2018
    /ban
  • @heunland ↶ Reply to #28695 #28700 11:33 PM, 03 Aug 2018
    can this be redeemed from rarepepewallet or is there a different wallet to redeem the mafiawars giftcards from now
  • @mafiawars_game #28701 11:34 PM, 03 Aug 2018
    You can redeem any MafiaWars giftcards on the website at mafiawars.io/redeem . If the giftcard is a RarePepe, it can also be redeemed at RarePepeWallet.com
  • 04 August 2018 (4 messages)
  • @heunland #28702 01:02 AM, 04 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @mmortal03 #28704 04:27 AM, 04 Aug 2018
    Who's buyin' the XCP dip?
  • @390887840 ↶ Reply to #28704 #28705 05:32 AM, 04 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @heunland #28706 12:48 PM, 04 Aug 2018
    Please join us for the latest updates at our Foldingcoin Public Meeting starting in 1 hour 12 min at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDKb9JCSPJ4
    FoldingCoin Public Meeting August 2018

    Come join the FoldingCoin and Curecoin communities to discuss the recent news and updates relating to the project. The Meeting Recap Notes can be found at th...

  • 05 August 2018 (8 messages)
  • @483911280 #28716 03:50 AM, 05 Aug 2018
    https://vocaroo.com/i/s0Pq2fttUcdo
    I was not aware there was any battle between Bitcorn and Mafia Wars
  • @483911280 #28717 03:54 AM, 05 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-05_03-54-21.jpg
  • @mmortal03 ↶ Reply to #28705 #28721 09:41 AM, 05 Aug 2018
    lol, but seriously, *someone* has to be buying from the people who are selling :)
  • @ShawnLeary #28727 03:15 PM, 05 Aug 2018
    yep
  • @RonaldRubber ↶ Reply to #27872 #28729 03:59 PM, 05 Aug 2018
    Can someone post link to transcription of this meeting?
  • @399218201 #28730 05:38 PM, 05 Aug 2018
    How is the developer recruitment for xcp coming?
  • @coriander7654 ↶ Reply to #28674 #28732 06:03 PM, 05 Aug 2018
    Wheres that?
  • @mightbemike ↶ Reply to #28732 #28733 06:08 PM, 05 Aug 2018
    https://counterpartytalk.org/t/counterparty-developer-meeting-06-22-2018/4865
  • 06 August 2018 (1 messages)
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #28732 #28768 11:34 AM, 06 Aug 2018
    In addition, there's active work being done on a golang implementation of counterparty for a port of counterparty to BCH.
  • 07 August 2018 (6 messages)
  • @390887840 ↶ Reply to #28768 #28788 04:33 PM, 07 Aug 2018
    Link or it didn't happen 🤣
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #28788 #28789 05:08 PM, 07 Aug 2018
    https://github.com/CounterpartyXCPC/gocoin-cash https://github.com/CounterpartyXCPC/go-xcpc
    counterpartyxcpc/gocoin-cash

    Bitcoin Cash (BCH) written in Go (golang). Contribute to counterpartyxcpc/gocoin-cash development by creating an account on GitHub.

  • @390887840 ↶ Reply to #28789 #28790 05:17 PM, 07 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @Nickst2 #28792 09:59 PM, 07 Aug 2018
    Doesn't look active
  • @nola1978 ↶ Reply to #28788 #28793 11:01 PM, 07 Aug 2018
    There is wormhole on bch which is Omni clone
  • @nola1978 #28794 11:01 PM, 07 Aug 2018
    Not sure if active
  • 08 August 2018 (10 messages)
  • @Worldchaplain ↶ Reply to #28676 #28795 12:00 AM, 08 Aug 2018
    big facts
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #28792 #28796 12:28 AM, 08 Aug 2018
    was surprised actually, I'd written the project off but
    It is active based on the GH, and based on some pics shared and discussions with the project lead. Contract was signed with the developer of gocoin and a couple of other contributors.

    in addition they had announced a partnership secured with bitmain/antminer for the dev work; and other undisclosed parties. Some exchanges also have been in touch wrt to listing and even issuing their own token on the platform (owners a BCH fanboy)- then there's the bounties for a counterparty/colored coins port to BCH by the deep pocketed holders who wish to see use cases of their chain expand or at least be able to make some marketing points. I'm not sure a port of counterparty node to go was the most sensible thing they could of started with, but it's not a bad thing to have the ecosystem & codebase expand.
  • @Worldchaplain #28797 02:02 AM, 08 Aug 2018
    I am more so for professional application and standardization. I don't care to much for the forks but we need to get with the program I do agree with that!
  • @coriander7654 #28803 03:28 PM, 08 Aug 2018
    Hey guys. XCP is one of the biggest losers on CoinMarketCap today - I don't like to post price talks, but any idea what the reason for this could be? Exchange delisting? Any other negative news? I haven't seen anytign in other channels
  • @279114941 #28804 03:35 PM, 08 Aug 2018
    I’m close to putting fresh money in
  • @279114941 #28805 03:35 PM, 08 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @lnput #28806 03:46 PM, 08 Aug 2018

    giphy (2).mp4

  • @mmortal03 ↶ Reply to #28803 #28808 08:48 PM, 08 Aug 2018
    Gotta buy the dip. Some whale is on the other side of these sells. :P Who else would be buying at these levels?
  • @Thetrueinvestor #28809 08:54 PM, 08 Aug 2018
    Buy buy buy
  • @Thetrueinvestor #28810 08:54 PM, 08 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • 09 August 2018 (70 messages)
  • @Nickst2 #28812 01:25 AM, 09 Aug 2018
    Wait for that magic $1 buy price.
  • @mmortal03 #28814 02:46 AM, 09 Aug 2018
    Wow, XCP has dropped all the way to #364 on livecoinwatch, and #341 on coinmarketcap. Completely rekt.
  • @Nickst2 #28815 03:19 AM, 09 Aug 2018
    I remember top 20 days before eth scams took over
  • @mmortal03 #28816 04:52 AM, 09 Aug 2018
    I still want to know who's buying XCP, though. 24 hour volume is $261,283.
  • @Nickst2 #28817 05:55 AM, 09 Aug 2018
    People could be selling into old bids that have been in order books for ages
  • @Thetrueinvestor #28820 02:13 PM, 09 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-09_14-13-26.jpg
  • @Thetrueinvestor #28821 02:14 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Some big whale wants to see xcp burn.... 🙄
  • @raretruck ↶ Reply to #28821 #28822 02:21 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #28816 #28824 03:35 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    it doesn't surprise me at all to know the motivation of a buyer; at what, 90% discount from Q1 this year and 96% ATH discount or something like that.. It's obscene to the point of irrationality how much the price has dropped considering no negative news.. especially when increased attention from two forks (at least one of which is offering an airdrop, which ironically might exceed the actual unit value of XCP ) and at least one of which is aiming for a high-profile exchange partnership.

    And that there are multiple active projects already running. 4 year tested project with no documented loss of user funds, small supply, deflationary model and most of actual actual utility..Real projects.

    Only down point from the POV of the markets is no regular new features added which all ADHD short term twitter/trading view traders rely on and claim dead otherwise. I'd say it's an absolute steal to be accumulating XCP at this price point.. and there are MUCH worse things to be buying.

    Any savvy investor with a nice chunk of change or group could triple, quadruple..hell 10x their funds in a heartbeat and we'd still be WAY off the highs it's been at. Cannot say the same about many others coin without the same growth potential
  • @529335952 #28825 03:42 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Maybe PK who had an amount which matches up with a 10k dump after he got banned got fed up.. What i want to know who else would be *selling* at this ridiculously low level and why. Guaranteed they're losing money in doing so.. other than impatience/needing money for hospital bills etc... verge of homelesness etc, i can only assume, somebody is trying to drive the price down- perhaps to accumulate themselves. or perhaps to offload any competitors.
  • @raretruck ↶ Reply to #28825 #28826 03:44 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    The exchanges are the biggest bag holders
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #28826 #28827 03:45 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    hm? exchanges only hold alts in custody they don't personally purchase off the users
  • @raretruck ↶ Reply to #28827 #28828 03:45 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    They sell xcp to new users
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #28828 #28829 03:46 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    That's not how it works, the XCP on exchanges is transferred by users and owned by users, not the exchanges. They'd only lose out on fees.
  • @raretruck ↶ Reply to #28829 #28830 03:48 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Are you sure? Explain address https://xchain.io/address/1AeqgtHedfA2yVXH6GiKLS2JGkfWfgyTC6
  • @529335952 #28831 03:50 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Internets too slow too load that atm, but I beleive that's bittrexxs cold wallet. Users send balance to store on the exchanges wallet, the user sells to someone else (or a user buys from someone else) and the exchange pockets a percentage fee of whatever coin is deposited/traded, that's their business model. They don't care about the underlying price.
  • @raretruck ↶ Reply to #28831 #28832 03:51 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Cool, TIL
  • @529335952 #28833 03:52 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    It just looks like they are the biggest holders because unsavvy users (of most coins) tend to store their funds on an exchange rather than control themselves in their own wallet.
  • @raretruck ↶ Reply to #28833 #28834 03:52 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Easier that way
  • @raretruck #28835 03:53 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Plus it stays "liquid"
  • @529335952 #28836 03:53 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    I guess so, but anyone that's lost money on exchanges (i lost everything more than once) is more cautious.
  • @raretruck ↶ Reply to #28836 #28837 03:54 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Anyone who knows the history knows not to keep money on an exchange
  • @529335952 #28838 03:55 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Yup. Not longer than you need to even if its convenient.
  • @raretruck #28839 03:55 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Thanks M.G. for clearing up my misconception
  • @529335952 #28840 03:55 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    No worries. 👍
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #28829 #28841 03:58 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Eh.... this mostly holds true... however, a few exchanges have held large sums of XCP in cold storage in the past.... I think a year ago polo had about 30% of the supply of XCP in their COLD wallet.
  • @jdogresorg #28842 03:58 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    https://xchain.io/address/1Co1dcFX6u1wQ8cW8mnj1DEgW7xQMEaChD
  • @jdogresorg #28843 03:58 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    moved 500K XCP to the hotwallet about 6 months ago
  • @529335952 #28844 04:00 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Not the best operating procedure but I suppose at the moment (and now owned by goldman) with the price so low covering any potential loss is hardly an issue for them.
  • @raretruck ↶ Reply to #28843 #28845 04:00 PM, 09 Aug 2018

    giphy (2).mp4

  • @raretruck #28846 04:01 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Did they participate in the burn?
  • @jdogresorg #28847 04:03 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Nope... but I believe they were one of the first exchanges to list XCP... and acquired a good portion early on...... Them having such a large portion of XCP was always a concern of the community.... that they could dump on the market at any time.
  • @jdogresorg #28848 04:04 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    https://counterparty.io/news/two-bitcoin-security-experts-to-audit-counterparty-code/
    Two Bitcoin Security Experts to Audit Counterparty Code | Counterparty

    An anonymous white hat hacker recently discovered a vulnerability in the counterpartyd code, which he exploited to steal 35,000 XCP from Poloniex, a centralized exchange on which XCP is traded. The bug was quickly fixed and the fraudulent transaction invalidated, but not before the attacker sold the stolen funds for approximately 115 BTC, which he

  • @jdogresorg #28849 04:05 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Little known fact.... XCP did actually have a vuln which allowed stealing 35K xcp early on.
  • @529335952 #28851 04:05 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Iirc sergio demain lerner and peter todd gave it the green light
  • @jdogresorg #28852 04:05 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    It pre-dates my involvement in XCP (I came in in late 2014, early 2015)
  • @529335952 #28853 04:06 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    yeah it was from my memory
  • @jdogresorg #28854 04:06 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    https://counterparty.io/news/sergio-lerner-completes-independent-security-audit/
    Sergio Lerner Completes Independent Security Audit | Counterparty

    The Counterparty team is proud to announce the completion of our first independent code audit. Focusing on the security of counterpartyd and the Counterparty protocol, this audit was completed by professional cryptographer Sergio Demian Lerner between February 24 and April 5 of this year. Sergio has discovered numerous serious bugs in Bitcoin, and is extremely

  • @raretruck ↶ Reply to #28849 #28855 04:06 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Was there a revert made to a previous state? Or did the thief get away?
  • @jdogresorg #28856 04:06 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Read the link bro... 😛
  • @jdogresorg #28857 04:06 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    white-hat... gave funds back 🙂
  • @raretruck #28858 04:06 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Ok ok lol
  • @529335952 #28859 04:06 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Yeah and it's trivial compared to the hacks ETH has seen
  • @jdogresorg #28860 04:07 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    when Counterparty Classic? 😛
  • @529335952 #28861 04:07 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    XCP has done good in the security department
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #28860 #28862 04:07 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Honestly, someone should.
  • @raretruck #28863 04:08 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Awww, a white hat so nice
  • @raretruck ↶ Reply to #28860 #28864 04:09 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Fork to ETC
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #28861 #28865 04:09 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Yep... and still have a fully funded bug bounty program to pay anyone who finds any security issues.
  • @jdogresorg #28866 04:09 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    https://counterparty.io/docs/bounties/
    Bounty Program | Counterparty

    Developers/bounties.md

  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #28867 #28869 04:17 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    I feel ya bro.... I bought at all the run-ups and peaks as well..... lost more BTC on XCP than I hold now.... as an investment vehicle XCP sucks to date.... as a platform, XCP is great.... tho would be nice to see dev pickup some more.
  • @PepeCashMillionaire ↶ Reply to #28870 #28871 04:25 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #28869 #28872 04:26 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    I reapect the work you're doing here though, a lot, including some of the early founders and contributors chased the ETH riches. You're putting in good work I just wish it would be noticed more by the markets
  • @PepeCashMillionaire ↶ Reply to #28872 #28873 04:26 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @PepeCashMillionaire ↶ Reply to #28868 #28875 04:26 PM, 09 Aug 2018

    video (1).mp4

  • @jdogresorg #28876 04:27 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    I work on XCP because I believe in it longer-term..... and I am having fun building stuff.... I am hopeful that in the future XCP will have its day.... but, either way I'm having fun building stuff and learning about crypto as I go, so its a win either way. 🙂
  • @PepeCashMillionaire ↶ Reply to #28872 #28877 04:28 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    lotta people got snekked last few months its sad but true regardless of choices really boils down to luck ie what time you got up or went to sleep while shit happened
  • @jdogresorg #28881 04:29 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    ezgif-4-e5b6a68c4a.gif
  • @PepeCashMillionaire ↶ Reply to #28879 #28882 04:30 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    xcp spot rekt was a slomo replay of all the 100x fomoer's deaths from bitmex liquidations so theoretically at least you still got big bags that could one day rebound unlike all the liquid losers that lost it all
  • @PepeCashMillionaire #28883 04:31 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    I mean xcp hit $100USD+ at pump peaks so setting high asks and walking away for a year isnt a bad idea
  • @PepeCashMillionaire #28884 04:33 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    $6K worth of anything wont really amount to much these days - unless it's a crypto hoddle that at least has a lottery ticket chance of coming back ie cashing out makes little sense after so much rekt
  • @jdogresorg #28888 04:53 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    IMO it'll bounce back.... CP dev efforts are being stepped up... lots of improvements in the works... just not highly visible.... just gotta ride out the bear market and wait for the correction 🙂
  • @RonaldRubber ↶ Reply to #28888 #28890 05:19 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Maybe we as a community can encourage cp devs to log stuff on github so we can all see what is being worked on
  • @jdogresorg #28891 06:02 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Projects fork CP for their projects and make changes which can then be merged back into CP via pull requests.... just because your not seeing work being publicly being done in the github repo does not mean that there is not new features being worked on and tested by others privately for their own projects.
  • @jdogresorg #28892 06:04 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    At this point CP has PRs which we need to get reviewed/tested/merged and rolled out to production... MPMA and indexd.... and AFAIK work is being done on that front.
  • @mmortal03 ↶ Reply to #28825 #28893 09:06 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    It could be an OG XCP holder, so, not losing money
  • @RonaldRubber #28894 09:32 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Would still be losing money against BTC though
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #28894 #28898 09:38 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    Yeah
  • @mmortal03 ↶ Reply to #28896 #28899 10:24 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    lol, I wish I were an OG XCP hodler. :)
  • @mmortal03 #28900 10:25 PM, 09 Aug 2018
    I *was* around back then on BitcoinTalk, though.
  • 10 August 2018 (7 messages)
  • @390887840 ↶ Reply to #28793 #28903 03:25 AM, 10 Aug 2018

    giphy (2).mp4

  • @mmortal03 ↶ Reply to #28903 #28904 05:41 AM, 10 Aug 2018
    lol
  • @theogoodman #28906 05:34 PM, 10 Aug 2018
    http://theos.gallery/

    photo_2018-08-10_17-34-35.jpg
  • @theogoodman #28907 05:34 PM, 10 Aug 2018
    powered by counterparty
  • @PepeCashMillionaire ↶ Reply to #28906 #28908 06:38 PM, 10 Aug 2018

    giphy (2).mp4

  • @theogoodman #28909 07:15 PM, 10 Aug 2018
    👍
  • @mmortal03 ↶ Reply to #28906 #28910 10:44 PM, 10 Aug 2018
    Damn, definitely The OG 'oodman right there.
  • 12 August 2018 (3 messages)
  • @mmortal03 #28916 04:14 PM, 12 Aug 2018
    https://twitter.com/Excellion/status/1028426579158884352
    Samson Mow

    According to the Bitmain pre-IPO investor deck, they sold most of their #Bitcoin for #Bcash. At $900/BCH, they've bled half a billion in the last 3 months. If Bitcoin Core devs didn't disclose the Bcash vulnerability, it could've wiped a billion dollars off their balance sheets.

  • @Thetrueinvestor #28917 08:06 PM, 12 Aug 2018
    https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1028190371719786496?s=21
    CZ 🔶 Binance

    We don't list shitcoins even if they pay 400 or 4,000 BTC. ETH/NEO/XRP/EOS/XMR/LTC/more listed with no fee. Question is not “how much does Binance charge to list?” but “is my coin good enough?” It’s not the fee, it's your project! Focus on your own project!

  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #28916 #28918 09:03 PM, 12 Aug 2018
    Guess that's why Bitmain invested in counterparty for BCH. The more relevance that chain gets the better for them.
  • 13 August 2018 (6 messages)
  • @pairmike #28922 06:44 AM, 13 Aug 2018
    https://steemit.com/gaming/@pairmike/gamer-alert-what-if-steem-monsters-and-spells-of-genesis-partnered-20180813t063626653z-post
    Gamer Alert: What if Steem Monsters and Spells Of Genesis Partnered ? — Steemit

    Many years ago, I became an ICO investor into the Spells Of Genesis (SOG) project as a partner. Spells Of Genesis… by pairmike

  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #28925 #28926 04:21 PM, 13 Aug 2018
    Yes.
  • @mmortal03 #28927 09:20 PM, 13 Aug 2018
    Pepe isn't buying the XCP dip hard enough.
  • @mmortal03 ↶ Reply to #28929 #28932 10:41 PM, 13 Aug 2018
    Technically, $31,060 volume
  • @mmortal03 #28933 10:41 PM, 13 Aug 2018
    24h
  • @mmortal03 #28934 10:50 PM, 13 Aug 2018
    I read things like the following, and how absurd their token is, but they have more volume than XCP: https://www.coindesk.com/ico-founders-will-wait-7-more-years-for-crypto-paydays/
    In Rare Decision, ICO Founders Will Delay Crypto Paydays – For a Decade

    Nebulas raised $60 million in an ICO in December, but in order to help its team focus on completing its tech, it's extending its team's token lockup.

  • 14 August 2018 (5 messages)
  • @529335952 #28942 10:46 PM, 14 Aug 2018
    Cross posting this here
  • @529335952 #28943 10:46 PM, 14 Aug 2018
    Curious why Im getting some tests failed, and how did you guys go about creating the scenarios for tests? Manually inserting all the data?
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #28943 #28944 10:47 PM, 14 Aug 2018
    where was that?
  • @529335952 #28945 10:48 PM, 14 Aug 2018
    Counterparty XCP TG group
  • @jdogresorg ↶ Reply to #28943 #28947 11:48 PM, 14 Aug 2018
    Prolly should ask dev/support questions on slack.counterparty.io or counterpartytalk.org
  • 15 August 2018 (116 messages)
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #28947 #28948 12:03 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    I did forward them to the slack, but wasn't sure how active it is. so I expect they'll post there
  • @jdogresorg #28949 12:40 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @104473096 #28958 06:44 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    "Named assets with 'A'" are consensus affecting tho
  • @104473096 #28960 06:44 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    "Here are relatively trivial changes we can have in two weeks™:"
  • @104473096 #28961 06:44 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    A stuff isn't trivial
  • @104473096 #28962 06:45 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    you can't have "A" assets using the current encoding without stepping over numeric asset space
  • @104473096 #28963 06:45 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    you could kludge it in with some stuff like the proposed XA...
  • @104473096 #28964 06:45 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    but that's just a kludge
  • @104473096 #28965 06:46 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    and reduces all A and X assets to 11 letters
  • @104473096 #28967 06:47 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    yup.... the encoding sucks....
  • @104473096 #28968 06:47 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    it's basically "assign a number to each letter and sum/multiply them"
  • @104473096 #28969 06:47 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    and then A got assigned 0
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #28970 #28971 06:48 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    check how numerics are verified in the code
  • @104473096 #28972 06:48 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    it's all over the place
  • @104473096 #28975 06:49 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    even one collision is hard to "identify"
  • @104473096 #28977 06:49 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    yup
  • @104473096 #28978 06:49 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    numerics otoh
  • @104473096 #28979 06:49 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    isNumeric = asset.id > FIRST_NUMERIC
  • @104473096 #28981 06:50 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    (example code, not real code)
  • @104473096 #28982 06:50 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    cehcking for numerics is just checking that the idea is greater than some threshold
  • @104473096 #28983 06:50 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    which seems witty until it doesn't
  • @104473096 #28994 06:58 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    just as a suggestion, i invite you to make that "simple" change to the code, and run the test suite afterwards
  • @104473096 #28998 06:59 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    LLL isn't that problematic because it is on the low asset space, purposefully reserved
  • @104473096 #28999 07:00 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    my most sought after change is structural: make xcp compatible with 0.16.2
  • @104473096 #29000 07:00 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    0.13 is a liability
  • @104473096 #29001 07:00 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    there's a stumbling roadblock on indexd we're trying to get fixed
  • @104473096 #29002 07:00 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    (namely, reorgs aren't handled atm)
  • @104473096 #29004 07:01 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    feature wise?
  • @104473096 #29005 07:01 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    sendall is pretty easy
  • @104473096 #29007 07:01 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    and needed
  • @104473096 #29008 07:02 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    i mean, who doesn't want to move their whole portfolio at once
  • @104473096 #29009 07:02 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    i.e. for trezor storage
  • @104473096 #29011 07:03 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    yup
  • @104473096 #29012 07:03 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    the bitwise flags
  • @104473096 #29014 07:04 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    it's completely on the same line of development "options" should be....
  • @104473096 #29015 07:04 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    in fact, using that change we could implement easily the "anyone can..." features you're asking
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #29017 #29019 07:07 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    yup.... initial idea was to make the code less "prone" to manipulation by coercing the only active option.... bitwise manipulation was meant to be introduced when a new feature required it
  • @104473096 #29022 07:08 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    some of the other more "deep" changes we're experimenting with internally are pair fees (markets where the issuer of an asset can create a fee for that specific market)
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #29021 #29024 07:08 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    chris is in
  • @104473096 #29029 07:09 AM, 15 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-15_07-09-45.jpg
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #29026 #29030 07:09 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    it's internal... you can do whatever internal test you want
  • @104473096 #29031 07:10 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    that's the beauty of OSS
  • @104473096 #29032 07:10 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    before cip proposal, you can have a regtest running all your code np
  • @104473096 #29033 07:10 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    with 0.16.2
  • @104473096 #29035 07:10 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    (0.13 didn't have proper regtest support)
  • @104473096 #29037 07:10 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    on time my friend
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #29038 #29039 07:11 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    same here
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #29005 #29041 07:11 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    😐
  • @104473096 #29043 07:12 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    but i would definitively focus all efforts on modern structural parts (bitcoin 0.16.2)
  • @104473096 #29044 07:12 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    sendall? no way
  • @104473096 #29046 07:12 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    doesn't makes any sense limiting it
  • @104473096 #29049 07:14 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    dividends is another thing.... if it wasn't fee marked it could lead to spam
  • @104473096 #29050 07:14 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    sendall, if you do it you're pretty much fucked up
  • @104473096 #29051 07:14 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    can't spam constantly from an address that got emptied
  • @104473096 #29052 07:15 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    the message itself is its own anti-spam mechanism
  • @104473096 #29055 07:18 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    totally
  • @104473096 #29060 07:20 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    the spam prevention is just there to prevent the case where a bot could fill the backlog with the same message over an over without an incumbent repercussion
  • @104473096 #29061 07:20 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    in this case, loss of xcp makes it hard "financially"
  • @104473096 #29062 07:20 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    sending has been abused
  • @104473096 #29063 07:20 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    but has a more punishing "fee" in the BTC fee
  • @104473096 #29064 07:21 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    dividends have so much bandwidth per btc fee that an additional xcp fee prevents abuse
  • @104473096 #29065 07:22 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    same was talked for MPMA, but the conclusion was to limit MPMA sends to 1 send per block from a given source address iirc... don't remember if this was set on stone or if it was implemented
  • @104473096 #29068 07:22 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    yes, and no
  • @104473096 #29069 07:22 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    the question you should ask yourself is this...
  • @104473096 #29071 07:23 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    "Can i abuse sendall over and over to fill the database with spam?"
  • @104473096 #29072 07:23 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    that leads to 2 conclusions
  • @104473096 #29073 07:24 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    1) you cannot sendall to the same address
  • @104473096 #29074 07:24 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    2) an address cannot sendall multiple times on the same block
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #29075 #29077 07:25 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    the limited resource on cp is more HDD ops
  • @104473096 #29079 07:25 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    that's the bandwidth hog in fact
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #29078 #29080 07:25 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    no
  • @104473096 #29081 07:26 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    the trashing the HDD cache gets from an OP like dividends is severe.... even moreso if i emit multiple dividends
  • @104473096 #29082 07:26 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    however, an address that does a sendall has nothing to send after it
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #29073 #29086 07:27 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    this
  • @104473096 #29087 07:27 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    that's why you have unit tests to cover those bases
  • @104473096 #29090 07:27 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    a formal cip would state that sendall to the same address can't work
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #29088 #29091 07:28 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    it's not the same address for CP
  • @104473096 #29093 07:28 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    you could establish that (3) you cannot sendall unconfirmed funds
  • @104473096 #29094 07:28 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    case covered
  • @104473096 #29097 07:29 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    hmmm
  • @104473096 #29098 07:29 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    what if the address doesn't has XCP?
  • @104473096 #29101 07:30 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    dunno
  • @104473096 #29103 07:30 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    same here
  • @104473096 #29104 07:30 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    but it got to follow some logic principles too
  • @104473096 #29105 07:30 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    we could just markup everything with gas fees
  • @104473096 #29107 07:31 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    and wham! drive adoption... not!
  • @104473096 #29109 07:31 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    remember that there's already the BTC fee
  • @104473096 #29111 07:31 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    and most users are a little confused by that
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #29110 #29113 07:32 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    LLL would make adoption rise? maybe... there's stuff with more impact though
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #29112 #29114 07:32 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    yup
  • @104473096 #29119 07:33 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    hmmm....
  • @104473096 #29120 07:34 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    welp... gonna take a nap, need to be fully functioning in about 4 hours
  • @354417957 #29145 09:49 AM, 15 Aug 2018
    "Dex-like Features:
    - Decentralized Asset Sales (transfer ownership atomically)
    "

    Yess! Want this! 👌
  • @529335952 #29148 12:00 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    Wow, a a lot to catch up on.
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #28957 #29153 04:22 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    Great post. What are the major pitfalls roadblocking LLL assets (if any) at this stage?
  • @jdogresorg #29154 04:22 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    consensus
  • @jdogresorg #29155 04:22 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    https://counterpartytalk.org/t/cip-proposal-three-letter-asset-names/3944
    CIP Proposal - Three Letter Asset Names

    This thread is about a potential CIP that would allow for 3 letter asset names. I have some code that I think covers most of it here, for review and feedback: Result: 3 letter asset names become valid. 3 letter asset names require 10 XCP to issue. Todos: Testnet tx fixture for parsing.

  • @529335952 #29156 04:22 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    Political, as in disagreement between users as to whether LlL assets are a good idea?
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29155 #29157 04:23 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    Thanks. reading through.
  • @529335952 #29158 04:36 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    I think the 'can lead to scams' argument has a point on paper but would be fairly flimsy in actuality and is a bit overblown. Other platforms have managed fine. Scams can and will happen regardless.

    Participants can and will do some level of due diligence, I absolutely believe this landscape (dex in particular, where a user would have to acquire btc and xcp they have already passed a certain threshold of capability to not get suddenly send their life savings to an evil boogeyman LLL the second it pops up. I really doubt anyone is easily fooled buying 'USD' instead of 'XUSD' or 'DOLLAR'..

    Although at the same time I can't see a massive reason to have USD if there is already XUSD, other than invigorating the space and encouraging registration (assuming LLL's would be significantly more than the ewuivalent standard asset).. at the same time I can see the arguments of LLLL+ holders wanting to protect their holdings.
  • @529335952 #29159 04:36 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    If “XCP whales” want to trade their liquid XCP for illiquid asset names, they must have a great deal of faith in the long-term prospects of the protocol." <<

    Agree with that, and also "Asset name registration leads to use. I think that’s almost a tautology, but worth stating based on the opinions expressed so far". (the charts and personal observations do seem to support that)
  • @104473096 #29163 04:43 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    Indexd + latest Bitcoin core support is something most ppl tend to agree
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #29162 #29164 04:43 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    This was made when the op_return size was going to get cut down to 40 bytes prolly
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29163 #29165 04:44 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    Wouldn't disagree even it's something not immediate obvious to non-devs/exchanges. Sensible and forward thinking.
  • @104473096 #29166 04:45 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    Yup... Depending on an unsupported fork as old as btcdrak's txindex is risky
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29164 #29167 04:45 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    quite recently actually, after that OP_return drama
  • @104473096 #29168 04:46 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    Hmm
  • @104473096 #29169 04:46 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    Prolly was about the fees then... Can you point me to the convo plz
  • @MattFnSmith #29174 05:20 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    Hey all, is this the appropriate place to ask a few development questions? Curious why Im getting some tests failed, and how did you guys go about creating the scenarios for tests? Manually inserting all the data? No matter what route I take, I continue to get 85 failed, 587 passed. Though travis-ci official repo is reporting 100% passed
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #29174 #29175 05:24 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    Have you tried the slack?
  • @Needmoney90 #29176 05:24 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    That's where all the devs hang
  • @MattFnSmith #29177 05:25 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    That was my next goto, telegram was easier hop in quickly 🙂
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #29177 #29178 06:05 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    Yeah, telegram isn't the best place for support unfortunately
  • @raretruck ↶ Reply to #28954 #29179 08:07 PM, 15 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-15_20-07-31.jpg
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #28956 #29181 10:06 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    Interesting
  • @Needmoney90 #29182 10:06 PM, 15 Aug 2018
    I mean, I could code up a thing
  • 16 August 2018 (4 messages)
  • @jdogresorg #29224 01:23 PM, 16 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @heunland #29225 02:01 PM, 16 Aug 2018
    Scammer spamming getting really annoying
  • @jdogresorg #29226 02:50 PM, 16 Aug 2018
    We need to build a spammer wall and make them pay for it😜
  • @jdogresorg #29227 02:50 PM, 16 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • 18 August 2018 (30 messages)
  • @ShawnLeary #29244 12:59 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    Endless
  • @483911280 #29246 04:24 AM, 18 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-18_04-24-10.jpg
  • @483911280 #29247 04:24 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    I'll send a CORNHOLIO to the next three addresses. Very rare. Only 666 in circulation.
  • @MachineUser #29250 04:26 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    Please send to 123456789
  • @pepe_van_winkle #29251 04:32 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    16hR1mayYyHwyN2Q6RrZ5SnBwkXQMcCW3M
  • @mmortal03 #29254 04:33 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    0.17.0rc1 has been tagged: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/releases/tag/v0.17.0rc1
    bitcoin/bitcoin

    bitcoin - Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

  • @pepe_van_winkle #29256 04:42 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    @Needmoney90 nice! plenty of CROPS on the DEX
  • @483911280 ↶ Reply to #29251 #29257 04:59 AM, 18 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-18_04-59-06.jpg
  • @483911280 ↶ Reply to #29252 #29258 05:00 AM, 18 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-18_05-00-09.jpg
  • @483911280 ↶ Reply to #29253 #29260 05:00 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    it's by far the dankest
  • @529335952 #29261 05:00 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    If I'm not too late.
  • @529335952 #29262 05:01 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    Just peeped it. Protects against ALL? Sign me up.
  • @483911280 ↶ Reply to #29261 #29263 05:01 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    you don't have a farm?
  • @483911280 ↶ Reply to #29259 #29264 05:02 AM, 18 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-18_05-02-03.jpg
  • @pepe_van_winkle ↶ Reply to #29257 #29265 05:02 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    thanks man.
  • @483911280 #29267 05:05 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    Big raffle going in the bitcorn chat. Raffling off one of the rarest cards in the game. ELOTE. 1/4. Details here - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WwutkHVH_fpd-f2q6qdW46zAT7kVj81NQiZmUB4TGbc/edit#gid=0
    Elote Raffle

    Sheet1 Name, Address,# of Entries, TX Confirmation CLIT COMMANDER, 19QWXpMXeLkoEKEJv2xo9rn8wkPCyxACSX, 3, fa4394ac417ef2455db6fb8522f2fe8d6f21080f384a90eedc1e03f33c397572 Don Corn, 1DLyyj4LonwkngVKFuj2yXMHhPAYsNyJH8, 1, https:// xchain. io/ tx/ c0f09e712ab97ee94bf452822af1cb24096a72f0edbf81de...

  • @483911280 #29268 05:05 AM, 18 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-18_05-05-59.jpg
  • @pepe_van_winkle ↶ Reply to #29267 #29271 05:36 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    just entered. not quite sure if i'm filling out the google doc correctly though
  • @483911280 ↶ Reply to #29271 #29272 05:38 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    Looks good to me. Good Luck!

    You have a 1/9 chance of winning at this point.
  • @529335952 #29273 06:19 AM, 18 Aug 2018
    Anyone know any info about DAIM asset (Digital Asset Management LLC) registered xcp token?
  • @tweetious ↶ Reply to #29247 #29278 02:45 PM, 18 Aug 2018
    1EAECn7nzqMbk7FD3qa1dvbYkWj58iSV69
  • @483911280 ↶ Reply to #29278 #29279 04:50 PM, 18 Aug 2018
    #4
  • @483911280 #29280 04:51 PM, 18 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-18_16-51-39.jpg
  • @tweetious ↶ Reply to #29280 #29281 05:08 PM, 18 Aug 2018
    Thanks!
  • @ShawnLeary ↶ Reply to #29247 #29282 07:39 PM, 18 Aug 2018
    15FPgnpZuNyZLVLsyB6UdFicsVvWFJXNve
  • @483911280 ↶ Reply to #29282 #29283 07:48 PM, 18 Aug 2018
    this is #5
  • @483911280 #29284 07:48 PM, 18 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-18_19-48-18.jpg
  • @483911280 #29285 07:48 PM, 18 Aug 2018
    @ShawnLeary did you buy a raffle ticket for ELOTE yet? Support the cause.
  • @483911280 #29286 07:49 PM, 18 Aug 2018
    buy an entery for a 1/10 chance of owning one of the rarest and dankest bitcorn classics
  • @ShawnLeary ↶ Reply to #29283 #29287 07:50 PM, 18 Aug 2018
    thanks!!!
  • 19 August 2018 (15 messages)
  • @mmortal03 #29290 02:34 AM, 19 Aug 2018
    @droplister , are you not in the "Junseth's World" telegram group? I wanted to reply to one thing you said on the last podcast in there, because the Soundcloud commenting interface is pretty limited.
  • @mmortal03 ↶ Reply to #29292 #29293 02:36 AM, 19 Aug 2018
    Yeah, the Ethereum Plus Coin Dojo, lol.
  • @mmortal03 #29295 02:37 AM, 19 Aug 2018
    lol, I'm not looking to punch you in the face or anything for what you said, if that's what you're worried about. :P
  • @mmortal03 #29297 02:44 AM, 19 Aug 2018
    I know, can you believe that we've probably eaten some spiders in our lifetimes while sleeping. What a nightmare! One sec.
  • @ShaunApps ↶ Reply to #29292 #29298 02:55 AM, 19 Aug 2018
    devs still working on highly centralized RSS scalability
  • @ShawnLeary #29299 02:56 AM, 19 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @MachineUser #29302 03:02 AM, 19 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @ShaunApps #29303 03:04 AM, 19 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @MachineUser #29306 03:07 AM, 19 Aug 2018
    Telegram stickers should be tokenized?
  • @MachineUser #29308 03:07 AM, 19 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @MachineUser #29310 03:10 AM, 19 Aug 2018
    What about the Home Alone pack?
  • @MachineUser #29311 03:10 AM, 19 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @MachineUser #29313 03:11 AM, 19 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @mmortal03 ↶ Reply to #29298 #29314 03:17 AM, 19 Aug 2018
    @FloridaBitcoiner needs to get on that after he gets out of jail
  • @FloridaBitcoiner ↶ Reply to #29315 #29317 10:05 PM, 19 Aug 2018
    at least they give me Internet access 😉
  • 20 August 2018 (35 messages)
  • @mmortal03 ↶ Reply to #29317 #29320 02:03 AM, 20 Aug 2018
    lol
  • @manksi #29322 04:14 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    how do i cancel an open order on the dex through counterwallet? o,o
  • @manksi #29323 04:15 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    clicking on "markets" -> "open orders" doesnt list my orders
  • @jdogresorg #29324 04:17 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    Would be nice if counterwallet had a "cancel order" option where you could just paste in the order hash you want to cancel.... instead of having to hunt for a "my open orders" list.... I'll add that to my feature list for freewallet.
  • @manksi #29325 04:17 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    cool
  • @manksi #29326 04:17 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    can you already cancel orders through freewallet?
  • @manksi #29327 04:19 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    if the counterwallet "my open orders" list only would work lol
  • @jdogresorg #29328 04:19 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    yes... if you have access to the DEX interface... then you can do it the same way as you can in counterwallet... navigate to the market where the order is placed.... you should see your order listed in "My Open Orders" list... then just click the X next to the order... it will confirm you want to cancel
  • @manksi #29329 04:20 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    i see. the prob is i have the fullaccess token on a different address. guess i gotta send it around 😂
  • @jdogresorg #29330 04:21 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    nope.... you only need one FULLACCESS token in one of your addresses then any addresses in your wallet should get the full benefits
  • @jdogresorg #29331 04:21 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    ie... once we detect FULLACCESS in any of your wallet addresses, you should have full access...... probably just need to switch to the address which placed the order.
  • @manksi #29332 04:21 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    even if the address comes from a different seed?
  • @jdogresorg #29333 04:22 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    ahh.... no... not if the address comes from a different seed.... but... you COULD import the private key for any address
  • @jdogresorg #29334 04:22 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    i've done that with a few of my addresses from my 2nd and 3rd wallets 🙂
  • @manksi #29335 04:22 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    ah i see
  • @manksi #29336 04:22 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    cool thanks! :)
  • @jdogresorg #29337 04:22 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    of course 🙂
  • @jdogresorg #29338 04:55 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    In case anyone missed it, there was a great Art On The Blockchain podcast on CP vs ETH..... TL;DR Counterparty won 🙂
  • @jdogresorg #29339 04:55 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    https://youtu.be/-xpoyLfuizc
    Art On The Blockchain Battle Royale 2 : Tokens : Counterparty vs. Ethereum

    Ethereum vs Counterparty Subscribe to the channel. Tommy "Pretty Boy" Nicholas "Jam Masta" James Waugh vs. Joe "Public #1" Looney "Thunderin'" Theo Goodman www.rarescrilla.com

  • @PepeCashMillionaire ↶ Reply to #29314 #29340 06:28 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    what's Dante in the slammer for?
  • @junseth #29341 06:28 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    he got caught trying to pop Tommy Robinson out of jail
  • @junseth #29342 06:28 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    Seems like he succeeded though
  • @PepeCashMillionaire ↶ Reply to #29341 #29343 06:30 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    are you shitting me??!
  • @PepeCashMillionaire #29344 06:30 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @theogoodman #29345 06:37 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    http://theos.gallery/2018/08/20/nifty-fucking-kitties/
  • @theogoodman #29347 06:48 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    haha
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #29345 #29348 06:52 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    It's skirting the line lol
  • @Needmoney90 #29349 06:52 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    I love the juxtaposition of the use of the colloquial term next to the trademarked term
  • @Needmoney90 #29350 06:52 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    It's clearly a reference, but you aren't calling the NFT a Nifty
  • @theogoodman #29351 06:53 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    yea it is a NIFTY FUCKING KITTIE
  • @Needmoney90 #29352 07:00 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    Calling individual NFTs nifty as a concept is hilarious
  • @Needmoney90 #29353 07:00 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    Keep up the good fight
  • @theogoodman #29354 07:00 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @nathansonic ↶ Reply to #29345 #29355 07:15 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    Your whole site is great man.
  • @theogoodman #29356 07:15 PM, 20 Aug 2018
    thx
  • 21 August 2018 (50 messages)
  • @manksi #29358 01:13 AM, 21 Aug 2018
    hmm somehow i cannot see my sell order under "my open orders"
  • @manksi #29359 01:13 AM, 21 Aug 2018
    is there a way to double check the corresponding address to the sell order?
  • @heunland #29360 01:25 AM, 21 Aug 2018
    you can see orders on xchain.io for any address
  • @theogoodman #29362 07:25 AM, 21 Aug 2018
    Yes bitcorns is liquid
  • @500771309 #29363 11:49 AM, 21 Aug 2018
    Liquid stays moist
  • @manksi ↶ Reply to #29360 #29364 12:06 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    awesome, thank you! :)
  • @theogoodman ↶ Reply to #29364 #29365 12:55 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    are you coming to the lighting day?
  • @theogoodman #29366 12:55 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    https://medium.com/@theog__/how-to-create-nfts-on-the-bitcoin-blockchain-997024c09c26
    How to create NFTs on the bitcoin blockchain

    What is an* NFT?

  • @manksi ↶ Reply to #29365 #29367 12:59 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    yes! you too? nice!!
  • @theogoodman #29368 12:59 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    yes
  • @manksi #29369 12:59 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    awesome :)
  • @theogoodman #29370 12:59 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    I have not had time to fool around with lighting
  • @theogoodman #29371 12:59 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    do you know if you can do 2 of 3 multisig
  • @theogoodman #29372 12:59 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    I know a channel is 2 of 2
  • @manksi #29373 12:59 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    no worries i am quite a lightning noob too
  • @theogoodman #29374 12:59 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    ok cool
  • @theogoodman #29375 01:00 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    some frankfurt people will come too
  • @manksi #29376 01:00 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    its a great event, totally recommend it
  • @ShawnLeary ↶ Reply to #29364 #29377 01:02 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    what is the latest on the token swap to ERC?
  • @ShawnLeary #29378 01:10 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    RUSTBITS
  • @manksi #29379 01:13 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    hey i am not age of rust ^.^
  • @ShawnLeary #29380 01:15 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    lolol, sorry bro
  • @ShawnLeary #29381 01:15 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    any association?
  • @ShawnLeary #29382 01:15 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    just realized RUSTBITS is on Blockfolio too
  • @manksi #29383 01:15 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    haha no worries. no
  • @heunland #29384 01:18 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    I suggest you ask in their discord or telegram channel, where they post progress about the migration plans.
  • @ShawnLeary #29385 01:19 PM, 21 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-21_13-19-08.jpg
  • @ShawnLeary #29386 01:19 PM, 21 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-21_13-19-08.jpg
  • @ShawnLeary #29387 01:19 PM, 21 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-21_13-19-08.jpg
  • @ShawnLeary #29388 01:19 PM, 21 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-21_13-19-08.jpg
  • @ShawnLeary #29389 01:19 PM, 21 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-21_13-19-08.jpg
  • @ShawnLeary #29390 01:19 PM, 21 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-21_13-19-08.jpg
  • @ShawnLeary #29391 01:19 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    Good news, Blockfolio starting to pull from our DEX!!
  • @ShawnLeary #29392 01:19 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    No MAFIACASH or BITCORNS yet but others are appearing.
  • @heunland #29393 01:20 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    lots of PEPEs 😂
  • @raretruck ↶ Reply to #29391 #29394 02:05 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    Nice!
  • @ShawnLeary #29395 02:13 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    https://www.ageofrust.games/rustbits/
  • @ShawnLeary #29396 02:13 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    found it, sorry i got the two confused
  • @ShawnLeary ↶ Reply to #29379 #29397 02:14 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    Did Age of Chains have a main token?
  • @manksi #29398 03:22 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    no currency token, we have only sold cards so far
  • @ShawnLeary ↶ Reply to #29398 #29400 03:49 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    thank you
  • @nathansonic ↶ Reply to #29395 #29401 04:39 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    In it for the pamp
  • @jdogresorg #29402 04:40 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    FYI... they are bailing to ETH.
  • @jdogresorg #29403 04:41 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    https://medium.com/age-of-rust-game/april-dev-update-4b4b2d651650
    Age of Rust — Dev Update #5

    This was a busy month, not just in terms of development, but some significant changes in where things are going with the blockchain-gaming…

  • @heunland #29404 04:59 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    Yeah a mayor disappointment for me they decided to go that route 😕
  • @Needmoney90 ↶ Reply to #29391 #29405 06:00 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    Oh wow
  • @Needmoney90 #29406 06:00 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    Xcp isn't dead?
  • @ShawnLeary #29407 06:17 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    i’ve been pinging them for over a year to add our DEC
  • @ShawnLeary #29408 06:17 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    they always politely say that they are workingnon it
  • @529335952 #29409 11:27 PM, 21 Aug 2018
    Cool, nice to see blockfolio watching assets and one multi-wallet provider said they were working on XCP asset integration recently too. :)
  • 22 August 2018 (13 messages)
  • @mmortal03 ↶ Reply to #29406 #29411 06:41 AM, 22 Aug 2018
    lol, not until Pepe declares it
  • @theogoodman ↶ Reply to #29410 #29412 07:01 AM, 22 Aug 2018
    👍
  • @theogoodman ↶ Reply to #29413 #29415 09:18 AM, 22 Aug 2018
    I dont think there has been a discussion to change the 0.5 XCP cost, I think that is quite fair to people that burned btc during the burn, and now that you can get "free" tokens that are Aß9125ß157ß1359 then I think that is a great trade off and makes the 0.5 xcp ones even more exclusive
  • @theogoodman ↶ Reply to #29416 #29417 11:00 AM, 22 Aug 2018
    no it was always 0.5 xcp
  • @theogoodman #29418 11:01 AM, 22 Aug 2018
    I doubt coindaddy will charge 5$ when the xcp price would pump
  • @jdogresorg #29419 11:52 AM, 22 Aug 2018
    Registration Service cost is $5 plus 0.5 XCP and 2 btc tx fees at current market value..... so as BTC and XCP price fluctuate, so does total order cost on coindaddy.
  • @theogoodman #29423 12:20 PM, 22 Aug 2018
    oh
  • @theogoodman #29426 12:24 PM, 22 Aug 2018
    😂😂😂
  • @529335952 #29438 08:15 PM, 22 Aug 2018
    Do you not agree that anyone in the business of creating assets has no desire for asset registration costs to rise to an uncomfortable level, and therefore this means the price of XCP must stay low? and that if price of XCP is high activity levels taper off as a result; much like when btc fees are high.
  • @heunland #29441 11:20 PM, 22 Aug 2018
    You are confusing miners fee with asset registration fee now
  • @heunland #29442 11:21 PM, 22 Aug 2018
    If the registration fee on XCP ever becomes an issue I am sure it will be addressed then. There are more urgent matters to address now IMHO
  • @RonaldRubber ↶ Reply to #29442 #29443 11:48 PM, 22 Aug 2018
    In your opinion, What are the top 2 urgent matters to be addressed?
  • @RonaldRubber #29444 11:48 PM, 22 Aug 2018
    I’m curious what the priorities are of the xcp community leaders
  • 23 August 2018 (39 messages)
  • @heunland #29445 12:00 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    Priorities are to get the already in progress CIPS done
  • @heunland #29446 12:00 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    and we are already working on that.
  • @RonaldRubber #29447 12:07 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    So no top two?
  • @RonaldRubber #29448 12:07 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    I thought johns priority was updating to the latest bitcoin version and not a CIP?
  • @RonaldRubber #29449 12:07 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    Forgive me, I am less than tech savvy with github
  • @heunland #29450 12:21 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    CIP 10 – Multi-Peer Multi-Asset Sends (MPMA)
  • @heunland #29451 12:21 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    CIP 13 – Multiparty Counterparty Aggregate Transactions (MCAT)
  • @heunland #29452 12:22 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    to find out more about these and the other CIPs in the works, you could read the latest Counterparty update Newsletter https://counterparty.io/news/counterparty-newsletter-08-01-18/
    August Newsletter | Counterparty

    Counterparty Protocol CIP developments and project news kickstart August with what looks like an exciting few months ahead in the community! Read for more!

  • @heunland #29453 12:23 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    BTW John is not the only one working on Counterparty dev
  • @heunland #29454 12:23 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    and you asked me about my priorities, not John´s
  • @RonaldRubber ↶ Reply to #29454 #29455 12:39 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    Yes but you said “we” and right now John is the most vocal of devs with ability to make changes
  • @RonaldRubber ↶ Reply to #29451 #29456 12:40 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    Agree on both of these!
  • @RonaldRubber #29457 12:41 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    Both 10 and 13 would be great for improving xcp for gaming projects and I’m sure other uses I can’t think of that would attract new projects
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29441 #29458 12:41 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    I'm not confusing miner fee with registration fee. At $2 per asset registration there is activity. At $50 per asset registration there is less. Throughout this year we have seen that.
  • @529335952 #29459 12:44 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    With a fixed 0.5 issuance fee in perpetuity there is incentive for the underlying XCP price not to increase for anyone using the system
  • @529335952 #29462 12:59 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    The history of XCP has never included a dynamic pricing function for asset registration, so there wouldn't be any evidence to compare it to, but it's one of the worst market performers historically.

    The issuance fee was statically reduced to a more reasonable fixed 0.5 level when the XCP: BTC ratio was *significantly* higher than it is today to come to a more agreeable 'fair' issuance cost. Since then the price in BTC has fallen (considerably) whereas the BTC price in dollar has increased to somewhat level it out. the 'low' issuance fee remains.

    I don't know what a good number is nowadays, but does it not seem blindingly apparent that with asset fees dependent on the fixed cost of XCP. Realistically anyone registering assets wants the price low? or at least at a sustainable amount.

    Is that so crazy of a statement?
  • @heunland ↶ Reply to #29455 #29463 12:59 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    I was referring to Foldingcoin which I am the social media person of
  • @heunland #29465 01:01 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    Some of our devs are dedicating time to move forward with the CIPs that are of particular interest to our project. Maybe you did not read previous newsletters where that wad mentioned Mr Cornleone
  • @heunland #29467 01:02 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    Whateva close enough
  • @RonaldRubber ↶ Reply to #29465 #29469 01:04 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    i read it.
  • @RonaldRubber #29470 01:05 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    honestly was just trying to make conversation about the CIPs
  • @104473096 #29480 01:14 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    determining a good price point without an oracle is really difficult
  • @104473096 #29482 01:15 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    you would need to make it deterministically reproducible from chain parsing alone
  • @104473096 #29483 01:15 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    one way could be i.e. making it dependant on the amount of XCP remaining
  • @104473096 #29484 01:16 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    so we have a smooth curve moving forward
  • @104473096 #29486 01:16 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    yeah
  • @104473096 #29487 01:16 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    that's really a good thing
  • @104473096 #29488 01:16 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    or 40 subassets
  • @104473096 #29489 01:16 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    or pay a lot of dividends
  • @104473096 #29491 01:18 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    however, that curve should be modelled... prolly someone with mathlab skills could propose a proper model
  • @104473096 #29492 01:18 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    because we don't want asymptoticality on any "border"
  • @104473096 #29493 01:19 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    but the way to go is CIP proposals
  • @104473096 #29495 01:19 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    yeah....
  • @104473096 #29496 01:19 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    i'm also comfortable with 0.5
  • @104473096 #29497 01:19 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    but i'm open to being changed my mind regarding that
  • @104473096 #29501 01:21 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    regarding investors and speculation, i think of XCP as an utility token... one with a "reasonable" value between $5-$30
  • @104473096 #29502 01:21 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    even $50 is ok-ish price
  • @104473096 #29503 01:22 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    below $5 it's too cheap
  • @529335952 #29519 01:34 AM, 23 Aug 2018
    I don't think there's single actors holding the price down.. no not at all that would be a conspiracy theory

    I think the collective mentality is XCP works best at a 'reasonable' price range - mostly due to its function as an anti spam fee for asset creation. A perception issue.

    and simply put anybody wanting to register assets or build on XCP (which are the people who actually mostly matter) simply does not benefit from XCP price rising

    . The same is not true in most other coins (say ETH for example). If ETH fixed token creation fees at 0.5 ETH, sure there might be less shitcoins but a whole lot less activity People would want to keep ETH restrained at <$5 collectively to keep its utility
  • 24 August 2018 (1 messages)
  • @nathansonic #29530 03:50 PM, 24 Aug 2018
    Interesting discussion. Thanks for bringing it up MG.
  • 25 August 2018 (6 messages)
  • @Nickst2 ↶ Reply to #29534 #29536 11:42 AM, 25 Aug 2018
    Sounds like a scam
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29536 #29537 07:02 PM, 25 Aug 2018
    How so?
  • @IMPOSSIBLEARTIFACTS #29538 07:21 PM, 25 Aug 2018
    How can I set up a Counterparty node?
  • @Nickst2 ↶ Reply to #29537 #29539 07:39 PM, 25 Aug 2018
    I was replying to a scam message that has been deleted. Makes my message look odd
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29539 #29540 07:51 PM, 25 Aug 2018
    Ah no worries. Makes sense 😁
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29538 #29541 07:51 PM, 25 Aug 2018
    https://counterparty.io/docs/federated_node/
    Running a Node | Counterparty

    Installation/federated_node.md

  • 27 August 2018 (14 messages)
  • @ShaunApps #29555 01:02 PM, 27 Aug 2018
    lol https://twitter.com/ProfFaustus/status/1033995041696571393
  • @ShaunApps #29556 01:08 PM, 27 Aug 2018
    real information about the counterparty burn address can be found in last few paragraphs here: https://counterparty.io/news/why-proof-of-burn/
  • @447444055 #29558 02:11 PM, 27 Aug 2018
    Is this coin alive ?
  • @284937492 #29559 02:14 PM, 27 Aug 2018
    of fcng corse man, xcp is immortal
  • @284937492 #29560 02:14 PM, 27 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29556 #29561 02:21 PM, 27 Aug 2018
    What a bizarre perspective in the OP.
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29558 #29562 02:21 PM, 27 Aug 2018
    Yeah absolutely. Projects are active right now. (check pepevote and mafiawars -- two new counterparty based projects) the XCP DeX is working smoothly and consistently and Blockfolio just started pulling in data feeds for assets.
  • @447444055 #29563 02:22 PM, 27 Aug 2018
    👍
  • @clefence #29564 02:25 PM, 27 Aug 2018
    lol
  • @clefence #29565 02:25 PM, 27 Aug 2018
    I've been in crypto over 7 years please tell what is the dex addres?
  • @447444055 #29566 02:28 PM, 27 Aug 2018
    De centralised exchange ??
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29565 #29567 02:31 PM, 27 Aug 2018
    counterwallet.io
  • @104473096 ↶ Reply to #29555 #29568 02:31 PM, 27 Aug 2018
    this is embarrasing.... i just assumed he was a sociopath trying to do a landgrab, but now it seems clearly to me that he's just downright dumb
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29565 #29569 02:31 PM, 27 Aug 2018
    Or you can use Freewallet or Indiesquare wallet to see the Dex (decentralized exchange)
  • 28 August 2018 (6 messages)
  • @manksi #29573 04:50 PM, 28 Aug 2018
    We partnered up with Whopper.io to bring you limited quantities of unloaded physical Age of Chains cards for collecting.

    Woodcoin's Guardian is available now in limited quantity of 50 cards.

    Get yours now:
    https://whopper.io/artist-series-age-of-chains/
  • @jdogresorg #29574 04:58 PM, 28 Aug 2018
    Nice work 😀
  • @manksi #29575 04:58 PM, 28 Aug 2018
    Thanks! :)
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29573 #29576 05:02 PM, 28 Aug 2018
    Very cool indeed. I like this physical/digital confluence. It's great for the rare asset space.
  • @manksi #29577 05:33 PM, 28 Aug 2018
    Yes it is a good synergy
  • @664958147 #29579 09:00 PM, 28 Aug 2018
    Hello!
  • 29 August 2018 (5 messages)
  • @heunland #29582 12:16 AM, 29 Aug 2018
    Hi!
  • @ShawnLeary #29583 12:21 AM, 29 Aug 2018
    hallo!
  • @jdogresorg #29586 04:13 PM, 29 Aug 2018
    Hit me with a link and i'll fill the form out 🙂
  • @jdogresorg #29588 04:14 PM, 29 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @jdogresorg #29591 07:24 PM, 29 Aug 2018
    Don't think so.
  • 30 August 2018 (9 messages)
  • @PepeCashMillionaire ↶ Reply to #29591 #29602 06:57 PM, 30 Aug 2018
    a marketing guy from Huobi approached me a few months ago about listing pepes on there. seems now with blockfolio adding rares maybe we can make a second push to expand markets beyond xcpdex.com
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29602 #29603 07:31 PM, 30 Aug 2018
    Cool :) Absolutely the markets can be expanded, and from there comes new participants and new energy. There's some goodness on the horizon- all about getting our community together to work towards it.
  • @PepeCashMillionaire ↶ Reply to #29603 #29604 07:55 PM, 30 Aug 2018
    well the good and shitty part about decentralized projects is we are usually working perpendicularly and with little crossover. it would be interesting to form an XCP Token Consortium that basically is a Lobby on behalf of all asset holders but is independent of the XCP Core dev team itself ie a hoddlers association that approaches exchanges
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29604 #29605 08:18 PM, 30 Aug 2018
    Absolutely agreed. Decentralization is great but we it does make it hard to get collective unity. And the lack of any centralized entity sitting on premine fortunes makes it harder. do wish 1-5% of the supply were allocated towards development or that a small amount of inflation occured with those funds being diverted towards advancement of the project. In the asbence of that, ir a foundation of sorts some kind of union or consortium as you suggest seems a great approach.
  • @ShawnLeary #29608 08:35 PM, 30 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @529335952 ↶ Reply to #29483 #29609 09:12 PM, 30 Aug 2018
    Just looking back at the archives -- why not go with the 0.6 * (2,316,056/2.6*10**7) approach instead?
  • @529335952 #29610 09:15 PM, 30 Aug 2018
    I mean what prevented that from occuring in the end, if anyone knows?
  • @raretruck #29611 09:48 PM, 30 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-30_21-48-22.jpg
  • @RonaldRubber #29612 11:09 PM, 30 Aug 2018

    its-for-a-truck.gif.mp4

  • 31 August 2018 (4 messages)
  • @raretruck #29622 02:23 PM, 31 Aug 2018

    photo_2018-08-31_14-23-08.jpg
  • @ShawnLeary #29623 02:50 PM, 31 Aug 2018
    sticker (6).webp
  • @RonaldRubber ↶ Reply to #29625 #29626 04:33 PM, 31 Aug 2018
    It’s not real to get ETH
  • @raretruck #29627 04:46 PM, 31 Aug 2018
    Use the real to get ETH, don't use the fake and get BURN
  • 01 Aug 2018 (3)
  • 02 Aug 2018 (5)
  • 03 Aug 2018 (5)
  • 04 Aug 2018 (4)
  • 05 Aug 2018 (8)
  • 06 Aug 2018 (1)
  • 07 Aug 2018 (6)
  • 08 Aug 2018 (10)
  • 09 Aug 2018 (70)
  • 10 Aug 2018 (7)
  • 12 Aug 2018 (3)
  • 13 Aug 2018 (6)
  • 14 Aug 2018 (5)
  • 15 Aug 2018 (116)
  • 16 Aug 2018 (4)
  • 18 Aug 2018 (30)
  • 19 Aug 2018 (15)
  • 20 Aug 2018 (35)
  • 21 Aug 2018 (50)
  • 22 Aug 2018 (13)
  • 23 Aug 2018 (39)
  • 24 Aug 2018 (1)
  • 25 Aug 2018 (6)
  • 27 Aug 2018 (14)
  • 28 Aug 2018 (6)
  • 29 Aug 2018 (5)
  • 30 Aug 2018 (9)
  • 31 Aug 2018 (4)