- 01 October 2024 (59 messages)
-
-
proof of stake for xcp? :D -
can anyone explain this better?
-
If he's a nobody, just ban -
Proof of burn means nothing
-
Explain that to me like I'm 5.
Then do the same for proof of stake shitcoins 🙏 -
Please
-
Proof of burn was the initial burning of btc to prove that the initial adopters were willing to put their money where their mouths were. It doesn't show that goodwill today, since it happened at one time historically. It neither puts any kind of pressure on the price of xcp. That btc is just gone.
PoS, don't they give you a theoretical chance of a payout? -
Po's = unlimited manipulation of circulation number.
POB= never able to create more and can only destroy/ make rest worth more -
I'm retarded and prolly wrong....
-
-
Without proof of burn, XCP would be a shitcoin -
Proof of burn means everything
-
What does it actually do after it was closed?
-
The entire ethos of which XCP was created
-
If the money went to the founders, XCP would be totally different
-
XCP was created for people, not for the founders to enrich themselves
Proof of burn is the greatest thing about CP -
🤷♂
-
few
-
sits there forever. "the law of conservation of energy, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but can only be transformed from one form to another."
-
hard for fiat mindset people to understand this concept
-
"the law of conservation of energy, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but can only be transformed from one form to another."
Counterparty follows the law of conservation of energy. The burned #Bitcoins sent to an unspendable address are not gone, they are merely transformed into another energy force.
Verify yourself anon - https://tokenscan.io/address/1CounterpartyXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXUWLpVr -
What is this some kind of numerology
-
The value of those btc is now 0
-
The value of the resulting xcp is now unrelated to bt those btc.
-
like I said - hard for fiat mindset people to understand this concept. you dont understand physics my fren
-
Lmao
-
-
You don't show that there is any connection. You're just mapping your occult concepts on to crypto.
-
-
Memetics are important in crypto. Narratives are important. I’d argue they’re likely more important than technicals. I think with the upcoming launch of Fair Minting, there will be a renewed interest in the OG Fair Mint -
Of course narratives are important, but you also have to be able to suspend disbelief.
-
its true knowledge of physics is def an occult practice in todays clown world
-
I’m with Gmoney, the energy is locked in, same with the value
-
XCP at least should be the same mcap of the burned bitcoins
-
So xcp is pinned to btc, like tether is pinned to usd?
-
Sounds like an alpha opportunity
-
"Should", but it doesn't cause any pressure on the price in that direction
-
So the knock against most shitcoins is that they attempt to breach the digital scarcity of Bitcoin. This is why they are hated. But XCP, by contrast, took a bunch of Bitcoin out of commission forever. So it did the opposite: made Bitcoin more scarce. So it’s a shitcoin that can be embraced. 😁
-
Name any other alt existing on a blockchain where the issuance to create it was by destroying 100% of the value
-
It's a good origin story
-
Knew youd have a hard time with this 🤣
-
I’m defending it, bud.
-
The knock is that shitcoins breach the laws of nature
-
But are you defending it *physically*?
-
You are missing the point
-
You just live inside your own mind. It doesn't make any sense to outsiders.
-
I promise, I would not be here if BTC wasn’t 100% burned for XCP
-
Let me guess u are a stamps guy 🤣
-
I hated the banks when I started with Bitcoin
Bitcoin was for the people.
When I saw XCP, I said this is for the people
This entire crypto thing lost its way a long time ago -
But apparently most people do not give a fuck
-
No.. I don't mind it, except the hostilities, but I never got into it.
-
The path is narrow
-
Transmuted 🤔⚡
-
-
IMO, Proof of burn is critical to the founding and ongoing success of XCP. It's proof of principals via proof of work.
The founding devs needed a native coin to properly incentivize the network, and proof of burn was the most fair way they came up with to distribute. Its genius really. If they would have just given the coins away for free, then they were created out of thin air, there is no proof of work and its a shitcoin. If they had an ICO, it would have gone against the principals of the project and poisoned the community with greed and jealousy. Verifiably burning something that takes work to acquire was the solution.
In the end, there will only be room for one tokenization protocol to prevail, just like there is only one internet, one email, and one cryptocurrency (there is no second best). Of course the technology matters (built on btc, decentralized exchange, convenient wallet integration, etc) but the verifiable principals and origin story are going to be what makes Counterparty the ultimate winner. -
You can be 10 years late to the party and still get a better price than the people who have been here since inception
-
Everyone has had their fair chance
- 02 October 2024 (44 messages)
-
Hearing things -
-
i dont want to name names.
-
-
No other disps on that address?
-
What are these? Are these valuable? -
TRUMPAGENT
Issuance 217
https://tokenscan.io/asset/TRUMPAGENT
https://tokenscan.io/tx/feaaa0a627cc6eb17ac4ec2f835d855bbbfbbba69ab3618f51621e68415881f8 -
more and more people buying XCP, this mean something is coookingggg
-
i want more xcp.
-
I’d say the ol wash trading -
do you think xcp can reach 2bn marketcap? i think so
-
This guy claims he will sell a big bag at a fabulous price:
https://t.me/xcpdesk/2865
If it's for real, it's probably worth grabbing it.
BUT it smells a bit funky..............Zzzzzz zzzzzzz in XCP OTC DESKoffer available at $10 for now
-
New here? -
Technicals are most important, someone should tell the marketing team.
-
Really depends on goals. If a great tech stack languishes in obscurity with little use, is it really that “great”?
There’s a saying: the best camera is the one you have with you. Doesn’t matter if you’ve got a fancy pro DSLR camera at home, when the phone in your pocket is the one you’re going to take the photo with.
I’d argue that network effect is critical to any protocol particularly in crypto. The best protocol is the one that reaches mass adoption. The “technicals” are implementation details. -
FORCE trumps ALL. The network effect of shitcoin L2's backed by nothing (eth, pos) = ZERO warfighting abilities in cyber space. gl
-
They say that email is outdated technically, but good luck replacing it.
-
-
Am I the only one who enjoys seeing Bitcoin go down more than up lol
-
Nope.
All I see is corn -
-
Sigh... Apeing in here with money I'd set aside for tax season. As long as Bitcoin is higher in April 2025, then I'm good lol
-
Most people say they want to "buy the dip," but when the dip comes they have endless rationalizations for not buying it.
Instead they buy shipcoins..........
A buddy was recently buying some token based on Taylor Swift's cat (Benji?).
Just buy BTC and let it do its magic............ -
I buy the dip 👍
-
3 trumprare cards bought today , big volume on rarepepes
-
YUGE Volume
-
-
yes
-
I'm not against this interpretation, but it gets a little too meta for me. I'd have to think about it a bit.
-
The rarest TRUMPRARE. Gift from Mr. Looney himself.
-
wow man thats so fucking great!!
-
Yes 100%. It’s make believe ownership
-
Who’s to say all the other sats in the wallet doesn’t own the inscription
-
No, same here.
-
That sounds rather reasonable 👍
- 03 October 2024 (110 messages)
-
SATOSHISWORD
https://tokenscan.io/tx/c2900092d69db65e9cd69012bc94f9f9ba0b346ac3de30f9e16edec19e0290f2
GOLDENLOTUS
https://tokenscan.io/tx/3c960a47da83bea4193ca573e7595bbd838faa240ff86e5b0ebf6cea8e11e59d
WOJAKBLAINE
https://tokenscan.io/tx/ef4e182db1f00c55a5857fca68d4902d2843ec6b14edbd1a40a3a1728ee3629c
PEPEFISHBAND
https://tokenscan.io/tx/87ac1868435030c3e89a0274d8a0849d222d7aceebd3aa5a1365e32cb017df58 -
No sir -
Not sir 😄 -
Which factors drive XCP price appreciation?
I can think of:
Bitcoin price appreciation.
Buying and holding XCP.
Volume of counterparty transactions?
Am i right? Anything else? -
Demand for Rare Pepes and the like drives the price of XCP up, especially if there are a lot listed for XCP -
The minting features being added, you have the option of making XCP what you need to pay or burn to mint. You'll also lock your XCP in escrow for the duration of the mint.
And the utxo attach feature being added this month also requires XCP as a gas fee, if there is enough transactional demand to apply it. -
also xcp is very scarce, it is burned to make named assets (and sweeps) and there is still a significant amount locked in quite the red tape legal battle for exchanges like Bittrex and Poloniex -
bittrex and polo still have ownership of these xcp? or lost forever?
-
imho there are a bit of chances for trex
-
but for polo , zero
-
They can most likely access it if they want to
-
maybe after so long time and property passages they lost th keys
-
i talk for polo
-
tristan d'agosta—>circle——>justin sun
-
so after the v2 upgrade we can trade XCP like runes and ordinals?
-
I think this would be a bad thing
-
why? yeah there will be lack of liquidity, that's sure
-
Yeah
-
anyone that can confirm this?
-
yeah thats why many months ago i proposed to add 1 decimal or 2
-
Yeah, I think most people were on board with increasing the supply by 10, 100 or even 1000x
-
-
Whats the latest on all that
-
👀
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/issues/2297Move Decimal Point on XCP (?) · Issue #2297 · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-coreXCP is divisible to eight decimal places, but there are only ~2.6m in the primary unit—far less than any other coin than I know of. Most coins have total supplies on the order of 100x or 1000x grea...
-
best solution ever imho
-
even polkadot did this
-
even to destroy psicological barriers , polkadot with old tokenomics at ath would have been : 5000$ each
-
huge psicological barrier and it cause illiquid books
-
people are weak with their minds , they would be more happy to buy 100 xcp for 9$ instead of 1 for 9$
-
illiquid trading books *
-
yes i will ! thanks adam
-
The opposite is true also, I don’t want to sell when I only have X XCP but if I had 1,000,000, I don’t mind giving up a few
-
yes but "you" think only for yourself if you think like this because there are many new people that wants to buy a big chunk of XCP and with the current supply is not possible .. even because i would say 30%? of supply is lost forever .. we need a "split" on supply from my point of view otherwise we would have not so many new people jumping in
-
you are ok with the current supply cause you have already a bag probably
-
I don’t mind a split
-
I like it
-
ah so you like the idea to add 2 0 to supply?
-
Yes, not really adding, just splitting
-
yeah ofc not adding
-
for example you have 100 xcp now , after split it becomes 10k
-
i mean like this is ok
-
Yes I’m in favor, doesn’t harm anyone
-
ok yeah we agree on this , it doesnt harm anyone :D
-
its just to give better liquidity and distribution
-
0.00689 XCP per American citizen is a little light
-
everyone gets XCP at the price they deserve
-
XCP is divisible
-
like every other coin ..
-
Gulp 👀
-
-
out of curiosity, if 2 0 would be added, do you guys think named asset creation fee would be raised as well from 0.5 XCP or would a few cents be enough as spam protection? -
So if price of xcp moons will the fee to mint assets go down?
-
Counterparty (@CounterpartyXCP) on X📢 New Release! #Counterparty Core v10.4.2: https://t.co/0QqWAHvRJD. This is a hotfix release that addresses a few important bugs, such as regressions in the v1 API and disabling P2SH transaction encoding, which was causing issues with MPMA transactions. If you're running a
-
So P2SH encoding is now disabled? This is the solution to me pointing out that people were having issues doing MPMA sends on the new 10.4 version of counterparty?
-
So.... no more MPMA sends? Back to just having to do single sends of every asset now?
-
@teysol ^^
-
Eh?
-
MPMA sends use P2SH encoding... in the latest version 10.4, users of freewallet were having issues, I pointed these issues out, and the solution is to disable P2SH encoding apparently. So, just asking for clarification, do MPMA Sends still work in this new 10.4.2 release? @teysol
-
Would be great if we could have discussions about these types of changes rather than just doing immediate "hotfix" releases which break current functionality which many users use!
-
MPMA Issues: First TX Succeeds Second TX Fails · Issue #2270 · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core
Getting reports that there is a regression in Core > v9.61.3:
-
Cuz from my perspective... it sure looks like you just forced a change into 10.4.2, which breaks MPMA sends, and requires wallets to update.... interesting how FreeWallet is the only wallet that supports MPMA, lots of users use it, and now all of a sudden a change is put out which requires a wallet update and breaks MPMA for users..... if that is not the case, then please speak up. @teysol
-
-
disabling p2sh encoding immediately without any activation date or warning is bullshit... I am fine with migrating to a new data encoding method, like multisig, but this should be planned and discussed and an activation block set so developers have time to make necessary updates.... and yes, still waiting on clarification from Adam...
-
No, it should become variable in the future. Like gas on EVM -
Is this multi-send? -
yes. MPMA = Multi Peer Mult Asset sends, which have always used P2SH to encode data. This latest release immediately removes P2SH encoding. Best case scenario, multisig encoding will work and Freewallet will need to make immediate changes.... Worst case scenario, MPMAs are broken until multisig encoding works... immediately depreciating an encoding method without any plan or activation block seems very sus.
-
Simple question Adam. Does multisig encoding work for MPMA sends in 10.4.2? Yes or No?
-
Thank you for the clarification. I will make the necessary updates to FreeWallet in the next few days. In the future it would be great if you would set activation blocks before depreciating an encoding method. Makes it tough for devs to want to build on the platform when the ground shifts under their feet without any notice.
-
Also, fyi, release notes dont say anything about mpma encoding switching from p2sh to multisig, might want to add that.
-
Cool, so it doesn't immediately depreciate an encoding method that has been used for years, and require immediate updates to wallets that rely on the p2sh encoding method?!? lol.... stop trying to spin it. I am fine with updating to multisig encoding, but again, changes like this should be PLANNED, not immediate.
-
cool, so freewallet doesn't need to be updated then huh? it can keep using P2SH encoding on 10.4.2?
-
cmon bro... i'm playing nice, i'll go along with your "just use multisig" solution, but lets not pretend this wasn't an immediate change to depreciate an encoding method, and that if freewallet was pointing to a 10.4.2 node now, it wouldn't require an immediate update to freewallet (no P2SH encoding in 10.4.2) to switch to multisig.
-
Doing my best to play nice and be respectful here... but, you made a change, MPMA wont work in my wallet with 10.4.2 without changes, As a dev, it would be nice to be able to PLAN this stuff and not have an encoding method immediately rug-pulled
-
freewallet does mpmas... mpmas are always p2sh... which require 2 transactions, so not the fire n forget (api call / sign / broadcast) that multisig is
-
as I said, fine with switching to multisig, but more notice on deprecating an encoding method than immediate would be apprecaited in the future
-
as I said, mpma sends are having issues on 10.4... which is why I created the issue... currently MPMA p2sh sends are only working on 9.61.3... was planning to update to 10.4
-
but before I updated to 10.4, I wanted to make sure MPMA sends were working, hence why I created the issue saying users were having issues, the solution was not to fix P2SH encoding in 10.4.xx... but instead to depreciate it
-
dotn want to bicker anymore, or play semantics games... i'll switch to multisig, but IMO this was bad form on your part to take an issue with 10.4 p2sh encoding and have the solution be to just immediately depreciate the encoding.... we can agree to disagree... back to lurking.
-
Hey, what’s the limit on a multisend? It’s probably a little different if you’re sending a single asset vs different assets, but where does it start to max out.
-
I've done up to like 130 before
-
With P2SH encoding Javier and I tested up to 1000 sends successfully… and I believe in the repo there is a harcoded thousand send limit.
However, now that users have to use multisig encoding, probably much less than that, as you can’t fit as much data into multisig outputs as you can in P2SH….. so the end result is multisig mpma sends will be much larger txs, and require more Bitcoin to be put in each of those outputs…
And gathering the BTC from those multisig transaction outputs also will be more expensive since there are many more outputs required to encode the data.
Hopefully support for storing data in the witness area (taproot) is added to counterparty soon…. Until then, MPMA sends just got a lot more expensive🤷🏻♂️ -
I did more 160+)
-
can you point me to the announcement or release notes on bitcoin core where they say that p2sh encoding / decoding is being depreciated? I am not finding anything.
-
This is for bitcoin sv 😂 -
No need
-
P2SH is the one that depends on an cached environment variable if I remember correctly? Like if the server restarts for any reason the 2nd transaction will fail?
I agree with killing it if this is the one… but I also agree with @BrrrGuy points -
New Series X Card from @pepeproject by Kenny
Do you know the POWER of 3 6 9?
Math is Magical 🪄 - 04 October 2024 (32 messages)
-
I now have new respect for 3,6,9 after a little research
I’ve been trying to avoid odd numbers in my UI pixels, especially 3, 6 and 9 unless 69 together lol
My daughters favorite number was 1 but changed it to 3 yesterday and I told her that’s a bad number, go back to 1 -
Number 3: Often considered a powerful number in many cultures, representing balance and harmony. In geometry, a triangle, with its three sides, is the simplest stable structure.
-
3 is considered balance and harmony. I’d think it would be opposite. Seems like nothing balances with 3 lol
-
and 3 (6+9) = 3 1 5 kek
-
-
PEPERRR
https://tokenscan.io/tx/e5e32e2e72685ed46fc2946dbacac7aac4c27e2a1c3834ac46bc324701480db7 -
Counterparty is more powerful. The protocol can escrow, allowing much more functionality
-
For example, and someone correct me if I’m wrong…
If you want to buy 100 XCP and 5 people are selling it, you can buy all 100 from 5 people in a single transaction
While with runes, no order book exists making you purchase the 100 Runes from 5 different people in 5 different transactions -
Since sats (Bitcoin) can’t be escrowed, there are many things Runes will never be able to do that Counterparty assets (escrowable) could do.
-
News to me. Big, if true.
-
The fair mint function coming is another example.
Since the protocol can escrow XCP and if a certain threshold is not met, the protocol can return your XCP since it’s escrowable with no charge or tx while that’s not possible with Runes -
Using the Dex, CP really needs a synthetic Bitcoin to make it escrowable
-
If someone created a synthetic Bitcoin and a USD stable coin on CP, they would make a fortune IMO
-
That would enable the trading of Bitcoin using just CP, in and out, BTC to USD, back to BTC, with no need for a centralized exchange
-
Still have to trust the issuer, but you wouldn’t be dependent on the exchanges security
-
I have LITEXCP
-
Been done…. They shut down after they learned they were considered an unlicensed money exchanger. A bit more complex than the technicals (easy)…. Gotta work within the legal framework n get licensed as a money exchanger in all 50 states, plus yearly fees n oversight, etc. there is a reason no one has stepped into this void.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140613030406/http://www.vennd.io/ -
It’s all on Tron these days. Not sure it’s even economical to do it on Bitcoin L1 given block times and fees. And since you’re implicitly trusting a 3rd party, you don’t really even need the security assurances of Bitcoin.
-
Not day trade, but a trade here and there at tops and bottoms without leaving the BTC network.
Trusting a 3rd party sure, but using an exchange, your trusting the exchange and the 3rd party -
If Tether issued on BTC CP, you would only rely on Tether and not exchanges
-
Yup, need to flee the US to do it
-
Even with the licenses, you still need white lists for KYC to comply which CP doesn’t have
-
So it would not be possible to do this and follow the law
-
Maybe I’m wrong about needing KYC? Does anyone know?
-
It be awesome to have white lists on CP. Could create funds, etc…
-
An AngelList on Bitcoin
-
I could issue shares for a company on CP, but I couldn’t ever do it legally without a whitelist.
The people on the whitelist could trade with each other, I think that would be fine, but once the token leaves the group that was KYC’ed, I think that’s when the problems start.
Right now, there is no way to prevent that from happening if you did issue shares on CP. -
If only those on the whitelist can trade with one another and their addresses are all known, effectively you have an accounting record of all balances at all times. The rationale for doing any of this on a blockchain with tokens doesn’t seem to make sense as any sort of “efficiency” over just keeping it all in a permissioned database.
-
Records are transparent and secure, tamper proof
- 05 October 2024 (5 messages)
-
There is a LOT of crypto stuff going on overseas. Seem like it would not be a legal issue for someone in Dubai, El Salvador, or any of the other crypto friendly countries.
-
Hey guys, is it working the testnet token creation? -
This is a good idea. We have talked about a lock function where users couldn’t even sell tokens until x block height on src-20. Perhaps if/when cp goes to design smart contracts it would be possible to limit sales within the WL. I know of a crypto mining operation that is doing it out of their Swiss corp but on polygon I think -
PEPEGIGACHAD
Sir. Michael Saylor referencing the classic cover of the BATMAN, YEAR TWO (1987) detective comic. with some changes to his bat signal in this case it is the bitcoin symbol and how Michael with his company Microstrategy became the guru of Cryptos.
Sir. Michael Saylor
KEK
https://tokenscan.io/asset/PEPEGIGACHAD
https://tokenscan.io/tx/c8aa05eb78c0bb947bea8b10f4f364872471d987fa20521db62626c3a9a09a6d - 06 October 2024 (30 messages)
-
jake.sats (@jakegallen_) on X
TEST was selling for 5 ETH in 2021 💀
-
Shaban Shaame (@shaban_shaame) on X
I can't wait for this event in #Miami @CounterpartyXCP is experiencing a significant boost in recent times. Counterparty2.0 is the new player in town that will revive tokenization on #bitcoin blockchain. Many developments we can feel the vibe. @queentatiana @CounterpartyMkt
-
-
Hey frogs, what other art directories are there on CPXCP other than 17art, Danks, n Pepe project ??
-
Fake Rare
-
Fake commons
-
Faux Sog
-
Wojak Way
-
Stamps
-
GOGO
-
Hodlpet
-
Rare Coco -
Common Coco
-
Kaleidoscope
-
Thanks guy's👊
-
WTB TEST for $90 hmu ;)
-
Phockheads
Rare Shadilay
Flooneys
Drooling Ape Bus Club -
alot
https://time.graphics/line/858561Counterparty Historic NFT Timeline - TimelineA visual representation of Counterparty (XCP) history, tokens, projects, developments, drafted developments and forks. This platform is one of the e...
-
havent added Flooneys yet tho, need to get on that
-
Assetname:WALLETPROFIT
Tokenscan link: https://17art.io/trump/WALLETPROFIT
17ART Link: https://tokenscan.io/asset/WALLETPROFIT
17ART Collection
https://tokenscan.io/tx/05876332e051604dca1c11565ff5bd80dbd4c74736bc4b144a8ed50e5a919bd8 -
gm ☕️ could someone plz explain why it says "DO NOT send funds to a dispenser from a taproot address (start with bc1p)!" is there a link where i can learn the rules about this? thanks! -
Not compatible currently. Use another address type or lose your funds. -
so for example i got a copy of mingie's card BLOCPEPE from an addy that is a taproot address. i intend on keeping the card, i love mingie's cards. but what would happen if i put it in a dispenser? if someone dispensed it would it strip other things out of my wallet as well?
-
-
this is a Segwit address (starts with bc1q) .... taproot addresses start with bc1p - which can be confusing because of the "p" and "q"
right now it is not supported by any wallet to create a dispenser on a taproot address.... to follow taproot upgrades keep an eye on the Milestones tab in the Counterparty Github - as Taproot address support is under the "v11.1.0 (Protocol Change — Address Support and TX Format)" future update
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/milestonesMilestones - CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-coreCounterparty Protocol Reference Implementation. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
and no, setting up a dispenser will not "strip other things out of your wallet" - a dispenser only functions when set up by the user for that specific asset.... meaning only that specific asset can be 'dispensed' because you set it up that way
this User Manual entry for Freewallet (freewallet.io) should give you a good understanding of how they work:
https://davestaxcp.gitbook.io/freewallet.io-user-manual/freewallet-functions/setting-up-a-dispenser -
-
-
imma auction a whole set of muh cards, dank auction house
- 07 October 2024 (6 messages)
-
GM WOJHODLers!
https://xchain.io/tx/cdeb5ef2639176ef658afbeea1b7ddd9dca25282492e14da8690402f057188ec -
Community sentiment on coinmarketcap 🔥
-
If you have spares Rare Pepe cards and want to swap for cards you don't have send me a DM. I might be able to help 🐸🔥👊🏼
-
Gm gm! If anyone is interested in stamps pepes I have a new pair of stamps! -
-
- 08 October 2024 (22 messages)
-
is there a tool to check for stamps? sorting by volume and so on
-
stamped.ninja -
thanks really much!
-
No. Not sure what you mean new platform?
-
SATOSRC20 (@satosrc20) on X🎮🔥 We’ve got players hitting amazing records! 🔝💯 Remember, the top 3 on the leaderboard 🏆 will win a fantastic SATO prize 🎁✨ Give it your all! ⏳ The game ends on January 1, 2025 📅🚀 👉 Play here: https://t.co/tbmWG9mZb6 🎮 #GameOn #HighScores #SATO #satoshi #src20
-
Hey yall 👋
Noob here using XCP dispensers for the first time.
If I want to buy multple XCP but the give quanitiy says 1.
How do I get multiple?
Do I just times the amount by how many XCP I want and the system does the math on the other side? -
Yes
-
Ty. And give remaining is straight forward.
Is there any potential issue of a limited amount remaining and multiple people sending in the same block? -
Yes. The first tx to be included will get it
-
Always use high fee
-
Excellent. And how are you guys calculating sats/vbyte in Freewallet?
-
Or does setting to High do it automatically.
-
I look at mempool.space for the current high fee personally
-
How do you get your TX size tho
-
Freewallet calculate it automatically
-
newest version calculates the sats/vb in the wallet - but it is best to use a higher fee than the "high" fee setting to be safe
check the user manual at freewallet.io for an in depth explanation of all FW features ❤️ -
Also check the fee graphs if the mempool, you can't be sure otherwise
- 09 October 2024 (11 messages)
-
Apparently Satoshi did the initial security audit for Counterparty 😝
-
Bloody is one word that was on my radar for Satoshi. Elon’s used it a couple times and so has Todd.
-
-
Good floor back to $146k
-
If somebody wants to sell around this price (or all the way down to $20) LMK
-
Same. I'll def drop $20 on a Nakamoto
-
If anyone wants to trade 50% of the supply of my card CHAMPAGNETNT (50,000 of 100,000 supply) for 1 NAKAMOTO, I'm also up for that trade.
-
This may give you an answer fren
https://xcp.ninja/collectionsXCP Ninja, the counterparty reference.Explore a wide range of Counterparty assets through a powerful search engine. Tools such as minting, directories and more.
-
The Return of Counterparty with Adam Krellenstein - Co-Creator of the OG Meta-Protocol
Counterparty is back in active development after taking a long hiatus. For the newer Bitcoiners that typically listen to this podcast, you may not know what Counterparty is. In this conversation with Adam, we discuss: [0:00] Shitcoins on Bitcoin. 2014 vs Now. [4:40] Meta-Protocols vs Forking Bitcoin [6:52] Centralization Fears: Core Devs vs Mining [9:20] OP_Return Debate [11:00] Alternative tokens on Bitcoin [16:00] What is Counterparty [22:04] Counterparty 2.0: Big upgrades [28:25] What does XCP token do [31:10] Where do Counterparty'ers hang out [33:40] Future Roadmap [37:00] What Adam's most excited about Follow Adam on Twitter: @agkrellenstein Learn more about Counterparty: https://counterparty.io/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Follow me on Twitter: @JakeBlockchain Stay updated on everything Built on Bitcoin podcast: https://www.builtonbitcoin.xyz/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Building something amazing on Bitcoin? Connect with us at the Bitcoin Frontier Fund. We invest and assist the best early-stage founders building new user-cases for Bitcoin. Website: https://www.btcfrontier.fund/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/BTCFrontierFund Love yall! See you in the next episode. Peace!
- 10 October 2024 (40 messages)
-
The matrix is still alive... and many are still sleeping.
https://tokenscan.io/asset/ORQANON
https://tokenscan.io/tx/39101cb0668dbdb2747ea161d96a38605a594ad1e8d9771a73575010d1b8a469 -
go to 11:30 and tell me if Adam said “Bitcorn” -
he did -
my wife and I laughed at it
-
Glad to be part of this great comunity. -
Adam also said that creating a named asset was 2 xcp but that’s not correct.
it’s .5 xcp -
Do you think that matters in 2024?
-
Im not sure people value that narrative
-
xcp bot is down since 2 days :/
-
Yes, it’s the most important part.
-
-
They knew that the work says it all.
Won't need sales.
Everyone gets XCP at the price they deserve.
Reconcile.. -
That's the point of POW/POB.
Actions speak louder than stakes.... -
You certainly know way more than me. 🙏
Wasn't trying to tell you anything.
Was speaking to the point that CP doesn't need salesman.
Wasn't meant as a dick measuring contest sort of a comment, it was meant as a high five sort of comment.....
The "reconcile" wasn't for those that know about CP. It was for those that don't.
Ftw....
Have killer day frogs.. 🐸🪖👊 -
Yes -
gm gm -
Also 1 C XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (15 X's) = 1315 😄
-
-
- 11 October 2024 (24 messages)
-
Why would people who don't know about counterparty, be reading the counterparty telegram chat?
-
🙄
-
That's how I learned about counterparty was reading the chat...
And listening to dank frogs like you 🐸🪖🙏 -
I see some buying on zaif.
People starting to notice things? -
Did the XCP OTC chat get nuked?
Don’t c it anymore -
-
XCP 2.0 soon , right? :D
-
It feels like a "cleaning" by Telegram
-
Since he has been apprehended by French authorities
-
❤️
-
wtf is that?
-
Yeah, feeling the same thing
-
Native dispensers (see above)
Tiny CEX "dex-trade com"
Or zaif, if you're in Japan -
ehehehe big upgrade incoming
-
xcp will moon hard
-
Many experiments pre-stamps though the only thing I can think of as a “full collection” using onchain art is PUNYCODES which I ran. It’s all emojis essentially so it’s sort of debatable whether they are philosophically onchain or not
-
- 12 October 2024 (28 messages)
-
Folks
I can't see or find the XCP OTC telegram group.
Was it somehow deleted? -
Weird —- hard to imagine they broke any censorship rules.
Was it accidentally nuked? -
#softwar
-
Directories no, tokens yes
-
-
If we use 20% of the supply over two years, we’re trading at a $3mm market cap
-
No
-
I think he got nuked too -
Fake Rare room get nuked?
-
It’s still accessible
-
Link?
-
-
-
Maybe it went private?
-
i must have kicked you for posting rares
-
I think it more about that group losing its only admin
-
He's contactable on twitter
-
OLGA and CCSATOSHI ... couple in Fake Rares
-
Prob a few more but I haven't had my coffee yet
-
technically Rare Ordinal Directory links to onchain art too i guess you might be able to count that
-
you could probably count all of Stamps as well as OLGA Stamps too
- 13 October 2024 (24 messages)
-
Dispensers
-
Whoa, something is up......
Is someone emptying out all of the XCP dispensers while the OTC group is down?
Zaif moving up to........
Somebody making a grab for the remaining XCP??? -
FWIW my previous dispensers were cleaned out (as were most of the others I gather), so I set up a new one:
https://tokenscan.io/tx/d1b4fea6ceeefbb649aa908aa08d1b0caba0ee9d631c0078ce58dddd8a0ecffe -
-
I smell a bull market
-
-
Is there actual volume on zaif now?
-
Dispensers, or tiny CEX "dex-trade com"
-
Not really. Check out the order book. Super thin. But unlike DeX Trade, no fake bots, so mostly real orders.
-
when pump
-
-
the volumje on zaif is 1.2k
-
-
Yeah, honestly I'm surprised the volume is in the 4 digits.
The order book is INSANELY thin. -
-
Is safe DEX-TRADE for buy XCP? they have the withdraw of xcp disabled -
It's a bad exchange. They do this sometimes for some reason.
-
This far they turn it back on.
-
its disabled since a lot of time
-
no sense to buy there imho
- 14 October 2024 (58 messages)
-
imagine XCP listing on binance following the big update incoming :D
-
-
-
😐
-
new website ?
-
yup
-
link? its not counterparty.io, right?
-
not yet
-
but soon
-
ok thanks ! :D
-
Still not fully cooked yet
-
Love it, very clean
-
Thanks!
-
If you have suggestions for the main catchphrase, don't hesitate to propose ^^
-
where to buy pepecash -
❤️❤️❤️
-
I like it, here’s some suggestions by ChatGPT
-
-
anybody can tell me👀
-
Original suggestion “Counterparty: The Original Token Protocol on Bitcoin, Fairly Launched by Burning 2,000+ BTC—A Decade of Innovation and Integrity.”
-
what marketplace now
-
Thermodynamically sound tokenization on #Bitcoin
-
shorter is better ^^
-
I don’t know what this means, but I like the sounds of it
-
Bitcoin secured tokenization
-
Bitcoin secured tokenization since 2014
-
Xcpisdibesss haha
2140 btc I think 🤔 was burned -
Who cares about secured, people use ordinals 😅
-
Send BTC with the wrong wallet, burn all your ordinals
-
Bitcoin security is the most important part of XCP
-
looks good
-
-
I think we need to move away from calling them "burned" they technically weren't destroyed they were transformed
-
Hello any admin here ? -
👍🔥
Transmuted even.. -
if we hit on this wording the Michael Saylor maxi's wont be able to say jack shit! haha
-
Force Multiplied
-
-
-
What happens when the XCP is destroyed during issuance of an asset or used for gas?
-
Good thing it's divisible 🤔?
Gone=rest more scarce? -
Or is there evil affoot?🤔🤣
-
Counterparty
Burning since Block 278,319 -
"chain reaction" to ignite a fire (idea) then the other elements depends on the mix of ingredients for the fire to stay lit
-
Counterparty: Where to Buy Pepecash
-
I asked Jdog once
-
-
This was his answer
-
anyone know what up with this dispenser of XCP? a couple ppl sent BtC and nothing was dispensed
https://tokenscan.io/address/18gqVc73gEjcwkzJiAc3uD1eKHzasdLmzv - 15 October 2024 (23 messages)
-
I think that dispenser was closed with this tx
-
PEPERRR
https://tokenscan.io/tx/e5e32e2e72685ed46fc2946dbacac7aac4c27e2a1c3834ac46bc324701480db7
Official Counterparty Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 Oct 2024 (59)
- 02 Oct 2024 (44)
- 03 Oct 2024 (110)
- 04 Oct 2024 (32)
- 05 Oct 2024 (5)
- 06 Oct 2024 (30)
- 07 Oct 2024 (6)
- 08 Oct 2024 (22)
- 09 Oct 2024 (11)
- 10 Oct 2024 (40)
- 11 Oct 2024 (24)
- 12 Oct 2024 (28)
- 13 Oct 2024 (24)
- 14 Oct 2024 (58)
- 15 Oct 2024 (23)
- 16 Oct 2024 (28)
- 17 Oct 2024 (174)
- 18 Oct 2024 (450)
- 19 Oct 2024 (451)
- 20 Oct 2024 (129)
- 21 Oct 2024 (203)
- 22 Oct 2024 (626)
- 23 Oct 2024 (68)
- 24 Oct 2024 (54)
- 25 Oct 2024 (18)
- 26 Oct 2024 (44)
- 27 Oct 2024 (564)
- 28 Oct 2024 (556)
- 29 Oct 2024 (950)
- 30 Oct 2024 (793)
- 31 Oct 2024 (518)