- 30 October 2024 (793 messages)
-
It could be that he opened up that dispenser before the update last year, which required that dispensers not have any XCP or BTC history… the functionality that was recently disabled by counterparty, is the functionality that insured that there was absolutely no transaction history on a dispenser address BTC or XCP
-
How big of a footprint is the ord indexing? Fednode footprint already pretty big with having to store the entire btc blockchain and addrindexrs… while I’m supportive of collaboration, not sure it is worth it if it increeases the difficulty/cost of running a node…. Need to be convinced that :
A) brings great value to the CP beyond some simple tweaks and
b) that the fednode stack will not grow become risky harder/larger to maintain… (think POW ETH nodes… normies can’t run them, they require HUGE amount of disk space and CPU)
IMO It is important that anyone can stand up a cp fednode on a relatively normal computer with a couple terabytes of disk space
As the guy who runs most of the fednode servers, I am aware of what a pain keeping the fednode up/active can be… counterblock stopping parsing, addrindexrs index becoming corrupted and needing a reparse, counterwallet always needing restarted, etc.. adding yet another component to maintain (especially one with a large disk footprint and high cpu processing costs) is something I am apprehensive to do.
I like the idea of collaborating with ordinals to allow some sort of interoperability … but, I am not sold on the fact that we should bloat the default fednode install to run ordinals index… at least not in the default install… perhaps a new “ordinals” install type is more appropriate, so only those who want to run ordinals index have to.
Can you clarify exactly what benefits we get by running ordinals indexer in fednode and how/why that is better than just tweaking CP a bit to handle the envelope creation/destruction method you were describing?
I have not played with ordinals much yet, so pls forgive my ignorance -
I’m honestly hesitant to share my opinions or questions in the other group because there’s a real fear of being banned or trolled. I’m also not interested in the whole 'who’s got the bigger wallet' competition—that’s not what Counterparty should be about.
That’s why I’m only bringing this up here, hoping for genuine answers to genuine questions. -
In regards to this, I forwarded one of your arguments against yourself
-
Earlier you said disk space is not so important, but now 40+ nodes are up and running vs what we had last year
-
Used my own arguments against me? Because addrindexrs has a large footprint? As I already said, it can easily be replaced by running electrum servers (in fact, Juan has already proven this and runs an electrum replacement)…. I fail to see the argument being made here.
Functionality was still lost, and could be restored, without the need to keep addrindexrs 🤷🏻♂️ -
But the need to add and do other new shit
-
Dispensers still function, they just became more expensive to use
-
So the removed functionality argument is weak
-
@c0rnh0li0, I’d really appreciate it if you could share my genuine questions in the other group. You seem to have some standing there and can ask without the same risk of being banned or trolled. I realize these questions might be uncomfortable to answer, but they’re important.
-
Making it much easier to run a node is worth it
-
why would u change the way weve done it for 10 years for no reason other than to be spiteful
-
Check Adams’s history n plans on GitHub bro…. Using electrum n integrating its dependency into CP is already on the roadmap.
My point is the functionality did not need to be removed now, address indexers could be removed, and replaced with electrum (which Adam plans on doing anyway) and dispensers could continue to operate the ‘origin’ functionality.
The choice to remove dysfunctionality was Adam’s decision and not a necessity -
This is wrong
-
we are moving to atomic swaps... literally no need to fuk with anything that was working. wasted energy for what?
-
Read above… not a weak argument🤷🏻♂️
-
The end function still exists to open a dispenser on an empty address. You can daisy chain your transactions and get it confirmed in one block even.
-
Personally, I would prefer that all components that counterparty uses be installed in the node, but if he wants to rely on an external service like electrum servers, which is his plan, that is his right….. however that can be done without losing dispenser ‘origin’ functionality….. imo the argument for removing it is a weak argument
-
So 3 txs instead of one…. More expensive, n time consuming…. But perfectly fine with u… got it. Thx for sharing your viewpoint
-
I mean, we’ve made our requests very clear.
Restore functions as they were to the 2.0
If this is done, we become one again.
If not, well FAFO.
🤷♂️ -
-
-
Can still get it done in one block, no time lost
-
-
There’s like a dozen of your q team here and JDog
-
-
3times more expensive tho 🤷🏻♂️
-
-
Good way to phase out a security vulnerability
-
Brilliant actually
-
caused me a lot of problems? Not really…. Other than the reputational credit that has been sacrificed in order of standing up for what I believe in….. which is that this should remain a decentralized community where the users have a voice… I won’t lose much else…. And I made peace with that a long time ago.🤷🏻♂️
Some things are more important than being right or being seen as a hero in everyone’s eyes. 🤷🏻♂️ -
we stand on truth and consensus from the community not boot licking degens
-
Says the person who seems to judge others only by the size of their wallet. I expected answers from you that matched the level of my questions, which were genuine and asked with real awareness. Instead, this was your only response—pretty disrespectful.
-
many of us putting together nodes for 9.6 too
-
🤣🤣🤣New Coke was the unofficial name of a reformulation of the soft drink Coca-Cola, introduced by the Coca-Cola Company in April 1985. It was renamed Coke II in 1990, and discontinued in July 2002
Classic FTW -
You have a very loud voice
If you were so worried about X, you should of helped solve X -
I have to go now - I’ll check back in on this later on
-
Pritty sad really, and to mute me for asking if the ban was warranted lol
-
Know your clitorus?
-
did you just assume my gender
-
And once again it’s worth repeating that all of this drama could very easily be solved by the core devs, either restoring origin dispenser, functionality or implementing replay protection, so that the transactions on counterparty classic do not affect their new version of counterparty 2.0….. that would allow them very easily to march forward with their features and their ledger and their community, and avoid all this drama.
They are the ones who made the changes that caused the ledger fork , yet they refuse to claim responsibility, listen to the community, or make changes which can end all of the confusion and frustration by many.
Users can see the core dev‘s actions and my actions and formed their own opinions.
I stand behind my entire history with counterparty, and provide a way for users who are interested to view the history
j-dog.net/archive -
Maybe they are on the Epstein list...
Diddy maybe?
Something fuggen wreaks.. -
-
Did somebody say Epstein?
-
-
Crystal
-
Fuggen planned.
-
Voters.....
-
-
Also need to add there " big-bag wallet balls" for the woman on right . The more income = the more rights .
-
-
If you feel the need to silence those with whom you disagree, 👀
You reveal much about the validity of your position. -
-
King of counterparty 🤔
-
-
So the latest versions of counterparty will continue to roll out, and Jdog will provide tools to interact with two versions of counterparty. Will there be a guide to help users accomplish what they want using older versions of counterparty while not affecting what they don’t want affected on the newest versions of counterparty? Not that I will be doing any of this, just wondering.
-
1361 members, 209 online here
ratio the new channel? -
Until replay protection is enabled, actions done on either Counterparty 2.0 or Counterparty Classic will effect both ledgers, unfortunately.... Best to stick on Counterparty 2.0 if you dont want to have any issues, or if you use Counterparty Classic, and want to be "safe" until replay protection is enabled... avoid using dispensers on Classic.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
It's big waves we wait for calmer waters
-
Ppl can continue to use "FreeWallet 2.0" to safely transact on "Counterparty 2.0" and completely ignore the "Counterparty Classic" version/ledger... So, I highly doubt people will just entirely stop using FreeWallet / Tokenscan. My primary focus is on building xchain platform, but I'll still be around and maintaining "FreeWallet 2.0" so users can continue to use a wallet they know and trust to transaction on "Counterparty 2.0".... The community is a lot bigger than just the voices here on telegram.
-
-
I suggest we avoid sinking to the level of trolls. Instead, let’s keep the focus on fundamental questions and important decisions, as some people from both sides have started to do today. Just putting it out there , bro ! ;)
-
-
-
My questions are still have not answers btw. Would like to see some answers , cos on those answers will be building some trust also ;)
-
I think the pressure valve had a good release. Things already settling down
-
I think 1.) was addressed by Adam... sec digging for msg... will forward
-
Which is fine but Core Devs have a conflict of interest against current tooling that supports an overwhelming majority of the community. So intentionally making things harder for competing wallets banning other devs does not seem in the best interest of the community.
-
-
So there are two different potential conflicts of interest that I (Adam) see. The first is the possibility of supporting Unspendable Labs' business over the interests of the community (e.g. Horizon Wallet + Explorer over other wallets and explorers). The second is that the entities funding the company Unspendable Labs could push the protocol development in a way that favors their own interests.
The second question is easy to answer: the existing funding for UL comes 100% from (1) myself, (2) the Bitcoin Frontier Fund (who have made their investment public), and (3) close friends and family (whose names I won't disclose)
The first question is harder to answer. Yes, there's a potential conflict of interest. It's possible that I personally could push to change the protocol in a way that favors the UL business. That's possible in any case where someone who leads development of a community project also runs a business that makes use of that project. All I can really say here that UL and I are much more incentivized to make Counterparty successful than to increase UL's short-term revenue. That's why 100% of Counterparty development is done out in the open, including all issue tracking and prioritization, and why Horizon Wallet is fully open-source. -
-
Also good question .
-
-
-
It would have been best if operative-people from both sides got into a private channel and sorted it out so that a fork could be avoided
-
There’s still time? Or is it too late for that?
-
-
Not much to discuss unfortunately, the core devs viewpoint has never shifted, not once, from their viewpoint is correct, even in the face of a ledger fork, community chaos, and the option to resolve all of this by restoring some functionality. If there was any sign of compromise by core devs, I would tend to agree, but I have seen none of that through all of the past 3 weeks. 🤷️️️️️️
-
Maybe it’s never too late. I don’t understand coding but I do understand that all of you are fab people and it will be to cp’s benefit for all to be on the same page. I’m just someone who has collected some jpegs here over the years and I’d love to see the community continue to thrive. New features old features don’t matter much in the long run as long as the community stays united and healthy. Sorry if it sounds sermonizing but I think the ugly public chat is not doing much good, message to both sides, again: see if u guys can get into a private channel and talk it out
-
-
@yodark thanks for the comment. I also think that v10.4.0 was way too big of a release. :/ we've introduced too many bugs, and along with a massive spike in number of users + transactions, that's caused problems for long-time users who have very reasonable expectations of stability for Counterparty. the reason we made it so big was specifically to minimize regressions in functionality. we also weren't able to test sufficienty well on testnet because it's been under attack for a while. we absolutely could have done better though. we spent nine months preparing for adding the first new features. unfortunately that wasn't enough. if you look at our roadmap, we're very much focusing on bugfixes and testing going forward.
-
Post office horizon scandal, wounder why they chose horizon
-
-
agree, not much good has come from all the screaming and accusation slinging on both sides. Open to a private channel, if invited by core devs who are willing to be open to compromise... otherwise, not much point, all the compromise thus far has been on "our" side, losing functionality the users continue to desire (dispenser origin functionality).... I appreciate your viewpoint 🙂
-
for reference these are the clowns funding the new fork of 2.0... stacks, runes, staking lol
-
-
Btw , the XCP is still needed for creating fairmints, etc ?
-
for creating the asset yes
-
You may need to Google post office horizon scandal to get the reference
-
But horizon and postofficeparty are a great partnership
-
-
-
I appreciate you trying to bridge the divide and be a voice of reason, but as you can see, it requires both sides to engage in good faith... which IMO is not possible with the current situation.
-
sad
-
-
Since when is electrum no middleware?
-
it is, and having CP depend on a 3rd party service/component NOT included in the default CP install is IMO, not a good idea.... addrindexrs is not ideal, but it is at least installed in the stack when counterparty is installed... perhaps they will add electrum into the stack in the future... but AFAIK, from conversations i've seen, the plan is to just have core run some electrum servers and depend on those always being up/available for CP to interact with 🤷️️️️️️
-
I’m playin with electrs.
Works fine, and decoupling it from core makes sense. It can be kept as an interface though, like mempool does
https://mempool.space/docs/faq#address-lookup-issuesThe Mempool Open Source Project®Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with The Mempool Open Source Project®. See the real-time status of your transactions, get network info, and more.
-
Spoke too early 😆. Looking back at the core code the integration with addrindrs is already implemented like an interface. It used to be indexd.
The same could be done with electrs I think -
Now they cheer to have no middleware like cp2mysql (tho addrindexrs is still not killed yet not sure?) But why would they contradict themselve and add middleware later back?
-
dispensers take 5 blocks to close
-
he obvi hasnt been around that much
-
as Shaban points out, the "middleware" does stuff that the native CP API does not do, like calculate market/asset prices based off past trading/order/dispenser history... and does not even take into account all the "index" optimizations in cp2mysql.... Mysql / MariaDB with indexed data is WAY faster than postgres... sure you CAN run using just the CP API, but it is not very efficient, and you have to spin up many nodes to support queries under load... when you COULD just put all that data into an efficient database (exactly what cp2mysql does)..... Way back in the early days, there was an explorer run by the same guy who built/runs etherscan.io .... He queried the CP database directly, and complained all the time about how inefficient the database was... when I decided to build xchain, I had to build counterparty2mysql to pull the data from CP into an efficient database... Sure optimizations have been made to the database in the latest versions of counterparty 2.0.... but they still dont' have indexed addresses/assets/transactions, which means their indexes are nowhere near as fast as numeric index lookups.
-
-
They also contradicted themselves when they said that no one should ever use/trust bootstraps... that downloading bootstraps of the ledger was bad form (when CP was doing it for many many years)... they touted their kickstart version as the best way to parse the full ledger super fast and no one would need to use a bootstrap anymore... tho, come release time, low and behold, back to downloading/using bootstrap versions of the ledger 🤷️️️️️️ Tough to keep track of their viewpoints as they are constantly shifting and contradicting former viewpoints.
-
-
Not a good look
-
-
lol id rather not have to sign up for second job to pay rent
-
-
-
-
-
SRCPad | Official Launchpad of SRC-20 (@srcpad_pro) on X
🛍 FireMints Marketplace Reopens: Start Trading Again! 🛍 After carefully analyzing the edge case detected in Counterparty, we’ve concluded that the potential issues it may cause are less significant than the ease of performing frontrunning in dispensers by malicious agents and
-
good way to alienate a community... maybe thats the goal
-
Proof of stake
-
OK I havent read up in 3000 messages- TLDR? people still fighting and bugs still being worked out, correct?
-
Nice art
Is it yours? - 31 October 2024 (518 messages)
-
learn a little about the first Counterparty user created token, TEST
https://x.com/davesta_xcp/status/1851792914789339555davesta.xcp (@davesta_xcp) on XThe first user created token using @CounterpartyXCP was the TEST token. Initially TEST had no text, image, audio or any data associated with it. Years later when this historical token was re-found, the creator of the asset decided to add some key information and some community
-
Thanks for posting this awesome read!
-
FreeWallet (@FreeWallet) on X
Happy to announce the release of version 2.0.0 of FreeWallet Desktop wallet for Windows, Macintosh, and Linux. This update resolves Counterparty 2.0 API stability issues, dispenser issues, and more! #Bitcoin #Counterparty $XCP #Freewallet https://t.co/s4jRuSilpM
-
Release FreeWallet v2.0.0 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Release Notes Add tag as required field to /compose/destroy Updates to detect BTC payment to address with open dispenser Updated MPMA sends support new memo format (CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-co...
-
LOL.
it doesnt matter how many TX honestly,
if your dispenser is opened with one TX and you paid less fess- as i buyer i dont give a F*CK.
ALL I WANT as a buyer is to buy asset safe. thats it.
so basically your "functionality" has to be eliminated asap because you probably have no idea how much money people lost using your "great" "functionalities". or do you?
has anyone here have at least a slightest idea of the loss sizes?
so shut the F up and let others do the job that you was bad at. -
i have same fear on this group and i know i will be muted for having another opinion
-
DO NOT INSTALL this crap.
nobody tested or audited it. -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
in short words: accusations without a proof should never reached day light at all, and i shouldnt be defending myself now. but this is so difficult to understand that none of dozen moderators can.
What is that mean? it means two options:
1. group ran by criminals.
2. crimes against their "enemies" are allowed -
next time if someone think they can "do tests" on mainchain buying 1xcp sizes from my dispenser and later force me to "refund" on congested network and to pay fees from my pocket- they can go fuck themself.
i am not a test rat. any complain they can address to tools creator.
i do not owe anyone a cent.
hope we are clear and hope nobody will be in need of me.
IF any error will ever happen in the future, first ill teach them to admit whoes error was that, and ONLY after that i will "refund" them something and fees will be on them or someone who are responsible for that to happen. i as a seller use same tools, same explorers, same wallets- i do not have an edge. i cant make something not to work what they might think i can. so basically all complains has to be addressed to the providers of services they have used. -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
fool! they didnt even knew they was buying from me 🤣 because they came to the chat and asked where they bought from.
so HOW could they have been trusting me you mfer?
they were trusting TOOLS, WALLET and services that they use to work and give them what was been said ON THOSE TOOLS/WALLETS to be given. does your little stinky head understands that???
They were trusting the writings on their screen! it was not otc trade you dumb ass -
-
this message is on the chat just because he is jdog friend?
and you dear to say that on the other CP chat they censor you??
who let this weasel to talk to me like this? -
-
-
-
-
No
-
-
-
this
-
here
-
-
-
-
check the date and time
-
on these posts.
i was first to WARN.
so basically from HERO to THIEF and all done by great mods.
such a nice painting you painted out of me.
i do more transactions than all mods combined so it is normal that i noticed the first. instead of listening to what i say they took it as "freewallet" hate because everybody should love it , even when people lose money using it. -
-
another "auto delete" "rate limited" "human banning" bullshit. only this message auto deleting makes me sick. i wrote all the points of why none of devs where right on CP2.0 and gave my advices of voting implementations and of why WE USERS has to be cared too.
unspendable ARE not right demanding migration with the offer of crapy wallet that doesnt even have basic bitcoin functions or graphics thats very important to CP users. not even talking about missing of 80% CP functionality.
jdog side are not right thinking that wallet that gives most of the functions but making errors when functioning are OK- its not ok. Having all functions are brilliant, but its not brilliant when those functions dont work or needs high level understanding of what to do.
right move was to ask us: users
you made this to be your "revenge" playground and now all the users suffer. -
-
-
Yeah, I was reading that
-
-
Anyways, all of this over $0.40 savings to open a dispenser
-
I have personally helped recover well into 5-figures worth of BTC for individuals
-
-
Mostly noobs who will never use Counterparty again afterwards
-
YES
-
-
Now JDog is opening the door to a big new scam
-
To save a handful of folk $0.40
-
-
-
-
-
if money lost while using CP wallets were spent to develop new wallet/marketplace we could have hired magic eden guys and had bulletproof exchange of goods today.
-
So much money and time lost
-
And confidence from newcomers
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CounterWallet, servers are down… some issue related to reorg and parsing the dispenser closes properly… Javier looking into it and it should be fixed by Monday
-
-
Remember CounterWallet?
-
-
Dispensers killed that too
-
Talk about loss of functionality
-
counterwallet had one function that none of other wallets have or at least i dont know to have. for example as far as i remember counterwallet was the only one to show what ownership rights your address hold. take my main addy, it has at least 3, and there is no way to see that on wallets we use today. basically i have to know that.
but again devs didnt noticed this because they dont use their own wallets or dont use network, they just talk. -
It worked on mobile too
-
Freewallet censored me initially while trying to create CCSATOSHI. Counterwallet allowed it.
-
$0.40
-
FW is blocking real human interaction- there is 0% it will survive with this "function".
000000%
how rate limiting people helps us to achieve popularity?
when said devs dont use the wallet themself i mean it, because there is no chance to work on it, its is designed so you can click on it just a few times, if you click more than few times you become a robot/bot.
show me a single other wallet that would "rate limit" me while using bitcoin.
the only limit is of how much btc i have. that should be the only limit of how many times i can interact. -
-
-
-
-
i should not be limited as long as i have bitcoin to pay network fees. bitcoin is fair network not without the reason. and it doesnt need your "skills" of understanding humans here. or maybe you became a doctor.
btw if you think your servers are too much for my 10 clicks to handle then may i ask on what server this billions worth network is "secured"?
on 50$ amazon?
or laptop?
thats 10 clicks! im not asking much.
there is no action on the network at all and you stop me from bringing it. -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
of how i understand:
you/other devs have implemented numeric assets minting at zero xcp cost.
people started to use the function for the first time since its creation.
you shut the service down taking all the assets in to hostage and asked for a bribe. and since then limiting usage of people and rate limiting tokenscan and FW users -
of course its not me who has FW backend and if dispenser havent triggered they should be contacting you or the mailbox at your services.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
No one shut any service down, or limited numeric devs in anyway, simply objected to their over usage of numerics by voice, and 90 to 95% of the community agreed with putting a fee on numeric.
Also, I am not to blame for the fork , nor should people be contacting me for lost funds on dispensers, as the issue was in counterpart-core, where users were unable to create dispenses due to things not functioning as they were supposed to.
Maybe take the time to actually read the release notes and understand what they mean rather than continuing with the blame J-Dog for everything rant while I sleep🤷🏻♂️
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/releases/tag/v10.6.0
“The bug prevents users from triggering dispensers at addresses where there have previously been closed dispensers (rather than simply re-opened dispensers).”
Pretty clear if you take the time to actually read rather than just continue to rant🤷🏻♂️Release v10.6.0 · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-coreRelease Notes - Counterparty Core v10.6.0 (2024-10-25) This release includes a protocol change to fix a regression for the case when there have been multiple dispensers opened at a single address. ...
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
dude you are lucky you are "blamed" while you sleep because some people were accused as scammers while muted.
-
-
-
Why not ignore Stack rather than ignoring me and my comments that directly address your main issue with the update?
-
its more comfortable
-
-
-
-
-
I'll post some of my comments again. It's not much. I try to keep it concise and to the point.
-
Anyways, all of this over $0.40 savings to open a dispenser
I have personally helped recover well into 5-figures worth of BTC for individuals
Mostly noobs who will never use Counterparty again afterwards
Now JDog is opening the door to a big new scam
To save a handful of folk $0.40 -
https://j-dog.net/archive/OfficialCounterpartyChat/2023-12.html#2023-12-09
Another reminder of the fact that Dispensers killed CounterWallet. This happened before the founders were back in the picture, fyiPage 1 - Dec 2023 - Official Counterparty Chat - Telegram message archive.Official Counterparty Chat - - Telegram message archive.
-
-
lol again "rate limited" by the great devs. wanted to show messages of where they agreed that thats buyers fault. and messages got deleted.
dont expect much from such people
yet again what buyers has to do beside buying and hoping it will be as it is written on their screens? only "asking" to do something else is wrong attitude -
-
-
Your practice is to ban people who are angry at you and want to escalate critical issues.
And there is no way to not to be angry while communicating with such mods. or else i have to lower my IQ to get to those levels so you could understand what i say.
basically you cant even understand whos error was that or that accusation without proof is a crime and etc. simple principles of life
so how can we expect they will fix errors if they do not understand main cause of it.
also as mantioned earlier jdog front ran rarepepe card order adopting "gaps" in protocol and still winning the card with the edge ;)
there was an order , someone matched it , jdog pushed his "tx" in the front even knowing he was the LAST to buy.
what do you expect from such devs? development? they are busy applying great "functionality" and trading against you.
if someone who bought first was delayed to the next block, it was debatable, but all tx confirmed in to the same block. and jdog was LAST to broadcast. so basically he used what i see as an error of protocol to his advantage. yet again what do we expect from them? -
now with all the respect. this 👆
-
You are so banned, how the hell are you able to type
-
It's 0.2 and other groups that ban people for simple comments
-
-
-
Not how it works, if ur banned you can't rejoin
-
yeah i bet accusation guy still not banned yet, right?
-
-
i said i quit not to be banned. do you listen hhaa
-
You keep claiming your banned, but I'm reading your words
-
muted/banned what ever
-
-
-
-
So the dispenser issue happened recently right?
-
i was the first to call it
-
-
-
-
When?
-
If someone does or does not buy any asset it implies nothing tbh
-
here
-
Did u share in 2.0 aswell
-
And dev chat
-
-
-
-
-
not my job. you read it. you share it.
i can say.
did you asked me to share? -
-
Is a counterparty core issue no? Only stamp ninja was running 9.6 before the last 24 hours
-
-
You claim you informed first, probs didn't inform correctly, should have raised issue on guthub or directed your questions to the current devs?
-
-
-
-
But then again current devs were in this chat, then left, they don't really listen to the community anyway
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I think you have benifited from mistakes of dispensers also like when a seller accidentally sells too cheap, if I'm not mistaken you refused to return due to being sellers fault?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Yes or no?
-
yet again. i do not have to defend myself or waste my time. accusations has to have proof
-
-
if i would accuse you of 1000 crimes would you spend next 5 years defending yourself. yes or no?
-
That's a yes then
-
-
-
-
-
I only asked one question, never accused you of anything
-
-
-
-
-
But u expect answers and to be listened to
-
-
-
I asked one question
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
So I'm assuming it was you that scored multiple times when a seller accidentally sold at low price, rather than return like the majority of us do and have done
-
what a piece of shit
-
-
-
If it wasn't you an easy no it wasn't me will do, don't need proof just an answer lol
-
-
-
-
-
OK mate, use your time raging here instead of at the current devs
-
-
-
-
-
If you think I care about your fuck off you can go fork yourself
-
-
-
Seems I touched a nerve, must be some truth in what I said?
-
-
-
-
You are the one raging
-
-
For my 1 question lol
-
i dont answer questions
-
U can leave and take a breather
-
-
-
We hope that the self-imposed isolation of developers will speed up the processes)
-
good question, i don't know
-
a good moderation of the chat.
may i ask ALL the mods of why that piece of shit is still on the chat after writing that? or when you wake up from sleep will mute me to make it "easier" ?
yet again. only the understanding by them that someone has to go and defend themself after accusations is so sick that makes me vomit when i realise thats the people we trust our keys with.
message not deleted. proof havent been asked or pulled to public to grant the words. yet it sank in the chat on my name hoping its me who will do all the "job" and beg you to review? F YOU! -
All the chat mods are degens that can not be trusted because they mute or attack people based on "whos friend is he" rule.
and the form of their attack is : thief, scammer and other shit just because WALLET THAT THEIR FRIEND DEVELOPED IS SHIT AND DOESNT WORK AS IT SHOULD. -
and if any of you brainlets has spent time for a second to look at the chain you would have noticed that i refunded and refund everything all the time, you mfers.
it was my principle for you to understand the cause of error! and those xcp were refunded weeks ago while you talked all this time. i just told you mfer i dont answer questions for you again to understand that i have to be asked or else i might "find no time".
i checked onchain, refunded 8 days ago. so it means ALL THIS time while you was barking and i was silent - there were nobody who lost a cent with me. Seriously you can all go f yourself -
-
-
-
Yes, please only ban other people that give accusations
-
-
I can accuse but not be accused
-
-
-
i gave all the proof
-
-
-
-
So u can accuse without proof?
-
look fking prick
-
-
-
-
-
Yeah, your proof is, if you say so, we all believe you, got it!
-
-
go and ask rarepepetrader
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I see alot of accusations without delving into each one
-
-
let mods post pictures
-
-
-
-
-
I can't ban anyone
-
-
-
Engaging in your rants
-
But have to go now now, let's do this again sometime
-
-
-
-
-
-
Wins wat, a stack award?
-
-
-
You never answered 1 question, I don't expect answers
-
we getting better
-
-
-
Soon you will understand that you need to wipe now and again
-
everything you do is BETA
-
-
-
And u have pink fanny hair
-
-
If you was so big you wouldn't mind refunding fees for 1 xcp
-
Obviously some little fees are harmful to you
-
-
-
-
Such a big player, I'm graced to be in your presence
-
-
wanna bet
-
-
-
-
Let's vote if you should change your fanny hair to orange
-
-
-
-
-
If that was true there wouldn't be all these trolls
-
-
-
True wat, read your own words
-
-
-
I am nowhere near your spotty pink haired face, how about you go play with your wet minge
-
-
-
-
-
-
I don't want anything from you, you don't work for me
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Good, now your learning how to raise concerns, now go to 2.0 chat and raise funcunality of 2.0 concerns there :)
-
-
-
-
raid this onee, Kevin the COO of Ctrl_wallet playing again with Counterparty https://x.com/kevinhbeardsley/status/1851957152769831142Kevin Beardsley (@kevinhbeardsley) on X
.@CounterpartyXCP is fun again! Minted $MINTS and got some $MYSTERYBOX both on https://t.co/wzZe8XvZLt by @Universelle_io. ngl got no clue what Mysterybox does, but aped bc @mikeinspace tweeted it. i rly hope it's a boat. it's fun f*ing around on XCP again. i had missed it
-
-
-
-
my accusation is very simple.
he never sent me STACKBTC card, never ever. i can not show "nothing".
so my proof is on bloackchain that SATCKBTC asset was never moved to my address.
all forensic with normancomics addy and tx ids has been given to Niftyboss to review because the mods are censoring this group of me posting pictures or links. -
I mean there's multiple accusations, without delving into them all
-
-
they know if i said you are the scammer means you are. period.
-
this was about my friends
-
-
-
-
-
Suggests that once you call a scammer is cased closed, you are free to accuse, but if ever accused of doing something wrong, your attitude changes
-
-
-
-
lol… Jesus two hours later and you’re still on your tirade….. and no one has muted you or kicked you for being very disrespectful and spamming the chat for four hours with your nonsense….. but the moderator in here are the problem because they censor people… lol. Got it.
I got better things to do than to engage with you and you’re nonstop ranting, and raving 🤷🏻♂️ -
-
-
you are 10 years on the wallet that doesnt function and cant even admit it.
-
That comment was not in relation to that accusation, but nvm if you can't understand me
-
-
-
Once again, moderators are not deleting your chat… the anti-spam bots are seeing you as an abusive spammer since you’re just nonstop, titrating and posting nonsense, just like scammers do, and so the bot is deleting your comments🤷🏻♂️
Maybe slow down, gather your thoughts, and write what you want to say rather than just rambling on forever, bro🤷🏻♂️ -
-
-
-
-
i will ramble as long as i need to help my 0.1 find home
-
-
Please continue
-
oh wow! it took you two hours to learn word please
-
And you still only have negative words for me, let's see how long it takes
-
im not going to entertain you. i said what i wanted. just of you thinking i did something bad and such makes me wanna keep you far away from me. especially when you thought its ok i have to waste my time defending myself. take care and good day to all.
ill leave the chat to avoid ban. will be back if it will get too boring without me. -
Please sir, I want to be entertained