https://twitter.com/rarepepenews/status/1785488706050371634
here's a question I have just posed to the NFT archaeology community...
- 01 May 2024 (41 messages)
-
RarePepeNews (@rarepepenews) on XOpen question to the #NFT archaeologists Is NUMERAIAI from the 2017 #Memorychain collection 10,000 issuance the earliest NFT with "Artificial Intelligence" on the artwork? #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #digitalart #Counterparty https://t.co/UyuoptjrrJ
-
Wow 🤩 thanks a lot, I got my btc back I really appreciate it. 🤗🚀 -
When will we be able to use our counter party wallets again? -
There’s freewallet and Rarepepewallet.wtf, why do people want to use counterwallet? -
If I remember correctly, counterwallet had a really high minimum fee also
-
Not everyone is comfortable moving seeds from one web wallet to another mostly because it’s a terrible practice. -
And rarepepe no Foss 😔 -
I get it, feel the same way. But always felt comfortable going from counterwallet to freewallet.
-
I don’t remember seeing any configurations on the user side making it possible to lower the minimum fee. Could def be wrong.
-
I remember logging into couterwallet for the first time and seeing my birthday as the terms and conditions date.
I felt like it was universe calling me to CP 😂 -
You can't use half the features in those wallets. You can't disable pictures when it gets slow. You only get the pictures of certain projects -
RPW has added Stamps support which is nice. Definitely the best option.
-
RPW.WTF that is.
-
Pepe.wtf has always been very clunky, hopefully the cp updates remedy that
-
What do you mean? Seems like it’s always been great
-
Perhaps it was just my devises
-
I definitely think that you deserve the help of the community I would love to help, but my bitcoin is on counterparty and I’m an older gentleman and it’s just seems easier. I’m not as smart as you guys, but I liked it before because it was easy to get into an easy to use.
-
👍👊🫵 Good.
-
What do you cats mean by Bitcoin on counterparty?
-
Or in counterparty?
-
Forgive if it's stupid question 🙏
-
Now I get it.
Was wondering if gangster put all BTC into XCP 🪖 -
-
And learn 🪖
-
Get out of our own way and learn. 🙏
Referring to me really 😁 -
Sometimes I feel like I'm retarding the cause by asking questions, but figure, ask the questions do research, learn.
Mixed with humor -
Definitely no offense meant😁
-
You devs and cats in these few channels are front running the new way that energy will be stored and exchanged on earth, actual wizards. I humbled to even get to just read and learn. Can't help but ask retarded questions every so often
-
Big exchanges reacting to the barcelona event.
- 02 May 2024 (11 messages)
-
iOS it’s very nice and clean
-
When I trying to send multisend/dividends I still have a "Counterparty API communication error!" 😭
How to get around this problem? -
Looks like the orders works fine
-
https://davestaxcp.gitbook.io/freewallet.io-user-manual/troubleshooting-issues/counterparty-api-communication-error
It has to do with your Server settings and enabling SSL to yes -
That was corrected a long time already)
-
Will try on other device later
-
review your server settings for CP Host then.... newest update (for Reset to Default) is public.xchain.io and the other option is using api.counterparty.io .... also check your CP Port too
https://davestaxcp.gitbook.io/freewallet.io-user-manual/troubleshooting-issues/stuck-on-checking-data-encoding-fees -
-
Ser I’m not gonna click on each one just to find out what it is
- 03 May 2024 (12 messages)
-
PEPENEFRTITI | Series 15 Card 34 by ooakosimo
via FAKERARES (orange rarepepe series)
Total Supply: 48
Holders: 16
xcp trade order for 0.00555 btc
https://xchain.io/tx/93880f0e5eb0fac9c30f8e84c08260aaef410680e383f023612ae677991ff357
also made emblem vault -
-
3YR OLD DISPENSERS I MADE FOR MY ART IN COUNTERPARTY (REJECTED CARDS) CREATED BY OOAKOSIMO
DONUTBRIBE
https://xchain.io/tx/d432a6d5603b4a7cca0568f80fe2603051493e96133c32b18dfcee9728a965c9
CLOLVIB
https://xchain.io/tx/b2c9ef4b4eb87f4129deb811765845c6b7a127472d449d0da1c0d3b24282b6f5 -
-
-
-
🤷♂️
-
that interesting, I cant even send to any other addy only from my 1 huge wallet... :D other addys work fine, but... :D strange...
-
Will check after my vacation
-
strange.. would love to hear your process... might have to be an issue filed in the FW github - feel free to explain it in the FW chat and i can write up an issue in the github for ya
-
Ok, thanks, will check later again
- 04 May 2024 (1 messages)
-
LFG 🇺🇸
- 05 May 2024 (32 messages)
-
-
Haha it’s so bad man, it’s so shitty
-
Lmfaoo -
Got them all roundy this morning thanks to Binance
-
Binance (@binance) on X
Let's talk Bitcoin Stamps. What are they and how do they work? Your answers lie here ⤵️ https://t.co/z1GoLYrtWq
-
This got them all triggered
-
"Xcp, I think, "the counterparty token" "
-
-
-
-
lol
-
is it a link?
-
fuck
-
yes i guess its possible
-
but no
-
not trying to havk anyone
-
just sharing a pickleslice
-
yes
-
Rare Pickles
-
I like videos of cats jump scaring at pickles
-
same
-
this guy :)
-
-
- 06 May 2024 (26 messages)
-
Counterparty White Paper
https://krellenstein.com/adam/get/counterparty-whitepaper_2024-03-29.pdf
For the TLDR crowd (most of you?), here are some goodies I found in the "Future Development" section.
1. Deeper Integration with BTC
".....Counterparty will be able to provide seamless integration with the Bitcoin token: Counterparty assets will be able to be attached directly to UTXOs, allowing for them to be
held and transfered using standard Bitcoin wallet software."
" this upgrade will allow for trustless, atomic swaps between native Counterparty assets and BTC, such as Ordinals has. Indeed, it will be possible to trade Ordinals assets for Counterparty
assets as well."
2. Implementation of a General-Purpose Virtual Machine
"The Counterparty smart contracts language will address these limitations of existing systems, so as to bring general-purpose computation to the Bitcoin blockchain, and without the use of a sidechain. Naturally, XCP will serve as the gas token for computation and storage using this virtual machine, and fees will be dynamic based on network load." -
be on the watch out for @Edemilsonolive7, he's trying to do scam XCP buys with a fake escrow phishing link
-
hi guys i have a 4090gpu how much cions can i mining for a day ? -
Counterparty has no GPU mining
you might want to check out BasedAI by @PepeCoins -
only the asic can mining?
-
Counterparty has no mining
it was a one time Bitcoin burn event in early 2014 -
you can use your 4090 to contribute GPU compute to the BasedAI Cyan test net in the next few weeks probably... that's why I suggested @PepeCoins
-
Is there any reward?
-
Yes there will be Based token rewards once their new main net goes live.
Check out research.pepecoin.io -
Shaban Shaame (@shaban_shaame) on X✨The Bright future of Counterparty 2.0 I see a future where the creation of digital tokens, unique digital collectibles, and decentralized applications is as straightforward as launching a website. This empowerment will lead to a surge in creativity and entrepreneurship,…
-
That's cool. I wonder on what they will work, the protocol might be a little too much.
The explorer could be a good idea -
What do you mean by the protocol might be too much?
-
I’m curious how and why this is happening now.
-
what exchanges can you currently buy XCP on atm? -
What the core team is doing is complex and you don't find devs for that easily
-
Hey everyone! I hope you’re all well. I wasn’t wondering if someone could help me get a counterparty address? Thanks! -
Xcp.ninja now supports okx, unisat, leather
-
Limited to Dispenser buying I think.
-
More functions on stamped.ninja for minting
-
I remembered I have a freewallet. Is the Bitcoin address the same as Counterparty? To me this sounds right but I just wanna make sure
-
I’m green to interacting on counterparty
-
Yes. CounterParty uses your btc address
-
Ok thanks! I’ll stick with freewallet
-
There is already an open source libre explorer: https://github.com/CNTRPRTY/xcpdev-genesisGitHub - CNTRPRTY/xcpdev-genesis: Open Counterparty Bitcoin Data Explorer - DIY NodeOpen Counterparty Bitcoin Data Explorer - DIY Node - CNTRPRTY/xcpdev-genesis
-
Dankest, LLC (@Dankestllc) on XToday we are thrilled to announce the acquisition of XChain properties, including logo, https://t.co/rbbu12ddZL website, codebase, and pending trademark. These properties will be used to develop our new multi-chain XChain Platform. https://t.co/6yZ2jdcU77 #XChainPlatform #BTNS
- 07 May 2024 (141 messages)
-
-
what is best wallet rn for xcp? -
most people use Freewallet.io
https://www.counterparty.io/wallets -
-
What does this mean for counterparty?
-
It will still have a block explorer and FreeWallet… same as before… only differences that the explorer URL will be tokenscan.io instead of xchain.io👍🏻
-
hopefully, innovation and user-base grow -
Currently is only on dex-trade com
-
^
-
There's also an exchange only available in Japan
-
Otherwise you can use dispensers
-
Is that sarcasm? Lol or honest question
-
Casey, Ordinals/Runes founder
-
Funny watching it on repeat
-
Twitter was fun. Teasing Casey and Leondias, Leo is Casey's marketing and spaces dev dude
-
Got them all hurting. Especially after Binance wrote about Bitcoin Stamps
-
They doing their best not to even bring up CounterParty or stamps during their X Spaces.
-
He's probably paid to fud. And ignore CounterParty. Not In the best interest of Ordinals if CounterParty picks up traction,
-
Free advertising from my perspective
-
Get @teysol onto the Ordinals show with Trevor Owen and let the discussion between big brains go
-
Trevor Owen's always welcomes, would be a super easy audience to entertain
-
😀
-
Be more fun to drop 2.0 and make Runes irrelevant
-
Yes it is. It’s 2.0.
-
I was on The Ordinals Show yesterday talking about Counterparty
-
1H20M in I talk about CCSATOSHI, Counterparty, and STAMPS
https://x.com/LeonidasNFT/status/1787490552444862941Leonidas (@LeonidasNFT) on Xhttps://t.co/VNIqoxM992
-
I was chatting with Leo before, and he would like to have Counterparty devs come on and talk about PSBT once it’s live
-
Just listened. Leo made a very important (and pretty obvious point) near the end: until users can just click a button in xverse or unisat, Counterparty will continue to stay under the radar. Expecting users to jump through the amount of hoops necessary to interact with Counterparty (today) is a non-starter. The good news is that the roadmap looks promising and hopefully friction will be reduced soon.
-
Narrow is the path. Natural selection process can’t be disturbed quite yet -
The Stamp Wallet proves it can be. Select stamp, quantity, address, send
-
Will be cool when more Assets get support
-
It's interesting they see Ordinals as less friction, with the amount of lost funds
-
Stamp wallet is great but just the very idea of having to install yet another wallet is a lot of friction for users.
-
I think liquidity trumps all and users are willing to put up with a lot more if they see a profit incentive
-
Casino
-
I know I might loose. But I could win
-
-
This is cool and Stamp marketplaces do something similar with trusted-PSBT. I think the holy grail, tho, is trustless PSBT similar to how Ordinals can be traded on DEXes
-
Attaching assets to UTXOs
-
All the tooling is Ordinals-based at this point so you almost need to follow that approach to be integrated into marketplaces
-
Interesting… that’s going over my head, but maybe you can dumb it down.
-
No custodial risk?
-
Not custodial but coordinator
-
Different choice of word. But doesn't it achieve same?
-
So Bytedust isn't the fees for the platform? It's a token that represents instead?
-
Im forking counterparty
-
i made this card In honor to all the great work of Jdog
https://xchain.io/tx/a98386a46d01cc23206c71974d137cb1b787f6a5fcf6fd2ceb5d649b025d2c26 -
I agree. Being reactionary shouldn’t be the Counterparty way, we have the Lindy effect on our side.
CP users love it being address based. “Addys”.
And the UX will be affected because now assets will be either UTXO based or address based. Not sure how complex or if is even possible to make the transition between them seamless.
But… having said all this, if the implementation can be done in a way that does not over-complicate the current codebase, and the address based assets option stays “intact”, then I won’t mind it being added.
Is optional and actual usage will determine if it was worth it or not. -
Bruce Fenton (@brucefenton)
Almost *nine* years ago Overstock issued the first legally compliant securities token in the USA. Why don’t we now have thousands trading in a vibrant market with the US leading the world? For same reason so many other things are broken: anti market tyranny & regulation.
-
-
I'm taking Counterparty private at $420
-
🤝
-
there is gonna be a lot of chobani at the counterpartycash meetups
-
free chobani for all attendees
-
-
Probably not the first tweet secured by Bitcoin 😂
-
Should try to reduce those costs to $0
-
Are you a programmer also?
- 08 May 2024 (55 messages)
-
Many people, especially the youth, are getting sucked into the MATRIX.
-
-
Will Counterparty join the Bitcoin L2 race? 👀 -
CP isn't a L2 🤔
-
A lot of new Bitcoin "L2" are not really the L2s. L2 is just the general name for networks are getting built inside the Bitcoin's orbit.
-
Counterparty could become a big player.
-
A multisig is an L2 these days.
-
true
-
Imo L2 means the Blockchain is different from the L1
-
Only proofs exists in the L1
-
There are many "Bitcoin L2" that use ETH as the gas fee. That's funny, xd.
-
All People Seem to Need Data Processing -
that's the funny part about L2s :D
-
"we're not sidechains". Hum, yes you are
-
-
80 bytes
-
54 characters for a broadcast
-
Nm, 52
-
Jpj had 54 somewhere.
-
You could hash it
-
Thank you devs for kicking ass all over the place.
Save the world 🪖👊 -
LFG you guys are killing it
-
Hello @jdogresorg Your actual spread is 42%, please reduce it up to 2%. Thanks
-
Thank you for this info… I will pass it on to the community and hope that they place orders
-
i made this card In honor to all the great work of Jdog
https://xchain.io/tx/a98386a46d01cc23206c71974d137cb1b787f6a5fcf6fd2ceb5d649b025d2c26 -
what are the different end points into the xchain api?
seems like the on we are using is failing -
Not sure it’s related but there is some type of migration happening according to Jeremy Johnson CEO of Dankest, LLC.
-
Dankest, LLC (@Dankestllc) on X
Today we are thrilled to announce the acquisition of XChain properties, including logo, https://t.co/rbbu12ddZL website, codebase, and pending trademark. These properties will be used to develop our new multi-chain XChain Platform. https://t.co/6yZ2jdcU77 #XChainPlatform #BTNS
-
xD -
Someone known about something similar to XChain?
-
pepe.wtf (@pepe__wtf) on XThe PEPETRATION sale ends this SATURDAY at 420PM. There are only 28 left. Will one of them be yours? Do NOT miss your chance to acquire this 2016 Series 1 grail. https://t.co/4a2iyRXkQC
-
dankset dot io -
xcp.ninja
-
xcp.dev!
-
xcp.io
-
isnt it great we have a few explorers now fam :)
-
- 09 May 2024 (4 messages)
-
Looks, my addy is staggered because there's a tx with a low fee still on the maintenance)
-
That's pretty cool, but there's no one who have API?
-
https://www.xcp.dev/api
Note that not all calls are documented. But you can see what the website uses by inspecting the network requests by the browser.
The website is just another consumer of this public api. -
- 10 May 2024 (559 messages)
-
Garcia -
Max broadcast text in opreturn somewhere around 54 yes. I don't remember exactly.
The reason is that broadcasts also contain a numerical value, a fee fraction and a timestamp. It was originally designed to broadcast betting feeds. -
Makes me wonder if Augur has been used in the last 7 years
-
how often do yall use non-counterparty wallets (such as Electrum) or old versions of wallets (such as Freewallet) to *buy* from a dispenser?
if so, might wanna look at this future protocol change:
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-core/issues/1670Make `dispense` a Normal Counterparty Transaction · Issue #1670 · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-coreNo longer allow a normal Bitcoin transaction to trigger a dispense; require the CNTRPRTY prefix. This will prevent users from using a vanilla Bitcoin wallet to acquire Counterparty assets, but such...
-
@pork_chop77 @subterranean1 @g0barry @robotlovecoffee thoughts?
-
The oracles are probably the reason for that if I remember my docs correctly.
-
that isnt even allowed with current protocol. this is for buyers using other wallets like Electrum (that offer better features for UTXO's, RBF and CPFP) in the event of a mempool spike on large purchases
-
that is probably the solution, but wish we had it now and before this change happens imo
-
It impacts more than simply filling a dispenser. It also impacts buying from a dispenser.
-
exactly
-
One thing I'm not clear about: how will the CP wallet know that its sending to a dispenser in order to set the CP header?
-
So to buy or sell XCP have to have CP wallet?
No more FreeWallet?? -
Phew
-
Had me nervous🤣
-
It's early and I'm retarded
-
A new version of Freewallet will have to be released and any user that is using an older version will not be able to initiate buys with dispensers using the dispensers tab (which is just simply a BTC send)
-
if users dont update, their dispenses wont happen
-
if protocol is pushed in original post
-
what if users simply use an older version without knowing? .... say for instance Bobby Zoo or Jason Williams buy using v0.9.29 of FW without knowing there was a change
-
I usually just copy paste the dispenser address into send funds tab. That sounds like it will still work then?
-
nope
-
unless you upgrade.
-
im not against the upgrade. seems like its needed for the codebase. the users just have to be extra informed its going to happen
-
and there will be people who use the "old" function
-
id be fine with that, seems like the right solution @jdogresorg
-
we will also have to warn users who commonly use Electrum
-
How soon this all going down?
-
and ill have to update the FW user manual
-
-
👍
So without the FreeWallet upgrade there will be no way to dispense or get from dispensers XCP, Pepe's?
Just making sure I understand. -
all wallets will have to be upgraded
-
all of these https://www.counterparty.io/wallets
-
if someone is using an older version and tried to connect to the counterparty API, will that transaction be allowed to be broadcasted?....
other than a popup in the wallet - is there any other barrier or warning that could be implemented?
i know for things like orders and token creation this would make some sort of sense, but because Dispenses are BTC transactions without extra OP_RETURN data.... these dispenses on "non-upgraded" wallets would result in loss of funds (if the dispenser creator didnt give it back) -
if its good for the codebase and xcp wallets upgrade (which most of us use anyway) I get it will be fine. and most likely for the better.... just something that community will have to be extra extra aware of. We are very very used to having a simple btc tx initiate buys from dispensers (and its why coinbase and other centralized wallets hold xcp tokens... people mistakenly dispense their own tokens because of it)
-
any documentation written on using dispensers will have to be changed and the authors will have to be notified imo
-
I think there is excitement for this release. But also just a general concern for those less technically savvy or clued in on protocol changes. Some education and outreach to be done.
-
this small change will effect alot of people if wallet devs dont do this mandatory upgrade popup ^ .... and again, im not against fixing the codebase or making things better finally... Rugspensers has been in discussion for a very long time with various things presented by JPJA and other devs on how to 'fix it' in various posts on the XCP forums and Github... im not against this fix... im just saying if not handled correctly, unaware users could lose funds - especially in the case of advanced users preferring to use Electrum for buying from Dispensers
-
it would be nice for us to have an xcp wallet with the nice features of Electrum before this change happens, but if it has to be done, education is key. Like informing users on twitter and anywhere else they stay in touch.... and bright RED and SCARY popups for users
-
im happy we are having the discussion though, dont take me the wrong way
-
and then the narrative is "omg isn't it so nice that the best Counterparty wallet is a Bitcoin wallet that looks like this" 🙈
-
what i am saying is that despite having these scary popups in FW, user click past them all the time... a "mandatory upgrade" has never been implemented in FW before.... it could look very scary for OG's.... it would be very new to them.... they are usually invited to upgrade as it fixes bugs... theyve never been locked out of using the old versions before
-
it is simply because we can really really control our tx's and speed them up manually if need be
-
i would LOVE that
-
" it could look very scary for OG's.... it would be very new to them.... they are usually invited to upgrade as it fixes bugs... theyve never been locked out of using the old versions before"
-
im simply trying to imagine someone who came back after 6 months and instead of the popup stating "A New Version of Freewallet is Avaliable!" says "Please update to the recent version as Dispenses on the old version will NOT work"
-
which is fine. im saying something like that hasnt happened before
-
and if it CAN be clicked past, alot of users will click past it without reading it - happens alllllllll the time
-
i get that
-
user seeing this in FW hasnt happened before in my experience
-
maybe before my time!
-
ok guys i get things were upgraded, but the user experience with this one will be way different, thats my only point
-
This is a big protocol change just for the node runners sake, and once a node is caught up, new tx’s don’t come flying in too fast to handle imo.
The dispenser creation process could be modified instead of the buying process/tx and keep the buying process/tx the same and achieve the desired outcome of lightening the load of the node.
I’ll have to come back later to explain more/how if that was not clear enough. -
Anyone have a sense of the cp community outside of this chat? For instance, Casa Tookan is a CP wallet advertised on the SoG website. Never used it, but there might be some isolated communities that require outreach about this upgrade
-
The counterparty voluntary customer service department is the best in the industry.
-
Dispenser “functionality” can simply mean being able to send bitcoin. Which might be something users have been socialized to do. Same with Freewallet mobile.
-
which why CIP 21 was so interesting and brought alot of volume back to xcp assets during 2021-2022 (despite it being live long before then)
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/cips/blob/master/cip-0021.mdcips/cip-0021.md at master · CounterpartyXCP/cipsCounterparty Improvement Proposals. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/cips development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
Not doing an upgrade because we’re worried about people who are not using a CP wallet to buy from dispensers seems silly
-
No one is advocating not doing it
-
Please reread my comment.
-
Take freewallet mobile. From my understanding that wallet will never see an upgrade. Many users see that as a CP wallet and have successfully used it with dispensers for years
-
im for it.... just a small change can have large consequences if not handled right - especially with users (most of which dont follow these discussions) who are used to one way of doing it
-
last thing i want would be for people to say "XCP is broken, my dispense from FW Mobile didnt work and I lost 0.1 BTC this is a scam it always worked before".... Mobile would have to be updated too with that popup
-
when in reality it is a very good upgrade that fixed things
-
So you would have to be using a non counterparty wallet and not be paying attention to any announcements or chats
-
Xchain (and other explorers) as well. That’s what the user is encountering and where the messaging would need to be
-
Seems like a very low percentage
-
this too
-
Freewallet desktop+mobile are CP wallets. Not sure what the plans are
-
in my opinion its not low - and even if it was 5% - when there are 500 dispenses in a day thats 25 possible lost btc txs
-
dispensers are basically all the artists and users have (other than emblem) - almost nobody is buying through xcp and pepecash on the DEx these days
-
most FW users are on mobile
-
in my opinion
-
i try to steer them away from it, but most people use Fw on their phone an i cant stop em
-
its MOST likely because its on the app store
-
and theres super scary messages for downloading desktop version
-
No idea what the usage stats are. But seems like it would be the natural choice of someone running the desktop client.
Btw: don’t just assume the desktop client will be upgraded either -
That doesn’t mean they were good.
-
im simply trying to think of possible bad situations for the dumb user who doesnt read anything and doesnt keep up to make sure they dont lose funds, i could have easily been that person in another universe and anything that can go wrong, will go wrong
-
I think we just want to prevent that and having a discussion to understand all the edge cases is good. No one is advocating not to proceed (at least I’m not)
-
this might take a while.
-
any wallet on the Counterparty wallets page needs ample time to upgrade and if they dont, take em off the website as recommended wallets is my 2 sats
-
ask those devs... i wouldnt know the answer to that
-
Musk would push the upgrade next week and say fuckem
-
I think it’s pretty obvious there is one explorer and one wallet that handles most of the dispenser activity and it’s really about convincing that one particular dev.
-
Making the transaction larger (including cp data) also bloats the block and increases tx fees, only so that xcp node operators can compute a certain way. Not the best situation for the blockchain or users. Not a very fiducial implementation.
-
true.
-
Be good stewards
-
Monya too... I know that is still used in the Japanese communities
-
Is that MonaCoin? That also raises an interesting point: will forks like DogeParty upgrade? Not really our concern… just curious
-
You don’t need to convince us
-
We’re just chattering… this is really about the actual devs and what they decide to do
-
If a user doesn’t use a CP wallet and doesn’t read anything, it doesn’t matter how long this upgrade is delayed, they will lose their funds
-
oh, and implementing this change would also fix *this* way that users can currently lose their funds with dispensers
-
The hard close. We know what mandatory means.
-
Will post on the proposal, but this was needed 👍. "Just sending some bitcoin" is great but result in a lot of failures, like using a non-compatible wallet, or sending BTC to your own wallet and triggering a dispenser by error
-
We should only trigger a dispenser when we want to trigger one.
-
Finally we stopping accidentally filling Coinbase's PEPECASH bag? -
-
I sent some MISSPEPEPUNK to dextrade like this --
-
I feel like huge things are in the making right now
-
My fakerare are more fake and rare thanks to this 🥲
-
This is a great point
-
I imagine that with this prefix, we could also think about a better version were you can have multiple dispensers on 1 address? (and choose which dispenser to trigger)
-
current way of having 10 addresses for 10 dispensers is ... bad
-
This would improve the use of dispensers by 1000% 🔥
-
The ONLY way? How about introducing this as a new feature and giving it a different name, like ‘Vend’ without deprecating the dispenser functionality.
-
Multiple vends
-
Please don’t gaslight
-
I really question the values and principals in this group.
-
It would only be mandatory to use the new feature, so not mandatory. But whatever, no skin off my back.
-
You should leave you offer nothing
-
Bitcoin is the network
-
Boomers having a hard time 🤣
-
Wow. You guys are loosing it.
-
Don’t feed the trolls
