- 01 June 2019 (10 messages)
-
Shitposting not only on XCP sadly - 02 June 2019 (21 messages)
-
Bittrex's XCP address has 113,611 spends, and they charge 0.2 XCP for a withdrawal. They're paying $4+ BTC right now to send people their XCP. -
1AeqgtHedfA2yVXH6GiKLS2JGkfWfgyTC6
-
552,228 XCP still on their wallet
-
-
Japan is going to rally around Counterparty
-
Dex
-
I don’t know if this makes sense, but what if we burned xcp to create btc tokens on erc20. Since xcp was directly created from BTC, we extract the BTC value by burning xcp and transferring it to a ERC20 token. It would also lower the supply of xcp. -
"a standard"... that no one uses... sounds pretty "standard to me 😂 -
Not Ethereum please 😒
-
To raise the price. Extract value. Obviously the low price hurts development and bounties.
-
And is the idea really a scheme? Makes sense to me.
-
The values in the usage and the price will go up when it's easier to use -
Is there a way to reject incoming transactions coming into a btc wallet?
- 03 June 2019 (118 messages)
-
First question you should be asking yourself, why would anyone want to buy TROPTIONS? -
Hi..where is xcp dex? In counterwallet?...im using freewallet and it seems the exchange is not ready.. -
Very good admin go somewhere else, don’t need your attitude here
-
Curious how many wallets have never been active since the burn and receiving xcp
-
I say stop burning xcp on asset creation for x number of years and send it to a foundation fund for development - we need development and it’s not fair this whole project rests on a few community members - everyone wants development and our developers can’t be expected to work for free
-
Are there any bounties out there that can be funded that would help the dex usability? What is the hold up on making it more user friendly? -
I think you are starting to realize that xcp does not represent the organization success but how to use the system created. it's a service.
-
I don’t understand what you mean by that.
-
unlock the DEx on freewallet would give everyone access in that software
-
not just those with FREEACCESS or XCHAINPEPE
-
someone made it a BITCORN funding thingy but i think i'm the only one that donated... 😕
-
where is that link to the bounty?
-
-
look sliek 4 people pledged actually
-
it should show it to you in freewallet if you don't have the access token
-
sumilar to how the betting bounty is displayed
-
-
Donate to jdog, I’ll donate 100xcp, if others match me?
-
Just sent 100 jdogs way
-
xcp is used to create assets. Jdog has already created quite a few
-
Who cares how many he has
-
xcp is not stock in the company (for lack of better metaphors)
ETH cannot compare to XCP because the nature of the to things are so dissimilar -
then why add 100 if no one cares?
-
he is not going to sell them
-
but he needs to pay bills
-
so what did we do here?
-
virtue sending?
-
case in point. if you really want to help Jdog, then buy his tokens from him. that is the structure he made. OR you can support any aspect of the work he is doing by financing certain bounties of his own
-
i am all about actually helping eachother
-
Which is what I just sent a 100 for, no?
-
Is that not supporting him and freewallet?
-
if you dont believe me, and want to waste his time, im sure will actually not help in the long run
-
what do you think of the latest topic on the message board?
-
Waste who’s time? I donate 100 to jdog and I’m waisting his time? That makes no sense.
-
Thank you for the donation. Please post your address and i'll send you a FULLACCESS token -
Thanks jdog 1EuFfnego8Pgb3P1VuUdh283tewQws8Qd1
-
You didn't reply quick... so I just sent the token back to the address that sent me the XCP donation.
-
-
sent one to your requested address now as well
-
-
Ha crap, ok awesome thanks
-
2 FULLACCESS, nice
-
-
slow clap
-
ok mission accomplished. now. reviewing your short time here you have proposed something that you clarified at the beginning lacked logic, then a few messages later insisted it had merit because you understood it, despite just claiming otherwise.
then you go on to tell an admin to go elsewhere because if his attitude all the while not keeping in mind poes law.
so we here we are, im attempting to have a conversation with you, but it seems to be difficult. in retrospect, the reason i engaged with you in communication today is that you may embody the misunderstanding that is affecting most of the people who invested in XCP. -
Wrong I was talking to Milkhail saying very good admin, answer my questions
-
XCP does not represent collective ownership but potential for personal claims/use.
The function of this service token is to make it more difficult to spam the network. We dont have a problem with spam when hardly anyone uses it! lol ALSO, to think as a heavy user. I do not want to have to pay upwards of $50 worth of token to make one single asset as was the case with XCP peak. I would much rather the affordable quarter dollar per asset created. Why would i want to pay more as a user? THIS is what the token is for. Not to reward investors. Unfortunately, there is a strong #paradox to deal with here, and understanding it is the first step -
Who is we? You mean you? I don’t misunderstand anything.
-
but you insist that you know the answers also. it is hard to navigate, yes
-
No xcp offers the world’s most secure protection, it shouldn’t cost a $0.25, that’s ridiculous
-
please ask in complete sentences.
-
re: we/you
-
bitcoin offers the protection with every transaction
-
im totally willing to hash this out with you, and hope not to offend you!
-
Hash what out? I don’t have a problem.
-
ok. ill be here
-
since you misunderstand nothing. i look forward to the further insight you wish to share with this community
-
Your telling me I misunderstand. How do you know I misunderstand.
-
the telling belongs to the listener is seems
-
^gonn write that one down
-
What have you done done for xcp? I haven’t done much at all, what have you done. Please tell me? Show me a blog post, show me something.
-
or, we could have a conversation?
-
Yea go.
-
not too into reverse accusations
-
so far my word count is 10x yours. so as soon as you address anything ive said. until then :D
-
:thumb:
-
Ha exactly ty
-
exactly what?
-
Done talking to you
-
thanks to your participation today, it is not evident that there is too much cognitive dissonance to deliver a cohesive message to outsiders
-
Outsider, prob been here 10x longer than you, you know nothing
-
About me
-
👂
-
🙇
-
may i see your creds, since you ask them of me?
-
I don’t have any creds
-
you are in three xcp rooms. good for you. no project rooms though, this conversation was not supposed to be personalized. i mean to work through issues that are affecting the platform. If you or anyone else wants to chat about things, let me know. lets do it, here or private message. until then ad hominem is getting tiresome.
-
We need funding for our developers, we need publicity to make to price rise so the developers have the incentive to perform cips.... that’s what I think
-
I’ll be happy to help with that, tell me what I should do
-
Review this thread and share your thoughts here so that others can review your thoughts and comment. https://counterpartytalk.org/t/counterparty-foundation-in-2019-new-updates/5446Counterparty foundation in 2019? New updates?
Greetings everyone! I’m Alan and I’ve loved using counterparty for years, as well as trading it on exchanges and using the dex, and multiple wallets. The recent delisting caught me off guard on poloniex and I was curious why this occured. I wasn’t actively involved in development or even talking with other counterpart users or devs (in the past) to use the dex or exchanges I didn’t need to. Anyway, I was like ok, other than just checking the monthly updates let me make a post on bitcointalk as ...
-
Nows perfect time to raise that funding with xcp because price so low. Then publicize to make price rise.
-
It sounds to me like it might be time to call for another CP foundation election period where people can announce their candidacy... then a few weeks later hold a vote for a few weeks.... based on what i've read from that thread, general consensus seems to be that we need a group of people working together to move CP forward, hence another election seems logical.
-
Yea I read all those jdog multiple times, lots of good ideas
-
👍
-
Please let’s make foundation ASAP, we need it so bad
-
i think OP may have sold his bags and moved on within a week. Time to start a new thread, perhaps. that one seems dead.
-
did we end up getting a news letter out this month?
-
The point of the post was to gauge interest in getting another CP Foundation election going and to get ideas from the community on how to best move CP forward... I think the post has served its purpose... seems pretty clear to me at least that we should have another CP election.... I'll try to get an announcement thrown together later this week or early next week.
-
Still being worked on.... should be out tomorrow I believe.
-
🙇
-
Dead? 😂 last comment 3 days ago, why would you start a new one. Over 50 great comments In that thread
-
3 days is currently the longest to get a response in that thread
-
i see that you like to use baseless accusations for the sake of argument.
-
kudos
-
thanks for simply informing us that it is "not dead" instead of actually bringing it to life
-
Who us? I’m talking to you
-
-
-
nice. suggestions then?
-
as you see this guy would like to be told what to do? so how about the positivity seekers offer a topic
-
is the idea of calling for a new election a good topic?
-
yall seem quick to dismiss the narrative based on tone, but not substance
-
walk the #paradox mentioned with me and seek your pleasure in clarification. 🙇❤
-
and please dont ban me bro
-
I'm happy that you're happy with your TROPTIONS -
No I prefer my brains unscrambled
- 04 June 2019 (84 messages)
-
Yes I agree -
XCP can be used to buy assets created with XCP too, so it’s not quite the paradox you’re stating. The system exists beyond USD.
XCP should never be pegged to a dollar amount, rather BTC. Assuming higher BTC-XCP volume on the DEx in the future, its price ratio could factor into the cost of asset creation instead of the flat 0.5 XCP.
For instance, the price could be set to 50,000 SATs (0.00050000 BTC), so times like now would cost somewhere around 5-10 XCP to create an asset, but during the pamp where the price hit 0.01 BTC/XCP, it would cost 0.05 XCP. -
ANY ASSET can be used to trade with. Advanced traders do not even use game currency or XCP and instead trade directly art for art. That is the metagame of collecting we are all playing on the protocol. if you stop to think about what i said you would see the duality of counter-interests
-
this conundrum is what is creating confusion. I am intending to battle the ignorance and not any certain individual. Anyone/Everyone is welcome to participate in the conversation on here or the messageboard... but i have reflected on it. I'm going to say it. Each on of the people above who said to "keep it positive" failed to weigh in recently with any substance. So, i welcome you to do so
-
to restate the #paradox in new words:
XCP is a tool to reduce spamming the network. Primarily it is used to create Named assets. As an artist, I want to get the quality canvas for as cheap as possible. It is counter-intuitive to think an artist desires to pay any more than needed for materials.
YET, many users seem to think that it represents a stake in the company or that it has some representation of the health of the network. Erroneously thinking the higher the trade value and the bigger the marketcap, the more successful the project is as a whole. Investors who are holding XCP for the sole purpose of selling it later at higher cost are not only using is wrong, but also are working against the purposeful users -
one xcp is one xcp.
one btc is one btc. -
xcp is not btc
but
eth is eth is eth -
let us observe Ravencoin user satisfaction with having to mine gas that pays to register assets. that is the way they went, right?
-
Ethereum and Ravencoin created new chains rather than pegging onto an existing one. XCP is married to BTC, and BTC is the gas of the network. I think XCP’s model is better in the long run, but it certainly has its issues such as low exchange volume due to the lack of inflation from mining or BTC’s miner fees driving costs up.
-
I’m proposing a floating burn rate for asset creation, which would ultimately fix the price more so than the flat 0.5 XCP amount.
-
peg the value to BTC and then there is no purpose to use XCP.
there is nothing wrong with the existing supply of XCP and it is more than fair that the market decides the value outside of the system. -
im not sure why you are continuing to use shallow interpretations to converse with me. I do not appreciate that you assume that I have such a basic lack of understanding, repeatedly. Perhaps you are speaking to the audience? I do not care for this illogical reprocessing, I've seen it before. it has no merit
-
As you've said, the point of the XCP is to create assets, and you complained about the fluctating price. I'm shitballing an idea that could fix this problem. I stand by my idea.
-
I agree, but I just think it's way undervalued right now.
-
-
the most important thing everyone seems to keep forgetting
-
Once the public learns how to possess their BTC, everyone would have an easy on ramp.
-
In some ways, I think XCP can make BTC more understandable.
-
People (in general) don't understand BTC.
-
-
Buddha spitting mad truth this morning
-
XCP is a tool to reduce spamming of the network - the higher the price, the lower the spam.
-
differentiating complaints from discussion is an integral skill for effective communication
-
Some may consider your art work spam. Some may not. But ultimately the market will decide.
-
BTC's transactional costs are preventing spam right now.
-
So far, almost 75,000 assets have been created, but I'm not sure how many named assets exactly. A little more than 5,000,000 can be created with the current supply (2.6m) and cost (0.5). Should that 5 million figure be reduced?
-
I agree. But the protocol matters. Anyone can go and create a copy of XCP. It’s the history of the network that gives it value over copiers. The history is valuable. To think XCP should always be cheap gives the network history no value.
-
XCP is truly excercising BTC's store of value.
-
i think it will also be interesting to see how it ends up being inpretented as an exercise in the bitcoin blockchain's usability as a 'universal' time stamping tool
-
storing hash's of documents in the description field (or other methods, joe mentioned at Rare AF2 that freeport stores the hashes in 'Broadcasts' rather then the description field as i have done)
-
*interpreted
-
Would a broadcast allow for more space? I remember reading you needed to use an alternative hashing method due to the memo's size constraints. Otherwise, it seems like posting the hash in the memo is a better method. It's more up front.
-
yes i beleive it does, i don't remember what Joe said he was using, he said in an answer to my question at his talk, but it wasn't md5
-
which is, unfortinetly, what i've used since it fits
-
he wasn't using SHA256 though
-
use tuxexchange.com
-
just need an email
-
unless your scamming 😉
-
or send your BTC to a counterwallet.io and post a trade on the DEx
-
-
-
Someone bought 10 XCP for 0.00149540 BTC 2 days ago
-
I did 😶 -
Cool 😎
-
-
It does
-
Did you just use the word "truck" as a pejorative?
-
-
Description field will fit SHA1, but that was badly broken a couple weeks ago. It was weakly broken a couple years ago, meaning that you could not produce any collision you want at all. Now you can, and it's affordable to do so. So yes, you need more room for one of the SHA2 or SHA3 algos. Either the description field gets bigger, or broadcasting is a solution I don't know what's the good answer. -
yeah we use md5 even though it's kinda broken
-
MD5 is way beyod broken. It's completely rekt.
-
Use SHA1 at least.
-
it still essentially does the job, considering finding a colision would likely be obviously not the intended card art
-
MD5 was rekt in the 1990s.
-
I would actually pay to see that fake
-
make description great again
-
-
-
Oh, well... I've got no truck with you then
-
Zero trucks given
-
-
-
So if I send an asset to my coinbase address, technically it’s there, coinbase just doesn’t allow me access to it
-
But the asset will appear on xchain for my coinbase address
-
It's there, but you've lost control of it. Coinbase has the private key, so I think you're screwed.
-
Unless Coinbase has changed a lot since I looked. Any current CB users out there?
-
No I didn’t do it. I’m just saying people could buy the assets/tokens with a coinbase wallet, it just won’t show on cb
-
And they can't send them from there to a Counterpary-aware wallet AFAIK.
-
Yes, technically Counterparty assets can live at any Bitcoin address... but as mightbemike has indicated, if you send your Counterparty assets to an address you don't hold the private key to, then the assets are not really your assets.
-
When Litecoin port? ;)
- 05 June 2019 (10 messages)
-
Well yea, but it’s still connected to my wallet. Just curious if we sent enough coins to coinbase user wallets, would that put more pressure on coinbase to show xcp tokens
-
I liked the callback feature because it allowed a solution for kyc compliance
-
callback feature only worked globally... to call back ALL tokens, not just selectively calling back tokens from specific addresses
-
CIP - Callback (buy back) for reusable assets
This is an updated re-post of my comment in the topic referenced below. Introduction It appears some assets (use cases) would benefit from the ability to be called back. Now we have subassets so on the one hand you can create disposable subassets, but in some cases it’d be better to have an asset (or subasset) that does what the name says it does, rather than have to look it up in a database or Web site. Use Case 1: Reusable Tokens Certain assets - if you want to reuse them - should be callabl...
-
Yea, I understand that, and while I’m sure it would be expensive to recall globally, it does allow for security providers to reassign securities to proper legal holders and give a huge reason not to hold that coin if your not legally allowed. You would lose all value instantly if recalled and redistributed.
-
My concerns are listed in the forum thread linked above.
-
If a hacker calls back all assets, the security provider could just use history prior to redistribute. I like the point in regards of the scammer singling one person out. I think that pushes me to global only. In regards to value being returned if called back, I think that would have to be left up to the courts, they would have a record of the call back and non redistribution
-
Bearer bonds are illegal. Every xcp token that wants to be a security can’t if I understand correctly
-
You know what’s amazing, you can buy a share of stock, say I don’t want it anymore and someone must get it. You can’t burn a share of stock. Someone always has to hold it.
- 06 June 2019 (29 messages)
-
CP does not officially support core 0.18.0 yet.... I have been running 0.17.1 without any issues for the past month or so... but I believe that 0.18.0 has some breaking changes which John is looking into before we can officially support 0.18.0
-
Zaif!
-
Hello guys, I want to know if I'm alone to have my xcp on poloniex and I just discovered that they charged 16xcp as exit fees... Anyone have know if it's a bugs or the insane but real fees? -
I will lost more than 55% of the total of my holding...
-
Seems excessive, but realistic :(
-
In comparison of the other fees... I don't understand
-
Wonder what they think they are going to do with all the leftover
-
...
-
If they take that much for every single user and the other exchanges closed what are they going to do with all the remainder? Oh well. Send there is nothing that can be done. They have changed up to thirty dollars worth of xcp per withdrawal before
-
There is an upgrade around the corner that will empower theDEX to exchange btc for any asset easier
-
I pointed out earlier that Bittrex is paying around $8 in BTC transaction fees to send people their XCP while only retaining 0.2 XCP. It seems like poloniex is factoring in that cost, using XCP’s last US exchange price of around $0.50. It does seem silly that they would retain so much XCP after delisting it though.
-
Yep... A shame
-
Which Dex can trade xcp??
-
Tux exchange and counterwallet. Io are both options
-
tux is heating up a bit
-
.4 BTC in 24 hour volume on xcp
-
up to .000145
-
-
Both counterwallet and coindaddy are down again
-
[6/6/2019 17:45:49.225] Got an error when trying to sync BTC balances: JSON-RPC Error: <p><b>Type:</b> Server error</p><p><b>Code:</b> -32000</p><p><b>Message:</b> Got back error from server: {'code': -32000, 'data': {'message': 'Cannot communicate with mainnet indexd server at http://indexd:8432/a/14G9X7j8v1bUqLY8DqD24A5sV78qfERG79/utxos.', 'args': ['Cannot communicate with mainnet indexd server at http://indexd:8432/a/14G9X7j8v1bUqLY8DqD24A5sV78qfERG79/utxos.'], 'type': 'IndexdRPCError'}, 'message': 'Server error'}</p>
-
fixed... indexd on both servers died... restarted the service on both servers.
-
-
-
🙇
-
sorry i mistook your intermittent connectivity for waining interest.
- 07 June 2019 (14 messages)
-
Where or which exchange can I buy some xcp right now? -
And what's the price of a xcp now?
-
-
.00008494 lowest ask
-
3 more sends!!!
-
Wrap a token around an address and have the protocol do X with the btc when it receives x external token. So x can only happen when it receives x token - the token is a public private key and the code of x token address is transparent. So whoever operates x token has the ability to be an Oracle, but doesn’t have the ability to steal funds
-
Congrats to xcp team, 1,000,000 sends
-
I see 1,000,021 sends
-
That might count unconfirmed...
-
-
-
nope... the count only shows confirmed transactions.
-
What are the two numbers in the Unconfirmed line? - 10,755 / 23
-
first number is unconfirmed bitcoin transactions... second number is unconfirmed Counterparty transactions
- 08 June 2019 (6 messages)
-
I’m guessing this is in relation to counter event. That is totally scammy. They spent the money to create the asset and send it to active addresses it seems. I imagine this isn’t terribly profitable if at all. That should help clean it up. Otherwise, I’m not sure what can be done.
-
As the developer of freewallet.io, I can assure you that the wallet does not support "announcements" nor does it redirect to any fake counterwallet page..... Perhaps your thinking of something else other than freewallet.io
-
We have seen scams like this in the past where a gift/reward is promised and users are taken to a fake counterwallet login page in an attempt to steal peoples 12-word passphrase, but none of it is through freewallet.io.
- 09 June 2019 (58 messages)
-
"...the more transactions in your address, the more likely the XCP/BTC you get!"
-
sure reads like a scam!
-
The scammers are using counterparty, freewallet is just your portal to see what your address holds
-
Anyone is able to send anyone anything on the network, so there’s nothing freewallet or any other service can do to prevent that.
-
it gets even better. i entered a blank wallet, and got this:
-
Success Please Wait Upto 24 Hours For Validaton Wallet.
Note:
* For security systems without cheating.
* Only for accounts that already have transactions.
* If you want to claim bonus +1,000 XCP you must have a minimum balance 1,000 XCP.
* If you want to claim bonus +0.63 BTC you must have a minimum balance 0.63 BTC.
* If not eligible, bonus cannot be found. -
buyer beware is relevant in the whole internet, crypto especially
-
It’s an open-source Peer 2 Peer system, that’s the disclaimer
-
perhaps you are confusing an explorer with a curation function
-
rarepepe or any other project acts as a curator, screening assets for approval. xchain simply shows anything on the network.
-
the scammers figured out how to use it. soon valiant users to follow
-
that is not the way adoption works
-
right. so let us get to the ponit. you are accusing the community of not notifying you that this may be a scam?
-
are you part of the community? if so, then the community did step up. what is the next plan? an official tweet questioning the asset?
-
im not trying to start shit. just wanna know what you think we should do, together
-
not making assumptions.
-
looking to clarify
-
correct me
-
perhaps report the site to google?
-
as phishing scam
-
lets fix this
-
yet here we are talking about it
-
I agree. I believe USD values should be removed from xchain and wallets
-
👂
-
in the next explorer, this is a great idea
-
People make a trade with themselves on the dex and suddenly they have $669,420,666
-
complaining fixes everything. if just more people complained there would be no problems left. is this a complaint? who knows
-
🚨SCAM ALERT🚨
-
Market Cap should show 1,000,000,000 XCP rather than the dollar amount. It seems like troptions has been scamming with this too.
-
So, it is an asset with a description that links to a website.....All that freewallet.io is doing is showing you the asset description.
-
Add a disclaimer for what? That someone might put in a website description that links to a website which might be used to scam people? Again, all the wallet is doing is showing the asset description.... and actually, the wallet doesn't do anything but show you some text... no way to click a link and visit the url, you have to manually type it in... this is not an issue in freewallet.io
-
-
That is what the asset looks like in freewallet... no link to the scam url... and if you click "more info" button, then you are taken to the blockchain explorer page for the asset... NOT to the scam website
-
TL;DR... this is not an issue with freewalet or something that needs to be addressed in freewallet... I built and included the "reputation system" into the wallet for this exact reason... if you think the asset/token is a scam, then click the "Feedback" button and leave a negative rating.
-
Last seen 10:08
-
If he actually had concerns he would have stuck around for the solution instead of just troll baiting and bailing
-
Crypto Exchange Bittrex to Block US Users From Trading in 32 Cryptos
Cryptocurrency exchange Bittrex announced that it will block United States-based users from trading in 32 cryptocurrencies.
- 10 June 2019 (43 messages)
-
When did XCP get delisted on trex? -
May 31st
-
-
Seems like binance will also block user fron US..
-
thanks for carefully choosing your words that prove my point
-
come here to learn, or to boss everyone around?
-
freewallet is not to blame for any phishing scam.
TFW the "solutions" are worse than the problem -
when i lost funds on eth2cash dot com it was not the fault of Ethereum Foundation. Especially not the problem of the wallet developers.
-
CBECPIST
-
Yeah, I was scratching my head at their “COEXIST” creation, but it’s cool to see counterparty on it. I snagged this pic from r/cryptocurrency yesterday, but the hat is several years old. Maybe some of you have seen it before, but I had not.
-
naw, i know how to read it and took it a step furthur
-
[ANN] Start of the Counterparty Foundation 2019 Election - Nomination Period (Jun 10th - July 1st)
Announcing the Start of the Counterparty Foundation 2019 Election - Nomination Period (June 10th - July 1st) The Counterparty Foundation is a group dedicated to advancing the Counterparty protocol and its products, educating the community on the Counterparty technology, driving global Counterparty awareness, and ensuring Counterparty remains a successful and growing platform. The Foundation is governed by five Community Directors. Today, we’re happy to announce the start of the Counterparty ...
-
In case I would like to nominate myself, the process is straightforward. However, in case that I would like to nominate another candidate how exactly the process works? Can I nominate another candidate by using my wallet (as a proof of holding more than 50XCP)? Should the candidate that I nominate hold also more than 50XCP? Should the candidate that I nominate be aware OR/AND agree that I propose him/her as a candidate? For example, can I just propose JDog or John as a candidate? -
Anyone can nominate a candidate. The candidate should be notified that they have been nominated. The candidate can then accept or reject the nomination. If accepting the nomination, they would then need to post some basic info on themselves, including the proof of owning at least 50 XCP.
-
👍
-
FYI, I can not serve on the foundation, as I am the CIP Custodian (holder of the general/dev funds), and it would be a conflict of interest for me to hold the funds, as well as have a vote on how the funds are spent.
-
Iam so happy!
-
All due respect, shouldn't a foundation control the funds? Creating another powerless foundation is surely going to fail again, no?
-
The foundation does control the funds. The funds are not spent without the foundation saying so first. Also, the foundation is free to elect another CIP custodian if they see fit. I was elected by the last foundation as the CIP Custodian per the CIP bounties guidelines laid out in https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/cips/blob/master/cip-0008.mdCounterpartyXCP/cips
Counterparty Improvement Proposals. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/cips development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
The funds, and all counterparty properties (counterparty.io, counterwallet.io, counterpartytalk.org) are under the control of the CP foundation... I am simply the one who was handed control of the CP properties by the foundation and Robby when he left.... If the foundation wants to change something, they have all the power to do so.
-
My letter to the Counterparty community (2017-06-08)
My letter to the Counterparty community (2017-06-08) - letter.md
-
Shouldn't you be on the foundation then? There seems to be a disconnect between the actual levers of power and the foundation. This was an issue last time, no?
-
Also... FYI... The foundation didnt fail because it was powerless... it failed because certain community members took to attacking the volunteer foundation and developer and the remaining foundation members decided it was no longer worth being attacked, so they closed up the foundation and assigned all the remaining funds to be used for CIP bounties
-
-
So the foundation has no actual control over the official websites or the development funds. How can this NOT lead to problems?
-
As I have said previously, the properties are owned by the CP foundation, I am just the one who has been running the sites (on my own dime, to the cost of about $250-500/mo).... If the CP foundation wants to appoint someone else to run the sites, I am happy to hand over all properties
-
Yep. If the foundation wants to appoint someone else as CIP custodian, and take control of the website properties and run them on their own, I will happily hand over control...... Up until now no one else has wanted to take on the responsability so I have been stuck with it... This is not a situation of me trying to maintain control over anything... Everything is owned by the community, represented by the CP foundation, and I am happy to hand over control of whatever they want.
-
Not sure why it would be an issue at this point as I have done nothing but help support CP and pay out funds to developers per the previous foundations request... but again... if the foundation wants to change things, they can.
-
None
- 11 June 2019 (19 messages)
-
-
No, we did not, or we would not be having an election now.
-
Bitcorn Foundation held elections then
-
Better luck next time kid. -
It is an unpaid position. Funds are for dev, marketing, and server hosting only
-
Sure, once a foundation is elected, they can vote to change the bylaws
-
Less than 2 btc... will dig up exact amount tomorrow
-
This helps Counterparty's brand https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/10/us/pepe-frog-infowars-alt-right.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&fbclid=IwAR0254g8M5ayE4m0nGKKXF6YVF5egG4uzjn0fQF3G5x6kPMKvslhiAGTCEkInfowars Agrees to Part Ways With Pepe the Frog
Matt Furie, the creator of Pepe, sued to stop its use by the far-right website. Infowars agreed on Monday, paying a $15,000 settlement.
-
Admin please unban @Worldchaplin
-
Unbanned. He was banned by Shawn Leary in the past... not sure why.
-
Thank you
-
-
Thank you dearly noble - 12 June 2019 (3 messages)
-
Welcome back mang
-
Counterparty
There's some exciting news from the #counterparty community this month including a new Counterparty foundation election, new CIPs, and a new counterparty side-chain project! https://t.co/qoa5XTfFZ6 #XCP #Counterparty #BTC @Indie_Square @mafiawars_io @FoldingCoin
-
Thank you family
- 13 June 2019 (79 messages)
-
CIP21 and Hazama
-
Sounds awesome!
-
Awesome
-
Hello, this is TRUCK
-
-
Skrrrrrrrr!
-
Wow
-
So Hazama pegs a price at entry and exit? All coins for a particular asset have same exit and entry price in btc? Is that correct?
-
They could if we work certain token project like member firms of the community this is something that we need to discuss as a whole community
-
I’m just confused on how it works... I send 5 Pepe’s to Hazama, the peg just means it holds 5 tokens in the xcp wallet, while 5 are are on the centralized chain?
-
5 Pepe’s
-
Just like polo or whatever basically, but in a community pool that can peg it out if we want to go back to the btc chain
-
Can you exchange with other tokens or no?
-
I send 1 rock, I trade 1 rock for 1 marble, I withdraw 1 marble
-
Fucking awesome, love it
-
Beautiful
-
anyone interested in setting up a new Official chat for Counterparty? i’m trying to cut down on the number of chats i’m in. i think if i leave the chat could be destroyed so if someone could host a new one that would be greatly appreciated. thanks
-
yes
-
@CounterpartyXCP still squatted?
-
yep never mind on that one
-
Shawn you not here? Anymore?
-
@Counterparty i’m still banned in
-
still the trump dojo
-
yep, trying to cut back, i have a telegram addiction, i need help
-
Lmao
-
my kids are seeing my buried in my phone too much
-
me
-
I’m very excited about Hazama, this brings xcp to a whole new level
-
I set up a chat off telegram because some users wish to remain anon and not get burner phone even
https://riot.im/app/#/room/#counterparty:matrix.org -
i had not announced it in any way yet though
-
doubt it will take off, but good to know about it.
-
yeah. but as for telegram, why not just keep this room and add admins?
-
allow jdog to add admins, based on the election would be the best answer, imho
-
Yes cause we need to clean out all these deleted accounts
-
I have a counterparty base chat on here for our token(s) projects
-
Or we have Dans chat
-
Hazama going to open a whole new world for xcp.
-
Do we have a donation fund for paying server costs?
-
No, when the foundation went away so did the general donation address. Any remaining funds were to be spent on funding CIPs. Once the foundation starts back up again, they can vote to setup another general donation address again and collect donations into a general fund, as well as collect donations to specific CIPs. All the server operating costs for the past year have been covered by me personally to the tune of $250-$500/mo.... I suspect once the foundation gets booted back up, one of the first topics should be how to cover its operating costs, as I can no longer continue to bear this cost myself.
-
Group creator transferring ownership
Hi. So I am an administrator for a very large supergroup. The current owner wants to hand it over to me. Is it possible for the current creator of...
-
admins making more admins is a setting
-
I just verified, I am able to add admins... I made Bench an admin and then removed his admin powers.
-
there are admins but as creator of channel not sure i can leave, but don’t want you to lose all the active peeps. many of those in this chat are from Twitter promotions that I did to get people in here a couple years back. not sure how many are real or still active
-
Just stick around shawn... lurk 🙂
-
hate to admit it, but i made a room with an account that got deleted to neglect. the room is still there
-
i can’t help but read the chats, part of my problem
-
-
sounds more like you need to get a sock for important stuff only
-
and go silent on the main one
-
yea also having my real name in a lot of chats probably isn’t smart
-
depends on your angle
-
best of luck to you getting it settled :D
-
This what one are concerns is thank you for this information... Got to do some community brainstorming as we go
-
That should be our biggest concern, good work ty
-
I dont mind hosting a new official chat for us if everyone is okay with it
-
I would prefer we keep this chat, we already have the community split between 2 "Counterparty" chats... no need to confuse things even further... plus this one is linked from the counterparty site/reddit/etc.
-
Ohhhhhh definitely get you Jay
-
-
i missed my time as admin
-
don't sweat it.. you had a glorious run as admin with no complaints from anyone 😛
- 14 June 2019 (186 messages)
-
Where do or should go now to buy xcp if its delisted almost everywhere now?
-
there is 15k in sell orders on tux
-
pamp it 😉
Official Counterparty Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 Jun 2019 (10)
- 02 Jun 2019 (21)
- 03 Jun 2019 (118)
- 04 Jun 2019 (84)
- 05 Jun 2019 (10)
- 06 Jun 2019 (29)
- 07 Jun 2019 (14)
- 08 Jun 2019 (6)
- 09 Jun 2019 (58)
- 10 Jun 2019 (43)
- 11 Jun 2019 (19)
- 12 Jun 2019 (3)
- 13 Jun 2019 (79)
- 14 Jun 2019 (186)
- 15 Jun 2019 (193)
- 16 Jun 2019 (60)
- 17 Jun 2019 (181)
- 18 Jun 2019 (43)
- 20 Jun 2019 (13)
- 21 Jun 2019 (44)
- 22 Jun 2019 (31)
- 26 Jun 2019 (82)
- 27 Jun 2019 (26)
- 28 Jun 2019 (206)
- 30 Jun 2019 (46)