- 02 May 2018 (20 messages)
-
hello
-
xcp airdrop coinmarketcal???
-
real?? fake???
-
Ask the airdroppers
-
Not the airdroppeds
-
@jpjan
-
please direct airdrop questions to this TGram account @jpjan, also join this chat @coinweb this is not the chat for discussing, thanks
-
did coinweb make an actual telegram group to shunt all the latest fork fomoers into?
-
-
OK I cornered @jpjan in @coinweb for more date details about his airdrop plans so we can clear up some confusion from noobs
-
just paste this ery time
-
-
Counterparty
Our May #Newsletter is up! There's some big updates from some of the most popular #Counterparty projects this month! https://t.co/0Yx80f2Zih … $XCP $BTC $BCY #Bitcoin #blockchain #gaming #cryptocurrency @FoldingCoin @BitCrystals @SpellsofGenesis @MandelDuck @SpacePirate_io
-
None
-
-
Nice update. Also @hesokuri & @pepevote should get some love
-
-
was this from the meetup yesterday
-
;)
-
- 03 May 2018 (23 messages)
-
Maybe call it Block Chain 2.0 Machine Learning Smart contract Finance Professionals meetup and see the turnout soar..
-
Free pizza and/or finger food and NETWORKING plus presentations and tokenize blockchain buzzwords and you're onto a winner.
-
Was short notice, get a date out sooner might be able to pamp it more
-
This is getting a bit rich. They reached the dontaion funding goal for all the CIPs months ago (a decent sum, 500xcp for segwit), said they’d have them coded months ago, and now still no release but waiting for ‘pledges’ from indiesquare and foldingcoin??? C’mon devs, get yo crap together.
-
Thanks for your perspective. I guess one way to address that is to try to quantify what proportion of effort went in from which contributors.
-
Cool, will do
-
I’ve already read most of it, nothing new
-
Thanks for the help and all the good work you put in though dude.
-
Serialized Tokens
There have been a few conversations in the past on slack about serialized tokens and how they could be accomplished. Unfortunately, all of that conversation history is lost. I think it is time to capture this idea in a forum post and get feedback from the community. The general idea is to be able to assign each token a unique ID which is tracked through the tokens lifecycle. Example Use Joe the artist creates a new piece of artwork called “DigitalCurrency”. Joe now wants to sell the ‘origina...
-
👍🏻
-
lol, thought you wanted him banned
-
i’ll fix
-
lol
-
thought you meant another scammer
-
word, ready to get out the chat game and hang up the hat for good b.
-
i can’t add him back @TitaniumP
-
if you can
-
-
sorry man, got a little excited
-
won't let me add
-
Well that was odd. Let me know if I'm doing anything wrong. Just trying to sort my project out using counterparty platform to create an equity token that is legal
-
nope u good. my apologies
-
Word
- 04 May 2018 (4 messages)
-
-
if anyone is in san francisco on 15th of may, there is a conference focused on blockchain gaming where we will present the Age of Chains project: http://www.pgconnects.com/sanfrancisco/blockchain-gamer-connects/
-
Bezant moon
-
- 05 May 2018 (45 messages)
-
Don´t miss the FoldingCoin Public Meeting tomorrow, Saturday at 14:00 UTC with the latest updates and news! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXbxN6Ho2qoPublic Meeting May 2018
Come join the FoldingCoin and Curecoin communities to discuss the recent news and updates relating to the project. The Meeting Recap Notes can be found at th...
-
idgi, admin me
-
hallo dev,this is really for airdrop?
-
I agree with three letter assets
-
-
+1 I also agree with the shorter asset name proposal. And a very valid point about exchanges having to do less legwork to support additional tokens once XCP proper is added. Just need that initial momentum. It's true many exchanges nowadays work on a payment first talk later model but also it's down to buzz. If there's community demand, exchanges will list and there's many to choose from.
-
Thanks for your patience while we prepare to bring you the latest #Foldingcoin news and updates! We will start in about 20 min. Sorry for the delay. The hangout will be at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXbxN6Ho2qoPublic Meeting May 2018
Come join the FoldingCoin and Curecoin communities to discuss the recent news and updates relating to the project. The Meeting Recap Notes can be found at th...
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
other than changing the registration fees for three letter names, are there any other changes? what are the arguments against two letter registrations if this continues? if three letter cost 10 xcp then mathematically it is fair for two letter to cost 1000 xcp?
for that matter should one letter cost 100,000 xcp?
just trying to follow the logic path on the cost to rarity ratio -
-
-
-
i m sorry. that is an insufficient answer for me to understand the perceived objective this accomplishes.
trade pairs on most exchanges is three letters and relevant "because theDEX"
^what is mimicking what?
what do these newly registered three letter tokens represent if not the same altchain named? How is this going to make xcp more appealing to be adopted by new users? -
@droplister how many devs are actively developing on xcp now?
-
Nice!
-
I’m going to try and make the June 5th meetup
-
Also thanks for the mini update!
-
can i run a federated node wtha n existing bitcoind?
-
so i have to run 2 bitcoin nodes if i already run one?
-
and can it be run with non-sudoers?
-
is there an xcp database that also gets large in addition to the btc blockchain?
-
i keep large database files on a separate drive and i have to edit the config prior to keep my ssd clean
-
my bad i did read that
-
thanks... the files themselves i just syslink
-
sym*
-
armory_utxsvr is that unique to my machine or is that soemthing that is decentralized and can be recreated
-
do counterblock, counterparty, armory_utxsvr need to be backed up?
-
-
50 Cent "A Psychic Told Me" - DJ Khaled Diss
http://TalkMoBucks.com | That Rap Money 50 Cent "A Psychic Told Me" - DJ Khaled Diss
-
i remember the days when you could tell how good the art was by the amount of needles lying on the ground
-
Btw @droplister I've been running the indexd branch without issues at least on my tests with Bitcoin 0.16
-
There's a config needed for 0.16 to make "legacy" address default if you're gonna use the cli tools
-
And regarding cip10, it does need cip6 or a better "long message" solution in place before rolling out
-
As it is, cip10 just has enough bytes to send 1 asset to two addresses
-
Excellent
-
I'm having irl trouble so haven't been able to plug away at code lately
-
Hello folks! Did anyone randomly receive a spells of Genesis card recently? A water court card? A friend of mine found one in his wallet recently that was sent on the 27th of April. This card was part of a promotion back in the day but we don't know why it was sent to him so recently?
-
Thank you!
-
I'll ask him about that
-
I did wonder if it had something to do with that, but they never mention reissuing Kingdom of Waters Court cards, and it's not part of the April leaderboard rewards (I'm the friend, hi !)
But given it's a Water card, it's not too much of a stretch. - 06 May 2018 (76 messages)
-
CIP Proposal - Three Letter Asset Names
We don’t need to worry about numeric collisions with 3 letter asset names (as long as they don’t start with A). The numeric collision issue was with adding assets that start with the letter A.
-
-
Such a presumptuous and pompous lil pepe. Thankfully commit access isn't something someone can buy.
-
@droplister’s LLL asset proposal offers zero improvement to the counterparty ecosystem and is 100% GREEDDRIVEN and DESTRUCTIVE.
-
Most of you in the space probably know what a “dropcatcher” is — a person that catches domain names as they expire and drop back into the pool of available domains.
-
A “droplister” on the other hand is someone that catches domain names and then immediately turns around and lists these assets for sale at a significant mark-up.
-
I have no problem with people playing by the rules of the game, even if this means flipping stuff for a quick profit. This sort of behavior simply substantiates what I already know to be true about Dan Anderson’s actual motives and his underlying character.
-
In my observations and first hand experiences with this guy, he is not to be trusted.
-
At best @droplister is a level one domainer, a real “squatter” that I suspect got into CP because of how easy it is to register assets and the process reminded him of the domain game. Now he’s learning how to write some php and thinking he’s gonna take over the counterparty project.
-
Dan Anderson is currently sitting on hundreds of counterparty assets. He has setup xcpdex.com to conduct private transactional data analysis and now he wants to be able to hoard and exploit the LLL namespace.
-
He openly admits that he isn’t concerned about the confusion and negative side-effects that 3 letter assets would introduce into the cryptosphere at large. This attitude is negligible and demonstrates perfectly why Dan Anderson does not have and should never have Counterparty commit access.
-
I guess there is a bit of concern creating a BTC asset on xcp. How would one differentiate between BTC and xcp asset called BTC? Is this a cause of concern and confusion?
-
Crypto Michaël
$BTC right now. https://t.co/f0EAeXSBEj
-
Your not alone in your concerns Magickian... Dan has openly said he doesn't really care that registering existing symbols would cause confusion. https://i.gyazo.com/6919b7fd3d790c9ff6a6e9533e24a7b2.png
-
Re: Commit Access.... there is a reason why commit access is only held by a few trusted community members :)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
dismissing valid criticism is a form of trolling as well
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Land rush by squatters
-
-
-
Why does text memo show numbers and not actual text info? I see some tx still have text memo and others have numbers and no alpa lettering.
-
-
-
-
What's the point of text memo field if no text shows?
-
-
-
-
I personally support the notion of LLL assets. I think the argument about it allowing deception has a point but deception is already possible, as pointed out. Anyone can register 'Troncoin' or 'Ripple' or anything, and I'd argue a noob is just as likely to get caught out purchasing 'RIPPLE' than 'accidentally' buying XRP on the dex. I don't really think it should be the role of counterparty to police or enforce. I don't really imagine a horde of people getting scammed with 3 letter assets suddenly and think the benefits outweigh the cons. With that being said, I think there are more important things to be focusing on initially, fee reduction mainly to put that pitfall that some use to disparage the project to bed
-
There was a point when counterparty was ahead of ethereum (at least in market cap) was there not? I don't know what on earth has happened with drama, an arguments and lack of funds but some small combined efforts should help bring counterparty back into relevance.
It's got way more potential than people give it credit. Rock steady, does what it's supposed to do, no lost funds unlike ethereum, limited supply, no BS with pow vs pos, or inflation for that matter, limited supply, launched fairly, an actual purpose to holding XCP (registering assets, dividends etc), first ever dex in thr crypto space, and a functioning ecosystem.
There's shitcoins out there that haven't even launched in mainnet with a mkt cap higher than spaceX, 10's thousands of users all talking about it, even though it doesn't even work.. I really don't understand it. I'm all for supporting anyone who's putting in any work trying to foster an economy, trying to raise awareness. Have no idea why this project seems too be plagued by beef and in drama -
-
luckily namecoin registrations expire if not updated. no one gives a crap enough to reclaim names at the moment because it is not popular. perhaps the downfall is ultimately because one person is calling most of the shots? the bottleneck of authority is tricky to tackle single-handedly
-
I'm all for donating to the fee reduction efforts and perhaps we can get a group together to actually do a bit of marketing. The newsletters are great, many othe projects 10x bigger don't put the effort for newsletters out there but the newsletter isn't getting new eyeballs. The market is pretty fickle
-
IIRC namecoin was 51% attacked and then majority controlled mining wise, a srcondary company essentially forked it and is launching their own ecosystem, with a $50 mill investment
-
If the primary argument against LLL is confusion with existing cryptos, doesnt blocking registration of top 100(by market cap) names take care of that? If the second valid argument against LLL is asset squatters then doesn’t increasing cost of registering LLL assets take care of that too?
-
What am I missing beyond those two arguments?
-
-
-
To help me understand, can you provide an example of what could go wrong?
-
what could go wrong is easy to see.
what could go right is harder to tease out, but only with critisisim and then concensus. I want the three letter idea to succeed, but with one major stipulation. ...this percieved prerequisite is going to be its own CIP proposal it seems.
I can only hope half as many people want to comment on it -
i want LLL, LL, and L
-
let’s do it! make single letter 100XCP fee :)
-
burn baby burn
-
-
-
serious, i think it should be changed once and make it a final move
-
remove all restrictions like that.
-
remove any char limit is more simple of a CIP than only introducing LLL IMHO
-
focus is eliminating any future CIPs IMHO. just do all of them, more land rush, more freedom. all good. the staggered approach makes me think there is something wrong with LLL vs LL vs L. I’m not a poison pill either, seriously would like to see all of these opened up. i think the approach suggested in the CIP is too conservative.
-
focused
-
never know. with LLL the only one you hurt is LLLL owners. with LL you open up another level and with L you really bust it open for some squatting. i think the rule in the first place, while well meaning, should be thrown out completely if changed.
-
so with each change you piss off another set who invest in the arbitrary line
-
just get rid of it all once and for all
-
like you said, open it up for a real land rush and get ppl excited about it
-
last i checked there are LLLL tickers and NASDAQ and also L on NYSE, so....
-
it all seems super wtf
-
well the only ones in favor of it are ones that want to open it all the way up.
-
so, choose what you want
-
i’m just a lowly TG chat room admin
-
like you say, fuck me for trying right
-
- 07 May 2018 (11 messages)
-
@ShawnLeary 👆🏻 several spammers
-
got em
-
Is he saving them for later?
-
everyone add an avatar or be banned
-
👆🏻
-
There’s another
-
for TAB?
-
May 22nd we are going to gather near bitcoin holy ground in Jacksonville
-
-
come on down
-
the burden of proof is on the claimant
- 08 May 2018 (27 messages)
-
I'll be there
-
okay. so i joined the other group.. and found out that this is the active one :)
-
which one?
-
When is the airdrop? Guys
-
who is sending you an airdrop?
-
-
I can see a triangle in the chart
-
does the triangle say when they are sending you an airdrop?
-
Yeah
-
there is the answer
-
Thank you
-
sorry M.G welcome back
-
👌
-
Counterparty_XCP
-
-
All coins not paying to get on. That's ridiculous if so. I see them add coins almost daily. Has anyone ever filled out the app to get listed? Or just hope exchanges list xcp?
-
I personally have filled out the binance request form for XCP a few months ago.... and I know a few others have as well... but no response and no listing.
-
it’s cheaper to get a real stock ticker :)
-
$400k
-
Gtfoheeeeerrrrrrreeeeeee. Really?
-
https://xchain.io/address/15ctNNSfo84dW5Ki8fTkcqbFAyfGbBXwsC
What's that account? Maybe they can do it! -
I thought i saw 150k when they first started out. 400k TF
-
yea that is ballpark circa 2014 when i looked into it
-
the cheapest way is to buy a defunct company
-
and their last thing they sell is their ticker
-
so you aren’t really picking the letters that you want
-
but you have an OTC ticker
- 09 May 2018 (77 messages)
-
can i use https://github.com/alexmat/bitcoin-addrindex instead of https://github.com/btcdrak/bitcoin/releasesalexmat/bitcoin-addrindex
bitcoin-addrindex - Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree with address index
-
Binance should list XCP without fee.
-
Will there be airdrop or not?
-
-
-
Re: airdrop
-
Hi, yes we are working on an official press release, stay tuned, going to be great 😉
-
I got this from Coinweb telegram group
-
Airdrop completed. https://twitter.com/mafiawars_io/status/994243084975304704Mafia Wars
1% of the MAFIACASH supply has now been airdropped to 360+ Counterparty community members in each of the 5 crime families. The fun begins on May 15th at https://t.co/S9L5v4UHO8 https://t.co/avriFAsWZL #MafiaWars #Bitcoin #Counterparty #RarePepe #Bitcorn #Blockchain #Gaming #XCP
-
Who’s project is this? It seems cool enough and everyone likes an airdrop but if nobody reputable speaks up it feels suspicious.
-
Also questionable on how the airdrop has been distributed. I’m trying to call anyone out, just requesting a bit more transparency.
-
Who are the 5 families?
-
Different projects in the space?
-
Idk, this feels different. Other airdrops preannounced
-
This guy just did it and then told people
-
My concern with the usual airdrop crap is that its used to pump the parent coin
-
This....isn't. That I can see.
-
-
-
Ttbomk?
-
-
-
Ah, an economic observation
-
-
Will be interesting to see how existing supply alters sale dynamics
-
The 5 families are BONANNO, COLOMBO, GAMBINO, GENOVESE, and LUCCHESE.
-
-
-
We airdropped 10% of each crime family token to the people listed on https://counterparty.io/donate/ as well as many other community members (over 360). Airdrops went to community members, RAREPEPEPRTY holders, BITCORN holders, and various telegram users who have been giving their addresses in telegram for weeks. The game is built on Counterparty so we felt it was best to start our game by giving something back to the community members which work on Counterparty and keep improving it. Each of the airdrops had to be planned out in order to ensure that the families were the same size (73 members) when the game starts. We hope this answers your questions about the Airdrops.
-
-
We understand that users are going to be skeptical of a new game from unknown developers and have taken that into consideration in our Game. First we have decided to airdrop the game tokens to Community members at not cost to them so that users can try the game out without having to buy anything. Second we are launching a working alpha version of the game on May 15th so that users can try the game out and decide if it is something they are interested in playing before the Token Sale on June 1st. We hope that these actions help us build a bit more trust with the Counterparty community.
Additional information will be revealed on May 15th when the game launches. -
Its relevant here for now
-
Except Bonanno family nothing else airdropped to me
-
And this room desperately needs activity
-
You're doing a great job so far. I was skeptical initially, but every step I've seen you take since then has clearly been thought through
-
Im cautiously optimistic
-
-
-
-
Its being built atm, from what I can tell
-
Im fine waiting for more details, there's been no ask for funding yet
-
He (or she) clearly doesn't want to let the cat out of the bag yet
-
ok, but outside of the game being on counterparty, there should be a way for prospective users to strategize in terms that are not directly related to xcp. the conversation could have been guided instead of snuffed.
the user is not helping the project by leaving the community spread across all the telegram chats, imho -
-
I assume it will happen once theres a product
-
t.me/mafiawars_ioMafia Wars
Mafia Wars is a Mafia themed idle game powered by the Bitcoin blockchain. https://www.mafiawars.io https://twitter.com/mafiawars_io https://instagram.com/mafiawars_io
-
-
Cool project. Might not have been paying a lot of attention because I missed it. Looking into it now.
-
Gotta try and get adopted into a fam.
-
why are you guys trying to remain anonymous?
-
We value our privacy. The game is going to push the envelope and we are not interested in any unnecessary exposure. Remaining anonymous is not an indicator of bad intentions. Satoshi Nakamoto is a great example of this. We hope that when the game launches and you are able to verify that it is not vaporware, that you will be a bit less skeptical. 👍
-
I don't know any bigger privacy advocate than me, it's not inherently bad, but I wonder why in this case. Privacy is not binary - all or nothing.
-
You want people to invest time and money in your game, it seems reasonable to develop trust based on disclosure of the basics. Some of the game mechanics may be your secret sauce, but will the game dissappear after a week? Who knows, with devs going to great lengths to hide their identities.
-
I mean, they aren't asking for money until a working product can be tested. In this space, that puts them in the top 10% at least
-
At some point, the work put in (if it comes to fruition) will tell us if they plan to stick around or not
-
-
And how will you determine motivation or figure out what the intent is? There are valid reasons for not publishing the code; i.e. to protect the algos to avoid players gaming the system. So if code is not open sourced, it seems reasonable to assert that trust is warranted based on the involved people being open about their involvement.
-
and as needmoney90 suggests, there will be time for everything. releasing any barebones version some time after launch is acceptable as well. but... sadly this is why the contracts on eth surpass xcp at this time. yet. with xcp, none of the families are gonna get the JUST end of the stick// i applaud the use of xcp, and am at the edge of my seat for the next week
-
Me too, game looks great, and I loved the old Facebook version back in the day. But something's fishy with the devs. Maybe I'll be sleeping with the fishes eh?
-
when you realize you got airdropped
-
-
-
Gambino here.... sorry helene.. we can't be friends anymore :P
-
Bonanno are supreme fam
-
straight from Sicily
-
Lots of spammers doing their thing here
-
-
-
that goes double for you
-
-
quick question: did you send Devon Weller a 1099?
-
-
yeah, you're right... tell it to the judge
-
Waddup
-
The Top Bits Of Mouldy Kale
-
-
"i put my pieces in the toaster and eat them anyway"
- 10 May 2018 (10 messages)
-
I am Colombo
-
same here
-
-
-
-
I was sent both GAMBINO and BONANNO to same address
-
makes me feel like a rat to be part of two families
-
-
no
-
- 11 May 2018 (8 messages)
-
i’ve heard this happen to others. sad
-
Any more info on this conference? I think I'm gonna drive down
-
Does anybody know anything about Vanilla XCP? Is it safe, reliable?
-
yeah, it was made by jp janssen
-
long time xcp supporter and dev
-
So it's considered safe to build upon?
-
yup
-
Ace. Thanks John. ❤
- 13 May 2018 (26 messages)
-
is this coin still alive fundamentally
-
I see good things
-
we see good things too
-
Counterparty is fully functional and used by multiple projects already. The majority of this space doesn't even have a working product.
-
that's what I thought
-
How anyone could call xcp dead in the face of all the vaporware in crypto being hyped, I don't know
-
EWT parabolic incoming
-
there's low interest due to lack of speculative value
-
It works, what more do you want?
-
does it have it's own blockchain
-
-
No. Xcp is a layer on top of BTC
-
nice, so it will never have any value, the coin itself due to velocity
-
correct?
-
Does away with unnecessary cruft and builds on a proven secure platform
-
No clue, I'm here because it works
-
The price will do its thing
-
Xcp works fine
-
Its possible that the price spikes up as much as it stagnates (due to no new minting)
-
But that's all speculation
-
I'm here for the platform/usability
-
💜💚❤💛
-
reminds me of Ethereum
-
-
-
It has its own value. See here: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/counterparty/Counterparty price today, XCP to USD live price, marketcap and chart | CoinMarketCap
The live Counterparty price today is $9.25 USD with a 24-hour trading volume of $74.94 USD. We update our XCP to USD price in real-time.
- 14 May 2018 (64 messages)
-
Where are the admins for this group? 😬
-
I'm one
-
The other group I'm not, which is why its overrun by spammers
-
Removing me as a mod was a horrible decision by trevor
-
What's up?
-
I’m not in the other group since Trevor banned me with no legit reason 😆
-
He banned me when I told him to add pimpslapper and bitchslapper to help automate spam removal, and then called him out publicly after a week of not responding
-
The previous several posts are all spam
-
Got another mod to unban
-
Caching issue on your end
-
They're all removed
-
Ahhh
-
Try restarting telegram, it's a known bug
-
Sucks, but I can't do any more from here
-
will do
-
Just so you can see the entries in the log
-
-
Just restarted. Do you see that post on your end?
-
Nope, that's the modlog
-
Everything there no longer is in the public chat
-
If you're seeing one of those, it's a telegram bug
-
I guess restoring is not dumping my cache
-
Settings
-
Data and storage
-
Will try that
-
Clear cache
-
Oh damn my tg cache is 5.5gb
-
Wtf
-
Hahaha
-
-
Could someone please list @Counterparty_XCP to @listmebot and please make sure all the information is accurate thank you!
-
I now understand why you arent doing it for the rooms individually.
-
they have 10,000x moar funding. and they kill babies too
-
-
i mean the platform. eth is a massive echo chamber filled with a lot of dumb money
-
👍
-
-
-
-
i've been told cryptokitties is privately owned and generating $10M a month in revenues
-
i call BS on this one
-
but maybe that's because they are self buying kitties
-
-
kitty wash trading
-
made a shit ton the first 2 weeks, tapered off, but now printing money again with celeb kitties
-
Honestly one difference that is blindingly obvious is they lack the constant infighting, politics of insulting, and nonstop bickering that seems to paralyze this community. Moar coding, less toxic behavior makes an inferior platform outperform.
-
-
A bunch of punks on an unsustainable platform punching above their weight class versus a working technology with unrealized potential that continues to underwhelm. Is it a cultural problem? Am I getting the story completely wrong? What do you guys think is going on here?
-
Maybe it's some communication problem, maybe it's that most of us using the tech could care less about price and more about core aspects
-
For one, Counterparty just works
-
Is xcp airdrop 31 may legit or just another xcpc scam to harm xcp image?
-
-
-
you didn't even spell it right "supreme"
-
the quality of spammers has never been lower
-
They are the scum of the earth
-
hard to hire good spammers these days I guess - BCH has market cornered
-
They are very stupid people from shithole countries
-
aaaaaaaaaaand it's gone
-
these supreme investment bots are on fire lately
-
must be getting sick returns to fund all those bots
-
We should all join that group and totally fuck with them
-
I got rich buying and selling CORNDOGS
-
whoa thats a risky market you should stick to annual rotational farming Bitcorns
- 15 May 2018 (21 messages)
-
Mafia Wars Alpha Game Site Launched - https://twitter.com/mafiawars_io/status/996244415978012672Mafia Wars
The Mafia Wars Alpha game site is now live and the Token Sale will be launching on June 1st on the Counterparty Decentralized Exchange (DEX). https://t.co/avriFAsWZL #MafiaWars #Bitcoin #BTC #Counterparty #XCP #RarePepe #Bitcorn #Blockchain #Gaming #BlockchainGaming
-
-
-
HESOKURI booty airdropping if you have an XCP wallet and haven't checked it out
-
What is hesokuri and how does someone get some of the airdrop.
-
Friggin christmas around here with all the airdrops 😀👍🏻
-
Merkle Monk
@MartyBent @CounterpartyXCP @TFTC21 @wasthatawolf If you like payment channels found in @lightning, @CounterpartyXCP is one of the first with Rare Pepe Payment Channels. @desantis mentioned them in @WorldCryptoNet https://t.co/SK5w3Z8X5f
-
-
Not yet. Need a dev to do the segwit work. I believe Chris Moss is going to start tackling this later this month.
-
how can one post a XCP asset order on dex and have it be up for the maximum amount of time? I find myself needing to repost orders each week while using counterwallet.
-
Freewallet DEX interface allows you to set # of blocks to expire up to max of 8064.
-
-
is this feature only for holders of of FULLACCESS and XCHAINPEPE? I'm not (yet) a freewallet guy.
-
yes. the DEX interface is only available to ppl who have an XCHAINPEPE or FULLACCESS token
-
Once the DEX & Betting development bounties are fully funded, then I'll happily open-source the wallet for everyone to copy/use.... but until that time, gotta keep the good stuff behind a paywall in order to ensure I get paid for my development work :)
-
56 days? 🤔 honest question: is there any technical reason why I can't post a 1 year long ask and save myself 11 months of fees?
-
The protocol limit is 8064 blocks. To post orders for longer than 8064 blocks would require a change to the counterparty protocol.
-
Technically, its just changing a number... I would suggest creating a post on counterpartytalk.org about it and see what others in the community think about the idea of raising the limit and to what... and then if enough people like the idea perhaps create a Counterparty Improvement Proposal (CIP)..... I too would like to be able to post orders for longer than 2 months :)
-
Same here 👆
-
Even indefinitely
-
Awesome! Given that btc fee volatility in 2017 ranged from ~$0.10 to ~$50.00 it would be super nice to allow $50 fee orders to last a few months if we get that bad again :)
- 16 May 2018 (12 messages)
-
any counterparty aware mobile wallets beside indie? looking for one that can sign a message .....
-
Freewallet.io
-
thanks
-
-
-
-
I missed this news: https://www.coindesk.com/blockchain-startup-coinprism-to-shut-down-in-2-days/'Colored Coins' Startup Coinprism Is Shutting Down
Coinprism was arguably ahead of its time, but much has changed on the tech and regulatory fronts since its debut in 2014, and the startup is closing.
-
‘Cargo-Cult Engineering’: Bitcoin Core Dev Slams Consensus Conference
http://bitcoinist.com/cargo-cult-engineering-bitcoin-core-dev-corgan-criticizes-consensus-conference/‘Cargo-Cult Engineering’: Bitcoin Core Dev Slams Consensus ConferenceBitcoin Core developer Johnathan Corgan has joined Jimmy Song in criticizing the seeming lack of Bitcoin focus at this week’s Consensus 2018 conference.
-
-
-
what the project liquid?
-
google for liquid crypto
- 17 May 2018 (14 messages)
-
-
-
I issued a token with a quantity of zero on counterwallet. Can I create more tokens later on?
-
Yes. You can issue additional supply as long as the supply is not locked
-
-
-
Because the supply is zero, the token isn't appearing in my counterwallet "my balances" area. Where do I go to issue additional tokens?
-
in counterwallet you click the dropdown arrow next to the token I believe
-
you also might want to check out freewallet.io .... freewallet desktop is pretty easy to use :)
-
The token doesn't appear. I created another token with supply 100 that showed up, but the zero supply token is invisible
-
I will check it out. Thanks
-
POWH
-
Freewallet.io is very nice-
-
Thx :)
- 18 May 2018 (3 messages)
-
What up people
-
Just enjoying my friday afternoon. How bout you john?
-
Hello
- 19 May 2018 (21 messages)
-
Hi, How can i Mine Counterparty
-
It is unmineable, all coins were created via an initial burn offering years ago
-
thanks
-
is there a proper way to shutdown counterparty server when not using a federated node? i am trying to run the server with a systemd and it hangs on "Connecting to database" if i try to restart to server. this is after i install the bootstrap database and the server accepts incoming connections
-
separate question: if I start bitcoind with "--reindex" using bitcoind .13.x is it supposed to take multiple days to perform
-
I think there is a counterparty meetup real close to you in a couple days or so
-
I didn’t check the calendar but that’s just my recollection
-
Hello
-
hello there
-
Hey youu
-
Can public my web here?
-
Is a counterparty projet
-
@FloridaBitcoiner yeah june 5th
-
i think
-
sure
-
as long as it’s counterparty
-
i'm looking forward to CounterCon
-
Prolly best to check counterpartytalk.org or join slack.counterparty.io
-
Yes, reparse can take days
-
Slack is whack if you’re a teen
-
Thanks for following up wit me here and on github as well. I’ve been trying to get the server up and running but it keeps having errors issues. I’ll check out the forum
- 20 May 2018 (7 messages)
-
hiya! I have a question regarding how buy/sell orders on DEX works. Let's assume that there is an asset listed on DEX with no buy or sell orders. I want to get 2 amount(s) of that asset, hence I place a buy order for 1XCP each, waiting for someone to fill it (amount 2, 1XCP each, total 2XCP). Afterwards, someone else places another buy order for the same price (1XCP) to get 4 assets (amount 4,1xcp each, total 4xcp), and finally, there is another buy order for the same price to get 5 assets (amount 5, 1xcp each, total 5xcp). Now there is a total buy order on dex for the specific item (amount 10, total 10xcp). Someone, go through an places a sell order (in order to fulfil those buy orders) but only for 5 assets (amount 5, 1xcp each, total 5xcp). My question is, which of those buy orders will get eventually fulfilled? Those that placed the earliest (i.e. 2 assets of my order, and 3 out of 4 from the second order)? those with higher volume (i.e. the latest submission with 5 assets)? is it random?
-
FIFO queue
-
First in first out
-
👌
-
The first person to place their order at a given price is filled first
-
thanks
-
Yup
- 21 May 2018 (4 messages)
-
-
-
Hola Homies, I hope that everyone is having a solid day. Live on and live well
-
- 22 May 2018 (27 messages)
-
Any updates on the god damn cip???
-
Last time cip 15 segwit was updated was 29 Sept 2017 😮
-
We need devs to do the work. We have a fully funded bounty for months but no devs to do the work cuz they are busy on other projects. Stomping and screaming about dates doesnt solve the dev dilema. Certain community members decided it was best for them to attack the cp devs for doing dev work. So it should come as no suprise that the devs didnt want to continue being attacked on a volunteer project so they left. So the foundation went away and devs moved on to projects where they are not attacked. Yes it sucks dev is slow, but there are reasons CP dev is slow. It is unfortunate that a few bad apples can screw things up so bad but this is where we are at. I know that there is going to be some more CP dev resources joining CP soon. Been a slow few months thanks to those bad actors..... but there are those of us who bleed for CP and love it too much to let it die a slow death and have been working to make things happen and get dev moving again.... TL;DR soon
-
this
-
so much
-
it is especially to progress difficult when actors from any angle are unable to separate the personhood from the data. Community building should ideally happen in the open, but unfortunately, some users are too self-important to be able to see criticism for the valuable feedback that it is.
IMHO, It is also important to consider that everyone in an organization has the place or role that suits them best. It is with great hope that we can all move on together, and productively without rehashing drama about actors. IF we are all here for the betterment of the protocol, then we should be able to put our personal differences aside for the good of the tech for everyone... not just the squatters, but newcomers alike. -
🐍"We need devs to do the work. We have a fully funded bounty for months but no devs to do the work cuz they are busy on other projects. Stomping and screaming about dates doesnt solve the dev dilema. Certain community members decided it was best for them to attack the cp devs for doing dev work."🐍
👆🏻that is a lie
No devs were "attacked for doing dev work". There was a paid dev named Devon who spent the better part of a month together with JDog proposing moving their efforts over to Litecoin. Any asset holder on the main Counterparty on Bitcoin would have been at risk of some other party registering that asset on the new Litecoin build.
There was a real possibility of an active project like say Scotcoin to now have some other party owning Scotcoin on Litecoin and creating havoc for that project.
🐍"So it should come as no surprise that the devs didn't want to continue being attacked on a volunteer project so they left. So the foundation went away and devs moved on to projects where they are not attacked."🐍
👆🏻more lies from jdog
There were two devs on the real fake Foundation, neither of whom were ever even criticized let alone attacked. The only other dev (Devon) was being paid $9,000 USD value (paid in XCP) per month for *part-time* work and he was hitting a stone wall regarding Segwit. He spent a ridiculous amount of time in that last month making Google docs to illustrate plans to do a shitty fork to Litecoin that Jdog fully supported.
When I realized that the "Emperor (Foundation) had no Clothes" and that the corporation was defunct as of early 2016 and had been rejected as a
501(c)(6) although that was never disclosed.
see: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/Documentation/blob/master/Bylaws/Counterparty_Foundation_Bylaws.md
I simply declared "I have no connection with that “foundation”."
see: https://counterpartytalk.org/t/whole-lotta-larpn-goin-on/4293
When it was clear that I had no part in it what reason did the main Dev, who was getting paid handsomely, have to jump ship and immediately declare that he was working on a competitive 'fork' over to Bcash? Sounds like he did what he felt benefitted him.
Within days, the remaining people met and that rather than get the house in order and hire legal council, as I had recommended in a meeting, they decided instead to declare that they were 'shutting down the Foundation'.
All the "Foundation" funds (about $250k at the time) was held by Jdog and seems like it may as well be at the bottom of the ocean.
🐍"Yes it sucks dev is slow, but there are reasons CP dev is slow. It is u fortunate that a few bad apples can screw things up so bad but this is > > where we are at."🐍
👆🏻here is an example of an apple that is rotten to the core trying to point to another apple in a classic case of psychological projection.
🐍"I know that there is going to be some more CP dev resources joining CP soon."🐍
👆🏻while certain devs and contributors are rejected and ignored on a regular basis
🐍"Been a slow few months thanks to those bad actors....."🐍
👆🏻 more projection
🐍"but there are those of us who bleed for CP and love it too much to let it die a slow death and have been working in the background to make things happen and get dev moving again.... TL;DR soon"🐍
👆🏻read this sign-off as: 'I'm a victim and a good soldier'
This is coming from the guy who holds all the donated money, and has taken control of *all* the web properties including the main counterparty.io website and domain. I cannot count the number of times that he has intimated that if XYZ happens that he would pick-up-his-toys-and-leave Counterparty.
Now this guy wants to try to rewrite history.CounterpartyXCP/DocumentationOfficial Documentation of the Counterparty Project - CounterpartyXCP/Documentation
-
We need devs to do the work. We have a fully funded bounty for months but no devs to do the work cuz they are busy on other projects. Stomping and screaming about dates doesnt solve the dev dilema. Certain community members decided it was best for them to attack the cp devs for doing dev work. So it should come as no suprise that the devs didnt want to continue being attacked on a volunteer project so they left. So the foundation went away and devs moved on to projects where they are not attacked. Yes it sucks dev is slow, but there are reasons CP dev is slow. It is unfortunate that a few bad apples can screw things up so bad but this is where we are at. I know that there is going to be some more CP dev resources joining CP soon. Been a slow few months thanks to those bad actors..... but there are those of us who bleed for CP and love it too much to let it die a slow death and have been working to make things happen and get dev moving again.... TL;DR soon
-
*eye roll* ok dante.... continue beating that Conspiracy drum. I have better things to do than waste time going in circles with you over imagined conspiracies.... Have a nice day Dante.
-
-
-
yet you continue with that pack of lies you posted - people want the truth
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
i'd love if we could all be operating from a point of professional excellence, it is up to each person to take it upon him or her self to gain the awareness of social etiquette be it IRL, in telegram or on the websites provided by and for the community.
Frankly i do my best to be a constructive participant in our coopertition matrix. IT is unfortunate to be demonized and summarily dismissed as an outsider when someone tries their best to help.
indeed the feels go all around, but the only way to move forward is to separate the person from the idea. DO NOT throw the baby away with the CIP. Part of the process is everyone agreeing. IF there is no consensus then a fork is incoming. This space has no room for pivotal actors with forked tongues
litecoin.fork, three character names, public access to subassets:
no matter the idea, if the majority of users do not support the motion, then MOVE ON
Come up with something else that is going to "save the project." -
-
-
I vote for doge
-
such vote, many agree!
-
Preach. Agree entirely
-
Here is a link to the Counterparty Dev Meeting from May 4th
https://archive.org/details/counterparty-developer-meeting-05-04-2018Counterparty Development Meeting 05-04-2018 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet ArchiveThis meeting took place on May 4th, 2018 at 1:00 UTC. Participants include (shown as usernames): arsen3d, dante, droplister, Jared, kingdavid, mandelduck,...
-
@parka90 SegWit is discussed around 11m45s
-
Depends