- 21 May 2024 (179 messages)
-
and i just dont like that. i was not supposed to be buying his xcp -
yes. luckily it was a fast block
-
what an idiot
-
you have to be dumb AF to involve mothers in to this conversation
-
i mean...
-
ill leave it here.
-
read coindaddy feedbacks
-
i know that addy for months...
-
just try to search that addy on TG
-
Yeah, I’m a total fucking idiot…. Though you’re using an idiots wallets so who’s the bigger idiot?
lol… haters gonna hate🤷🏻♂️ -
Fight stupidity with stupidity🤷🏻♂️😜
-
-
move you prick dont disturb me.
-
i will uninstall that shit when im home
-
Oh wait you’re referencing another shitty service written by an idiot developer…. The CoinDaddy reputation service…. You should probably totally not trust anything that says either….. since it is written by a complete idiot🤷🏻♂️😜
-
just to make sure you idiots will not rug me
-
because nobody read FW code ever
-
every update can be the last one
-
i left feedback myself, so yes i trust my feedbacks. it can be tattooed on your neck , i would still trust it if its mine
-
-
? What happened exactly? -
I still dont see how this happened tho -
That happens constantly. The list is updating. I've had that almost happen to me. But you have to double check.
If you've got that kinda money and didn't double check it's kinda your own fault -
try to use the FW for a month
-
and you will get in to the error
-
im sure
-
how can i double check lol? pop window told me im buying 115 xcp at a rate of 0.00154
-
i approved
-
because it was correct info
-
it havent showed addy im buying from
-
He uses FreeWallet refuses to understand how the fee calculation works, and then bitches because he use the wallet in a way that he expects it to work versus how it actually works.
Other people have already tried to explain to him that calculation happens after you enter all the information in about the transaction …
But he don’t wanna hear it…. Easier to scream and stomp your feet and shit rather than realize you’re not using the Wallet as it was designed.
And incredible how there’s thousands of users of the wallet, and they all managed to figure out the fee calculation without complaining much …. But their super smart user can’t figure out the basics?
TLDR… ID-10-T error -
im not newbie lol
-
im more tech savvy than all your team combined
-
He entered his manual fee calculation…. FreeWallet determine the correct fee to use…. He probably entered in his low fee again….. then complained when his low fee transaction doesn’t hit a dispenser immediately.
Blame the wallet himself 🤷🏻♂️ -
He starting to sound like fud raker
-
No, please don’t… YOU should uninstall it…. It’s much too complex for you to use…. I suggest you build your own wallet, since you clearly know how a wallet should operate😀👍🏻
-
at some point, you got a fight fire with fire….. I could calmly try to explain to this guy how the fee calculation is done at the end end of the transaction…. Which I did earlier…
But at the end of the day, haters going to hate , if he really wanted, he could use use rarepepewallet.com, rpw.wtf, xcp.ninja, or some other wallet. His only interest in here is to bitch and moan🤷🏻♂️ -
This him?
-
used it for years I see the tx fees change and always double check them. seems like you are in the wrong chat to complain as there is a fw specific chat where you could ask
-
-
This reminds me of the video where the Palestine and MAGA protestors are both cheering F JB -
Man do I love that video
-
-
everyone just angry these days lol
-
-
- 22 May 2024 (9 messages)
-
These guys are looking to use bitcoin to stake shitcoins lol
https://docs.babylonchain.io/assets/files/btc_staking_litepaper-32bfea0c243773f0bfac63e148387aef.pdf -
Gonna get Rekt?
-
Happy Pizza Day
https://xchain.io/tx/096aea38f7bba140f3542dfbdebf2bdc5bc9392cd5e67625b89162637884b883 -
-
Horrific idea. Yeeesh - 23 May 2024 (25 messages)
-
👀👀 -
OrdinalsLisbon | May 28, 2024 (@OrdinalsLisbon)
🚨NEW SPEAKER🚨 @agkrellenstein will be joining us on May 28th for our Ordinals takeover in Lisbon!
-
Who else is going to be in Lisbon next week?
Considering flying up there from Sydney on Sunday, if there’s a good Counterparty contingent to catch up with and hang out with. -
Cornholio, Tatiana Moroz, Mike In Space, Adam (shown above), I will be there. Who else? Hope to see you too! -
Wheres the link?
-
Does anyone need a developer? -
when is this
-
Thanks going to pass, not doing zoom, thanks though
-
no to zoom -
New card added to 17art collection
Blessedpepe
Total Supply: 37
https://xchain.io/tx/0d450a279e177760ce6b50d5c635f672a90f27beb8d56ac740b7c2a768fe9d1e - 24 May 2024 (16 messages)
-
very good!
I wish everyone has a marvellous time
I was almost booking my flights yesterday... my wife gave me her blessing to go, but I'm still getting over a bad virus and she's only just returned to Sydney after three months in Java.
First time we've been all together with all the children in one place since early February, so I have considered everything and I decided it is better to stay home, all things considered. -
Would it be possible to upload a video or audio from Adam’s talk? 🙏 -
WTS Wallet (with some dispensers still open). Maybe someone is interested, DM your best offer. Thank You.
Wallet address : https://xchain.io/address/12gfmgV5D2ZgRSujoQRNzKJtibyqsUfbAw -
Fascinating interview with JDog Rare Pepe OG artist, OG Dogeparty and Counterparty Dev
Fascinating discussion with JDog, Rare Pepe artist, OG Dogeparty and Counterparty dev, and creator of Xchain.io. In this interview, we discuss his early experience in crypto, including mining dogecoin on day1, finding dogeparty and counterparty, the creation of xchain and freewallet, becoming a developer for counterparty, his OG Rare Pepes and more. Follow Jdog on Twitter: https://x.com/jdogresorg Jdog's Pepe.wtf artist page: https://pepe.wtf/artists/JDog Check out Dankest: https://dankest.llc/ Follow ZeroG on Twitter: https://x.com/g0barry
-
Good place to buy xcp counterparty? -
Guess I'll look on coingecko
-
https://xchain.io/tx/a1ba19eeb7406f3fb989efbf956a9fbab26c3aee390cd8cd7a901b08b2c2717c
https://xchain.io/tx/dd9676a339ca951a240a9bedc15cebb32411dee8f2337e35ddcaccf8a02be0f6 -
There's a small exchange also, "dex-trade com" -
wen Adam and Evan interview -
come to think of it, wen Adam and Evan Fake Commons?
-
did Robby ever make art on a token?
-
That would be great. Please let us know if a video/recording of his speech is made public 🙏
-
*Danks - 25 May 2024 (18 messages)
-
Should've just bought my Danks -
Same -
I am curious what the process is now for a community member to suggest a change to counterparty, discuss it, move it to a solid proposal, get more community feedback on that proposal, and then move it to an actual improvement that gets implemented in code?
I am also curious why the CIPs repo was deleted entirely along with the forums, yet NOT restored when the forums were restored?
The Counterparty community had a process defined for the community to participate in discussions (The Counterparty Improvements Proposal) process, and it contained 9+ years of suggestions and improvements. Unfortunately, all those proposals have been deleted, links to those proposals are broken, and people are no longer able to lookup information in those propsals (for instance, CIP25 which defined the JSON spec for linking information like images/video/audio/html, etc to a token. This repo also contained detailed information on specs such as the length and characters used in subassets, etc.)
This is yet another thing which has been "accidentally" changed, renamed, deleted, removed, without discussions.
Current "CIPS" repo has been renamed to "Forum" and all CIPs are deleted
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/Forum
Counterparty Improvement Proposals archive :
https://github.com/jdogresorg/cips
I would like to suggest that the "Counterparty Improvement Proposals" process be restored, as that process was approved by the community and used for many years to suggest improvements, and I am not aware of ANY discussions with the community about removing or changing this process.GitHub - CounterpartyXCP/Forum: Counterparty Discussion ForumsCounterparty Discussion Forums. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/Forum development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
100% agree
-
every single CIP reference in my timeline is a 404... https://time.graphics/line/858561Counterparty Historic NFT Timeline - Timeline
All events are represented on the interactive timeline and can be visualized. You can review all the cause-and-effect relations of timeline
-
feelsbadman.... all that work to turn into broken links
-
sigh will have to link them again.... been needing to add more stuff to it anyway
-
where on the poll was an option to keep the CIP's the way they were? How were we supposed to weigh in on this... and to hold open-ended discussion on this topic, should I start a discussion in the Github instead?
-
my objection is there should have been more discussion and feedback from the community than a poll in the dev chat
-
so. moving forward. is the best place to discuss this in the forum area of the Github at this time?
-
I would suggest you create a discussion about this. I could do it myself, but I’ve already made a couple so I thought it would be better to let someone else take the initiative -
If I’m a lawyer or developer looking in and the CIPs were not completed as specified in CIP 1, how can I take CP seriously?
-
- 26 May 2024 (12 messages)
-
-
Like what? -
Not presently -
New card added to 17art collection
Blessedpepe
Total Supply: 37
https://xchain.io/tx/0d450a279e177760ce6b50d5c635f672a90f27beb8d56ac740b7c2a768fe9d1e - 27 May 2024 (7 messages)
-
Fun name, where can I invest lol. Looking forward to using the wallet and explorer. -
Will the code be open source
-
Can't wait to see the mobile version! Desperately needed to grow this community!
- 28 May 2024 (42 messages)
-
Fugg! Pumped at the thought!!
-
Just a bit exciting!
I also have a developer working on a counterparty financial ledger reporting system, that will address a need for those who require financial ledger exports for tax reporting purposes.
I'll have some more news on that in the near future. -
Taxes lol
-
-
Yeah lol, until it isn’t
-
Congrats! very excited for this 🎉🎉🎉 -
Those t@x agents r the worst. Guilty until proven innocent (which they r unlikely to admit).
-
pepe.wtf (@pepe__wtf) on X
Incredible news for @CounterpartyXCP 🎉🎉🎉 @UnspendableLabs, founded by the counterparty founders, is developing a new modern block explorer and an open source wallet, very needed tools for the ecosystem, new times ahead 🍸
-
-
?? What you mean? 🤔
-
QOUNTRY
https://xchain.io/asset/QOUNTRY
NEW CARD ADDED ON 17ART -
-
Cornholio and Adam on this panel
-
It’s being recorded so I’m sure the conf will release it at some point
-
-
Not enough battery left to record the whole thing
-
ffmad.xcp (@quentinbdb) on XBest conference of @NFCsummit: @agkrellenstein and @C0rnh0li0 talking about @CounterpartyXCP and Memes #Rarepepes
-
The Pepe cash watch ⌚ 🔥
-
I got one. I should have worn it
-
I got one too, but not even sure it's still working 🤔
-
Yours is still functional?
-
Yes. I don’t wear it so it’s in pristine condition
-
how to get pepecash watch? 😆 -
Originally I think you had to buy the card. Not sure if any are on secondary market
-
its super cool watch to have
-
I have still 4 I think
-
pepecash watch = hublot
-
or audemar piguet
-
LFG @c0rnh0li0
-
Pump it
-
She sold around 100 of them iirc
-
@c0rnh0li0 let’s see this watch, I don’t think I’ve ever seen
-
-
Damn that’s dope
-
That’s a real piece of history right there
-
-
Damn. 5 years too late
-
Did the watch come out in 2019 or pre 2019 when the card came out?
-
I was just searching twitter. It appears that when you bought her CHUNRIPEPE card the watch was included (in 2017). Then it reappeared for sale on its own in 2019.
-
She still holds 71 of the card. I might reach out and see what's available.
-
@mikeinspace got his for 2,000 PEPECASH which is less than the cost of a card submission! $20 - $70 range
- 29 May 2024 (19 messages)
-
2017 so much cooler than 2019
-
yeah, taxes are all a lol until you cop a three month desk audit
-
It is "watch resistant" too 😂. And something-something involving maids from China... 😜
Dank kek "watch resistant" pepecash watch -
-
-
-
-
-
ffmad.xcp (@quentinbdb) on X
All star panel today at @NFCsummit on the ascendancy of NFTs on #Bitcoin (spoiler: @CounterpartyXCP) With @shaban_shaame, @theog__ , @mikeinspace, @C0rnh0li0 and @jp_janssen
-
Haha is this a hand made bapepe tshirt
-
-
Pepe Alumni with Pepe
-
-
Gm yall -
Great conference in Lisbon and nice to meet Adam, Shaban, Nathan, Cornholio, Mr. Hansel, JP, Theo and other Counterparty OGs (many for the first time). Definitely bullish Counterparty. 🔥
-
Where did you guys decide to program the price to?
-
👏 👏 👏
- 30 May 2024 (19 messages)
-
What unit is set to $0.01? XCP after 2000:1 split?
-
Pls elaborate, this seems important 🙏
-
I think he’s just joking b/c I asked a joking question
-
wtb 100,000XCP @ $0.01 -
-
I'm in
-
Make it a double
-
-
buying up to 2,592,665.04 @ $0.01
-
Lol
-
Who selling XCP for .01$?
-
-
🤣
-
Anyone know if subassets are issuable on numerics or only on named assets?
-
honestly a great question - I havent ever seen a numeric with a subasset... so im gonna take an educated guess and say the feature is only reserved for named assets
-
Can’t really test using freewallet these days, so thought I’d ask
-
The sub-asset is numerical but it somehow resolves to a name. I seem to remember one of the core guys being against sub assets all together but it was implemented anyway.
-
but I don't know if you could mint rarepepe.1232324324234234 directly
-
There's probably a thread in the archived forums of this discussion somewhere
- 31 May 2024 (59 messages)
-
@S1MONS was that thumbs-up meant to be a confirmation? Looking for a definitive answer for something I'm contemplating
-
Hi! I'm trying to get the API response of XChain with python but It doesn't work, someone know about something similar to XChain or how to get the API Response? -
Only named assets can issue subassets
-
Check out https://xcp.dev/api
-
Thanks, I wasn't sure myself 😎 -
Damn it... kind of puts a wrench in my plans
-
On a panel in Lisbon yesterday the topic of royalty enforcement came up. I said they weren't enforceable. Turns out I was wrong. You just need to bring in the lawyers! 😂
https://x.com/MLeeJr/status/1796460604888330387mleejr (@MLeeJr) on Xyou go straight to jail if you dont comply with the yuga labs super punk world royalty payment obligation
-
GMONEY🧢₿⚡️🍊🐸💊 (@GMONEYPEPE) on X
Sorry ordinal fanboys Casey said he loves RAREPEPE & XCP #Bitcoin
-
WTS
CRACKEDDLHD,
SEETHRUPEPHD and
RAREORIGINS
All are Fake Rares -
Well I don’t expect it to be changed on my account, but thinking through a possible usecase. Need to write-up something formal first to get my idea coherently in writing
-
Named subassets to numerical assets is going to look really silly.
-
You don’t know what I’m proposing or how it will be used. I’ll try and release some documentation soon but it’s likely not what you’re thinking
-
sub assets on numericals sounds like going full retard
-
Free numbered subassets for a named asset would be great. -
this I agree with
-
I agree. That's why its gonna work.
-
So its an anti-squatting mechanism after all... I was told it was an anti-spam mechanism. 😁
-
Free subassets would be yuggge
-
Still have to pay to register main asset
-
100% agree on removing the XCP fee on subassets. Have been saying it for a while now 🔥
-
I think we finally found something everyone agrees on ❤️
-
Thx for posting it 🙏
-
And in the disagreements, treat each other with respect and with an open mind.
Is better for everyone if we move forward in agreement.
@teysol unblock me if you want my support for the latest proposals in GitHub 😊 -
Pretty easy solution here, use a named assets
-
Yes but subassets still cost to mint. Removing a fee for sub assets would make xcp way more scalable
-
And elevate named assets!
I like to call them super-assets because of their subasset creation capability. And is tied to similar programming concepts… -
-
a subasset is still an extension of a named asset (child). Numerics are free cuz you get no choice really other than numbers in the name. Named assets and subassets allow the user to customize the token name, a premium service, which should continue to pay the XCP fee. If your going to consider removing the fee on subassets, at LEAST increase the named asset registration cost. With no fee on subassets, one named asset registration would allow you to spam infinite subassets. IMO ppl should focus on adding NEW functionality, not changing, breaking, removing functionality.
-
But "spam" infinite subassets is already prevented by the bitcoin fees themselves
-
Exactly. We have to get over this idea that "use" automatically equals "spam" particularly if you we want Counterparty to scale to the levels of practically any other protocol in terms of use/users. There are 60 million inscriptions. I've never once heard Ordinal devs complaining about there being "too much usage".
-
Is not like people are currently fighting to use counterparty
-
maybe 5-10 registrations a day? This is orders of magnitude lower than where it needs to be in order to be viewed as a viable alternative to other protocols
-
Holders of named assets should be freaked the fuck out about this. This level of use is not good for anyone.
-
Also the big plundering of named assets has already occured in the past, you can find many accounts with hundreds and thousands of names reserved with no use at all
-
The value of all those named assets is tied to the ongoing health of the protocol itself. And yes users = health. No one will give a shit about named assets on a protocol no one uses. They'll register something on Ordinals instead. I'm sure there are all sorts of name protocols. Attracting users/use to Counterparty is critical even if you don't like the usecase.
-
if youre interested in scaling and a user is burning xcp to make it, i dont think a limit should be implemented.... in the event the older ideas like using MCAT (which would allow for multiple Counterparty functions from multiple addresses to be compressed into a single tx) then it could become "spam" worthy.... but even then, if you are burning xcp, I wouldnt consider it spam.... it would be pay to create as it has always been
-
as for this, they are discussing bringing in assets that start with A or less than 4 letter tokens.... which has been in continuous discussion since i got here in 2016
-
I'm gonna fight for AL
-
-
always the doomerfag in here
-
we are winning bigly waiting for the perfect time to strike
-
doomerfag? Dude, I don't know many people who promote counterparty more than I do. I wrote an article that covers a lot of the history and potential of Counterparty here: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/print/everything-old-is-new-again-Everything Old Is New Again
Ordinals, Stamps, and Counterparty. The history of NFTs on Bitcoin is not something new, in fact it is a very old story. From "The Inscription Issue."
-
Well you know me and I may qualify for this lol
-
I tried but Was not possible with Python, it's possible connect to Counterparty API?
-
api.counterparty.io
-
Xcpdev api is all simple gets, with exponential backoff pattern.
And it has a proxy to the lib/core rpc api. -
And is all free/libre open source software.
You can host your own (btc+xcp node and explorer):
https://github.com/CNTRPRTY/xcpdev/GitHub - CNTRPRTY/xcpdevContribute to CNTRPRTY/xcpdev development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
177417741774
Official Counterparty Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 May 2024 (41)
- 02 May 2024 (11)
- 03 May 2024 (12)
- 04 May 2024 (1)
- 05 May 2024 (32)
- 06 May 2024 (26)
- 07 May 2024 (141)
- 08 May 2024 (55)
- 09 May 2024 (4)
- 10 May 2024 (559)
- 11 May 2024 (314)
- 12 May 2024 (138)
- 13 May 2024 (307)
- 14 May 2024 (237)
- 15 May 2024 (74)
- 16 May 2024 (34)
- 17 May 2024 (9)
- 18 May 2024 (152)
- 19 May 2024 (154)
- 20 May 2024 (68)
- 21 May 2024 (179)
- 22 May 2024 (9)
- 23 May 2024 (25)
- 24 May 2024 (16)
- 25 May 2024 (18)
- 26 May 2024 (12)
- 27 May 2024 (7)
- 28 May 2024 (42)
- 29 May 2024 (19)
- 30 May 2024 (19)
- 31 May 2024 (59)