- 13 February 2024 (76 messages)
-
youd think it'd be a feature that was noted in the release notes or had a CIP -
-
how is this list any different than this one?
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib/releases?page=1Releases · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-libCounterparty Protocol Reference Implementation. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
and i didnt know how to read a github till less than a year ago.....
-
i think i still dont....
-
no worries - just wouldnt even know how to find it myself - tried searching "destroy" through some of the releases but still havent found a concrete answer yet
-
wouldnt be suprised if its called something else in the code or something
- 14 February 2024 (252 messages)
-
I'm to git blame for activating destroys on mainnet, the history is messy because of the way it was merged.
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib/pull/1006
chiguireitor commented on Sep 26, 2018
"Merged manually and Github interface not updating, closing"Enable destroy on mainnet by droplister · Pull Request #1006 · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-libThis pull request enables destroy on mainnet, as discussed here: #929
-
interesting - discussion by looney 2017 on it too
-
very unconventional but interesting nonetheless
-
Yes, I'm only to git blame. I didn't start the fire, it was always burning.
-
does seem like most of the discussion was in #929 anyway
-
"My guess would be that destroy is a risky proposition in that you could accidentally your whole asset, so I'm not totally surprised by it not being enabled. But it's awesome that it exists. People want this!
'Burning' is a fairly widely understood concept among Counterparty users. Often, we see them using any burn address they can cook up. SoG has done this. FoW has done this. Pepe cards have done this.
But the burn is not reflected by websites/applications that display total 'supply/issuance' or 'market cap', unless they create manual checks or exceptions." -
danderson throwing blows in the git
-
Why are you able to do this with cip33 and not with inscriptions?
Would inscriptions be significantly more money or not even possible? -
inscriptions would not be on bitcoin. or minimum the existence would be arguable. -
when saying it is forever on bitcoin, i meant it.
-
stamps/cip33 cant be lost. the only way to vanish is total data loss, all utxo's all ledger. (dead btc) what is unlikely
-
btw i believe even Rodamor himself do not understand what ordinals is. they are good until you try to understand them
-
nobody has a clue of what rare sats are or how to verify them
-
everybody "trust" on what they was told.
-
also witness data can be swept without a trace it ever existed.
-
this is not something we should call "on bitcoin"
-
so im looking at your tx on JPJA's mainnet cip33 explorer - how was the mid encoded? base64?.... how can i play the song with the info?
-
probably you will not be able to play it today. we need wider adoption and better tools/wallets/decoders.
-
we need midi audio decoder to play it, but i can share exact audio file that was stored with cip33
-
What about the argument someone must maintain a copy of all transactions and not every node can prune all inscriptions
I think I’m phrasing that correctly… -
what is "trasnactions" ?
-
ah so a music specific audio decoder with the raw data? ... similar to base64 but just a different decoder?
-
I’ve heard the argument that every node cannot prune all inscriptions
-
the only thing that is mandatory for bitcoin is UTXO data
-
-1 Alan
-
+1 Robert
-
everything else is not mandatory and can be swept very easy
-
There's many ways to insert data into the blockchain.
What inscriptions benefitted from is with just 1 method for doing so you can insert many different types of data. That's a neat trick, if you can do it.
Other buffs includes the witness discount, the halo of newness, and good timing.
But with this "one simple trick" you get something people can coordinate on and a distribution network for that data which became a flywheel.
The longevity is intriguing and speaks to value for investors, but I think what really makes it work is the distribution and that speaks to creators.
Having n+1 ways to store data isn't going to do the trick. Increasing the distribution network for the data is what works.
And it's easier to get that working if you have 1 standard that's easily adopted. -
UTXO is the fundamental thing. you can not make the nodes to ignore my files
-
no way.
-
1 standard that is adopted by everyone and especially the one that is arguably to exist is very unsafe IMO
-
how can you prove me ordinals exist ?
-
or lets say how can someone tell me they are on bitcoin
-
first NFTs on bitcoin
-
-
We could discuss the tech-y things, but the distribution that you get from ordinals is something enviable and worth striving to emulate.
-
best UI+UX
-
would agree on that
-
I can explain to you the algorithm for ordinals, the implementation of it is details.
-
okay. well anyway
-
first i would have to believe that sats exist right?
-
and that every of it is different and unique
-
-
i can bet 99.99% ordinals users couldnt explain where those nfts are stored or to prove their existence
-
what they going to show me an image on the web?
-
i can right click and save any image
-
but thats not nft
-
Dan you are from those 0.01% :))))
-
what kind of audio coding and decoding are you using to fit it in the raw data?
-
I can share my view on it...
Ordinals and Inscriptions are two components. The solid one is Ordinals.
It's a simple algorithm that's tightly coupled with Bitcoin-Bitcoin.
Has a lot of advantages over what we do with Counterparty, you get PSBT, easier to maintain consensus. The algo is the algo.
Then there are inscriptions. Which were a growth marketing tactic for the protocol. And the next growth marketing tactic is runes. But ordinals is really solid/simple.
Where inscriptions are straight forward, IMO, is that without all the software, if I just were to have the output, I can get the data. I don't need any indexing or validation. -
Growth marketing tactics for Counterparty, which I have advocated in the past and would still support include three letter asset names and making asset ownership tradeable.
-
i am using JPJA html that does all the job for me.
-
all you need to do is attach the file and bake it
-
Degen marketing tactics for Counterparty, is to 10x or 100x all balances. So supply becomes 26m or 260m.
-
interesting
-
thanks for sharing Dan
-
have you seen my videos?
-
Yes I like this
-
How would that be pulled off?
-
i have not
-
here
-
At some blockheight, you multiply XCP balances by 10 or 100.
-
start from there. in 10min you will be good to roll
-
It would be like a stock split, I think.
-
sounds like xcp printer go brr
-
better to have xcp rise in price and eventually cut down minting and protcol fees to 0.1x
-
like minting 0.05 etc.
-
Adam mentioned this earlier saying he wish they made the supply higher
-
Correct me if I’m wrong.
-
What I like to do is look for high leverage changes to software. Where the effort or input is low and the upside or output is high. And for me, that's stuff like three letter assets, assets that start with 'A', multiplying XCP balances.
-
imo PSBT is a high leverage change
-
I think that's a cool change, but high effort.
-
XCP balances would only be allocated to the holders at the time of the snapshot (holder of 1 XCP would then hold 100 XCP), so from the holders' perspective there is no loss/gain of value (still holding same % of existing XCP). -
theres always the case of xcp held on bigger exchanges - poloniex/bittrex
-
Ordinals is basically rebuilding Counterparty, people are excited about registering 13 character names in April.
-
btns already does that
-
No one knows what that is
-
lol
-
tru
-
distribution sirs
-
distribution
-
How would 3 letter assets make any difference
-
100%
-
People really want to register asset names on Bitcoin, due to Runes. They can't access three letter asset names until 4 years from now. Counterparty inserts itself into that narrative in a well-timed manner.
-
why cant they access names until 4 years from now?
-
Because Casey built a time release so every 3-4 months shorter names can be registered.
-
basically its base64 yes, every note has its weight
-
It's a squirrel-y idea.
-
i maxed out the tech already
-
yeah realized it was midi and made more sense too
-
that audio file is max i could make
-
at least for now
-
huh
-
bold move cotton
-
tru
-
you can do stuff like "¿" and other languages n stuff
-
does anyone collect old token names?
-
im sure i have untouched pepe name like 7 years old
-
or 6
-
but i mean old one.
-
-
this one?
-
I would buy ownership of an old, if I could buy them on a dispenser or for XCP. Not even necessarily because it is old, but for the asset name, like how I might want a domain name.
-
i think a DEx or system for token ownership sales would be a huge plus
-
nope. this one:
-
-
7 years.
-
theres a couple collections that include old relics with new art attached
-
yeah ive seen. maybe i should create something thanks!
-
Yes this is very obvious
-
They can be issued 100X their holdings as well, although those will probably never move either way.
-
its been discussed a few times - but I think most token holders or issuers know the value in owning token ownership - especially around the discussion of lock token issuance, lock token description, using subassets as an extra layer of functionality - as well as ownership of the name space on BTNS (again, i find it incredibly interesting)
-
What’s your argument here?
-
im for Token Ownership decentralized trading
-
Slutcoin, evilcoin, henryford, Lebu anyone?
-
WTS token ownership of HOJO
-
;)
-
I registered all the great Chinese warriors way back
-
I was like, the Chinese will by dying to buy these in a few years lmao
-
i somehow got BOCCACCIO and PETRARCH
-
-
Didn’t think it would take 9 YEARS
-
Speaking a different language
-
What does this mean?
-
3 Italian Kings of Literature
-
Dante's Inferno....
-
and the two lesser known
-
I don’t like books
-
This is muh first asset:
https://www.xcp.dev/asset/PROUD -
says the guy who makes pepe cards
-
you LOVE books
-
I’ve never made a pepecard
-
proud of you
-
Nice one, perfect first one.
-
X Series Cards
Meet the XCER X-Series, where cutting-edge tech meets classic cool. Each card is a one-of-a-kind treasure, backed with its unique serial number and loaded with a dual-layered crypto gift: a Bitcoin paper wallet and its matching NFT. This isn't just rare - it's a unique blend of the tangible and digital worlds, a true collector's dream. Bag your X-Series card now and unlock a new dimension of crypto collecting.
-
you put those in binders
-
Lmao
-
which are BOOKS
-
I guess I made lots of Pepe cards
-
blinders
-
-
it looks good!
-
-
Need to get Damian’s Naka destruction video on there
-
Those are epic —- probably going to be super rare one day.
-
Can anyone explain what happened to Bittrex and the XCP locked up there?
-
If I remember correctly, they gave final notice and said you will lose your XCP if you don’t withdraw
-
With stocks, if there is no owner after someone dies, it is atomically forfeited to the state
-
So I would guess the same it true with XCP and it belongs to the gov
-
Yeah, they halted trading of XCP in 2019 or 2020. Since then, they were sued by the SEC and their US branch declared bankruptcy -
So there are creditors that might make a claim on those
-
That’s also a possibility
-
A whale might be able to get all that xcp at a great discount -
Yeah, it wouldn't even take that big of a whale at today's valuations
-
Forfeit was the specific terminology
Either polo or Bittrex -
$2m for 10% of the supply
-
If it's actually transferred to the state, there might be an auction for it
-
Easiest way for the gov to get a big bag is by taking it
-
-
Yeah
-
At the time, I thought that was their way of getting the bag and that’s why it was delisted
-
Heh
-
XCP didn’t break any security laws so I never understood why they were forced to delist XCP
-
-
Jdog HATES my conspiracy, where @pappyG45
-
I don't think it was the gov rather internal personnel hating on Counterparty
-
volumes were low, so they had their justifications
-
Both Bittrex and Polo at the same time?
-
The only exchanges delisted at about the same time?
-
but there were other shitcoins still listed with lower volume
-
Yup
-
Yeah, it was a bit odd that they both did
-
It’s was $50k a day
-
plus the lack of support from many other exchanges
-
they all got drunk on premined shitcoins though
-
Coinbase is such a shitcoin casino, it’s amazing they get away with that
-
But don’t list XCP, but Adam was saying the node was a big burden on exchanges to list
-
So the new parsing speed should be a bigger incentive to list
-
I don’t know if Adam said this explicitly, but something of that sort from what I understood
-
Yeah, there may have been a number of unnecessary updates that had happened around that time that caused them too much of a headache and they threw in their respective towels
-
I remember Dan being frustrated trying to maintain a node for bitcorns
-
I didn't realize bittrex global had shut down too - at first it was just US
-
which had to have been 80-90% of their business
-
Amazing they shut down the two exchanges that never rugged anyone and replaced them with exchanges that rugged everyone
-
I loved Polo, I remember them yelling at me in the troll box lol
-
the old troll boxes were wonderful - I cut my teeth on btc-e and its trollbox
-
Are the nodes a bigger burden than that every tx in and out of an exchange is actually 2-3 txs?
-
I don’t know, but parsing for week is a burden lol
-
I've never maintained one myself, but just from observation, I would see them crash often and take days to get back up to speed
-
I think Adam added in bootstrap is not sufficient for most exchanges
-
🥶
-
I could only imagine the hassle, not worth it with lowish volume
-
Hey, i would love to know if i can interest counter party in a fundraising opportunity? -
its not spam.
-
Like Tim Draper's big buy of the SilkRoad BTC?
-
Yeah, I suppose that's how they do it
-
I forget the exact figure but I recall hearing the node cost was burdensome to the exchanges relative to the trading volume/income.
-
edit typo sir: CORNSPIRACY
-
-
-
Bittrex, Inc. | Free Bankruptcy Petition- Chapter 11 Filing District of Delaware
On May 08, 2023 Bittrex, Inc. filed for chapter 11 protection in the District of Delaware (Case No. 23-10598).
-
Here are some details - fincen is 9th on the creditor list at $3.5m
-
I'm guessing that's a fine that they just made up - SEC is undetermined
-
But their case hinged on them being an unlicensed securities exchange, and they have lost all of their suits regarding that
-
USDOT is #1 on the list at $24m
-
There were 2 customers that held over $10m on the exchange
-
-
17 total over $1m
-
They list that they hold $500m-$1B in assets and owe that much too
-
This was filed May of 2023 when BTC was $28k, so they'll probably just pay customers out in USD and the lawyers and gov agencies will rake in all the profit
-
JA//MIE (@robotlovecoffee) on X
My XCP fednode is getting closer... As BTC price goes up inscribing is going to get very $$$, XCP is going to be a great option to get art on BTC
-
polo still has some of my shitcoins somewhere I probably even had xcp and had no idea what it was back then lol -
Are you admitting to being a shitcoiner back in the day
-
yes I have sinned forgive me
-
Maybe someone sent you something -
Zero balance. Maybe you got hacked
-
ed33b960c237caca234308c1e74d7f5f50898791b1b1fe86b6319641837ca600
This TX? Sorry dont mean to be nosy kek -
The txs stay in the mempool a lot longer than we think
4 days ago fees were super low -
Submitted 3 months ago, confirmed 4 days ago!
-
Either does ChatGPT
-
Maybe there is a miner storing all txs regardless of fee size and not dropping them?
-
Might be a funny prank to spin up a node that does nothing but rebroadcast txns that won’t confirm so they never get dropped.
-
Everyone will love you even more
-
This happened to me a few months back.
I loaded Xcer cards and thought the tx was dropped, so I sent another MPMA to load the cards.
A couple months later, all the cards had 2x the assets in them. -
Even better, why not keep your Stamps project on CP/XCP and ride with us back to ATH of roughly 0.011 XCP/BTC?
-
Stamps is on counterparty and we've had fruitful discussions with the founders about potentially bringing src-20 back onto counterparty as well. That being said, the price of xcp is completely irrelevant to any such discussions. It's not a motivating factor whatsoever. We will decide what is best for Stamps and the Stamps ecosystem.
-
oh tx's can sit there for a LONG time - i had a send to me sit in unconfirmed, get dropped, then get picked up again by nodes that previously showed no data for the tx over 3 months
-
honestly I would take a wild guess and say that there has to be..... or some of these tx's wouldnt see the light of day
- 15 February 2024 (67 messages)
-
Periwig is there a specific reason why DEX orders have a hard limit of 8,000 blocks (forget exact number) before they expire?
-
Approx 56 days, 8,064 blocks is the max dex length before an order expires
-
XCP getting rare AF 🔥🎉🌶️🐉
-
Or set up a dispenser. -
You can also try OTC, https://t.me/xcpdesk, but be careful who you are dealing with. DM's are usually scammers
-
Nice to see a desire of people wanting to hold XCP
-
Sora Ventures (@sora_ventures) on XBitcoin Utility Q1 2024
-
No mention of Xcp
-
🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
-
They will when its too late kek
-
VC retardation
-
Its ok, VC doesnt really have a place with Pepe
-
For sure
-
But Xcp said a more than pepe too it’s just a bold move by these idiots
-
-
S E C R E T D A N K S
-
-
Maybe they just don’t know.
-
I found XCP when CMC had like 3 coins, so it was easy for me.
Now there’s 10,000’s -
They r retards then
-
It’s funny because I thought it was the greatest thing ever.
Today: still think it’s the greatest thing ever -
Haha 4 sure
-
Institute of Secret Danks broken
-
Counterparty made it. I see Stamps. 😜
-
Chill out dawg pound gangsta
-
I see real stamps and I see bullshit stamps… they like the bullshit stamps
-
My brain is still warming up to mint tokens
It’s like a selling a fake company to people issued by lots instead of a single
could be wrong -
Congrats though, very impressive what you created
-
If it’s just switching a max block height in the code and it wasn’t done for any technical reasons, I think dex users would prefer a much longer expiration date.
It would also help with liquidity on the dex.
That’s what’s great about dispensers, set it and forget it -
interesting i just got this email from a brokerage (and i feel like this timing uniform across platforms) "Good Till Close" actually means will be cancelled in 60 days in the boomer casino, so maybe that's where the length came from.. -
a chinese cesspool? ya real great contribution kek
-
It’s nice to have things expire so that the protocol doesn’t become encumbered by a lot of escrowed balances with no definite closing time. Like how you don’t want to write code with infinite loops, usually.
It probably wouldn’t matter if they could be open forever, but I think it gives some flexibility to and is helpful for if the protocol wants to juke left or right to not have such open ended contracts. -
Bump it up though why not
-
Good idea imo
-
Like say in the future you want to rework dispensers considerably.
Do you close all open dispensers or you try to leave them alone? They are sort of anchored to a version. But I like that we have them. -
Do you close them? That would probably be best.
-
Mikes stealing their Bitcoin. 😆
-
-
there have been discussions about extending XCP DEx order expiration length before
-
If it adds a potential protocol burden, perhaps a higher xcp fee should be added for extended durations to deal with the externality cost
-
that was discussed
-
let me find it.... i think its in the forums
-
Increase max order expiration
A number of users in the community have expressed frustrations with the current max order expiration of 8064 blocks (2 months). The purpose of this post is to discuss interest in increasing the max order expiration and if so, what should the max allowed be? 1.) Could increasing the max_expiration have any negative effects on the CP system (more orders to check for matches each block, etc)? 2.) What should the max_expiration be increased to? (48,384 blocks = 1 year) Thoughts?
-
im sure there is another place it is discussed but that's the one i could find the easiest
-
how would you go about getting it listed?im assuming on other exchanges -
im just wondering how they set the price and how that works when most the coins are held already?
-
the exchange
-
would definetely get alot more attraction nontheless
-
It needs to be an exchange with:
*Name recognition (well-known/respected)
*High liquidity
*Relatively loose KYC requirements
Kucoin seems like a good option, although there are probably people here who have better ideas. - 16 February 2024 (29 messages)
-
Where did all the XCP sellers go?
Anyone else smell a bull market coming? -
-
quit buying xcp i need moar
-
-
Have no fear ——
I set up a dispenser at the ATH vs. BTC:
https://xchain.io/tx/310d424ac79642838f9b7cef3c321530889f3653d641054ce9092caf2a2190bf -
-
Emblem vault discord hacked dont click links frens -
desktopcommando.bit.btc.eth.tez (@DesktopCommando) on XUntil further notice Emblems - Discord has been hacked, DONT connect to any offers @EmblemVault #Coval @shannonNullCode @jakegallen_ @discord_support https://t.co/a1EDkOEORo @adamamcbride
-
If a discord has not been hacked is it even a discord? -
-
-
3 years of receiving with no debits
-
164,000 XCP
-
The mystery mega-wallet.
Possibly a whale? -
-
Probably Mike in space
-
silver whale
-
Secret love affair with XCP ❤️
-
It does seem like a lot of Japanese assets are associated with it
-
FREEHONGKONG 💪
-
Bro Oasis Mining was SO slept on 🤦♂️
-
desktopcommando.bit.btc.eth.tez (@DesktopCommando) on X
@EmblemVault's Discord has now been contained on an account level - they did not have full admin privelages and we were able to boot the user account from the Channel - we are assessing audit logs before allowing chats again
-
tokenization is coming...
Have you done your research on rare pepe's anon?
Counterparty XCP will be the new stonk exchange -
Koji?
-
i dont call no one
- 17 February 2024 (40 messages)
-
Just a heads up I’m selling a full counterparty wallet loaded with goodys dating back to 2014 . Value is around 40-50btc selling for a mere % of that if anyone is interested jump in my dms. -
Periwig is there any plans to integrate a stablecoin like tether into the ecosystem? Seems like the dividends option doesn’t really make sense without some sort of stablecoin
-
With a stable usd coin, people could trade Bitcoin without leaving the BTC network for a CEX
-
Seems like a big deal
-
pepecash -
If we 100X the supply, $6 is $600
To reach price parity with Ordi, we need $640 XCP at current supply
Prior I would totally be against increasing the supply since the founders set it, but now that the founders are back, I’m all for it -
But like someone said above, it’s not really increasing the supply and hurting holders, more like a stock split
-
Callback feature is needed imo for securities, being able to individually callback assets in specific wallets would be even better
-
Or maybe a modifiable whitelist, maybe that’s even better
-
I’m sure Adam knows better than anyone here what’s needed 😆
-
100x would mean $6 is $0.06
-
Yea and 100X that
-
Okay, I see what you’re getting at
-
Super bullish after listening to this.....
For those who missed it:
Counterparty's Past & Future
Jan. 27, 2024
Adam Krellenstein returns to Counterparty after a 9-year hiatus. We dig into Counterparty's current and future state with one of its OG founders.
https://open.spotify.com/episode/6Z4WrP6PNXg7aPd0Alu3qj?si=u8zldYx0Q463C3k9tD3-xQ&nd=1&dlsi=419a32bcb88448a1 -
I was in the special grammar class in 3rd grade
-
I think the programmability of assets would allow this
-
I’m also a highly regarded language person
-
Lmao
-
People would have to alter their dispensers to make sales, but it wouldn’t cause anyone to sell for too cheap. So there’s no concern there.
-
The perceived liquidity would likely increase with 250M supply rather than 2.5M
-
A quick scan of top 100 coins, and I think BTC or Monero have the lowest supplies 18 million
-
Do you multiple the burn rate also or leave it?
-
There would not be a new burn. Just adding zeroes to everyone’s balance. The historical burn rate value would still be the same.
-
I mean issuing an asset, etc…
-
Ah yeah, good question
-
I’ve seen people kicking around the idea of making it a dynamic fee structure rather than an arbitrary amount.
-
I’m still a fan of burning XCP, since it all ties back to the initial proof of burn
-
Plus it was a commitment since launch to holders
-
Removing the burn is a breach of contract with prior holders
-
Was it? When you look at the oldest assets like TEST or LEET, the fee displays 0.00000000 XCP
-
At some point, it was a paltry 0.00000005 XCP
-
I was always curious about that
-
Was it Doge the first asset that burned XCP 0.5?
-
I always liked the idea of the burn
-
Eerily similar situation for XCP (only at a slightly smaller scale 😄)
-
But supply is also infinitely smaller.......a small influx of buy orders and BOOM
- 18 February 2024 (35 messages)
-
-
-
That’s some volume
-
Worth listening to a few times — some gems in there.
-
quick recap?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The founders and the core dev team are killing it, we should just let them keep rolling
-
I’m going to be releasing some sub assets for the KEKSBASILISK. Can someone remind me of some sub asset basics please? Is it a new name space for a sub asset, or does it have to be an unclaimed name space compared to *all* XCP assets? -
If there happens to be any KEKSBASILISK holders here, here’s a paste about the details:
-
Oracles of Kek (v1.0) [2/18/24]To commemorate the 7th birthday of the KEKSBA - Pastebin.com
Pastebin.com is the number one paste tool since 2002. Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time.
-
DexTrade is volume and price I believe
Pretty sure a bot is running over there, but I’ve never seen it this high -
Definitely
-
im thinking its taking into account all the orders being placed not just sold
-
Updated list of dispensers XCP? - 19 February 2024 (27 messages)
-
Last year??
-
Kek youre good fren i think
-
How do you buy XCP? The dex doesn't seem to have anything. -
@Megladon87 -
i bought a few dozens of XCP on dex-trade -
it's actually a centralized exchange
-
Selling a huge counterparty wallet if anyone interested jump
In my dms -
I dunno who tf you are but everyone in here can vouch for me ☺️
-
Yeah please dont jump the gun
-
There is an imposter of me going around trying to scam people. They are using a trick where they hide their username in TG privacy settings and then putting my handle in their bio so it looks “legit”. Please be vigilant and don’t fall for these tricks. I will not contact you unsolicited to make “deals”.
-
-
Telegram really needs to fix this. I didn’t realize you could suppress your handle. Makes it way too easy to impersonate
-
How do you make your Telegram public username private?
Answer (1 of 3): Making your Telegram public username private is a straightforward process that helps enhance your privacy on the platform. While prm4u focuses on amplifying your social media engagement across various platforms in a compliant and qualitative manner, it recognizes the importance o...
-
Sorry bros, every time I get it a DM about crypto it smells 99% like a scammer, so for better or worse, the invitation to "jump in my DMs to purchase a counterparty wallet" sounded similar.
-
- 20 February 2024 (36 messages)
-
a rapid question -
i'm making an asset on freewallet with testnet and i want put an image in my asset, how i can do it?
-
i didn't found my asset on CoinDaddy idk how i can search Tesnet Assets/Token
-
I can't use my testnet bitcoin address
-
CoinDaddy don't make me able to do that
-
counterwallet.io wallets are not working anymore? -
just testnet servers are avaliable
-
A lot of broadcast transactions happening today - minting GAS (mimicking Ethereum?) and they are not paying any XCP fees in the process
-
-
That's a BTNS mint I think
-
Correct - why not fork BTNS off like SRC did?
-
Similar to zero issuance numerics i guess -
Where i need put the Link of imgur?
-
You can use rpw.wtf and it does everything automatically for you with ipfs
-
okay nice, but how i can put it
-
replacing this
-
i can't send a picture but xD, it's the logo of XCP when i create a Token, and i want change the Logo of XCP
-
does counterparty need a name change?
-
sort of like a rebrand revival after 10 years
-
nope its perfect the way it is
-
how i can change the icon of XCP for mine for my token
-
how i can put an icon
-
It auto populates after x time
-
Socks matter - 21 February 2024 (56 messages)
-
Bitfinex (@bitfinex) on X
What are Bitcoin Stamps? Controversial or innovative? Embedding art directly onto the #Bitcoin blockchain presents a revolutionary step for digital collectables. Ensuring artwork's permanence and immutability provides more utility to $BTC. Read more👇 https://t.co/2jhKxZIm7c
-
Official Counterparty Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 Feb 2024 (45)
- 02 Feb 2024 (57)
- 03 Feb 2024 (40)
- 04 Feb 2024 (11)
- 05 Feb 2024 (7)
- 06 Feb 2024 (7)
- 07 Feb 2024 (2)
- 08 Feb 2024 (25)
- 09 Feb 2024 (30)
- 10 Feb 2024 (12)
- 11 Feb 2024 (66)
- 12 Feb 2024 (132)
- 13 Feb 2024 (76)
- 14 Feb 2024 (252)
- 15 Feb 2024 (67)
- 16 Feb 2024 (29)
- 17 Feb 2024 (40)
- 18 Feb 2024 (35)
- 19 Feb 2024 (27)
- 20 Feb 2024 (36)
- 21 Feb 2024 (56)
- 22 Feb 2024 (53)
- 23 Feb 2024 (196)
- 24 Feb 2024 (216)
- 25 Feb 2024 (14)
- 26 Feb 2024 (26)
- 27 Feb 2024 (8)
- 28 Feb 2024 (19)
- 29 Feb 2024 (358)