- 21 February 2024 (56 messages)
-
-
ive gotten that too. sometimes you have to close the wallet, wait a minute, then restart the wallet and do the action again -
Can we see your order, I’m curious what the 0 is. -
@droplister check dms ser 👀 -
🔖,
Duly. -
is xcpswap possible in future? Like a uniswap style xcp/btc pool? Would be an upgrade on dispensers. -
I doubt it can be done with BTC -
Wow, that would be a great opportunity to roll-out the new logo. -
-
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/press-releases/bitcoin-magazine-editorial-policy-on-bitcoin-layer-2s-l2sBitcoin Magazine Editorial Policy On Bitcoin Layer 2sBitcoin Magazine's editorial policy concerning coverage of layer two protocols built on the Bitcoin network.
-
For sure an interesting article
-
-
I see the stacks guys full blown in defence over this statement
-
Would this potentially open up the dex to ordinals too or would it be something else entirely? -
-
So by definition CounterParty is valid for Bitcoin Magazine coverage.
-
lightening also a valid L2
-
Funny the guy who invented ivermectin in which kills parasites was named satoshi - 22 February 2024 (53 messages)
-
This would be insane
-
Apparently it also kills your sperm -
-
There is no virus brother
-
I wonder, if there was an ability to turn an asset back into xcp, if that would be a positive feature -
Probably not
-
Typing out loud
-
I think he means if you issued an asset, you can return it back for XCP
-
That's why there is AI
Artificial Insemination 🤣 -
Trading of asset names would be fun
-
I really like JPs random dispensing dispenser, that also be really fun
-
Like a big slot machine?
-
Ha basically
-
The dispenser owner would be able fill the dispenser with multiple cards
-
Haha yeah. Wishing I had more xcp rn
-
Do you want to buy my Mesothelioma asset
-
Is that this? https://www.xcp.dev/tx/81ad764fcc147623df3a927f3323b9ca87154951f4b3617189d8c8c63fb4123e
Someone has been hitting multiple XCP dispensers in one tx -
Outside of what appears to be one person, I have not noticed it being used.
-
New feature rolled out in October 2023
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib/pull/1222allow triggering of dispensers by all tx outputs, not just the first output by pataegrillo · Pull Request #1222 · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-libCounterparty Protocol Reference Implementation. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
This would explain why syncing became so, so, slow lately
-
In the Freewallet Support chat..... I would say almost no people we speak with have used this feature.... I kinda didnt even know it existed.... (and we've been publicly solving/documenting issues in there for about 6 months now)
reading into it, looks like JPJA had some issues with it and maybe it should be reconsidered as a CIP and implemented in a different way -
nono i mean having a CIP to formally discuss it.... should have happened in the first place
-
not a CIP to remove it.... but thats just my opinion.... not much use for it in my world.... just my 2 sats
-
though with Dan's new proof of concept website for XCP functions it does seem like there is a few of these functions in the protocol that basically never get used.... for instance the historical "Rock Paper Scissors" function:
-
its the first ive seen data on each function before!
-
This is really great news if you've found the problem 👑
-
I just gave up on syncing my node a few weeks ago
-
I'm probably not the only one
-
knowing RobotLoveCoffee is looking into this (and makes amazing tutorials) I can easily see a future that if getting a node up is easier and has good easy documentation on how to do so...... MANY MANY of the people (especially OG's) in the community will happily start running a node
-
thanks to all of yall for being so active recently.... the github issues looks so clean and organized now its quite a treat to follow the improvements!
-
us users get a distinct aesthetic pleasure out of it too
-
the milestones page is so freakin nice
-
i would assume it would be cheaper dispenses by multi-sending BTC to multiple places instead of sending BTC individually
and with this tx - looks like it would be used to sweep up the floor of XCP in one tx instead of multiple - 23 February 2024 (196 messages)
-
how i can put the image of icon in my asset? -
i was trying change the xcp icon to change the XCP icon for my logo
-
but idk how to do it in Testnet
-
Ummm.. this sounds like the cart tool
-
Triggering more then 1 Dispenser with 1 TX?
-
I vote kill it if it’s slowing you guys down and only being used by a handful of users.
-
I don't think a cip is necessary to remove it. A github issue is sufficient imo.
It was implemented under the assumption of NOT increasing parsing time, which turns out to be false.
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib/issues/1148Just 1st dispenser dispenses when batch-sending sats to multiple dispensers · Issue #1148 · CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-libThis is the transaction (generated with a simple blue wallet) https://blockstream.info/tx/11eb2b730e2e383a657c51d7b04bd55271d1e86ac9a2c74d3e3f6c78e88e23ff where correct exact sats were sent to 5 di...
-
but this has been working for ages right? -
you can send to multiple dispensers using electrum "pay to many" send function.
address, amount
address, amount
and etc.
each address and amount from the new line.
new electrum updates will not let you to send zero. means op_returns has to be executed with version 4.3.4 -
Apparently the dispenser logic only read the first output of a tx before
-
It seems backwards to me
-
if someone will need help with electrum+counterparty just ping me and ill walk thru 😊
-
If a wallet has an incoming transaction, you’d think it wouldn’t matter where it’s located within a transaction
-
So you’ve been the buyer using it? (I would have guessed that)
-
recently ?
-
nope not me.
-
but i have used this to buy other assets
-
and it works
-
i am sure it works.
-
i can show example of the dispenses
-
but in private.
-
Yeah, someone has been sweeping dispensers using multiple outputs in one tx
-
message me
-
ill show 20 assets dispense
-
to everyone who is having a coffee right now, here is a good read:
https://github.com/stampchain-io/stamps/blob/main/OLGA.md
i am very bulish to be honest, i love the idea and my merits goes for cip33 artefacts 🙏🔥stamps/OLGA.md at main · stampchain-io/stampsContribute to stampchain-io/stamps development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
BTW, stamps team was not the first to test this tech, and feedbacks came from the people who did. not including prefix of FILE: to be as official is a disrespect to the early adopters. All the data is on BTC anyway, for me the assets with FILE: prefix will always stay the first ones in cip33 fields.
in short words cip33 got attention just because some people released cips33 with file: prefix and shared on-chain results.
show us some respect, or else we will have to create our own parser indexer that would show CORRECT data :)
i am good to donate for the development of course (message me). -
Do you think they care about your file prefix
-
But if JP is happy, that’s all that matters since he’s the inventor
-
Do you think i care of what they think lol?
-
data is on bitcoin
-
no brainer
-
opinion stay as opinion, proof is on BTC
-
we can argue all day long
-
i "tested" fields with thousands of dollars on mainnet
-
they saw its a cool tech
-
and now they will "start" as first people , right?
-
is that you want to tell me ? :)
-
my thausands of dollars i spent on those UTXO's are "not official" ? :D
-
I’d say File is the first
-
for me they are as official as they can be, its on btc like i said.
-
because they are first cip33's truly
-
btw can someone help with a quick picture of server settings for FW?
-
getting stuck "last updated 2 days ago"
-
-
or should i try coindaddy server?
-
-
ahhh not me alone, most of servers are down today.
-
-
-
thanks
-
My view is laissez-faire. I gave the algo to the public domain. It is not like I can (or should) tell people what to do.
That said, I really appreciate the first ones to explore cip33. They took on risk by burning sats through a (by then) unrecognized encoding method. -
That’s very nice of you
-
JPJA is legend
-
-
what comes to your electrum+op_return tool. i have made about 7k transactions using it. i can say it works. just about everytime haha. i can not imagine my life without it
-
-
4.3.4 version only
-
as OP_return would be sending "0" btc
-
and new version see it as "dust" and would reject
-
i use 4.3.4 electrum + https://jpja.github.io/Electrum-Counterparty/
-
i just dont get the "activation" idea.
its like they will ignore UTXO's lol?
its all about what do we index right?
people are too lazy to verify. they will lazy trust on the words.
If Mike said 833000 block is first, means its first -
there were no NFTs before ordinals right? why not to take this as reality. we can simply ignore the rare pepes too and pretend ordinals were first ever jpegs on the screens
-
-
if you want to activate it you have to send me 1btc
-
if they had those first assets.. oh boy.. they would find time, strenght and braveness to implement file: prefix too
-
but it is more simplier to ignore the ones who tested the tech first and start over like nothing happen. require less labor and time. sure you do it :)
-
Stamps use the STAMP prefix. If you’re mad about it, start your own indexer.
-
then dont write "avtivated"
-
and dont sell them ass first
-
if i see someone selling cat in a bag
-
ill come shouting
-
-
Who said they are first? We literally gave credit to JP
-
we keep the first ones. we fully deserved.
-
i even helped others to strike first files
-
and i respect those people who took a risk to join on the "blind" attempt
-
Cool. Then why do you want to be in the 300,000 range of stamps? Be first in your own indexer
-
oh i have a lot stamps
-
minted shitloads of early stamps too
-
i love the tech its all good with it
-
and of course you are the boss at your project
-
i cant impact on your decisions much
-
i hope you will do your best :) good luck guys
-
Yeah I even sold you a few and then bought them back from you on scarce city for 1/10th the price. Thanks for that. Flipped a few a second time for even more.
-
yeah thats me
-
you see i am a good guy
-
i just sent you thousands of bucks back hhaaa
-
Well you did go on an angry tirade on the scarce city chat once with no evidence at all
-
-
Anyways, the OLGA activation was to prevent renumbering. No different than data:base64 should those be valid too? Stamps have always had a STAMP prefix. Your stuff uses FILE
-
it was not related to tech back then. but more of how friendly the tg community was. it is not actual at the moment .)
-
yep but cip33 was coded to use file
-
ok but i got you
-
as i said. your project , you are the boss
-
We’re not using CIP33. We forked it with JP’s blessing
-
our opinion means nothing to you. and i know jpja and few others will help of indexing "file" prefix too
-
cip33s files will see a daylight sooner or later
-
Not even correct. I’m not a coder. Kevin picked the block height as he needs to actually maintain a code base
-
Anyway, as more stampers strike cip33s as better
-
so i dont mind you guys to strike them 1 million on the first day
-
And this is actually in your best interest. Why would you want to be stamp #299387 rather than file #1?
-
you are right
-
probably another directory would be best
-
we talked about this "join or separete" question , always had positives and negatives answers
-
probably the desicion you made will come for the better of everyone
-
we live and see
-
good luck the devs and the team and thanks for this new tech JPJA. it is realy the most friendly way to store on utxo's. go green - use olga stamps
-
Interested to see if anyone is playing around with Slipstream. Craft a transaction with a HUGE OP_RETURN payload? Craft a transaction with bare multsig outputs below the dust limit? A lot of possibilities...
https://x.com/MarathonDH/status/1760760062442627084?s=20Marathon Digital Holdings (NASDAQ: MARA) (@MarathonDH) on XToday’s non-standard transactions often get excluded from the collective mempool, even if they adhere to consensus rules. Via Slipstream, users can submit directly to Marathon, avoid confirmation delays, and expedite its processing onto a public Bitcoin block.
-
wow thanks for sharing this
-
I see a LOT of XCP being bought wholesale.... whats the skinny? Someone knows something LOL -
... shoulda bought more ....
-
fun fact: its also true
-
We ARE still early.
The amount of full time developers in the space as a whole, the amount of apps and services available across the entire spectrum ... all still in their infancy ... why?
Cos all this is not even 12-13 years old yet....
annoying but true... time is required and while the demand may be NOW, the ability to deliver to that demand is not as high ..
so yeah ... still early is a sad and blunt fact ... -
but as the financial incentives grow so does the pool of skill and resource :)
-
agreed, it can be very emotive sometimes
-
but then money always makes people cranky
-
and some people over leverage themselves with their enthusiasm and get themselves wrapped up in a situation they want resolved "now" ... c'est la vie LOL
-
The price is $10.60
Lowest dispensers, dex trade -
Xchain is dextrades last price
-
Go to cmc, XCP, markets
-
Click that link
-
Link
Buy Bitcoin and Crypto, trade over 500+ coins, stake, try demo trading, and get soaked in play2earn games. Welcome to the cryptocurrency exchange of the free
-
I’ve noticed that
-
Dispensers are probably a good indicator..........I look at the price area where there are the most large dispensers.
-
-
-
-
-
LinkDetailed insights into Counterparty assets and their activities.
-
People are scrambling pepe sell orders to get xcp -
Starting to feel like the dark horse of 2024 🐉
-
i am doing this for sure lol
-
same energy
-
-
BTC ---> XCP (Leveraged BTC) ----> PEPES (Leveraged XCP)
-----X <- we are entering this phase -
BTC ---> XCP (Leveraged BTC) ----> PEPES (Leveraged XCP)
-----COCO (leveraged Artist assets) ——— PSBT <- we are entering this phase -
-
Though I’m merely trying to distribute for xcp, not really selling anything I only have one of. Opportunity cost would be too high
-
Chyyyyna
-
If they couldn't sleep at night, they wouldn't be doing it.
People with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) or psychopathy tend to have a lack of remorse for their actions or empathy for others. -
you get that psychology assessment from a guy selling xcp at market prices? -
I think the assertion is they are selling at 10X market prices (by deceptively dispensing .1 XCP instead of 1 XCP).
-
so someone is buying xcp at 10x market price?
-
-
As shown above, someone is deceptively selling 0.1 XCP at slightly below the price others are selling 1 XCP.
Clearly they are hoping someone in a hurry to buy will send funds to the dispenser without noticing they will only receive 1/10 the amount they think they are buying. -
or maybe he thinks thats how much there worth to him
-
I'd be interested to hear if any other people here think that is a convincing explanation of that dispenser.
-
your right he's probably a psycho
-
Apparently there are a number of psychological disorders in which the person lacks empathy for others, lacks remorse for hurting others, is comfortable telling lies/deceiving others, etc.
Unfortunately empaths have trouble imagining this sort of personality and have to learn about it through the painful experience of dealing with them (and hopefully studying the subject a bit to learn how to protect themselves). -
IMHO this explanation (subjective sense of value of an item) is reasonable for an authentic piece of rare art, antique, rare pepe, etc., but not for an essentially fungible currency/commodity like XCP, BTC, gold, etc.
-
Xchain now shows an alert on results pages. Not sure why that alert isn’t shown directly on the dispenser pages. That would solve the issue 99% of the time.
-
Could you send a screenshot? I hadn't heard of that.
-
it turns yellow doesnt it
-
Bitcoin Stamps Meaning | Ledger
Bitcoin stamps define the technique of embedding metadata within Bitcoin transaction outputs.
-
-
Oh god the misinformation is terrible. It’s often sounds like it was written by ChatGPT
-
No
-
I believe he’s still on TG, so it’s not like he can’t be contacted
-
You were right Munehisa,we shall call the person that set up that dispenser the xcp bandit
-
Not that I’m aware of. He went radio silent years ago
-
no the briar patch is the beer gardens at a curling bonspiel
-
Yeah that existed at one point. He deleted it
-
I was just remembering him and Bitcoin Uncensored. Those guys were entertaining.
-
Freewallet doesn't do that when I look at the dispensers. Any idea how this works?
-
idk about freewallet, just commenting on xchain
-
It works by highlighting any xcp dispenser that isn’t for 1.0, I imagine
- 24 February 2024 (216 messages)
-
OK, yeah I saw that. Thank you.
-
OK, so I've noticed the dispensers are displayed in green, pink, and yellow.
Clearly the yellow is a warning, but what is the difference between the pink and green dispensers? -
Pink means it’s closed
-
Thanks man.
-
Really a soft red
-
The natural order is returning ...
-
yo ordi is 1.2 billion market cap
-
-
xcp 26 million rofl
-
is ordi to ordinals as xcp to counterparty?
-
XCP could 10x and still be cheap
-
Back in 2015 XCP was ranked in the top 20 of market cap —- maybe the OGs will take us back there again!
-
so that psycho with the xcp dispenser could be right
-
*IF* XCP were to return to the top 20 market cap ranking —- that would give XCP a market cap in excess of $5 billion.
Which translates to an XCP price of $1923........
Obviously not a prediction, closer to a dream, but why not..........the OGs are back and new developments are just over the horizon. -
Bitcoin cash is still in the top 20 😜.
-
Seems like some of the competition is pretty soft.......
-
Whoa…… beyond lamboland
-
-
Can anyone think of a reason the next generation counterparty will not kick bitcoincash’s arse?
-
updated for NFT Paris : https://blockchainizator.com/media/PEPETHESOG_the-legend_making-of_2024.gif (promotion of Counterparty in the 1st image) -
So quiet in here…. Everyone wondering how to get a serious XCP bag before the fireworks start? 🤔
-
For those who missed it:
Counterparty's Past & Future
Jan. 27, 2024
Adam Krellenstein returns to Counterparty after a 9-year hiatus. We dig into Counterparty's current and future state with one of its OG founders.
https://open.spotify.com/episode/6Z4WrP6PNXg7aPd0Alu3qj?si=u8zldYx0Q463C3k9tD3-xQ&nd=1&dlsi=419a32bcb88448a1 -
-
That 100:1 supply change would mean it’d be $19.23
I think it would help people’s unit bias even at today’s low market cap. $10 feels expensive for a “shitcoin”. 10¢ feels more likely to give a 10x or a 100x return -
I really like this idea
-
This certainly seems like a vote by XCP holders would make sense with this
-
Let’s hold an XCP vote
-
What are good counterarguments? One I think of is the perception of centralization
-
Credibility
-
It might look bad, even if there's nothing wrong with it
-
The same is true for Bitcoin too with its changes?
-
Look bad to who?
-
With a gas system, do users really want to be dealing in 0.00001
-
Imagine if Bitcoin did this and suddenly max supply is 2.1 billion
-
hello to everyone , can i use dex-trade even without kyc ? wanted to buy some XCP -
also which wallet do you reccomend to use to store XCP?
-
freewallet.io No KYC necessary
-
You can also use rarepepewallet.com
-
ok thanks i will use one of these wallets
-
and for buy? can i use dex trade without kyc ?
-
i just wanted to buy 100 counterparty
-
Yeah, there's no kyc on there
-
Counterargument is you can simply decrease XCP fees if price goes up
-
where it once cost 0.5 xcp for an asset it could cost 0.05 or 0.005
-
xcp is the gas mechanism
-
btc tx is the gas
-
Would you care if you received the same percentage Bitcoin?
-
The 21M is such a powerful meme that I would care. There’s some technical reasoning behind it too that might require the decimals to be shifted left two spaces, but that may no longer be an issue.
-
I’m wondering if all open DEx orders would automatically adjust too. It’d be tragic if they suddenly became 100x cheaper.
-
I doubt it would be 100x cheaper
-
If something listed at 100 XCP would be able to be purchased by someone who had 1 XCP before the adjustment, it’d be 100x cheaper
-
Joe Burnett (🔑)³ (@IIICapital) on X
Satoshi Nakamoto supported adjusting #bitcoin's decimal places, similar to a stock split. 1 bitcoin = 100,000,000 bitcoin
-
Interesting to open up X and see this pop up at the top of my feed
-
I don’t even follow them
-
-
Dude go heavy, at least get 1000枚 if not 10,000枚
-
-
Once the 0.00027900 -- 1994 XCP gets taken out it's going to get interesting.
-
That’s crazy
-
I love my PepeCash
This song was created by anonymous pepecash fans guided by Kek. Buy Pepecash on http://TuxExchange.com or on the DEX through RarePepeWallet.com
-
thanks nifty !
-
which upcoming changes are in plan for XCP?
-
It's all here:
Counterparty's Past & Future
Jan. 27, 2024
Adam Krellenstein returns to Counterparty after a 9-year hiatus. We dig into Counterparty's current and future state with one of its OG founders.
https://open.spotify.com/episode/6Z4WrP6PNXg7aPd0Alu3qj?si=u8zldYx0Q463C3k9tD3-xQ&nd=1&dlsi=419a32bcb88448a1 -
the floor i see is 0.0002 per xcp
-
Funky 😅
I’m generally in favor of transparent public markets rather than dark pools:
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/050614/introduction-dark-pools.aspAn Introduction to Dark PoolsDark pools are private exchanges for trading securities that are not accessible by the investing public.
-
*autist
How close am I? -
-
Sipping wine so apologies for the directness of my comment here.......
I was just about to say, "one day a whale is going to come in here and empty all the verified dispensers"
But then I realized
That would be more like a
"Rainbow trout"
or
"Black bass"
There is not enough XCP in there to feed even a baby whale..... -
The storm is coming.........
-
-
-
-
I wonder how many 2000 XCP batches he would make available and at what price?
Love the detective novel angle...... -
-
Honestly I don't know much about dark pools or trust them — I've always traded in transparent markets.
-
i know what you mean, but isn't it opposite of what bitcoin should be for? isnt the movent just because we dont want to trust anyone? i can not believe that in 2024 we still need to trust someone
-
we can easily use multisig on trades , no?
-
presented in 2010 if im not mistaken
-
14 years ago it were solutions already
-
and we still need to trust Joe from who knows where
-
just my two satoshi
-
if there is no solutions of how to trade - better is not to trade.
-
no brainer.
-
and you still have to trust someone to use it
-
thats where im coming from
-
lol
-
sure sure
-
orders can be rugged
-
dispensers too
-
wallet also
-
we have where to improve believe me
-
they can lol
-
they just built with mistakes
-
and it is normal to make mistakes, we live and learn.
-
ok then what about disclaimer ?
-
write this in front of my eyes when buying
-
"dont trust what you see until you know the anon you are buying from"
-
blockchain?
-
or website?
-
indexed where?
-
i bet we have to go somewhere to see them
-
there are some crucial mistakes that can be fixed
-
i know i was testing orders
-
to find out that after 80 blocks (if im not mistaken) it went expire
-
and jumped to the second buyer in a row
-
making my btc to vanish
-
its a huge nonsense making my payment to expire
-
such thing should not exist. after the node see the tx it has to be rserved UNTIL IT DROPS OR CONFIRMS
-
one of two
-
if the seller cant wait. he can spend the btc
-
making CPFP
-
but to leave gap to make a btc loss is nonsense
-
im not paid for doing that
-
also i dont see any bounty campaigns
-
so ?
-
you have to understand that what you ask is labor
-
lol
-
thats called a job man
-
what does surprice you of saying that i will not spend my time on something for free?
-
at least i dont ask donations before any improvements
-
i also gave you a hint:
-
multisignatures
-
my perspective is:
i would pay 0.0001 to open dispenser just later to find out that it is not trusted just because people are refered to some third party verification list? -
do we need that?
-
there is no need of such things.
-
i was not texting to you at all lol
-
-
what i am saying you should better focus on finding a solution that we could buy without in need to trust someone. thanks
-
BTC_pay if broadcasted should never ever expire
-
thats like first error you should go fixing . and it would be the best fix in last 5 years
-
show me a single merchant that would let your payment to expire if paid more than mempool everage fee and being cought by the nodes
-
show me a single other example.
-
all someone would need to lose btc when broadcasting btc_pay nowadays is for the network fees to surge and keep there for 80 blocks(could be more or less, cant remember exact number)
-
who have set the tx to expire and what was the reason for that? like what normal answer would come of why someone did that?
-
How does TZORP tie in with XCP? 🤔
-
Lmao welcome to Stack
-
I don’t think it does. It did at the beginning from what I’ve read.
-
Stack has no chill, he just randomly goes on rampages
-
Does he code?
-
Ya it’s def not a good look lol
-
I’m personally fine with either option, but how would we determine whether it should be done? From what I’ve seen consensus is whatever the people with power on the GitHub decide
-
I don’t mean to convey any negative connotation with that comment. Just wondering what options there are for determining changes
-
I have attached a screenshot from the original Bitcoin Whitepaper.
-
The following phrase is from the abstract of the bitcoin whitepaper on the first page:
"the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending."
Satoshi Nakamoto placed this here at a key cornerstone of the bitcoin project for a reason.
It is uncomfortable to accept this reality, but we cannot solve a problem if we first do not face the reality that the problem exists. -
Official Counterparty Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 Feb 2024 (45)
- 02 Feb 2024 (57)
- 03 Feb 2024 (40)
- 04 Feb 2024 (11)
- 05 Feb 2024 (7)
- 06 Feb 2024 (7)
- 07 Feb 2024 (2)
- 08 Feb 2024 (25)
- 09 Feb 2024 (30)
- 10 Feb 2024 (12)
- 11 Feb 2024 (66)
- 12 Feb 2024 (132)
- 13 Feb 2024 (76)
- 14 Feb 2024 (252)
- 15 Feb 2024 (67)
- 16 Feb 2024 (29)
- 17 Feb 2024 (40)
- 18 Feb 2024 (35)
- 19 Feb 2024 (27)
- 20 Feb 2024 (36)
- 21 Feb 2024 (56)
- 22 Feb 2024 (53)
- 23 Feb 2024 (196)
- 24 Feb 2024 (216)
- 25 Feb 2024 (14)
- 26 Feb 2024 (26)
- 27 Feb 2024 (8)
- 28 Feb 2024 (19)
- 29 Feb 2024 (358)