- 11 January 2024 (1340 messages)
-
not buliding on xcp you are a parasite attached to a host -
If we want to say they hacked CP in a way that didn’t help anyone else but them after arriving, I’ll buy that -
-
They are full supported ser in the new indexer -
devs have already said they arent using the protocol as intended
-
shitting in the sink
-
clean up on aisle 4
-
xchain down? -
-
xchain & fw down until sink it cleaned
-
If u wanna say I'm in favour of fee when jdog was active but now jump ship I buy that also -
-
Shit in the sink and find out
-
Which sink? Kitchen or bathroom
-
Shit around and find out
-
Anyway, where is the notification for for post office coin updates
-
Dm
-
No sink discrimination, take ur pick
-
The analogy isn't a postage stamp. Its an ink blotter stamp as we are "stamping" on the blockchain.
-
Not interested, only want to fill my bags with postoffice coin
-
Counterparty needs a bidet
-
not sure that's true though, we have more CP tools than before and more activity. -
-
too long... don't think you can do above 5 characters
-
it's live
-
ohhh
-
jk
-
they should really throw an error
-
I heard this may change
-
they do
-
Soon postoffice coin
-
I heard it too and I don't like it. I've told devs its not a good idea. But hey... I'm not in charge
-
I was against emojis too. Should have stuck with letters only like the stock market.
-
Opens too many vulnerabilities with all these characters
-
Thank you for your answer, I can see why the hars against stamps. Even do I been here not long but there years... I didnt feel that way. I felt that It was a New thing to create on the protocol.
And as I said there IS one way to create art stamps completly away from CP. But Im not that supportive there because I want Stamps to benefit the whole ecosystem. -
Not right now lol, I have the least tooling ever
-
-
-
lol, we were at Christmas last year staying at my rich sisters house and everyone said that was me
-
I can picture that actually
-
Hahaha
-
I just wanted my green banner... thats all.
I was so close
And now....
Just... -
XCP is just a token - ok its Couterparty native token n has special uses - but its just a token ... its Counterparty i love -
two questions regarding XCP i don`t understand pretty well, who is the owner of XCP token and why is it not locked?
-
no one owns it - its was proof of burn and the burn ended at a preset block height, no counterpart lock needed
-
its forever deflationary
-
not actually true, there is a wallet in the owner section
-
ahh TIL
-
is not locked
-
so the owner actually can print more
-
the one with no keys?
-
no need as you cant burn btc any more for it - except on testnet
-
is possible idk want to understand
-
if you send btc to 1Counterpartyxxxxx you dont get xcp in return
-
₿ was sent to provable burn addy in return for xcp token
-
₿ forever gone token forever locked
-
with this fork, is double spending still possible or this was the reason behind the fork? -
yes this part is completely understanded
-
1CounterpartyXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXUWLpVr
-
this was the address where funds was sent
-
yes
-
what i dont understand is why is not locked
-
i guess as it was not known at the time of creation how much would be issued
-
and no need if you cant get any more
-
okey
-
thats my understanding
-
Send here xcp for postoffice coin?
-
yeah i think so
-
send rarepepe here for entrance to valhalla
-
-
If you want you can open some dex for this one for some rarepepes A6524912715479370914
-
-
I will study offers
-
our dex is down
-
thanks guys
-
-
Too much shit in the sink
-
Happy new year
-
wen shitterfull token
-
will not use inferior chinese stamp wallets
-
we dont do that in America
-
-
-
just xchain is down ser not the dex
-
-
-
-
POLL RESULTS
XCP Fee on Numerics?
---
55% = Yes, 0.25 XCP
16% = Yes, 0.5 XCP
10% = Yes, Discuss
19% = No
XCP Fee on Numerics (YES/NO)
---
81% = YES
19% = No
What Should Fee Be?
---
55% = 0.25 XCP
16% = 0.50 XCP
10% = OTHER
Activation Block
---
790,000 = Current block
+ 1008 = 144 blocks per day x 7 days
---
791,008 = Activation Block
It appears that general consensus is to institute an 0.25 XCP Fee on Numerics at block 791,008.
@hodlencoinfield Agreed? -
Can you stop posting this again and again
-
lol.
how many people participated in the poll?
3 or 1204 -
current maintainer voted for numeric fee
-
id presume a new consensus method and vote for changes to counterparty would be held since a new group of maintainers/developers is now working -
well considering fw is down not sure how we can vote with xcp lol
-
-
did I ever say a vote with xcp in my statement?
-
I heard xcp
-
-
I mean postoffice coin
-
Is xchain servers down right now or they are running on another net? -
you guys don't have your own carrier pigeons?
-
I hab only firearm carrier as a pigeon, but I guess hab to get another one for financial chit chatting
-
finding consensus is the overarching issue that started this entire chain of events from 9 months ago -
that's why we are here in this situation today
-
I know it sucks... its an unfortunate side-effect... IF/WHEN I bring XChain back up, I will do everything within my power to make sure NAMED assets and SUBASSETS appear on xchain... still got the issue of spamming txs causing lagging... so, only way to keep xchain up is to ignore those fucking "FREE" numerics for now... I updated counterparty2mysql to solve this issue (For XChain, Spells of Genesis, and other projects) by a quick hack to ignore all numerics.... IF/WHEN I bring XChain back up, i'll prolly need update this filter a bit to check if the numeric is actually a subasset. https://github.com/jdogresorg/counterparty2mysql/commit/77c6274e05448aae6eec46343baa8f20fe730a95added optional numeric asset filter · jdogresorg/counterparty2mysql@77c6274PHP script that populates a MySQL database with Counterparty data - added optional numeric asset filter · jdogresorg/counterparty2mysql@77c6274
-
Thanks bro stay tough we are with you
-
-
-
I was talking about stamps not xchain 👍
-
got it... muh bad 🤷️️️️️️
-
Emblem Vault (@EmblemVault) on X
https://t.co/al4nZOnlnS
-
What is current state of xchain and freewallet, is it usable for sending NAMED assets and btc? @jdogresorg
-
-
It’s not just a token, it’s a token that even the founders had to pay their fair share to be included.
The founders and everyone else burning their own Bitcoin so everyone was treated equally.
It’s the epitome of what Bitcoin and blockchain was to stand for. Fair and equal to everyone. -
Bro... they don't care.
-
The selflessness of the founders is incredible. They could have easily filled their pockets.
-
An immaculate conception via sacrifice that can never be replicated
-
Only now, please send xcp for postoffice coin
-
OK it's a special token .. I love it
-
love or in love -
Makes love
-
And creates baby postoffice coins
-
it's all coming together
-
-
-
I not even minted a sr20 let alone deployed one .. I know the terminology but is about it
-
to busy building for the DeX
-
Xcp is postoffice coin
-
-
stamps guys got quiet I guess they are finally doing some dev work since all that free stuff doesnt work now 😂
-
It was about time, In 30mins we back dont worry! We want to make your evening fun!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Now you’re getting somewhere pappy -
But you lol when I say it to Mike
-
Change api’s and yes
-
Thats the joke
-
I've always said this. its chess not checkers
-
-
-
Artwork for FORKOFF.WAR ... design by talented artist LycosFreak 🤷️️️️
-
-
Training Day - King Kong
King Kong ain't got shit on me! ------------------------------------------ You disloyal fool-ass bitch made punk! JAKE! I NEED MA MONEY! JAKE! Aww you motherfuckers. OK. Alright. I'm puttin' cases on all you bitches. Huh? You think you can do this shit..JAKE! You think you can do this to ME? You motherfuckers will be playin' basketball in Pelican Bay when I get finished wichu! SHU program nigga! 23 hour lockdown! I'm the man up in this piece! You'll never see the light of da..who the fuck d'ya think you fuckin' with? I'm the police! I run shit here, you just live here! Yeah that's right you better walk away! Go on walk away coz Ima burn this motherfucker down. King Kong ain't got SHIT on me! That's alright. That's alright. Yeah, I don't g'fuck. I'm winnin' anyway. I'm winnin'. I'm winnin' any mo'fuckin' way, I can' lose. Yeah you can shoot me, but you can't kill me. Yeah. Aww what a day. What a mo'fuckin' day.
-
-
we said fork the fed guys, not counterparty..🥴 -
Haha made me laugh again
-
-
-
-
-
-
stamps guys were here? wtaf
-
I dont follow. You lol, why? I ask for your benefit if you’ll bite.
-
How is posting memes right now in the communities best interest? Wow maybe counterparty needs to die
-
There are devs working in other chats. Dont worry community.
-
-
haha damn beat me to it
-
This is a great meme for the situation
-
I agree, and that’s why I have so much respect for Jdog. He did exactly that. I’m glad we agree -
-
-
-
Exactly. Stamps and counterparty should quite obviously be two different protocols.
-
wen stamps fork
-
Is this a gif of cleaning shit out of the sink because - wow, appropriate
-
why?
-
Glad you notice! we put some Stamp papel to your mensajes! Your welcome! 💚
-
Because the tools and incentives built for XCP don’t work for stamps. And since stamps have contributed zero to the XCP ecosystem there is zero reason anyone in XCP land should try to accommodate them.
Larger issue - because XCP is a fairly useless token because it has flawed BTC maxi tokenomics built in there are few ways to “give back” as a new project. It’s clear that changes are needed and also that some XCP devs like XCP being legacy gimped and don’t want it to change.
Enjoy your counterparty classic -
I don’t think the xcp tx fee goes far enough, but at least it’s a start. I’m all for a complete retooling of what xcp means, including xcp staking and tx fees for *all* transfers (just higher ones for numeric assets), that rewards xcp holders with xcp - but at least we have taken the first step
-
Xcp’s current tokenomics are like someone *wanted* there to be a tragedy of the commons and built specifically for it. A protocol’s existence shouldn’t be predicated on benevolence.
-
Well have New wallets interested, we have bring more users to freewallet and Xchain than in the last 5 years altogether (Im pretty sure...) Because CP appeared in Major media after years with some minor news? I cant really understand why users IS a bad thing in your eyes.
-
Also New devs teams interested in decentralize the protocol and expand the tools
-
Because, xcp in its current form does not incentivize new users or new projects - as I have stated
-
-
Interested in spamming the protocol into unusability, extracting maximum profit, and moving on in six months. Ftfy
-
-
You are the same crypto bros that created eternal September of 2017 with your nonsense
-
ya we've been waiting for them, they are finally here, they will lose and go onto the next grift
-
thanks for playing
-
-
Not sure if its a fishbowl mentality or if its something else. The only reason I can understand IS the one give by @XCERXCP today. And I can understand that, but if I where in this state of mind I would try to look for the opportunity here for everyone.
Even do I agree, still surprised that the main conversation here IS about the fee and not about decentralize the protocol and create new tools and improve old ones for the new times. How can that not be the main interest?
That said @pappyG45 I laught a lot with you keep It Up! -
I agree
-
-
-
The Stamp market where dead already si months and we are more now, dont buying that.
-
Which one of you is vorhees btw. Take a break from your happily ever after and private island and help fix this shit please. This is partly your mess.
-
Im sorry you didnt got into punks
-
Sorry, let me rephrase. We could use a hand
-
You said that you dont want us before haha
-
Yes toxic BTC maxi philosophy cost me infinite gains on 55 cent ethereum and every project that came on it in the first years. Thankfully rare pepes have changed my life multiple times enough to make up for it
-
principles don't come cheap
-
But see, crucially, Ethereum has done a million sketchy and stupid things that have violated their social contract ten times over - but fundamentally *they incentivize their token holders*
-
And as such they enjoy people happily building and maintaining the rails of Ethereum for free because it’s profitable to do so. No benevolence required
-
Also @jdogresorg if xchain ever needs funding I’m all for you literally making an xchain asset and selling it. Then wallets who hold x amount of xchain get increased functionality from the site, etc etc
-
xchainpepe so 201x
-
You are right, the thing IS that right now, there urge to build everything that mainly Jdog was asking for years.
After that IS the time to Talk about incentives... And here como the fees or the proposals you did. But without OS infra, all that plans Will fall apart for one single entity in any time In the future.
Not sure if in this chat we are capable of seen It, thats why dev teams are not here so often. -
But guess this chat IS to Scream "can the devs do this and not that?"
-
J-Dog (@jdogresorg) on X
How did you determine consensus? Using what method? A few relatively new/loud devs talk louder and make big promises, so the needs of their project outweigh the needs of all the many users of Counterparty?!? 🤮 @CounterpartyXCP @FreeWallet @XChain_io @mikeinspace @Stampchain
-
Break the infastructure, but let us build, then we will be reasonable and talk about "responsible" usage of Counterparty.... "Hey, These BTNS broadcasts seem to be a problem now, not numerics, lets put a fee on those instead of numerics"
-
-
But you know that the issue is the DB, and before the fork there were starting the conversations.
They should have been before, 100% but this is where we are now. -
-
Also that you had a lot on your shoulders for years.
-
Can't wait for the next 10k pfp project on postoffice coin
-
pretty sure upgrades to xchain were on the table for over two years
-
and the community even thought they donated to pay for those types of improvements
-
how do we know that this remains an official channel with the new maintainers, maybe they are focused where the most potential eyes are?
-
Yess, Ive seen many CIPs for ideas we are discussing now. But as @katiecharm said there werent the incentives to be fully on them.
-
That desire to keep xcp broken and outdated out of some weird sense of staying 'cool' and 'og weird' is what bothers me the most, frankly. Ive seen it first hand. -
How do we come together and aling, thats the Rarepepe question.
-
I did upgrade xchain and counterparty over the years.... to be clear, community raised $600k 3 years ago (even Adam donated), and I am greatly appreciative... I said I would do dev for 3 years, and I have... unfortunately, the market tanked, that $600k became $200k almost overnight.... so the funds the community donated were used up in the first year.... I let everyone know this, but I stuck around, keeping my word, pushing CP forward... and on my own dime the past 2 years ($200k year costs x 2 years = $400k).... so YEAH, this sucks... but i've stuck my by word, worked on Counterparty full-time the full 3 years, and funded it to the tune of $400K out of my own pocket..... all while being abused, told I am over-reacting about things failing.... I screamed for dev support for years and more wallets/explorers.... YES, I put myself on this cross, and agreed to bear it for 3 years, I stuck to my word, and just took the beating and kept counterparty alive all this time.... But I reached my breaking point, and I am DONE playing nice... short of playing chicken with a $1 Billion dollar ledger again (no one wants another fork), I am done asking nicely, and I am speaking my mind in an unfiltered way.
-
The Clash - Should I Stay or Should I Go (Official Video)
Official Video for "Should I Stay or Should I Go" by The Clash Listen to The Clash: https://TheClash.lnk.to/listenYD Subscribe to The Clash YouTube Channel: https://TheClash.lnk.to/subscribeYD WATCH LONDON CALLING: https://theclash.lnk.to/LondonCallingVideo WATCH ROCK THE CASBAH: https://theclash.lnk.to/RockTheCasbahVideo WATCH TOMMY GUN: https://theclash.lnk.to/TommyGunVideo WATCH THERE MUST BE AN ANGEL: https://theclash.lnk.to/BankrobberVideo Follow The Clash: Facebook: https://TheClash.lnk.to/followFI Instagram: https://TheClash.lnk.to/followII Twitter: https://TheClash.lnk.to/followTI Website: https://TheClash.lnk.to/followWI Spotify: https://TheClash.lnk.to/followSI YouTube: https://TheClash.lnk.to/subscribeYD Lyrics: [Intro] Oh! Hola! [Verse 1] Darling, you got to let me know Should I stay or should I go? If you say that you are mine I'll be here 'till the end of time So you got to let me know Should I stay or should I go? [Verse 2] It's always tease, tease, tease You're happy when I'm on my knees One day it's fine and next it's black So if you want me off your back Well, come on and let me know Should I stay or should I go? [Chorus] Should I stay or should I go now? Should I stay or should I go now? If I go, there will be trouble And if I stay it will be double So come on and let me know [Verse 3] This indecision's bugging me (Esta indecisión me molesta) If you don't want me, set me free (Si no me quieres, librarme) Exactly whom I'm supposed to be (Dígame que tengo ser) Don't you know which clothes even fit me? (Sabes que ropa me "quedrá"?) Come on and let me know (Me tienes que decir) Should I cool it or should I blow? (Me debo ir o quedarme?) Split [Chorus] Should I stay or should I go now? (Yo me enfrío o lo soplo) Should I stay or should I go now? (Yo me enfrío o lo soplo) If I go there will be trouble (Si me voy va a haber peligro) And if I stay it will be double (Si me quedo sera el doble) So ya gotta let me know (Me tienes que decir) Should I cool it or should I blow? (Tengo frío por los ojos) Should I stay or should I go now? (Tengo frío por los ojos) If I go there will be trouble (Si me voy va haber peligro) And if I stay it will be double (Si me quedo será el doble) So ya gotta let me know (Me tienes que decir) Should I stay or should I go? #TheClash #ShouldIStayOrShouldIGo #CombatRock #Paramount #SexyBeast
-
Gloria Gaynor - I Will Survive
Gloria Gaynor's official music video for "I Will Survive" from the album, Love Tracks. REMASTERED IN HD! Listen to more Classic 70's & 80's Dance Hits: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dYWe1c3OyU&list=PLjF50Dlp9iena8krL6H64mfsS7cbIWv6f Follow Gloria Gaynor: Facebook: https://facebook.com/GloriaGaynor Instagram: https://instagram.com/gloriagaynor Twitter: https://twitter.com/gloriagaynor Website: https://gloriagaynor.com #GloriaGaynor #IWillSurvive #Remastered
-
Listen to the lyrics of both songs.... particularly true in this historic moment (historic for me at least)
-
Done taking shit, done playing nice.... some call me crazy and rogue... buckle up ppl... gonna be a fun 2024
-
You just answered a question with a question, and you presumed I stated a fact when I proposed a question.
-
everyone has a plan until they run up against toxic bitcoin maximlaists 😂
-
Since Counterwallet is the official, are those servers up? Sure doesn't look like it. Who controls those?
-
-
Nope, I asked a question, people were assuming this would remain an official channel of communication, I pointed out that assumption might be incorrect.
-
nope, they been down for over a month... Javier and I identified the issue, submitted pull 3 pull requests with 2 different possible fixes.... the core devs have failed to move any of those updates forward, or really have much discussion on which solution to take... doesn't seem like a priority for them 🤷️️️️
-
Weeks ago you said you'd have them back up in a week IIRC. Sounds like a malicious move to purposefully pre-nerf the community before this created fiasco.
-
-
where are the devs?
-
"Should I stat or should I got now? If I go, there will be trouble, and if I stat It will be double" WoW, good taste bdw.
-
-
-
devs hard at work lolz
-
-
-
-
We noticed.
-
Limited cooperation.
-
Also XCP fees for anything do not directly correlate to supporting any infrastructure without pumping someones personal bag in the process. Misdirection, wrong issue.
-
LOL... if I force a fix, I am a evil dictator... so I wrote code, suggest the solutions, and wait for the other core devs to push forwrad a change... done being attacked.... not my fault that they didn't make getting counterwallet back up again a priority.... Not every problem in CP is mine to solve anymore.... can't have it both ways 🤷️️️️
-
Wallet updated for donations by default.
-
I never spoke of fees
-
counterwallet was a dumpster fire and should just be scrapped
-
They had to vacate to the mountain tops to get away from the forum sliders and near sighted.
-
I have asked before months ago but it went unanswered, is there an official xchain chat?
-
-
I dont want the support cost... ppl figure it out or they dont
-
DYOR
-
-
Previous similar rushed ‘updates’ broke it.
-
Previous updates broke it.
-
-
its really sad to see devs to cuck to shitcoiners while breaking their own system.
DO YOUR JOB -
-
protect the network
-
Not intended for your consumption. For the rest of the class. I’m w you.
-
You’re missing the point of counterwallet
-
https://x.com/dujunx/status/1745362731027562552?s=46&t=PwOWWcvWxy8EWRXm4n7Axg
Former Huobi exchange founder Du Jun is looking for Bitcoin L2 projects and development teams and providing $50 million in financial support. Can Counterparty and BTNS get in touch?Du Jun (@DujunX) on X准备深度参与比特币生态建设 优选赛道：Layer2 自带 5000 万美元 求大神组队。 项目上线之日，我会公布5000 万 U 或等值比特币地址，专供此项目发展使用。
-
-
-
If it wasn’t a movie.. it just became a movie. Billy Mitchell ain’t got nothing on this. -
-
-
All good and all but how will you sell them? -
Dispenser double spends, xcp entirely iliquid. No stablecoin support. I had a long list of improvements that could be made to improve ux, but ive forgotten now.
Anyway, this shake up was needed long ago and Im here for it. -
Sounds like it’s an abandoned blockchain ready to be taken over with new devs tbh. Yeah the desire to keep things broken isn’t attractive - it’s time for XCP to move into the 2020’s.
-
It sucks that the way to make XCP most usable these days is use a centralized third party (coval) to vault an XCP token and create a representative token on Ethereum.
In a world where XCP was a desirable token that you could stake for tx fee rewards, that wouldn’t happen as much - people wouldn’t immediately take their XCP assets and run to Ethereum with them. Or at least it wouldn’t be quite so tempting. -
is xchain broken error 1016 -
-
-
and to restate the central thesis, BTC maxis tends to make fun projects that have atrocious tokenomics and no real ability to self sustain through an economy because they don’t want to dare challenge their own bags, as if it’s some sort of sacred commandment.
Meanwhile others who aren’t beholden to that nonsense happily innovate away. Maybe classic XCP and an “XCP++” could coexist. Perhaps the old XCP addresses would work similarly with the same token, would just have a small tx fee attached.
Meanwhile XCP++ assets would do things dramatically differently. For one, it would be a brand new name space, and now named assets would be rented for a certain number of blocks by spending XCP. No more asset name squating. Maybe ALL assets begin life as a numeric asset and then can register a chain name. Also XCP++ would distribute tx fees to XCP nodes who staked a moderate amount of the token. Now XCP has self-sustaining value. People want the token, and there is a real cost to spending it or abusing it.
With XCP master nodes earning XCP from asset creation, tx sends, and name registrations there’s a lot of good reasons to hodl XCP.
If we want to get really advanced, XCP++ could even run a side chain that users could store to create a cheap database of nft headers and data, all secured by the BTC blockchain without every detail of a dog jpeg needing to be on the bitcoin blockchain. That’s the most elegant solution and one that should honestly make BTC core devs happy -
It lead the masses in a new direction, with an original concept, launched in a fair way, by true coders, and didn’t chase $$$ or do scammy shit to stay relevant…. ETH, shitcoin, pump n dump…. It stayed the course, didn’t pivot, and had proved its true value, as has Bitcoin.
Now it’s time for growth!
Counterparty has entered the end of the beginning🚀 -
This is just a dream sheet however, but I think it would be a damn cool dream to have. with that feature set XCP would honestly be competitive with Eth nfts and dumbass ordinals
-
-
lol okay what can i use instead
-
the man behin teh curtain reveals himself? -
sounds like a fork
-
can we add royalties and a buy/sell tax too?
-
for wanting to avoid shitcoinomics it sure sounds like a lot of shitcoin tech requests tbh
-
-
Wait until post office coin reaches full potential
-
The goal would not be to be Turing complete - not trying to compete with Ethereum, and that’s a feature tbh. A limited feature set means limited possible exploits. A way to create and transact semi-fungible assets that incentivizes itself and sustains itself / because otherwise the project will fall to the tragedy of the commons. Look at the many projects that shared that exact fate because there was no compelling reason for anyone to care about them
-
So no, no one’s suggesting enabling shib like shitcoins on xcp.
-
No, you are talking about forking xcp and making that a flavor of the week shitcoin
-
Now imagine a world where xcp had these tokenomics form the beginning and xcp was worth $760 each in 2023, with new asset launches being a big deal and stakers being very proud of their investments. People deploy their nft projects on xcp because they want to be able to transact in the xcp dex and earn some of it
-
And you want to leave it in it’s broken state that cannot even manage to avoid being forked due to core devs not caring enough to stop a protocol killing abuse
-
Self sustaining economic systems must be self sustaining. Do you think Bitcoin miners should be rewarded with bitcoins?
-
Does that make Bitcoin a shitcoin?
-
No ma'am, I simply want to let the smoke clear, and assess a solution to getting all users back onto base functionality. THEN we can find a way to have a consensus, THEN we can add features if they reach that consensus
-
An XCP dex is pointless if you lack any economic incentives for anyone to give a shit about XCP.
-
Take a little time to step back and breathe, dont change the whole recipie of something that worked for a decade
-
The high courts of nations dont kneejerk, why should little 'ol us?
-
It did not work. And if some of the earliest nfts weren’t unfortunately on that protocol, it would have long died and gone the way other abandonware blockchains.
-
It has limped along purely due to historic value
-
hard disagree
-
And I think a good solution locks in that historic value but also offers a way to incentivize people to build something new
-
What important projects were launched in XCP between 2018 and 2023
-
Don’t worry, I’ll wait
-
Fake rares
-
that one doesnt count as important
-
Touche, one decent salmon swimming upstream against terrible economic forces
-
Bitcorns
-
XCP luddites need to think long and hard about both *why* people want ETH but don’t care or want XCP, and also *the consequences* of no one wanting or valuing XCP.
Would XCP exist if every XCP node turned off due to lack of interest? Would XCP exist due to every block explorer shutting down due to no economic incentive? Would XCP exist if devs weren’t around to fix bugs and create new versions? Of course not.
Why do you think the current XCP devs could care less about it? Because the token has no chance to be worth anything because terrible parameters never gave it a chance.
People care about things that are valuable. XCP must be valuable if XCP is to survive twenty more years. -
Missing the point entirely
-
Why did xcp get delisted
-
Why do people want to vault to “shitcoin land”
-
Because those things incentivize their holders, generate volume, and sustain value.
-
XCP Luddites want to absolutely strip a token of any desirability and then make a pikachu face when the ecosystem collapses because no one wants the token
-
Anyway, looks like xchain is currently down due to a 1206 error. This means rpw.wtf is also down since it depends on it. Wondering if I can still send XCP assets with free wallet
-
Yeah seems freewallet isn’t working either
-
Unlikely. More likely stamps breaks and destroys what little infrastructure there is - then moves on to the next thing once they’ve fully destroyed what’s left of xcp
-
Since stamps are so lucrative I’m looking forward to all the stamp chain tools and explorers
-
Since stamps are so lucrative, everyone will happily use the stamp fork and the tools that come with it, and any other XCP implementation will die off.
-
Maybe you should go make a PowerPoint slide presentation about it with some star wipes and call it your whitepaper.
-
Sorry, wipe paper
-
Well currently thanks to stamps and their fuckery I can’t send any rare pepes tonight which is causing me actual material loss. Happy to continue to support any protocol changes that prevent xcp from grinding to a halt once more and protects accessibility to some of humanity’s oldest nfts
-
MaFiA wArZ -
Fake Rares, Dank Rares, Fake Commons, Rareland, TheWojakWay, RareCoco (and way more I'm forgetting) -
I never collected them, didn't dig into them
-
Check dm
-
rarepepewallet.com is up -
Thank you, will try
-
Haha, so it turns out that emblem curated vaults depend on xchain as well - and so no one can vault a rare Pepe while xchain is down
-
Did we get rugged then? -
Did the fork happen already or why is it all down,I was just reading he left a 30 day window,or has that passed?
-
the fork got cancelled
-
nobody is rugged. come back monday and things will probably be working. this is growing pains
-
There is no fork anymore, xchain is down so is freewallet. Counterparty protocol, THE FROGS, are chilling
-
Cope harder! kek -
Fix it
-
This is all over a .1 xcp charge? Hilarious
-
So stupid
-
THE FROGS ARE CHILLING #facts
-
compare that to the wallet donations and its peanuts
-
this is not over a fee. this is over the inability of devs to determine consensus
or better yet, communicate what they constitute is consensus to the community -
You’re a bit behind. The 30 day window changed to a few blocks windows after a few minutes notice.
-
definately agree dont let the new people vote. just any people would be fine
-
I understand the depths this really goes but was sparked by a .1 fee.
-
I just find it very time stampable. Wen I can create a token again. lol
-
So great. @jdogresorg is a legend.
-
Anyone else have dns issues with freewallet and xchain? -
Read above. 👆Way above
-
its stampchain now
-
Inshallah
-
Which means a hostile fork might be honestly needed then.
-
That’s what happens when devs can’t decide consensus - hence Ethereum classic, etc
-
It never was about a fee. Xchain could not keep up with the protocol.
A fee would have still left the real performance issues.
It is not a protocol problem as proven with the fact that rarepepewallet.com is up and other explorers function. -
It’s madness that a database optimisation problem is causing so many issues
-
it wasnt
-
lol
-
simp view
-
but expect nothing less
-
Toxic shit
-
Suspect or ironic that the BTC replacement for the stock market gets taken down the day theBTC etf’s launch?
-
Sounds like, to me, some of these people bleeding counterparty of value, need to put a whole bunch of it back in. Then everyone would shut up. You know who your are -
but that was their main goal
-
They will lose eventually
-
they thought she would never lose
now they all lose -
They would all win if they worked together and merged or fell in line with the protocol.
-
what profound egotistical stupidity is this
-
The majority = the horde of new stamp users?
-
Good job; now xcp is pretty much unusable for the most part. Shows just how rekt the entire protocol would be without the evil jdog you people are screeching against
-
ya all the devs are betas lol
-
The truth Karen. Cope
-
too much soy
-
You’re gonna eat those words.
-
Can't do anything. XCP is largely useless at the moment because the entire ecosystem depended on the work of the person you idiots wanted gone.
-
Stop trying to slide the topic. Got anything constructive to bring to the table?
-
I think with majority he refers the active devs
-
nobody wanted a person gone, they disagreed with their actions
-
The active devs who haven't done a damn thing for 9 months? When was the last actual dev work done by them?
-
Because you dont take it seriously enough to know how to change api or run your own node.
-
what have you done?
-
asking from honesty
-
don't know you
-
Big words from someone who can't even prove they own those stamps they shill so endlessly.
-
I've done as much as the XCP core devs have in 2023, for one.
-
We are about neck and neck on commits
-
You have been developing?
-
I’m not shilling anything. I’m trying to drag a bunch of degenerates towards the light about the potential of this dumpster fire of a protocol.
-
The core devs have not.
-
But what have you done?
-
u dont seem to be doing much of anything? are you maintainer?
-
Stamp liquidity provider - very important work
-
does he speak for the devs? lol
-
he seems to love stamps
-
pfft lol
-
No, one toxic trait from the stamp people are to come in here and speak with faux authority as if they speak for the protocol, when most of them have never touched it before 2023
-
You don’t bring anything of substance to the conversation. I do.
-
Counterparty is bulletproof.
-
-
Sorry I meant what have you been been developing on counterparty
-
sounds like j dog will decide what happens to us all then
-
fair enough
-
spicey!
-
The active dev for 8 of the last 9 months has been Jdog uniquely
-
-
-
-
-
-
... versus....
-
-
Good job celebrating losing the person who was actually doing the work.
-
But they are not active devs, are you implying that people need to code for what reason?
-
Are you implying that someone should exert authority over a protocol while not contributing to it?
-
I don't celebrate, neither wanted this to happen, but you are putting the focus in the wrong things imho
-
In that case I'm king of XCP.
-
Jdog stepped out a month ago
-
And the stamp people definitely should get their way
-
himself
-
because of the very same hostile attitude you are presenting:
-
open protocol you cant decide sorry
-
you literally highlighted a dead dev to prove your point
-
Pilot is a troll and he doesn't know
-
what hostile attitude? I cannot have more respect for Jdog for the last 3 years I have been here
-
"nothing should change" "no one should care about the dev doing the work" " the only working block explorer doesn't matter" "lets shit up the protocol and wreck it" ..... yeah I'd get exhausted too
-
but haven't seen you even once until your AI pepe got visibility again, with all the respect
-
maybe I'm wrong
-
again, waiting on you to prove you own any stamps, but you can't right now can you
-
yes i can :)
-
-
what do you mean? there are two explorers working right now
-
or that
-
cp still working
-
just one explorer is down
-
what would you like me to sign from this address?
-
He was tinkering with what was already there.
-
-
Stop showing selective graphs and propaganda
-
github defaults to commits in the last 12 months - take it up with git
-
-
Idgaf
-
only jdog and javier have been building, only two active developers
-
okay karen, maybe you can talk to the manager of counterparty about it
-
I made a whole collection of 600 karen stamps, in case you want to collect
-
The Pixel Karens
THEY WANT TO SPEAK TO THE MANAGER.
-
others might try to argue that xcp is perfect and even though one project can spam it into unusability it needs no changes ever and should never be touched - even when it's unusable
-
needs one for sure
-
xcp is not perfect
-
xcp has an obvious lack of resources and developers, but reality has been what has been
-
Idgaf about your github issues, Karen.
-
least triggered stamp bag holder
-
A protocol should not need development. Seal it and leave it.
-
You glow
-
good god please eat less paint and stop spending so much time on 4chan
-
Protocols need development; you just happen to be against it because the current one contains a flaw that allows you to destroy it for profit.
-
You cant speak for me.
-
Imagine if ETH had never developed itself after 2017? Imagine if Bitcoin had never made any changes? Are you literally 15 years old?
-
You're just speaking nonsense now.
-
But what you are not understanding is that counterparty was not the problem
-
counterparty works fine
-
-
ETH lol
-
if changes want to be made, can be made
-
but protocol hasn't failed, or nodes stopped working
Official Counterparty Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 Jan 2024 (25)
- 02 Jan 2024 (17)
- 03 Jan 2024 (32)
- 04 Jan 2024 (83)
- 05 Jan 2024 (37)
- 06 Jan 2024 (24)
- 07 Jan 2024 (603)
- 08 Jan 2024 (1209)
- 09 Jan 2024 (709)
- 10 Jan 2024 (609)
- 11 Jan 2024 (1340)
- 12 Jan 2024 (807)
- 13 Jan 2024 (482)
- 14 Jan 2024 (370)
- 15 Jan 2024 (686)
- 16 Jan 2024 (333)
- 17 Jan 2024 (54)
- 18 Jan 2024 (38)
- 19 Jan 2024 (197)
- 20 Jan 2024 (107)
- 21 Jan 2024 (26)
- 22 Jan 2024 (28)
- 23 Jan 2024 (100)
- 24 Jan 2024 (57)
- 25 Jan 2024 (65)
- 26 Jan 2024 (32)
- 27 Jan 2024 (11)
- 28 Jan 2024 (40)
- 29 Jan 2024 (61)
- 30 Jan 2024 (62)
- 31 Jan 2024 (35)