- 24 November 2020 (78 messages)
-
I'm looking to make CP the place to put all projects
-
Number go up
-
-
mrcDYzx5khGWViroP9E2v9hUWjoK6SzVqU I can't get the correct BTC balance In the [get_chain_address_info] API after any send is done
-
-
I do not think so
-
For me, Max is a professional scammer, he cheated us all 1 year ago, and it was not the first time
-
use his twitter account and tv program, then enter the telegram groups and say any bullshit
-
Hi...any plan to get cp listed in exchange yet??
-
-
Need to pay listing fee. But who pays?
-
Hey, someone was listening the last 20 times I answered the "wen exchange" question 🙂
-
-
Make it a pinned post
-
Not worth it. I'm just one guy speaking my opinion... not speaking in any official capacity on this topic..... Exchanges can list XCP, we have made great efforts to make it much simpler for exchangse to integrate, including MPMA to help with exchange payout batching, etc..... At the end of the day, it is up to the exchanges if they want to list XCP... we get offers all the time to get listed, but almost all of them are PAID LISTINGS... ie, someone has to pay to get them on the exchange. My personal opinion is that we should spend funds on development and not on exchange listings. If someone wants to pay out of their own pocket for an exchange listing, cool... but that is not something I will focus my efforts or finances on. Counterparty runs perfectly fine without being on centralized exchanges. You only need XCP for registering assets really, and you can pay with things direclty using BTC on Counterparty, so XCP being on exchanges does nothing really more than pump the price...... So to me the "wen exchange" questions has been answered many many times, and is typically only asked by people who care about the price pumping and judge a coin based off that metric and not based off the actual usability of the platform
-
The value-add is a distributed exchange market. It's objectively a poor indicator of health to have few trading venues. A single market is almost unheard of - and it's even worse than if Zaif has truly disabled withdrawals. It's great that Counterparty has a native marketplace but ideally some decentralization among exchanges is par-for-the course.
-
-
Yes, we have had it since the beginning, and have revised it over the years to make exchange integration easier (memos in sends for tracking deposits directly to hotwallet instead of intermediate deposit address) and MPMA (to batch sending out of withdrawls
-
Exchange Integration | Counterparty
Developers/Notes_and_Tutorials/exchange_integration.md
-
👍
-
i.e. someone should totally do a better interface for dex trading like the raizer stuff but a little bit more open (this is NOT endorsement of raizer, i don't know about them)
-
-
-
i mean, the dex is there, operating 24/7
-
100%... we need a better web wallet and have for a while.. counterwallet is old/outdated
-
it's just a matter of doing a UI and promoting it
-
-
i would totally do it, but that's gonna be a steep price AND i'm better spending my time solving infrastructure and adding features than creating yet another wallet UI
-
raizer.cc... a Skin over the CP DEX... and they use a raizer.BTC token to get around the "using BTC on the DEX is a pain" issue... users can just swap BTC for RAIZER.BTC which they can then use on the DEX just like XCP or any other asset..... simple "fire-n-forget" DEX orders... place order and can walk away, no need to monitor for BTC order matches and send BTC payments, etc..... they basically just bypass using BTC on the DEX 🙂
-
I have not used their services nor reviewed their code... but they have been around for a while doing their own thing.... no one has screamed foul yet.
-
it's not a bad idea tho, and it's a business model which i applaud (but they have very high onboard-outboard fees)
-
-
just copy binance 🤣
-
We also had a company doing something similar when CP first started... swapping BTC for XBTC and then using that on the DEX instead of BTC..... that company closed down pretty quick tho once they figured out that they were an unlicensed money exchanger and would get in some serious trouble if they kept operating
-
😂
-
raizer has a pretty good ui imho.... again, not endorsement
-
-
100%... that is what I did with freewallet DEX interface... copied what people were already used to... Poloniex trading interface.... immitation is the highest form of flattery 🙂
-
-
❤️
-
so namely, we have 3 current ways to access the DEX that are imho awesome ways to trade XCP
-
it's just a matter of someone doing 1+1 and understanding how to couple the DEX with some liquidity
-
-
-
that's what i'm talking about
-
👍
-
it's like, the opportunity is there and you don't have to ask permission to do it
-
if ppl don't see that as an opportunity
-
i mean, i'm getting paid to enhance and add features to this awesome system, and no one is taking the opportunities
-
-
Raizer is beautiful design
-
Nice. That’s pretty awesome.
-
LOL
-
yeah we heard that i fully understand and i wanna help with that at some point
-
I really don't want anything to do with centralization but it helps the scalpers with liquidation lol
- 25 November 2020 (7 messages)
-
Thanks for confirming that Munehisa - No one likes dead horses :) And I don't want to push one particular view (centralized thought?) but rather invite a conversation. I much prefer Conterparty to all the cryptoart platforms and seek it's growth and proper recognition. I do help with the Bit20 index - an informational service - and it warmed my heart to see XCP in the genesis index.
-
That's the coolest thing. CP has tools like dispensers - helpful for everyday users who want to buy a chunk with ease.
-
Unfortunately without open markets and an arbitrage mechanism it's like reading tea leaves. That's why in my humble opinion automatic markets are so critical. If anyone knows HEX (it's not super interesting use case but) it rocketed into top 20 market cap briefly with 50% of its trade volume from a Uniswap market. Those are conceptually similar to dispensers - except bidirectional with dynamic pricing.
-
It may be a meme project but I have to respect a trustless market like that. I like free markets vs. gatekeepers.
-
when does the unconfirmedBalance become 0?
-
what does swap yields mean?👀👀✍️
-
is it the farming and shards something
- 26 November 2020 (25 messages)
-
-
-
-
I’ve had a theory for a while that the 🇺🇸 government has its eyes on CP.
These big companies don’t need to ask permission to build this KYC network.
They issue their own coin on CP that identifies they have KYC a non custodian Bitcoin wallet.
The other cos decide what KYC coins they decide to trust.
They send the asset to the burn address associated with the wallet and the sent asset is stored forever to that Bitcoin burn wallet’s address.
The asset held in the burn address Identifies that that non custodian Bitcoin wallet has been KYC by which particular party.
When other custodian Bitcoin wallet users want to send to a non custodian wallet, the co simply runs a search for that non custodian Bitcoin wallet to identify if any KYC tokens they trust are held in that wallets burn address.
If the trust is a match, the custodian Bitcoin wallet can send, if not, it’s prohibited. -
-
-
-
-
The money is still separate from state issued currency.
They just want to know where it is going .
They were never going to continue to allow Bitcoin to operate in its current state. -
-
LOL
-
-
-
but why its no their finances it the people's money why know where they are spending it
-
i prefer anything with cp but not kyc
-
-
that indoctrination is too strong with ppl who want to make nice with governments
-
its not the case, they just don't want you to spend money with certain countries period
-
we know that some countries are bullies (no names) and want to dictate where you spend your money
-
-
and why would anyone want to feed that
-
-
hope you know that all governments have you as apart of their trust and the trust law they have is statutory contract (colorable law). all paper money is fake (colorable) notes tied to that contract which is why you have UCC codes and why if you knew these things in any country you wouldn't want centralized debt paper and or cards that promote going back under colorable contract.
-
I think they lowered this significantly
-
https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-regulations/guidance/funds-travel-regulations-questions-answers - and proposed new rule is $250
- 27 November 2020 (21 messages)
-
Exactly
-
But according to most governments that have a constitution the audit of privately held assets is illegal which is why the SEC can't find a way to pass laws on it so the only why to stop you is by them breaking the law
-
Or making you pay more taxes going back into paper
-
They still can’t take the money away though. Bank, they confiscate your funds.
I know most people here are against this, but I’m all for it.
This is the most possible bullish case for XCP IMO.
If you ever want to see the vision of stocks, bonds, equities, etc live and be protected by Bitcoin using CP, this was a law that was always going to happen. -
Obviously I see things differently but this is not the only method I'm currently working on something that literally proves that this doesn't have to happen nor does kyc
-
-
-
Second time you're showing this guess you're shilling at this point
-
Everything
-
The reason bitcoin was created is so that ppl don't need it
-
Here come humans bringing the control right back to where we were taken away from 🤦🏽♂
-
-
And also the control over ones funds and assets by making them private without a name on the wallet
-
-
-
So you think you control cause you own your key if you give the info away lol
-
-
OK then so you own an asset and to tell ppl all you hold especially the ppl that control the market your name and address and if the don't want to spend even if you have your keys you can't buy a thing
-
That's super smart!
-
All they have to do is just starve you out and wait
-
You have this kyc thing all figured out
- 28 November 2020 (2 messages)
-
-
Bitcoin, so much more than a currency.
Everyone likes to talk about Bitcoin the money, but Bitcoin is truly more than that. First and foremost, Bitcoin only has value because of its security. After all, if the network wasn’t properly secured, theft would be easy. If theft was easy, nobody would buy Bitcoin and Bitcoin would be worthless. Bitcoin is the worl
- 29 November 2020 (1 messages)
-
- 30 November 2020 (9 messages)
-
This is exactly what I teach my students
-
Also exactly how I am two steps ahead
-
These are the tools to the proper perspective. I call it looking glass
-
Xcer. Smarter than the average 🐻
-
Nice theory!!
-
tiger resting
-
😁😁
-
-
Wasuuup