- 21 May 2021 (112 messages)
-
-
-
-
DevTut: Enhanced Asset Info | Counterparty
Developers/Notes_and_Tutorials/enhanced_asset_info.md
-
That is the officially supported/decentralized way to enhance your asset with more info…. Only a few fields…. Or can use the coindaddy.io asset enhancement service which is basically the same thing, just a bunch more data fields
-
-
There is an example
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
You can type it but can you say it?
-
-
Why is it limited to only 48x48?
-
because that is the official standard that was established by the founders.... we need a small icon to show... doesn't make sense to try to cram a big image in there, as we have to be able to show a tiny image in explorers, wallets, etc.
-
I would like to see a CIP to extend the enhanced asset info fields and standardize more of them.... and eventually it will happen... but for now, you need to use 48x48 or the imgur/ format if you want images
-
You can do both if you use the imgur/ format in the description for the LARGE image.. and then use coindaddy.io to just upload your small asset icon (you can upload asset icons for free for any assets owned by an address you have verified with coindaddy)
-
How is it a Bitcoin NFT if it is a sidechain 😆
-
🔜™
-
-
Yes… it can be any size
-
-
Hello friends
-
Yes
-
Yes, even after locking supply you can always change asset description
-
Yeah. I really don't like their marketing
-
-
A great infographic would be all the different NFTs and their equal equivalent in security listed as a country army or something
-
-
-
Nonfungible Turds
-
Was there a plan to be able to change a divisible asset to a nondivisible one and vice versa if you retain 100% of the supply?
-
I think Jdog mentioned this a while back and he said yes but it ways off.
-
Couldn’t we have sends that don’t happen on-chain that expire. Like an order escrow credit.
Protocol allows you to send to any wallet free and instantly. The receiving wallet decides if they want to claim the tokens by submitting a txfee. If they don’t submit the txfee after so many blocks, the token is returned to original sender or last sender who received a paid tx send for the particular token. -
A security audit would be extremely useful, but not easy to fund by crowdsourcing.
-
-
Hello friends
-
Yes... CIP3 proposed by JP Jansen... It has not yet been implemented... but a CIP exists for it... you will be able to reset the supply and change divisibility.. as long as you (asset owner) hold 100% of the supply and the token supply is NOT locked. https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/cips/blob/master/cip-0003.mdcips/cip-0003.md at master · CounterpartyXCP/cips
Counterparty Improvement Proposals. Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/cips development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
Its been a few years since we had a security audit.... We had one in 2014 done by Peter Todd and Sergio Lerner and found NO significant issues... https://counterparty.io/news/sergio-lerner-completes-independent-security-audit/ ...
The core functionality itself has not changed much since that time (sends, orders, issuances, etc)... Tho we do have some additional features we have added which could use some review/security audit :
- Subassets (CIP4)
- P2SH Data Encoding (CIP8)
- Enhanced Sends (CIP9)
- Multi-Peer-Multi-Asset Sends (CIP10)
- Segwit Support (CIP15)
- Sweep Support (CIP20)
- Dispensers (CIP21)
I am working on something which I think could/should bring some additional attention to Counterparty and help provide us with some longer-term funding for things such as this security audit.... Will speak on it once it is closer to fruition.Sergio Lerner Completes Independent Security Audit | CounterpartyThe Counterparty team is proud to announce the completion of our first independent code audit. Focusing on the security of counterpartyd and the Counterparty protocol, this audit was completed by professional cryptographer Sergio Demian Lerner between February 24 and April 5 of this year. Sergio has discovered numerous serious bugs in Bitcoin, and is extremely
-
I think the plan was to change issuance amount.
-
I think this would require multisig
-
Is that how an order takes place, two signatures, one from buyer and one from seller?
-
2-of-2, person 1 broadcasts the tx with no fee. Person 2 signs the tx and contributes the fee from his utxo set.
-
No… orders are created and signed individually…. The system matches the orders and does the swap… no mulitisig involved unless one of the addresses placing the order is using a multi-sig address
-
Will CP need to be updated if Taproot gets activated?
-
A Bitcoin version bump to stay on the latest Bitcoin core release will need to happen (easy), but no, CP won’t need to be updated to continue working.
- 22 May 2021 (6 messages)
-
Anyone having transaction signing problems and other API issues?
e.g. accessing History in eds.counterwallet.io
failoverAPI: Call failed (across all servers). Method: get_raw_transactions; Last error: JSON-RPC Error:
Type: Server error
Code: -32000
Message: Got back error from server: {'data': {'args': ["a bytes-like object is required, not 'str'"], 'message': "a bytes-like object is required, not 'str'", 'type': 'APIError'}, 'code': -32000, 'message': 'Server error'} -
Have you tried using a modern wallet like freewallet.io.... think we've been saying here for a while that counterwallet sucks 😛
-
I just tried some API requests to the counterparty API (api2 and api2) and both seemed to work fine and return results almost immediately (under 1 second)
-
-
The error you posted is coming from counterblock... a component of counterwallet... you should try using freewallet.io DESKTOP wallet if your having issues 🙂
-
- 24 May 2021 (57 messages)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Have 250 packs coming up!
Would love to see some of the rarepepe ogs make some new memes for sure. -
-
please dont... LOL.. not sure I could handle the musktastrophe 😛
-
-
Haha I love this idea
-
-
-
-
I did throw some good parties in high school when my parents would go away 😂
-
-
Yup… I was on date in the middle of all that craziness in Huntington Beach😜😜
-
more chimpouts eh, what's the excuse this time
-
-
I don’t understand how people do not like Musk. He’s a machine.
-
depends on where you stand on transhumanism
-
it's just straight up mind control, btw
-
slave is not a sufficient word for what humanity will become
-
Musk Learns the Hard Way: Crypto Doesn't Need a Savior
Crypto doesn't want kings. Elon Musk is finding that out the hard way.
-
The neurolinks project?
-
yea
-
Regular people don't know about this project.
-
-
It’s going to happen either way
-
Are you for it or against it?
-
what seems inevitable is simply the will of the powerful
-
but yeah, since it's inevitable, all the normies are for it
-
i'm getting more and more fed up with this world
-
Respects
-
I agree
-
-
What can we do about it?
-
I’m not against it. I think it can help a lot of people with disabilities and improve their lives.
But I could defiantly understand why you could hate Musk for this. But maybe it’s better Musk is the one who does it so someone who is really evil doesn’t do it first.
Or maybe Elon is just a freak and should not do it because no one else would for a long time. -
not cooperate, be more discriminating with technology communally. (it has to be communally)
-
Failures in submarines. Haha but Musk may have ideas no one else does and how can you doubt his ideas.
-
if he wants to build colonies on mars, he should build colonies under the sea too
-
the problems are gonna be analous
-
analogous
-
If you were the richest person in the world, what would you do?
-
well, i'm a catholic, so there's that, and i want a decentralized economy as much as possible
-
but space colonization is a good venture
-
it would be the life affirming solution to over population
-
"Hookers and Cocaine" with My Lottery Winnings
A guy on Fox 5 Las Vegas is brtually honest when asked what he'd do with his Powerball lottery winnings.
-
😂
-
lmfao
-
The neurology stuff is interesting. Much like Elons other ventures, he didn't really invent anything, he's just inventing a way to implement the thing in mass. I've worked on BMI research for a while. The tech has amazing potential for people who are paralyzed and other neurological issues. What makes me a bit concerned is, Elons system is supposed to be read/write. All the research I've done was with read-only systems.
-
doesn't matter much, it's only one small update away at that point.
there's always some heartwarming medical reason, you know. but then people will start shooting up catgirl porn straight into their veins and so on. -
and then it will in some sens be very powerful, which then becomes a threat to the establishment (like the internet), which demands manipulation and censorship
-
just read your ted kaczynski ;p
-
-
Me too. It's overwhelmingly the dullest thing in crypto.
-
- 25 May 2021 (23 messages)
-
Wait what lol
-
Oh lol nvm
-
The DECENTRALIZED Exchange (DEX) is for users to swap any token for any other token... so YES, you can swap everything on the CP exchange.... rare pepes, tokens from projects, etc etc etc.... if you have a specific question about a type of token, then ask... your question is not really clear what your asking
-
"working on something"... yes, people are always "working on something" on CP 🙂
-
-
What do you mean working on something? Projects to invest in or NFTs like RarePepe’s?
-
What’s up Tone!
-
Hi everybody
-
Guy howfa ?.
-
Hypothetical question.
If an organization wanted to use Counterparty for a massive high-profile event which would require mobile wallet (or at least mobile browser) functionality, how much money would they have to throw at the problem to have something functional in time for Bitcoin2021? -
freewallet.io runs on desktop, and iOS and Android (native), as well as has a web version (https://freewallet.io/mobile/) ..... Issue with building a new wallet is not just the UI, it is having a backend to support the UI... one of the reasons why counterwallet is not easy to use now is because it uses counterblock, and beats the heck out of it.... freewallet.io uses the xchain.io APIs, and uses them much more sparingly than counterwallet does..... Open to people writing more wallets, welcome it... but this is the wrong mindset (rush to get some wallet out the door for some event in a few weeks)... just my $0.02 ..... Even if you threw $50-100K at me, I wouldn't be really interested in designing a brand new wallet UI and getting backend that scales within a matter of weeks... but then again, thats just me, i'm a weird-o 😛
-
IMO, Wallet design is not something you want to rush on.... changing look and feel and colors is easy... designing a user friendly UI that people can instantly understand and use is much more difficult and time-consuming... but again, welcome anyone to try... we need more XCP wallets 🙂
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The app was called takara and it was written by mandleduck / Christian moss…. He might be able to revive the app for a price…. Might be worth reaching out…. It was def a cool app
-
Takara GPS went away because it can be gamed. Someone far away will claim all those tokens.
-
Christian Moss (@MandelDuck) | Twitter
The latest Tweets from Christian Moss (@MandelDuck). Lightning Network and Bitcoin, app/game developer and tinkerer, co-founder at @zebedeeio and @mintgox. Tokyo-to, Japan
-
-
Ya… maybe a fix for gps spoofing now or maybe rate-limit pickups by users, etc…. Worth reaching out IMO
- 26 May 2021 (93 messages)
-
-
-
-
The cool thing was being able to drop tokens anywhere without visiting the location…. Could drop pepes in Japan without being there…. Having a controlled withdraw system is prolly best method to prevent manipulation (still possible, but more work for scammers)…. Christian would know how to best do it😀👍🏻
-
Yea, that's right. That makes sense.
-
So far, what I've come up with is to have a series of addresses, and preload them each with a different series of unique tokens. Then distribute a bunch of non-unique tokens to the registered participants. The unique token addresses can be set up as dispensers to vend out the unique token in exchange for the non-unique token. So effectively, the participants walk around, looking for the QR codes, then when they find one, they send it one of their non-unique tokens and receive a unique token corresponding to that specific location.
-
-
-
-
anyone have a link to a tutorial on how to make a dispenser?
-
use freewallet
-
desktop or mobile?
-
Desktop
-
thank you sir.
-
-
If you have any questions about what goes in what field... hover over the questionmark and it is explained in a popup message
-
you the man! thx
-
RAREPEPE getting close to my sell point of 1BTC. might be time to sell one or two :)
-
So if I want to convert token for token, I should use a dex trade?
-
You want to be part of the Bitcoin2021 auction?
-
Yes... use DEX for token swaps... dispensers are just a vending machine meant to sell stuff for BTC
-
I have 10 RAREPEPE and 100 HAIRPEPE and 1 PEPERARE
-
how much for all of those?
-
40BTC easy i think
-
not sure i can make it down. may have to go pick up my plane
-
-
-
it’s in San Diego so probably won’t be able to.
-
-
-
There is something similar I think different from counterparty but look up golden whale pass. Also gabor gabuc (total sp here) is working on something that sounds similar. Almost like Pokémon go but for Bitcoin.
-
But I can't do dex stuff on mobile right now, correct?
-
Correct, no dex support on mobile
-
-
-
Ahem.
Ironic that you understand some artwork shouldn't be disclosed but want the room to publicly innovate? -
-
-
-
I discussed this at length with John and it will be difficult, but it was something we planned to implement eventually on the protocol level… But it would be expensive, and considering it’s been 4+ months of waiting for funding on cip24 (oracled dispensers) and still not even 1/3 of the way to funding the probit listing, the issue is funding…. It’s easy to have ideas, but without devs to build it and funds to pay those devs, it’s not gonna happen.
I wrote an “asset vending machine service” years ago for coindaddy that did just that (token to token swaps from a vending machine)… and tokenly wrote swapbots (token to token vending machines) …. So these things HAVE been designed and built before, twice in fact, and yet both services shut down due to lack of use and funding…
I’m busy working on other projects right now, so no time or interest in working on reactivating asset vending machine service on coindaddy at this time -
-
CoinDaddy Asset Vending Machine Service
This is a brief demonstration of how to setup an asset vending machine using the asset vending machine service at CoinDaddy.io
-
IMO if the community wanted these services, they would have supported the builders of the services…. Maybe devon and I were building stuff before there was demand for it…. But it’s been done before, multiple times, and both services are down…. That should tell you something.
-
-
-
0.25 btc to fund CIP24 (oracles dispensers)… and 0.30 BTC for probit listing… those are the current items that need funding…. Can’t have nice things if no one pays for them. I love cp and will continue to support the platform, but the lack of funding is very discouraging… if CP community wants to move the platform forward and get more features and users and support, it needs to step up and fund stuff, not just request more features…. Not directed at you art, just a general comment on state of CP
-
Overall objective is to have tokens associated with various murals throughout Miami. People go to those murals to claim tokens. I thought an easy way to implement this would be through QR codes and individual addresses. That was before you guys made me understand the limitations of the vending machine feature.
-
-
Not everything needs to be in the protocol.... in fact, I am against overcomplicating the protocol for things like this when they can be done (and have been in the past) using centralized services..... If users wanted the services, they would have supported the centralized services, then it would be clear there was demand for the services, and it could get added to the protocol.... but IMO we should not be adding things to the protocol until it is clear that there is demand for it.
-
I do not see the need for immediate direct transfer of ownership on demand. Consider using another medium of things for people to gather and a central hub for them to redeem those physical token like clues or keywords in order to get the art/pack. Multi-send could deliver multiple people multiple works
-
-
@Superart I was wondering if you could do what you want in a similar way of how those rare pepe giveaway cards works. You can hide qr codes all over Miami, which when scanned will identify an unique code. Then you go to the rarepepewallet enter the code and receive the card to your wallet. Code works only once (if not mistaken) hence first one that scans the QR code gets the rare pepe
-
This can still be done by an indivdual user/developer pretty easily... NOT on a protocol level.... scan a barcode.. barcode goes to some url/website using a code.... that code would directly tie to info about the artwork (location, amount left to give, users who have claimed, etc)..... the service/site could then allow users to "claim" a token, send them more info about it, etc etc..... could do all sorts of stuff like not allow a token to be claimed until X event happens... also using a centralized service would be much easier to keep control over the process.
-
^^ even simpler idea which will work right now... no additional development needed.... great suggestion 🙂
-
👍
-
-
-
-
It's the kinda "keep it simple" approach. Why the need to issue non-unique tokens, distribute them to users, and then the users sends them somewhere (extra tx fees) to receive unique tokens. With the gift card implementation, users will not have to pay any tx fees, since those will be covered by the company/individuals that set up the gift cards (if not mistaken)
-
-
I recall that if you had a CP wallet connected to rarepepewallet, redeem a card was a really easy and straightforward process...
-
-
💡 that comment was not directed at that idea
-
Yes...appears to be options to add extra BTC to the gift card to cover a users tx fees to claim on both rarepepewallet.com and mafiawars.io... tho looks like RPW has the field greyed out for now... @hodlencoinfield should be able to answer how RPW gift cards work a bit better than I.
-
How difficult would be the implementation of the following: Someone creates a gift card (prolly through freewallet and also adds some btc to cover tx fees) and receives a code. Then through a webform (that takes only 2 input values: gift code & CP addy) the redeemer input those 2 values. At the backend 1)there is a check if code is valid 2)a tx is initiated to the wallet addy provided.
-
Just trying to help here...
-
Yea, this is probably the way I will go with it. I've been reading through the dev documentation to get a vague idea of how hard it would be.
-
-
Fair enough. I just suggested that for simplicity. Users pay the fees, means that users have to sign the transaction, set the appropriate tx fees according to mempool & have a BTC balance to their CP wallet etc. etc. (hence getting a bit more complicated for novice users). Hence they will need to use a mobile solution where they will have imported their private key (to be able to sign the tx)
-
IMO... best route is to create a bunch of different qrcodes that access a url where users can "claim" their card.... throw up a page where they can enter their "claim" address... and then do something like MPMA for batch-sending all the cards out periodically (once a day or something)... this will allow you to have much more control over the process, and save you a TON on BTC fees (since your paying one BTC fee to send out all the cards at once versus having to pay for each tx individually)
-
👆👌
-
FYI... I added the ability to sign messages and throw the signed message back to a callback URL to freewallet (works in mobile and desktop)
Here is what I would suggest... simplest/quickest way to get what you want with minimal dev effort
1.) QRcode contains a URI which contains
a. message to sign
b. URL for icon for project (displays in wallet when signing)
c. URL for callback to server/website to pass the signed message to
2.) Users scan the qrcode with freewallet
3.) users are prompted to sign message in wallet... and click ok
4.) Freewallet makes a call back to the callback url/server and passes
a. users address
b. message being signed
c. signed message
5.) Your website/service verifies that the signed message is valid
6.) Do checks to make sure user hasn't claimed before, etc.
7.) Display a success/failure message to the user about their claim
8.) Batch out all the gift cards once a day using MPMA (Multi-Peer-Multi-Asset) Sends.
This will all work with existing tools... all you need to do is write the website which accepts the callback URL, verifies the message is signed/valid, store the users address, and sends out the tokens periodically (I would do it manually)
Here is info on the QRCode spec I wrote in 2016 to support this type of functionality
https://gist.github.com/jdogresorg/782d697c610f543ad0d7da615160a4b2
Here is a list of example URI schemes that freewallet supports:
https://github.com/jdogresorg/freewallet-mobile/blob/master/uri-schemes.htmlDescription of Authparty authentication scheme which extends the counterparty: url scheme to support actions and callbacksDescription of Authparty authentication scheme which extends the counterparty: url scheme to support actions and callbacks - QR_Authorization.spec.md
-
Yea, I like this. I will read through the QR spec
-
🔥🔥🔥🔥
-
Somewhat less than popular opinion => There are some nice CIPs queued up, but there's a lot to be said for NOT adding features and this perspective does not get expressed often enough IMO because it's unpopular.
-
Developers aren't necessarily attracted to ever-changing platforms, especially if their project would involve running a Counterparty node - which should be as easy as possible to maintain. Protocols in general should aim for stability, not only to avoid breaking things and to minimize the number of bugs introduced but also to promote the idea of feature development by 3rd parties happening on top of the actual protocol instead of being part of the protocol.
-
-
I say that despite some evidence to the contrary in the Ethereum space, where huge development projects take place in spite of the ever- looming threat of a complete change in everything.
-
-
-
FYI.. just re-submitted the vindax.com XCP/BTC listing to coinmarketcap.com... now that we have some decent daily volume going through it, CMC should add it to the XCP listing, which will help show that we are generating a bunch more daily volume than we were months ago ($50k+ on most days now)
-
-
-
As you can see... more daily volume and more interest in the project... slowly building up steam 🙂
-
Agree with this. The protocol is good the way it is. We need more developers overtop. Every feature we add makes it more of a security liability.
-
-
Do you have enough BTC to complete the tx? Sometimes if your BTC is broken into many small UTXO amounts, it's unable to complete a tx. Or maybe it's something with the server settings...
-
-
That's an alternate setting to use than the default
-
Error signing message... usually only hear about that when a user is using freewallet.io and has been switching back and forth between multiple 12-word passphrases (not how the wallet was intended to be used)....... I suggest you logout of freewallet desktop entirely then close the app.. open it fresh, enter your 12-word passphrase, and try again..... not being able to sign typically means that the index which maps address to private key has been corrupted.... 99.9% of the time because of users switching back and fort between multiple 12-word passphrases
-
@nizozitos ^^
-
-
- 27 May 2021 (14 messages)
-
-
-
-
-
-
🔥🔥
-
-
Is it me or it's written maimi on rarescrilla card? 😅
-
-
-
Not a card, just a sticker for the box.
-
-
These look amazing!
-
Thanks 🙏
- 28 May 2021 (24 messages)
-
Thanks more goodies arriving tomorrow
-
-
-
could be all your balance is in a bunch of UTXOS... which makes your transaction bigger... which requires more fees
-
either send more BTC to the address... or gather your dust and/or tiny utxos into a single UTXO using electon (send all your BTC from yourself back to yourself)... or try again (occasionally you'll get a wrong balance from addrindexrs)
-
Why counterwallet keep raising transfer fee? Do it again and again never get enought
Why counterwallet keep raising transfer fee? Do it again and again never get enought.
-
Your not doing anything wrong... just don't have enough BTC to pay for the transaction.. probably because you have multiple tiny utxos
-
-
more... can't give you an exact amount without seeing the exact transactin your trying to create... and even sending that exact amount would then result in you having 0 BTC balance left
-
do the simple thing... send more BTC... stop sending tiny amounts.. send a couple hundred bucks in, you'll have no problems
-
-
-
Could also try sending with a lower fee... BTC network isn't that busy right now
-
-
any dispenser veterans in the channel this morning?
-
i want to sell 3 dank RAREPEPE for .666 each, or a total of 2BTC for three (very cheap)
-
This looks like it’d be set up to dispense at 2 BTC each or 6 for all 3
-
Wait, I see the give amount is 3
-
That’s good, just wouldn’t be able to buy 1
-
thank you sir!
-
i endedup doing 3 @ 0.7BTC and can dispense one at a time
-
Series 1, Card 1!!! very rare!
-
-
- 29 May 2021 (6 messages)
-
-
-
-
-
Looks amazing. How will these packs be purchased?
-
Thanks Bob. Packs or individual cards will be able to bought or traded at XCER . CO once it’s live.
I haven’t figured out pricing yet, but I will put up a certain amount of packs for sale at a discount for the CP community. - 31 May 2021 (1 messages)
-
Dex-Trade
Dear Users, We are happy to announce that withdraw without verification limit was increased to 1BTC! Now you may withdraw up to one BTC per day without passing verification. Enjoy your trades😘