if you are a bitcoin token loving person you need to come to this

Decade celebrations for crypto are very rare

join us

hey everyone... Friday night and I'm balancing the budget... well, trying to...

This is my dispenser, it's been up for quite some time, the floor, it fell away soon after I created it.

https://xchain.io/tx/484acbe3bd214efae1a9396dcb77269f9a0d32bba6eccc852e492524b5cacce1 -- 0.00011500 -- 750 XCP

Tota cost to buy the 750 XCP = 0.08625 BTC.

So, to get it off the books, I'm offering a 15% BTC rebate to anyone who clears this dispenser.

I will send back 0.0129375 BTC to the buyer.

That makes the adjusted price 0.00009775 BTC per XCP, a net cost of 0.0733125 BTC.

Contact @RarePepeTrader if you're planning to hit it, so I know when to be available to send the 0.0129375 BTC back to you.

The lowest price is 0.00008000

I can read an order book, thank you

it's not for you

It is for the person who want to buy.

the lowest price currently is 35 at 0.00007700 each

Plenty available under my price, I'm just posting my offer. People can DM me if they want to haggle on price a bit.

Join @XCPDESK for verified known good community member XCP dispenser updates.

The PEPE Project is excited to release the next card by KeroNFTs GOODGAMEGARY in honor of the 77th SEC Chair GaryGensler! KEK

Join the Fun here --> @pepeproject

Can someone tell me the origin of this dispenser

https://xchain.io/tx/088f045521b55631e9cb6a9df22d0973fa0322e4a130a95926a79844b45bf085

I’m getting 1FWDonk

Don’t know him

But I’m not seeing the XCP in that wallet when the dispenser was opening

This is the FreeWalletDonation address

1NwxWVP18aki7rfAXTj8jJyUhqAvXKbqXu

Ah my b, I'll delete my above comment.

1nwx is on trusted dispensers list I believe

Dude matches for a rarepepe with 1600 XCP and then goes and sells all his XCP

Lol

Bro, only reason why you have that rare is because you had XCP

Idiot

Whoever opened a XCP dispenser 17X45VvvVtHKvkywsLgBjF2Kty7QGDzXXa address, I sent 0.00531520 btc from 126VuKw3LTUWgmYx94TtSqfjiQooRdpva6 and the dispensed closed before I could receive my XCP

Could you kindly return my BTC ?

*** UPDATE ***

WILLING TO DO A 20% BTC REBATE ON ALL BUYS OF 100 XCP+ ON THIS DISPENSER - IF I SEE ANY BUYS 100 XCP+, I WILL SEND 20% OF THE BTC BACK TO THE BUYING ADDRESS

Why you guys dumping XCP?

I can speak only on my own behalf… daughter sick with a virus, needs medical care in a country where we don’t have health insurance.

Somebody empty that dispenser fast!

I wish to her quick recovery RPT.

I have someone committing to buy 150 of the 750... additional buyers for the remaining 600 also greatly appreciated.

The 20% rebate drops the price to 0.00009200 per XCP.

Oh man, so sorry to hear that.

I pray for your daughter's quick recovery.

Thank you.

Hi cp lovers.
Is there an alternative to rare.estate to show the wallet as a gallery (rare and other cp collection). Rare.estate seems no longer up.

I recommend the Token.Art mobile app for your collection viewing pleasure, at least on mobile devices.

Desktop, not sure there are any All Collection options any more...

digirare.com perhaps

dankset no?

wtf?

lol

Yeah of course dankset !!

Thanks !

https://x.com/pepeinsidee/status/1728452999478140937?s=20

doing a common giveaway, if anyone is interested

done ser

❤️

We're practically giving away Pepe memorabilia.

Don't sleep.

You slept.

🚨 2 Rare Pepe Price Guide 2023 - Genesis Edition sold for 83,333 sats 🚨

10 remaining

All those sold through tomorrow will come with a hand drawn pepe inside too

xcp.ninja works well and can aggregate multiple addresses to create a showcase.

https://xcp.ninja/profile/mikeinspace

Example

It's raining some pepes 🌧️🐸 https://xcp.ninja/profile/mikeinspace?slideshow=parallax%2C3%2C20%2C0

Nice looking awesome

Trying to buy one rn it ain’t working unless I’m doing something spastic

Probably sold out or spoken for at this point.

Yep, confirmed.

Ok thanks

Bot must be 10 pieces behind cause I was trying when it said 10 to go

Waouh so nice! I will def have a look on that one 🤩

OJOGBONMETA (The 3 Wise Pepes)
Book of KEK II (Dank Rare)

21 supply
Physical available too.

3/5

1st dispenser
https://xchain.io/tx/0a4ad9ec5a9a16dcc0937907136a8a91f5b40162b9319880d58892a85c20b7f1

Dex trade for DMC:
https://xchain.io/tx/2527386

Thank you all for your support always.

PEPEFOCUS
Book of KEK II
Card 48, supply 21

Dispenser: 5/5
https://xchain.io/tx/eb3d0b8bd0c1bc2faa604a423188c3f3ec7cc0fe88fac282b201d039f90f3e1a

Dex trade
https://xchain.io/tx/2527386

Thank you all for your support always.

I can't create emblem vault.
I see "Check Fields!" disabled
Anybody have idea?

wts djpepe
made dispenser
0.25 BTC
dm for quote price

You’re never gonna unload that. The community is too tight-knit and the liquidity so low that no one is going to want to buy stolen assets even at a great price. Your best bet is to work something out with the victim.

Send it to me because I destroyed one

And then I will return it to whoever got robbed

ask the Emblem Vault team in their discord - they use support tickets there

their discord link and info n stuff can be found on their twitter:

https://twitter.com/EmblemVault

click curated and select one from the drop down

projects are on there, also a standard xcp one

Updated - 1550 XCP available on verified dispensers

https://xchain.io/tx/e814b81c7933cc4aa3d41efff8701ecae49ff85b54fadf8e7e1520baa8f0f007 -- 0.00008790 -- 103 XCP
https://xchain.io/tx/a21c190c64c086a68f47ead878b3ce42877c26444e9c3d03489fc4c145cfc54e -- 0.00010500 -- 55 XCP
https://xchain.io/tx/331e33ae887acbcc61da7ee9f12af8c035f81e262da60486301c3f943dc0bd60 -- 0.00010600 -- 792 XCP
https://xchain.io/tx/484acbe3bd214efae1a9396dcb77269f9a0d32bba6eccc852e492524b5cacce1 -- 0.00011500 -- 600 XCP (*)

- (*) This dispenser has a special deal: see https://t.me/xcpdesk/954
- Please note: I will be mostly unavailable for the next 2 weeks due to a very busy schedule and limited connectivity

https://x.com/johnnyreeeeeeee/status/1728902194886500815?s=20

if any1 interested ty

@admins how do you hide the members list to only display the admins ?

Where/how is he picking up that much XCP?

Maybe he knows something we don't?

Maybe he knows something......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4bIAR__Uhk

Hello Counterparty sers, i'm trying to create an asset and my transaction is stuck in unconfirmed. I let it sit for several days and tried resubmitting with a higher fee to no avail. Any suggessions as to what's going on? ty
https://xchain.io/tx/e7b5d4744911ae5c84893d4f5dd62c1db42ad3aa20b97b328a4cdccb4958f3d8
https://xchain.io/tx/71f61076c079065bf7f3a8973ac0cc9006ad1c6165e4aa6f074ced2533f93756

its not just fee that decides what tx goes into the next block, sig ops are important too .. so even if you pay more you may still have to wait a bit

it's been 9 days :,(

How does this "Sig ops" work?

more sigops slower mempool propagation

miners don't want to include txs that may not be in all the mempools as it slows block propagation

to be fair you don't have that many sigops .., so if you were to pay more it would confirm soon ... use CPFP

I’m guessing it’s Zaif?

Is anyone able to summarize the benefit of this proposal ?

https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/cips/discussions/124

The proposal discussed in GitHub's CounterpartyXCP/cips Discussion #124 centers on a minor update to the protocol, version 9.61, which significantly impacts the consensus mechanism. Key points include:

1. Node Operators' Participation: Federated node operators must express their support for one of the release candidates that activates a new counterparty-lib protocol. The decision on whether to merge a new major or minor version branch into master depends heavily on the support of these node operators【6†source】.

2. Avoiding Consensus War: The discussion highlights the imminent risk of a "consensus war" due to unresolved conflicts and procedural oversights in the proposed new version of the protocol. Suggestions to avoid such conflicts include maintaining the current protocol or centralizing infrastructure, though these have their own drawbacks【7†source】.

3. Release Candidates: Two main release candidates are mentioned: one, led by Jeremy Johnson, that is set to activate a new protocol, and another, by Juan Alemán, that proposes to deactivate the new protocol【8†source】.

4. Review Time for Updates: The discussion suggests that two weeks is insufficient time for reviewing major/minor consensus hash affecting updates. It advocates for a longer review process and the necessity of a CIP (Counterparty Improvement Proposal) for such significant changes【9†source】.

5. Non-compliance with Release Procedure: It is noted that the current v9.61 did not follow the established release procedure, underlining the need for adherence to protocol in future updates【10†source】.

6. Impact on Bitcoin Stamps Community: Concerns are raised about how the proposed changes might diverge the bitcoin stamps community from xchain data, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the broader implications of such updates【11†source】.

The proposal thus highlights the complexities involved in protocol updates, especially those affecting consensus mechanisms, and the need for a balanced approach that takes into account the views of various stakeholders in the network.

Does this not bring more centralization ?

Merging changes to master without consensus is what is called centralization

What’s the benefit ?

i don`t see any benefit in divide the community at all but im so new here to know... all i know is that if we want this to grow this is not the way also make a release with all this changes instead of do some releases with really minor changes is crap as i can see the benefit for example in reducing dust but not in all the rest of it, and doing this way you need to accept all or refuse all obviously a bad way to do upgrades to the protocol

What is the cost benefit ?

for me it is negative but this is a qestion that everyone has to do to itself

I sent some btc to a dispenser for xcp, and even though I used a higher fee it’s taking forever to confirm. Can you CPFP a btc send to dispenser to speed it up or will that cause issues?

You can speed it up with CPFP.

Perfect, thanks!

Thank you for the nice summary

Fully agree, small incremental changes is way easier to be reviewed. Still not found the time on my end to check all the release PRs

whoops, intended this for the dev channel, sorry

I thought too that we were at dev channel lol

The community has the right to know what upgrades are being forced into updates. Some are addressing broken features which have already been implemented and other additional "features" that are by/for one person and are adding contested and unresolved functionality (or restriction).

If he were collecting XCP at Zaif, it would make more sense to slowly buy up like 10,000 XCP, and then send them to his wallet in large batches.

Zaif charges a rather high withdrawal fee, so it wouldn't make sense financially to send small quantities from Zaif.

Has there been that much movement out of dispensers?

Seems like those are slow going these days.......

I mean it’s zaif’s non hot wallet.

I have a little trouble understand what the wallet is doing, but it looks like their sends (which is 52 pages long) is to a relatively small number of addresses. Do you think Zaif has this address as their cold wallet and then keeps multiple hot wallets as some kind of security strategy?

I noticed when withdrawing, it takes them quite a bit of time, and I recall their explaining that for sizeable withdrawals they first need to move it out of cold storage.

Agree, community does have the right to know what updates are in a release, which is why EVERY update is listed, complete with links to each PR where users can review the code, the testing process, conversations, etc...
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib/releases/tag/v9.61.0

All discussions take places on public areas, code commits are on public github, no new changes in this release are not already known for many months... activation block selection process is same as it always has been (2 weeks after release)... so, please clarify exactly what features are being "forced" by one individual...

I am certain that ppl here would like to hear about what horrible features are being forced on them... also please clarify where we are departing from the EXACT SAME release proceedure and activation blocks that we have been using for the past 5+ years.

It feels like some people confuse open-source software with social media where your opinion must be heard.

Didn't ya hear Arayan... your opinion doesn't matter as a community member... only NODE operators opinions matter now.... wait, since I operate 10 of the 15 nodes, does that mean I have more say than others.... DOH... guess Juan gotta rethink that consensus logic a big more 😂️️️️️️

I don't think we are talking about opinions here. We are tallking about major changes in open source software that throw nodes out of consensus and force forks if all node operators are not fully prepared, tested, and ready to make such changes together.

The only thing the stamps team has requested is a simple delay so we have time to test and get prepared to move into the next version in alignment with all node operators (regardless of historical timelines). Lots of work is ongoing to prepare for a public stamps indexer release which will benefit both communities, provide easy access to non bitcoin stamps (aka cursed stamps / named assets), and provide more validation and visibility for ongoing development. This stamps indexer release will also encourage and even require more counterparty nodes operators to further validate, decentralize, and strengthen the ecosystems. It's is further cementing the collaboration and union with counterparty.

I would hope the community support for helping to keep node operators in alignment on breaking software changes is a prudent goal.

If the community support for xchain pushing a breaking change that throws it out of alignment with xcp.dev, the stamps ecosystem , and perhaps others then that's a fair choice if they fully understand the implications of such a change/fork.

TLDR: "hey j-dog can we defer this one a bit, we were caught off guard and not prepared for such a change. thanks for your support and pushing it forward, but we don't want to get out of consensus with xchain and cause a clusterfuck for the community"

I've already answered your concerns and questions here in this post, and in the DEV channel... https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/cips/discussions/124#discussioncomment-7685889

sorry that you were "caught off-guard" by this release... all the changes have been discussed, and release announced a week ago, and activation blocks set, same as they always have been.... your demands that you have time to do a FULL PARSE are a personal preference... which is fine, but not something we should hold up the release on

As mentioned I don’t care to do a full parse on CP but we will for stamps and to do at least some validation on the upgrade before it goes live. We cannot blindly put this in production without some testing. I also know other operators are not prepared. It’s easy to be buried in code for weeks and not notice these breaking changes on github.

FWIW. It’s no more than what I said as a tldr. Usually these types of requests to partners in a project get a reply like “sure, let’s chat, what do you need help with so we don’t need to delay” and are followed up with a bottle of whiskey and some assets for kekmas. No need for contention.

yes, and usually requests like "hey, your action is really abusive on CP, can we discuss this?" dont go ignored for a month, until the point where the community decides a fee on XCP numerics is neceesary to stop the spam.... THEN you listen... but only after painting things as J-Dog is stopping innovation, J-Dog bad....... only AFTER other devs spoke up and made you aware of the seriousness of your spamming did you stop..... and, did we do an XCP fee on numerics? NO... why... because you finally started listening and we agreed to a middle-ground of you stopping spamming... funny how you expect others to operate how you want "Hey, can we do this, cool, lets collaborate" when it suits your needs.... but when the platform your running on (and explorer your using and wallet you launched with) reach out nicely and try to coordinate, it is rejected and ignored

TLDR... listening and coordination goes both ways... not just demanding cooperation and consideration when it suits ya

Anywway... as I announced in the CP Dev channel... I'm taking a step back from CP dev and leaving CP dev in the hands of OGs @jp_janssen @hodlencoinfield and @shannoncode .... I'll still be around and giving my opinions on CIPs, improvements, and doing code reviews, etc.... but I'm going back to just being a community member and not the sole code custodian... much less pressure... I'll still maintain xchain.io, freewallet.io and will continue working on building out BTNS.... but wont be pushing forward any code commits to master without reviews and agreements from the other core members with github commit access

Ignored messages? The last dm’s I saw from you was June 15th. It if was that urgent, serious or abusive I would think a dm would be prudent. We were using the protocol as designed and took action after a thorough discussion and coming to an understanding together.

Cp consensus wars lol

I hope there's a historian among us taking notes.

At least some memes

no need to re-hash old drama bro... I created a "Stamps Dev" channel 3 days into stamps... tried to coordinate with stamps devs... talked to ya in there (not via DMs)... anyway.. it is what it is... you should be rejoicing... You wanted a decentralized Counterparty, you got it... now got 4 devs with commit acces instead of just one..... Looking forward to seeing how quickly changes get pushed through and seeing how much dev progresses...

Maybe fuk your feelings

consensus wars... LOL... well, it is a silly term to begin with.... but, if there WAS to be a consensus "WAR" who do you think would "win" the war..... prolly whichever version had the most community support and tools built out for it.... it is ridiculous that dev talks have devolved to comments like "IMMINENT CONSENSUS WAR"..... concern-trolling, trying to cause drama..... not gonna be any war at all.... xchain/freewallet gonna be on whatever is on counterparty-lib master..... which is 9.61.0.... if you guys see 9.61.0 as a horrible thing, your free to coordinate a rollback with the other CP devs...... but, I think you will find that they also do not share your views that this is a forced update.... but either way, no longer my concern

Burn it all down

burn what down? what are you talking about? no one is burning anything down.... I'm running xchain.io and freewallet still, i'm still a core CP dev, just not going to "FORCE" changes through myself anymore.... which is what I thought you wanted... big bad J-Dog not in control anymore (hint, I never was in control, the community is)....

anyway... this is a community project, and I look forward to going back to just being a community member and not having to deal with all the personal attacks, concern trolling, and drama..... I'm here to have fun and build... just like you @reinamora_137 🙂

It is hilarious a request for deferring the block activation is met with so much resistance. Nothing is a personal attack here. If it’s impossible to do so then so be it. We will see what happens. at least src-20 is safe thanks to your encouragement to move it.

It is hilarious that a dev hasn't reviewed the same process we have been using since Counterparty's release to choose the activation block.... and they just learned about it and are upset...

It’s afraid

Nobody is upset

you sure seem upset about the release... and asking for a delay in the activation block... a departure from what we have been doing for 8+ years...... Why should we not follow the same processes we have since the beginning? cuz you say so?

anyway... this is devolving... you want a reparse of stamps data, and I think you can do that no problem without a full parse of CP data

All it is was a simple request. A yes or no we can’t is all that’s required.

I can dump all STAMPS assets from the API with a few requests.... so should be pretty easy to do a full-stamps parse again I would think

Or a fuck off and fork is fine too

Either way no need for drama

Perhaps if there cannot be a response on that we can get some insight on the specific reasons for not cancelling or deferring this release? Something besides it’s always been two weeks - over a holiday week nonetheless. And why the rush to push code that we simply want to have better peer reviewed and improve the process overall.

I have answered your question on github, in dev channel, and in here... I am sorry that you feel that this release is rushed, and that you need additional time to review these code changes.... we are doing the same thing we have been doing for years (even if you dont like hearing that response, that IS my response).... there is no need to hold off this release because you feel that the release process should change..... and as to the timing of the release, software is released when it is properly tested, no other reasons.... this whole "releasing over a holiday weekend" like it is some planned tactic is nonsense..... I'm following the exact same process CP dev has for years... going forward, you guys can figure out what release process works for you... and if you (and the larger community) feel that they want to delay releases and push off feature activation beyond 2 weeks, that is something the community can sus out

TLDR... I've followed the same release process the entire time I've been doing dev work on CP.... and am now stepping back from dev and letting other devs handle releases.... up to you to coordinate with the other devs on any changes you want... I am no longer pushing ANY code changes to master without the other core maintainers approval (except in the case of emergency hotfixes)

Is someone pruning your stamp collection

???

https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib/releases/tag/v9.61.0

Release notes for anyone interested in reviewing the changes associated with this latest release, including links to each pull request, github issue, testing, conversations, etc 🙂

Lots of fixes and I didn’t even know it needed fixing. Nice job keeping things going j dog and others involved

diverging consensus across nodes creates much more impact than just for stamps. it's a hard fork in the protocol for xchain. It has nothing to do with feelings. It's about a solid process for consensus changing releases versus minor revisions. Many of the changes in this release can be made without impact while we further test the consensus changes.

let the memes continue

This is the documented issue for public review and feedback. There is much more to it than my simple request for a delay in the usual process.

https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/cips/discussions/124

clearly the claim of just following how it has been done is bullshit because the documented release process was not followed anyway: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib/blob/master/release_procedure.md

The precedence of breaking the process flow has already been made. A simple delay is not an unreasonable request.

LOL... yes, clearly I am speaking BULLSHIT because a developer who left the project defined a release guideline that the project has not followed since he left the project... a release guideline that NONE of the releases in the past 5 years have followed.... but yes... ALARM!!! Lets cause a bunch of noise and drama like someone is trying to pull something over and force through contentious changes.... LOL

if that was not the current process then why was not the process documented? How can you expect us to read and be up to date on all these supposed undocumented processes

untested changes to an important public project that create a fork in consensus is a problem for all stakeholders.

I am a single developer, running EVERYTHING for the project for 5+ years when everyone else walked away... JOHN VILLAR was maintaining the project and when he died, I simply followed the same process he followed for the previous 3 years of him doing dev... the same process that Javier (who also has been working on Counterparty for 5 years) follows

undocumented process that is

you can't stand by 'it's always been that way" so we are not being flexible on the timeline nonsense if there is no process in the first place.

Yep... and this is why I am done with CP dev... new devs coming in telling me how it should be done... attacking me for maintaining CP for years when NO ONE else did... and not having ANY clue WTF they are talking about in many cases....

just asking for another week or so to avoid major problems. idk why so much anger we're on the same team. nothing here is attacking. no big deal the process is not followed, but there is also no reason to be so stubborn on the 2 week timeline when important stakeholders are simply asking for more time to review. I believe you are rn the only one that can defer this update correct? can the devs do something?

Like I said before... I'm done with pushing code commits to master... take your outrage up with the other core members @shannoncode @jp_janssen @hodlencoinfield

was just asking if you could revert those changes, ndb if not. i'm sure those guys will be cool to at least listen to the request to delay a bit.

I tried to make a serious objection to the lack of logic behind the limitations of the refillable dispensers when taking into consideration publishing on a national or global scale for print. I feared weighing in with my common sense perspective because as you see here it would quickly devolve to a reverse personal attack. Perhaps now that this bully has stepped down we can have an authentic open discourse

gm

It may be that your objections aren't taken seriously because you have some sort of objection every step of the way.

How many xcp assets do you hold? Whats your addy!?

You guys have been beyond nice to this clown who is obviously here for the wrong reasons. Time to remove them and move on

Nah, he's a good dude. Met him IRL.

Nah. He’s the lead Stamp dev and built a lot of the back-end infra. One of the few people (outside of JDog) actually running CP nodes.

If we need to point fingers, who better than @mikeinspace? imho, of course.

Had I just went to bed that night telling myself it was a dumb idea none of this would have ever happened

Stamps are ghey af no wonder

Stamps are fake and ghey and also the biggest project ever launched on CP

Too big to fail?

Stamps will go down into irrelevance just like ordinals and all the other bullshit lol

Btw: the halo effect of Stamps (aside from on-boarding a ton of new users and devs)

- Royalties on CP
- Assets trapped in 3 addresses finally emancipated
- 1st class explorers like xcp.ninja

Some people prefer stagnation I guess

Crab bucket mentality. Imagine wishing failure on something that can only elevate CP

I guess we’ll miss out on the next bull run by being unprepared. Scandalous that CP fumbled the bag in 2021

Should have been BAYC

Now knockoff Pepes on ETH are bigger and more successful than the OG.

Unbelievable

SAVE US GORDON GONER!!!!

eww

We/I don't want Jimmy Kimmel

Yeah money is gross

Mainstream media cannot promote bitcoin assets...it's like suicide

There's far bigger frauds that have far more money than anyone here... its definitely no absolute metric of success.

I don't appreciate your mischaracterization.

Seems like a blatant personal attack and not a response to the issue brought up

Even when we were just having fun, the fun was due to money

Money is great, but its not everything.

Fun due to Pepe imo.

I like having fun too and I’ve given away a lot of free assets. Gave away early stamps worth thousands. But projects need to be sustainable.

Exactly

You’re right. But things need to be sustainable. For the last decade we all were able to “have fun” due to the goodwill of JDog. Things have costs even if unseen.

Yeah, but it relied on the trading

Media and celebrity will never promote Counterparty like they did with BAYC. It's too fake.

Counterparty is a final boss for them

That's not what I thought we were talking about. You said you wanted Rare Pepes to be BAYC... It triggered a convulsive reaction in my stomach. Sorry about that.

Not literally, just in terms of stature. Maybe Punks is a better analogy

https://xchain.io/asset/FINALBOSSS - by kawabangga_f

People actually think Punks were the first NFTs. RP should have that cultural significance

wanted to write this

I think that aera is quite over, greenwashing did not work, today folks know.

i know a ton of ppl that think punks are the first nfts

but look im not the og og like you but if you want to get ppl on xcp you have to make it stupid easy for them

tiktok kids dont have the patience to read or to think

I am certainly biased regarding this and those I know know mostly today.

they need 3 clicks and stuff should popup in theyr brokensea like all other nfts

yeah well you wont/cant change them

Yup.

sadly i got told this more then once when i tryed to get ppl on rarecoco 😅

if they cant buy it with metamask they wont touch it

Counterparty will take off when Eth goes to zero or at least on its way down. Eth is a wound on btc. It's scabbed over and not fresh anymore. At some point it will peel off and heal and you'll barely be able to tell it ever existed.

I am somehow biased and here for the tech caused I have altruist and non altruist interests in both counterparty itself and STAMPs. I have spent the last two years trying to contribute to counterparty culture and the last year participating in STAMPs as creator and collector (currently I have the biggest stamp collection accross wallets)

My problem is beyond early src20 (that I understood both the FAFO from src20 to exist and the concerns from the current counterparty status quo to accept them) I have never seen an incompatibility between those two worlds in a development sense as to have a break out in between them. Saying this without having contributed either counterparty either STAMPs in terms of development but with the love for both what counterparty is and what STAMPs have brought in terms of interest and new platforms

Just wanted to say hi and unnecesarily flex that I have lots of frogs and stamps

i dont think that thing will go away that easy tbh

Wishful thinking. Ordinals has already outpaced NFT traffic on ETH. Ordinals has massive dev interest and very good tooling. They also have mindshare “the first NFTs on Bitcoin”

That’s what you should worry about not ETH

ords are def taking the market right now

It is absolutely wishful thinking I agree

I'd just say that the truth will bubble to the top.
It's a bitcoin fixes this thing in my mind

And stamps are cool. I like them js

But that’s the thing. The “Bitcoin” in this scenario is Ordinals. They captured the meme.

And very early ordinals are rarepepes

yeah thats the fun thing first ppl on ords where the pepe's

born in btc hahah

but no joke it would be nice if all could be somehow together

and make that btc nft system

Can you inscribe an ordinal over an older ordinal?

Maybe… idk… I don’t follow ordinals that closely though I think I heard that’s possible… maybe cursed?

Can a traffic light represent ownership of a house

you can inscribe more then once on onr sat

There is no sat 😶‍🌫

You can probably inscribe deed text onto a traffic light.

Amazing abstraction. Casey convinced the degens that Sats exist and you can “inscribe” them

When he did that I realized: technical reality doesn’t matter so I invented the fake and ghey protocol: Stamps.

It really was an awakening for me.

Difference is yours is based on something solid, while you can still lose your "ordinals" just by using bitcoin normally

People think Ordinal theory is more than it is. It’s just an abstraction. Sats have been tokenized and we all agree that holding a Sat equals ownership of some onchain art. It’s identical at a conceptual level to Counterparty. But Ordinals clearly has better marketing.

I don't agree that it's identical, as you can't just lose your CP assets by sending some BTC to someone else, whatever the wallet

For me it's a really bad design

Funny to see a great UX/UI on top of something that flawed

Im not a dev 🤣 so dont burn me pls just forwarding what i know from ords

Ordinals has the current attention of the Degen Machine, which is well-oiled and well-funded. The infrastructure is of nowhere near as sound design as Counterparty.

The degens will eventually move on, because that's what they do, move from thing to thing.

yeah always the next shiny thing that will make 100 bucks

Yep once the bloom is off the rose, they'll leave and there will be nothing but a bloated blockchain in their wake...

I think we can all agree there isn't much of substance behind most copycat jpeg projects or BRC-20 tokens... It's all just straight-up gambling. That stuff just doesn't hold value, and thus it doesn't hold attention.

The ordinal and inscription (data) have no hard link, whereas CP assets do?

Degens love pain

we arent worried cause all those scams are going to zero. vc pump n dump garbage

It actually proves they are all terrified of cp

using UTXOs instead of sats makes too much sense to prevail

instead of acount balance also

or a way to back and forth between account balance and utxo would be ideal

Perhaps not

Allow me to interrupt the bullying for a shill:

https://scarce.city/auctions/hero-of-bitcoin-game-boy-limited-genesis-edition-collectors-package-21-1-xcp-hpi0S

Comes with an XCP token.

An obvious concern that has been unspoken is this low class sophomore approach to handling the mildest problems.

Repeatedly shutting down valid concerns with ad hominem

Not becoming of the project.

Have either of you stopped to think that one reason the protocol hasn't taken off is because of lack of seriousness or dignity as relates to the business culture that we all practice when attempting to work together?

Eh... I think one of the reasons why this community hasn't seen more success has to do with the fact that everything has fallen on a single developers shoulders... A community manager certainly would help to manage monthly dev meetings, post to social media, etc..... Come to think of it, didn't you get that role... then get a bunch of ppl complaining because you were kicking ppl from channel... then went radio silent and refused to do the job, refused to resign? Actually... come to think of it... weren't you on the last Counterparty Foundation which basically did nothing for 2 years?

Not being the core dev anymore frees me up to share my personal opinions.... no more need to hold things in out of need to protect the community from drama, etc... not looking to cause any drama... but best believe, I'll be speaking my mind and calling out personal grudges (which you, me, and a bunch of ppl know this is... and why your generally ignored).... all you do is complain...

Let's talk IRL
Until then you are on ignore
Peace off

I suggest we focus on what is important... development and moving things forward as a community rather than personal attacks... but make no mistake, I'm free to speak my mind now.... Enjoy 🙂

Punycodes

Peace off.

How do i get a non taproot btc address?

With freewallet.io

wallet.xcp.ninja or counterwallet do the job too.

Then how does one sell one of these after buying one?

Can u Explain what that means

its on freewallet.io the main wallet everyone on counterparty uses

Ok im trying to send now and ots sayjg you must enter a valid address but its the exact address from the xchain website

Im trying to buy this kobek and its giving me this address which isnt working to send to from freewallet

bc1qzztsgw8ma0aslvzsg2zfu6rgx30u0r74xqyhz5

Now it says error from counterparty server

Error communicating with counterparty server**

dont send to a taproot address you wont get a dispensor working

Ok i am trying to buy a diff piece now and its a diff sddress hut im getting the error abovr

Non tap root

But the wallet is giving me an error

I assume you re sending from phone
Freewallet only works with address starting with for example 134Vmj or 1MUg
bc1diiqq address doesn't work from phone ,idk why

5863cb704d2d63fad6399644ff1eb3423790804756597193926aa7310a39b00c

I switched to ninja xcp one im on desktop

And this seemed to work?

getting this error on an MPMA send , any idea why its breaking?

Updated - 2266 XCP available on verified dispensers

https://xchain.io/tx/e814b81c7933cc4aa3d41efff8701ecae49ff85b54fadf8e7e1520baa8f0f007 -- 0.00008790 -- 103 XCP
https://xchain.io/tx/20142e460f67d3dffe2cfa4aa2ab7ca36fc980295b0afce9da229305ed5bc29c -- 0.00008850 -- 716 XCP
https://xchain.io/tx/a21c190c64c086a68f47ead878b3ce42877c26444e9c3d03489fc4c145cfc54e -- 0.00010500 -- 55 XCP
https://xchain.io/tx/331e33ae887acbcc61da7ee9f12af8c035f81e262da60486301c3f943dc0bd60 -- 0.00010600 -- 792 XCP
https://xchain.io/tx/484acbe3bd214efae1a9396dcb77269f9a0d32bba6eccc852e492524b5cacce1 -- 0.00011500 -- 600 XCP (*)

- As always just DM me if any questions or issues with these dispensers
- Please note: Currently travelling with limited connectivity
- (*) This dispenser has a special deal: see https://t.me/xcpdesk/954

@jdogresorg I know you're interested in building a JVM. You may be interested in https://botanixlabs.xyz/en/testnet. I haven't vetted it, just thought I'd throw it your way.

Thanks for sharing... will dig into it when I have some time... also need to dig a bit further into https://bitvm.org/bitvm.pdf before Javier and I start writing up our VM

Currently leaning towards writing something entirely new (tho being able to be a drop-in replacement for ETH sounds appealing)..... not a fan of solidity... wanna write my code in javascript/node and then compile into bytecode and execute in the VM..... Its still just an idea... but, been a dream of Javier, John, n I to have a VM on a "party" platform... and to have a multi-chain "party" platform that plugs into multiple backends (ie pluggable chains - https://github.com/chiguireitor/cips/blob/cip-16/cip-0016.md)...... Javier and I plan to work on both of these things in early 2024.... Perhaps we will add the VM to Dogeparty before we focus on pluggable chains and building BTNS out into a full multi-chain platform. 🙂

How do i get xcp into a wallet somehow

Or buy some

pretty simple.... send BTC to a dispenser

in freewallet... click Dispensers tab, click XCP... pick the dispenser you want to buy from.. click buy

https://i.gyazo.com/c9ec5a332a88213a7dc7fbb7222615b3.png

or go pick a dispenser yourself from the list of XCP dispensers

https://xchain.io/asset/XCP

https://xchain.io/tx/c3a45ba1d12ff2ba3921ef020c68c3ab6e725fede05338c03ced32e7d14599b1

There is a link to a dispenser.... you can see how much XCP is in the dispenser, what price they are charging, etc.... to buy XCP, just send some BTC to the dispenser.... once your BTC payment to the dispenser gets into a block... the XCP is automatically credited back to the address that sent the BTC payment.... one single BTC payment and you get the XCP added to your address 🙂

Ok looks like i can only get 1 at a time rly ?

no, you can buy as many as you want... if you want 2, just send 2x the requested amount... if you want 5, send 5x the requested amount... you can buy as little or as much XCP as you want

OHHHH ok ok great

https://i.gyazo.com/431f5d1bc7f9c09c116643cfff01baf4.png

you can see... ppl buying different amounts, not just 1 XCP 🙂

but be careful that when you buy... your buying from a dispenser that is selling at least 1.0.... some scammers try to list with a low price but only sell you 0.1 XCP... try and trick ya... so make sure you pay attention to the give amount 🙂

Thank you!

Do the tokens show only btc dispeners on xchain or are thhere xcp dispensers too / how do i find address to send to for an xcp dispenser?

dispensers allow users to sell any token on counterparty for BTC.... but since the protocol can not escrow BTC, you can not get BTC from dispensers.... dispensers receive BTC, not send.

I mean for lets say a card im trying to buy with XCP

Is it the address under “source” say on an XCP/___whatever card market

IF they were terrified of the potential of CP, the obvious move would be to hedge the risk by BUYING XCP.

you can't buy with XCP from a dispenser... you can only buy from a dispenser with BTC.... however, you can trade any asset for any other asset on the counterparty decentralized exchange (DEX)... prolly best to take some of these questions to the Freewallet channel where there is a bunch of FAQs that will prolly answer some of your questions https://t.me/freewallet_io 🙂

https://x.com/ModernRelics_io/status/1729959465250640241?s=20

Just if you haven't heard of Ninj'Advent calendar yet. First presale ends in ~10h

https://twitter.com/StampedNinja/status/1729488745160679468

has anyone had any issues with the latest freewallet build? I can't seem to get it to launch on Mac. Is there a way to roll back or get an earlier build so I can run it?

All versions are on GitHub

https://t.me/freewallet_io

its prolly just this.... me not signing the app with my developer key... so apple doesn't want to let you run it... i'll work on app signing in the next release... for now, this should work... https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/1e2cc086a13c9a2d045876852b57e5be#my-applemacos-is-saying-freewallet-is-not-verified-by-the-app-store-what-should-i-do

ok, thank you. I ended up download the 2nd last release and that worked fine. If I update the description with the 2nd latest release will it fix the problem with images not showing up? Or is that in the latest release?

How many bitcoins were burned in the proof of burn? Writing an article

2140

wait... did you just make that up?

No

ok

Not to my knowledge

I understood 2140 were burned to issue XCP

Isnt 2140 when the last Bitcoin will be mined?

Yep

https://mempool.space/address/1CounterpartyXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXUWLpVr

More accurate:

Thanks for keeping CP running all these years 👍

Doing OTC deals on my new Dank, NPCPEPE! 1721 supply, priced super affordable!

XCP Dispenser stats - Nov 2023 update

Very low volume this month!

https://www.metasudo.com/drdb/stats/node_2376387.html

Thanks to the high fees. DEX also almost empty.