- 23 March 2018 (245 messages)
-
consensus reached -
thanks dante -
just pointing out the obvious. lets attack him now
-
RAR proves point REEE
-
"A Counterparty project maintainer is defined as an individual that has commit access to the (counterparty-lib)[https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib] repository, and has made at least one commit in the last nine month period. If there is only one maintainer, only his or her ACK is necessary."GitHub - CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib
Contribute to CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
just being honest with you Joe
and I think you know I like you and wouldn’t be gratuitously dissing you -
its weird that me commenting on this is creating such an issue for everyone
-
dan always talking about counterparty weird
-
im experiencing it now
-
im being attacked because i think we can improve your cip
-
right
-
you never commented pro or con on what is proposed - you asked why not add something different that you are free to do independently
-
an helper, an hero
-
well maybe the maintainer should weigh in
-
so john i guess
-
/ignore bullshit
-
so you want me to just create an identical cip with an extra sentence?
-
i guess
-
if thats what i have to do to be heard
-
or considered
-
so what's the point of public comment then?
-
just so i know
-
all you want is to add friction to this CIP without getting blood on you hands by trying to make an argument against it which is your usual debating technique
-
for the future
-
not true
-
i'll just create the other CIP i guess
-
-
that other CIP has never been proposed so all you are doing is attempting to add friction to the legitimate one that is on the table
-
jesus
-
i'll just leave you to it
-
still very weird though
-
why not just weigh in on whether you support it or oppose it on a straight up or down basis?
-
i support opening up 1, 2 and 3 if we're going to do anything at all
-
no reason to only go halfway IMO
-
because as you stated, its not a technical issue
-
so if you don’t get 1 and two are you against 3?
-
for that matter lets go all the way up to 16 characters?
no you are not being creative. i summed it up earlier. you should not sit here an waste everyone's time with your rhetoric -
That becomes a technical issue
-
Above 12 is the numeric name space
-
This isn’t rhetoric, not sure why you think it is
-
bump
-
sure
-
later
-
@therealloon3 ☝️☝️☝️
-
Yes I’m against it for the reason that we should limit consensus changes to as few as possible
-
Hard forks mean everyone has to upgrade
-
why?
-
Including exchanges
-
That needs to be coordinated and has potential for issues each time
-
are they never going to upgrade again in your world?
-
i am against any upgrade that may appeal to an exchange
-
i am against upgrades
-
please defer to such and such centralized authority
-
nice.
-
"does not work well with others"
-
add that to my linked in
-
Yeah and i took constructive criticism and made changes
-
But those things were combined into a single cip
-
Memo became part of enhanced send
-
Because it made sense to do them simultaneously
-
Ok
-
No problem, I’ll create another cip and perhaps eventually the two will become one
-
I see that you won’t answer my question that i asked you twice
-
What question
-
Yes I’m against it for the reason that we should limit consensus changes to as few as possible
-
This answer?
-
I just think the cip is incomplete
-
But no problem, I’ll create a new one since that seems to be what the process is
-
Ok
-
Nothing matters I guess
-
-
-
Kirk that's just a lie. -
Top 5 Upcoming Cryptocurrency Games
As cryptocurrency continues to grow, teams and individuals are working every day to bring new and exciting developments to fruition. One sector in which a number of teams are making progress is video
- 24 March 2018 (39 messages)
-
yea just make the XCP burn higher for those gems.
-
single and double as well?
-
there is another asset which is used to unlock all the features, cannot remember the name atm
-
this
-
basically... just buy an XCHAINPEPE or FULLACCESS token... and put it in one of your wallet addresses in freewallet desktop... once the wallet recognizes that you have an XCHAINPEPE or FULLACCESS, you get full access and see the screens I showed above
-
I wasn't around when they set the arbitrary limit to four letter asset names only. NASDAQ allows 4 letter tickers. MSFT etc
-
Ok, so I'm trying to curl the counterpartyd that is now set up, and I'm getting an unauthorized access error with rpc:1234 as the defaults -
haven't changed anything
-
anyone have any ideas whats up?
-
Port 4000 and all
-
Yesterday I tried with Counterparty testnet.I tried to create a numeric token with first issuance of 80,000,000,000. & 786.5 Later received a message that those tokens were created
But in Balance it shows 80,000,000 & 786.5 tokens only.
Why it happened on testnet -
@Needmoney90 Joseph Jeevanand Kommuguri:
Yesterday I tried with Counterparty testnet.I tried to create a numeric token with first issuance of 80,000,000,000. & 786.5 Later received a message that those tokens were created
But in Balance it shows 80,000,000 & 786.5 tokens only.
Why it happened on testnet -
Im not sure what you are asking
-
You made two issuances
-
So you had both added to your balance
-
Second issuance is showing correctly.
But first issuance showed differently. Truncated three zeros. -
First Issuance I created 80,000,000,000 tokens. I got notification for same amount.
But the Balance shows 80,000,000 only
Second issuance is 786.5 & balance is 786.5 is correct -
Can you pull up the tx?
-
Hey guys, just want to let you know your documentation is out of date. All the examples I found for the fednode show the default username/password for counterpartyd are rpc:1234, but in reality the config has them at rpc:rpc
-
might want to get that fixed up
-
Test node transactions. Sending screenshots
-
This one is first issuance
-
hm
-
So, I'm wondering if its due to integer constraints
-
80,000,000,000 is greater than 2^32
-
Until someone more familiar with the protocol gets here, can you make a divisible asset with issuance 100,000,000,000?
-
But balance shows 80,000,000 tokens only instead of 80,000,000,000 tokens in first issuance
-
But the notification says that 80,000,000,000 tokens were issued
-
Ok let someone more familiar with protocol get a here later
Thanks - 25 March 2018 (6 messages)
-
A billion is under 2^32
-
Yeah, 2^36-2^37
-
Im curious if a 100b can be made
-
Clearly over that amount
-
submit a pull request or create a github issue please and it will get fixed. Thx. - 26 March 2018 (28 messages)
-
sure
-
I want to convert all to pepe, but xcp now is too low -
What happen on xcp
-
Used to be strong
-
Any chance it can go back to 30?
-
No new submission. Some that made it before closing are still being added to directory. Its a good thing that submissions are closed. A cap on production is good. We dont need them overly produced like cryptokitties. You want to own rares? There are many who are willing to sale certified assets, balances, and art rights. Also you can buy many at great pricing before value increases and high demand arises. This is really just the beginning for one of the most lucrative and valuable crypto collectible projects out there. -
👍👌
-
OMG it's alive! cool glad to hear there's at least one ICO that delivered 🤣
- 27 March 2018 (55 messages)
-
Hey, anyone know what the RPC command for counterpartyd is to get the incoming transactions of an address over a particular block interval?
-
Got it, thanks
-
Xchain.io down?
-
nope
-
-
This on my end? Xchain nor BoO will load for me now. I was earlier!
-
Works on VPN now. Who messing with my ish
-
-
Hahahaha! BoO even works on VPN too
-
-
-
Anyone around?
-
Just caught up. -
-
Is XCP set up now to mass send an asset to many addresses with one tx charge -
-
Issued a token called CANTSMOKEBTC for a video for the song CANT SMOKE A BITCOIN ft. Chris derose and Peter schiff.. first promo music video token I think. Everyone who provably shares the video on social media will receive one
-
Used XCP
-
when pull request acceptance
-
when a dev with commit access reviews the issue and accepts the PR
-
too long, can't you just ignore process and railroad it?
-
🙄
-
nope. I don't have commit access... so nadda I can do.
-
The documentation said the rpc default credentials were rpc:1234, they were rpc:rpc in reality (when I actually set up my own fednode)
-
Not a huge change, just a little text
-
soon... I've done some basic testing in Freewallet with the Trezor and have managed to send an asset to a trezor and send it back.... so yeah, hardware wallet support in freewallet is coming soon.
-
GitHub - chiguireitor/counterparty-dns: A DNS server using counterparty as it's storage and federation backend
A DNS server using counterparty as it's storage and federation backend - GitHub - chiguireitor/counterparty-dns: A DNS server using counterparty as it's storage and federation backend
-
Try again
-
It no out til April 1 man
-
🙃
- 28 March 2018 (12 messages)
-
hey!
-
Welcome
-
good, programming furiously :)
-
-
groups and users are auto-hyperlinked when an @ is used
everyone interested, please join @AgeofChains -
i like the short links too t.me/AgeofChainsAge of Chains
Secure yourself the Series 2 cards and support the development of Age of Chains: https://www.ageofchains.com/shop
- 29 March 2018 (25 messages)
-
@PepeVote
-
Any one hear got some BTC? -
I didn't hear about it
-
*here I meant. Sorry
-
You got BTC?
-
No, are you offering?
-
why would anyone here have BTC? We only have CROPS and soon to have BITCORN
-
BITCORN>BITCOIN -
I've got some Pepes to spare for some BTC.
-
Really, did that take off? -
the 1st harvest is on April 1st!
-
Haha. Nice. How much did it raise?
-
It will be raining BITCORN soon 😁
-
we only measure the Corn
-
But didn't it sell crop for BTC or xcp or whatever
-
CROPS – XCP DEX
Crops (CROPS:XCP) are arable block spaces suitable for growing Bitcorn on the blockchain. Addresses owning CROPS become bitcorn farms and can harvest Bitcorn, seasonally, until the Winter of 2022. There will only every be 100 CROPS.
-
-
Insane
-
talk about: too bad you did not get in on the GROUND level
-
All the stuff I'm like lol this is dumb about goes to the moon
-
Half a million market cap
-
lel
-
kek
-
FreeWallet
Happy to announce the release of version 0.9.8 of FreeWallet Desktop wallet for Windows, Macintosh, and Linux. This version includes basic support for hardware wallets including the Trezor! #Counterparty #XCP #XChain https://t.co/s4jRuSzWhk
- 30 March 2018 (7 messages)
-
@jdogresorg right as I finish up PepeVote v0.1.0 lol
-
Can it sweep addresses correctly?
-
It doesnt sweep. U can just import a private key and use the address like a normal address
-
@jdogresorg you should join @PepeVote
-
^ no thanks. seems like off-topic spam to me
-
over at @pepevote there is a really interesting mechanism being developed. I'm told it should work with any xcp assets and will be made opensource after completion. Therefore voting could be weighted by ownership of any asset or collection. This functionality seems very resonate with traditional corporations where stockholders vote where to steer the ship.
For these reasons, I advise you to participate in the development. Please try out the website, and contribute to the discussion by staying on topic. thanks :D - 31 March 2018 (21 messages)
-
Civil partnerships?
-
-
hi guys, erc721 style tokens possible on xcp? -
i look erc721 alternative on ledger like blockchain
-
iam gas supplier in cylinders. earch cylinder i want mark with nfc id. as service company and cyls owner i want track all movements of cyls between me and my customers. in one supplier company there r per day 50-100 orders with thousands of changing empty cyls to filled. if system work as standart it will be thousands orders per day. isit possible on counerparty layer?
-
is there anyone here that is able to check if any of the adresses an adress has SENT TO belongs to an exchange or an otherwise known entity?
-
I or does anyone know anyone who could make an educated guess?
-
Yes, but you would need to cut the granularity down to every 12 or 24 hours probably
-
Otherwise it would be cost prohibitive
-
Committing the merkle root of the dataset is enough, you dont need anything fancy
-
Just a timestamped chain of custody
-
That is the domain of blockchain analysis companies, and those tend to close up their datasets (as they can then sell access to exchanges, law enforcement, etc)
-
If you create a static list of addresses you want to check against, I can do that
-
So you input a source, and a list of destinations, and my script says whether it got sent to one of those destinations (with an intermediate hop, because of how xcp works on exchanges atm)
-
As far as proactively detecting exchange addresses goes, you're probably out of luck
-
i want use it as standart in my country, because customer can exchange empty cyl to filled with different suppliers
-
centralised
-
token issuer is local centralization in global decentralized network, and its not bad. but i wanna build system where anybody can register equipment with nfc id and can send ownership of token to anyone without censorship
-
with mobile device i can read id of nfc, collect batch to order (batch of empty cyls changing to batch of filled), write order to blockchain where visible how earch id transfered from one owner to another
-
utube id is _Zc06pK97wE
Official Counterparty Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 Mar 2018 (51)
- 02 Mar 2018 (66)
- 03 Mar 2018 (255)
- 04 Mar 2018 (21)
- 05 Mar 2018 (31)
- 06 Mar 2018 (69)
- 07 Mar 2018 (27)
- 08 Mar 2018 (65)
- 09 Mar 2018 (39)
- 10 Mar 2018 (10)
- 11 Mar 2018 (29)
- 12 Mar 2018 (11)
- 13 Mar 2018 (30)
- 14 Mar 2018 (7)
- 15 Mar 2018 (26)
- 16 Mar 2018 (5)
- 17 Mar 2018 (14)
- 18 Mar 2018 (9)
- 19 Mar 2018 (23)
- 20 Mar 2018 (6)
- 21 Mar 2018 (2)
- 22 Mar 2018 (43)
- 23 Mar 2018 (245)
- 24 Mar 2018 (39)
- 25 Mar 2018 (6)
- 26 Mar 2018 (28)
- 27 Mar 2018 (55)
- 28 Mar 2018 (12)
- 29 Mar 2018 (25)
- 30 Mar 2018 (7)
- 31 Mar 2018 (21)