- 11 June 2023 (11 messages)
-
-
Waaaay too many sh1t coins out there, it will take years to sort out all of the garbage. -
gM - 12 June 2023 (9 messages)
-
is btn coming soon ? -
I am interested -
can join here and i'll announce when something is ready to show ya on BTNS 🙂 https://t.me/BTNS420 -
Putting high transactions on the Dex but transactions are not going through. -
Anyone facing the same problem?
-
Need to put custom next times, freewallet is not updating for the tx, or so it seems -
Counterparty Community!
I personally think Counterparty needs an Official Community Manager that would have the following duties:
- Update Counterparty Docs to create a thorough text and video FAQ for Counterparty and Freewallet functions
- Work with Community to showcase and track ideas for more "ease of use" upgrades and UI fixes for Freewallet.
- Answer any questions and issues from users regarding Counterparty and Freewallet here in this chat
- Develop a monthly Counterparty Newsletter for https://counterparty.io/news/
- Create a monthly official Counterparty Community Twitter Space and invite members of this community to join
- Create an official Counterparty Historical Timeline on Counterparty.io to demonstrate our history and achievements
- Show it all off by being more active and engaging on the Official Counterparty Twitter
The first time duties for this position was written out was from Jdog about 6 years ago, so I wrote up a new job duties draft that I think may be more up-to-date for this position.
Any and all community feedback, extra ideas, or possible changes to what a potential Counterparty Community Manager position would look like would be awesome to hear!
https://gist.github.com/davestaxcp/703efabf36e29ac61e605ee685c196a4CounterpartyCommunityManager2023.mdGitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
-
deal with contacts with exchanges and such -
Financing it is the key problem.
Maybe there is a way to gather funds while also attracting interest to CP?
Perhaps issue a special limited edition CP token or NFT........
Given the recent meteoric rise and subsequent crash of the ETH-pepe/wojak ripoff coins, perhaps a CP token or EFT series that mocks them mercilessly would be timely and entertaining? (all sales funds going to finance CP work).
Historically, the CP/rarepepe crew always have had the best memes/NFTs...... - 13 June 2023 (17 messages)
-
I agree, Though I think even a small portion of funds could give us some much needed upgrades to counterparty.io especially if we have some quality work done for tutorials and FAQs. After that the community could act more efficiently as an arm of resource linking to official Docs and Github links for simple fixes. I think it would help the new user experience significantly.
Maybe that fosters some traction and support from the community after some initial showcase. Just wrote my idea of things, but I want to hear what other opinions on what is most important to do with limited time and funds we may raise for the cause. -
My main thought of this approach was official Counterparty involvement with already awesome community members. Which could help drive timid users who heard about it once, or new "lurkers" to now have a quite higher chance to be formally educated before they dive in to anything Counterparty related.
Whether it be people looking to buy from a dispenser, or someone looking to stamp, broadcast, create tokens, learn about real world uses etc, , all can eventually have a deep rabbit hole of information and history to dive into and experiment with.
Also some of the showcase of history of 'first token minted' or 'first project on counterparty', highest all time sales, newest popular counterparty functions etc. could influence some new ideas and future projects in the space from people just finding out about the rich history of Counterparty. -
The masses aren’t coming over until after the SEC absolutely rekts the shitcoiners -
In my opinion its not about when new users come to Counterparty, it's about their first experience researching the project. I think most don't come here and chat. They see how much information they can gather about what the project does, and has done. I think what is important is that they are treated well and have clear and updated official documentation to do (or learn to do) what they wished to do when they showed up. Being in a clear and operative state of informing people when new users do flood in is important, not trying to guess when they do
-
I think we have a quite large and very different set of members and projects here that may influence all types of people. Let's showcase that and showcase the history of all they have done while making sure new users get a little bit more help than maybe some us did when we started
-
just riffin now though, open to hear what may be more important or useful at this time
-
XCP definitely not a security 👍🎉
-
GREED IS GOOD !!✅ @ModernRelics_io disp.https://xchain.io/tx/7358c6357f16ac0b912e91a55797ec6e33f0d6ef5b2cd688f30804a3fa82459a -
Gm frens.
I have a question around the speed of counterparty. I’ve created a stamp few hours ago but it still hasn’t been created. Also the data in the assets list on xchain is the same for hours. Is the slow process related to some updates or just a congestion on the chain? -
3a322084d3035a7184bbc2ed5b2dbbc81809b54209354d034093a492f2a20698
-
I think I did it the right thing, it was done through the stampchain tool, and it was cheaper than doing it manually so It was a bit strange it is usually more expensive. But I’ll let you check so I know where is the problem.
-
Some other users also shared that they’re waiting for like a 2 days already
-
So maybe is stampchain to xchain thing
-
We’ll wait and see
- 14 June 2023 (33 messages)
-
This tx is NOT a Counterparty transaction….
https://blockstream.info/tx/3a322084d3035a7184bbc2ed5b2dbbc81809b54209354d034093a492f2a20698
Looks more like a payment from an exchange wallet…. Single input, a bunch of outputs… definitely not a CP tx.
Prolly this is the tx of your payment to stamp chain minting service…
Please ask in stamps channel about stamping tx issues…. This is Counterparty channel, not stamps support channel.Blockstream Block ExplorerBlockstream Explorer is an open source block explorer providing detailed blockchain data across Bitcoin, Testnet, and Liquid. Supports Tor and tracking-free.
-
Anytime you hear “stamp”, prolly best to refer them back to Bitcoin Stamps channel…. N not waste any effort looking up stamps related issues.
The Bitcoin Stamps team are earning $$$ through their minting services… so, let the stamps team support their own community n answer stamp support questions. -
Sure thing, I ask there as well, and other users experienced it as well. And yes I asked them because it is through their tool and it was cheaper than manually creating the asset.
Anyways, the only reason I posted here was because on xchain there are only 4 assets created in the last 12 hrs and 3 of them are stamps, so I thought it was counterparty problem. -
Thx for asking there first … fyi a good way to check if xchain is parsing things fine is to check the latest block parsed at https://xchain.io/blocks
-
Your tx prolly stuck in mempool… over 1000 pending cp txs
-
Thanks for the advice. I usually use the coutnterparty wallet and is all good, and really fast, but I was surprised, I've experienced the same delays when the Stampunks were minting ages ago.
But anyways, not to take anymore of your time, thanks for taking a look and thanks for the advice. -
So stamps are not counterparty now?
-
Stamps are on Counterparty… but seems like most of the support questions in here recently are stamps related… so, just directing stamps ppl to ask questions to the stamps projects.
This specific tx was not a CP tx.
If there are issues with cp or xchain, we def want to hear about them…. Just don’t want to spend already limited support time answering stamps specific questions.
No stamps hate, just directing stamps questions to stamps project… just like we do for rarepepe, bitcorns, SOG, etc.👍🏻 -
Would you mind sending docs, i can take a look
-
Spokan/Spokani (Cruisr in 2022) has now deleted all chat history and deleted his account.
He will be back with another account to continue his fake trusted party escrow group scams.
These are the groups he was in and the groups he will likely target again.
He is attempting to sell the 300K PEPECASH he scammed from Cash.
As well as the PEPEFATHER and PEPEMANE and other high value Rare Pepes he has previously obtained fraudulently including PEPEGIGGITY and HINAMATSURI
So as always, everyone please be alert and always double check user identities with someone trusted. -
He is no doubt here using other sock account(s).
-
Spokan/Spokani (Cruisr in 2022) has now deleted all chat history and deleted his account.
Most of the assets in this address 1MhXj52WGyomzQUQ4FqAG9hZaJz5toCBNL have been obtained fraudulently in fake escrow scams.
https://xchain.io/address/1MhXj52WGyomzQUQ4FqAG9hZaJz5toCBNL
There are currently three vaults open with stolen assets in them.
Please DO NOT buy these assets from this scammer.
PEPEFATHER https://xchain.io/tx/822701762292792ca319851c485d98bf6710a23313fc55986f3d6523f046fcbf
HINAMATSURI https://xchain.io/tx/35143f8cf59c512cb146a7acf9be5a893a1f6aa0ecdae4f3a6b5e55d86afdf63
PEPEGIGGITY https://xchain.io/tx/3b98fff7a8db5133dc767db28f71f5cc857366014143f29e932d1029e2220422 -
-
Great interview with sull about his history with crypto, some of the early Crypto days... experimenting with tokens, counterparty, cryptoverbs, etc.... fun trip down memory lane 🙂
-
Planning to sell asset ownership of these two asset names:
https://xchain.io/asset/ORDINALS
https://xchain.io/asset/UTXOS
Dm me serious offers if interested🐸 -
EXTRAORDINAL available too 😉 hmu -
why can't i send the link? -
weird
-
this is official link from xchain
-
lmao
-
FDCARD
-
what is this card about?
-
spam this is ass gifs
-
lol
-
-
yes
-
anyone got issues with broadcasting Txs? - im seeing complaints of v2/v3 upgrade for chain.so when Freewallet tries.
- 15 June 2023 (97 messages)
-
Helloo -
I wanted to ask
-
this market https://xchain.io/market/BTC/RAREAIRDROP
-
the buy order should show up on the "exchange" tab on freewallet
-
is that correct? as I cant see them.
-
using the XCP DEX Ticker for BTC is not advised, though is possible. What is advised is to use the dispenser tab on the page https://xchain.io/asset/RAREAIRDROP to see what listings are up to buy with btc
-
we are getting many scammers into dispensers
-
we have planned an exchange of two counterparty tokens
-
the thing is that some user will like to sell some tokens for BTC
-
as far as i know from the buyer side it should be a problem if he keeps his wallet open during the dex trade
-
on the seller side they need to have the wallet open for the trade to be complete
-
am i right?
-
is there any other issue here?
-
I´m trying to write a guide for Stamps/xcp assets and xcp/btc based on all the resources i found
-
there is a guide for using token/xcp markets rn - https://docs.counterparty.io/docs/wallets/counterwallet-tutorials/dex-trade - At the moment I'm looking for some documentation on a deep explanation of token/BTC market on XCP DEx exchange, but if there is not yet, documentation will be written soonDecentralized Exchange | Counterparty
It is possible to trade on the Counterparty decentralized exchange directly inside Counterwallet. You can trade any token against any other token, including XCP. (Trading against BTC is planned for the near future.)
-
the CIP's written by John Villar that enabled dispensers were to smoothen this process a little more and dispensers are like vending machines, though its imperative to use high fee's when purchasing from them
-
scammers suck and I hope you guys are making sure to note the address any scammers are using, NiftyBoss does search through XCP dispensers specifically to note any addresses that are "trusted" or link to trusted addresses that have been time and time again trusted with not closing a dispenser while someone is looking to dispense. In most of the cases with dispensers where we can contact the seller, any mistakes, overpays, or stuck unconfirmed tx's are dealt with
-
At the moment I have been trying to log alot of common problems to put into an FAQ and have a proposition for that to get done here^ feel free to let me know if you see anything else you would like added to a new FAQ or some features or fixes you would like to see
-
check this, its a resume i did with the info we have about the scams happening https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WLsb8U4dpwmMj1bCnvzZcYybiWeicxM7x7ApSvM2BN0/edit?usp=sharing
-
Scamers use bots to frontrun you with another tx to buy so that tx close the dispenser. Even if you do high gas they just pay more as they do it in collections with values over 150$
-
love this iniciatives I think they will do a lot of good to CP
-
I got this steps by talking with Jdog. DEX BTCPay Overview
---
1. Place order to sell something for BTC
2. Place order to BUY something for BTC (BTC Buyer)
3. BTC Buyer has to monitor for order match
/api/order_matches/{address}
4. On order match generate BTCpay tx
create_btcpay using the order_match_id (order_match_id = order1TxHash_Order2TxHash)
5. Send the BTCpay transaction with a high miners fee to get processed in next block
6. Wait for btcpay tx to get confirmed and verify you got tokens from order (optional)
Freewallet DEX BTCPay code
Another thing to be aware of when using BTCpay is sellers aren't guaranteed a complete divisible asset sale. Buyers may partially fill the order leaving the seller with fractions. -
“Imperative to use high fees” really means nothing when dealing with a malicious actor. They will just pay even higher fees than you. -
True, I hope we can find a solution for these issues, or even bring back more use of the original token/BTC function to relieve this possibility of malicious actors.
-
Just sad cause many I have used so many dispensers and dealt with so many nonmalicious users, even reached out to dispenser creators for any issues I had, but it is true, it is used too often for nefarious means
-
yeah me too, but many new eyes have come so scammers have found their way.
-
There is a CIP to improve dispensers with some good solutions IMO
-
This is true, but we still have HUGE successful trades using this feature
for instance:
https://twitter.com/phon_ro/status/1647014552817500160NooNe0x.eth (@phon_ro) on XHow to buy a RARE PEPE from a dispenser? Short explanatory video ft. @pepe__wtf @CounterpartyXCP #BTC special ft. @tyler @cameron via WINKELPEPE by @DanDarkPill An OG 1/1 Rare Pepe has been added to the @6529capital collection 🫡🫡🐸🐸
-
which CIP is it
-
check this, it have the link to the CIP as well as the key points on the conversartion ;)
-
Solutions to "rugspenser" problem
Attack vector: Scammer detects incoming buy and immediately sends another buy transaction with a higher fee. The scammer’s tx gets priority and the legit buyer loses his bitcoins. Possible solutions: 1. Pre-payment before full payment This requires a protocol change. The logic is simple. If less than a full dispense is detected, allow up to 12 blocks for the second tx. Perfectly safe as the protocol keeps the token on escrow. The buyer, if not trusting the seller, can thus make a tiny pre-pa...
-
Thank you for this Documentation, I see now the long history of discussion on this on the forums
-
yeah I just started to dig in last week
-
and I like that a possible fix is being discussed to make sure scammers dont have an opportunity anymore
-
but I think its really important topic
-
Thank you for your work
-
for the safety of the users
-
I´ll go to sleep will catch up tomorrow
-
the information on the doc i think would be useful to post on the forum as well
-
to keep it all in one place
-
but will dig in on this ty for sharing. Night! ❤️
-
yess have to do it, GN!
-
No one else I guess
-
I found JPJA has been documenting and proposing some solutions to the issue, will link more when I find it
-
Solutions to "rugspenser" problem
Attack vector: Scammer detects incoming buy and immediately sends another buy transaction with a higher fee. The scammer’s tx gets priority and the legit buyer loses his bitcoins. Possible solutions: 1. Pre-payment before full payment This requires a protocol change. The logic is simple. If less than a full dispense is detected, allow up to 12 blocks for the second tx. Perfectly safe as the protocol keeps the token on escrow. The buyer, if not trusting the seller, can thus make a tiny pre-pa...
-
havent seen too many issues relating to that recently, if its pretty new, maybe create a new topic here: https://forums.counterparty.io/ and have some devs and community look through it
-
seemed to get over whatever hump it was this morning - seems the failover to chain.so was the issue, but this morning the tx didnt failover anymore.
-
yess I need to find the time to do some writting, will do as soon as I can!
-
Also needs a delay for rugspenser being closed. I think 6 blocks delay for both scenarios would be fine -
that just pushes the scammers to front run rather than close fast -
The proposal adds a delay, there should be a delay for both
-
I think the pre payment/ partial payment method is best options as is trust less, and uses counterparty escrow ... adding a delay to dispenser close does not stop a scammer front running anything in mempool
-
Hey @MrCoins !
-
Disagree
-
What do you mean you disagree? -
How does a delay on dispenser closeing stop a scammer from buying from his own dispenser? I just can't see how ?
-
I posted the solution a while ago, you a delay on on closing dispenser and also a delay for the buyer. 1st tx gets paid out with a 6block grace period
-
The dispenser should payout to the first visible tx not the first confirmed, they can be labeled. Then when closing a dispenser the "close" action should take 5-6 confirmations to close the dispenser to give time to any pending transactions to confrim first. These two actions would prevent front running and closing out dispensers.
-
What about a malicious actor tying up every dispenser with no actual intent to buy, at zero cost, just for the LOLz
-
How would they do that?
-
They would be sending btc to the seller... so their loss
-
RUGSPENSERS series, its back
-
First visible text… then double-spend it back to yourself
-
Well after X # of confs the dispenser can payout others, so you are saying someone will dounble spend and waste tx fees just to tie up dispenser for a few blocks?
-
seems like the miners would like this solution
-
visible ? as in unconfirmed? we spoke about this ... whose mempool is the authority? ..I vote mine lol
-
Eventually a tx will confirm and the lolz will be on them
-
but who saw what first ?
-
xchain mempool and you are talking about the small probablility that a tx is sent exactly at the same time
-
which is also an issue
-
or someone lies
-
who is someone ?
-
the scammer who front runs his dispensers
-
How will he lie to the dispener about visible tx?
-
whose mempool is authority ? xchain? mempool? my node ? your node ?
-
Pick a trusted node
-
lol
-
Yes my node
-
🙂
-
OK so it's MrCoinsParty it is from ow on with no rugspensers, guarenteed
-
100% guaranteed super professional high quality service
-
Use this mempool: https://mempool.space/The Mempool Open Source Project®
Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with The Mempool Open Source Project®. See the real-time status of your transactions, get network info, and more.
-
if the dispenser can trick it then they win
-
I'm not sure this logic can even be applied to a dispenser...
-
in the end there may be no easy solution
-
it can not.. dispensers act on confirmed transactions
-
First come first served. the tx highest in the block are first ..miners can buy all the dispensers if thy wanted to
-
At that point, I would say there are probably better “trusted” escrow solutions rather than an over-engineered dispenser. There are always going to be fundamental tradeoffs with dispensers.
-
-
being Rugged isn't a fun tradeoff
-
I agree. But it’s like saying, “I don’t like getting stabbed in back alleys buying heroin”… sort of par for the course
-
Is there a visual tutorial on using btc pay similar to the video where someone drops 20 BTC to buy the winklevos card? -
lol
- 16 June 2023 (47 messages)
-
I mean I like this in theory.
The scammer would have to work with the node operator to scam? -
Because dispensers are often created at a new address I believe an existing solution lies with being able to see which address funded it. If the source is a known community member then the buyer can rest assured.
To the best of my knowledge there is no easy way for the end user to determine who funded a dispenser at a new address.
One would think the information should be readily available as to where the funding came from by looking at a counterparty explorer. -
This will slide the scale toward transparency and inherently slide it away from anonymity. Much like most options, but this seems a little bit better than a centralized list of good addresses
-
https://forums.counterparty.io/t/solutions-to-rugspenser-problem/6623
I believe the only protocol solution should be:
Small pre-payment -> dispenser gets reserved -> make full payment.
This will virtually eliminate all risk for buyer.
Trusted dispensers etc are ok as 3rd party solutions but too messy to be in the core code. Trust is an endless cat and mouse game.Solutions to "rugspenser" problemAttack vector: Scammer detects incoming buy and immediately sends another buy transaction with a higher fee. The scammer’s tx gets priority and the legit buyer loses his bitcoins. Possible solutions: 1. Pre-payment before full payment This requires a protocol change. The logic is simple. If less than a full dispense is detected, allow up to 12 blocks for the second tx. Perfectly safe as the protocol keeps the token on escrow. The buyer, if not trusting the seller, can thus make a tiny pre-pa...
-
block Explorers do show this
https://xchain.io/tx/e4bfe56d3095c747bdef49aeaaa8f8976a911b49b6c6beeaa356e5481a25ce30 ids a dispernnser selling xcp
https://blockstream.info/tx/e4bfe56d3095c747bdef49aeaaa8f8976a911b49b6c6beeaa356e5481a25ce30?expand shows it was opened by same address it operates omBlockstream Block ExplorerBlockstream Explorer is an open source block explorer providing detailed blockchain data across Bitcoin, Testnet, and Liquid. Supports Tor and tracking-free.
-
here is one opening on a new address
https://blockstream.info/tx/3d76fbec3884f0708cd009aec75cc6a358f6900f6c777d9c50b5a9f8f90c0a90?expand
segwit address opening dispenser on legacy addressBlockstream Block ExplorerBlockstream Explorer is an open source block explorer providing detailed blockchain data across Bitcoin, Testnet, and Liquid. Supports Tor and tracking-free.
-
i like this idea and think the number of blocks allowed for the second payment to arrive could be as much as 99 blocks if the 'sale's locked in by the first
-
XCP getting cheaper again :)
-
I have been researching the history and functions of BTCpay and I do hope this is in the tutorials and FAQ soon with a heavy amount of information, history and discussion on pro's and cons of this feature
-
@jdogresorg Gm ser, I have sent you a dm. Thanks in advance. -
I think this solution desincentivate scammers. And also if there is front running here which I doubt the buyer wont lose a lot of money. Great proposal!
-
Yeah mee too. Been digging a lot and have to do some test.
-
-
LoL
-
I am unable to determine the legacy address in this transaction data. How do I go, as someone naturally would, from the dispenser address back to the financier?
This very thing should be a native one click-link to verify.
End users cannot be expected to know to decipher third party websites in order to determine something specific to this project. -
the legacy address in the transaction is visible on counterparty explorers such as xchain and xcp.dev , its not shown on more traditional block explorers. Xchain doesn't show the opening address just the legacy address xcp.dev is perhaps a better resource when it comes to dispenser data
https://www.xcp.dev/tx/3d76fbec3884f0708cd009aec75cc6a358f6900f6c777d9c50b5a9f8f90c0a90
https://xchain.io/tx/3d76fbec3884f0708cd009aec75cc6a358f6900f6c777d9c50b5a9f8f90c0a90 -
I not sure what you mean 3rd party websites ... counterparty has no official explorer
-
Insurance from rugpensers is probably one of the good solutions in the short term to clear up this space from scams -
-
you are in the RUGSPENSERS now lol
-
Hear me out with trustspensers insurance fund and if that’s horseshit tell me
-
What we need is to have dispensers owners to put collateral into the fund
-
And get trustspenser subasset on the balance
-
Need RUGSPENSERS too
-
This subasset will signal a buyer that trustspenser is legit, and if there is a front run or other rugging there is enough collateral in the fund to compensate
-
Trustspensers insurance will be bought back by the fund at any time, so dispenser owner can get his collateral back minus the service fee which we can use to fund service development and xcp development
-
For dispenser owners there is a hurdle of getting the insurance, but we can get dispenser market back from scammers
-
Fund wallet can be multisig with someone reliable from the community
-
And I can build this stuff with my own funds if this idea is accepted by the community
-
Just tired of rugspensers
-
Not a huge fan of the pre payment. It does add a lot of hassle and double TXs
-
Such a huge opp for a stablecoin on XCP
-
Would bring so many people here
-
Pre payment would be optional.
Sure, not worth the hassle for a $100 card. -
Hello i did a bit of a writing on how to use the DEX for buying and sell (using BTC), this is a draft to the tutorial. I used all the resources I found + a personal exercise of buying and selling. Can you check if you find anything wrong? Also for doing it with BTC, its that using BTCpay? if thats the case how can I do this? (Confirm the payment: Click on the notification, then click "BTCpay" to complete the transaction.) Thank you all! https://medium.com/@rarestamp/counterparty-dex-tutorial-trading-tokens-and-using-btcpay-d539cfed68c
-
Is the counterparty Dex only allow to buy/sell Token? Can you place buy / sell order for STAMPS? -
Yes. -
All CounterParty assets available on the dex.
-
How would someone place a buy order for a specific stamps?
-
freewallet - exchange tab - search for market -
TOKENA/TOKENB
If no orders found create the market buy placing a buy or sell order -
oops sorry best goto stamps for more info
-
For Stamp, you can only sell using a dispenser. Can you sell your stamp on the counterparty DEX?
-
wont let me read it without setting up a medium account - maybe instead reformat it to github gist? or some other way to publish the draft?
-
Im out now, but Will share a docs tomorrow. Sorry for that
-
💚
-
no worries excited to read it
- 17 June 2023 (36 messages)
-
-
noice
-
take a look at https://github.com/jdogresorg/counterparty2mysqlGitHub - jdogresorg/counterparty2mysql: PHP script that populates a MySQL database with Counterparty data
PHP script that populates a MySQL database with Counterparty data - jdogresorg/counterparty2mysql
-
@jdogresorg series 1 of rarebobo.com has been launched and we're looking forward to having a green bar for verification
https://t.me/rareboboOGsRare BoboThe Rarest Bear Market Collectable.
-
-
-
Modern Relics (@ModernRelics_io) on X
Some entries have already been coming in for the next round of July assets - @CounterpartyXCP PSYCHO and @DogepartyXDP BLACKHAT on https://t.co/DYBmiMFzMX Will be picking winners on Monday July 3rd - looking forward to seeing what all our contributing artists will come up with!
-
RudeRelics (@RudeRelics) on X
Spicy entries already been coming in for the next round of July assets @CounterpartyXCP HEROIN and @DogepartyXDP ORGASMIC on https://t.co/k9T4W9VdK7 Picking winners on Monday July 3rd - looking forward to seeing what all our degen artists will come up with!
-
anyone having issues sending btc using freewallet -
I can't sweep atm -
Yeah same mate, I opened a post on github a few weeks ago, i think jdogg is going to sort it soon
-
-
If you used a service. You must wait for it to be sent out to your wallet.
-
AFAIK Xchain working fine… you issued n transferred ownership in same tx… so asset ownership is in different wallet than balances https://xchain.io/tx/a4d1a4f6872b88dc117122dfd6bde867fd18d2df1c4856b80a3ca5c5a9d4d2b5
-
Still getting this error, does anyone have any clue what it could be? I have tried restarting laptop, fw is upto date, tried changing servers etc.
-
Ive tried sending from another addy on the same wallet both getting the same error and both have more than enough btc. Not much dust in either
-
-
Have this settings sir?
-
Broadcasting is address specific issue not a cp issue… try using electrum to gather your utxos
-
Ive just sweeped the addy, Still getting the error. It was working fine last night
-
I can send assets though , Is BTC different ?
-
strange been trying all day and now its just started working
-
Having an issue with multisend. It keeps capitalizing the letters in the address and giving me invalid address error -
Anyone else having or had this issue before?
-
Never heard of that issue before
-
ikr. I dm you pics. I'm going to uninstall and reinstall when I get back to my laptop
-
Coldie hacked, stay sharp
-
-
Can't sweep either. Someone else also got this issue @jdogresorg
-
Sweep is known issue which will be fixed in next release
-
Sweep not working · Issue #128 · jdogresorg/freewallet-desktop
Sweep not working on updated freewallet Version 0.9.23
- 18 June 2023 (4 messages)
-
Submissions open.
Bring the Swan
https://t.me/RareSwan -
Anybody know why a BTC send from freewallet to coinbase would be unconfirmed/pending for 3+ days? More importantly, is here anything that can be done? -
SORCERERAKAM 0.024 Btc :
https://xchain.io/tx/db9b3931a5aa5578725acbdc587e6313328cbe9c167a9ed8eb5a9f6cd355fcba - 19 June 2023 (12 messages)
-
Hey anyone here knows whats wrong with the cp api today?
I keep getting KeyError in the response when I manually send a create_issuance, it only started today and nothing has changed from my side -
Anyone here to help me shed some light on this?
-
Been getting server error.
-
Yeh man. You too?
-
Windows Application hasn't given me an issue
-
There is absolutely someone more qualified than me to answer this eventually, but in my search on forums.counterparty.io for "KeyError" I found this. Feel free to search for more documentation but this is what I could find quickly that points to a similar error: https://forums.counterparty.io/t/default-error-at-fednode-install-full-master/5386/2Default error at fednode install full master
Hi, first post: I am doing a, fednode install full master on Ubuntu1604. First error in fednode.py was the logname which I changed to whoami. Next error is the following: Traceback (most recent call last): File “/usr/lib/python3.6/configparser.py”, line 1138, in _unify_values sectiondict = self._sections[section] KeyError: ‘Default’ During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: Traceback (most recent call last): File “/usr/local/bin/fednode”, line 464, in main() ...
-
Im on windows. Tried with postman and also fetch API, same error.
-
Only started happening today
-
Gotchya, it may be something to post about on the forums or mention to someone in the Counterparty Dev chat to see if any other users are getting the same issue
-
Official Counterparty Dev Chat
Group for discussion about Counterparty based development Github: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/ Docs: https://docs.counterparty.io/
-
Saw this in my socials today it was a poster for someones meditation business but thought I would share the image as it made me think of communities as a whole everyone dealing with these times of triblation. At least we have each other Pepe's Bobo's , Bitcorns, Shadi's', Swans and Ordinals, and Bitcorns alike. Neo
- 20 June 2023 (13 messages)
-
I´ve publish this article for using the DEX, specially using BTC. I´ve added some warnings about the fact that the wallet needs to be open to complete the order when using BTC. Let me know if you find anything incorrect and I´ll change it. Did my best effort with the docs and feedbacks I got. https://medium.com/@rarestamp/counterparty-dex-tutorial-trading-tokens-and-using-btcpay-d539cfed68c
-
-
Having a funny issue with btc tx fee through freewallet. High fee does not seem to be matching up very well with the vb of the send. I sent some btc from 1 wallet to another and used custom fee rate of double the high fee and it ended up in the mem pool at 5 sats per vb and 5 inputs. Did some sends of assets at high priority and fee rate came out way over high fee in the mem pool. Kinda confused. -
fee is an estimate based on average send size... will work to get better fee estimation in freewallet when I get a chance... but, its up to you to figure out what fee you should send things at... dont depend on high/low/medium settings and suggested fees if you want something sent fast, or slower 👍️️️️️️
-
Wow!!! Beautiful!!!
-
-
Thank jdog. It is kinda hard to estimate vb without the ability to see what the weight of the tx is going to be.
-
Can someone explain this smooth brain question.
Why 5 inputs fir 1 btc send from wallet to wallet.
Just fir my own knowledge. Thanks. -
Very well explained. Thanks Fren
-
Nevermind all fixed. That was ridiculous
- 21 June 2023 (48 messages)
-
how many blocks need to be confirmed for a btc/xcp dex trade to confirm? -
Takes me 1. Confirms and swaps. Wallet might take a minute to reflect
-
-
why does this look so weird
-
if you click on pending tab seems to be for an asset
-
but i wanted just straight xcp to btc swap
-
100 XCP available at 16500 sats per XCP.
So 0.0165 BTC for 100 XCP.
DM @RarePepeTrader to deal.
Also join @XCPDESK for other XCP Bids and Asks. -
this is a BTCpay transaction on the XCP dex with the BTC pair - recently an FAQ was written about using that feature here: https://medium.com/@rarestamp/counterparty-dex-tutorial-trading-tokens-and-using-btcpay-d539cfed68c
-
It is easiest to use a Dispenser to acquire XCP in many users opinions
-
Alright but have you taken a look at that tx? I generally use dispensers but I saw a nice buy order I wanted to match
-
basically whats going is the person who put up the tx to sell BTC did it 24 days ago as shown if you click the information for the order tx which is here: https://xchain.io/tx/2399463 - they have 20 blocks to send the BTC or else the order is not filled which is why it is labelled as "pending"
-
-
Actually this tx looks strange to me as it is showing "PEPEXADIDAS" as the asset
-
I do see what you mean on how confusing that is, the https://xchain.io/tx/2399463 is what was prompted when I clicked "view"
-
Yeah very weird
-
is that 1Mkr address yours? it is just showing the wrong info when clicking "view"?
-
No
-
I'm 13XHZYIDP7POUVNQU7JCPWV9JW9JJEDTZP
-
Did I mess up . I'm selling xcp
-
cool I understand the tx info more now. And I checked for this order on BTC/XCP open orders and dont see it. At the moment on xchain I'm seeing that as a pending order match from 2 hours ago from the address 1Mkr6w2pnzxSsP6TyoLBn4iB2aHsgQzJmc, though when I'm looking at the buyers address on blockstream I'm not seeing the TX from two hours ago
-
It could mean that the BTCpay function has not been triggered yet for some reason, which can mean that the buyer has not sent the funds yet
-
The buyer is required to keep their wallet open to see a notification for a second transaction (if they selected Manual and not Automatic for their BTCpay buy tx) and they have 20 blocks to do so.
-
TY
-
I am not an employee, just an enthusiastic community member. I am just trying to help users here out the kindness of my heart. I am doing a couple test BTCpay transactions right now using Automatic pay as the buyer and the Manual pay to fish out the whole process and make sure I can use this feature correctly with Freewallet v0.9.23
-
So I tested the BTC/RAREAIRDROP exchange market with BTCpay on Freewallet v0.9.23 and filled an open order (to match) with the Automatic setting which sent out this tx: https://xchain.io/tx/a16f472eda1eb683e2a1b050153cd59da5e7e02269a1709bcdd953e8b7a15f66 , then I did the Manual function and got this tx: https://xchain.io/tx/ce6450163879e92403527859a30d2f6783f06efddafba18e99771068c29d1ea6
From the user side of things it seems that the first Auto-pay setting for BTCpay didnt "automatically" work. For the second tx (which was the Manual setting) I was instructed with the information I have seen to leave Freewallet open (locked is ok) and wait for a pop up to confirm the second transaction/broadcast. I have not seen anything yet even though both tx's are confirmed and showing on xchain as "open." Is there some instruction I am missing here or does it seem BTCpay may be bugged on v0.9.23? -
If anyone has Freewallet v0.9.22 or earlier running I'd love to know if you are having the same issue
-
Also @jdogresorg if I was to document this further what is the most productive way to do so? Would the Debug feature be useful here?
-
I once told a boss I was calling in well. She was confused, so explained it was like the opposite of a sick day. I said I’m far too well to come into work today. It turned out to be my last day.
-
Kek . Like a boss
-
-
Gm, a mistake happened in my freewallet, sub-asset mint with only 7.5sat/vb stuck for more than 24h now. - re-issuing at higher tx in fw prints broadcast error. btcnitro minimum for fee bump is 11sat/vb, rebroadcasting afaik. pointless as mempool back up at 17sat/vb
What‘s the way to go with such to not have addy stuck until tx is dismissed in what is it, around two weeks? Thanks for hints. 🙏🏼 -
use cpfp
-
you may find electrum a better choice when it comes to coin control
-
child pays for parent with sparrow or electrum you mean? I‘ve used electrum before to send an amount to myself with super high fees but did not always work.
-
yeah cpfp is sweet
-
I never know it not work, just be sure to include the parent you want confirmed, over compensate on the fee n it will be mined
-
need to learn how to cpfp in electrum, not sure if I know how that works.
-
if you got p2ms data encoding in parent know the sigops works against you n some patience may be needed
subassets trigger p2ms data encoding if description is long enough -
Gotcha, cpfp executed on tx. waiting now.
-
Hope I am doing this right, this is what it should look like isn‘t it? don‘t mind the size (11.82mb) it‘s jumping around in electrum, in blockstream dot info size is 864 B
-
confirmed. cpfp indeed works well like that, thanks.
on another address i have a stamp mint stuck. happened even though 23sat/vb, send to myself @ 35sat/vb. Now bumped parent to 56sat/vb and hope it works.
need to learn more about how to not get stamp tx‘s stuck despite enough initial sat/vb.
in the past I used btcnitro for those sometimes but the 15ish dollars suck. -
Good to hear it worked. These txs with lots of p2ms outputs have the highest sigops scores you can get so they not mined in a hurry
-
Ok I am just trying to find a workflow where I can halfway rely on stamp minting times by paying decent fees but not overpaying by several hundred percents. Atm. for me when I mint a stamp on freewallet it's like I'll wait mostly several days despite sat/vb seems reasonably high, do cpfp, use btcnitro and this is a bit a bummer because the wallet can't really do any other transactions until it's all confirmed. Assume it could also have to do with the multisig dustsize reduction down to 0.000025 (from default 0.000078) but still learning.
-
I do not think the dust size has an effect but maybe a miner can educate us better
-
trying to send out btc from FW. 1st addy i sent from gave broadcast error. switched to a different addy and was able to send a chunk, then tried to send another chunk and got same broadcast error. any suggestions? using xchain.io for api host. also tried host2.xchain.io. -
getting this in the debug console: Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()
-
"This version of the API is invalid or is no longer available. For API V3 documentation, see https://chain.so/api."
- 22 June 2023 (9 messages)
-
There a pr in that updates the failover (I’m also hitting this a lot)
-
So I've been working together with @blockjack8 to develop a perfect FAQ for BTCpay for users using Freewallet v0.9.23. He and I dug into the forums, github, asked in dev chat and counterparty chat about this process. We are trying to hash this out for users to make it the most smooth process and easy for anybody new to Counterparty. Both Angel and I haven't used BTCpay before, so we both thought we would test the process.
Angel threw up a test BTC/RAREAIRDROP market and we got some help early on from @al_fernandz , in which Al successfully filled his BTCpay order here: https://xchain.io/tx/2428927
It was Al's experience that this simply "filled automatically" when he made sure to keep Auto BTCpay in the ON setting when making the BTCpay order. Which was completed and filled. He is also using v0.9.23.
Angel and I also then tried to do the same process, but our orders never automatically filled even though the market had open sell orders that should have automatically matched for us to buy with btc. It was strange because we did not have the same experience as Al.
I went even farther to try filling the order on the Auto setting (https://xchain.io/tx/2429910) and the Manual setting which I expected some sort of popup while keeping Freewallet open (https://xchain.io/tx/2429937). No fills. No popup at that time.
I took a break after many hours of nothing "automatically happening" and the next day I would eventually close and restart my Freewallet to see these two popups:
"Enable Auto-BTC pay?" - which it then asked for my password (just the one I created in Freewallet to lock my account, which is normal for unlocking Freewallet for other functions)
Then it popped up a statement "Auto BTCpay is now enabled and any order matches for BTC will be automatically paid"
So I thought, okay, why not try again? I used Auto BTC pay setting again assuming it should work now (https://xchain.io/tx/2430021). Still no luck. No order matches like Al's tx did , still not "working" from my user experience. Even stranger, Angel nor Al every saw these "Auto-BTCpay" popups.
In Angel's and my experience, BTCpay function is not working correctly for us in v0.9.23
So Al recently did a little experiment today. He tried (as Angel and I did) putting in a BUY order for buying 1 RAREAIRDROP for 0.002 BTC (as it SHOULD match the sell/buy list already open on the RAREAIRDROP/BTC market) - https://xchain.io/tx/e3e9b1ccaa1f1cc71478651e0e660eda98d52a64809190286158e3b7b686a1a1
Al also then put in a SELL order for 0.001 for 5 RAREAIRDROP to test the other direction of the trade - https://xchain.io/tx/ff6408b1da973a7f18256d391d0bc658b08d53329522f80f1e8dd884b96035a0
Now it looks like neither of the two new tx's from Al have matched correctly. So now I'm gonna stop wrapping my head around this and look into making other FAQ's for other functions. This will need to be sorted out before Angel and I can successfully write an FAQ on this subject.
Please anyone that is very familiar with BTCpay can you check this function out in v0.9.23? @jdogresorg , @c0rnh0li0 , @hodlencoinfield
Anything I can do from my end txs/debug I will gladly do but with my technical knowledge I am at an absolute standstill and cannot test or use this function. -
Just to clarify this issue is now being discussed here: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/cips/discussions/96
Also, this function can be tested on the Bitcoin Core (Testnet)Lower Requirement to Trigger BTCpay Order Match from 0.001 BTC to Something Lower · CounterpartyXCP/cips · Discussion #96Below is a test process I used, along with help from @Blockjack8 and @al_fernandz to try to use the BTCpay function using Freewallet v0.9.23 and we found orders were not matching with BTC orders un...
-
Sorry for the delayed reply. I ended up using electrum to send the corn. Haven't had a chance to come back to FW and see if it's still an issue. Thanks v much for taking the time to help! Will give those things a try if needed.
- 23 June 2023 (12 messages)
-
Soon.
-
Guys, want to check another trustpensers idea with you. How about a TG bot or something where anyone can associate dispensers with his TG handle. In this case ppl can verify with bot before buying if there is a known contact in case of dispute. If dispute happens and not solved, all trustpensers of that TG handle will turn into rugspensers and ppl will know that and further rugs will be prevented in these addresses. As a heavy user of dispensers I hope to make them great again.
-
Henlo, can I ask is there a way to cancel unconfirmed transaction on btc chain mempool? TIA -
I usually send a small amount to the same wallet address with a higher than normal gas fee to cancel or make it go faster the unconfirmed transaction. I don't know if there are better ways. -
🐸 𝗥𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗣𝗘𝗣𝗘𝗦 🐸
No Reserve Auctions Next Week
PEPEARTHUR 🐸 PEPENAPOLEON 🐸 PEPEMOTHRA -
-
-
a good site to see Rare Pepe price history and determine rarity is pepe.wtf
-
You can review and add the the discussion here on that topic that JPJA started a couple weeks ago: https://forums.counterparty.io/t/solutions-to-rugspenser-problem/6623Solutions to "rugspenser" problem
Attack vector: Scammer detects incoming buy and immediately sends another buy transaction with a higher fee. The scammer’s tx gets priority and the legit buyer loses his bitcoins. Possible solutions: 1. Pre-payment before full payment This requires a protocol change. The logic is simple. If less than a full dispense is detected, allow up to 12 blocks for the second tx. Perfectly safe as the protocol keeps the token on escrow. The buyer, if not trusting the seller, can thus make a tiny pre-pa...
- 24 June 2023 (99 messages)
-
Hey all!
I'm looking to find individual or packs of CP NFTs created in April 2014 or earlier.
Anyone got a good link or place to fish around? -
Thanks to IndelibleTrade for helping me w this 🙏🙏🙏
-
Sock Account
-
Sock Account
-
No they're not, unless you've developed a particularly nasty case of Oedipal Potty Mouth recently
-
This had me dying 🤣
-
SONSOFSOCKS
-
It's the Sockular Economy
-
What one sock giveth, another taketh away
-
well, it's funny, because I really thought these were all you :)
-
Midi Mi Di Ci ? :)
-
whoever it is, they are very dedicated to harvesting giveaways... they're joining over 20 groups in grouped waves and claiming whatever they can, fast on the paste from multiple accounts
-
Most of the addresses have been mapped to an array of your assets
-
so it's strange they're so fixated on sharing your assets around
-
It's the unifying factor
-
-
-
I'm just saying, that's not the reason all those accounts using the same addresses all hold sets of your assets.
not playing, just saying.
I'll leave it here for now, got work to do. -
More like bad farts -
Liar
-
it's touching how you care for LBB's health
-
You need a whole team of them
-
I know you are but what am i
-
This isn't cool for the official Counterparty group... I came in pointing out some sock accounts, that's all... sorry I got into a bit of to and fro, it's just got silly now
-
Peace Out
-
I was pointing out you're a liar
-
You exist as proof
-
See another lie
-
can I just point out to you both, there are nearly 2000 other people in here who don't need to see this or scroll through it
-
Everyone should be aware of a socky scammer
-
All 2000 of you
-
Liars should be pointed at and mocked relentlessly
-
Fraud is the worst of sin
-
Be that as it may, it's important to respect the attention and bandwidth of others who are not in any way involved in the issues
-
-
Disengaged
-
-
-
why does that always remind me of a dildo
-
you clearly live an interesting life
-
there have been some interesting moments
-
-
mostly its just spreadsheets
-
-
-
we have six X 30 minute pop-ups starting in @WTHAuctionHouse in six minutes, followed by a 21 Lot auction culminating in a chance to bid on RAREPEPE, starting from 22:00 UTC
-
we also have the ENTIRE supply and ownership of a Rare Pepe at Lot 19!
-
Okay, the first of our six scheduled 30 minute No Reserve Pop Ups is now live in https://t.me/wthauctionhouse/189492
-
anyone care for a bargain zone PEPESUMO?
Bidding is still under $100 in @WTHAuctionHouse right now!!
https://pepe.wtf/asset/PEPESUMOPEPESUMO | Pepe.wtfDiscover the universe of Rare Pepes in Pepe.wtf
-
Active Dispensers:
BTC: 0.00250000
USD: $76.36 ($76.36/card)
Give: 1
Left: 3/3
Disp link - 25 June 2023 (71 messages)
-
python-telegram-bot -
𝐏𝐄𝐏𝐄 & 𝐅𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐬
𝑅𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑃𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑠 🐸 𝐹𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝑅𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 🐸 𝐹𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑠
Auctions drop TUESDAY
📎https://scarce.city/collections/pepe-and-frens-18 -
Hey!
I have a question - is cancelling a dispenser a quick operation, if done with high priority?
It took ~1,5-2 days for dispenser to appear, so definitely not sure how long it might take to cancel it 😹 -
It takes one network confirmation
-
Got it, thanks
-
Florida
12Bq1XhEkLh61kYzaPgi3W9bh6bYEyutDW
Thank you -
Florida 😊
19RfaWiQnoqkmbUSDosKymg4mALrNbN13p -
😂
-
California 🥲
19RfaWiQnoqkmbUSDosKymg4mALrNbN13p -
Thanks pepeflags
-
I will send you a NANOKAMOTO for thanks bro 😎
-
New York
15gweUcWW21ikh2dhSwLEztUX5cZuZ5DHm -
Another n00b question - could anyone suggest a proper way to sell thru dispensers? I mean - not by using a special platform.
Is there any guides around? -
Not yet, thanks, will check out!
The problem is - i already have some assets in dispensers on xcp and have no idea how this works on counterparty :) -
138kNmWCdJxGUGUxMzgcjMpHVhqGaDrh1k North Carolina -
At the moment I am drafting some rough FAQs for this function so please hold as I will post them in a beautiful formatted way on GitHub to be reviewed intensely by the community. As for now your best bet for Dispenser tutorials is robotlovescoffee tutorials: https://youtu.be/EmV_xAf-nRA as well as Rarepepesdotcom tutorials: https://youtu.be/wYNeaIUip8M
-
Thanks, will check out
-
I'll take a Maine.
13re7J5Y5a8nZZSp8o1a3sEUqGik4NMXhS -
𝗕𝗜𝗧𝗖𝗢𝗜𝗡𝗦𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗗 🔈
𝑃𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑛 𝐶𝑎𝑛𝑣𝑎𝑠
by @TIZARBERANDALAN
No Reserve Auction
TUESDAY
📎https://scarce.city/auctions/bitcoinsound -
Can people who participated in Kaleidoscope participate here too? -
Washington
13j9aWM7hAJCgpFq2uWPUtJ36ZiCX139DG -
128zVMFZ9VJJ9ZFTzQ7xDUMyTEaafH6ZfS Hawaii, Wyoming or Washington are so good! Any of this ;)
-
wyoming then!
-
in the future move this to the XCP Shill/ Faucet chat as to make the addy spam easier on everyone looking here for counterparty support : https://t.me/xcpfaucet
-
-
1NJPeyMbFGwVsnPx7tojBpA6UGWt1n5uBr 🥶Minnesota -
Or maybe they don't read anything other than "giveaway"
Drop Addy first and ask questions after -
1Dh6Rnb2we1opNQCbQMWT9VrFziBySpeA3
Illinois -
1866tuqUy65SuTadWpSFZt7NiHybUF4B7k
Montana -
14udFRS6AdnQNJZn9RZ1H3LtSqP7k2UeTC
New York -
Texas
-
?
-
Think 4 letter states ;)
-
UTAH
-
1MKLSimtqUuHXY37PHybkDBFQxJrCUdBUZ
Wisconsin -
14ZW6dDDbgn9vqqwYm9Ab87uaMZCbnFqL3
Alaska please n thanks -
Wisconsin
-
1Mqy489eEPBLn5P3ZjZJ1ZsDyLdGioSsaE
ARIZONA -
bc1qn3wjnxl4vxuy3fe7n6464kpctw3ljnwre26ygu
Georgia ty
Official Counterparty Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 Jun 2023 (62)
- 02 Jun 2023 (91)
- 03 Jun 2023 (58)
- 04 Jun 2023 (42)
- 05 Jun 2023 (42)
- 06 Jun 2023 (47)
- 07 Jun 2023 (78)
- 08 Jun 2023 (12)
- 09 Jun 2023 (59)
- 10 Jun 2023 (2)
- 11 Jun 2023 (11)
- 12 Jun 2023 (9)
- 13 Jun 2023 (17)
- 14 Jun 2023 (33)
- 15 Jun 2023 (97)
- 16 Jun 2023 (47)
- 17 Jun 2023 (36)
- 18 Jun 2023 (4)
- 19 Jun 2023 (12)
- 20 Jun 2023 (13)
- 21 Jun 2023 (48)
- 22 Jun 2023 (9)
- 23 Jun 2023 (12)
- 24 Jun 2023 (99)
- 25 Jun 2023 (71)
- 26 Jun 2023 (202)
- 27 Jun 2023 (385)
- 28 Jun 2023 (111)
- 29 Jun 2023 (26)
- 30 Jun 2023 (26)