- 12 December 2023 (85 messages)
-
Technical Specification | CounterpartyRead API Function Reference
-
-
1 + 2 = 3
-
So flags in a good sense, not in a bad one. Perfect. -
Sweep tokens w/o ownership = 1
-
Maths
-
If I ever have to flea the country, I can take my pepes with me. Anyone have a condom and a long piece of string I can borrow?
-
Yes, I made my own custom lock screen
-
so cool ser -
This little bugger has $5 of BTC and $362m of jpgs on it (as reported by xchain).
- 13 December 2023 (143 messages)
-
3F? -
Yep, funding would be great, do you have any ideas that might appeal to the WeChat BTNS users?
-
Could you elaborate? Is their institutional involvement in the BTNS party over there?
-
That all sounds pretty good.
Are the BTNS users well informed about CP/XCP?
It seems like with your language skills and understanding of these markets you could help spread awareness and get more people involved (and hopefully more funding). -
-
Indeed, good day to us all -
dispensers
-
-
click dispensers tab... green = open / selling xcp
-
DYOR
-
Let’s get this party started (Counterparty ❤️🎉)
-
https://t.me/xcpdesk
This should be a good place to find safe (verified) dispensers. As an experiment try grabbing a few xcp from a verified dispenser. -
We need to get xcp more widely circulating
-
Vivek⚡️ (@Vivek4real_) on X
The Federal Reserve is nothing federal and has no reserves. They rob you from your wealth and from your savings and that’s immoral. It’s not only immoral but it also destroys some basic economic principles like saving.” - @nayibbukele Opt-out with #Bitcoin
-
Won't be surprised if taproot script lengths are eventually limited, although that would just mess with large inscriptions, not BRC-20.
-
Holy sh1te it sounds like the wechat bros have not even heard of XCP 😭😭😭
-
-
Xiaobo and Xcer, U guys gotta get in there and spread the gospel
-
Lei-Ge,
I've just dropped by the Xchain Counterparty WeChat group a few times, and it seems that quite a few of the members have never heard of XCP.
Are they now engaged in trading/investing that has no connection to counterparty and XCP, or do you think it would benefit them to understand counterparty and XCP? -
I'm guessing there are not many or any Chinese language introductions to Counterparty and XCP.
And many of the English ones are rather out of date. Not sure how to put the word out....... -
What is opendime?
-
Yes this is a problem, docs are really outdated
-
Wattup yall was doing some digging around and found this collection called “age of rust” any details on what this was about ? -
-
7 years old
-
I've saw them in the WTHD auction -
Yea doing some digging see it’s a PC game too
-
Any idea if the asset is viable or useful in game?
-
Looks like they are using polygon now for the game
-
Reading the FAQs in epic games launcher
-
Then I think that yes of course
-
As any other wallet
-
I have no clue. My bet would be it didn't pan out
-
Word ima keep digging good looks!
-
yeah and satscard will work too -
Scarecity item featuring opendime
https://scarce.city/marketplace/physical/PEPENATION-displayPEPENATION DisplayAn online marketplace for Bitcoin goods and Bitcoin NFTs
-
Nice! I always saw those lil usb sticks and was curious bout them. Thanks for the clarification
-
-
the point was that bitcoin stamps wanted to be just needed bitcoin to mint to be able to reach more people and easier to explain
-
cant speak to that... or rather.. dont want to cause unecessary drama.. we're past the drama now... no desire to revisit it... but, if you care to review for yourself... here is the link to the message where I drop the XCP Fee PR in CP dev channel... after that, you can read for yourself. https://t.me/Counterparty_Dev/6428J-Dog in Official Counterparty Dev Chat
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/cips/blob/master/cip-0029.md
-
problems started with src20 that dont uses the cp features such as dispener or supply as they are tracked and transfer on another layer similar to ordinals brc20 and btns
-
i think im talking to you with respect if is not reciproque i wont talk again no need to hear you with this kind of words
-
what exists for you dude?
-
realistic under your point of view
-
working on releasing and open source indexer for stamps ecosistem
-
why?
-
i am not grifting anyone
-
are you right that data in ordinals are not used to generate the hash?
-
and that lives in a part of the block not needed to recreate the whole blockchain?
-
are you right with me that 85% of nfts in ethereum has the image in centralized servers?
-
this is what we called them unprunables bc the comparation is with ordinals
-
in centralized servers and running on thousend of nodes at the moment
-
maybe there is a copy on arweave too and for sure there are copies on ipfs
-
this is your point of view and is not about just jpegs, important documents can be stored onchain
-
okey ser and what are you doing?
-
this conv wont go anyway and i dont like how you talk so ciao bella
-
Im not grifting anyone, i dont like src20 neither, i dont hold any of them as i dont like shitcoins but i like perdurability, and posiblities of decentralized assets with all the information on chain, this is why im here, i like counterparty also a good platform to learn and experiment and hopefully a good place to contribute code that is what i really love but im trying to understand why are you telling this is a grift bc i dont understand what is the difference between this and the pepe you have as pfp, stored in the same protocol but with a centralized service holding the image
-
and src20 now are shitcoins until some people start giving them utility like everything but if there is not building there is not possible utility
-
im willing someone gives them utility i know there are daos proposal to be based on it so im expectating on that
-
no ser for stamps not src is not the same
-
So how about those MPMA transactions folks? -
-
😉
-
-
-
not me ser i wasnt so involved at that moment but i think was propossed to do a retroactive burn of xcp for all the stamps minted if im not wrong that was desestimated but i hadnt any word at this moment on it
-
Also src20 are not in counterparty anymore so dont be worry of them is not your problem anymore. And for your info at the opensource indexer there are named stamps too (and they have paid the xcp fee to issue with the minners fee to embeed all the data in bitcoin ledger) i am the one who is more pushing and building to make named stamps available as i told you i dont mind how to create them i mind the art on chain forever in the biggest chain. THE END
-
they didnt but in the case they would like to do it they were in their right to do it, are you blaming etc or bsv or bitcoin cash or doge or mariadb or open nextjs or any other thousand of opensource protocol that has forked when some changes didnt like a part of the people using it?
-
anyway i see xcp fee like a payment to have the name you want for your asset, in most protocols there is a free tier where you cant choose your domain and they assign you one random, hard to remember and with nosense names so if there is a reason to put a xcp fee on numericals i dont see a reason for them to exist
-
tbf without the full support of @hodlencoinfield and @jdogresorg from day 1 stamps wouldn't have existed the first place.
It was certainly offered to retroactively burn XCP tokens for prior minted stamps if you read the history. However all the mentioned parties didn't care about XCP price, and didn't hold any sizable bags so that was never pursued. The fear of potential database growth outweighed any benefits of XCP burn at that point. If stamps are a grift then the entire CP ecosystem is a grift by that measure.
Nothing here is 'screwing' the XCP community out of anything. Perhaps it even sped up some dev work and features that got pushed out that benefitted everyone (albeit imo a little rushed, but good stuff) - all credit due to Jdog and Javier.
What's the point of stirring up drama that is behind us? Stamps has brought a lot of eyeballs to CP and imo we are growing together. More devs are getting into the CP code, and more public CP nodes are coming online (xcp.dev API, along with a stampchain CP API) for EVERYONE to use for free. It's a win for everyone. IF the community at large determines XCP fees are a necessity I'm sure the stamps community will figure out what makes sense IF the time comes. No set plans or expectations either way. -
a great plan to gather consensus from the community on different ideas and to help devs to prioritize
-
i am learning a lot about cp from this indexer adventure and im willing to contribute to protocol
-
So a committee of people organise and create the ideas that the Devs must then bring to life.
Their (the Devs) input shall be limited to "it does/does not work as expected" and fix accordingly. Any problems that may arise will of course be the Devs fault (bad coding naturally) and the nebulous ideas that the Committee seek to bring to life are fine as they are and it's merely a matter of time , say two weeks, before the Devs have fixed everyting to enable the idea to come to life.
If not, the Committee will fire the Devs and start again. - 14 December 2023 (268 messages)
-
devs will always just build what they want to build, a foundation or committee that attempts to dictate code changes is DOA -
small incremental changes are the way to build consensus, and i think despite the arguments and fork risk we've seen in counterparty, cooler heads have always prevailed and we've been able to keep the protocol running relatively stable the last nearly 10 years
-
is it really a committee at that point?
-
the problem we ran into in the past was there was a foundation that accepted donations and then the people donating wanted their voices heard wrt changes in the protocol
-
Agree these shitcoin grifters need to gtfo -
Do these clowns even own any xcp
-
which i can totally understand, but it became a flawed mechanism
-
good ideas will rise to the top, you dont need a committee to decide them
-
im old enough to remember the bitcoin foundation 😁
-
Balance will not be achieved as long as dev's believe themselves to be untouchables. Unfortunate that the most vocal users are unwilling to have an authentic discussion. Yet have the audacity to claim consensus
Anyone is welcome to discuss plans here @xcpfoundation or their own foundation forum. Alas, this is not really the venue for professional discussion. -
Because the market views xcp as a shitcoin. Right or wrong, that's the perception. It's the reason why the common belief is that "Ordinals are the first Bitcoin NFTs" and most Bitcoiners have never heard of Counterparty. Without sounding too grandiose, I believe the marketing tactic we used was hugely successful by every possible metric. My Op-Ed in Bitcoin Magazine drops in the print edition next month. Watch for it. -
-
A lot of fun Counterparty history in the article as well.
-
That's not my job. My job is to launch a successful project not rehabilitate the image of xcp. Sorry, that's not my job.
-
I hold almost zero SRC20. I could care less how it does.
-
I'd prefer it went away, tbh, and the focus returned to the art
-
its true. I didn't mint anything really. I'm much more interested in the art applications like AI Stamps and SRC-721
-
No, like I said, the market wants a pure "Bitcoin" play. That's obvious. Beyond the ideological aspect, its so much easier to onboard when new users don't have to hunt down a token they can just use Bitcoin directly
-
well the art has tokens: counterparty assets. Those are necessary to sell/trade
-
That exists. A lot of people in that ecosystem. I tried to carve out my own little niche. My little fiefdom, if you will.
-
I'm not saying it, the market is saying it. I've been very complimentary about Counterparty. I shit on Ordinals all the time.
-
The reason why XCP is basically immune from pumps and has been the same price for years is because it is a true utility token with the fairest launch possible. And that's OK, that's how it was designed.
-
I’d say there is NO market perception at all vs the perception it’s a shitcoin -
It’s literally mostly unknown by almost everyone in crypto, people deep in crypto
-
That was mulled over substantially and while I do agree with it in principle, the consensus among the devs was that the amount of "spam" being generated because of numeric assets was less of an issue than turning numeric asset users off from Counterparty completely.
-
I guess it comes down to whether you view usage and users as "spam". Most projects would love to have an influx of traffic because there are always ways to monetize that traffic at the edges. But yeah, you can get rid of all the "spam" and have a ghost town like Raretoshi.
-
A broad oversimplification but OK
-
XCP or Counterparty are you referring to?
-
Counterparty isn't going anywhere, there is a small but dedicated community (which I consider myself apart of) that has kept it alive for a decade. Longer than any other token project that I'm aware of. But it is small. Stamps is small, too, btw. Ordinals is Goliath. Ordinals has all the mindshare and devs and marketplaces and modern tooling. Stamps has already brought a little of that to Counterparty. Check out xcp.ninja for instance. That's the result of attracting new devs to Stamps. It's a modern explorer/marketplace/wallet that works really well. Compare that with Counterparty (and I mean no disrespect here) but the tools are very dated and clunky. It scares new users off.
So, yeah, my view is that Stamps is helping Counterparty stay relevant in the wake of Ordinals. -
Here you can actually see Counterparty Collections!
https://xcp.ninja/collections
How cool is that???XCP Ninja, the counterparty reference.Explore a wide range of Counterparty assets through a powerful search engine. Tools such as minting, directories and more.
-
Here's a Leaderboard of all the top addresses and what they hold:
https://xcp.ninja/leaderboard
How cool is that???XCP Ninja, the counterparty reference.Explore a wide range of Counterparty assets through a powerful search engine. Tools such as minting, directories and more.
-
Royalties for the first time on Counterparty. How cool is that???
-
100% its a swiss army knife and it works great on a desktop computer. I love it. But mobile is lacking... I don't think I'm saying anything controversial here, and in 2023 mobile is *critical*
-
bro... its 2023... its just the way it is... some people only have phones... no computer
-
the original rarepepewallet.com was designed with mobile in mind
-
at risk? we're all using hot wallets with freewallet.... I doubt many use HWW
-
i remember arguments with mike because it wasnt a native app
-
and people love native apps
-
Was just about to mention that. The guy who got me into collecting Rare Pepes demo'd it for me, worked like a charm from his phone, and that was years ago.
-
I still love native apps... web apps have a way of losing state so you have to login again constantly...
-
@hodlencoinfield remember that call we had with Bitcoin Magazine... this was probably late 2021/ early 2022.... they were so gung-ho to have a Counterparty presence at their conference, even toying with the idea of a token at entry. But the big sticking point was a lack of mobile support.
-
Its not just hypebois... this is the world... the world has been mobile-first for a decade
-
I mean ultimately if this fork off situation plays out and counterparty maintains supremacy, stamps become bitcoin cash and Mike becomes Roger Ver and we all forget about him by 2026
-
Doesn’t that just make counterparty stronger?
-
Multimillionaire living in St. Kitts? I'll take it.
-
A lot of Ordinals projects are V.C.-backed, which is why a lot of capital has flooded that space. That means capital for development & marketing.
VCs aren't as likely to bother with Counterparty because they want something they can control from the ground up. Which just isn't possible with XCP.
It is what it is. If chasing hype is your thing, there's plenty of avenues through which to do it. Counterparty just isn't as likely to be one of them. -
RIP indiesquare
-
it was such a great wallet
-
Yep I had it for a brief while, did a great job
-
Book of Orbs. Really dug the skeuomorphism
-
yep
-
indiesquare had a way to create assets tho and you could add an icon
-
if only they let you add a whole picture
-
anyone tried this? https://apps.apple.com/us/app/casa-tookan/id1435616326Casa Tookan
Casa Tookan, EverdreamSoft next-generation dual-chain wallet, simplifies the management of your digital assets. This new Bitcoin-Ethereum mobile wallet for blockchain gamers & collectors securely and privately store your digital assets and collections. Your digital estate is protected by a secure 1…
-
does it still work?
-
i remember i downloaded it a while ago
-
still in the app store... idk
-
I found my old IndieSquare wallet address, has 2 of these badboys in it:
https://xchain.io/asset/GUERILLA -
You know what I should download Spells of Genesis and actually play it for once
-
Spells of Genesis uses Tookan
-
You have to send BITCRYSTALS to it in order to transfer your blockchainzed cards out to your ETH or counterparty wallet
-
I think I have some bitcrystals somewhere
-
Speaking of old CP wallets, I just stumbled upon this while doing something else... @jp_janssen was always ahead of the game
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9mUWeXpaocCounterTools Spells of Genesis EditionCounterTools SoG is a Counterparty wallet designed for Spells of Genesis card collectors
-
I love how CounterTools all run locally in your browser. You don't need to set-up a server or anything.
-
the grift is in SRC? What's the difference in the grift from BTNS which is very closely linked to CP? How is this solely about SRC? What's your beef here really besides just stirring up shit?
For the record I do personally agree with XCP fee for the numerical assets, however much it does not align with the stamps community or the stamps meme. I would definitely err on the side of the status quo unless there is a very broad consensus within CP on the decision - which there is not.
All of this XCP fee talk brings up a big unknown within the stamps community. Would the users support the fee and carry on, go elsewhere, or demand that stamps shift into a fork of CP without the fee? Those were all the unknowns and user demand we were contending with during rapid growth. A fee could also increase the value of historical stamps since they would become more costly to create in the future as a benefit to collectors. Even just shutting down the project and archiving the numeric bitcoin stamps as an overall collection was an option to grow value. It's not a simple choice, lots of things to be weighed for both stamps and CP as whole. We chose to keep building and become more involved in growing both ecosystems.
Otherwise shove all this grifting nonsense up your ass. For my financial benefit I would prefer the xcp fee at the highest rate for all CP trx in perpetuity if it were all about a grift. The worst case it may at least slow down adoption and decrease the need for rapid development and ease database performance issues. LIkely rapidly increasing value of all historical assets which is another win for the grift lol -
I would like to get 5 different assets from 5 different dispensers. If I import my counterparty wallet priv key to Electrum and initiate 1 "pay to many" transaction (sending funds to all 5 dispensers with 1 tx) will that work with the dispensing part? (ie will the 5 dispensers recognize the funds -although coming from the same tx id- and dispense back the assets?). Tx fees are high ATM, and thought of not initiating 5 individual tx -one for each dispenser- -
Update has been pushed in production. It should work in theory. Don't know anyone that has tested it. Feel free to and give some feedback 👀🔥 -
well... I thought of asking first for some reassurance (maybe from someone who has done it before), since if it does not work, then I would prolly lose all the funds sent to the 5 dispensers (if no assets will get dispensed back). 😝
-
Try to buy one you want, and one you don't but very very cheap. You'll know and tested yourself. Dyor thingy 🤩
-
Now we're getting somewhere
-
GitHub - loon3/pepechain: Proof of Rare
Proof of Rare. Contribute to loon3/pepechain development by creating an account on GitHub.
-
isn't the point of public discourse sharing points of view and coming to a collective decision. I shared my perspective and all we hear from you is slander. gtfo. There's nothing to compete with btw. So feel free to do as you wish with whatever open source code you like. I certainly won't call you a cuck for growing new communities or experimenting with different ways of doing things on bitcoin. Sounds like you need to get laid, really.
-
you still didn't answer the question. why are you so bitter about src which has non impact on CP. meanwhile BTNS is flooding the database with spam.
-
haha coming from the guy whose most eloquent word is cuck
-
and what was i trying to supposedly leverage against xcp? that's an unrealistic perspective.
-
LOL the fork was threatened against me mutherfucker
-
Not sure if I get your point here, are you proposing something? Because it seems you just neglect the work of others for some reasons. Also you complain on people being passive agressive while everyone is talking politely to you that are just agresive... -
either shut it down or xchain pushes an emergency fork. read the fkn history next time
-
still true. it was a rushed rash decision for xchain to push a fork without due preparation
-
xchain was threatening a forking because they were afraid of the database growth and potential future ramifications of such traffic/bloat from src-20 within CP as a whole. We requested time to resolve that and we all came to an agreement to avoid any such chaos. everyone has moved on besides you.
-
what xchain decides the rest of the community has to follow as the primary resource
-
proof with the current fork that was just pushed
-
Here lies the problem -
You’re new here aren’t you? Came for the stamps? -
thats not really the case, there are other stakeholders outside of xchain but its certainly a issue having only one block explorer
-
the current 9.61 was a consensus change btw.
You want to see passive aggressive btw. Take a look at this asset.
https://xchain.io/search?query=FORKOFF
this asset DOES NOT show on 9.60. Everyone had to accept this change or fall out of consensus -
Most devs are not concerned with ‘increasing value of historical assets’. That type of thinking is too near sighted for these topics.
-
its a shame that every time we seem to be getting somewhere wrt working together someone has to jump in and stir the shit again
-
I very much agree. Coming in it appears that XCP value has more sway. But it is clearly a stable utility. Hence more rational decisions can be made. Obviously why that has little sway in the decision to utilize XCP on numeric assets.
-
What?
-
i agree with you
-
xcp as a historical asset as well lol. but it is a perspective
-
tbh that doesnt make a lot of sense, nothing a dev does inherently increases the value of anything, the important thing IMO is to be conservative so as not to destroy the value of existing assets through consensus bugs, etc
-
which is why the focus after 9.61 should be on efficiency upgrades, suring up the tech stack, building a test suite, etc
-
Wtt for FORKOFF
-
-
I’ll reword my previous statement regarding his statement. Devs should not make decisions with the intent/possibility of altering assets value up or down. The protocol needs to be agnostic to perceive value. Core Devs need to make protocol decisions neutrally.
-
And I’m not calling out a dev here. The comment mentioned increasing value of assets with a protocol change.
-
J Loone Brickens 🧱 (@wasthatawolf) on X
Please note the https://t.co/T5chBorvvK and https://t.co/tbPCY7prVW do not use the Ledger Connect Kit library. Please carry on.
-
I'm just never going to use my brand new ledger... ever. Its insane to trust that company.
-
cant say i really blame you
-
i guess i should start working on integrating trezor
-
it is important to note tho that when using ledger with rarepepewallet.wtf it uses the bare minimum of libraries
-
hw-app-btc and hw-transport-webusb
-
not only that but the hw-app-btc it uses is a fork i created to fix their signing issue with bech32 addresses
-
so it can't autoupdate
-
Trezor, Bitbox02, any hhw that’s going down an opensource route should be the future. -
I'm Software 🦇🔊 (@MatthewLilley) on X
What happened? In short, @Ledger made a chain of terrible blunders. 1. They are loading JS from a CDN. 2. They are not version locking loaded JS. 3. They had their CDN compromised. I would avoid using ANY dApps until their teams confirm that they have mitigated the attack.
-
wen pbsts for coldcard
-
ledger was added first because its the most used hww for eth nft collectors and gave them an easy on-ramp to rare pepes
-
good to know everyone is just winging it
-
i have a coldcard actually, still in the packaging lol
-
i built rarepepewallet in a way that i can add more hww's easily
-
i guess i should order a new trezor and get that process started
-
Foundation looks pretty nice... its like Coldcard but with good UX
-
After leaking their client addresses they should have been shunned but muh altcoins
-
its still the most used hww
-
I just got the new trezor safe 3 for $80 and am in the process of writing up a how-to guide for moving your CP assets to it 👍🏻
-
I remember Indelible was playing around with the BitBox02 about 1.5 years ago. Him n Scrilla even had a chat with Douglas and the Bitbox team. Maybe that could be revived. 🌉
-
Good thing about this one is you can choose “Bitcoin only” as the firmware. And it has a secure chip so no need for a passphrase (but that is still an option)
-
shocking statistic
-
eth heads arent known for best security practices
-
True they are also interesting. I’d say Trezor, Bitbox02, Foundation Passport, Coldcard, Seedsigner and maybe blockstream Jade would be a good start to look at. There’s like so many more out there but those are here for a bit and afaik. stay on top of issues arising.
-
supporting all of them turns into a nightmare on my side
-
ill focus on trezor for now
-
alright just bought a trezor safe 3 for testing
-
Might be trolling, not sure...
https://x.com/udiWertheimer/status/1735308883160100996?s=20Udi Wertheimer (@udiWertheimer) on Xmost tweets about ledger are wrong here’s what you need to know: ALL ACTIVE ETHEREUM WALLETS ARE AT RISK don’t connect ANY ethereum/evm wallets to ANY apps until further notice doesn’t matter if it’s a ledger or not if you didn’t use your wallet today you’re safe
-
-
😁
-
Wen PSBTs - Pepe Signed Bitcoin Transactions -
-
he's not wrong, people use the connect kit to connect any type of wallet software or hardware
-
it also might not be limited to ETH
-
-
shiiiiit
-
sounds trollish .. how can a wallet you used yesterday be OK but one you used today not? when the keys are in a hardware device ?
I admit I not as well educated on ETH metamask -
Paolo Ardoino 🍐 (@paoloardoino) on X
Tether just froze the Ledger exploiter address
-
Malicious ex-employee responsible for the ConnectKit malware
-
probly shouldnt jump to that conclusion
-
his gmail could have been compromised
-
paper wallets people....
u gotta write down keywords for anything anyway so why rely on anyone else as well?
2factor/multi factor paper wallets cannot ever be beat
if only people listened.. -
this isnt an issue related to stealing keys
-
its about signing things that are malicious txs
-
the problem with eth and all the evm stuff is you're constantly giving them permissions to your wallet
-
its a very bad security model
-
eth was insecure code from day 1 - not sure anyone has campaigned against eth more..
-
it does enable some cool things but at the expense of security
-
but still should have bought some at $20..
-
its all about trade-offs
-
Its just so crazy. Their brand value is like 99% reputation. Doesn't matter how good the hardware is. Once you lose trust, that's the end of your company. How do they run a company like this?
-
i mean you could have said that multiple times about ledger but still they are dominant market share
-
i think the switching costs are just too high for people to care
-
Very true.
-
Many of us could be billionaires by now simply by buying into the ETH crowd sale on day one…. Some things are more important than profit and $$$… unfortunately most are in the space for the wrong reasons 🤷🏻♂️
-
I’ve been waiting on the stamps indexer. Can you share?
-
Still working on ser, we are close
-
Rijndael (@rot13maxi) on X
Seeing the Ledger news? Quick TLDR: Ethereum application ("dApp") frontends have a button to connect your wallet. The button that ledger vends to connect your wallet had a dependency get compromised and replaced with a wallet drainer. So if you go to a website that has that…
-
ledger not using cryptographic hashes to secure its crypto software should tell anyone everything they need to know .. failing that doxxing your customers should..
I won't hold my breath -
I'm Software 🦇🔊 (@MatthewLilley)
What happened? In short, @Ledger made a chain of terrible blunders. 1. They are loading JS from a CDN. 2. They are not version locking loaded JS. 3. They had their CDN compromised. I would avoid using ANY dApps until their teams confirm that they have mitigated the attack.
-
should have done it... 😉
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2w120g/help_me_set_up_a_new_exchange/From the Bitcoin community on RedditExplore this post and more from the Bitcoin community
-
crypsy exchange threatened to sue us, then of course turned out to be a scam lol
-
was that big vern?
-
think so
-
my favorite shit exchange from back in the day was bter
-
So, stamps are still ‘in counterparty’ and very much a counterparty thing. I have been saying this since day one.
-
From what I’ve heard the indexer is still being written, and won’t be open sourced until they collect enough funds… sidenote… BTNS indexer was written for free seven months ago and published at no cost… including an explorer, etc.
Everyone involved in CP is entitled to their own interest and building their own projects, and funding them how they best see fit.
Some relatively new devs in the community have fundamentally different approaches to building open source software…. Which is fine…. But I think this difference in viewpoints is what has divided the community… and pushed some devs away from CP to focus energy elsewhere.
I think CP will be fine, it’s in good hands with @hodlencoinfield @shannoncode @jp_janssen … they all have been with CP since the early days, have watched CP struggle and grow, and have a good grasp of the current status and community desires.
And I’m still around (got 1% of xcp n 20k+ asset names)… just not sole core maintainer anymore… but I’m not gone, just taking a step back for my own sanity n good of the community. -
How did that all play out? Wasn’t big Vern the one that went through a divorce and then tried to bail to China with all the funds to keep it from the ex-wife?
TLDR don’t start exchanges with ur wife… lol -
sounds about right lol
-
educating ex-wife about bitcoin would have been fatal...
boat accidents 😘 -
he became a rarepepe znd lives happily ever after in S2
-
-
It’s funny how much counterparty drama or history is captured in cards…. Someday we will all have to sit down and have a fireside chat and document some of this little known counterparty history and drama.
-
Eh, I thought it was pretty funny… “fork your mother if you want to fork”…. OGs get the reference n context🤷🏻♂️😜
-
JIHANWU
-
TEST 10 panel talk? I’ll take notes 👍🏻 @jdogresorg @ShawnLeary
-
-
With Bourbon.
-
I dropped into the stamps chat a minute ago to take the conversation there and this is the fourth comment from the bottom…
-
-
I lost a bunch in crypsy, the actually pretty much did what u sarcastically proposed up there back in the days.
-
There are just a few hands working on this. But its almost done. That said src20 people want to get rich fast, thats all it is.
-
Hey guys, needed some help. I minted some SRC 20 using wrong freewallet. I used freewallet dot org instead of freewallet dot io. Is ther a way for me to recover my SRC 20 tokens? Any help would be highly appreciated. TIA -
This isn’t the right forum as src20 is not on Counterparty. That being said: if you can get at the private key you should be able to import it into freewallet
-
Apologies for posting here and thank you for the reply.
-
its the interaction that puts us at risk from what i understand. Can't get an STI if you are remaining celibate on a deserted island
-
Seems it ok to use your Ledger with Electrum so those such pepes are safe .. but anything not pure BTC and anthing using Ledger software and Dapps is hella risky
-
Or SeedSigner 👀 @reganhimself
-
I know im an interloper
-
Just an “opinionated observer”
-
But an airgapped signing device for XCP assets would be amazing
-
Pop Punk (@PopPunkOnChain) on X
I have no trust in Ledger anymore. Earlier this morning their hack caused me to lose 2x Mutant Ape 1x Bored Ape How could you do this to me?
-
Holy merde the TX fees are going insane........
-
"got 1% of xcp n 200 asset names"
LOVE IT! -
you can sign op_returns on a coldcard i think all we need is the hex in a psbt
-
ETH is the most unsecure setup in history
-
Literally nothing is safe except by doing nothing
-
If I would have done nothing I’d probably have 100 ETH in my wallet rather than a bunch of failed shitcoins, ICO’s and jpgs 🥲
-
ETH is the equivalent to a credit card with no theft recourse
- 15 December 2023 (41 messages)
-
Sending payment is push, sure. Once you connect the wallet, it essentially becomes pull if it’s a bad actor.
Everyone is the test dummy each and every time they connect their wallet. -
CP is great because when we have a problem, everything often just stops working protecting all users
-
Plus everything is push, way better design
-
SHA256
-
The retard spammers stamp’s inscriptions etc are actually a counterparty attack. Few understand this
-
They eventually lose so it’s fun to see what scammers come from it. A natural filter
-
once again here...
-
If I didn’t use CP, I’d prob have 100 BTC in my wallet 😂
-
-
when are the counterwallet servers going to be live again? -
still working on a fix... counterblock has some issue with parsing the new dispenser closes n chokes... counterparty-lib works fine, but counterblock is having issues.... Javier n I have spent 3+ days working on trying to have a "hotfix" to the issue on counterblock... but no simple hotfix is working... so it'll be up when the community prioritizes and funds a fix.... freewallet.io is up and working fine.... Javier will be putting forth a PR with the details tomorrow and the community can decide how to proceed.
-
lame... I am trying to access my stamps on there
-
so is rpw.wtf, rarepepewallet.com, and prettymuch every other wallet except the 10 year old counterwallet software
-
they are all down?
-
no, all are up and working fine
-
its just counterwallet
-
thats down?
-
yes.. just counterwallet
-
😐
-
freewallet, xchain, and all other wallets working fine (you can see txs on network on xchain fine)... so... cp is up, wallets are up... juts old/outdated counterwallet is down
-
its simple... use some other wallet, or wait for a fix... not much else to do
-
yup I guess so
-
Dude easy on J-Dog, he has been holding this project together for years. Just give thanks 🙏
-
Can I pull the private key from the testnet?
-
freewallet works with mainnet/testnet and allows importing/exporting private keys for both networks... so yes
-
yeah I dont have the private key though... I have the 12 word thing
-
plug 12-word seed into freewallet.... switch to settings.. switch to testnet... done
-
all addresses for testnet associated with that seed will be added to wallet... same as mainnet
-
Freewallet.io Chat
This is a channel to discuss FreeWallet and ask questions and let the community answer
-
FAQ n shiz there... take your FW questions there pls 🙂
-
Damn bro saw the video, glad you’re good man
-
This isn’t the right forum as src20 is not on Counterparty
-
Hey, are there issues logging into counterwallet atm? -
Yes. Use a different wallet for now.
- 16 December 2023 (45 messages)
-
The dispenser will not return a token to you. It can't sense funds being received from a taproot address (don't ask me to explain the technical reason). Bottom line: Taproot support has not yet been added to Counterparty.
-
also: it's not stated, but don't use an address starting with "3" either. Use a "1" address or segwit only "bc1q"
-
whoa thats a little aggressive 😅
-
You realize that this is literally how Counterparty has worked for years when you do a multi-send, right?
-
Not talking about OP_RETURN... I'm talking about regular ol' CP when the message exceeds 80 bytes
-
Did you know that even before Stamps started there are approximately 10 BTC worth of Sats stuck in the UTXO set because of Counterparty txns?
-
GM, can someone have a look at this please?
Below assets are from green banner rare coco directory, I can’t see any of them on xchain. Why is it?
For me they are now worthless, how do you explain this to collectors who just want to collect instead of digging in GitHub for hours? Thanks.
https://xchain.io/asset/VANCOCOGH
https://xchain.io/asset/COCOBASQUIAT
https://xchain.io/asset/COCOSCREAM -
Do you happen to know -have you tried - if I import my counterparty wallet priv key to Electrum and initiate 1 "pay to many" transaction (sending funds to many dispensers with 1 tx) will that work with the dispensing part? (ie will the different dispensers recognize the funds -although coming from the same tx id- and dispense back the assets?). Tx fees are high ATM, and thought of not initiating many individual tx -one for each dispenser-
Thanks. -
-
says errors .. looks like is not in collection json .. collections are centralised
-
speak to collection ceo
-
your stamps are ghey
-
lol I don’t think we know how you feel yet
-
I think more trans than ghey… being cross-platform n all🤷🏻♂️
-
And they’re beautiful -
Fake and Ghey, I’m told.
-
binary
-
There’s a reason they call them tramp stamps
-
But we do appreciate finding the bug enriching the miners and eventually making bitcoin more secure
-
Dank Stamps going to the moon bro
-
-
Bobo is your fren
-
-
I just find the crab bucket mentality and the holier than thou attitude very amusing. The same forces vilifying Stamps have no love for OP_RETURN pointers either. It’s viewed as “slightly less bad” at best. But go on telling me my thing is stupid and evil.
-
And don’t get me started on how this situation perfectly mirrors the 2014 OP_RETURN war with Core except now you’re on the wrong side of history
-
Doesn’t take compliments well🤣
Official Counterparty Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 Dec 2023 (69)
- 02 Dec 2023 (16)
- 03 Dec 2023 (13)
- 04 Dec 2023 (10)
- 05 Dec 2023 (49)
- 06 Dec 2023 (20)
- 07 Dec 2023 (33)
- 08 Dec 2023 (23)
- 09 Dec 2023 (67)
- 10 Dec 2023 (23)
- 11 Dec 2023 (104)
- 12 Dec 2023 (85)
- 13 Dec 2023 (143)
- 14 Dec 2023 (268)
- 15 Dec 2023 (41)
- 16 Dec 2023 (45)
- 17 Dec 2023 (116)
- 18 Dec 2023 (49)
- 19 Dec 2023 (18)
- 20 Dec 2023 (24)
- 21 Dec 2023 (287)
- 22 Dec 2023 (35)
- 23 Dec 2023 (73)
- 24 Dec 2023 (13)
- 25 Dec 2023 (3)
- 26 Dec 2023 (1)
- 27 Dec 2023 (3)
- 28 Dec 2023 (6)
- 29 Dec 2023 (19)
- 30 Dec 2023 (6)
- 31 Dec 2023 (43)