- 27 December 2017 (26 messages)
-
-
-
-
Christian MossI wrote a blog on atomic swaps with @CounterpartyXCP for @Indie_Square blog https://t.co/K3nFByCVAT
-
⭐ Fitness -
Does she blockchain -
-
Bloodhound Gang - Asleep At The Wheel
Seventh track of the One Fierce Beer Coaster (LP) by Bloodhound Gang released in 3rd December, 1996. (C) 1996 Geffen Records, Inc. Lyrics by Jimmy Pop. Bloodhounds shall cruise rendezvous Break curfew new trip ensues You never know Bloodhounds just go Pack backpack up for down the road No change of clothes but change for tolls Pack of No-Doz Rolos and Skoal Old Milwaukee Jolt black coffee Sugar Daddy Rand McNally A pack of jacks those orange Tic-Tacs Glen Miller tracks roll of Kodak The phantom black stacked Pontiac Hot rod dual quads and in the back Is the beat keeper big ass speaker Jumbo woofer rattle tweeter Dial is turned and there it's stayin' The next day where stern is playin' You got your Jesus on the dashboard But the Devil's under my hood You're takin' it down legal, I'm pullin' it up to no good God is your copilot, I let Satan ride shotgun You pay a toll to get to Heaven But on the road to Hell there's none You got your Jesus on the dashboard But the Devil's under my hood You're takin' it down legal, I'm pullin' it up to no good God is your copilot, I let Satan ride shotgun You pay a toll to get to Heaven But on the road to Hell there's none Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel I-95 eight lanes wide, midnight drive take a ride Alongside east coast tide, gettin' high, so am I Bloodshot red eyes from the fumes I consume engine zoom then engine boom Then engine glow erupt and blow And overflow like volcano So far to go can't turn back though Cheap tobacco cup of black Joe Fuelin' my body jumstartin' my soul Set my mind on cruise control You got your Jesus on the dashboard But the Devil's under my hood You're takin' it down legal, I'm pullin' it up to no good God is your copilot, I let Satan ride shotgun You pay a toll to get to Heaven But on the road to hell there's none You got your Jesus on the dashboard But the Devil's under my hood You're takin' it down legal, I'm pullin' it up to no good God is your copilot, I let Satan ride shotgun You pay a toll to get to Heaven But on the road to hell there's none Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel 24-7 Truck Stop Plaza Turn off headlights turn on hazards 3 A.M. is when I gazed Eyes glazed I'm dazed and then I fade To black now were back 'On The Road' like Kerouac Down the turnpike high rate of speed Up all night like Gilbert Gottfried You got your Jesus on the dashboard But the Devil's under my hood You're takin' it down legal, I'm pullin' it up to no good God is your copilot, I let Satan ride shotgun You pay a toll to get to Heaven But on the road to hell there's none You got your Jesus on the dashboard But the Devil's under my hood You're takin' it down legal, I'm pullin' it up to no good God is your copilot, I let Satan ride shotgun You pay a toll to get to Heaven But on the road to hell there's none Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get up you're asleep at the wheel Get…
- 28 December 2017 (15 messages)
-
Alex Bosworth
Mainnet Lightning Network paying my actual phone bill with actual Mainnet funds on @bitrefill. Speed: Instant. Fee: Zero. Future: Almost Here. https://t.co/futhn502Lp
-
LN is coming! it's good news to xcp, isn't it?
-
best time to buy?
-
When Pepe Scaling 2018? -
Already started. Kek was ressurected on bitcoin blockchain in 2016. KEKRELOADED was deployed to help combat with the fuckery and corruption in the cryptosphere. As more & more transactions move on and off chain, The oververseer of chaos & bearer of light has scaled the bitcointrash evil plot to destroy bitcoin. All Hail K🐸K -
-
OpenPepe. The future is offchain OpenPepe... https://youtu.be/AwA4gZuOhtEOpenPepe Announcement: Opendime + PepeCashIntegrating Rare Pepe with Opendime. Not affiliated with Opendime or Coinkite. Music by: Theo Goodman Github repo coming soon! Tips: Send Rare Pepes to the Opendime used in the video! 13cdnAkknyUor1WquA2MZBAADWwNR1Uw1E
-
-
-
MC Pepe
- 29 December 2017 (23 messages)
-
Why do orders expire so soon using counterwallet? How to set longer orders?
-
Counterwallet cannot access, loading forever -
This is very bad
-
Before this counterwallet is very fast
-
Pls do something about it
-
I like xcp dex
-
-
what's that meaning?
-
use coindaddy
-
I already got it through
-
It means tell counterparty users stop spamming blockchain with ridiculous low fees causing traffic jams. And for those who are part of the team to do real innovative dev work. No pawn intended. Hats off and thumbs up to those keeping XCP alive and well.
-
Three letter asset names is sort of like going nuclear right? Press it before we are completely deaded. I don’t see why we shouldn’t have them. At this point, if we aren’t ready for prime time, when will we?
-
* shouldn’t
-
right, pressing it after we are deaded would be dumb
-
let’s do it
-
For clarity concerning the "Counterparty Foundation", I have no connection with that "foundation". The "Foundation" apparently has never been a 501(C)(6) organization and has never, to my understanding, been appropriately run as a 501(C)(6) organization. - 30 December 2017 (1015 messages)
-
The Devs, founders, and people that understand the off chain improvements coming with SW and LN seems to have that opinion. What is the value prop of XCP to you Shaun?
-
I think the asset name holders are in control now. Scorched earth move. Sad.
-
What foundation?
-
Lol -
@junseth with his 5th comment in a counterpart chat in 2 years, congrats, special item unlocked ;)
-
Yup. I'm allowed to not speak often. I spoke a lot for a long time at the beginning of this priject.
-
Yea, thank you for that :)
-
But this is insane. How can everyone have a discussion when the most basic premises arent admitted. What foundation? Where do you go with that?
-
That's just dishonest. And this wasnt even a discussion about the validity od the foundation.
-
I’m waiting for Dante’s to tell me. One week he is pro forking to light coin with a snapshot, the next week he is resigning saying there is not such thing as a foundation
-
The reason that LN and other scaling solutions can't be implemented here, btw, is that there is very little interest by competent devs to work on the priblem.
-
R u so sure?
-
Perhaps it’s obvious
-
Well shawn, that's fine. But what would you do if every time you made a point the lies start. And they are weird lies about small things.
-
Bitcoin is the database for Counterparty assets, it can easily be other chains. It’s just a matter of do you think a protocol being used more attracts devs or not. Apparently josh is saying we have a lack of
-
So if we limit the use even further more devs will appear to help?
-
My point is that the discussion hasn't even started because the honesty is too damn low. Right now you csnt even admit that the foundation is a thing you claim to be part of.
-
Secret episode #2
-
You're welcome on. I'd happily facilitate the discussion. But the honesty thing is bullshit
-
Also, I'm not saying you lack devs. That's not a claim. It's a matter of fact.
-
Agreed
-
The devs that contribute to counterparty do not have an interest in the science of the project.
-
You don't get devs that are by moving chains.
-
Yoi just fuck everyone over. What happens one day when people who ise the counterwallet app login to find that their bitcoijns are gone and their entire wallet is filled with lite coin addresses?
-
Good
-
Im amazed a votw could take place on an issue i was told last week wasnt even being considered. Glad the matter that didnt exist hss been settled.
-
I think people should know what the founders and core git hub maintainers feel.
-
I think that counterparties not developimg for compatiibility on bch was interestkng.
-
There are projects that are deaded now on XCP
-
and that’s fine
-
@shawn, can you hold a vote on their favoritw sandwiches?
-
I'd like to know the answer to that too.
-
there is one project moving to BTrash
-
Throw fsvorite jolly rancher flavors in there since were voting
-
IMHO the only way a fork could work equitably is if you could replicate all wallets exactly, preserving all balances, ownerships and orders on a future snapshot date with exhaustive public notification process over many months, then reinstantiate on a new chain, with same wallet addresses and secret phrases. and I don't even know if that's technically possible. -
did somebody say sandwichpepe?
-
i’m sure it’s fun to show up once a year and rag the volunteers :)
-
Well, this entire matter would have been settled had the dev team acted competently during the fork and developed for both chains just in case.
-
@chiguireitor i have plenty of respect for those maintaining the project. Thank you for your work.
-
Thats not whats at issue here.
-
was there discusssion that took account of the example of the ETH/ETC hard fork outcome?
-
I think sending the project into hibernation and waiting for the big FinCen players to show up is a strategy, and i think that’s what’s going to have to take place now.
-
maybe a big company will show up tomorrow and go, hell yea. never know.
-
I dint think anyone is proposing that shawn.
-
good
-
that’s why i think LLL is a good move
-
i don’t think it can hurt
-
Well, if you want to construct strawmen, again its going to be hard to argue.
-
the straw men were created at the start when LLL wasn’t permitted no?
-
why was the foundation non profit rejected and allowed to be deaded?
-
i’ve had a change of heat.
-
is that allowed Dan?
-
What are the chances of fixing the A names problem, no serious FinCen players are going to use Counterparty as an enterprise platform until all letters of the alphabet are available... I said this in November 2016, there was some good discussion on how that might be resolved, but the concerns around disenfranchising XA asset name holders seemed to outweigh the need to fix this?
-
not that anything i saw mean anything just spouting opinions
-
If nobody else kept a copy of the relevant discussion from Slack back then, I think I have a transcript in email... will go find it, if that's of use @droplister?
-
Okay, thank you, will do
-
i’m glad we are getting some more involvement out of all this drama. it’s a good thing regardless of the egos bruised and confusion.
-
it might just be enough to keep things moving in the right direction :)
-
I think we all want Counterparty to not only survive, but thrive and win... just differences of opinion on what that looks like and how to get there?
-
yes, almost parallel universes of difference 😉
-
genuine community consensus is a rare, curious, almost mythical beast...
-
there have been sightings here and there
-
is there a current document encapsulating the biggest threats and points of disagreement?
-
I've spoken with Julian / BF and I understand his commercial requirements.. but he's one founder with a specific set of requirements... so that's a possible pathway that community could consider a broad based migration case for... or there are other options such as Litecoin one which I know very little about at this point? Any other options on the table?
I understand the default position is staying with Bitcoin and continuing to seek optimisations, greater efficiencies. -
Well, again, there are some real issues. I think you have to move forward as though bitcoin is where this project is forever.
-
So now you have isues on bitcoin. 1) fees are high. How do you solve that? 2) a assets arent allowed. Is that a problem? 3) when or of 3 letter assets?
-
Yes, for Counterparty's current foundation team, developers and available funding, I believe that makes sense
-
Julian is a moron
-
His project is retarded. And he can do whatever he wants. This is the blockfreight guy right?
-
Sry didnt ask before insulting. Just assumed.
-
yes... if it makes sense for him commercially to do his own fork but the community sees no upside in going that way, he'll do it in whatever way works for him
-
There are plenty of other questions too. Do you reenable callavle assets?
-
well I know its not a fork, what's the correct term, a port?
-
@rarepepenews, julians business willl literally go nowhere.
-
Sure. Call it a port.
-
Which is a place julian has never been despite trying to revolutionise the shipping industry.
-
Blockchains suck.they are inefficient.
-
Movong blockchains dors nothing but kick the can down the road.
-
Your best bet, if low fees are your objective is to find the least used coin and port to ir
-
So i would propose porting to vaginacoin
-
I believe the A assets problem has to be fixed before anyone can consider developing commercial / enterprise asset trading platforms on counterparty that have credibility in the fintech space.
-
What do you mean john?
-
Right.
-
vaginacoin, haha, what about mooncoin, that's only 2 sats, I'm sure we can take it over :)
-
But it shouldnt matter. What you could do from a ui persoective is just display any xa asset as an a asset
-
Then reduce the letter count on a assets to be 11 instead of 12
-
Since there is that dangling x.
-
Just lett the owner decide upon creatuon whether it is an a or x asset.
-
Well moving chains to avoid fees was always an absurd proposal because its a bet on the disuse of those chains.
-
What if? Let the asset owner toggle it in the ui
-
yes, I understand, moving chains is just swapping deckchairs around, unless it's to open up a compelling new set of functional possibilities not currently available
-
Or make all a names xa and all x names xx
-
And both a and x will have only 11 characters in the namespace.
-
mapping XA —> A, it's a kludge, not an elegant consistent resolution :)
-
The problems here aren't impossible mbut thats a ui issue. Thats it
-
When has any blockchain solution been elegant
-
You are encoding this shit in a giant beach of information that can onl y be founs with an index server.
-
Hoe would you encode it john?
-
that's true and funny AF in itself
-
EPEPERAR
-
That's interesting. But you still need a toggle for worss ending in a
-
So the protocol knows.
-
Or i suppose you'd deloneate it on creation. Point is that is still not any more elegant.
-
I'm going to read https://counterpartytalk.org/t/idea-allow-assets-starting-with-a/2449 before I throw any more of my own thought bubbles in here :)Idea: Allow assets starting with A
If we reserve the first 2 bytes for a special A asset marker and use the 3rd byte for a length marker, then any asset ID that starts with 0xfff would become a special A asset. The asset id encoding format for A assets will be: 0xffff {1 lengthByte} {5 assetIDBytes} We will need to make an exception for A18446744073709551615 as this action would invalidate this asset: http://blockscan.com/assetInfo/A18446744073709551615. (Or this asset would just turn into the equivalent named A asset ) Th...
-
@droplister did you have a separate CIP draft on CPT more recent than this older discussion?
-
Yup
-
ah, thanks got it now https://counterpartytalk.org/t/cip-proposal-open-the-a-namespace/3946/2
I note there's been no responses or feedback on your proposed code at this point.CIP Proposal - Open the 'A' NamespaceThis thread is about a potential CIP that would allow for non-numeric ‘A’ asset names. I have some code that I think covers most of it here, for review and feedback: Result: Non-numeric asset names starting with ‘A’ are valid. Check that assets are numeric rather than “Starts with ‘A’” Todos: Testnet tx fixture for parsing.
-
so is moving to LTC but that was not stopping anyone
-
If you were around from the beginning you would see that that kind of move was against all the ethos
-
Counterparty was always clearly a Bitcoin meta layer
-
#rarepepe #pepedex
-
what foundation?
-
the one dante was agreeing with devin to move to Litecoin with if asset names could be retained? lol
-
I'm missing the context for this zen koan
-
basically JDog is left with a bunch of funds in his control unless we have a foundation
-
it’s a shitty place to be in. part of the scorched earth plan
-
he was at the time :)
-
how can we have tranquil gardens were happy pepes conduct leisurely commerce from the comfort of their lily pads, instead of scorched earth?
-
jdog could just choose not to ever move the funds again as well regardless of what anyone says or wants. like u said, what if something happened to him?
-
what foundation?
-
is it not preposterous that possibly a billion dollars of theoretically realisible digital asset value can have a single point of failure? May J-Dog live long and prosper, but how is the non-existent foundation managing this risk?
-
we are waiting for Dante to come back so we can vote to hire a lawyer to fix everything LOL
-
oh, yeah I've seen how lawyers fix shit
-
i think the foundation owes a couple hundred bucks to pay for the entity to continue
-
it’s not gone gone but close to being gone.
-
hmmm okay
-
but with the non profit not being approved i think it was pointless for it to continue AFAIK
-
but i’m not a lawyer
-
You are a liar @ShawnLeary
There was a conference call where you and your cabal described your 3-5 possible plans to fork to LTC and the only one that would not damage asset holders with possible new owners of the same asset names was the first idea put out by Devon.
I never agreed to doing a move to LTC but I voiced that the only idea that was the least shitty was that one. None of you people wanted that though. -
so that's a thing to fix to start with
-
HaHahahahahahah!!!!
-
I'm waiting you to do some sucking
-
u are denying you agreed that a fork to LTC was good only if you held onto your asset names?
-
I'm just gonna make a cup of tea and come back in a while...
-
you and devon were on the same page which made jdog quit the skype call
-
and then i came around to your two opinions but whatever
-
i don’t agree
-
litecoin should be it’s own project
-
it’s not counterparty
-
Because there are bo devs.
-
i have no problem publicly stating when i change my mind
-
i think the funny back story is the recent article about Trevor while on the board pushing for Bitcoin unlimited!
-
i was in the “cabal” chat and never once heard that!!!
-
i agree. they are in the discord, it was in the chat Dante setup
-
It was in a public chat but wasn’t recorded
-
because they don't want that transparency
-
Dante who setup the discord?
-
again, i point to the last time the foundation was pushing for a fork. we never heard ANYTHING about it
-
all calls are recorded as you called for in the 1st meeting
-
i’m the dick who has been trying to add Dan to the “cabal” chat.
-
ppl have left the chat thinking he might actually join too :)
-
dante who setup the Official Counteparty Discord where the cabal meeting took place?
-
-
@ShawnLeary you recorded the call last week as per your verbatim plagiarism of Robby's comments on the caall that you used in your last post on counterpartytalk
-
@ShawnLeary I invite you to post that audio
-
Dante, who owns/setup the Counterparty Discord that the last “cabal” chat happened?
-
LOL
-
Wait i’m the liar right??
-
Your cabal meeting? IDK where you did that
-
guys, this is fundamentally about ensuring there's an open transparent governance framework, providing clear procedures for debate, with a mechanism for all voices to be heard, some kind of democratic decision making process with verifiable documentation of outcomes?
-
Dante did you setup the official counterparty discord?
-
YES
-
you know the answer
-
You are hosting these “cabal” meetings. LOL
-
are you being cute?
-
nope
-
you have whatever other meetings you want
-
that I was not part of
-
he has kept this project alive.
-
what have you done?
-
i didn’t deny the cabal
-
just curious to why Dante things he isn’t part of it all of a sudden
-
Not sure what everyone is still fighting over
-
Counterparty is Bitcoin and isn’t going anywhere.
-
Unless everyone loves BCash and Julian 🤣
-
part of what dude?
-
exactly
-
Not quite, this will have to do
-
-
@ShawnLeary why don't you release the recording from last Thursday? You know, the one where Robby asked for a vote among 7 people about who wanted to fork?
-
Only people against it was Mike, me, and J-Douche (for his own weird reasons)
For was Robby, Reuben, Devon,
"On the fence" was Shawn Leary -
is that not true @ShawnLeary ?
-
I'm still trying to grok all the recent action...
I take it such a vote would have been a (non)foundation-non-binding straw poll, if it were not a publicly notified, convened and documented (non)foundation meeting?
Hence the "cabal" references? -
I think it's fine for people who either hold or have held leadership roles, or have highly invested stakes and interests in the project to have such discussions and to treat such votes as straw polls makes sense, then positions can be published for wider community input?
-
I'm not going to get into people's personal beefs, I'm looking at this from a governance problem/solution perspective
-
I was given a tl;dr months ago from one person that he and others including @ShawnLeary and @chiguireitor and others were planning a fork
-
👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼
-
BRB, ... dinner
-
if we start from the premise that we have a process problem, not a people problem, it makes deadlock resolution and forward progress much easier. I realise that's not necessarily the "truth" for everyone, but it's a place to stand and work from
-
I'm going to take some time today to read through counterpartytalk, get back into slack, go back over some of this, start to map out what I see the core themes and ideational conflicts are... if we can map out a set of conflict clouds for consideration, that could help break any remaining perceived deadlocks / paradoxes.
-
Evaporating Cloud
The Evaporating Cloud is one of the six Thinking Processes in the Theory of Constraints. The Evaporating Cloud (EC) - also referred to in the literature as "the cloud", or as a "conflict resolution diagram" - is a logical diagram representing a problem that has no obvious satisfactory solution.
-
I'll work through with this framework and see what I can come up with
-
the only certain point I can see requiring urgent action is getting the lawyering done to ensure the foundation is duely registered as an NFP with a valid board?
-
MFBA.
Is there a conflict or impasse with respect to the very existence and rationale of the Counterparty Foundation?
Does that need to be included in the scope of conflict resolution? -
My natural assumption is a functional foundation (either with its current bylaws or with proposed amendments) is an essential requirement for effective project and community governance.
However, if there is a desire on the part of enough interested parties to re-examine fundamental assumptions in order to achieve consensus to move forward, is there a benefit in doing that?
I'm not trying to blow things up here by the way, I'm merely seeking to establish a common place for everyone to stand in shared understanding, in order to move forward.
As it seems to me that is what is missing right now.
If I've got this wrong, happy to be corrected :) -
And if not enough people think this is a useful line of inquiry, I'm happy to drop it. I'm committed to Counterparty's success, but I'm not Joan of Arc on a Crusade here.
-
I'm not this Pepe.
-
-
Check this:
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/Documentation/blob/master/Bylaws/Counterparty_Foundation_Bylaws.mdCounterpartyXCP/DocumentationOfficial Documentation of the Counterparty Project - CounterpartyXCP/Documentation
-
Thank you, will do.
-
BTW, for those of you who don't know me, I was a two term city councillor of a large Sydney, Australia council, chaired various committees, including planning committee which debated and voted on hundreds of millions of dollars worth of property development, basically 8.5 years on the board of an entity with billions in assets and a $150M p.a. budget... I was deputy mayor in my final year , briefly acting mayor conducting citizenship swearing in ceremony... so I know a bit about governance, chairing debates and seeking community consensus on least worst outcomes, which is about the best we can hope for in this crazy messy imperfect world.
-
once I understand what I'd be letting myself in for :)
-
we need to surface all the conflicts and all critical issues requiring resolution first, put together an agenda... I'll learn the Bylaws first then come back for suggestions :)
-
@ShawnLeary are you going to post the audio from the last conference-call?
Whether you should:
I vote YES! -
Can everyone please chime in with your vote?
-
What audio? The one you setup a bot to record with in you discord that hosted the meetin??
-
Lol
-
Meeting in
-
@ShawnLeary can you please answer the question at hand?
-
-
Nice deflection Dante, you wouldn’t want the audio released because you were all about forking the entire project to Litecoin LOL
-
Then someone knocked some sense into you :)
-
I'm asking you to
-
Which is great
-
Dude, it’s your discord chat
-
Mr "I'm on the fence" Leary
-
You spent weeks setting up all the different channels in IR
-
It
-
You even tested out the bot to record stud
-
Stuff
-
I have no idea how to record audio in discord nor care
-
post the audio shawn
-
You didn't record it in Discord but you knew that
-
Yea, it’s called being honest Dante, you should look into it.
-
you're too cute
-
What audio?
-
-
do you not have the audio @ShawnLeary ?
-
Seriously have no idea what you are talking about. Was there audio?
-
I thought you had some bot
-
👆🏼
-
-
I could go back and screen capture where you added the audio bot, lol
-
Dante it’s ok to have a change of heart, just don’t be a little b about it
-
why don't you answer the question honestly?
-
Dante you know you are wrong bro. Sad
-
It will all come out @ShawnLeary
-
How dare you break the blood brother oath of the cabal!! Shame on your family for ten generations ;)
-
Give me back my three goats
-
-
you are already doomed - you went full scammer
-
I’ve been the most honest and open board member I think.
-
I think this makes Trevor back on the board with his single vote he garnered
-
you were part of that fork cabal that Jdog told me about
-
you should do that!!!!! I love how you guys think
-
It’s joes fault, he sent one vote to each person to test out the system
-
-
👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼
-
What audio? To which cabal meeting?
-
@ShawnLeary please answer
-
Last week
-
All the ones u were at? Or the ones before?
-
I’ve recorded one Counterparty hangout and posted it
-
what part of last week is difficult?
-
If I had any audio of course I would share it.
-
The one where u were in favor of a fork to Litecoin? Lol
-
are you saying that you do not?
-
-
When Pepepoloniex?
-
@ShawnLeary will not directly answer a simple question
-
interesting
-
Dante, [29.12.17 21:36]
Only people against it was Mike, me, and J-Douche (for his own weird reasons)
For was Robby, Reuben, Devon,
"On the fence" was Shawn Leary
Dante, [29.12.17 21:36]
is that not true @ShawnLeary ? -
Can you also answer this otherone that you ignored? @ShawnLeary 👆🏼
-
To fork, or not to fork, this is the question
I am starting this thread to squelch a burgeoning moan from some and to bring transparency for others. There have been a few community members desiring that we move this entire project to another chain. This would involve a snapshot at a set block and everything, lock stock and barrel, gets implemented on a new chain, they have mainly suggested Litecoin as the destination. Litecoin has proven itself to stay lock step with Bitcoin Core and I imagine that this will continue down the road. Bitc...
-
This was my thoughts after being on the fence
-
👆🏼 mostly Robby's words
-
You stole most of that LOL
-
you wanted to sound as smart as Robby 😂
-
So when did you change your mind on the fork to Litecoin?
-
LOL when Dan spanked you? ;)
-
Josh said, are you fucking cray??
-
Lol
-
Talk about having original thoughts lolol
-
when did you stop fucking your boyfriend?
-
Does your spouse know?
-
You are a complete contradiction. I’m on record, did you even comment on that thread?
-
No you said I QUIT! Now we get Trevor lol
-
Serves us right :)
-
J-Douche decided that because it is his website after all
-
He does own all the domains
-
and the money
-
JDog has been keeping this project going for the last couple years. We should be thankful of his efforts
-
🙏
-
When the old block explorer shut down he built xchain to replace it
-
Blockscan, can’t remember, it was dank
-
I would like more ppl too TBH
-
An escrow legal entity would be great
-
It is just J-Dogparty
-
I think we will have that again
-
Hold new elections and move on.
-
Impeach
-
I think everyone would be happy to dissolve it, just don’t want him to be stuck with legal implications. Worse case scenario the money gets lost. One way is it goes back to who donated
-
Or somehow we get a legal entity again and then it just hands it over.
-
Maybe Dante could hold the funds?
-
did you all discuss that already?
-
You didn’t record the audio?? Wtf!!?? 😂
-
It’s a good resource
-
he gets reimbursed and he is also running a business that relies on that running
-
I donated a 1BTC to run his servers
-
Not sure when it was but was way before the current run up
-
-
It's the year of the forks, John
-
-
A backend plugin
-
-
Lol. Oh. Jajajaja
-
So, we can bend pepes off chain, group them and such
-
Indeed
-
Even with prints. Over saturation.
-
Centralized exchanges. DEX is complicated for most. They need a central authority.
Official Counterparty Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 Dec 2017 (59)
- 02 Dec 2017 (45)
- 03 Dec 2017 (32)
- 04 Dec 2017 (8)
- 05 Dec 2017 (60)
- 06 Dec 2017 (77)
- 07 Dec 2017 (99)
- 08 Dec 2017 (36)
- 09 Dec 2017 (107)
- 10 Dec 2017 (19)
- 11 Dec 2017 (200)
- 12 Dec 2017 (52)
- 13 Dec 2017 (43)
- 14 Dec 2017 (14)
- 15 Dec 2017 (133)
- 16 Dec 2017 (70)
- 17 Dec 2017 (59)
- 18 Dec 2017 (156)
- 19 Dec 2017 (43)
- 20 Dec 2017 (20)
- 21 Dec 2017 (39)
- 22 Dec 2017 (53)
- 23 Dec 2017 (18)
- 24 Dec 2017 (10)
- 25 Dec 2017 (18)
- 26 Dec 2017 (27)
- 27 Dec 2017 (26)
- 28 Dec 2017 (15)
- 29 Dec 2017 (23)
- 30 Dec 2017 (1015)
- 31 Dec 2017 (79)