- 27 May 2023 (494 messages)
-
Dex orders are not ruggable like DISPENSERS -
RUGSPENSERS
-
LOL only if the tool is built properly
-
It does in the DEX -
not for dispensers, 60% of the time they work 80% of the time
-
The dex is un-ruggable as far as I know.
-
dispensers are pure bitcoin sends, so you tell me how counterparty would act as escrow without doing custody of bitcoin
-
you need some bitcorn bro -
If the dispenser is low on supply and one doesn't put enough tx fees, yeah you won't have the best of lucks. -
I'm good bro, but if you wanna refund my 0.02 feel free lol my addy is in my description
-
But then if you put higher fees someone else is out of luck LOLOL what a clown show
-
-
Your concerns are valid
-
In every case someone gets FLOCKED
-
Click "EXCHANGE" then choose the pair you want, like XCP/PEPECASH and it will open a view with BUY / SELL options
-
be careful because the units can be confusing sometimes lol
-
There is no FLOCK market there yet
-
Time to roll the dice with the dispensers
-
BTC/FLOCK there is one sell order -
-
That attitude won't get you solve anything, Mr Coins.
I think you are right in pointing out those issues, but the context of the situation is very different, imo.
If you already knew the risks and was concerned about their possible impact on new users there are better ways to get your ideas heard. -
Goodmorning, am the artist of the Superheroes collection on Rarestamp.xyz homepage
https://www.rarestamp.xyz/collection/superheroes/0
Lowest priced dispensers are mine. If you face any problem,please do not hesitate to dm me. Have a beautiful weekend everybody -
I -
This is a clown show. Blatatley obvious.
-
Could be both :). Try restart the wallet.
-
I restared the wallet, market not showing
-
-
If I type it in I get this.
-
-
That is the market
-
9 years.
XCP-20 isn't a new tech but a different approach to current trends in fungible tokens on BTC
The fact the asset is an old one is part of its value, at least for people who appreciate it. -
I have some 50 flock dispensers up but can put a sell order on the market if people are bothered by dispensers -
50 flock dispensers.... there aren't nearly that many
-
Yes, that may be a better approach for newcomers
-
FLOCK was created as a response to Swarm. It has nothing to do with whay you think.
It was fully minted then but not for sale. -
Think of it as a relic with historical value.
Not as a cutting edge tech.
If anything it is a joke at others that claim theirs are. -
I have four open dispensing 50 flock at a time, but will create some on market for you if you prefer
-
Tried to buy FLOCK, got rugged by two dispensers
-
Dispensers are fucked up
1 was the 1st TX both times and confrimed in one TX
1Ag1w2X6faqYfQmskVQBh91Zxq77VZDDm
1JaiD3rmm1TQxP9hpAmXqNHoZw6zTpsBKo
PLEASE REFUND -
You've been with XCP since Jan 2014? -
FLOCK is like Fine Art for nerds, not really a financial instrument to extract value from, imho.
-
The XCP burn ended in Jan 2014. There's no way anybody involved with it would not know the risks associated with dispensers. Frankly I find it hard to believe they would be buying FLOCK, TBH.
What you need to do is contact the dispenser owners and ask for a refund. Yelling at J-Dog will get you nowhere. -
Buddy I have better things to do with my life than read this chat all day, I have used dispensers in the past assuming they worked and they always have. Why is it hard to believe "they" would be buying FLOCK? I'm complainging because it's such a moronic situation that I didn't think something so obvious would pass
-
Nothing but critisim but no one can address the issue! lol
-
OK well I already provided you with a solution: research the owners of addresses, maybe you will find them. Then politely ask for a refund.
-
-
how do i reach the owner of a bitcoin address
-
Unless its someone here who accidentally front ran me twice... lol
-
A hominems aren't just criticism.
-
Idiots upon idiots here.
-
Its not always possible but sometimes you can figure out who owns what address by following where their FLOCK came from, what tokens they have in their address. Sometimes just doing a search for related addresses in this group works.
-
Who is the creator of Counterparty?
-
Yes i've followed the FLOCK
-
BU
-
So how that i've located the original flock account... where do i find their phone number or email?
-
I've answered you're question but you probably can't find it 😂
-
The answer is Adam Krellenstein. If you had burned BTC for XCP you'd already know this...
-
lol I got XCP with chris and Junseth from bitcoin unscencored you idiot
-
Yes many dispensers are doing this... someone is using the code as intended
-
I posted them above
-
1JaiD3rmm1TQxP9hpAmXqNHoZw6zTpsBKo
-
1Ag1w2X6faqYfQmskVQBh91Zxq77VZDDm
-
These were the dispenser addy
-
you can track everything from there. i'm the addy who didn't get paid out
-
I've seen others complain about this as well on other chats.
It is a legitimate concern. -
@nutildah ? so how do i contact them?
-
I've never been ripped off on a dispenser, so I'm not sure I'm the idiot in this situation. I already told you what you need to do, beyond that there isn't much you can do.
-
Obviously!!!! It's so ridiculous and obvious it shouldn't even be a concern
-
How do I contact them?
-
And checked a couple of tx myself.
It happens in the same block, sometimes with identical timestamps, only with higher fees -
Also trying to quiz me on something that i can google isn't very telling
-
Which is why i gave you an ansawer you wouldn't understand
-
Yes they front run you with +10 sats/vB
-
LOL NO
-
The identical timestamp is what strucks me the most.
-
Yes... both times seconds appart. It's a bot
-
Def
-
100%
-
I've seen it on other dispensers I'm not involved with and I'm sure the users are confused and don't understand why they got scammed
-
This isn't my first rodeo and I'm very surprised the XCP community which is old af has allowed something so clown like to pass. I mean there are minimum stadards
-
https://xchain.io/asset/FLOCK click on dispensers, find one that is open, send them money and pray you dont get scammed
-
I see that address referenced a couple of times by the same person in the Bitcoin STAMPS channel. Maybe you can figure out the account that is scamming you? -
which address?
-
18VNeRv8vL528HF7ruKwxycrfNEeoqmHpa
-
That has nothing to do with anything
-
propbably another scammer who using a transaltor to type trying to get people to send money to that addy
-
Oh, I thought that was the address you felt was being used to scam you.
-
Mint is over
-
No i posted them a few times already
-
Mint happened 9 years ago and was done by its creator. DYOR
-
Open Mint happened a few days ago from a dispenser https://xchain.io/tx/8df1453791b5da4b8228ca4a92de650a717aac33557e3acd9039e0ab69c2b7d1
-
It's both, it dispensed FLOCK but someone can front run you with a higher fee
-
which is what has been happeneing
-
because someone new has learned how to exploit the system on a new project
-
This is the issuance tx for FLOCK
https://xchain.io/tx/23850 -
Smart contract?
-
Dumb contract
-
This is absolutely correct. The term "mint" has been changed to cater to newbies coming here from BRC20. But the actual mint indeed happened 9 years ago.
https://xchain.io/tx/23850 -
Who did this 😂😂😂😂
-
I'm definitely tempted
-
wen dispenser?
-
LMAO
-
speed tx game, get the worm before the bird rugs lmao
-
not when the dispenser owner can always send a higher value TX
-
-
😂
-
-
someone should create the dispenser for this 9yr old beauty https://xchain.io/asset/SCAM
-
LOL
-
well thats 30 mins of my life I cant get back after reading all that bollox -
Mind you RUGSPENSER doesn't use a burn addy and its supply is huge.
LOL
Still, I can imagine people aping on it. -
the new standar
-
RUG20
-
Hello! There are any RUGSPENSERS group?🥰 -
can we connect freewallet with hardware dev? -
ya I go through it here - https://oplanbtc.substack.com/p/you-can-now-hold-your-rare-pepesYou can now hold your RARE PEPE'S on Trezor!Cold Storage support now with RARE PEPE's!
-
I have a 12 word seed phrase counter wallet generated address
i have a btc sending pending tx
i want to increase its fee to unstuck it
how do i do that?
thank you very much -
lol
-
https://xchain.io/address/bc1qsdtxe28vck3pzumukeasdg0tra7ppvqcyxlysw this is the scammer who stole my monies
-
https://xchain.io/asset/RUGSPENSERS I'm dead
-
-
This actually made my day! hahaha laughing hard now with a buddy
-
Thanks @maxherbertwest 🙂
-
You're welcome, I'm just trying to make sure we all have fun.
-
do not send it -
Easiest solution is to use the DEX and buy/sell for XCP. I saw you say you paid max fee but I'm betting you just set the send to 'high' which is not max fee. -
This is NOT my dispenser!
-
LOL
-
It was created by Majoni
-
🙂
-
RUGSPENSER is the token
-
no idea lol I was complaining how dispeners can be rugged and someone turned my comment into a token
-
I think everyone needs a little in their wallet for what's coming
-
what's coming?
-
My refund... lmao
-
-
I didn't send to burn address, the user is a scammer, funds were sent back to dispenser addy, you can check all the links posted above
-
Super easy exploit, probably being taken advantage by new users from stamps and xcp20 "hype"
-
But this exploit should be solved or dispensers are basically pointless
-
Someone can also close dispenser once you've sent and you get flocked too
-
The logic is flawed and should be fixed
-
I have a a few solution ideas but no one seems to care
-
-
So there are two issues, front running and cancelling/closing dispensers:
-
The dispenser should payout to the first visible tx not the first confirmed, they can be labeled as they become visible. Then when closing a dispenser the "close" action should take 3-4 confirmations to close the dispenser to give time to any pending transactions to confrim first. These two actions would prevent front running and closing out dispensers
-
I've been victim of both
-
refunded when dispenser was closed by someone from pepechat and now twice front run on purpose by a scammer who has done this numerous times
-
you mean if the asset pumps in 30-40minutes
-
lol
-
dispensers are slow and if you set one up closing in 3-4confs is trivial to people getting scammed
-
There are high value assets being traded via dispensers... seems legit that the buyers dont get rugged
-
LOL if you return after 2 years... and now are urget to cancel in 1 conf.... cmon bro
-
bro... 3-4confs to close is a no brainer
-
Then the dispense side is more complicated but there are numerous work arounds
-
no RUGSPENSER would be better
-
If I am here complaining many people have been rugged with no recourse and of course it turns people away from the community
-
0.02btc not the end of the world but won't be using dispensers anymore
-
I've done some high value transactions before and feel nuts that this could have happened lol learned a cheap lesson
-
Yeah... but as soon as you send your TX with super high custom 5X fee I can send one with 6X fee and beat you... and you get RUGSPENSERED
-
Seems like all these problems could be solved by asking buyers to use fees high enough to ensure inclusion in next block. -
Higher fee wins even if on same block, or earliest send time?
-
The problem is that even if you pay a really high fee, if the asset is expensive, an immoral owner can see your fee rate and still beat it to close the dispenser. If the asset is 0.05 or more, the rogue seller still comes out way ahead by pocketing your payment and closing the dispenser before you get your dispense -
Ouch
-
For now niftyboss’ validated seller list is probably best solution 💪
-
Yes this. People are gonna get turned off. Best solution is dispenser closure requires X number of confirmations (maybe 5-10) and xchain pops up a message (warning - this dispenser will be closed on block XXX,XXX). This needs to be done ASAP. Confidence is a delicate thing.
-
For sure no one will bother for cheap assets 0.001 etc. but for 0.1+, some bad actors will find it worth the risk of 1 lost fee. And most dispensers are anon so there’s no rep to lose
-
No I mean a bad actor closing it as soon as he sees a pending purchase. That costs only a fee and he can take your 0.1 without dispensing
-
True. But seems like a modernization of the dispenser process is warranted until confirmations are faster, or unless a TX will fail if someone else grabbed the asset (like on ETH - if someone confirms first, your TX will fail and you only lose your gas)
-
There is no cost for an attacker to front run their own dispenser...
-
I posted a possible solution
-
That’s a good point as well. They don’t even have to close. They can make it look like a legit purchase from a random address
-
Counterparty is a legit project and should do as much as possible to prevent people getting rugged.
-
Yes this is what happened to me 2 times on FLOCK, it looks like a bot because both tx were sent within seconds of my purchase with +10sat/vB as the fee
-
Agree. Dispensers are unique. I have always liked them for Pepe’s etc. but with increased volume comes attention from attackers. Dispensers are too easy to attack. Doesn’t even require any programming skill. Just watching the address and using a higher fee. Way too easy for bad actors
-
or just automate a process... its not like the buyer can put a higher fee unless they pay with RFB and are monitoring the situation but then it becomes cat and mouse lol
-
It's like buying a pepsi in a vending machine and it dissapears as soon as you put the money in lmao
-
Definitely true. But we want 1/1s to be desirable. They are more expensive so it would be great if the dispenser mechanism could be updated to eliminate any chances of intentional front running
-
No because if you buy one, I'll send a tx to buy all 10 with a higher fee and RUG YOU
-
makes no difference actually
-
Good point. A bad actor dispenser owner can still win easily. Exchanges are coming, so this might become a moot point. I’ll never buy off a dispenser again if I can buy from an exchange that is trusted
-
Exchanges are coming for what?
-
Gotta run, but I really hope CP devs will take this to heart and program a way to eliminate any front running capabilities. Too dangerous now that there is more volume, money and opportunity in the CP system thanks to stamps blowing up
-
Stamps etc. if they can list stamps, can prob list all CP assets
-
Yeah i agree, honestly I wish I could code, I know Jdog pretty much solo and has a lot on his plate, I will do some research and see if i can help implement a solution
-
RUGSPENSERS?
-
dividends plus dispensers is something to consider. -
When coke was an ingredient? -
meaning, dispenser is only used as indication of interest.
you get back a token as a receipt and are added to allowlist.
a script will scan all transactions and use an alg to filter out frontrunner bots.
the remaining will be on allowlist and a dividends transaction is triggered to send the actual tokens you want to you. -
the point is, the solution is to have another step that inteligently weeds out bots/
-
If you don't like or understand how to use a dispenser, just make DEX trades
-
really simple solution
-
all the convo is too much, just make an <asset>/XCP trade and be done with it, no messy business
-
Reserve asset -
Dispensers were basically released because <asset>/BTC DEX trades were a pain in the ass to get through, and dispensers give people access with BTC, if you want to be extra secure, make a DEX trade for another asset, simple as
-
Very true, sadly it takes dispensers because of lack of exchange options
-
This makes the trusted dispenser list valued
-
I might be simple minded but I don't understand the statements from Mr Coins about how to fix it which are basically telling counterparty not to take tx's the way bitcoin makes them, and that sounds counterintuitive
- 28 May 2023 (219 messages)
-
You can make the dispenser pay out the first tx it sees not based on confirmations, then there can be no front running
-
Then if you add a time delay to close dispenser like 3-4 confs or more it would also prevent the dispenser being closed with pending tx
-
Xchain broke -
<asset>/<asset> or XCP, sounds great to me.
-
-
Looking into it... looks like someone fucking around with an asset description and broke counterparty2mysql parsing... will dig into it more n get a fix
-
👍
-
root@sites:/home/jdog/database# /var/www/virtual/counterparty2mysql/counterparty2mysql.php
processing block 791683...PHP Fatal error: Uncaught mysqli_sql_exception: Incorrect string value: '\xF0\x9F\x92\xB8|1...' for column 'description' at row 1 in /var/www/virtual/counterparty2mysql/includes/functions.php:239
Stack trace: -
Thank you sir
-
Will donate more to funds
-
Thanks! ❤️
-
I enjoyed the interview with Jake Jdog
-
Thanks a lot, J-DOG.
-
Yeah me too.
-
isnt that changing how bitcoin works though, the highest fee tx gets in the block, not the first, so you could bork things where a counterparty send goes through but it could take many blocks or fail on the bitcoin side
-
Sounds like someone could exploit that and get it in the 'first tx' and then RBF the send elsewhere and 'steal' the asset from the dispenser, or am I wrong?
-
root@sites:/var/www/virtual/counterparty2mysql# /var/www/virtual/counterparty2mysql/counterparty2mysql.php --block=791683
processing block 791683... Done [27.313ms]
processing block 791684... Done [50.824ms]
processing block 791685... -
parsing working again... should be caught up again in a few minutes.. forgot to strip out 4-byte UTF-8 characters from asset descriptions
-
// Replace 4-byte UTF-8 characters (fixes issue with breaking SQL queries)
$description = preg_replace('/[\x{10000}-\x{10FFFF}]/u', '', $data->description); -
-
The character that was encoded that was causing issues was a bundle of fiat cash with wings.... how fitting... Fiat/cash causing problems 😛
-
Dear user 17Xw41Zg2zxNV5DcCPQ28TdSVaAwk1SpdA: Your asset RUGSPENSERS has been added to Kaleidoscope. Many Thanks. -
lol
-
@MrCoins
-
This is not my asset!!!!
-
Can I buy your new asset ser?
-
Never forget the doll's sins -
get fucked bro
-
👏
-
What is a safe amount of recipients for a multisend? Can I do 65-70? -
-
what if i put a buy in at 1 satoshi? -
and it sits unconfirmed for weeks
-
You get the asset then the send gets dropped
-
dispensers will never be broadly useful unless some of these ideas are considered. how bitcoin works is not a reason because CP does things that bitcoin doesn’t understand anyway. dispensers thus far have been used by a small mostly trusted community. this is not scalable of you actually want a largw user base.
-
seriously laughable to hear about how to handle real problem as convoluted while everyone on CP rn is doing convoluted shit
-
I’ve never actually used Bitcoin on the DEX as it seems like a hassle but is it also susceptible to front-running? Order matches: Bitcoin is sent but before it’s confirmed the other party cancels the order. Possible?
-
BTC on the dex is safe... but complicated
-
2 parties place an order... the buying party (one paying with BTC) has to keep a wallet open listening for order matches... when an order match occurs on the DEX, the DEX reserves the items in the order_match for 20 blocks.... the BUYER has 20 blocks to notice the order match and then send a BTC payment (btcpay... special payment type, not just a normal BTC send)... and if the BTC arrives before the order match expires, then they get the tokens escrowed in the order match
-
but... 99% of the time... ppl place orders to buy n close the wallet... so order matches happen, BTC never gets sent, so the order matches expire... this is why you see so many expired orders when using BTC
-
the ONLY way to use BTC on the dex right now is via freewallet auto-BTCpay feature I wrote.... Dispensers were written by John and myself specifically to solve the "BTC is tough to use on the DEX" issue.... we wanted a way to send a single BTC payment and have it trigger a token going back in a single tx... hence dispensers were born 🙂
-
Dispensers might not be perfect, but less janky than BTC on DEX for sure 🙂
-
Well the buy needs to be for the asking price... and then if it's pending for too long the dispenser can be closed
-
so with decent fees orders are matched in two blocks?
-
Glad you have it all figured out... how about you put it in code.. Pull Requests.
-
(for the buyer)
-
in perfect scenario... 2 blocks... buyer/seller place buy/sell in same block..... orders execute and order match is created in same block... then BTC payment can be sent in next block... but usually more spread out than that... 3 blocks... seller order (block #1)... buyer order (block #2)... ordermatch... then BTC payment (block#3)
-
nice
-
should be able to do up to 1000... tho the tx fees on it go up as the size of the send goes up.... getting better fee estimation is high on the priority list
-
Probably been thought of before but why not a synthetic bitcoin xcp asset pegged to bitcoin? You’d have to trust the party behind the synthetic asset not to run off with the bitcoin but it would solve the issues with dispensers/dex.
-
Trust is the issue for that. Especially if the btc bank cannot use the btc to create a return. Even if you were to setup a dao, you need a smart contract to create or burn synBTC
-
Oh totally… but people seem to “trust” stables already… surprised no one has tried this yet
-
You only need to create an asset that is not locked. Probably a lot of work to keep the balance.
-
And how do you get compensation for the fees
-
The trusted issuer could sell in a dispenser and add on a percent or two. So you send 1 BTC and get back 0.98 sBTC
-
When you want to redeem you open a dispenser of your own. Others may buy from it, but would be up to the issuer to maintain the peg by buying from dispensers if necessary
-
Although we might be reintroducing the original problem this way lol
-
Yeah that won’t work. Redemptions would need to be OTC with the trusted party
-
Or sell via dispenser, lol
-
And who can we trust?
-
It was done before… but the company that operates it would be considered a money exchanger n must comply by U.S. laws, etc….. there was a company that did it with xbtc…. But once they learned of the legal headaches they stopped
-
-
So here is my experience using multisend with the Multisig Dust size set to: 0.00000960
Many failures. It would often do the first broadcast and then fail the second broadcast. I was trying to do about 65 addresses.
I ended up just chunking the number of addresses down to sets of 10 or so. I should have tried raising the Multisig Dust Limit but I completely forgot that I had lowered it from 7800.
Anyways, I don't know for certain that this is the culprit, but whenever I've used Multisend previously it rarely failed. -
Multisend doesn’t use multisig…. It uses p2sh So the outputs are 546 unless you change in freewallet
-
No I left that alone… the only way I was able to successfully do it was 10 addresses at a time
-
Maybe my UTXOs were too small and needed consolidation idk
-
LOL
-
divindens for holders today
-
question, once the art is uploadit to kaleidoscope. how long dos it take befor it appears on xchain?
-
24h
-
the green banner?
-
yea plus the art
-
yep
-
we uploadit the remaing art for pepeflags earlier today but i still don't see it on xchain
-
xchain.io/asset/PEPEFLAGAK
-
i think that
-
xchain.io/asset/PEPEFLAGAZ
-
xchain.io/asset/PEPEFLAGCT
-
etc
-
ok i c
-
thanx
-
i see it, love it haha
-
thank u, we made all 50 us state flags as pepes
-
-
Want to buy PEPEDDIT dm me if anyone has will pay by xcp -
Papeto 🤣(XDP/XCP) (@papeto2) on XWoohoo!! I made it😱now i have to mint my own token #Anon🤣🤣🤣 #XCP-20 Fair Launch!! https://t.co/PgsiMD6fwe 1PaPeToBurnDatShtxxxxxxxxxxtNVzkz @jdogresorg @wasthatawolf @mrarwyn @nathansonic @Carsonated @mikeinspace @jakegallen_ #XCP20 #XDP20 #BTC #BRC20 #NFTs #
-
Next week...
🐸 𝗣𝗘𝗣𝗘 & 𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘀
𝘙𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘗𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘴, 𝘍𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘙𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘴 & 𝘍𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘴
20 No Reserve Auctions
📎 https://scarce.city/collections/pepe-and-frens-17 -
-
So dex-trade support tells me deposit and withdrawls have been turned off at the request of XCP devs, is there a reason why ?
-
WTS PEPEGUN for 0.6942 BTC
I've listed at floor on Scarce.City
https://scarce.city/marketplace/digital/PEPEGUN
Serious offers will be considered, also DM me for OTC discussions.PEPEGUN | Scarce CityCheck out the PEPEGUN Bitcoin NFT at scarce.city
-
They say whatever they want… doesn’t make it true….. f you’ve been in here for any period of time, you would know this as it has been addressed many times…. Tldr anytime they have any issues, they say devs said to take down…. Reality is they don’t run a fednode like normal ppl, so every new release they struggle to update rather than running a few commands…. This time they running into issues with rust…. Gave them solution 5 days ago… still waiting on them
-
Hello :)
We have a technical issue with the counterparty containers.
Our provider, where we deployed counterparty containers, made an unexpected restart of our server and after restart in didn't run properly.
Now we have a problem with addrindexrs.
We decide to rebuild all containers, because previously counterparty container couldn't connect to addrindexrs container.
We have an error on building addindexs (on screenshot)
Federated node on last commit of master branch -
Yeah they aren't the sharpest tools over there at dextrade lol. Appreciate your quick response
-
They seemed to have added fartcoin in the meantime lmao
-
I’m an idiot, remember, so what do I know🤷🏻♂️
-
I appolazige for my frustration
-
You are far from an idiot and deserve much deserved recognition.
-
Wallet warns you not to do that
-
Because if you set up multiple dispensers on the same address, it dispenses all of the dispensers of the BTC threshold is met
-
How do you think the protocol would know what to dispense if they all have the same address
-
Yes, but over the threshold
-
Maybe read n understand stuff before just clicking ok…. Warnings are there for a reason… I do my best to warn ppl but if you don’t read them, no one to blame but yourself
-
Sorry man😢
-
I suggest making some BTNI’s, it might pay off and only costs $6 or so
-
Expensive lesson, but bet you won’t make that mistake again
-
You been RUGSPENSED
-
-
-
two more rugs
-
Looks like FLOCK buyers are getting FLOCKER
-
-
this address has not made a tx in over a week though
-
-
Can this work ?
If we put an extra text message for each dispenser
That buying from unknown dispenser can chance to lose fund buy from verify dispenser or do you know who's dispenser
each dispenser has an message? So new user don't get rip or old so .....! -
NO
-
scammers can also put extra message lol
-
here is a clue regarding Hasan's buyer
-
that address has only received 1 item in the last montg
-
Yup, only one credit in last 7 days
-
No only dev can do that
-
So its centralized... may as well have a trusted dispenser wallet at that point
-
Costly lesson, making multiple dispensers on one address is a big mistake on your part, not theirs
-
Maybe you can create some new stamps?
-
RUGSPENSERS the first token on a trusted dispenser, RUG20
-
Here is a trusted and FAIR MINT dispenser!!! https://xchain.io/tx/368fe9580cfbc3e414c2b0ab809a730b75e4dbb784ab555686de3e7357bfc0bb
-
zero hits in any group, doesn't look good for you unless they sight your requests and are happy to respond and return of their own volition
-
Just keep in mind that you did make all those dispensers in one address AFTER the wallet even told you not to
-
-
I think all of us have likely made and learned this very mistake/lesson
-
you never forget your first massive self-rug
-
RUGSPENSERS was develodep for that
-
you bet
-
It's possible the buyer thought they were getting a good deal
-
Truth^
-
yes, a few people have done this deliberately, like the Sock Master
-
I have a dispenser that is selling multiple assets for one price but I did it because of the benefit of the feature, we understand you made a mistake, but is about how you move forward after that
-
Send him a "contact me" card with your telegram handle
-
And, they might have seen the dispenser for the one asset and bought it
-
and they received a bonus gift from the creator in their viewpoint
-
make an asset
-
put contact info in description and hope they see it
-
if they look at their holdings
-
then they would see it, and may respond
-
Or they might just destroy the token, but you at least tried
-
FYI... I have decided to update BTNS-420 to recognize and respect the CP asset registration system. The BTNS is a new project to experiment with some new token functionality on Counterparty via broadcasts. I don't expect it to turn into anything... but, I DO plan to build it out and support BTNS tokens on XChain, freewallet, etc.
On the off-chance that it DOES turn into something useful, I feel it is important to respect it's roots, the community, and the asset names reserved on the Counterparty system.
What does this mean?
1. All existing Counterparty NAMED assets are automatically reserved for registration in the BTNS by the CP asset owner address
2. Users who use XCP to register a NAMED assets on CP, also automatically get the BTNS name reserved for them (if not already registered).
3. Encourages users to use Counterparty and XCP to create named assets
4. Treats BTNS as a "bolt-on" enhancement to CP (a sidechain of sorts) for playing around with CP Asset and BTNS functionality
Yesterday you owned CP BACON asset... Today you own CP BACON asset and exclusive rights to issue the BACON token on the BTNS.
I will be working on finishing off the first version of the BTNS indexer with support for ISSUE/MINT/SEND early next week. -
Also worth mentioning :
- BTNS-420 allows for 1-250 character asset names (yes, you can register 1-3 characters, and 12-250 characters...something you can't do with CP assets currently)
- BTNS-420 will support dispensers that trigger with BTC payments AND trigger with payments of other tokens (Buy one token with another token)
- BTNS-420 has some experimental and new features LIST, AIRDROP, PAUSE, RUG, CALLBACK which will allow for much more experimentation and fun 🙂 -
Once the indexer is done, i'll create a telegram channel for BTNS and break off all discussions for it there... so this place can remain CP / asset focused.... and all BTNS / token talk can go elsewhere 🙂
-
(Deleted my post, looks like something changed)
-
Putting the Lemmings to work: https://xchain.io/tx/24ae4d646eca48051ae4a1535763c275b95c361e8eca678f3908cb23892029c0 PEPELEMMINGS make for a great gift and are on SALE NOW for a once in a lifetime ultra low, extreme high quality, ultra durable and professional price!!!
-
-
lol
-
-
thank you for bringing this one up :)
the buyer doesnt appear to be in here so I will be returning thier funds to the origin address -
That was your dispenser ?
-
Doesn't even have to be a scam... it's a litteral problem
-
where are you,hahhaha ,seller almost died🙂
-
GM majoni
GIB RUGSPENSERS -
mine was a FLOCK disp no the STAMPS drama
-
oh my bad ,am sorry Vizique🙂
-
no worries :)
-
-
1M9tGyq9CtQyeJr4GyRvN13q982tuunWxk
-
I no longer control the supply, it's in the dispenser, waiting for it to empty, you'll have to get some in there, the dividends won't stop falling on it
-
RUGSPENSERS.ACOMMENT
-
RUGSPENSERS.NOTMYASSET
-
Ahahhahahahahha
-
Just read it
-
It was you @MrCoins
-
😭
-
Need a fughen calculator to digit price for 3 pieces
-
Ahhahahah
-
Ahhahahhahaha Just read the whole thing
-
There Is no dispenser for the stamp
-
-
-
Xcp20 Fair Launch : mint 10for only 10 cents
-
did i make a btni or not?😂 https://btni.org/btni/1685306484304x382832628351631360Link
BTN Image (BTNI) introduces a novel approach to image verification, leveraging the power of the Bitcoin Trust Network and Counterparty tokens to establish an immutable connection between images and tokens. The process begins by encoding the image data into a base64 or equivalent format. This encoded representation is then entered into the Bitcoin Trust Network search box, which displays a predetermined unique burn address specifically for that image. To establish a permanent link between the image and a token, the creator of the token utilizes Counterparty. The token ownership is transferred to the burn address generated for the respective image. This transfer effectively binds the image and token together, forging an unbreakable connection on the Bitcoin blockchain. By employing Counterparty tokens, which operate as assets built on top of the Bitcoin blockchain, BTN Image ensures the everlasting association between the image and the token. The immutability and decentralized nature of the Bitcoin blockchain guarantee…
-
-
I once found a vending machine that I could put my money into, and it would give me the pepsi, plus the money would fall out of the bottom of the machine... used to arrive at school with half a dozen cans
haven't found any XCP dispensers that do this though 😮💨 -
The most similar thing is an accidental multiple dispenser 😁
-
RUGSPENSED so hard his life was destroyed 😔 RIP Hasan
-
People don't read, that's part of the main issue.
-
you need be RUGSPENSADED
-
Dude tell the Kaiser to get his shillly ass in here
- 29 May 2023 (183 messages)
-
XCP dispensers favor the pepsi seller
-
indeed, haha
-
the 'xcp-20 fair mint' favors both no one and everyone 🔥
-
XCP dispenser that won't RuG you 🙂
-
-
Message me if you have any issues
-
If youre talking about Counterparty, originating 9 years ago, yes you are in the right place
-
Yes real XCP
-
I have some fakeXCP available but it's very very expensive
-
Oh shit that's nice!!!
-
XCP is used for minting tokens, and other functions on Counterparty
-
Jdog described it earlier saying " XCP is an anti-spam mechanism put on certain functions which write a bunch of data to the database... so, it serves a purpose.... I spose we could tweak CP in the future to have the anti-spam fee be calculated in BTC.... and/or have the system automatically purchase the required amount of XCP from a dispenser..... so, users would be able to issue a named asset using JUST btc... but honestly, I dont really see XCP as that much of a hurdle.. with dispensers, there is no real need to have a centralized exchange to get XCP.... and having to get some XCP from a dispenser kinda educates and familiarizes noobs with CP basics and how dispensers work, which is good, because they will most likely be setting one up relatively quickly."
-
Documentation/FAQ.md at master · CounterpartyXCP/Documentation
Official Documentation of the Counterparty Project - Documentation/FAQ.md at master · CounterpartyXCP/Documentation
-
Recently several members of our community have suffered losses with Dispensers.
Either from bad actors, or from an inadequate understanding of how dispensers operate.
The Dispensary has been set up as a community self-help group specifically around all things Dispenser related.
Historically, a lot of dispenser issues, where funds were sent by two buyers for example, have been successfully resolved through community discussion, detection and dispenser owners reimbursing people who missed out on assets, or sent wrong amounts, etc.
I'm very sympathetic to problems of funds lost from a front-run closed out dispenser.
Wherever there is a bad actor in the community, tracking down the culprit is important if it's possible to achieve it.
To date there has not been one specific forum where people can discuss Dispensers, share dispensers, discuss and confirm information about dispensers.
So I have created The Dispensary.
I will share this new group any time I see discussions of dispensers, or dispenser problems, as these threads can consume a lot of collective bandwidth for people not directly involved in problem resolution.
Everyone is welcome to join.
People will be able to post their created Dispensers in The Dispensary, that you are prepared to stand by and resolve any fulfilment problems with.
We can look at building some social identifiers against known good reused Dispenser addresses as well.
Share this link any time you see someone having problems with Dispensers
https://t.me/+mi3wuerJoXMyOGI1The DispensaryRarePepeTrader (Dank Meme Dealing since 2016) invites you to join this group on Telegram.
-
I figure let's consolidate dispenser discussions into one spot, as a lot of the time, there are simple questions that can be handled quickly, and other times a long and detailed investigation is warranted, which consumes a huge amount of people's collective bandwidth here, that's not efficient at all.
Happy to add other Admins, whoever wants to help, let me know. This is for the community, as I've seen dispenser issues discussed across so many groups, where the discussions are often off-topic to the groups and take focus off group purpose matters. -
Lotsa activity ❤️🔥
-
curently running this chat thru chatgpt:
-
to extract all questions & answers
-
-
@mrcoins gave me the idea and i'm trying to run with it instead of having to sit thru and manually do the work of building a FAQ
-
Yeah I’ve been experiencing this too
-
a lil buggy and according to chatgpt, the admins are part of the aztec network of mods
-
Yes… you should use custom fee on mpma sends and stamps…. Not the fee suggested in freewallet
Official Counterparty Chat
Public archive of Telegram messages.
- 01 May 2023 (28)
- 02 May 2023 (70)
- 03 May 2023 (23)
- 04 May 2023 (15)
- 05 May 2023 (121)
- 06 May 2023 (19)
- 07 May 2023 (25)
- 08 May 2023 (21)
- 09 May 2023 (37)
- 10 May 2023 (34)
- 11 May 2023 (90)
- 12 May 2023 (145)
- 13 May 2023 (123)
- 14 May 2023 (87)
- 15 May 2023 (141)
- 16 May 2023 (247)
- 17 May 2023 (127)
- 18 May 2023 (70)
- 19 May 2023 (64)
- 20 May 2023 (149)
- 21 May 2023 (89)
- 22 May 2023 (49)
- 23 May 2023 (203)
- 24 May 2023 (281)
- 25 May 2023 (729)
- 26 May 2023 (267)
- 27 May 2023 (494)
- 28 May 2023 (219)
- 29 May 2023 (183)
- 30 May 2023 (59)
- 31 May 2023 (114)